Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life: A Psychologist Investigates How Evolution, Cognition, and Complexity Are Revolutionizing Our View of Human Nature
    Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life: A Psychologist Investigates How Evolution, Cognition, and Complexity Are Revolutionizing Our View of Human Nature
    Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life: A Psychologist Investigates How Evolution, Cognition, and Complexity Are Revolutionizing Our View of Human Nature
    Audiobook7 hours

    Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life: A Psychologist Investigates How Evolution, Cognition, and Complexity Are Revolutionizing Our View of Human Nature

    Written by Douglas T. Kenrick, PhD

    Narrated by Fred Stella

    4/5

    ()

    About this audiobook

    Why do we do what we do? Especially those seemingly inexplicable behaviors-from the disreputable to the downright despicable?Between what can be learned from evolutionary psychology (thinking that has developed in our species over the millenniums to ensure its propagation) and cognitive science (how our minds literally think) a picture emerges. In Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life, social psychologist Douglas Kenrick fuses these two fields to create a coherent story of human nature. In his analysis, many ingrained, apparently irrational behaviors-one-night stands, prejudice, conspicuous consumption, even art and religious devotion-are quite explicable and (when desired) avoidable. When combined with insights from complexity theory, Kenrick#8217;s argument reveals how simple mechanisms give rise to complex life.Through an engaging blend of anecdote, analogy and research findings, Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life takes listeners on a singular tour of the human mind, exploring the pitfalls and promises of our biological inheritance.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherHighbridge Company
    Release dateApr 26, 2011
    ISBN9781611744446
    Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life: A Psychologist Investigates How Evolution, Cognition, and Complexity Are Revolutionizing Our View of Human Nature

    Related to Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life

    Related audiobooks

    Psychology For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      No, You Can’t Feel Sorry for Everyone: The idea of empathy for all ignores the limits of human psychology.

      Apr 14, 2016

      The world seems to be getting more empathetic. Americans donate to charity at record rates. People feel the pain of suffering in geographically distant countries brought to our attention by advances in communications and transportation. Violence, see

      5 min read

    • Article

      Why Are Humans So Kind, Yet So Cruel?

      Mar 6, 2019

      Under different circumstances, humans can be the kindest, gentlest species or the most murderous. Evolution may hold clues to that Jekyll and Hyde nature.

      5 min read

    • Article

      Yes, You’re Irrational, and Yes, That’s OK: The insight that will save you from being manipulated.

      Feb 26, 2015

      Imagine that (for some reason involving cultural tradition, family pressure, or a shotgun) you suddenly have to get married. Fortunately, there are two candidates. One is charming and a lion in bed but an idiot about money. The other has a reliable i

      10 min read

    • Article

      3 Ways To... Be Less Anxious

      Dec 15, 2020

      1 LIMIT THE NEGATIVES IN YOUR LIFE. From the doom and gloom of the news to social media posts that annoy you, be more selective with what you engage with. 2 BE HONEST ABOUT HOW MUCH IT’S AFFECTING YOU. When you are in a constant state of worry and f

      1 min read

    • Article

      The Self Is Other People

      Apr 3, 2018

      The Self Is Other People
      3 min read

    • Article

      Stanford Scientist, After Decades Of Study, Concludes: We Don't Have Free Will

      Oct 19, 2023

      Before epilepsy was understood to be a neurological condition, people believed it was caused by the moon, or by phlegm in the brain. They condemned seizures as evidence of witchcraft or demonic possession, and killed or castrated sufferers to prevent

      8 min read

    • Article

      Nowhere Man

      Jun 5, 2022

      Nowhere Man
      4 min read

    • Article

      The Bugs in Our Mindware: Many obstacles lie on the path to rational thought.

      May 7, 2015

      Three baseball umpires are talking about how they play the game. The first says, “I call ’em as they are.” The second, “I call ’em as I see ’em.” And the third says, “They ain’t nothin’ till I call ’em.” Most of the time all of us are like the first

      17 min read

    • Article

      “Angry, Selfish, Gifted, Weird!”

      Jun 16, 2021

      To this day, I don’t know why I decided to sneak a glimpse at the phys-ed teacher’s notes in Grade 4. The very notion of a clandestine peek at the teacher’s clipboard was, for a rule-obsessed kid like me, tantamount to breaking into the principal’s o

      5 min read

    • Article

      The Voice Of Reason

      Apr 14, 2023

      The Voice Of Reason
      2 min read

    • Article

      Jamie Wheal Meaning 3.0

      Jul 17, 2022

      Jamie Wheal Meaning 3.0
      18 min read

    • Article

      Can You Change Who You Are?

      Oct 28, 2019

      In the last decade of his life my Canadian father-in-law became so averse to change that he would not contemplate moving a piece of furniture from one side of the room to the other. I know that elderly people can get this way – stubborn, fixed – but

      4 min read

    • Article

      Proud To Be Different

      Sep 8, 2019

      Proud To Be Different
      4 min read

    • Article

      The Dark Side of Awe

      Jan 29, 2024

      The Dark Side of Awe
      10 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life

    4/5

    56 ratings8 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 5/5
      absolutely enjoyed every minute of this book. very scientific yet it feels like your listening to a buddy of yours. Every bit makes complete sense and very easy to understand. Really gives a warning about some of our false ideas on human behavior. The book is written by a liberal, the academic tends to be a liberal one, but it shows how some of the things we blame on our culture are false. If you're interested in psychology, evolution, politics, feminism, and a bunch more this book will peak your interests.
    • 4/5
      An entertaining overview of evolutionary psychology. Kenrick takes examples from the real world (mainly his own life) and explains our irrational behaviors from the perspective of evolutionary psychology. He explains the development of theories and the supporting evidence so clearly and engagingly, it is possible to forget you're reading about such an in-depth topic.Recommended for those who are interested in psychology or biology but don't have degrees in either.
    • 5/5
      I should, before reviewing, disclaim that this was a free book from Librarything, which I got on the condition that I review it. Douglas Kenrick's Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life: A Psychologist Investigates How Evolution, Cognition, and Complexity Are Revolutionizing Our View of Human Nature was, on the whole, a very enjoyable audiobook.Generally, Kenrick does a good job of bringing together his personal experiences and the research he and others have done -- both pointing towards very interesting insights into human nature. This is especially interesting given Kenrick's unusual background (at least, unusual for an academic): his experience having a father who landed in prison, his youthful days as a street hoodlum, and his frank discussion of his past divorces all lend interesting notes to the discussion of evolutionary psychology he presents. I realized, only late into reading the book, that I'd heard of Kenrick before: he was in the news -- a certain kind of rarefied academic news, that is -- as one of the researchers who had proposed a revised form of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. (I'd been researching the Maslovian concept of a hirarhcy of needs for a paper a couple of summers ago and come across Kenrick and company's proposed rearrangement.) I'm not sure what I think of Kenrick's reconstruction -- on the one hand, I'm not wholly sure that self-actualization need be discarded, or separated from child-rearing, and on the other, I rather think that the "self-actualization" that Kenrick folds down into Esteem and other social-capital related values is a bit problematic. Some people, for example, compose music for respect: others do it to get the music in their heads out into the world, to give it life. (Most writers I know write for the same reason.) I think, rather, there may be a sort of fluidity in our brains about different kinds of offspring, whether biological, mechanical (in the case of an inventor or repairman), memetic (the musician or writer), or whatever. The book does raise interesting questions, while explaining things clearly and understandably. I especially appreciated the section where he and other researchers find evidence supporting a proposition that they'd originally doubted: that the difference between the Religious Right and the Left in America is fruitfully seen as a playing-out of different mating strategies... though it presents us with the dilemma (which Kenrick doesn't address, beyond saying he takes the issue less personally now) of what we are to do with this reality, given how things far removed from child-rearing (such as foreign policy, the state of public education, and more) hinge on something as basic as the conflict between different mating strategies? In any case, I liked the book for rounding out my knowledge of some studies, for raising anew certain questions that vex me, and for lending a new perspective on a few interesting questions. Kenrick's book may not be a groundshaking new contribution to the popularization of evolutionary psychology, but he is interesting and funny... and I think you can safely ignore reviewers who imply he's sexist, or doesn't know what he's talking about. From what I can tell, they weren't "reading" (or listening) all that carefully, or are hellbent on being offended by scientific inquiry into human sex differentiation... or, they simply don't understand what's being argued. I am pretty sensitive to people justifying sexism on the basis of theory, whether scientific, cultural, or otherwise, and I saw none of that. And Kenrick doesn't gloss over racism: indeed, his discussion offers a partial explanation for it. (Incomplete, yes, but what are we expecting him to do, explain it all the way through?) As for the audio, Fred Stella is a good narrator in general, with a friendly and engaging narrative voice. The only thing that drove me crazy was the amount of punched-in dubbing in the text, especially -- and somewhat embarrassingly -- in the names of researchers who had worked with Kenrick. One wishes that whoever was producing the audiobook had gone ahead and either gotten the pronunciations checked beforehand, or at least allowed Stella to punch in and out with longer clips. Or, hell, a little more professional handling of the audio setup could have made the edits done later a little bit less apparent. But all in all, it was very well narrated.
    • 3/5
      I suspect most people’s objections to psychological research that demonstrates a trend toward our more base instincts (e.g., it’s all about mating!) is rooted in a basic misunderstanding of how said research is conducted. It’s a series of surveys and other tests administered to a semi-random group of volunteers. The findings imply general tendencies - none of which are all that surprising, by the way - but that does not mean we are mindless automatons at the mercies of our impulses. Obviously. For example, women tend to notice and remember powerful men regardless of looks while men are more drawn toward beautiful women regardless of status. Does this mean I judge every male I come across by his earning potential? Of course not. But it’s not a shocking notion that we may subconsciously be more aware of those more ideally suited to pass along our genes. And that’s most of what this book is about: our view of the world through the eyes of our evolutionary makeup, most of which has to do with creating viable offspring. I do wish homosexuality had been mentioned earlier and delved into more deeply, but if you’re only curious in heterosexual reactions, this could be quite interesting. Alas, there was very little I hadn’t heard before, and nothing I could not have suspected on my own, but this might serve as an interesting book to one new to the field of evolutionary psychology.A note on the audio: Kenrick mentions early on that he has a New York accent, so Stella is a good choice. As an added bonus, his friendly, conversational tone makes what could in less competent hands (throats?) be somewhat dry material fun, quirky, and personal.
    • 4/5
      Review based on ARCThis was, for me, someone without much of a background in "evolutionary psychology," interesting and thought provoking. I appreciated that the author presented the theory without dumbing it down too much, while still making it accessible to someone who is interested in psychology but doesn't quite have the time to really focus on it.The author expresses his theories on how our natural inclinations toward selfishness and pleasure have often given way to the some of society's greatest achievements. He uses anecdotes, including personal ones, to offer examples of his theories and, ultimately, makes the book intriguing and entertaining, without really losing sight of his "sciency" theories.Whether, in the end, you agree with Mr. Kenrick and the other evolutionary psychologists or not, it is worth reading this fascinating exploration of our motivations and how they move society and individuals forward in a productive way (or, at least someone's theory of that ;)).Definitely recommend for the curious reader.
    • 3/5
      This book had some interesting information, but I felt it lacking in actual substance. The passages seemed highly anecdotal without real statistics to back things up. In a research type book, I think those "hard numbers" are very important. Without that, I felt much of the time I was getting the author's opinion, but questioned exactly how he arrived at that opinion.
    • 5/5
      Sex, Murder, and the Meaning of Life by Douglas Kenrick is a very engaging review of the latest research in the field of evolutionary psychology (that is, explaining our actions from an evolutionary perspective). What could be a dry non-fiction book is light, humorous, and interesting, primarily because of the author's breezy writing style, and his willingness to include personal observations and life lessons in the material. A very thought-provoking and interesting introduction to a field of research that can be dry and confusing. Recommended.
    • 3/5
      Free LibraryThing Early Reviewer book. If you want to know what evolutionary psychology is up to these days, at least in its popular face, this wouldn’t be a bad start. He’s very impressed with his rebelliousness against political correctness. He says of one experiment that his results show that “people” differ depending on the characteristics of the people they’re seeing; oh wait, it’s just “men” who differ in their reactions. This implicit definition is not conducive to trust on my part. The major flaw of his discussion of gender differences related to mating strategies is the repeated statements (the number must be in the hundreds) that men and women differ in various reactions. What he never clarifies: By how much? With what overlap? (The excellent Delusions of Gender is a good place to look for asking how to read studies "proving" gender differences.) The book is silent on race except for how we can manipulate emotions to increase or decrease implicit bias. So, he defends the gender history of the field but not its racial follies.There’s also an unfortunate caricature of behavioral economists as thinking that people are idiots (he uses this term and others), as if predictable mistakes given certain conditions were some sort of moral flaw that he’s saving us from accepting as our lot. Instead, he argues, such heuristics are the evolutionary equivalent of the invisible hand: our stupid decisions promote genetic survival. This might be true sometimes, but it doesn’t make too much sense as a general rule. On his own terms, numerous conditions—such as the ability to compare ourselves with the richest, most attractive people in the world rather than the local highs—weren’t present in the environment of evolutionary adaptation, and thus responses adaptive in that environment might destroy our reproductive success in this one. Or, if we’re so smart, why do some of us become heroin addicts? By shortchanging behavioral economics because he’s so insistent on evolutionary explanations (for reasons that read kind of like projection based on standard criticisms of evo psych), he ends up both Candide-like and suggesting a kind of fixity I don’t even think he really believes in. Near the end, he acknowledges that the field has spent too much time on sex differences, even though he’s written a book mostly about them, and there’s plenty in the book about the flexibility of human responses given different circumstances.