Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Tales from Shakespeare: Twelfth Night
Tales from Shakespeare: Twelfth Night
Tales from Shakespeare: Twelfth Night
Audiobook27 minutes

Tales from Shakespeare: Twelfth Night

Written by Mary Lamb and Charles Lamb

Narrated by Emma Topping

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

About this audiobook

The re-written Shakespeare tale of Twelfth Night by Charles and Mary Lamb.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJan 3, 2001
ISBN9781907818899
Tales from Shakespeare: Twelfth Night

More audiobooks from Mary Lamb

Related to Tales from Shakespeare

Related audiobooks

Performing Arts For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Tales from Shakespeare

Rating: 3.873134257462686 out of 5 stars
4/5

268 ratings17 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Mijn eerste kennismaking met Shakespeare, toen ik 16 was. Ik was er toen niet zo weg van, maar latere lectuur deden me deze heel mooie proza-vertellingen veel beter smaken!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    These are always good and many editions have passed through,
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Outstanding illustrations.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Lamb's TALES offers brief renderings of Shakespeare plays, with a few tantalizing quotes.I was looking forward to being inspired beyond my three favorites: A Midsummer Night's Dream, Hamlet,and Macbeth. The only other play I'd read was Othello, which is just too depressing, however well executed.Unfortunately, none of the others, from the anti-Semitic Shylock and witch's brew to the proposed beheading, hanging, and plotted murders,delivered an joy or intrigue.From the author - "For all our sympathy with Lear, we listen to his curse with complex emotions: it is majestic and it is terrible to hear."
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    (Original Review, 1981-01-18)The book industry is becoming like the film industry; no new ideas so just reboot or copy a previous story...Star Trek Into Darkness being the most cynical by simply reorganizing original a Trek film script and a couple of cases word for word."Rosencrantz and Guildernstern are Dead" (an) "interesting, imaginative reworkings of Shakespeare". Up to a point, Lord Copper. R&G riffs marvellously on Hamlet. But it relies on the audience having a pretty solid knowledge of the play, even down to some of the more minor characters in it, and being able to fit them into the large context. The basic pitch --- that the smaller characters have lives of their own --- plays out in front of the (almost completely unseen) "other play". I wonder how many people enjoy R&G without having Hamlet pretty well to hand: not many, to judge from the dire film of it a few years ago.It's one thing to write a text that stands on its own but uses some elements of Shakespeare for those that want to spot it (10 Things I Hate About You) and another to write a text that is intimately bound up with a text you're assumed to know (R&G). But what's being proposed here is a standalone text which doesn't assume you know the play already, but which also provides a gloss on (presumably) most of the play. Whole other situation.(Amusingly, an extract from R&G was one of the unseen texts in the SAT "English Literature" subject test this month. That must have been fun for some of the people taking it). I'm not 'against' it like some of the commenters seem to be but this is about the 100th time I can remember in the last 20 years or so that there has been some scheme to 'bring Shakespeare back to life' and it is pretty daft.Shakespeare is still important to the 'template' for drama, scholars will point out that he (or they...) didn't invent anything but wherever it comes from people are still using Shakespeare all the time.One would think writers, if they have any professional integrity at all, would have sufficient respect for another writer to leave his work alone. But then, of course, there's that money-thing that tempers respect for others.Let's see: Shakespeare died, and five centuries later rewriting his works (which is not at all the same as creating original adaptations, whether it is “Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern are Dead” or “West Side Story”), but rewriting his works. What a way to note his death: arrogantly believing his works need resurrecting and thinking you can manage it. Oh, my.I can't help feeling as though this is like 'pyramid selling' as the whole exercise stinks of little to do with literature. "IT", I believe is another prime example of the risk averse publishers exploitation. Exploiting Shakespeare - again, exploiting the talent of authors by coercing them to void originality and re-hash, and exploiting consumers with such a blatant marketing spin. Random House should know better, this, even if good will be the literary equivalent of big brother. The literati academics are quick to knock Jourdan and her 50th book out (she must be the only author to have written more books than she has read) - but this is just a highbrow version of the same thing!This has nothing to do with writing, or literature, just sales. I know I got some shit because of the style and content of my book, but at least I can stand up and say it had integrity. Sadly, I remember the National Gallery pulling a similar carry-on with famous paintings.The idea that contemporary authors cannot create genuinely new work inspired by the canon is very narrow, and if you'll forgive me, probably held by people who are not themselves writers. Winterson has frequently proposed in her own novels that stories are not linear, static objects. She has an extraordinary gift of invention and I am sure is quite capable of adding to the joy of The Winter's Tale by working through in her own mind what the play might mean to her, and to us. Even school-level reading of Shakespeare is an act of reinvention and interpretation. I think we should look forward to that act being performed by a writer of her distinction. But will their poetic and dramatic skills be up to it ? If genuine, why not bring to the masses more overlooked greats like Chaucer, Blake, Homer? We all know Shakespeare is a household name, throw in a known writer and BOOM - literary recycling.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    These stories are a perfect way to introduce children to Shakespeare’s plays. I loved this book when I was 10, and I’m convinced it’s one of the main reasons I was a Shakespeare fanatic well before I entered high school.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    From the foreword: ”In the twenty tales told in this book, the Lambs succeeded in paraphrasing the language of truly adult literature in children’s terms.”And they succeeded beautifully. Each tale is about twenty pages long. I confess that I’ve never actually read Shakespeare, and frankly found myself somewhat daunted by the thought. This was a lovely way to taste the stories, in a thoughtful retelling for children.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The kids begged for more Shakespeare. No, really, they did. Although it was a difficult read aloud with all of it's run on sentences, this was a wonderful version of Shakespeare. Not overly simplified but easier than reading the plays. I had intended to read one story a month to them but ended up doing one or more a week!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I think this book is great to approach before reading the original. I had read Romeo and Juliet before I read this book and had some confusion in some parts. However, if I had read this book before reading the original, I would have had less trouble at reading Romeo and Julliet. Also, all the stories are quite short and fast-paced. I was able to finish one story before I got bored.I really enjoyed reading this - more than I thought I would.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Mijn eerste kennismaking met Shakespeare, toen ik 16 was. Ik was er toen niet zo weg van, maar latere lectuur deden me deze heel mooie proza-vertellingen veel beter smaken!
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Children are not inherently stupid; nor are they incapable of processing complex emotional situations. However, the Lambs' Tales from Shakespeare is just one of the publications that has convinced adults everywhere that their poor little darling really aren't very bright, and they must be sheltered from dangerous ideas at all cost! The cost, in this case, is a Canon King, and confidence in children's intellectual capabilities. I said this before, but I'll say it again: the Lambs present the shell of the plots, but the characters and details are horribly mangled. The language and story construction are clumsy, and I'm amazed I ever made it through the book as a young reader. I have very strong ideas about children and reading material, so I realize I will be in the minority in my opinions. But so they stand. Neither of us enjoyed the latest bedtime story.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I originally read this in my grandmother's edition (hence the 1915 date), and reviewed again about five years ago. The second reading was a little disappointing, but tempered by the fact that I had to account for the period in which the book was published.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    These are twenty stories from Shakespeare's works, retold for children. The old language and play format have been removed. Frankly, they don't appeal to me much, though for smaller children who are not ready to read Shakespeare, I suppose they could be a good thing.The reason I love this book is the illustrator. I will buy anything which Arthur Rackham has illustrated, and the pictures in this volume are fine, though I wish there were more.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This is an audio version of Tales From Shakespeare, the IDEAL primer for anyone interested in becoming familiar with the works of the great bard. The stories’ warmth and clarity make them pleasurable reading even to confirmed Shakespeareans. The brother/sister team of Charles and Mary Lamb retold Shakespeare’s fourteen comedies and six tragedies in prose form in 1807, they wanted to make the stories accessible to children and to offer moral education to the young – something for which Shakespeare had a natural talent. Let us not underestimate young readers: they love a complex story with many and varied characters, twists of plot, and turns of fate as much as anyone — but they draw the line at reading in unfamiliar language. The Lambs provide a real feast of plain fare, and flavor it with as many tasty tidbits of Shakespearean language as they felt the young reader could easily digest. This is a FOUNDATIONAL book to one’s education. It WILL add to one’s cultural literacy.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    These are the Comedies told in "story" form suitable for boys and girls. The Notes by the Editor, William Rolfe reveal him to be an idiot (clueless about children), so I worry about his "editing", and wonder what Charles and Mary Lamb did originally.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Date unknown, but must be prior to 1970 because the marked price is five shillings. Contains Charles and Mary Lamb's retellings of "A Midsummer Night's Dream", "As You Like It", "The Merchant of Venice", "Romeo and Juliet", "King Lear", and "Othello." These sweet and unpretentious re-tellings of stories from some of Shakepeare's most important plays prepare a child for the real thing, and the woodcut illustrations add life to the tales.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Best introduction to most of Shakespeare's plays. A nice short story for each work.