Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Those Angry Days: Roosevelt, Lindbergh, and America's Fight over World War II, 1939-1941
    Those Angry Days: Roosevelt, Lindbergh, and America's Fight over World War II, 1939-1941
    Those Angry Days: Roosevelt, Lindbergh, and America's Fight over World War II, 1939-1941
    Audiobook18 hours

    Those Angry Days: Roosevelt, Lindbergh, and America's Fight over World War II, 1939-1941

    Written by Lynne Olson

    Narrated by Robert Fass

    4/5

    ()

    About this audiobook

    At the center of the debate over American intervention in World War II stood the two most famous men in America: President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who championed the interventionist cause, and aviator Charles Lindbergh, who as unofficial leader and spokesman for America's isolationists emerged as the president's most formidable adversary. Their contest of wills personified the divisions within the country at large, and Lynne Olson makes masterly use of their dramatic personal stories to create a poignant and riveting narrative. While FDR, buffeted by political pressures on all sides, struggled to marshal public support for aid to Winston Churchill's Britain, Lindbergh saw his heroic reputation besmirched-and his marriage thrown into turmoil-by allegations that he was a Nazi sympathizer.

    Spanning the years 1939 to 1941, Those Angry Days vividly re-creates the rancorous internal squabbles that gripped the United States in the period leading up to Pearl Harbor. After Germany vanquished most of Europe, America found itself torn between its traditional isolationism and the urgent need to come to the aid of Britain, the only country still battling Hitler. The conflict over intervention was, as FDR noted, "a dirty fight," rife with chicanery and intrigue, and Those Angry Days recounts every bruising detail. In Washington, a group of high-ranking military officers, including the Air Force chief of staff, worked to sabotage FDR's pro-British policies. Roosevelt, meanwhile, authorized FBI wiretaps of Lindbergh and other opponents of intervention. At the same time, a covert British operation, approved by the president, spied on antiwar groups, dug up dirt on congressional isolationists, and planted propaganda in U.S. newspapers.

    The stakes could not have been higher. The combatants were larger than life. With the immediacy of a great novel, Those Angry Days brilliantly recalls a time fraught with danger when the future of democracy and America's role in the world hung in the balance.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherTantor Media, Inc
    Release dateMar 26, 2013
    ISBN9781452682006
    Those Angry Days: Roosevelt, Lindbergh, and America's Fight over World War II, 1939-1941
    Author

    Lynne Olson

    Lynne Olson, former White House correspondent for The Sun (Baltimore), is the author of Freedom’s Daughters, and co-author, with her husband, Stanley Cloud, of A Question of Honor and The Murrow Boys. She lives in Washington, D.C.

    More audiobooks from Lynne Olson

    Related to Those Angry Days

    Related audiobooks

    United States History For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      'Heirs Of The Founders' Profiles The 'Second Generation' Of Great American Leaders

      Nov 13, 2018

      In his latest historical spellbinder, bestselling author and scholar H.W. Brands profiles Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and John Calhoun, as well as the decades leading up to the Civil War.

      3 min read

    • Article

      The General In Defeat

      Sep 21, 2021

      On April 29, 1865, readers of The New York Herald opened their newspapers to find a captivating scoop—an in-depth interview with Confederate commander Robert E. Lee. Speaking in Richmond two weeks to the day after his surrender to Ulysses S. Grant at

      11 min read

    • Article

      John Kelly -- and a Whole Lot of Other Americans -- Can't Handle the Truth About Slavery

      Nov 5, 2017

      Slavery caused the Civil War. A failure to compromise had nothing to do with it. Yes, I know a thousand people have made that point in the days since White House Chief of Staff John Kelly's nonsensical assertion on Fox "News" that "the lack of an abi

      2 min read

    • Article

      Marketing Lincoln

      Apr 6, 2021

      Marketing Lincoln
      5 min read

    • Article

      Divided We Stand

      Dec 4, 2018

      Divided We Stand
      13 min read

    • Article

      Hitler’s Greatest Mistake?

      Nov 25, 2021

      Hitler’s Greatest Mistake?
      8 min read

    • Article

      Fight To The Finish

      Aug 2, 2019

      Fight To The Finish
      3 min read

    • Article

      A Bet On The British

      Jun 4, 2019

      A Bet On The British
      12 min read

    • Article

      In Praise of …

      Jan 26, 2023

      In Praise of …
      4 min read

    • Article

      The War Goes On

      Apr 17, 2020

      The War Goes On
      3 min read

    • Article

      Agent A12

      Oct 26, 2023

      Agent A12
      9 min read

    • Article

      Ivo Dawnay

      Sep 21, 2022

      Oneworld £20 Hindsight is not always a fine thing – especially when it comes to wars. Widely-held opinion, aided and abetted by fictions like Julian Fellowes’s Gosford Park and Kasuo Ishiguro’s The Remains of the Day, still caricatures the coalition

      3 min read

    • Article

      The Possibility

      Sep 10, 2020

      As well as not joining the war, it’s highly unlikely that had Lindbergh run for and won the presidency in 1940 that the Lend-Lease programme or something similar would have been instigated. Following Roosevelt’s victory, in 1941 Winston Churchill app

      1 min read

    • Article

      The Possibility

      Jan 18, 2024

      As well as not joining the war, it’s highly unlikely that had Lindbergh run for and won the presidency in 1940 that the Lend-Lease programme or something similar would have been instigated. Following Roosevelt’s victory, in 1941 Winston Churchill app

      1 min read

    • Article

      War List ‘I See…’

      May 7, 2019

      War List ‘I See…’
      6 min read

    • Article

      The Other Hitler

      Feb 23, 2018

      Is it true that Adolf Hitler’s nephew served in the U.S. Navy during World War II? Esther Wloch Plymouth, Michigan Yes. William Patrick Hitler was born on March 12, 1911, in Liverpool, England, to Adolf Hitler’s halfbrother, Alois Hitler Jr., and Iri

      1 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Those Angry Days

    4/5

    69 ratings9 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 3/5
      The difficult path FDR had to take in adopting pro England policies is well developed here. His foes were Lindbergh, the America First Party, and isolationists were his allies. His allies were the Century Club and other groups.
    • 4/5
      In all the rancor of the pre-war politics, I felt like Olson was trying to give the reader a fair telling of the positives and negatives of the pro-war and anti-war factions. Roosevelt was shown as a flawed human, preoccupied with not getting ahead of popular opinion, at times suspicious or vindictive. But a charismatic leader who idealized national unity. Lindbergh was shown as driven toward his own ideals, against the national mood and tempering advice. He could not take seriously other opinions divergent from his own, from the nation or from his family. At the end his daughter recognized that he lacked that ability to really listen.Some things I learned: * After the court-packing fiasco, Roosevelt was not confident he could lead popular opinion anymore, and he hesitated to push for war, even though he believed in saving Britain. The US could have entered the war far earlier if he had taken the risk and publicly pushed for it.* Hitler did not want the US in the war until he had a chance to finish off Europe. He had to balance how to advance militarily without alarming America so much that they would engage.* Many Americans did not like Britain at all, seeing it as an imperialistic belligerent. They equivocated between siding with Britain or Nazi Germany. * Nazi state persecution against Jews was very well known and not seriously concerning throughout America.* Republicans were generally anti-war isolationists, but when America finally entered the war they ironically gained congressional seats from the pro-war enthusiasm, because they were seen as the nationalistic party. * Even after Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt still did not want to engage Germany and only declared war on Japan, to the dismay of Britain. Germany hastily declared war on America, giving Roosevelt the justification to finally jump into Europe directly.* America's support of Britain led to a number of American casualties and damages inflicted by German forces, the first deaths of the war before we had even officially begun. Even still, Roosevelt avoided using this as a pretense to declare war.* Politics is always politics. Both sides make a public case while concealing their true intentions. Pro-war incremental actions were presented as regrettably necessary for American self protection, and swearing to never actually engage in the war. Of course they wanted to ease into the war. Anti-war actions were presented as saving American blood and treasure from a distant foreign concern. But they played it up to exaggerated levels (wailing mothers, predictions of financial ruin), and occasionally let pro-German and antisemitic sentiments slip. * It was learning about the holocaust that made antisemitism unacceptable in America.
    • 4/5
      I have only begun reading this, but I find it is a well-researched and rather coolly objective account of the struggle between isolationists and internationalists in the last years before the US entered World War II, focusing on the ;personal duel between Charles Lindbergh and Franklin Roosevelt., with considerable discussion of British and American propagandists for intervention and their isolationist opponents. It tends to be very sympathetic to Lindbergh's wife Anne, though not so much to Lindbergh himself; It also follows Anne's brother-in-law Aubrey Morgan, one of the leading British propagandists in America. Although it accept that FDR's side was basically "right" it is very aware of his nature as a calculating politician and does not present him along the heroic lines of some of his admirers.
    • 4/5
      This covers from 39-41, and the contentious issue of whether and how much the US should support Britain against Germany. FDR and interventionist groups are on one side, while Charles Lindbergh and isolationists are on the other. A sad picture of Lindbergh emerges, as he had been pursued by reporters for years, and proves to make many unwise decisions. Also, the aftermath of his life is quite surprising, as he fathers many children in Europe.Also, Anne's life is comparably sad, as she lives in his shadow. The book fills an interesting gap in America's wrestling with its unpreparedness for war, and its desire to avoid it entirely. The book is a good read, but not compelling for me.
    • 4/5
      Excellent study of the two-year period leading up to Pearl Harbor on Dec 7, 1941. The author follows the progress of American public opinion about the growing conflicts in Europe due to the Nazi expansion and conquest of nations. The main antagonists are FDR and Charles Lindbergh, but the story is much wider than those two men. The author excellently details how American isolationist beliefs were an important part of our history as a nation, and how difficult it was to bring out a clear picture of the full threat of Naziism to the world and to America. I really enjoyed reading this book. Olson has also written other histories of the period which I am going to read as well.
    • 5/5
      Outstanding. Regardless of what you may know or think you know about the topic this will add to your base of knowledge. Balanced analysis of the characters and issues. No one, Lindbergh, FDR is exempt from criticism or duplicity. Good use of anecdotes. First rate scholarship in handling of sources.
    • 4/5
      I found this to be a good narrative history of how the general populace of the United States tried to decide what it thought about intervening in World War II, until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor upset all preconceptions held by Interventionists and Isolationists alike. The greatest strength in the book might be how Olson captures the cut and thrust of the pressure group politics in the wake of the Fall of France. Olson is also fortunate enough to have the thoughts and writings of Anne Morrow Lindbergh to fall back upon; as much as anyone can enlighten one to the motivations of the great sphinx that was her husband.The greatest weakness might be that I'm not sure that the period depth of dislike of the British Empire is quite done justice. Talking about this book with my mother, who is old enough and vital enough to have vivid memories of that time, she noted that people used to use the term "Johnny Bulls" as a term of real invective.
    • 4/5
      This history of America in the years 1939-1941 uses the two outsized personalities of Roosevelt and Lindbergh as exemplars of the isolationism and internationalism in those years. While the story ranged far afield of just those two individuals, it returned to them often to personalize and focus the controversy. I felt it was both entertaining and informative.
    • 5/5
      This is an in depth look at the two sides of the issue over whether or not the United States should enter the conflict that would become World War II. Franklin D. Roosevelt and his supporters representing the interventionists and Charles Lindbergh, arguably the second most influential man at this time in the U. S., representing the isolationists. Lindbergh wanted nothing to do with the war. He proposed the U. S. should stay out of the war even if it meant all of Europe, including England, were to be taken over by Nazi Germany. His radical views and outspokenness would result in his being branded by many as a Nazi sympathizer and even an anti-Semitic. Roosevelt on the other hand was often labeled a war monger who wanted to throw America's youth into a war on foreign shores. Both men were continually assailed in the court of public opinion, by leading politicians, newspapers, and private citizens all of whom had their own agendas. The book describes the intense political infighting between Roosevelt and Congress, between members of both parties in Congress, and between special interest groups trying to influence both Roosevelt and Congress. You can't help but see the strong similarities to the political power struggles that are currently incapacitating the government today. It is very eye opening to see how various pressure groups and individuals tried to manipulate other people and events to achieve their own goals. This is an excellent companion book to the author's earlier book, Citizens of London: The Americans Who Stood with Britain in Its Darkest, Finest Hour. This book provided for review by Amazon Vine and the well read folks at Random House.