Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk
4/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
Recent polls suggest that fewer than 40 percent of Americans believe in Darwin’s theory of evolution, despite it being one of science’s best-established findings. More and more parents are refusing to vaccinate their children for fear it causes autism, though this link can been consistently disproved. And about 40 percent of Americans believe that the threat of global warming is exaggerated, despite near consensus in the scientific community that manmade climate change is real.
Why do people believe bunk? And what causes them to embrace such pseudoscientific beliefs and practices? Noted skeptic Massimo Pigliucci sets out to separate the fact from the fantasy in this entertaining exploration of the nature of science, the borderlands of fringe science, and—borrowing a famous phrase from philosopher Jeremy Bentham—the nonsense on stilts. Presenting case studies on a number of controversial topics, Pigliucci cuts through the ambiguity surrounding science to look more closely at how science is conducted, how it is disseminated, how it is interpreted, and what it means to our society. The result is in many ways a “taxonomy of bunk” that explores the intersection of science and culture at large.
No one—not the public intellectuals in the culture wars between defenders and detractors of science nor the believers of pseudoscience themselves—is spared Pigliucci’s incisive analysis. In the end, Nonsense on Stilts is a timely reminder of the need to maintain a line between expertise and assumption. Broad in scope and implication, it is also ultimately a captivating guide for the intelligent citizen who wishes to make up her own mind while navigating the perilous debates that will affect the future of our planet.
Massimo Pigliucci
Massimo Pigliucci is K. D. Irani Professor of Philosophy at the City College of New York and the author of, among other books, How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life (2017).
Read more from Massimo Pigliucci
Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Making Sense of Evolution: The Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Biology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations (Warbler Classics Annotated Edition) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Nonsense on Stilts
Related ebooks
Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Paradigm Shift: How Expert Opinions Keep Changing on Life, the Universe, and Everything Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDoes Science Undermine Faith?: A Little Book Of Guidance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsContemporary Mind: Some Modern Answers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience Unlimited?: The Challenges of Scientism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKarl Popper, Science and Enlightenment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Fallacy of Scientific Truth: Why Science Succeeds Despite Ultimate Ignorance Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Hermetic Science of Transformation: The Initiatic Path of Natural and Divine Magic Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Pragmatism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsZeno and the Tortoise: How to Think Like a Philosopher Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Problem of Truth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophy and Physics: A Reconciliation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience and the Good: The Tragic Quest for the Foundations of Morality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Psychedelic Apes: From parallel universes to atomic dinosaurs – the weirdest theories of science and history Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Failures of Philosophy: A Historical Essay Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Quantum Physics and Ultimate Reality: Mystical Writings of Great Physicists Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDestination Of The Species: The Riddle of Human Existence Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Lawless Universe: Science and the Hunt for Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEight Preposterous Propositions: From the Genetics of Homosexuality to the Benefits of Global Warming Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Hope and Knowledge: A Skeptic’S Response and Other Reflections Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow the Great Scientists Reasoned: The Scientific Method in Action Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScientific Uncertainty, and Information Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophy of Science: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Makes Us Think?: A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Tools for Young Philosophers: The Elements of Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Farewell to Reality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Extra Sensory: The Science and Pseudoscience of Telepathy and Other Powers of the Mind Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Weirdness!: What Fake Science and the Paranormal Tell Us about the Nature of Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Contact with the Other World - The Latest Evidence as to Communication with the Dead Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Biology For You
Gut: The Inside Story of Our Body's Most Underrated Organ (Revised Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Letter to Liberals: Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dopamine Detox: Biohacking Your Way To Better Focus, Greater Happiness, and Peak Performance Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Grieving Brain: The Surprising Science of How We Learn from Love and Loss Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Soul of an Octopus: A Surprising Exploration into the Wonder of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Winner Effect: The Neuroscience of Success and Failure Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5All That Remains: A Renowned Forensic Scientist on Death, Mortality, and Solving Crimes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5"Cause Unknown": The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Woman: An Intimate Geography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lifespan: Why We Age—and Why We Don't Have To Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anatomy 101: From Muscles and Bones to Organs and Systems, Your Guide to How the Human Body Works Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Obesity Code: the bestselling guide to unlocking the secrets of weight loss Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Peptide Protocols: Volume One Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mother of God: An Extraordinary Journey into the Uncharted Tributaries of the Western Amazon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fantastic Fungi: How Mushrooms Can Heal, Shift Consciousness, and Save the Planet Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Blood of Emmett Till Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Trouble With Testosterone: And Other Essays On The Biology Of The Human Predi Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Written in Bone: Hidden Stories in What We Leave Behind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Mortality: An Intimate History of the Black Death, the Most Devastating Plague of All Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fatal Invention: How Science, Politics, and Big Business Re-create Race in the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Other Minds: The Octopus, the Sea, and the Deep Origins of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ultralearning: Master Hard Skills, Outsmart the Competition, and Accelerate Your Career Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Your Brain: A User's Guide: 100 Things You Never Knew Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Nonsense on Stilts
23 ratings5 reviews
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5With such a great title, I sort of expected this book to disappoint. It didn't. The author delivers a solid critique of pseudoscience and irrational thinking, explaining in the process how science is done and giving a good argument for philosophy and history, as well. There are a couple of week spots, particularly in the chapter on scientism where he makes some pronouncements without any real evidence, but for the most part, it is well thought out, well researched, and well written. It should be a vital part of the library of evrey thinking person (and is needed even more in the libraries of those persons who tend not to think too much).
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As the title indicates, the main focus of this is supposedly on the "demarcation problem," that is, how to draw the line between valid science and pseudoscience. I'm not entirely sure how well it achieves that goal, as a lot of what Pigliucci discusses doesn't seem to me to work towards answering that question in any clear and immediate way, although he does tie it all together reasonably well, if very briefly, in his concluding chapter. I also wouldn't say that this is the book I'd recommend for an in-depth discussion of pseudoscience and its characteristics. Most of his specific coverage of that topic consists of some very cursory case studies of individual psuedoscientific beliefs, although his chapter on the famous Dover case (in which a school board attempted to mandate the teaching of creationism in the guise of "intelligent design") is good. (He also has a decent, if perhaps slightly dated, discussion of global warming, although I'm not entirely sure about his choice to, effectively, present his arguments about the subject in the form of a pair of book reviews.)Where this book is really worthwhile, though, is in the chapters on the philosophy of science -- unsurprisingly, perhaps, considering that this is Pigliucci's main field of interest. These chapters include a thought-provoking examination of the difference between "hard" and "soft" sciences, a history of scientific thinking from the time of the ancient Greeks, and a critique of the extreme postmodernist view of science as having nothing to do with objective reality. I found these chapters fascinating, and very much appreciated Pigliucci's nuanced and thoughtful approach in discussing the powers and the limitations of science as a human endeavor.Rating: Despite some unevenness, I'm giving this one a 4/5. If this is a topic you're interested in, the worthwhile parts are very worthwhile.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5With respect to the subtitle of how to tell science from bunk, Pigliucci sadly fails to make his case. Sure, there are extensive side trips into differentiation between examples of science and pseudoscience (i.e., evolution vs creationism/ID), but only to illustrate a very specific point rather than a general approach, and he really doesn't address the "how" - for the most part he merely contrasts and states one is science and the other is not. Too easy for proponents of bunk to pick apart (and too easy for proponents of intelligent reason and science to pick apart.)
There is one rambling chapter on logic, philosophy, and the history of science that does nothing to achieve the subtitle. Description of inductive vs deductive schools of thought (a waste of a chapter focusing on philosophical BS) without application is rather silly. This is not to say that Pigluicci is not right, rather, the knowledge conveyed is useless.
A common theme, he offers no real tools to apply to generic instances. This is a collection of sometimes interesting, if verbose, observations about specific contrasts. And a standard pattern of this book is a disjointed soft segue into something purportedly connected to the preceding chapter, followed by an Emeril-ish BAM! of a not quite sequitur sidebar.
One of the better questions posed was whether one needed to be an expert in both science and pseudoscience to be able to tell the difference, but as per the previous chapters, Pigliucci quickly diverged to explaining what constituted an "expert" rather than answer the question. While claiming to provide a way to tell science from bunk in the last chapter, he actually is giving a way to tell bunk "experts" from possible scientific experts. That has value. But not how he thinks.
Mostly unsatisfying, and sadly so. But he gets an extra star for skewering and roasting Deepak Chopra. That was fun. If short. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This book is relevant to everything going on in society today, especially as concerns the public perception and interpretation of scientific news and advances. Today you don't have to look hard to find someone peddling some new miracle cure, or claiming that they've discovered some new secret to the universe. And much of this is presented right along with the latest in scientific discoveries on your favorite news channel. But how do you tell the difference between what's really true, and what's utter bunk? That's what this book is all about; it lays out the different criteria one can use to determine what is science, and what is pseudo-science, or even out right nonsense (with or without stilts).The book is broken up into several sections starting with an examination of the differences between science, fringe science, and pseudo-science. It then examines the discussion of science within the media and how the outreach of some scientists to the media has fared. It further explores the history of science and the relationship it has with philosophy, as well as the future need for the philosophy of science. It ends the book with a look at what criteria we the public can use when trying to determine someone's expertise in a particular area of science in order to determine who we should trust when evaluating claims.In general the book's writing style was engaging and keeps you moving along, as opposed to other similar books that tend to be a bit dry and sometimes difficult to get through.; there is even a bit of wit and humor thrown in from time to time to keeps things light. The topics are handled without the need for a heavy knowledge of science and I found it to be highly accessible for the general public. If you find yourself struggling to determine which claims are correct, and which are not, among the many news venues available, this book is a good remedy for that.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5With such a great title, I sort of expected this book to disappoint. It didn't. The author delivers a solid critique of pseudoscience and irrational thinking, explaining in the process how science is done and giving a good argument for philosophy and history, as well. There are a couple of week spots, particularly in the chapter on scientism where he makes some pronouncements without any real evidence, but for the most part, it is well thought out, well researched, and well written. It should be a vital part of the library of evrey thinking person (and is needed even more in the libraries of those persons who tend not to think too much).