STAT

Opinion: Peer review could have helped short-circuit the Theranos fake news scandal

Thanks to Theranos, startups might now face a greater burden of proof to demonstrate their technology is effective.
Source: Kristoffer Tripplaar/AP

Theranos had a product almost everyone could get behind: a revolutionary blood test that would allow individuals to quickly and easily access information about their health. Startups like Theranos rely on cutting-edge innovation, then leverage that innovation to attract investors. Now the company’s downfall is a signal to innovators, the public, and the media that we need more transparency and credibility built on peer-reviewed publications.

Holmes, who was accused of falsely claiming that Theranos had developed a portable analyzer that could perform virtually any medical test using with the Security and Exchange Commission for a penalty of $500,000, among other things.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from STAT

STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About A J&J Cough Syrup, A Pfizer And Moderna Patent Suit, And More
A Johnson & Johnson children’s cough syrup found to contain unsafe levels of a toxic industrial solvent was sold in six African countries.
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About BIO’s China Challenge, Zepbound Shortages, And More
BIO's about-face in its relationship with WuXi AppTec illustrates the difficulty the biotech industry faces in dealing with an issue that is moving fast and forcefully.
STAT1 min read
Opinion: STAT+: How AI Can Help Satisfy FDA’s Drug, Device Diversity Requirements
To meet the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act, companies must rethink their current clinical trial strategies. Including AI and machine learning approaches can help.

Related Books & Audiobooks