Los Angeles Times

Editorial: The Supreme Court wrongly blesses a religious symbol on public property

If the United States aims to be a tolerant, pluralistic country that treats all its citizens with respect, the Supreme Court shouldn't be giving its blessing to the display of one faith's sacred symbols on property that belongs to the public. But that's what seven justices did Thursday when they ruled that a giant memorial cross at a highway intersection near Washington, D.C., doesn't violate the 1st Amendment.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times5 min read
California's Proposed Budget Cuts Would Leave Many Autistic Young Adults Without A Safety Net
Kate Movius knew it would be challenging when her son Aidan, who experiences profound autism, turned 22 and aged out of the programs and services provided through his school. What she didn't anticipate was the two years she would spend in a fruitless
Los Angeles Times2 min readCrime & Violence
Megan Thee Stallion, Roc Nation Sued By Personal Cameraman, Who Makes A Provocative Allegation
Megan Thee Stallion is being sued by a personal cameraman who alleges the “Hot Girl Summer” singer, her management company and several other related entities engaged in hostile work environment harassment and various labor-law violations. The lawsuit
Los Angeles Times9 min read
Q&A: David Fincher Talks Us Through The Off-screen Torture Of Making 'Seven'
By any reasonable measure, David Fincher had made it by 1990. He was directing rapturous music videos for Madonna ("Express Yourself," "Vogue") and doing lucrative ads for top brands worldwide. The production company he co-founded, Propaganda Films,

Related Books & Audiobooks