Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISBN 9966-9757-0-5
Printed and bound by Primex Printers Ltd. P.O. Box 11590 - 00400 Nairobi, Kenya Tel: 554595 / 550543, Fax: 553010, Email: primex@bidii.com
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or produced or utilised in any form or any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the author or authorised agent.
Reading is a pursuit open to everyone, rich and poor alike, and a source of infinite and unfailing pleasure. True, reading is but one form of what may best be termed "the cultivation of the spirit", but while the literature is not life, it is essential to complete living. A love of books is the sign of a cultivated man or woman as intellectual curiosity is the true test of education. A room without pictures has been likened to a house without windows. What, then, are we without books are they not the window's of the spirit? A book-lined room is better than the most palatial interior.ii W.E. Simnett Footnotes i. Clarance Day, Golden Gift Collection, compiled and edited by O.P. Ghai, (Sterling Publishers Private Limited) p. 5. ii. W.E. Simnet, Golden Gift Collection, compiled and edited by O.P. Ghai, (Sterling Publishers Private Limited) p. 8.
CHAPTER TWO: WESTERN BANTU 1. ABALUYIA Sub-Groups i) ABABUKUSU ii) ABALOGOLI iii) ABANYOLE iv) ABAMARACHI v) ABASAMIA vi) ABATIRIKI vii) ABAKEKHE viii) ABAWANGA ix) ABITAKHO x) ABISUKHA xi) ABATSOTSO xii) ABAKISA xiii) ABAKHAYO xiv) ABANYALA xv) ABAKABALASI
NB: In this book, Aembu and Ambeere have been treated as one group, which they are and Cuka as Ameru CHAPTER FOUR: EASTERN BANTU Coastals 9. WATAITA 10. WATAVETA 11. WAPOKOMO 12. MIJIKENDA Sub-Groups i) WAGIRIAMA ii) WADIGO iii) WAKAUMA
CHAPTER FIVE: NILOTES Highlands Nilotes 13. KALENJIN Sub-Groups i) KIPSIGIS ii) NANDI iii) TUGEN iv) POKOT v) MARAKWET vi) KEIYO vii) SABAOT (Kony, Pok/Bok, Bongomek, Sebei)
Plain Nilotes 14. MAASAI 15. SAMBURU 16. JEMPS 17. ITESO. 18. NUBI 19. TURKANA
CHAPTER SIX: CUSHITES OROMO 21. BORAN 22. GABBRA 23. SAKUYE 24. ORMA 25. BURJI SAM SPEAKERS 26. SOMALI 27. RENDILE 28. ARRIAL
CHAPTER SEVEN: HUNTER/GATHERERS 29. YAAKU 30. DAHALO 31. ELMOLO 32. WAATA (WATA) 33. AWEER (BONI) 34. LOWLAND NYIKA 35. NGIWAKINYANG 36. IK 37. NGIBOTOK (NKEBOTOK) 38. DASSENECH - SHANGIL 39. OGIEK
40. WASWAHILI 41. ABAJUNI 42. ARABS (WAARABU) 43. ASIANS (WAHINDI) 44. EUROPEANS (WAZUNGU)
FOREWORD This colossal work describes the histories and characteristics of Kenya's ethnic communities. It is now accepted that ethnicity is a universal phenomenon. It has persisted from time immemorial and it is not about to disappear. What is ethnicity? Different people have different ideas about this word which is also associated with ethnic group. Ethnicity is the feeling of belonging to a particular ethnic group. In this book an ethnic group is taken as group of people who believe and identify themselves as sharing some qualities. These include a common origin, a common history and historical experience and heritage, a common culture and its cultural values and practices, a certain philosophy, religion and totems. They also claim to have a core territory that they may describe as a homeland or ancestral land. Some of these terms may need some explanation. In his book Creating Ethnicity: The Process of Ethnogenesis, Eugeen E. Roosens says that ethnicity is worldwide. It is found among some communities in Europe like Belgium, France and others. In all the Americas, Canda, the U.S and Latin America ethnicity is as powerful as ever. Furthermore in Asia and its many Islands ethnic groups abound. Finally, in Africa, virtually all peoples belong to some ethnic group or other. Historically some scholars and philosophers have argued that ethnicity was bound to die as new social classes came up. For example, Karl Marx argued that it was futile for one to belong to an archaic cultural group like ethnic group instead of becoming a worker. However, ethnic groups have not died nearly two hundred years since the birth of the German Scholar. One of the reasons why ethnic groups and ethnicity have persisted is because they imply some kind of equality. There is no hierarchy in the membership of an ethnic group. It does not matter whether one is a professor, a multi millionaire, a coffee farmer or picker, or a casual worker on a construction site. As members of an ethnic group all are equal and the intensity of their ethnic feeling is the same. In concepts like class, these are the high class, the middle class and the low working class. Even Marx
himself recognised a category below the working class: the Lumpen class. (Lumpenproletariat) Every ethnic group claims a common origin for its members. However, it must be pointed out that there is no blood relationship between the original supposed founder of the ethnic group and the members of the group. In fact, they inter-marry within the group. But through ideology and the type of education they pass over to the children, every member grows up with the belief that they came from one source. The core territory is important. However, not all members live in that territory. Some scholars like Le Vine and Campbell argued in their book entitled: Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes and Group Behaviour, (1972), that the `homogeneous tribe or ethnic unit' was the creation of colonialism and missionaries, I do not agree entirely and as Wang[h[ Ng'ang'a's work has demonstrated very clearly, ethnic groups existed in Kenya long before colonialism. In fact the only such case of ethnicity being created by colonialism was in Rwanda and Burundi. Colonialist Belgians attached an ethnic label on the terms Tutsi, Hutu and Twa. In the precolonial period the Tutsi and Hutu were socio-economic categories and not ethnic groups. On this see Mworoha's very well written book: The Kingdoms of the Great Lakes and Husband Mark's book: The Skull Beneath the Skin. Taken positively, ethnic identity is part of the cultural and social diversity of any African country. People identify themselves with their ethnic groups for tangible economic and social interests. They feel the pride and the assurance of belonging. The ethnic group, through its multifaceted activities, is a kind of social security. It offers many advantages that the government, the Church or the social class cannot offer to the individual. Members of an ethnic group often exhibit certain characteristics peculiar to their group. It is in this positive context that Wang[h[ Ng'ang'a has assembled all this knowledge about Kenya's ethnic communities. Historical experiences have helped cement ethnic groups together. The past victories over their enemies, the defeats they suffered, the wealth they accumulated or the epidemics and other calamities they might have suffered, are all fondly remembered through their language, whether oral or written. These events and experiences feature in the
oral literature, in the Proverbs riddles, poems, epics and many other forms of expression. The historical experience is part of their total heritage that is passed on from generation to generation. The heroes are remembered for the new generations to emulate; the valour, courage or special qualities. Taken negatively, however, ethnicity can be manipulated by leaders for their selfish ends counting on ethnic loyalty. Some leaders appeal for political support. The members also fall in the trap and extend the idea of exclusive enjoyment of their cultural right (The UN Declaration of Human Rights and UNESCO's concern for the cultural rights of a people) to the exclusive enjoyment of economic and political interests that belong to citizens in a given country. Elite members of a given ethnic group can have an excessive access to the country's assets. We have argued elsewhere that in Africa, the ethnic group that has the access to national finance `grid' (state finance capital) excludes other ethnic groups from the same, causing tensions. On this see my conference paper entitled: "Social Differentiation in Kenya, 1963 2004." It is obvious to-day that virtually all the wars in Africa fought over the last fifty years or so, have been sparked by ethnic chauvinism. Examples are many: the cases of Rwanda and Burundi pitting the Tutsi against the Hutu is heartrending. The 1994 genocide in Rwanda was a terrible climax. The Temne and the Mende in Sierra Leone have fuelled an armed conflict there. The Ibo's revolt in 1966 led to the civil war in Nigeria. In Southern Sudan ethnic and racial chauvinism fuelled the longest civil war in Africa. We welcome wholeheartedly the work of Wang[h[ Ng'ang'a. He has used the ethno-linguistic approach to the study of Kenya's peoples. The work has taken over seven years of research. The author has divided the book into a total of eight chapters. The main clusters are Bantu, Nilotes, Oromo and Sam, and then what he calls urbanite group. Chapter one is the Introductory, in Chapters Two, Three and Four, the author discusses the Bantu Speaking peoples. He deals with the Nilotic Speakers in Chapter Five and in Chapter Six the Cushitic Speakers and HunterGatherers are covered as well. Chapter eight is devoted to the Urbanities. The sub-clusters are the Bantu who are further sub-divided into the Western, Central and Eastern sub-clusters. Then the
Nilotes. These are further divided into the Highland Nilotes who are basically the Kalenjin speaking sub-clusters, then the Plain Nilotes. These are the Maasai and the Turkana, Samburu, Njemps, Iteso and Nubi. The final sub-cluster is the Lake/River Nilotes. There is only one group in this category, the Luo. Chapter Six discusses Cushitic speaking peoples of Kenya. They are sub-divided into the Oromo and the Sam speakers. The Oromo speakers include the Borana, Gabbra, Sakuye, Orma and the Burji. The Sam speakers includes the Somali, Rendille and Arrial. Hunter-Gatherers are the subject of Chapter Six. They include the Yaaku, Dahalo, Elmolo, Waata (Wata), Aweer (Boni) Lowland Nyika, Ngiwakinyang, the IK, Ngibotok (Nkebotok), Dassenetch (Shangila), and the Ogiek. Finally, what Wanguhu Ng'anga'a calls the Urbanities are a collection of peoples who may have nothing in common except that they live in towns. They defy the definition of ethnic group. They are Waswahili, Arabs, Abajuni, Asians and Europeans. The author has done a thorough job and his symphatic approach to the study of every ethnic group is worthy a lot of credit. It is a book that every library and learning institution should have. It is an ethnic encyclopedia of Kenya. In all Mr Ng'ang'a has given the histories and cultures of forty four (44) ethnic communities of Kenya.
Sources Sithole, S.: Political Conflicts in Zimbabwe, CODESRIA Seminar Paper, Nairobi, 1992. Osaghae Eghosa E.: Ethnicity, Class and Struggle for Power in Liberia. Roosens, Eugeen E.: Creating Ethnicity: The Process of Ethnogenesis. Sage Publications, London, 1990. Husband Mark,: The Skull Beneath The Skin. Africa After the Cold War. Westview, Press, 2001. RN. Ismagilova: Ethnic Problems of the Tropical Africa; Can they be solved. Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1978. Ahluwalia Pal & Zegeye Abebe, (Eds.) African Identities: Contemporary Political and Social Challenges, Ashgate, 2002.
Simiyu V.G.: Social Differentiation in Kenya, 1963-2004. Paper presented at the Conference of The Historical Association of Kenya, Baringo, Kenya, 2004. Ellis Stephen (Ed.), Africa Now: People, Policies and Institutions, James Carey Ltd. 1996. Prof. Vincent G. Simiyu, Associate Professor of History, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
CHAPTER ONE
Introductory Khoi-san (Khoikhoi) Writing about the hunter-gatherers in the Lake region, Professor William Ochieng has said: We learn from linguists and archaeologists, however, that in the last millennium B.C, a people like the Khoikhoi of South Africa sometimes called `bushmen' were scattered in the plains and higher parts of Nyanza. The majority of these hunters and gatherers were later displaced by pastoralists who came to Nyanza with their cattle from the direction of the Ethiopian Highlands.1 Writing in the Kenya Museum Magazine Kenya Past and Present, Daniel Stiles has stated: The archeological record tells us that much of East Africa and the Horn was occupied by hunting peoples before the arrival of Cushitic pastoralists. Linguistics suggest that Khoisan speakers did occupy part of eastern Africa before the arrival of the various present day linguistic groups. Ehret (1974) has proposed that pastoral southern Cushites expanded into East Africa beginning by at least 2000 B.C displacing and/or absorbing Khoisan-speaking hunters. The presence of Dahalo in a small area of Lamu District adjacent to the Boni suggest that at one time this area contained both Khoisan and Southern Cushitic speaking peoples. The Dahalo today speak a southern Cushitic language that contains a dental click, thought to be a residual Khoisan trait, and they have traditions indicating a long standing occupation of the area (i.e. no migration legends, and traditions of having been there before any of the surrounding peoples.) (Ehret 1974: Stiles 1980 ) Hadza/Sandawe Writing on the Hadza/Sandawe in the Kenya Past and present magazine, David Stiles has recorded: The hunters-gatherers of Kenya probably spoke languages related to Sandawe and Hadza, heard today only in Tanzania. Some Hadza are still hunter-gatherers and the Sandawe were in the recent past. The classification of the languages is debatable, but because they contain clicks, most linguists think they are directly related to Khoisan, the language of the Khoi and san (`Bushmen') in southern Africa. The pastoralists descending the Rift Valley probably spoke southern Cushitic. Those coming in from Sudan and Uganda presumably spoke southern Nilotic that later gave rise to Kalenjin.1 In step with the main message in this book, Stiles concludes his article by stating that: Since these phenomena have been happening in Kenya for the last 3000 to 4000 years, there is no such thing as a "pure" tribe. Except for the most recent immigrants, it is safe to say that all tribes in Kenya contain a mixture of Bantu, Kalenjin, Eastern Nilotic and Eastern Cushitic elements, with a small amount of Southern Cushitic and Hadzan thrown in. Linguistics and comparative
Bantu Historians have provided evidence that the place of dispersal of the Bantu peoples' language is the Congo Niger complex. According to Greenberg, as quoted by Professor Ochieng, the most convincing evidence is that which is based on geographical location of the most closely related languages. He has referred to the analogy made by W.R. Bascom and Herskovits in Africa on the basically similar methods that may be used to establish the homeland of the English language as being similar to finding the originating home of the Bantu thus: In similar fashion, the relationships of Bantu point, first to the Nigeria and the Cameroon's, and finally, to the Niger _ Congo family, whose distribution centres is West Africa rather than in East Africa.1 Professor R.W. Ochieng on the same subject has written: According to Joseph Greenberg, Peter Murdock, Malcolm Guthrie, and Roland Oliver, it would appear that the original dispersal zone of the Bantu speaking people was contained within the Congo-Niger complex. Influenced by his discovery of a number of apparently unrelated West African languages, Greenberg, concluded that the "pre-Bantu" families originally lived in the Cameroon and Nigeria area, where they probably spoke some "pre-Bantu" language. If it is assumed that the Tiv, Batu, Ndoro, Bitare, Mambila and Jawara dialects are the vestiges of some earlier language, fragments of which were absorbed into various languages at some time in the pre-historical period in West Africa, then Greenberg says that such a language might also have been the source of "Proto-Bantu". We have therefore to imagine from the above assumption that the speakers of the "pre-Bantu language" moved in two directions, some to "proto-Bantu" area "in the bush country to the south of the equatorial forest," and others to West Africa.2
CHAPTER TWO
Western Bantu (Abaluyia, Abagusii, Abakuria, Luo-Abasuba)
Abaluyia The Luluyia-speaking people occupy the Western Kenya Province, Samia in Uganda, Bukedi and Bagisu districts plus a small extension of territory into Busoga district also in Uganda. There is little difference between the Babukusu of Kenya and Bagisu of Uganda, and there is none at all between the Samia of Kenya and the Samia of Uganda. The Banyuli of Uganda are of the same stock as the Banyole of Kenya. The Lake Bantu of Tanzania parted from some of the Abaluyia of Kenya somewhere in Uganda long time ago. The Bahaya are particularly akin to the Abaluyia and their language is not far removed from Luluyia spoken in Kenya. The Bukoba of Tanzania are of the same clan as the Bukoba of Samia in Kenya. There are pockets of Nilotic-speakers in Luluyia-speakers' areas in both Kenya and Uganda. In Uganda they are Iteso and Badama (Jopadhola) respectively. The Iteso of Kenya are an off-shoot of the Iteso who live in the Teso district of Uganda. Maragoli tradition has it that they came from Misiri [Egypt?] and are believed to have descended from a group known as Soba during their stay in the northern part of present-day Sudan and a portion of present-day Egypt. John Osogo on this has written: On the map, the suggested area of origin of the Baluyia has been marked astride the Nile comprising a section of the northern part of present-day Sudan and a small portion of presentday Egypt. This whole area lies over what was once known as the land of Kush (Kash). Note that Serra and Kurru were important places at that time. Note also Soba; what connection could this have with the Maragoli, who say they came from Egypt, and are believed to have descended from a group known as Soba? These are all fairly wild guesses, but they are worth thinking about.5 The Abaluyias' Adam and Eve counterparts of the Jews appear to have been Akuru (or Kuru) and his wife Muka who are also known as Mwambu and Seera. According to A.J. Akell in his book A History of the Sudan from the earliest times to 1921, places known as Seera, Dongola, Merowe, Kuru and Soba existed before the Birth of Christ. these places are in the areas which the Abaluyia relate to their origin or migration route from Misiri. it would appear reasonable, therefore, to accept the Misiri legend of origin as being grounded in authentic historical experience. Furthermore the Abaluyia traditions of migration from the north, from Misiri or Abyssinia (Ethiopia) is corroborated by other Bantu traditional histories. Paul Aseka Abuso, writing about the origin of the Abakuria, has stated: Mt. Elgon district is also important in the tradition of various Abakuria clan's claim that at that time their ancestors who had earlier come from `Misiri' were living on the northern side of Lake Victoria.
How the Empire Split Nabongo Osundwa who was the father of Kweyu and Wamukoya was the cause of the quarrel between the two brothers as he was misled by the royal servants to believe that his eldest son Kweyu was not concerned about his deteriorating health. As he lay in his deathbed, he sent for Kweyu many times, but apparently since the servants did not want the arrogant Kweyu to inherit the throne as they preferred Wamukoya, his messages never reached Kweyu. Any time Kweyu asked the servants what his father's state of health was, they replied that "he was just as you left him" giving the impression that Nabongo was not dangerously ill. Osundwa gave up waiting for "unconcerned" Kweyu, as the servants had hoped, and bequeathed the throne to Wamukoya. By the time Kweyu at last came calling, his father had already died and Wamukoya had already performed the ceremony of spearing the bull in the traditional manner, and people had shown allegiance to him. In anger, Kweyu declared that Osundwa's body would not be taken to Matungu for royal burial as had been done to the previous Nabongos. He insisted that the Late Nabongo should be buried at Eshimuli near his home, but Wamukoya remained the confirmed Nabongo. Kweyu declared himself the supreme chief of Wanga Mukulu and though he was never recognised as Nabongo, he ruled Wanga Mukulu independently of Wamukoya till he died. He was succeeded by his son Sakwa, whom the German explorer Carl Peters found on the throne of Wanga Mukulu in 1890. Sultan Sakwa Apparently the Wanga Mukulu chieftanship or sultanate was well-run and impressed Carl Peters who signed a treaty with Sakwa. Carl Peters wrote the following:
Thomson also wrote: I arrived at the town of Sundu [Kwa Sundu]. This place under the father of the present chief was one of great importance and size; but since his death has gradually dwindled away, till the wall encloses more Matamma field and grass patches than huts. The inhabitants, under an effeminate prince, have no special advantages, and consequently prefer to live in smaller villages to be nearer their fields. Nabongo Mumia helped the British to establish colonial government in Nyanza Province. Most of the Abaluyia sub-groups like the Ababukusu and Kakalewa, for example, were brought under control by Wanga chiefs under Mumia's orders. It is possible that if Mumia had not foolishly listened to advice from some Swahili Moslem friends at Mombasa to refuse to go to England for the coronation of King Edward VIII in 1902, he would have acquired the same status as that of the Kabaka of Buganda whose regent Apolo Kagwa went. On reaching the coast on his way to board a ship for England, the Swahilis, who had influenced him at Mumias with Islamic religious ideas, approached him and told him that he was being fooled and that if he went, he would be killed. As it was, Mumia gave up the voyage. In 1909 he was made Paramount Chief, which in effect was only a nominal title, from which he retired in 1926. Mumia died on 24 April 1949 with what had remained of his kingdom. ABAGUSII The Abagusii are a Bantu ethnic group which occupy the most southerly portion of the cool fertile western section of the Kenya highlands. Their language places them within the family of the Bantu-speaking majority of sub-equatorial Africa. The present Gusii homeland consists of an elevated plateau which rises to the south and east to altitudes of over 2000 metres above sea level and is cut into wide flat-bottomed valleys by the Kuja river and its tributaries. The plateau extends over 200 square kilometres with a mean altitude of 2250 metres above sea level. Between the Abagusii and Lake Victoria are the Nilotic Luo. To the east and south-east they are bordered by the Kipsigis and the Maasai respectively. To the south, though separated by a corridor of Luo, are the closely related Abakuria. Abagusii in their traditions acknowledge their close relationship with the following peoples: the Abakuria, the Abalogoli, the Ababukusu, the Abasuba, the Ag]k[y[, the Am]]r[, the Aembu, the Ambeere and the Akamba. Their tradition also has it that on their way from the country which they call `Misiri', they were also accompanied by the Baganda and the Basoga besides the above mentioned peoples. The Baganda and the Basoga are said to have branched off from the rest of the immigrants around Mount Elgon, taking a south-westerly direction. The Ag]k[y[, Am]]r[, Aembu, Ambeere and Akamba are said to have travelled eastwards towards the central highlands of Kenya, while the Ababukusu appear to have remained around Mount Elgon. The remaining clusters the Abagusii and the Abalogoli migrated southwards following the River Nzoia valley and arrived near Lake Victoria between 1490 and 1520. Following an easterly course along the lakeshore, they settled at the head of Goye Bay in Yimbo location of Nyanza with their homeland spreading across present day Ulowa, Sare and Unyejra at the foot of Ramogi hill. Luo migrants found them settled in this general area.
ABAKURIA The people now known as Abakuria are of diverse origins and clans. Before the twentieth century they did not know themselves as the Abakuria but by either their various clans or by "provinces" from which they came. The name Kuria seems to have been applied to the whole group by the early colonial Chiefs mainly to distinguish them from the other Luoised groups along the southern shores of Lake Victoria who were known as Abasuba a name which at times also included the Abakuria proper.
Each of the Kadimo ruoths controlled the chiefdom through a territorial council called Buch Piny. This council consisted of the leading elders from the major Yimbo clans both Luo and Bantu. These elders were called Jodong dho udi. The war leader of the ruothdom, or Osumba Murwayi, was also a member of the council. The council dealt with major political, judicial, and economic matters affecting Piny, or the routhdom, like murders, cattle thefts, trade and interclan disputes, famines, pestilences, invasions, defence, trade and inter-clan conflicts. There was also an inner cabinet of the buch piny which was composed primarily of elders from the routh's clan, as well as a few leading experts like jobilo (diviners), jotheth (blacksmiths) and jojimbo koth (rainmakers). This inner council was called buch dound ruoth or buch oganda ruoth. It advised on major and sensitive policy issues of state like who should be the army leader, when should war be declared, who should be allies or which clan elders, or magicians were a threat to the security of the routhdom.
CHAPTER THREE
Central Bantu(Agikuyu, Aembu(Ambeere, Ameru, , Akamba) Agikuyu The Ag]k[y[ are the largest community in Kenya and the largest group in the African continental context of the North-Eastern Bantu. They form the largest part of the population in Central Kenya, the neighbouring city of Nairobi and are the second largest group in the Rift Valley Province. The Agikuyu are also found all over Kenya, especially in towns, where they live and work as traders, artisans and professionals. The Agikuyu ancestral and spiritual homeland is in the present central Province. Natural landmarks mark the boundaries of the area. To the north is K]r]nyaga (Mount Kenya); to the west is the G]k[y[ escarpment of the Rift valley, which merges to the north with the Nyandar[a range, and to the east and south is K]anjah] hills (Ol Donyo Sabuk) and K]ambir[ir[ (Ngong hills) respectively. The ancestral area is well watered and dissected plateaus of approximately 160 kilometres in length from north to south and 50 kilometres in width from east to west. The area tilts southwards from the mountainous and hilly north to the Mbeere and Kaputiei plains, the direction in which numerous parallel rivers and streams flow into the Thagana (Tana) and Athi rivers, causing deep narrow gorges. As a result, the dominating feature of most G]k[y[ country topography is that of a trenched and denuded plateau of ridges and valleys. The area has ample rainfall, which averages from 1750 mm in the highlands and 1000 mm in the lower lands per year. This rainfall comes in two rainy seasons per year; the long rains falling between March and May and the short rains falling between mid October and December. The temperature of the area is generally moderate. The Origin As will be seen later in this chapter, the Ag]k[y[ people on entering the Mount Kenya area rapidly and extensively absorbed people of other communities they found in the area and it seems that through this process of mutual assimilation, their earlier history beyond this period became blurred and eventually forgotten in their traditions. What is distantly remembered is that they came from the north and Abaci (Abyssinia) is definitely mentioned as a place of origin. However, other Bantu peoples from Western and Nyanza provinces in their traditions remember association and contacts with the Ag]k[y[; contacts which took place earlier before these people's entry and sojourn in Mount Elgon, Lake Baringo, Lake Nakuru and Mount Kenya area settlement. On their origin, migration and relations with the Western Bantu and others, Professor William Robert Ochieng has written: The traditions of the Gusii people indicate that in the distant past they were the same people as the Kuria, the Logoli, the Bukusu, the Suba of south Nyanza, the Kikuyu, the Meru, the Embu, and the Kamba. They farther state that on their way south from a country which they call "Misiri", they were together with the Ganda and the Soga. The Ganda and Soga are said to have branched off from the rest of the migrants around Mount Elgon in a south-westerly direction. The
An equally believed story of Embu origin is that they came from a far away land beyond Meru and settled in the present land. Some specify the place of origin beyond Meru as Tuku or Ethiopia and others Uru. They say that when the first bunch of the Embu came they were in company with the ancestors of the Mbeere. Taking into consideration that the Ag]k[y[, Aembu, Ambeere and Cuka travelled together as one congerie into the Mount Kenya region, a northern home of origin for the Ag]k[y[ is suggested. Professor Godfrey M[ri[ki in a book titled A history of the Kikuyu, 1500-1900 has written: First, a tiny minority of my informants believe that the Kikuyu were descendants of the Baci or Ethiopians; or descendants of the Rendille man who came from Meru and settled at Gathanga; or that the Turkanas and Baci are relatives of the Kikuyu. The Abaluyia and Abagusii who say that they were in Misiri with the Ag]k[y[, Aembu, Am]]r[ and Akamba also mention Kuru or Akuru in relation to their stay in Misiri. According to A.J. Akell in his book A history of the Sudan from the earliest times to 1821, places with the names Seera, Dongola, Meroe, Kuru and Soba existed before the Birth of Christ. Evidence is, therefore that many Bantu peoples living in present-day Kenya had lived together in the distant years, that is therefore the birth of Christ, in some part of north-eastern Africa, and passed through some parts of Ethiopia (Baci _ Abyssinia) during their movement to the south. It is interesting to note that the Gurage people of Ethiopia who excel in business and farming look and act in a similar manner like the Ag]k[y[. They also came from the north, which is presumed to have been Meroe (Misiri?) which was defeated by Aksum armies at about A.D. 350. Aksum (Axum) is in the present day Ethiopia. They first settled in Gura in the present Eritrea before spreading to the south. The Ethiopia publication Spectrum Guide had the following to say about the Gurage: The area of the Gibe River for hundred of years has been the homeland of Ethiopia's most remarkable and industrious people the Gurage. of mixed Semitic and Hamitic stock, they probably migrated here from further north in the long forgotten past. They have made themselves at home in the southern highlands and have evolved a uniquely vigorous and self reliant economy. It is probable that the Gurage may have left Meroe (Misiri?) before the Ag]k[y[ congerie through Eritrea and settled in Ethiopia. They are generally referred to as Ag]k[y[ of Ethiopia. It may appear incomprehensible that the Ag]k[y[, who are believed to have been the dominant community in the group consisting of the Am]]r[, Aembu, Ambeere and Akamba during the migration from Misiri to Mount Kenya area to have `forgotten' their distant past history almost in total and to have adopted the myth of origin from M[k[r[e wa Gathanga. It is believed the legend served as a focus or symbol of unity, thereby welding together the various disparate elements into one people from heterogeneous origins. The Abaluyia, Am]]r[, Kalenjin and Mijikenda have similarly invoked myths which legitimised the occupation of their present localities during the last few centuries and which strengthened their communal cohesion and identity in order to meet new and in particular external challenges. On this Ochieng W.R. has written:
Land in most cases was occupied and finally acquired on a ridge basis, each pioneer in the pioneering group settling along his own ridge or area. In nearly all cases, land acquisition was on the basis of who occupied it first and initial economic activities carried on it. Consequently, people claimed to have acquired their land by trapping animals (kwamba m[tego) or clearing of the virgin forest (kuna k]r]ti). Land could also have been acquired through marriage, as it was customary for in-laws to provide land temporarily where necessary. Land could also be forcibly taken as blood fine payment in lieu of livestock. Land once acquired remained the property of an individual and subsequently of the descendants of the original pioneer. These descendants maintained a strong sense of community and shared values. This formed the birth of the ancestral land and Mbar] (clan) tenure of land rather than communal or individual ownership. Communal rights were restricted to salt-licks, public pathways (nj]ra cia agendi) or firewood collection places. Land acquisition in Kabete was in some cases similar to the situation in Metumi and Gaaki. In some parts of Gat[nd[, an area of Kabete (K]ambuu) which neighbours Metumi, for example, clearance of the land was the basis for land ownership. Existence of large concentrations of Athi (Asi) colonies in the rest of the Kabete area led to the adoption of other methods of acquiring land. In these areas, it was necessary to create friendship with the Athi before any land transaction could take place. Once mutual understanding was established, the Athi sold land to the Ag]k[y[ or allowed them to occupy it, especially where they were adopted into families by the Ag]k[y[. Adoption Before a land transaction took place between a M[g]k[y[ and a Mwathi, a ceremony of mutual adoption took place. Within the G]k[y[ tribe, any person who stole the property of any member of the tribe, killed or wounded or otherwise harmed such a person, became liable by law to criminal proceedings. If any M[g]k[y[, therefore, killed or harmed an adopted Mwathi, or, for that matter, a Mwathi from whom he proposed to purchase land, he would be held responsible in G]k[y[ law and would be punished. At the same time a Mwathi, who had laws similar to those of the Ag]k[y[ on such matters, bound himself to treat the M[g]k[y[ who had adopted him as a brother and fellow tribesman. The ceremony of adoption was followed by the ceremony of showing the land boundaries. A typical example of land purchase by a M[g]k[y[ from a Mwathi is given in Dr. Leakey's book The Southern Kikuyu in the form of an Elder's story, a true narration by Mzee Kabet[ wa Wawer[ thus: Not long after I had married my second wife the Ndorobo hunter announced that he wished us to start making payments for the land, and he fixed the amount that we were to pay at 700 goats and sheep. Every member of our family began to assemble his contribution and we made up a herd numbering 460 goats and sheep, which we handed over. Then we gave the Ndorobo hunter the Mwati wa Njegeni (virgin ewe for the stinging nettles; or compensation for getting stung when pushing his way through the bushes see glossary), and he marked out our boundaries. The south-east side of the boundary ran from the Gitathuru River up through the depression where there were some Mukurue trees, and thence to Kandutha. From there the boundary ran straight down to the Gitungiti River. In the north-east our boundary started at the big rocks by the Runguthiu River, so that our boundary in this direction matched with that of the family of wakaruugi.
We were left with a debt of 240 goats and sheep and sixty stall-fattened animals (ngoima) to pay, for we had paid only ten ngoima to start with. After about three planting seasons we paid over these 240 goats and sheep and the sixty ngoima, and completed the deal. As has already been seen elsewhere, a solemn ceremony of mutual adoption (g[ciar[o na mburi) preceded purchase of land from a Mwathi. This was a legally binding transaction as they owned the land. Dr. L.S.B. Leakey has testified thus: The fact that the Wandorobo used their land only for hunting and did not cultivate it does not in the least invalidate their claim that the land was theirs to sell. Nor does it mean that they did not sell the land, or that they merely received compensation for the loss of hunting rights. It would be as unjust to deny that the Wandorobo were the owners of their land as to claim that the moors and deer forests of Scotland do not belong to those who hold title deeds for them. When the members of a Mwathi family sold their hunting lands to the Ag]k[y[, the senior members of both the Athi and G]k[y[ families had to call in witnesses, and these sales were effected with the knowledge and consent of the Athi leaders. They were not simply casual negotiations by individuals, unrecognised by law from both sides. Social and Political Organisation The most fundamental basis of G]k[y[ social and political organisation was the family unit. Many of the most important religious and social ceremonies were invalid if any member of the family was absent. Individuals, therefore, were constantly required to subordinate their own plans to the welfare of the family as a whole. The family unit, which was of the greatest significance to the individual, was the immediate family, that is the members of a single homestead (m[c]]), but the greater family (ny[mba) was only slightly less significant. The G]k[y[ family system was an inclusive one, and the classificatory system of relationships meant that everyone was catered for. Dr. L.S.B Leakey has written thus: In the average Gikuyu homestead, the bonds of friendship and love which linked a man, his wives, and their children were very strong. For example, although from every animal that was slaughtered there were certain joints that belonged by right to the women, and yet others to the men, it was seldom that a father did not give bits of his own portions to his children and his wives. Furthermore the anxiety that a father showed if a child was ill, or that a husband felt if his wife was not well, was just as great among the Gikuyu as among Europeans, even if it was manifested somewhat differently. The G]k[y[ family was the centre of all religion, and family worship was more important to the Ag]k[y[ than public worship, which was conducted only on very special occasions. It was from the parents that every child learned about God and about the spirits of the departed. Similarly, it was from their families that G]k[y[ children obtained most of their moral education imparted through stories and riddles. Fathers spent much of their evenings talking to their sons, and mothers to their daughters. Girls learned to do agricultural work, to cook and to help their mothers in other domestic chores; they prepared themselves to become future mothers by looking after their small brothers and sisters. Boys learned how to look after livestock, and were prepared for the future defence of the country and for raiding the Maasai for livestock.
The all-embracing and institutionalised mariika (age-set) system that cut across lineage and territorial groupings was more important than all other considerations including the sentimental notion of belonging to Mbar] ya M[mbi or even external threats in uniting the Ag]k[y[. While oral traditions do not give a clear picture of when the G]k[y[ began to adopt the mariika system, we have clear evidence that the mariika system was practised by the Ag]k[y[ in the seventeenth century. In the G]k[y[ age system, the word riika may refer to four different age groups. In its broadest and most general sense, riika means a generation. Professor M[ri[ki on this has written: I am not concerned here with riika in the sense of age grade, which is a status role commonly ascribed to individuals at a certain age and in many societies. My concern is with riika in the sense of age sets or age groups, which are coeval, corporate groups whose members are recruited through specific criteria. This word is not at all precise, as shown in chapter 5 and this may have been the source of confusion depending upon the context. it may refer to generation (moiety), or to three slightly different kinds of initiation sets, comprising either all the neophytes who underwent circumcision in any one year, or an army embracing several initiation sets, or an army contingent embracing several initiation sets, or an exclusively female initiation set. The moiety or generation set was charged with the responsibility of running the group affairs at any given time and its term of office began with a hand over ceremony, the Itu]ka. This took place every thirty to forty years, during which one generation handed over to its successor the reigns of power to conduct the political, judicial, and religious functions. The alternating moieties were Mwangi and Maina (Maina was also known as Ir[ng[) and members were recruited according to first born sons, who in any case were named after them. The moiety names Maina and Mwangi were only applicable to the living generation; those generations which had died off were given a definite name which encapsulated the most outstanding feature of their period or rule, e.g. Manjiri, Mamba, Tene, Agu, Mand[ti, Cuma, Ci]ra, Mathathi, Ndemi, Iregi, and Maina in that order of seniority. Mwangi, which took over from Maina/Ir[ng[ in 1898, should have transferred power to Ir[ng[ between 1924 and 1932. This it did not do and it has not yet done due to colonial disruption of traditional G]k[y[ institutions. Riika (Initiation) Riika in its more restricted sense meant an initiation set comprising of boys and girls who had undergone circumcision in the same year. Circumcision was the only criteria for membership in this riika category. Several such initiation sets were grouped together to form a contingent of an army. Such an army contingent or regiment was also a riika and was given its own name. A m[hingo (closed period) when no male was circumcised was regularly imposed after every nine years in Gaaki (four and a half calendar years) and five years in Kabete and parts of Metumi (two and a half calendar years) in order to raise a large number of warrior recruits at a time. Professor M[ri[ki on this has written: The former system the Metumi system was based on a Muhingo (closed period), which lasted for nine imera (seasons) or miaka (years) four and a half calendar years during which no initiation of boys took place at all. But it should be noted that initiation took place in the tenth kimera (season) which in effect meant that it took place after five calendar years, since as a rule initiation took place only during the themithu after the mwere (millet) harvest. This was followed
As time went on Karuri was to become my friend and right hand supporter while I in turn was to have an influence over him and his people which was to raise him to the position of a great chief and myself to supreme power in the country a virtual king of the Gikuyu. One of the chiefs, Wang[ wa Makeri, one of Makeri's wives, a Kar[ri agemate was a woman who became a chief simply because Kar[ri spent nights at her house on the way to M[rang'a, the district headquarters. Such chiefs became extremely unpopular, especially because they had to enforce unpopular measures and they exercised their authority by autocratic and high-handed methods. Kar[ri decreed that before the traditional m[hingo could be lifted for boys to be circumcised, any prospective initiate had to pay him a rupee, an idea that other chiefs emulated. Any person who refused to obey the chief and his njaama was beaten, his home burnt and livestock seized and there was nowhere to appeal. McGregor in respect of the period 1906-1907 observed thus: Under the present arrangements, the njama consist of all the rogues of an enormous district who have the chief's permission to enter. It is an engine of oppression because by means of it, the Government headman can punish any district which does not, as he thinks, listen to him viz, allow his young men to do as they like there. The njama entering a district divide themselves up, and each decides upon the village where he will make his home for the time being. During the time he condescends to remain there, he is like the owner of the village, the owner himself is but his servant, and is condemned to sit up and watch that the fire does not go down while his lordship is sleeping smugly in his bed. If the fire goes down the poor man has to pay a fine of a sheep or is beaten by the whole band in the morning. The women of the village become for the time being the property of the visitor. Every day a sheep has to be killed, and the njama live like kings. McGregor was not alone in condemning the chiefs and their hangers-on. Dundas also noted that "it has become a heinous crime to dispute the authority of the so-called chief" and that "their authority was only sustained through the fear of the government. At the same time, their chief aim was to enrich themselves and to secure their newly invented authority." One observer said: They [the chiefs' hangers-on] had no official salary and consequently had to live on the people. Wherever they went they commandeered whatever they fancied food or livestock. They even ordered girls to sleep with them. They went to the extent of killing people and if anyone protested, their village would suffer. On chiefs' excesses, an observer has written thus: The chiefs overreached themselves and took other peoples' wives and property by force to teach them `kutii sheria' (to obey the law). People had to cultivate in their fields without pay and if they refused they were in trouble. The behaviour of the chiefs and their hangers-on were the [cause of the] first complaints voiced by the early politicians. Quite a number of them were dismissed as a result of this, including court elders who took bribes.
Ambeere Social and Political Organisation In an Embu homestead (m[ci]) the father was the overall head; the mother was second in authority and was also responsible, assisted by her daughters for the domestic welfare of the family. The father and sons were responsible for looking after livestock and the primary defence and protection of the family. Grandparents were respected and obeyed by the parents and the children. In case of the death of a father, the eldest adult son took over authority including the role of sharing out of the fathers' wealth among his brothers assisted by the clans elders. Each individual or family (ny[mba) belonged to an extended family (sub-clan) and several extended families belonged to a clan (m[v]r]ga). Several sub-clans were members of the two major clans of the Embu the Irumb] (Gatavi) and Thagana (Ngua). These two main clans formed the tribe. Members of all the clans, after Nduiko or political power handover ceremony belonged to either one of the generation age-sets Kimathi or Nyangi. In Mbeere the Irumb] clan is known as Ndamata and Thagana as M[r[ri.
Above the authority of the head of the family was the clans council of elders who were selected on the basis of their knowledge of the clan's traditions and property ownership. The clans could make their own rules and execute them among the members. No person could sell clan land without the clan's consent, and clan members paid their clan dues when they performed circumcision and marriage ceremonies. Members of the clan's councils of elders were called Athamaki in Embu and Aciiri in Mbeere. The councils operated from ridge to ridge of habitation. Ambeere Social and Political Organisation The Ambeere structure was similar to that of the Aembu except for some details. The father was the overall authority at home and had to be involved in all major decisions on matters concerning his family such as circumcision, marriage, feasts and sharing of his wealth among his sons. The mother was second in authority when the sons were young but when the sons attained maturity her authority passed on to the sons in order of their seniority. The eldest son was accorded the same respect accorded to the father. Due to the relief and topography of Mbeere country, people were organised in villages as opposed to ridges as in Embu and each village had its government consisting of clan leaders, leaders of village warriors and male circumcisers. Above all, the oldest man in the village was given special recognition and was consulted before any decision was made. He was the village guardian and custodian of tribal secrets, laws and traditions. The village government made laws and regulations about accepted behaviour, education and general conduct in the village and acted as the judiciary. It also made arrangements for the maintenance and supervision of highways in its locality and for the opening or closing of them. This body also regulated food procurement and borrowing during the frequent famines in the area. These village councils are still operating in a very similar form with slight alterations and their members are called Ac]]ri. Mbeere clans are still very strongly held together by traditions. Elders Courts of Justice Although at times in Embu and Mbeere some people took the law into their hands and avenged themselves as individuals or in groups, there were courts of justice in the land. The established way was to sue the alleged offender before a court of elders who would hear the parties concerned and if they considered the matter to be more serious than they had the authority to settle, they would refer it to a higher council for hearing and determination. The litigants also had the right of appeal if any of them was not satisfied with the first council's ruling. Every person, young or old, was allowed to sit in court and hear the proceedings and air their views but not everyone participated in arriving at the verdict. The decision was made by a "consultation group" of wise men Ndundu who sat aside after both parties had been heard to summarise the evidence and reach a decision. The parties to the litigation then took an oath to abide with the verdict which was bidding for all jointly. The Ndundu would then deliver judgement in an open court. When decisions could not be reached from only hearing evidence, the council would resort to ordeals and oaths. The most senior court of justice K]ama k]a Ngome dealt with criminal matters only and its members were also members of other councils. They sentenced to death witches and dangerous criminals and called upon Njaama ya Ita to execute their decisions. They wore ngome, which was a half-tubular metal ring on the right hand middle finger in Embu and on the right hand little
Social and Political Organisation A homestead (m[sy], pl. m]sy]) was the smallest social unit. A homestead was usually a stockade around the home of each married man, which contained the huts of his wives. Outside the entrance of several family homesteads was a thome, a shaded open space, where men sat and discussed everyday events. Thome was the basic political unit. A thome could have been shared by several joint families and in the political sense referred to a group based on an extended family with possible attached households, which may be of different clan affiliations. In some cases, components homesteads constituting a thome may not be in sight of one another. The head of the family within the homestead (m[sy]) was vested with authority and, in theory, had control over all members of the group, including adult males with families of their own. The m[sy] council was responsible over land ownership and was the group that carried out vengeance for offences committed against its members if judgement penalties were not paid. It was common for adult men to hive off the m[sy] and set up independent homesteads if they disagreed with the family head. Initiation Akamba circumcision or critoridectomy was performed when the initiates were as young as four or five years. To become a full adult member of the tribe, a man or a woman had to undergo two initiation ceremonies nza]ko ]la nini (the small circumcision) and nza]ko ]la nene (the great circumcision). The candidates for the second nzaiko were generally between eight and twelve years old. Both boys and girls were taken to a specially erected hut in a thome where they stayed together receiving ritual and practical instructions from instructors. The boys underwent a second operation a slight cut being made at the base of the glans penis and beer poured into it. There was also a "third circumcision". The participants in the third nza]ko or the "circumcision of the men" were bound by an oath of secrecy. Lindblom speaks of the great difficulty of getting any information on the subject and Hobley learned very little of the true nature of the rite. The ceremonies took place far away from the homestead in special huts near rivers and were performed by men who had already undergone the ceremony. Elders Council The Akamba had institutionalised age-grades which had political and ritual functions. These agegrades, however, were not connected with physical circumcision ceremonies as among the Ag]k[y[. The larger political unit called [t[i was the territorial cluster of joint m]sy] under nzama or elders' council. Nzama was and still is formed of atumia (elders) but not all elders took part in its deliberations as there were three categories of elders. The junior-most were the atumia a k]suka who took part in war discussions and were responsible for peace maintenance, carrying out public executions and the disposal of corpses. They paid ten goats or one bullock on entering k]suka eldership. The top two grades of elders form the nzama, the administrative and judicial council of the [t[i. The nzama is also known as atumia a nzama or atumia ma ithembo with the inner council known
CHAPTER FOUR
Eastern Bantu ( Coastals: Wataita, Wataveta, Wapokomo, Mijikenda) Wataita The Taita people occupy the mountains in west-southern Kenya now known as Taita Hills with the Dawida on the higher slopes and the Sagalla and the Kasigau on the almost uninhabitable surrounding plains. The administrative district includes the Taveta sub-district inhabited by a distinct community, the Taveta. The Kasigau people live around the great dome of the Kasigau hill and the Sagalla around the small Maungu Hill which joins with the imposing Sagalla ridge south of Voi town, which is the main settlement of the Wasagalla. Some thirty-two kilometres to the north-west is the main cluster of the real Taita Hills rising from the undulating plains, carrying the bulk of the tribe (Wadawida). Hived off from this cluster but not actually separated from it, is Mbololo hill. Facing the Serengeti plains and Kilimanjaro is the Mwaktau hill. Outside the district there are two colonies of the Taita people in Usambara Mountains in Tanzania and Taita have also penetrated into Pare, Chagga and Taveta. Taita trading parties often went to Chagga and Usambara via Taveta and that is when some Taita settled in colonies among the Shambala. Clanspeople of the Wanya, one of the Taita clans, claim that their ancestors are also the ancestors of some of the Pare and this is corraborated by Pare traditions. Of the surrounding people, the nearest who used to loam over the surrounding plains, and sometimes to come right up to the foot hills of Taita hills were Wakuavi Maasai (Wamasae in Kidawida). The name Taita brings together three communities namely the Dawida, the Sagalla and the Kasigau, all who lived among the MijiKenda in Shungwaya before they migrated to their present home south of the confluence of the Tsavo, Athi and Galana rivers in a region east of the Tanzanian border. The Kitab al Zanuj has listed among the Kashur (peoples) in Shugwaya the Tita (Taita), Kadhiyaru (Kadiyaru) and Dara (Ndara) which correspond to the Taita present settlement locations at Dawida (Tita), Sagalla (Ndara) and Kasigau (Kadiyaru). Writing on migration from Shungwaya, Professor Thomas T. Spear has recorded: The Swahili called the Singwaya people the Kashur (a name still used for the Mijikenda by the Pokomo and Waata) and recall they were first found along the coast near Brava. After some time Arabs coming from Mogadishu drove the Kashur to the south, where some settled in the Juba river valley and others occupied Singwaya further south. More importantly, they listed the Kashur in detail and all are readily identifiable as either Mijikenda or Taita. The first four are the Dighu (Digo), Shmuba (Shimba), Lughu (Lungo), and Sifi (Tiwi). These were the people at the Juba; they were the first to migrate to Kenya, and they are all Digo. The remaining Kashur are listed as the Ghiryama (Giriama), Shuni (Chonyi), Kamuba (Kambe), Ribi (Ribe), Jibana (Jibana), Tita (Taita), Kadhiyaru (Kadiyaru), and Dara (Ndara).1 The Taita started their journey from Mwangea in three columns each heading in a different direction. The Taita clan of Wanya is said to have gone upstream along the banks of the Sabaki River to the confluence of Athi and Tsavo rivers and then turned south to the northern slopes of the Dawida range of hills. Meanwhile, they were joined by wandering Akamba who became
Social and Political Organisation The Taita are composed of seven parent clans, five of which are supposed to be of original immigrant groups from Mount Mwangea. The first five are Wasadu, Wanya, Wasanu, Wasasadu and Wanyanya. The other two are Waikumi, representing the Wakuavi Maasai group and Wambisha, the clans incorporating the Dorobo (Ndegere/Ndigiri) original inhabitants. Taita clans are referred to as vichuku. None of the clans is limited to one portion of the hill alone but it is possible to discover regions in which members of one clan are preponderant, for example the Waikumi of Mgange, the Wasadu of Sagalla and the Wanya of Wusi. Clan offshoots have spread all over the hills to such an extent that it would be difficult to find areas where clansmen of a certain kichuku are entirely lacking. The vichuku are patrilineal groups with, it would seem, an additional grouping for females. Every daughter belonged to her mother's clan, the exclusively female clan to which no male could ever belong, the Wakenda (people of the "nine"). The lineage, referred to as kivalo or kichuku, has a span generally corresponding to a depth of four generations. It is a descent group incorporating relations by marriage not only by blood kinship. The kivalo is much more prominent than the clan in everyday life. For instance it is a cult group for affairs concerning the ritual status of its members, their village and their land. The segments of the kivalo, which are the next smallest units in the series of lineages, are known as nyumba ("house"). The nuclear unit in the series of kinship group is the patri-local extended family known as kinyumba. The kinyumba includes the father, his wife or wives, his sons with their wives and children and his unmarried daughters. Its main functions apart from maintaining the close relationships of people who are closely related and giving them a sense of community are economic as it is the principal land and cattle owning unit, of which the head of the extended family is legal representative. The nyumba is a dispersed group within one district; it is religiously self-sufficient in minor cases, and it has special significance as a group providing help, protection and shelter, if necessary, to its women who have married outside it. Cattle for bride price may be expected to be provided by its members and assistance in hut building. The Taita territory was divided into administrative malolo (sin. ilolo) or districts and the boundaries were strips of no-man's land, such as high, bare, uninhabitable plateau, or too steep a slope. In more densely populated parts it might be a small river without natural vegetation in its bed. A. H. J. Prins has described the ilolo as follows: Religious ties exist for the district and are of the same importance. Kinship ties also form an integral part of relationships within it, but neither are distinctive of this unit. The main principles are common territory and political identity, rights over land and conformity of culture. Conformity of culture is a vague expression and the whole body of the Taita shares this principle as a basis for unity, but the district is the smallest unit in which being culturally distinct is both felt and expressed. Rights over land are also held by other units, by kin groups in general and specifically by the Kinyumba. The head of the Kinyumba holds the land rights and owns gardens on its behalf within the ilolo and may acquire any of the available cultivatable parts within the boundaries. Wataveta Taveta has been the home of the Wataveta people for about four hundred years. Originally they arrived in Taveta as refugees and immigrants from population groups living in the surrounding
Colonial Occupation In 1890 Taveta was made a station of the Imperial British East Africa Company and when the East African Protectorate was established, Taveta came under its jurisdiction in 1897. Christian missionaries under Steggall had already made their first visits in the late 1880s. The collapse of the initial colonial administration in the form of the IBEA, had made the people to think of the Protectorate government as a weak and ineffective power that could not be a threat to them. However, it eventually became evident that the new government officials meant not only to settle in Taveta, but to rule over the Taveta as well. When the Taveta people realized this, the Njama consulted a diviner who advised them to bury a white fowl under the government flagstaff during the dead of the night. However, although the government official who was at Ndii died, as was to be expected from the magic spell so cast, another one was posted there and the Taveta gave up hope of ridding themselves of white rule. Once government officials had established themselves other Europeans followed, and this created many problems for the Taveta with regard to their land. The Taveta did not differentiate between the political and economic implications of occupying a territory. To them a political community simply occupied an area and used its resources; the rights of ownership did not differ from the rights of sovereignty. Accustomed to a continual influx of outsiders as immigrants or traders, the Taveta were readily able to adjust to the first European settlers as simply one more group in a long series of
The Wapokomo like other Coastal peoples have a common tradition of origin and migration from Shungwaya, the legendary town or territory supposed to have been situated on the southern Somali coast, somewhere in what is now Jubaland. They occupy the Tana valley in an area that extends from the coast into North-Eastern Kenya. The Tana river, which rises from the southern slopes of Mount Kenya and the Aberdares flows east through north-eastern Kenya, before making a south-easterly sweep to the Kenya coast. Tana River is called Tsana in Pokomo, Galana maro or dima in Oromo, Kiluluma in Kikamba and Gururuma (upper Tana) by the Swahili. Traditions of origin and settlements of the Wapokomo are that Shungwaya must have been the original home of a number of clans, not only of the Pokomo, but also of Taita, Digo, Giriama and Segeju/Katwa tribes. The Wapokomo say that they were friends of the Galla until the latter began to covet their herds of cattle, resulting in wars, which made the Wapokomo to emigrate. They reassembled and settled in a place remembered as Dana Sukutu along the Tana. After some centuries, they were attacked by the Galla. In an ethnographic survey by the International African Institute, A.H.J. Prins has written thus: A more recent version is to be found in the account of the history of the Buu sub-tribe by a literate tribesman. He puts the advent of the Buu ancestor, Sango Vere, in the Tana in the days of Liongo Fumo long before the coming of the Galla (4). His original home was called Mungini or Mundini, in the country called "Inti Kuu" which is situated on the coast some twenty miles north of Lamu. The first attacks from the side of the Galla are supposed to have been directed against the Pokomo who had already been living on the Tana for centuries. Then the Galla came and fought them very much. The Buu were beaten and many of them ran away by way of the hill of Gede.1 The ethnographic survey by the International African Institute which was sponsored by the Colonial Social Science Research Council on the timing of the Pokomo migration had the following to say: The first drive southwards must have occurred either before Liongo Fumo (Boecking) or during his lifetime (Darroch). Liongo is variously placed in the 13th Cenrury (if this is true he must have lived before the coming of the Galla), in the 12th or even 8th century which is difficult to believe. Other accounts make him contemporary with the Portuguese. The only certain date connected with the early history of the tribe is 689 A.D (the foundation of Pate (Patta), the first Arab town on the coast) as Werners' informants were positive that Swahili towns already existed when their first ancestors moved into the Tana valley.2 Wapokomo, who pronounce their name as Wafokomo, are divided into four main groups or vyeti and into thirteen sub-groups. The four groups have distinct identities, territories and dialects. The territory of the first major group, the lower Pokomo, is from Kipini to Bubesa in Salama location; the upper Pokomo occupy the area from Matanama in Ndera location to Roka near Masabuba; the Welwan (called Malakote by the other Pokomo) live in an area extending from Roka to Garissa; and the Munyo Yaya (meaning "Northern Pokomo" in Oromo; other Pokomo call them Korokoro) occupy an area extending from Garissa through Mbalambala. The sub-groups or clans do not seem to have very distinctive characteristics. The names of the vyeti are associated with their long residence in their present settlements. Going down stream the vyeti, are in the following order: (1) Korokoro, (2) Malakote, (3) Malalulu, (4) Zubaki, (5) Ndura,
A.H.J. Pins on Shungwaya has written: Shungwaya is shown on three Dutch maps: Linschoten, 1596, Plaeuw, 1640, and de La Feuille, 1700, and on a British map of 1670 by Ogilby. The spelling are Jungaya, Tungaya or Xungaja and its position is just to the north of Patta. The name is also found in Portuguese documents of 1686 and 1689 (9). The Chinese name for East Africa Tsungpao may also have some connection with the town which must have been much more important before than after the arrival of the Portuguese. Language The Mijikenda speak dialects of a single language, which they attribute to Shungwaya origin. Each of the nine Mijikenda speaks a separate dialect of the same language, which is closely related linguistically and historically to the other languages along the Kenyan and Tanzanian coasts. Over the centuries these languages have slowly evolved from a single common ancestral or proto-languages through a series of intervening proto-language into the distinct languages that exist today. This process of development occurs when people speaking the same language become separated and slowly change their patterns of speech and the single language diverges into separate but naturally intelligible dialects and eventually separate languages. Professor Thomas T. Spear has written the following on Mijikenda languages: Related languages or dialects with a high percentage of common words, or cognates, are very similar and probably diverged from their common ancestor relatively recently, while those with lower percentage of cognates are less similar and diverged from each other at an earlier date. Classified in this way the Mijikenda dialects fall into three groups: Mijikenda A (Rabai, Ribe, Jibana, Kauma, Kambe, Chonyi and Giriama), Mijikenda B (Duruma), and Mijikenda C (Digo). Since the dialects of group A share an average of 77-85 % cognates among themselves, but only 59-64% with Digo, we can say the Digo split from the peoples of Group A at an earlier date than the peoples of Group A split among themselves.3 Traditions of the Bajuni which refer to double-storeyed houses in `Shungwaya' say that its inhabitants left it to go either to Kisimayu or to Kayama, the northern-most of the island settlements off the southern Somali coast. From there they moved south to the other island settlements, then to Bur Gau which they usually call Buri Kavo and into what is now called Kenya. Professor Thomas T. Spear on the Mijikenda Shungwaya period has written thus: The traditions of all the Mijikenda, with the exception of the Rabai and the Duruma, are unanimous in tracing their origin to the region between the Juba River and Singwaya along Southern Somali coast. They lived there with the Taita, Pokomo and Galla until one day a Galla was murdered. Most Mijikenda say the Galla was sacrificed as part of the initiation of the first age-set, but others say that a Mijikenda bridegroom killed the Galla who came to fulfill the ritual duty of initiating intercourse with his bride. In either case, the Mijikenda refused to pay compensation to the dead man's kinsmen and the Galla took retribution on any Mijikenda they found. Unable to defend themselves, the Mijikenda, Pokomo, Taita were forced to flee to the
CHAPTER FIVE
NILOTES (Highland Nilotes Kalenjin, Marakwet, Keiyo, Sabaot) (Plain Nilotes Maasai, Samburu, Jemps, Iteso, Nubi, Turkana) (River Lake Nilotes Luo) HIGHLANDS NILOTES KALENJIN The Kalenjin people form the principal population of Kenya's western highlands in the present Rift Valley Province. The Kalenjin area is bounded on the east by the steep Mau Escarpment and Lake Baringo and on the west by mount Elgon, the Nandi escarpment and the western dip slopes of the Mau Range in the former Kericho District where the land falls away towards Lake Victoria. The width of the region from east to west varies from upwards of a hundred kilometres. From south to north the region is much more extended. from Chepalungu forest bordering the Loita plains, the country extends for more than three hundred kilometres to cherangany mass and the edges of the dry northern plains. The western highlands receive an average of 75 cm of rain per year while Nandi district and central Kipsigis receive twice or more. During their settlement in the Mount Elgon area, people who are today known as the Kalenjin called themselves Miot, Mmyoot or Mnyoot. When they migrated to their present homes, they adopted or were given new names by which they are now known separately. The Kalenjin consist of seven principal groups with numerous sub-divisions within them. The principal groups are: the Kipsigis(Lumbwa); the Nandi (Chemwal); the Tugen (Samorr and Arror); the Pokot (Suk); the Marakwet (Marakweta, Endo, Almo, Kiptani, Barokot, Sengwer or Cherangany); the keiyo; the Sabaot (Kony, Bok or Pok, Bongomek, Sebei or Kisirai Ogiek (Dorobo) are also known as Southern Kalenjin. While the majority of the Ogiek people speak Kalenjin-related dialects, those living next to the Maasai in Narok and Laikipia speak the Maasai language. The Kalenjin as will be shown are a recent phenomenon as far as a mutually accepted collective identity encapsulated in the name `Kalenjin', as a collective name for several sub-groups is concerned. B. E. Kipkorir with F.B Welbourn in their book the Marakwet of Kenya have written: The name `Kalenjin' is not only a recent coinage, it is unpretentiously artificial and political in its origins. Although the Kalenjin as such now consider themselves one people and this is generally accepted as the situation, it should not be assumed that they are a homogeneous group. This is how the use of the name Kalenjin originated. The British colonial government designated and referred to all the Kipsigis, Keiyo, Marakwet etc as the `Nandi-speaking tribes' and were subsequently referred to as Wa-Nandi (plur) or M-Nandi (sing.). Occasionally the Kipsigis were referred to as the Wa-Lumbwa or M-Lumbwa. Non-Nandi
It is not clear why the Maasai did not apply the word Lumbwa to other agriculturists such as the Ag]k[y[ or Abagusii and only to the Kipsigis. The dog (mbwa) factor seems to be the origin of the name and as the Kipsigis country was along a trade route frequented by caravan traders, the Swahiliaised name Lumbwa was popularised, Maasai or Mbwa origin notwithstanding. Social and Political Organisation Clans The Kipsigis are a patriarchal society and, therefore, the father is the head of the family and the children take their father's line of descent. The whole tribe is divided into four main sections according to paternal descent which are: Kipkaige or Kipkwaige; Kasanet; Kipng'etuny and Kebeni about which Dr. T. Toweett has written: These divisions I call sibs and not clans as many people have suggested. To a Kipsigis the English word `clan' means Oret (sub-sib). The main sections or sibs are called boryosyek (singular: boryet). Every Kipsigis man or woman falls into one of these four boryosyek (sibs). Once a woman is married she automatically belongs to the boryet of her husband. Even after her death her spirit belongs to her husband's line of descent. Everyone of the four sibs has many subsections (sub-sibs) which the kipsigis call artinwek (singular oret). No one is allowed to marry within ones' boryet. Many people have gone wrong here by saying that the Kipsigis is an endogamous society, and others, likewise mistaken, have stated that among the Kipsigis exogamy is the rule. As far as boryet goes there is no rule about marriage relationship. As far as the Oret is concerned the rule is that of exogamy. As time went on each of the four sibs increased in number through natural reproduction and partly through adoption and absorption of other peoples. Since custom and habit required that people refer to families by the head of each family, and many other names of family heads came into existence, these family heads formed sub-sibs in their names and the process has continued, on which T. Toweett has written: An attempt to analyse the numerous Kipsigis sub-sibs is similar to an attempt to analyse a bucket full of sand. The most complicating factor of them all is that after every few generations these sub-sibs subdivide themselves further into smaller groups. Therefore as the tribe increases in its numerical strength the sub-sibs also increase in their number.17 People who are said to have a common agnatic ancestor are declared to be kot-ap-chi, i.e. "people of the same hut". Such people may trace their links over three or four generations to common agnatic bonds. People who have never seen each other, whom even the elders cannot link with any common ancestors, are declared to be Kot-ap-chi when they belong to the same oret or clan. Political Organisation The grouping of a number of Kokwotinek has no proper name in Kipsigis as the names Emet, Koret and sirtitiet simply mean place or country. However, one Kokwotinwek covered an area of 4 to 10 or more square kilometres. Their jurisdiction and authority is thus described by J. G. Peristiany:
This area is ruled by the Kirugindet neo with his council of elders, and by the chief of the warriors, the Kiptayat neo nebo murenek. Its religious authority is the Poyot ab Tunda. Those three persons are attached to their territory by very stringent rules, which do not allow them to give their advice, to fight or to perform a ceremony, on behalf of any other Kokwet than those belonging to their group. The inhabitants of this group are linked together, not only by their common interest in the welfare of their group, but also by the rivalry of their warriors and of those of neighbouring groups, which organize wrestling contests against each other. Each Kokwet, as a member of the group, sends its elders as deputies to the Kapkiruok council and has, under the presidency of the Kiruogindet neo, a full share in the government of the country. As each Kokwotinek is independent of its neighbours, when matters of interest to the whole emetwinek (district) are under discussion, each group is represented by its Kiruogindet neo and his chemengesh. Nandi The Nandi-inhabited Plateua extend from Mau (the western wall of the Rift Valley) to the Nyanza Plains. The Nandi also occupy areas below the South escarpment in the middle and lower Nyando Valley and on the North Nyanza Plain at the foot of the west escarpment. The Southern and Western limits of the Nandi Plateau are well defined by granite escarpments rising steeply from the plain below. The South escarpment which towers 2,000 feet (609.6m) extends eastwards from the Southwest corner of Nandi until it merges with the Tinderet and Mau ranges. Its western counterpart rising about 1,200 feet (365.76m) above the North Nyanza Plain, stretches in an unbroken line from the Yala Valley to Broderick Falls and then continues northwards to join the Elgon Masaif 14,000 feet (4,267.2m). The Plateau normally enjoys ample and well distributed rainfall, with a wet season extending from March to October. The ancestors of the present Nandi and Kipsigis migrated from the Mount elgon concentration area through the uninhabited northern Nyanza forests north of Winam Gulf where they settled around Kamoin salt lick. The Bongomek people who were part of this migration remained on the Kavujai hills while some other groups remained at resting places on the way south-east where they were either annihilated or absorbed by Abaluyia groups. Some Kalenjin groups, however, continued their southward migration. The main body left the Winam Gulf area of lake Victoria and ascended the Kakamega escarpment where the section that eventually became the Nyang'ori (Terik) travelled farther north east, accompanied by the founders of the Nandi pororosiek of Kapsile and Kabianga. A. T Matson has written: The section that became the Nandi returned to the plains in the area round Nyoiywai, and then climbed the escarpment to settle at Chemngal and Chebilat. These settlements were established by an Elgony [Kony] named Kakipoch after whom the oldest Nandi pororiet is eponymously named. A few of the more enterprising spirits went south from the Nyoiywai settlement and formed the Lumbwa [Kipsigis].1 Another proto-Nandi contingent migrated to the east and wandered about between the Kamasia hills and Lake Baringo and as far as Rumuruti before settling around lake Nakuru. Here they later encountered the Sigilai Maasai who pushed them back to the Kamasia hills and Elgeyo. While it is not certain whether the eastern migrants left Mount Elgon area before or after the
In Tugen society, several kapish (households) formed a homestead. A household was each wife's individual house with her children and property. A homestead was a husband's house and his wives' houses, the husband's house being the centre of the homestead. Several such homesteads formed a kokwet and several Kokwet formed a Pororiet (plural, pororiesiek). Each pororiet had a council of elders with the mandate to oversee all the political, economic and social issues affecting its area. Every individual in the pororiet lived in accordance with the society's established norms. The formal gathering of the elders had the ritual and juridical authority over the members of the Kokwet. David and Bonnie Kettel have described a kokwet thus: The internal structures of the kokwet, in the sense of people inhabiting the clan territory, comprises local kin groups which themselves have no category name. If the wives of the component local groups are excluded, the remaining members are called collectively kaporet, but agnatically related married females residing elsewhere are also members. The term for a man and
The Hill Pokot are called pi pa pax, "corn people," and the pastoral or plains Pokot, pi pa tic, "cattle people." The Hill Pokot live in the hill country south of the Merich pass which rises to 10,520ft (about 3207.5m) at Mount Sondany and others in the less suitable area north of the Merich pass round Mount Seker 10,950ft (about 3385m). The pastoral Kasauria live in the western plains which stretch towards Uganda and the Katiati of the eastern plains who are the eastern Pokot, extend south-east to Lake Baringo. The Pokot are divided into the following sections starting with the agricultural people of the escarpment, bordering on Chebleng country and Masol: 1. The Cheptulel bordering the Chebleng or Endo who are probably the original nucleus of the Pokot. 2. The Kurut occupy Wei-Wei River area, Maerich, Bongo and Masol. They are also found among the pastoral sections, having attained cattle, as wellas in the hills. 3. The Magan occupy chachai and part of Sakerr and posses comparatively few cattle. 4. Kasauria are found in Chemerongi Hills (Tanduguit and Chemerongit), Korosi, Ribko and Masol. They are an admixer of Karamoja-Turkana and the Hill Pokot and they now speak a semiTurkana Karamoja dialect and have abandoned circumcision. 5. The Kaboheriko occupy Chemerongi Hills (Kirogoh), Chepkariat and Tirioko. They are pastoralists but do a little agriculture. 6. The Kiplegit are said to be part of the main Cheptulel and Kurut Pokot who have become stock owners. 7. The Mnage are in some fashion allied with the Kabcheriko. They are pastoralists who engage in small scale agriculture. 8. The Sekerr hail from the area between Chachai and the Turkwell Gorge at Ramai and are spread along Turkwell River and Kipkomo. They live in mountainous country and have little stock. The sub-sections living to the west of the Kerio are Masol, Cheptulel, Weiwei, Maerich, Kipkomo, Sel, Romai, Kirogoh, Tanduguit, Chemerongit, Bongo and Mnage. And to the east of the Kerio Valley are the following sections: Korossi, Kibko, Kabarma, Tirioko and Barpello. General social divisions of the Pokot population are: Karachoma _ boys; Muren _ full grown men; and Pai _ Old men. Physically, the Pokot are a tall, lean people like the other pastoralists of the "Plain Nilotes" group. Vegetation zones in Pokot country are determined by rainfall, soil and altitude. More favoured
G]k[y[ Factor in Maasai History The dynamics of identity formation and change among neighbouring communities depend on how the boundaries between these communities were first drawn, maintained, adjusted or even dissolved. Both the Maasai and the Ag]k[y[ were expanding during the nineteenth century in ways that were complementary rather than competitive. The Maasai sections involved were those whose patterns of movement took them closer to G]k[y[land the Kaputiei and Keekonyokie in
Social And Political Organisation In the course of a Samburu man's moranhood he performs in a series of Ilmugit or age-set ceremonies with other members of his age-set and clan (club). All the Ilmugit ceremonies have a similar basic form, although those that mark some changes in status as the age-set to become more senior have additional features. Each moran provides an ox for slaughter, or if he is poor and the ceremony is not very important, a goat. Prior to and during the ceremony, the elders address and harangue the moran with the aim of imparting to them a sense of self respect (nkanyit) and honourable conduct among themselves and the community. The ceremony begins in the evening when the moran are summoned over to the elders' enclosure for special blessings and on this night no outsider is allowed to sleep in the hut of the moran. The animals provided by the moran are killed on each of the next four or six mornings depending on the number of the moran involved in the ceremony with each segment providing a certain number of animals on each day. These killings take place in the bush. While on the first morning, the carcasses are being cut up and divided between the various status groups in a prescribed manner, some of the moran build their Ilmugit enclosure where they eat their meat and if they like, sleep at night. The elders take their portions to eat elsewhere in the bush and the women collect theirs and take it to the settlement.
6. Kipeko (initiated c.1837) 7. Kiteku (initiated c.1851) 8. Tarigirik (initiated c.1865) 9. Marikon (initiated c.1879) 10. Lterito (initiated c.1893) 11. Merisho (initiated c. 1912) 12. Kiliako (initiated c. 1921-2) 13. Mekuri (initiated c.1936) 14. Kimanki (initiated c. 1948) 15. Kishili (initiated c. 1960-2) At the time of the Tarigirik age-set, a small off-shoot of the Rendille tribe called Kirimani, which was cattle-owning and Rendille speaking and had close relations with the cattle owning Maasai speaking Laikipiak, similar to that between the Rendille and the Samburu, appeared and Ariaal Rendille attacked them, routed them and seized their cattle. The Rendille proper did not associate themselves with this route of their Kirimani kinsmen and took no part in it. Today, there are many descendants of the Kirimani among the Rendille and they have been absorbed into various clans. On the importance of social groups of the Samburu, Paul Spencer has written: There are seven distinguishable levels in the segmentary descent system of the Samburu. They are the lineage group, the hair-sharing group, the sub-clan, the clan, the phratry and the moiety. Of these, the clan is by far the most significant in terms of social cohesion and shared interests. In contrast to the Rendille whose clans tend to be concentrated in one or a few large settlements, the Samburu clans tend to be scattered over much of the tribal territory in interspersed clusters of small settlements. A number of Samburu clans are segments of more inclusive units, which I refer to as phratries. While the phratry is not a particularly cohesive unit socially, the principle of exogamy is extended to it and it has a ritual significance in the age-set system, each phratry having its own ritual leader. As there were no institutionalised positions of power in Samburu society elders represented the traditional system of authority according to the influence possessed and exercised by prominent elders. Consensus and not the dictates of a select elite, governed Samburu politics. The traditional leaders whom the Samburu did have were strictly ritual leaders, the launon and labarnkeene, his deputy. As has been seen, they were nominated by the elders in the course of the ilmugit ceremony which celebrated the promotion of junior warriors to senior warriorhood. The fuctions of their office were almost exclusively ceremonial.
JEMPS (IL-TIUMUS) Jemps (IL-Tiumus, Chamus, En-jemusi) are Maasai speaking friends and allies of the Samburu. It has been suggested that the Jemps sprang from a Samburu section called Il-Doigoio (Ltoiyo?) in the mid-eighteenth century. But the historical situation appears to be that the Jemps are descended from the Laikipiak Maasai, one of the Il-oikop or Il-Kuavi groups defeated by the IlMaasai and forced to migrate to and settle in an area known as Jemps by Lake Baringo. They adopted the name of the area and became sedentary agriculturalists. There are, however, Samburu clans who claim descent from the Jemps. Paul Spencer on this has written: To give a further picture, acknowledged relationships are also shown between the Samburu and the Tiumus tribe on the one hand and between the Rendille and Odolah on the other. The Tiumus are a Maasai-speaking tribe to the south and east of Lake Baringo, from whom a number of Samburu families claim descent. The Jemps inhabit the area to the south and east of Lake Baringo, an area which Samburu oral tradition claims some of them migrated from about 1840 A.D. They were an agricultural community in the nineteenth century. Andrew Fedders and Cynthia Salvadori have written: When Von Hohnel and Count Teleki passed by Baringo in the 1880s, they counted four Jemps villages. As recently as the mid-1940s the Jemps population was a mere sixteen hundred. Yet the Jemps were so successful in their cultivation that they were renowned purveyors of produce to the nineteenth century caravans stopping at Baringo to resupply before going on to Uganda and the Congo. Or the reason for their success in cultivation may have been that the needs of the caravans gave them the necessary incentive to develop their agriculture.2
As has already been established, the Maasai represent the southern extension of the Eastern Sudanic speaking peoples who moved southward and developed into the Maa-speakers and pastoralist. It has been proposed (Ambrose 1984:87) that Elmenteitans were Southern Niloticspeakers, who may have coexisted with, and later displaced, earlier Southern Cushitic groups in the region. Lack of wild faunal remains and from current Maasai pastoral practice in the region suggest that the Elmenteitan communities of the Loita-Mara region were pastoralists though they may have gained grains through trade (Marshall, 1990:242-243). A number of farming communities had therefore developed in the midst of pastoral areas and such communities practised highly intensive irrigation agriculture. Thomas Spear in the book Being `Maasai' but not `People of Cattle' has written: Arusha was not the only Maasai agricultural community in the nineteenth century. Others existed at Nkuruman at the foot of the escarpment south-west of Lake Magadi, Chamus (or Jemps) south of Lake Baringo, Taveta east of Mount Kilimanjaro and later, Ngong on the edge of Kikuyu. All were oasis communities, occupying small irrigated niches in or on the fringes of the otherwise semi-arid plains. While pastoral Maasai also had relations with the Bantu-speaking agricultural people surrounding the plains, the oasis communities were a unique source of agricultural products in their midst and were themselves either Maasai or heavily influenced by Maasai.
The Iloikop hypothesis holds that there was a division between the purely pastoral Ilmaasai and the semi-pastoral or agricultural Iloikop (Wakuavi). These included the present day Arusha, Parakuyo, Chamus, Samburu as well as the now exstinct Loogolala, Loosekelai and Laikipiak (Jacons 1965:112). However, while the Arusha and Chamus (Jemps) cultivated, there is no evidence that their kin Iloikop were less pastoral than Maasai or that they recognised greater affinity with one another than they did with the `pastoral' Maasai. The struggle between the Maasai and Iloikop was not between different economic forms, but rather a conflict over pastoral resources involving the two sides. By contrast, Chamus and Nkuruman Maasai were like the Arusha Maasai societies. Both spoke Maa and were closely affiliated with adjacent pastoral Maasai. Both farmed on the semi-arid plains, employing irrigation drawn from the rivers or out of Lake Baringo and were involved in pastoralism and fishing as conditions permitted. On Chamus and Nkuruman agriculture, Thomas Spear has written thus: Neither, however, developed into a large or stable an agricultural community as Arusha. Both occupied small, remote, highly restricted environments incapable of expansion, thus making them more dependent on the changing fortunes of pastoralism and the caravan trade. Chamus, for example, expanded considerably from 1840s to 1870s with the influx of many Samburu and Laikipiak refugees from the pastoral wars and the expansion of the caravan trade, but subsequently went into decline with a downturn in trade and loss of population, until floods destroyed the irrigation system in 1917 and people took advantage of the colonial pax to resume herding on the plains. ITESO The majority of the Iteso people live in what was formally Teso District in central Uganda and also in Bukedi District in eastern Uganda. In Kenya, they live in Amagoro in Western Kenya. The Iteso of Uganda are referred to as the Northern Iteso. Ivan Korp has described these people and their language as follows: Linguistically, they belong to the Teso-Karamajong branch of Eastern Nilotic languages. The other branch of Eastern Nilotes is the Maasai-speaking language family, the languages of the Teso-Karamajong, Jie, Dodoth, Turkana, Diding'am, Toposa and northern and southern Iteso. All languages are mutually intelligible.1 The Northern and Southern Iteso have a common migration and ethnic history as well as a similar language. During research carried out by J.B. Webster, a professor of History, assisted by three students, C.P. Emudong, D.H. Okalany, and N. Egimu-O'kuda for the Department of History, Makerere University, the term Ateker was agreed upon to describe all the related peoples who were formerly called Nilo-Hamites. The study found that: The Iteso belong to a family of people which may be called ateker (people of one language). In the past they have been called Nilo-Hamite, which means nothing to the people themselves or Itunga (in the vernacular meaning "all people") or Teso dialect cluster, Karamajon'g cluster or Lang'o family, which inaccurately suggests that they spring from the Iteso, Karamojong or Langi. The Ateker are composed of nine major peoples: the Iteso, Karamojong, Jie and Dodoth in Uganda; the Turkana and the Iteso of Kenya; the Toposa, Jie and Donyiro of the Sudan. The ateker speak mutually intelligible dialects of the same language. They recognise a common origin
The black soldiers were taught Islam during their military training to ensure discipline and loyalty rather than to simply Islamise them as was the case with the Arab conquest and Islamisation elsewhere after the death of Prophet Mohammed. The motive of Egyptian penetration into the Sudan was economic and political conquest. After incurring lavish expenses in Asia Minor, in the digging of the suez canal and in ostentatious expenditure at home, Muhammad Ali looked southwards to solve his economic problems at home, as well as meet the cost of his wars in Asia. The black people's physique inspired him to seek their recruitment into his army. in addition these would be cheaper and would owe him the loyalty of slaves for they would not be recruited by the Khedive on their free will, but to all intents and purposes as slaves. As has already been mentioned, Egyptian colonisation had as its main aim not conquest for development but organised armed plunder against both Muslims who lived along the White Nile in the north and the southern Sudan. The ambition was empire expansion to obtain new resources to fill the empty coffer and improve the finaces under successive Khedives. The Egyptian administrative machinery was manned by officials of many ethnic and national backgrounds, the result being the absence of one national ideology or philosophy of administration. The forceful policy of recruiting the indigenous tribesmen against their wishes
East African Nubi Sociologically, the Nubi community through the years have developed an identity in all the three countries of East Africa. The old generation which preferred to be known as Sudanese, because in the hey days of colonial rule, it was a mark of high status and prestige in society to be known as Sudanese, has now passed on. The Nubi formed the backbone of the British colonial army in eastern Africa. As such their community was associated with power and influence. Many Nubi considered the military profession the most prestigious in terms of achieving social status. This has significantly changed with time. While they are proud of their community and cultural heritage in general, they regard themselves as Kenyans, Ugandans, or Tanzanians which they are. Some factors which influenced the dispersal of the Nubi to where they are today includes the First World War (1914-1918), the development of the East African Railways in Uganda, army transfers and commercial opportunities. When the war broke out, many Nubi came to Kenya from Uganda and some eventually went to Tanzania to fight the Germans. After demobilisation, some chose not to return to their earlier homes and in recognition of their services in the war, they were given plots or settlement parishes. That is how Nubi settlements like Kibera in Nairobi,
It would also seem that the bulk of the group dispersed in the direction of Lake Turkana, probably in search of better land and water for their animals. One group led by a certain Lokerio, who was a medicine man and rain maker, moved directly to the western shores of Lake Turkana where "it subsisted for a time on fishing". Later, according to Bede Odino, this group raided the southern tip of Lake Turkana and introduced the camel in Turkanaland. In the "southward swoop" they came across the Samburu who were pushing northwards and making footholds along the western shores of Lake Turkana. With these people the Turkana fought for land, but there was also a good deal of intermarriage and absorption between the two communities during which time the Turkana became firmly established in what is now central Turkana. J.E Lamphear on the same subject has written thus: At first the Turkana only raided (the Samburu) for livestock (and thereby acquired camels for the first time), but increasingly they began to wage wars of territorial expansion against them. The Samburu and their allies were handed a series of massive defeats and were forced back to Lake Turkana and finally right around the Lake to the east. It is probable that large numbers of them were absorbed by the Turkana. In many cases, they were probably absorbed into pre-existing clans, but many informants also indicate that the Ngimacermukata clan of the Ngimenia division was composed entirely of defeated Samburu and that large numbers of them also joined the large tribal-wide Panga, Puco and Swalika clans. While the Turkana divisions were disputing over the land around Lake Turkana with the Samburu and Marile to the north, another Turkana division which had settled in the heart of what is now Turkanaland in the area immediately to the east of Tarash River, was spreading to the north and also to the south and south-west. The southward expansion brought them into contact with the Karamajong and Pokot both of whom seem to have preceded the Turkana into the area of Lorugum. They fought with both over pasture and watering places but assimilation and absorption of Karamajong and Pokot groups also took place. Lamphear has suggested that the Ngibotok sub-division of the Turkana, today found on the upper Turkwel, is largely derived from the Pokot. Social and Political Organisation Turkana economy which naturally dictates their mode of social and political organisation is dependent on the type of the territory they occupy. An apt description of Turkanaland has been given by Pamela Gulliver and P.H. Gulliver who have written thus: Turkanaland appears from the surrounding Escarpment as a vast sandy plain far below, where the flat scenery is relieved by isolated mountain blocks and where dust devils rise in high columns for most of the day. Lines of trees, which in certain places widen to form a band of thickish vegetation, suggest the course of dry river beds. On descending into Turkanaland it seems at first glance impossible for men or animals to live there. Pamela Gulliver and P.H. Gulliver have decribed the vegetation thus: Desert scrub covers two-thirds of the country, which is hard semi-desert with loose stones and rock on the surface and steep eroded gullies. The only possible vegetation here is the thorntree in many varieties and large clumps of cactus and bayonet aloes, a sharp-pointed sisal like plant.
The thirty-one clans did not simultaneously arrive in Budama and each had its own history and only became part of the same collective historical experience in the process of their occupation of the land. There were certain particular historical circumstances which led to the amalgamation of several more or less related clans into a tribe. The first wave of padhola immigrants travelled together with the last wave of the Kenya Luo (the owiny group) from Fort Atura area via Kabermaido, where they lived for some time. All this time, they were under the leadership of a certain Adhola. We need not dwell on the historicity of this Adhola, as there are so many conflicting accounts about him. Professor Ogot has written: Whichever version we follow all Padhola agree the first settlers formed part of a larger Luo group, a section of which later migrated to Nyanza under the leadership of Owiny. The Owiny and Adhola appear to have stayed in Bukoli for about two to three generations and it is while they were there that a split occurred. One group led by Owiny migrated southwards into modern Samia-Bugwe, where they settled for a short time before continuing into Alego. The group led by Adhola remained behind for a short time before they moved back to west Budama about ten to eleven generations ago or about between 1630 and 1700 A.D. Kenya Luo migrations are basically divided into four large waves which are Joka-Jok, JokaOwiny, Joka-Omolo and Joka-Suba. These waves of Luo migrants settled in Central Nyanza between 1590 and 1790. Joka-Jok Grazzolara's revised version of the migration of the Pajook people seems to agree with the traditions of the Joka-Jok, who maintain that they are related to the Pajook, but also that they came from there. On this Professor Ogot has written the following: If this interpretation is correct, then the Joka-Jok represent a group of Luo people who migrated to Kenya directly without either passing through Pubungu or first settling in Bunyoro. The name "Jock" in this context, probably refers to a place and not to a person. Ramogi may also be another reminiscent name like New York or Cambridge (Massachusetts). If we accept Grazzolara's statement that the area South of the Agoro range was formerly known as Lamogi. Moreover, the same author maintains that the area was inhabited in ancient times by a people called Lamogi or Ramogi whom he thinks belonged to the Western Lango group. These were the people who, together with a few others such as the Padzulu (or Julu as they are known in Nyanza) were absorbed by the Joka-Jok prior to their migration to Kenya. In other words, the group that migrated to Nyanza was already a mixed population, and it is probable only metaphorically that we can regard Julu, Onywa, Onwanya and so on as "sons" of Jok. It is more probable that some of these names are personifications of assimilated groups.11 On this migration, Professor W.R. Ochieng has written thus: Having lived in Busoga for a number of years, they moved on to erect their new homes at a place called Ligala in Samia. They found resident in Samia a number of Bantu `fisher clans' and they lived among these Bantu folk for the next one century, `intermarrying and trading with them'.12
When Jok died, the leadership of the group passed to a young energetic warrior known as Ramogi Ajwang. Due to heavy movement of people from eastern and southern Uganda into the Samia area, the people of Ramogi started thinking of emigrating from the area. Ramogi sent out scouts to the south looking for good land for settlement led by a small but very clever man called Idi, son of Imbo on or about 1590. Professor W.R. Oching has written: They came to a hill many miles to the south of their Ligala settlement, and here they found groups of people who kept large herds of cattle and also caught a lot of fish in the lake and spoke dho mwa (a foreign language). Impressed by this country the scouts went back and broke the good news. A few weeks later, the people of Ramogi arrived in Yimbo.13 The Bantu residents of Yimbo were alarmed by the arrival of waves of Luo migrants and under the leadership of the Abagusii, the Bantu residents of the area, some of whom had lived in the area for several hundred years, launched an attack on the Luo. For one day the battle raged, but by evening the Bantu had lost. The Luo called the hill which they captured from the Bantu got ramogi, or ramogi's hill, which remains the hill's name to the present. The Luo at this time were a nomadic people who moved from place to place with their cattle. Small bands of nomads settled on the periphery of areas inhabited by agricultural populations and as long as there was adequate pasture for their cattle, they maintained a state of co-existence. However, as more waves of Luo immigrants arrived and strengthened the Luo community, they started to engage the Bantu in intermittent predatory warfare and cattle raiding. For a number of years, the Abagusii organised Bantu forces to repel the constant Luo attacks on their homelands without much success. Professor W.R. Ochieng has written: But more and more Luo were arriving in the neighbourhood of Ramogi Hill from the direction of samia and Bunyala and Gusii, Logoli, Abamuli (or Wamuri) and other Bantu clans found it very difficult to defend their homestead and animals against these quick hitting and organized rustlers. Many of the Bantu, including the Gusii, Logoli, abaludhi, Abagowero, Abenge, Ababasi and Abakweri decided that the logical thing to do was to move away.14 Despite the emigration of the Abagusii and some of the Bantu communities, Joka-Jok themselves later were forced to look for more land elsewhere as more and more Luo and Bantu families were still arriving into Yimbo. Professor Ogot has observed: But this peaceful and satisfactory state of affairs seems to have changed about thirteen generations ago, that is, between 1560 and 1640 A.D. The Joka-Jok started to expand eastwards and southwards in small groups which provided the nuclei for later sub-tribes.15 A group led by Odongo hived off and settled in Sakwa Waringa and Alego, another Luo leader, moved to Nyandiwa which was later named Alego. Chwanya, a brother of Alego, led the move from Alego to Uyoma where the people of Chwanya, and Odongo's people lived until towards the end of the eighteenth century when they quarrelled among themselves over cattle thefts and the descendants of Odongo migrated away. B.A. Ogot has written: For about six generations, the Chwanya cluster of clans (Chwanya is the ancestor of the major lineages in Kanyamwa, Kabuoch, Karungu and Kadem) lived at different places in their fertile
It seems that the Jok-Omolo group did not stay for a long time in Acholi and most probably followed more or less the same route that Joka-Jok had followed, passing close to where the present Soroti town is sited and moving in the direction of Mount Elgon to Tororo and Busia. After wandering forwards and backwards in the plains, they settled at Banda in Bukoli country in Busoga between about 1540 and 1800 where they lived for about two to three generations, intermarrying with the local inhabitants. Tradition also claims that it was while this group was living in Banda that the Luo learned how to make kuodi (large shields) which were to be of great service to them in their conquest of South Nyanza about five generations later. When they decided to leave Busoga in about 1800, a small group under the leadership of Gor remained behind, and this group is known as Kogor in Luo tradition and as Wahori (or Wakoli) in Soga history. It appears that they settled in Samia for about two generations in the area around Akek. Jo-Gem moved southwards across Bunyala into Kadimo where, according to traditions they lived for at least three generations. About between 1760 and 1820 they migrated to western Alego under the leadership of Rading Omolo. The history of Jo-Ugenya, the other group within the Jok-Omolo cluster from Banda and their subsequent settlement in Alego, is much clearer and more detailed. They moved in two big waves with the first wave led by Okiyo, Nywa, Teg and Deje who founded the present Koteg and Kanyamwa clans. These clans crossed through Samia to western Alego where they settled at Uhui, Sigoma and Gangu. Owiny launched a serious attack on the new comers, killing many of
CHAPTER SIX
CUSHITES
Oromo( Boran, Gabbra, Sakuye, Orma, Burji) Sam Speakers( Somali, Rendile, Arrial) Oromo Boran The area the Boran (Oromo-Galla) occupy in Kenya includes parts of the Districts of Marsabit, Moyale, Mandera, Wajir and Isiolo; in Ethiopia, the Boran occupy the southernmost parts of the Sidamo province. They are also found in some parts of the Jubaland province of the Somali republic in the vicinity of the Dawa and Ganale rivers. They originated from Dirre and Liban areas of southern Ethiopia. Linguistically the Boran language belongs to the Eastern Cushitic sub-division of the cushitic group of languages, which derives from the main Afro-Asiatic family of languages. In Kenya in addition to the Boran, the Somali of North Eastern Province and the Wardy Galla of the Tana region both belong to the cushitic group of languages. Boran is a corporate term embracing principally three major groups of Borana speakers. They include the Gabbra, Sakuye and Borana Guttu, that is the `Borana proper'. Also closely related to the Boran are the Watta (Waata) people who are descendants of an original hunter-gatherer population. Other peoples who have also played some role in shaping Boran history are the neighbouring groups. These includes the Somali and in particular the Gurreh (Garre) and Ajuran sub-groups of the Somali, the Wardy Galla, the Samburu and the Rendille peoples. Writing on the origin, migration and settlement of the Boran, Paul S.G. Goto has stated: Taking their cue mainly from Cerulli and L.M. Lewis, most scholars of African history accepted as an article of faith the theory that the Galla people occupied the horn of Africa before the Somali, who beginning around the 10th Century A.D, swept south and to the south-west from the shores of the Gulf of Aden and drove the Galla before them. The Galla reached Ethiopia and in the 16th Century overran the greater part of that country.1 According to Haberland and H. Lewis, the origin of the Galla (Oromo) is to be found in the highland region around Bali in South-Central Ethiopia and traditions are unanimous in confirming this. The center of Galla dispersal is traced around the region, which is currently the homeland of the Boran. Paul S.G Goto writing about Boran, Gabbra and Sakuye human and stock movements wrote thus: Hence over the years the vital areas of Boran migrations and settlements were the homelands of Dirre and Liban, and the lowland region of Golbo and Wanyama stretching from the east of Lake Rudolf [Turkana] to Qaddaduma and beyond in the east. It also included Dadasha Waraba as the furthest out post of Boran settlement in the north-east directions, in the lower reaches of the Dawa and Ganale Gudda rivers.
Traditional migration tendencies were increased by disturbances taking place in the horn of Africa as a result of the Jihads by Mohammed Abdille Hassan and the pressure exerted by the Amhara annexation of Boran country under Menelik II in 1897. Many groups migrated to the Golbo lowlands and on to the further reaches of the present Marsabit district of Kenya. Paul S.G.Goto on the occupation of these lowlands wrote thus: We would refer to these as the `low altitude' areas, called Golbo by the Boran and the slightly `higher-altitude' regions, the area traditionally known to the Boran as Dirre and Liban. The latter is the traditional homeland of the Boran and is still regarded as such. The whole of it lies in the Southern province of Ethiopia. The Golbo is that region which coincides with the area below the southern boundary of Ethiopia with Kenya, stretching from the east of Lake Turkana [Rudof] to the region of confluence of the Dawa and the Ganale rivers, in the east. physically, it is set off from Dirre and Liban by an escarpment which roughly coincides with the Ethiopia Kenya border and is called Gorro by Boran.3 Writing on the Boran in the book People and Cultures of Kenya, Andrew Fedders and Cynthia Salvadori had this to say: Kenya Borana are the progeny of Ethiopian Borana. The latter descended from the highlands, abandoned agriculture and adopted a pastoral life-style many generations ago. The Borana move to the lowlands may have occurred around the years 1660-1720. They have been migrating to a greater or lesser degree ever since, and periodically fresh infusion of their fellows have entered northern Kenya. Unlike their relations, the Orma, who remain cattle herding pastoral people, the Kenya Borana have been forced to change to a predominantly camel-herding economy. This recent and relatively drastic change has resulted in part from the progressive desiccation of the Borana environment and in part from the loss of most of their cattle during the shifta (Somali bandit) troubles in the north of Kenya in the sixties. Social and Political Organisation Borana homesteads are grouped into settlements. A settlement may consist of eight or nine homesteads, with the largest grouping up to forty such homesteads. Every settlement has a titular leader who is the head of all the grouped households and that is the extent of the settlement organisation. Communal life and co-operation in a Borana settlement are not institutionalised and social organisation among the Borana is loosely structured. Paul S.G Goto has described social structure of Borana life thus: Among the Borana society the institutions of clan and moiety, age-set and generation set are the vital elements of this feature. Clans and moieties: Boran society is divided into two exogamous moieties; Sabho and Gona. Each moiety is in turn divided into named clans and sub-clans and one of the moieties-Gona moiety is divided into the sub-moieties of Haroresa and Fullale. Like the moiety, Boran clans and sub-clans are without exemption exogamous.5
Below is a break-down of Boran clans and moieties. The Sobho moiety three clans: 1. Karayu; 2. Matarri; 3. Digallu. Karayu is the priestly clan of the Sabho moiety. The Gona moiety is divided into two sub-moieties: The Fullele and Hororesa under each of which are the clans listed below: Fullele Haroresa 1. Oditu 2. Sirayu 3. Galantu 4. Daccitu 5. Kinitu 6. Baccitu 7. Maccitu 8. Arussi 9. Qarcabdu 10. Dambitu 11. Hawatu 12. Nonnitu 13. War Jidda 14. Maliyu
Gabbra Most Gabbra live in Marsabit District but some are found as far north as the Kenya-Ethiopian border area and as far west as the Lake Turkana area. They are camel nomads who herd sheep and goats as well. They are a sub-group of the Boran to whom they are related linguistically and culturally. Their economy is distinguished by the camel rather than cattle, which were the traditional Boran livestock, although this distinction has lost most of its significance today. It is very difficult to determine the origin of the Gabbra people as their traditions are characterised by their vagueness and contradictions. Certain stories pertaining to Gabbra origin are shrouded in myths such that it is difficult to detect any element of historical reality in them. It is possible that these accounts are made up with the deliberate intention of forging an identity between the Gabbra and the Boran by claiming common origin. Establishing the historical facts is a basic problem which confronts every historian who makes use of oral sources, and this problem
While the evidence here may be insufficient to confirm the descent of the Gabbra from the Somali it is likely that the Gabbra and the Gabbra Miigo, who constitute one of the sections of the Sakuye people, originated from the Gurreh at some point in the past before the Sakuye became part of Boran society. It is possible that the ancestors of the Gabbra people might include the Somali, Rendille and Miigo. Also the widely told story of the Galbo Gabbra originating from the Watta cannot be entirely ignored. However, there is enough evidence to indicate that various elements are represented in this group Boran, Sakuye, Watta, Gurreh and Miigo and possibly Rendille. E. R. Turton has written: The first threat to Garre hegemony over the Juba/Tana region seems to have come from the Orma after the latter had reached the coast near the mouth of the River Tana. The Orma then turned north, defeating the Garre and pushing them back to Afmadu, where they were subsequently dispersed. One group moved to Giumbo, near the mouth of the river Juba, but after being repeatedly attacked were forced to cross the river and eventually moved north to Merca. A second group of Garre moved to the coast and then crossed to the Dundas islands, where they sought the protection of the Bajun and were eventually absorbed by them. A third group moved inland from Afmadu, reached the Lorian Swamp and then moved further north. Very little is known about this last migration, though it has been conjectured that it was from this group that the Rendille, Gabbra, Sakuye and Gabbra Migo all have their origin.4 Boran oral traditions have it that the Gabbra were a sub-group of the Boran but emerged as a distinct people, but these traditions do not explain exactly what the status of the Gabbra as a subgroup was. A Boran proverb refers to the Gabbra in conjunction with potters, hunters and smiths. It is best to say that perhaps at one time in the past the Gabbra may have been a sub-group of undetermined status among the Boran, but that today they are a group apart. Andrew Fedders and Cynthia Salvadori writing on the similarities between the Gabbra and Boran have stated the following: Today the Gabbra are a people apart in spite of being Galla-speakers, pastoral nomads and similar to the Boran in other cultural characteristics. In outward appearance, dress and hairstyles and ornamentation, the Gabbra resemble the Borana in most basic respects. The women display a common taste in aluminium ornaments, such as bracelets and necklaces. Aluminium beads, in fact, form the bulk of both Gabbra and Boran women's jewelry. A peculiarly Gabbra ornament though is the double band of aluminium worn by their women around the head.5 Like the Boran, the Gabbra have a gada-system, but it has been reported that they have only three gada groups, whereas the Boran have five. The Gabbra share fundamental religious beliefs with the Boran and it is to the Boran priest to whom they go to receive blessings. The Gabbra Malbe adhere to their traditional beliefs. The Gabbra Miigo refer to themselves as Muslims, at least in their contacts with outsiders. On their social and political organisation, Fedders and Salvadori have written thus: The most relevant sub-division in the daily life of the Gabbra is naturally the residential or settlement unit. The Gabbra settlements are highly mobile residential units, averaging some seventy people and seventeen houses each. Residents may be related through complex kinship ties and marriage bonds. The settlement is not only the basic residential unit, but also the basic political and ritual unit of the Gabbra.
Sakuye Traditions regarding the origins of the Sakuye, unlike those on the origins of the Gabbra are more explicit. The indication here is that the Sakuye people were acculturated into the Boran society at a much later date than the Gabbra. As their name implies, Sakuye came to the Boran from the direction of `Saku' which is the local name for the site of the present Marsabit township and the surrounding area. These people are said to have broken away, together with the Rendille, from the Garre Somali at some unknown time in the past. The two communities had lived together around Mount Marsabit, where the Sakuye left the Rendille. It is not known why Sakuye moved away, although Samburu pressure on them is suspected to have contributed to their emigration. In the meantime, a group of people called the Miigo, who had long been acculturated into Boran society, were camped at Demo Derra, a mountain to the east of the present town of Marsabit where they were performing Boran religious ceremonies. Tradition has it that the Miigo are a break-away Gurreh Somali group who had accepted Boran protection as they were a small group and therefore became fully acculturated into Boran society, although they retained their identity as Miigo in certain respects. The story goes that the group from Saku met the Miigo at Demo and on being asked where they came from, they replied `Saku'. Hence the Miigo called them "Sakuye," meaning people of Saku. The Miigo decided to introduce them to the Qallu of the Karayu clan as he was the authority under whom they also lived. The Qallu gave protection to the Sakuye and asked them and the Miigo to live together as kinsmen thereafter. Necessary Boran ceremonies were performed for the Saku foreigners to be accepted as a friendly group and as members of the group. They were first required to pay certain dues to the Qallu in the form of camels and they were then required to anoint the Qallu every time they visited him as a sign of recognition of his authority as the spiritual leader of the clan and group. Paul S.G.Goto in confirming the Sakuye adoption by the Boran Qallu has written thus: Henceforth, Sakuye came to be known as "Sakuye of the Qallu" and to all intents and purposes were counted as members of the Karayu clan to which the Qallu of the Sabho moiety had initiated them.1 The Sakuye inhabit the general region of Moyale and their principal centre is Dabel on the road to Buna Wajir. The small population is scattered in an area stretching from Moyale region in the north to Wajir and Marsabit in the south. The Sakuye area has no strict territorial demarcations. They maintain a cultural resemblance to the Gabbra. Their economy is based on camel and goat husbandry. Their houses' walls and roofs are covered with hides and mats like those of the Gabbra. The women wear their hair in the Gabbra style. Sakuye culture is fundamentally changing with time. Nomadism is on the wane and they have increasingly converted to Islam during the last sixty years or so. Although the Sakuye look to the Qallu of the Boran for ritual leadership, it is no longer clear whether or not they have a gada-system at all. Andrew Fedders and Cynthia Salvadori explaining the current situation facing the small Sakuye community have written thus: Being numerically so inferior to their neighbors and having suffered greatly during the shifta troubles between 1965-1968, the Sakuye have become preoccupied with peace. They are too few to survive in a fully nomadic and frequently belligerent way of life. Possibly in the near future
All accounts agree on the route taken, though there is some uncertainty as to whether the migration took place under Ana Akr or Bierami Higu. The Orma maintain that they moved south to Moyale and then continued to the Lorian Swamp, whence they proceeded to the river Tana and so to the coast. According to one report, the Orma divided into two at the Lorian Swamp and one part went to Aji, which cannot be identified, on their way to Kismayu. What is particularly interesting is that Orma at no time claim to have come from central Somalia. Burji The actual place of origin of the Burji in Ethiopia is not clearly known but it is thought that they were at one time part of the Amharic peoples of Ethiopia. This view is borne out by various factors, one of which is similarity between the names; one is known as Amhara and the other as Amara. There is also considerable linguistic affinity between the Burji and the Sidamo who are related to the Amhara. Apart from Sidamo language, there is no other language in the whole of Ethiopia, and even among the Galla, which resembles that of the Burji. However, the Burji and the Boran have many common words which are incidental when viewed against the whole structure of the language and may have arisen from the social and cultural contacts between people bordering on each other for a long time and traded. Burji supplied food and cotton cloth manufactured with their home-made hand-looms for which the Boran paid with cattle within the framework of commercial exchanges. Thus certain words became common to both tribes. Ancient Burji were agricultural people who lived around the Burji mountain. Their territory was to the east of the River Galana Amara, and south-east of Lake Abaya. To the west, across the Galana Amara was the Konso country, to the north the Darasa, and to the south and south-east the Boran. The Amara-Burji are divided into two main groups the Burji and the Gubba. The Amhara live in the extreme north-western corner of Ethiopia and next to them is the Gubba tribe. It is difficult to establish any cultural or linguistic affinity between the Gubba in the north and the Burji Gubba. If this could be done, it would help to confirm the theory that the Amara-Burji are in fact an off-shoot of the Amharic people. It would also explain the separate identity and yet sharing of the group name between the two Gubba people. But although the ultimate origins of the Burji are unclear, Burji history from around the middle of the seventeenth century is very well known by the traditional historians who also have rough idea about the movements of the tribe as far back as early sixteenth century. On this, K.A. Mude, a Kenyan Burji himself has written: Round about the early sixteenth century, the Burji seem to have arrived from a northerly direction at a place called Liban in south eastern Ethiopia. They were not alone for there were the more numerous Boran who were part of this general southerly movement. Boran traditional history also tends to support this belief. It is not known how long these tribes stayed in Liban nor why they moved. Some claim that a Boran King and high priest advised the people that if they crossed the Liban river, and want to live on the plains beyond, they would multiply and prosper. It may well have been due to pressure from the north or east. Most legends, however, claim that the migration of the Burji was triggered off by a misunderstanding between the Burji and the Boran.
CHAPTER SEVEN
Hunter-Gatherers ( Yaaku, Dahalo, Elmolo, Waata, Aweer, Lowland Nyika, Ngiwakinyang, IK, Ngibotok, Dassenech, Ogiek) Until about 5,000 years ago, all of the East African territory was peopled by hunter-gatherers who knew the behaviour and habitats of the animals that provided meat, skins and horns which they used for their daily lives. They also knew where and when to find the plants that supplied them with grains, tubers, nuts and berries for food and bark cloth, dyes, cosmetics, incense and medicines. The bands of people moved around the land with the sophisticated knowledge of where to find the stones for tools and whatever else was needed. For each ecosystem, the people adapted to the plants and animals found in the territory in which they found themselves living in. Their social and political organisation was as effective as any other. Daniel Stiles writing in the Past and Present Kenya Museum magazine on the hunter-gatherers in Kenya has written thus: From what has been seen and recorded, it would appear that hunters-gatherers in East Africa were not socially stratified. There were no chiefs nor headmen nor even wealthy people. Food and possessions were shared and distributed according to need. Strict social rules enforced compliance. The male elders, with advice from their wives, made decisions by consesus on community matters such as the next move. Certain individuals, both male and female, could gain prestige and influence within the band by having unusual skill in such things as oratory, wisdom, hunting or curing. Their reward was not material possessions, but favoured access for their families to food and other resources from the redistribution system. While the pre-history of Kenya is contained in fossils, rocks and stone tools in museums, in scholarly conjectures and archaeological excavations, the history of Kenya continues to live in its people and cultures. Andrew Fedders and Cynthia Salvadori in their book Peoples and Cultures of Kenya have written thus on the hunters-gatherers : The most prolonged past of any of the peoples of Kenya is that of the hunter-gatherer groups. It is not so much that some of them may be the survivors of the Stone Age, the direct descendants of an ancestral race once inhabiting parts of Kenya, but rather that elements of stone Age cultures have survived through them and their way of life. YAAKU (MUKOGODO) Yaaku are known as Mukogodo because they live in the Mukogodo forest near Don Dol on the Laikipia Plateau. They are called Dorobo by the Maasai and local European farmers. The Mukogodo themselves prefer to be simply called `Mukogondo' while the government groups them and their co-occupants of Mukogodo area, the Mumonyot, as `Mukogodo Maasai'.
WATTA (WAATA) There are two groups of Watta (Waata) hunter-gatherer communities, with one living in symbiosis with the Oromo-speaking (Boran) pastoralists in northern Kenya while another Watta group is found scattered in the coastal hinterland and is usually known as Waliangulo. The Watta living with the Boran are a case of complete acculturation, more complete than even the case of the Gabbra and Sakuye, although acculturation does not necessarily amount to assimilation. Boran traditions remember the Watta as the original inhabitants of the lands that the Boran occupy today. Among the Boran they are identified with practically every new thing that the Boran first came across including the sighting of new territories or new potential sources of grazing and watering. They are also identified with the founding of the original Qallu by the Boran. Hence to date during religious ceremonies commemorating the founding of Qallu, the role of the Watta is symbolically acknowledged by a gift of one leg of the bull that has been slaughtered for the occasion. The fact that the Watta were the first to see the Qallu is one important factor which has endeared them to the Boran over the centuries. On the cultural level
NGIWAKINYANG Ngiwakinyang have been described by Daniel Stiles thus: Living along the west and southwest side of Lake Turkana, this small group of Turkana-speaking fishing people also hunt hippo and crocodile. They derive from a people that lived in the area before the arrival of the Turkana in the 18th century, and their ancestors might be related to the Eastern Cushitic Elmolo and Dessenech, who have the same lake adaptation. The Ngiwakinyang used to have a taboo against eating goats meat, but today they keep goats and eat the meat. Very little is known of these people. IK The IK are called Teuso by their Eastern Nilotic related neighbours (Teso, Turkana-Karamojong). Early colonial administrators called them Dorobo who noted that they were smaller than their Nilotic neighbours and that their skins were lighter. They live mainly in northern Uganda, but sometimes enter western Kenya to trade or herd the goats of the Turkana. Daniel Stiles on them has written: They are hunter-gatherers and practice a little sorghum agriculture and bee-keeping, an adaptation similar to the Okiek. Their language is Eastern Sudanic that is related to Nilotic, and classed in a tiny group with only another language, Nyangiya. They are remnants of a pre-Nilotic migration, which began in that area 3000 years ago. NGIBOTOK (NKEBOTOK) Ngibotok (Nkebotok) speak Turkana and are hunters and gatherers in the upper Turkwel river basin. Apart from foraging in the thick bush in the Turkwel Gorge area which they find more rewarding, they also practise some agriculture and pastoralism. Daniel Stiles has written: With the dam and reservoir now in existence, their life will change considerably. No study of them has ever been made, though their existence has been known since colonial times. DASSENECH (DASNACHI - SHANGIL) The Dassenech - Shangil (Dasnachi) who numbered 418 in the 1989 population census are an offshoot from Ethiopia at the Turkana border. Dassenech ancestors called `Baz' are thought to have been around Lake Turkana from as early as 2,500 years ago. The Dassenech lived along the north eastern shores of Lake Turkana. Incursions of Gabbra, Samburu and Turkana has forced the Dassenech into Ethiopia, but they come into the Ilet-Koobi Fora area to fish, and further in to raid the Gabbra. OGiek (Dorobo) groups The Ogiek, or Dorobo as they are popularly known are hunters and gatherers found in wide areas of Kenya and to a lesser extent in Tanzania. They inhabit areas of high altitude from about 6500 feet (2580 m) up to 10000 feet (3050 m) in forested environment. The marjority of the Ogiek
CHAPTER EIGHT
Urbanite Dwellers ( Waswahili, Abajuni, Arabs, Asians, Europeans) WASWAHILI The word Swahili is derived from the Arabic Sawahil plural of Sahel. Sawahil usually means `Coastlands' or land of the edge. Writing in their book The Swahili, Reconstructing the History and Language of an African Society, 800 - 1500, Derek Nurse and Thomas Spear have given a most appropriate and befitting description of the people referred to as Swahili in writing thus: Our basic point is that the Swahili are an African people, born of that continent and raised on it. This is not to say that they are the same as other African peoples, however, for in moving to the coast, participating in Indian Ocean trade and living in towns their culture has developed historically in directions different from those of their immediate neighbours. It is also not to say that they have not borrowed freely from others. Arabs have been trading along the coast for a long time and many have remained to settle and to become Swahili. They have influenced the development of coastal culture but the influence has gone both ways and the result has been a dynamic synthesis of African and Arabian ideas within an African historical and cultural context. The result has been neither African nor Arab but distinctly Swahili. The history of the people today known as Swahili and the Swahili language they speak is inseparable from the history of the Arabs and the Shirazi who originally came from Arabia and Siraf in Persia, some of them ending up settling permanently in the East African Coast. The Islamic religion is also a major integral part of this process in creating a new community transcending continental and racial barriers. The oldest known recorded history about the Swahili, long before the Islamic influence is The Periplus of the Erythrean Sea ( c. A.D 130 _ 140) and Ptolemy's Geography (c A.D 150). Many of the rest of the historical records were written by the Arabs in southern Arabia and the Persian Gulf. In addition Al-Masudi who visited the coast c. 915, Ibn Battuta who stopped there in 1331 A.D added their voice to the record and a number of Portuguese writings from the early sixteenth century provide an important picture of Swahili history and society. All these point out to early trading and settlements of the people from Arabia and Persian Gulf in the East African Coast. On the first recorded Arab arrivals to the coast, A.H.J Prins has written: The first arrivals on the African scene are said to have been two princes, co-regents of Oman, belonging to the Julanda dynasty, who opposed themselves to the invasion of Arab troops under Hajjaj, the governor of Iraq, on behalf of the unmayyad Khalifs in Damascus. They were compelled to flee from their native country and left for East Africa, together with their followers, in A.H. 77 (A.D 696). This is the story of Suleiman and Said, victims of All _ Arab conquest of all
Writing in the 1890s Justus Strandes observed: Shirazi Sheikhs are described as the earliest rulers and according to the History of Kilwa found by the Portuguese, Muhammad the son of Ali bin Hasan, the founder of Kilwa, is considered to be the first of the line. These written accounts are confirmed by the verbal traditions of the native inhabitants. Many buildings now lying in ruins are characteristic of Shirazi buildings. Even today the inhabitants of whole villages like to boast of Shirazi descent. The fact that it is generally the chiefs or the village notables, members of the ruling families of the past, who usually describe themselves as being descendants of the old Persian emigrants, confirms the credibility of the claim. As is natural, the centuries which have passed, and the continued intermarriages with the native Africans have done much to efface the characteristics of the original stock. The products of many centuries of intermarriages are not, however, pure Bantu and it is indeed remarkable how frequently the Aryan physiognomy and bearing distinguishes these people from the Africans amongst whom they live. The traditions of Mombasa recall the original ruler as Mwanga Mkisi, another woman and the Shirazi as Shehe Mvita. In Vumba the Shirazi are remembered as establishing Vumba Kuu and the eight Shirazi towns to the North, while on Tumbatu Island off Zanzibar, the first Shirazi married a local woman to give rise to the Timbatu people. Similar Shirazi traditions can be found elsewhere along the Mrima coast of northern Tanzania and on Pemba, mafia, and the Comoro Islands. All portray similar patterns of immigration, interaction and integration, with the Shirazi or their offspring emerging as dominant. Although the themes that run through these traditions are similar, it is not all clear what they mean. Was the coast really conquered or settled by people from Shirazi? What is the significance of the common patterns of gift giving, marriages and creation of new ruling dynasties that are portrayed? During the eighth through the eleventh centuries, Shirazi largely dominated trade to the coast through the port of Siraf on the Persian Gulf but most of the sailors were Arabs. By the eleventh century the centre of the Indian Ocean trade was changing to southern Arabia and the Red Sea. The paucity of Persian loan words in Swahili and general lack of Persian inscriptions on mosques and tombs along the coast cast serious doubts as to whether most of the East African immigrants came from Persia. A few of the traditions trace the immigrant influence to Arabs from Oman, Muscat or Syria but evidence of Arab influence along the coast before 1100 A.D is also little since the coastal people had not yet converted to Islam. In conformity with the African and Arab social practice of maintaining genealogies as proof of one's social status, people under the influence of Shirazi or Arab peoples who had assimilated to local communities seem to have changed their genealogy to reflect their new or desired social identity. Derek Nurse and Thomas Spear on this have written:
The Swahili settlement is called in Swahili mji, plural miji, miji-kenda, like Makayachenda, basically means `Nine Settlements', have `Nine tribes,' and the Swahili mji or its Northern dialect equivalent mui can sometimes also be translated `tribe' or `clan'. All we need to note here is that they, too, had fingo charms buried beneath their gateways: they too had regalia items including either a drum (ngoma) or a side blown horn (siwa, but also in some contexts, baragumu, mbiu, jumbe or zumbe), and a broad bladed spear (fumo); that they too from an early date had graves both inside and outside the settlement, including those of important and unimportant people in both places; and that they too were regarded as sacred, as basically pre-Islamic rituals such as the Zinguo demonstrate. It is important to understand that as a result of the population movements during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the Swahili expanded by assimilating other peoples giving them the Swahili identity. The lowland pastoralists were gradually absorbed, with Katwa and Garre becoming the Bajuni and most Segeju were absorbed into communities in other Swahili settlements. However, when the Shungwaya successor states which had sprang up north of Mombasa eventually collapsed and most trade-routes to the interior disappeared, all traces of kinship between the Swahili and inland peoples were lost. Today the Swahili area consists of a coastal belt and a number of islands extending from the mouth of the Juba River in the north to Lurio River beyond Cape Delgado in the south. The 1,800 kilometres stretch extends to a depth of between five and ten kilometers inland from the shore line except for two areas at the Kenya-Tanzania border south of Mombasa inhabited by the Digo and Segeju respectively. The Swahili are divided into three main groupings on a combination of cultural and geographical considerations as follows: 1. The Northern (and Middle) Swahili include those Swahili living north of the Tana River Lamu Island, Bajuni and the splinter group of Amarani in the Benadir. Closely associated to this grouping are the Swahili living south of the Sabaki River who include those of Malindi, Mombasa and Vumba. 2. The Southern Swahili are the watu-wa-mrima of the Tanzania coast including Tanga and watuwa-Rufiji. Next to them are the mgao Swahili and those living north of Mozambique and the island of Kerimba. 3. The third group consists of the Island Swahili of Pemba and surrounding islands, Zanzibar and Tumbatu as well as the Mafia archipelago. Others are the Swahili of the Congo, Islamised and often detribalised Swahili-speaking interior communities such as in Dodoma or Tabora and Comoro archipelago.
ABAJUNI The history of the Abajuni people is similar to that of the Waswahili to the extent of being almost the same in origin and composition. Briefly, Abajuni are a coalition of Cushitic-speaking pastoralists with Bantu-speakers. Both groups history extends to the Juba history of Africans, Shirazi and Arabs who have intermixed to form Abajuni community or tribe. According to Mijikenda history, they lived in Shungwaya close to people they call Kilio who are also known as Segeju or Katwa. The Segeju/Katwa people were the first to leave Shungwaya travelling towards the south and were followed by the Digo before other Mijikenda also migrated to the south. Traditions collected in 1920 are that some of the Abajuni were in origin Garre (Gerra, Gurreh, Gare etc). An unpublished Garre tradition collected at Mandera in 1930 by a British colonial administrator J.W.K. Pease touches on the Garre-Katwa link.1 In what is now northern Kenya, Garre were defeated by the Borana and they fled eastwards to Rahanweyn country near the lower Shebelle. Two sections are said to have been left behind; the Gabbra and Rendille. Both the Gabbra and Rendille are acknowledged to have a Garre component. On this James De Vere Allen has written: The ancestral Garre fled at first as far as Afmadu (on Lac Dera near where it joins the Lower Juba an established junction for various long distance routes). There they spent some time and dug the famous wells. Then they split, the majority crossing the Juba and moving on to Audegle and other places. But a small party from the Kilia, Bana and Birkaya [sections] . . . turned aside at the Juba to make for the Coast between Kisimayu and Lamu where they settled with the Bajuni. Here we have an unmistakable reference to the Katwa or `Eight of the Bana', although it may be significant that the Kilia (the Aweer Kilii and the Wakilio or a-kilio of Bajuni, Swahili, Digo and Segeju traditions) are mentioned separately from the rest. Bana, Birkaya and Kilia sections still exist among the Garre. According to A.C. Hollis, (Hollis, AC, `The Wasegeju', typescript, Rhoes House Library, Exford, M.S. Afri. 1272 (B)-)2 the Kilio clan first arrived `in Shungwaya', to which it had been led by its leader, Avruna. In Shungwaya they encountered sixteen other clans of their own tribe who had arrived at an earlier date. In time, Avruna became hakim or `arbitrator'. At first all went well but in time Avruna began to make sexual claims upon his female subjects. His two brothers deserted him, each leading a separate group of Kilio out of Shungwaya. James De Vere Allen has written: One settled with his descendants in Barawa while the other took his followers to Chovai, a small island settlement (now Swahili-speaking) near the Bur Gau inlet. The leaders of the Autila clan rebelled against Avruna and slew him, forcing the remaining members of his clan into exile. (The Autila are still the senior clan among the Bajuni Katwa). Leadership of the Kilio refugees passed to a younger brother of Avruna, Bole, who took them first to Mwathi and Emethi (now known as Mea and Emezi on the mainland opposite Lamu) and
The Mazrui, a clan of Omani Arabs in the service of the Yarubi Imams, established themselves as hereditary rulers of Mombasa soon after the brief Portuguese reoccupation and presided over yet another revival of this famous old city state. Under Mazrui rule Mombasa power reached its zenith, outstripping that of the Shirazi and Malindi dynasty. For many years, Pemba and the mainland from Tanga past Malindi owed allegiance to Mombasa. Even Pate passed briefly under Mombasa influence, first as an ally and later as a virtual protectorate. The political history of the coast from 1750 to 1840 can in fact be read mainly as a struggle between two Omani dynasties, the Mombasa based Mazrui and the Muscat-based busaidi, with all but the very best last victories going to the Mazrui. The Mazrui during their rule entered into an alliance with an amalgam composed of two hostile groups of Swahili tribes which acknowledged members of an Omani family as heads of state because of the impossibility of coming to an agreement among themselves. This served Mombasa well enough to dominate most of the northern coast for several decades after 1750. In the meantime, Britain signed the first consular agreement with the Sultan of Zanzibar in 1839. Thereafter, with a British naval freet ordered to proceed to Zanzibar as a signal for a British blockade of the Island, on 5th June 1873, Sultan Barghash signed the treaty forbadding the maritime export of slaves from the coast of the mainland to other parts of the Sultan's dominions or to foreign countries. The treaty ordered the closure of all slave markets in the Sultans' dominions and forbade British Indians from possessing or acquiring fresh slaves. On 24th May, 1887, Sultan Barghash accepted Mackinnon application for a concession on behalf of his company, the British East Africa Association (BEAA) to administer, in the Sultan's name and develop the coast between Vanga and Kipini. This is what later became the ten mile strip of Kenya Colony and Protectorate after the British government took over from the British East Africa Company in 1895. The ten mile strip remained Zanzibars' territory under British protection until after Britain paid off the Sultan of Zanzibar and an agreement of territorial surrender to Kenya was signed by the Prime Minister of Zanzibar Mr. Shamte and the Prime Minister of Kenya Mzee Jomo Kenyatta in 1962 just before Kenyas independence in 1963. Entrenchment of the Islamic or Khadhi Courts in the Kenya Constitution was part of the settlement reached, without which Kenya would have become independent without the ten miles strip territory. The British government paid an anual of sterling pounds ten thousands to the Sultan as rent for the ten mile strip of land. The Sultan maintained a permanent representative at Mombasa with the tittle of Liwali of the Coast until at independence. The last Liwali was Sir Barrak Hiwawy and his deputy was Salim M. Muhashamy. Emigration from south-eastern and southern Arabia in the meantime took place in the early eighteenth century and by the end of the century, a process of re-Arabisation seems to have began on the coast, in which Arab kinship, values, and elements of material culture gained prestige at the expense of Swahili culture. Swahili society in the long run was considerably modified by this process, which took roots after the Omani authority was reasserted in the 1820s and 1830s. The Omani Arab period thus ranks with the era of Shirazi colonisation as one in which
In addition to the Railway builders, many more Indians came on their own, the majority being shop-keepers, barbers, tailors, etc to serve the Railway workers' hordes while others trekked into the bush together with the first British administrators. These adventurous traders supplied not only the few Europeans, but also the increasingly import consuming Africans who began congregating around the government administrative outposts. In 1902, a (Kenya) government notice inviting Indian farmers to come and take land in the protectorate was published in India and a number of farmers, particularly Patels came. When the Railway was completed, the great majority of Railway employees returned to India but about 6,000 elected to stay on. Some continued as employees of the Railway, others joined government administration and others became business people, professionals and independent artisans. By 1905 there were about 7,000 Indians in the protectorate who it has been estimated accounted for 80% of its capital investment and business activities. To appreciate the pioneers' times and patterns of their arrival and settlement, individual persons have been picked as case studies. The stories of their movements and encounters have been narrated so as to enable the reader to form a clearer picture of how these people became part of the history of this country and the very important part they played to open up the country for modern economic, cultural, social and political development. Obviously, these are not the only individual Indian/Asian people who came and settled in the country during the time in reference, they are only a representative sample. Lieutenant Emery From "The Diaries of Lieutenant Emery" in The British in Mombasa 1824-1826 by Sir John Grey (Passim) and quoted by Cynthia Salvadori in the book We came in Dhows, we find that Asians (Indians) had been working in Mombasa for such a long time that the British Government had appointed Indian officers in its service to senior positions as early as before 1825. Salvadori has quoted Lieutenant Emery thus: (March 19, 1825 ) "This forenoon I gave the appointment of collector of Customs (vacant by the death of Mr. George Phillips) to Ladhu, the Banyan, for his services in that department since the English took the place, which office he has filled with the strictest attention. According to form, I invited him to the customs house accompanied by several of the chief Banyan and (Muslim) Indians and (on) our arrival there the guard belonging to the establishment fired three volleys. I then read his appointment and according to form presented him with a shawl and a turban purchased by the establishment. On our leaving three volleys were again fired. We returned to the house accompanied by all the Banyans and Indians of the place. I then read the instructions to Ladhu and he took his oath according to his religion.
Manackjee Aspiandiarjee Nanabhai One of the other earliest Indians in East Africa, but whose name is not remembered, was in Zanzibar in 1842 when Queen Victoria sent a dismantled state coach as a present to the Sultan. He is the one who put it together. However, the name of another one of the earliest Indians is
The Hindus are glad I have come for many things, but they bitterly complain of my having stopped swindling. In their opinion, I have done them a cruel wrong . . . Lamu, July 30th 1884 I was successful in obtaining a new interpreter . . . a first rate man, speaking and writing sufficiently well Arabic, Swahili, Hindustani and English. By race he is a barstard between a Hindu and a Swahili . . . Lamu, Sept. 3rd 1884 The smallpox is raging terribly . . . only yesterday a Hindu came to complain to me of two dead bodies burned in front of his doorstep . . . Lamu, May 11th, 1885 Not long ago a British Indian here received a native newspaper from Bombay via Zanzibar . . . (95) Gurdit Singh Gurdit Singh came to Kenya at the age of 32 years as a cashier employee of the Bank of India, reaching Mombasa from India after forty five days by dhow. As a cashier with the Bank, he travelled to remote areas of the country, living in tents and keeping his money bags under the bed. When later on he reached Nairobi, he saw good business prospects and he left the Bank to return to Lahore to recruit artisans such as carpenters, masons and blacksmiths. He returned to Nairobi with about fifty people and capital for the business. Among the people he brought were Labh Singh Sagoo, Bulaka Singh, Bhawal Mal, Bhawani Shankar and Nauhria Ram Maini who later became important personalities in the Indian community. From an interview with Trilok Singh Nayer of Nairobi by C. Salvadori we find the following account: My father established his own furniture business in Nairobi and did very well. He made good quality furniture and was the first person in Kenya to import teakwood from Burma. He did so well that by 1913 he had enough money to build one of the most prestigious buildings in Nairobi, the Nayer building, now known as Kipande House and occupied by the Kenya Commercial Bank and considered as one of the "historic" buildings in Kenya. and of course he owned other notable properties in town.20 After he got settled in Kenya, Gurdit Singh brought his wife Danyanti to Kenya and all his eleven children were born in Kenya. Trilok Singh Nayer who was the sixth child was born in 1919 and has continued to say the following about his father: He was also a prominent person amongst the Indian community at large. People like Allidina Visram, Suleman Virjee, they were my father's friends I saw them in our house. At one point he was chosen by the Indian National Congress here to represent the Indian communities to the Governor of those days. And then he had a disaster in his business. He lost all his wealth. How
At that time Europeans were settling in Kenya, many of them Dutch people who stopped by the side of Lake Nakuru on their way to Eldoret. He opened a small shop there in a small tent. At night, the lions would kill their transport animals and within their hearing from the tents, they would drink water out of their drums. As transportation using donkeys and ox-carts was a very fast growing business, he started his own transport caravan going from Nakuru to Eldoret, Kisumu, Lake Baringo and other places. When together with his African employees he ran out of food on the way, they would barter things like umbrellas and beads for goats which they would eat. Sometimes they were caught in between tribal fighting and would be ordered by European administrators to stay where they were for days or months, until the situation was brought under control. Eventually he stopped relying on Nairobi merchants and went for goods from Mombasa by his own ox-carts which took between six and eight months to bring goods to Nakuru. In an interview, published in We Came in Dhows, the grandson of Seth Ibrahim Karimbux, Tehsin Karimbux who is also a member of the fourth generation of the family living in Nakuru, Tehsin Karimbux quoted his grandfather as having said: It was my business to travel on foot from place to place and I learned this land of Kenya inch by inch, by day and by night. The local inhabitants would run miles away when they saw strange people, white and brown. They were much frightened by us. Life became so interesting that now I could see the light and hope for the future in this land. The small settlement called Nakuru was growing. The land around Lake Nakuru was being allocated freely to the new settlers. The railway line was coming up behind us and bringing in more settlers. In 1900 the railway reached Nakuru on its way to Kisumu. Business picked up so fast that it was impossible to even close my eyes and rest for five minutes. I was a happy young man with a comfortable amount of money. Osman Allu He arrived in Kenya between 1894 and 1896 aged about 17 years and died here in 1973 aged 96 years. He told his history to his grandson Yakub Allu who was born here in 1938. Osman Allu worked for Allidina Visram as a salesman and bookkeeper before he started his own business. He always said that Allidina Visram was a great merchant and an enterprising man, the kind who would take risks. He gained a lot of knowledge about business by working for him. Osman Allu went into partnership with a man called Mohamedally Ratansi and they walked up to Nyeri where the European settlers were starting a station; there, they started the first shop in 1901 or 1902. Nyeri then had only that shop and the government station. Thereafter they put up a shop in M[rang'a (Fort Hall) and a sawmill in Karatina from where they supplied the sleepers for the track when the railway line was being laid to Nanyuki. Osman Allu and his wife Jomabai had three sons and five daughters, all born in Nyeri. He helped to build a proper Indian school in Nyeri in the late 1920s and he was a big contributor to the building of the present Nyeri Mosque at about the same time. He contributed to the building of the Catholic Consolata Mission Hospital at Nyeri, and to the Tumutumu Hospital, which was run by the Church of Scotland. His grandson Yakub Allu of Nanyuki in an interview has recounted:
Dharamshi Kala's grandson Rasik Kantaria is a prominent businessman in Nairobi and the owner of Prime Bank. The other grandson, Rajni Kantaria, besides being a prominent businessman takes a lot of interest in social work for the Asian community. In addition to being chairman of Lohana community, he has also served as chairman of the Hindu Council of Kenya. Dr. Mary De Souza She was born in May 1890 in India, a granddaughter of a Bomby doctor. She studied medicine at the Grant Medical College, Bombay where she met a young man who later became her husband. They both graduated in the same year, 1914. While Dr. A.C.L. de Souza left for Kenya to work for the Government, Mary took employment in India. Dr. A.C.L. de Souza returned on leave to India and the two doctors married in Bombay in 1919 and came to Kenya. Dr. Mary de Souza was the first lady doctor to come to East Africa, and possibly to the continent from India. She worked at the maternity hospital at Ngara and she became the darling of the Indian women in Nairobi and outside Nairobi. From up-country, it took three or four days to come to Nairobi to see Mary which many women did. Synthia Salvadori on her has written: Dr. Mary was a great friend and colleague of Mr. Manilal Ambalal Desai who came to Kenya in 1916 as a law clerk in a European firm and left the firm to fight for the political rights of the Asian community. Desai was born in India in the year 1879 and died on 15th July, 1926 in Bukoba, Tanganyika. This great Indian who had sacrificed his life and time for his fellow down trodden Indians for a long time unfortunately died a dismal and pathetic death. He died in an uninhabited hut, with no one near him to give him even a drop of water or to note his last words. Mary wept bitterly when she heard of his death. Dr. Mary at once thought of a memorial to him which her husband and many others helped erect in Nairobi, the Desai Memorial Hall. The foundation stone was laid by Shrimati Sarojini Naidu on 5th December 1929 when she was invited to Kenya to preside over the 9th session of the E.A. Indian National Congress. The opening ceremony was performed by Seth Nanji Kalidas Mehta of Uganda on 23rd May, 1934. Every year on the anniversary of Desai's death, Dr. Mary organised a flag Day, until ill-health isolated her from social services to which she had dedicated her life. Desai called her the ambassador of India, and so she was! Highly educated and used to the western way of life, she nevertheless preserved until the last the Indian traditions of her family. She was a happy blend of both. Manilal Ambalal Desai M.A. Desai came to Kenya in 1915. A bold and selfless person, Desai founded the East African Indian Congress and brought all Asian associations under one banner. He began the battle for basic rights for Africans and Asians. He remained in touch with Harry Thuku and also a number of Asian leaders of the time. He launched the East African Chronicle to propagate his ideas and to create a forum for people to demand their rights and fight against injustice. He put more emphasis on Africans rights than those for Asians and Europeans. Desai's fiery writings in the East African Chronicle, published in English, did not go well with the colonial authorities. He was jailed in 1924 for six months.
Desai was released from prison in early 1925 and immediately the government appointed him to the Legislative Council. While in Legco, Desai initiated several resolutions against colour bar but all were defeated as his resolutions could not muster majority support in a predominatly white Legislative Council. In 1926 Desai travelled with his friend Sita Ram to Bukoba in Tanganyika (now Tanzania). He died in Bukoba on 11 July the same year. The news of his death was received with horror and sorrow by the Kenyan population both Asians and Africans. The Asian community decided to create a memorial for Desai and a fund raising was initiated for this purpose and soon the Desai Memorial Hall and library were established. On 31 May 1930, the world renowned poetess and Indian national leader Sarojini Naidu officially layed the foundation stone of the Desai Memorial Library. Desai Memorial Hall and library building has now been demolished and shops and office building erected on the plot as private property in the land grabbing orgy of the recent past. Premchand Popat Shah Premchand was the eldest son of Popat Hira Chandaria. The Chandarias lived as an extended family and engaged in farming. The family split and Premchand at a young age had to work in a farm to look after his parents, brothers and sister. Premchand was too young to handle the work in the farm and wanted to go overseas and earn sufficient money, return to India and set up a shop so that he could look after his family. His parents allowed him to travel to Kenya in 1916. He arrived at Mombasa where he was employed as a shop attendant and worked from morning to midnight for a salary of 20 rupees. He felt at that rate he would never be able to make sufficient money to return to India and set up a shop. He borrowed some money from his friends, got some from his parents and started (in partnership with Khimasia Family) a shop in Ngara area of Nairobi under the name of Premchand Popat & Company. By 1928, their business was rated among the big Asian businesses during that time with business like Alibhai & Co., Ahmed Bros. and Karman Mepa. The specialty of the business was to cater for provisions for the European community which were mainly imported. During 1928, the partnership with Khimasia split and the family set up Premchand Bros. Between 1916 and 1928, Premchand invited his family, his two younger brothers Maganlal and Chaganlal, and later on he invited a number of his cousins and relatives to Kenya. Initially all of them worked with him. Later on, he arranged businesses for them while keeping his own family together in business. In her book Mercantile Adventures: The World of East African Asians, Dana April Seidenberg has written thus: In 1928 the group split up and the Chandarias became Premchand. Brothers; all Premchards were called to East Africa brothers, cousins and uncles of the Chandaria family. In the same year Premchand Raichand set up an aluminum manufacturing plant in Mombasa and a milling factory in Thika and in 1930 he set up the Kenya Tanning Extract Company, also in Thika, where leather was tanned for export. Between 1941 and 1949 the family ventured into a number of areas of industry setting up all manner of food processing plants from peanuts to salt manufacture. The Chandarias also entered into the manufacture of paints and textiles on a very large scale. In 1949, moreover, they took control of Kenya Aluminum, making pots, pans, kettles and sufurias [cooking iron pots]. They added roofing sheets, hurricane lanterns, stoves, nails and barbed wire. Later, with the Khimasias, they set up the East African Match Company, providing most of the
This is to certify that Messrs A.M. Jevanjee & Co. of Karachi provisioned our Indian Military Forces here per contract for one year, at the end of which time their agent left for Karachi. The rations were delivered promptly and found to be satisfactory . . . The Indian railway coolie labour which you supplied, have given every satisfaction and the rations for Indian and native workmen have always been of uniform quality and punctually and regularly supplied. . . . Messrs Jevanjee & Co. have discharged a cargo of general goods for the Uganda Railway containing a large number of heavy lifts from two to ten tons weight, and all work without the least accidents and very satisfactory indeed. The construction of the Railway started in 1896 after the first batch of 350 workers arrived from India on 24 January 1896. The work force included surveyors, draughtsmen, masons, carpenters, blacksmiths and clerks. Following Jevanjee's earlier success in recruitment of Indian labour, he together with one Hussein Bux, was the major contractor for labour recruitment. By 1900 the Uganda Railway construction authorities had brought in about 25,000 men from India and procuring their rations and other supplies from Karachi became a problem. The contract was finally awarded to Jevanjee who was able to supply the rations and boots for 25,000 men in the required manner and at 20 per cent less cost than the Railway's own agents in Karachi by taking advantage of the economics of scale. Jevanjee made a fortune from railway construction and afterwards built many of the stone buildings in Nairobi. At the time, there were three major firms in Mombasa, those of Allidina Visram, Shariff, Jaffer & Co. and A.M. Jevanjee. The first Nairobi District Commissioner John Ainsworth's house was built by Jevanjee on the hill where the university lecture hall at the Nairobi National Museum is. His offices were later built
Maize milling in Thika 1923; Kenya Aluminium Works in 1928 (now know as Kaluworks and owned by the Comcraft Group of Companies); Premchand Raichand & Co trading and later a holding company in partnership with M P Shah and others; this used to be the flagship of the Group; Wattle bark harvesting first in Thika in 1929 and then in Maragua in 1931; Kenya Tanning Extract Co in Thika in 1933; Purchase of Limuru Tanning Co in 1935; Founded cotton ginneries and maize milling plants in M]]r[ in 1935/37; Purchase of Muhoroni Sugar Mills in 1941. He left for India in 1941 for a holiday during the Second World War and, being an entrepreneur, found plenty of scope there and became a big operator in precious metals and commodities markets. He also became established in textiles, oil milling and refining, shipping, etc. He retired from active business in 1955 and lived in Jamnagar where he died in 1961. He was very much a family man and his descendants are spread throughout many countries in the world. Their main activities are in Kenya and include Mabati Rolling Mills Ltd, Insteel Ltd,
Of all the tribes in Kenya, the Kikuyu were the most affected by the arrival of the Europeans. The Kikuyu farmed the cool central highlands that extended from the outskirts of Nairobi north and west to the aberdare mountains, and east to the slopes of Mount Kenya. It was and is rich agricultural land, and its gentle, misty climate reminded many of the British settlers of home. Much of the region seemed to be unfarmed bush "good land lying uncultivated," as one settler phrased it and in 1904 a government surveyor simply drew a line through it, dividing the inhabited from the supposedly uninhabited land. Four thousand square miles were opened up to white settlers in this first survey. Those Kikuyu who lost their property had to find new homes, either as "squatters" on European farms or in one of the three Kikuyu reserves. By the time Louis and Mary returned to Kenya in February 1937, a total of twelve thousand square miles of Kikuyu land had been appropriated by the British and sold to white settlers. Canon Leakey who was friendly and sympathetic to his G]k[y[ neighbours helped as much as he could and on this Virginia Morell has written: The Kikuyu Association was founded under the guidance of Canon Leakey, Louis' father, after he assisted one of his mission families in a land dispute with the Government. The family of Stephen Kinuthia had lost most of their land in 1908; subsequently, in 1919, the government marked off their remaining sixty seven acres. Kinuthia then "asked Canon Leakey to write a letter from us (the Kinuthia clan) to the government saying that 240 acres of our land had been taken in 1908 and now the government was taking some more and we had nowhere to go. The letter was written . . . and it was sent to the government. They listened and the land was not taken and we all thought the power of this letter a most wonderful thing". based on this success, Canon Leakey suggested that the chiefs band together to protest other land appropriations. In 1920 the Kikuyu association was born with Chief Koinange serving as Chairman.7 Their son, Louise Seymour Bazett Leakey was born at the Kabete Mission on August 7, 1903. His father, after suffering from insomnia, dizzy spells, and tinnitus (a severe ringing in the ears) and troubled about their wretched living quarters, took the family home to Reading, England one year short of their full four year missionary term. As Harry intended to return to Kabete and in order to keep his G]k[y[ alive and to continue his work of translating the Bible, he took with him Stefano K]n[thia, one of the G]k[y[ boys he had baptized. Just before Christmas, 1906, the Leakey family returned to Kenya. The Leakeys were great friends of Chief Koinange, and he warmly welcomed Louis and Mary to his home in 1937. He provided them with a guest hut behind his house. He then called a meeting of nearly one hundred elders from the K]ambuu reserve. They gathered in the shade of a sacred fig tree (M[gumo) and Louis presented his case. There were further discussions among the elders and after a week, the elders granted his request. They also appointed a panel of nine of their senior members to act as his advisers. A three volume book The Southern Kikuyu before 1903 was written and later published. of all the tribes in Kenya the G]k[y[ people had lost most land to the settlers. More than a million Ag]k[y[ were confined to three overcrowded reserves and another quarter million was either without land or living as squatters on European farms. Virginia Morell has written: For Louis the plight of the Kikuyu presented a dilemma. He had grown up among them, spoke their language, was an initiated first-grade elder, and considered them his people. "I am in so many ways a Kikuyu myself," he often said. Like his father, who had helped senior Chief
In November 1897, Delamere's caravan reached Ravine where they were received by James Martin, his Majesty's Collector (District Commissioner) of Baringo district of Uganda (Uganda protectorate boundary at that time was at Naivasha). James Martin was probably the only administrative officer who has ever been in charge of a large district who could not read or write. He was a Maltese sail-maker whose real name was Antonio Martin. Elspeth Huxley has written thus on this D.C.: When the British Government took over the company's territory as a Protectorate two years before Delamere's arrival at Ravine, James Martin like many of the company's employees, including such well-known provincial commissioners as Ainsworth, Hobley and Bagge became a civil servant, rising to the rank of collector. F.J. (later Sir Frederick) Jackson, taught him to sign his name but that was the limit of his literary skill. All his letters were written for him by da Silva, a Goanese cousin. He used to disguise his inability to read by pretending to have bad sight, though it was as keen, in reality, as his native wit. Delamere trekked across Laikipia early in 1898 to the Uaso Nyiro. From the river, he went up to Marsabit by way of Laisamis. He camped by Marsabit crater lake which the local Samburu people he made friendship with named the Delamere Njoro. (Njoro is the Samburu/Maasai word for water). He continued south to M]]r[ on the northern slopes of Mount Kenya. Delamere camped below the borders of their cultivation and sent Somalis (in his caravan) to buy food. The M]]r[ refused to speak to the messagers and summoned their warriors. Delamere went unarmed with only two of his men to the elders' village and he eventually persuaded them to come out and talk and discussions continued for three days. In the meantime, the Somalis were growing more and more impatient and longing for a fight. Delamere alternatively argued with the Somalis, who urged him to attack the M]]r[, and with the M]]r[, who refused to sell food to him. In the end the M]]r[ brought him food and allowed him to pass through their country. Even then, troubles were not over. The Somalis refused to eat the local food. They would touch nothing but rice and durrha. They became surly and rebellious when they were told to make the best of bananas. Again, Delamere had to bring his persuasive powers into action. From M]]r[ he passed through the G]k[y[ land. When Teleki had passed through G]k[y[ country ten years before, they had been reluctant to trade and had been regarded as considerably more hostile and dangerous than the Maasai. Von Hohnel talked about "the shunned and dreaded Kikuyu country." The last stage of the long journey took the caravan through Machakos and they met the advancing railway at Tsavo, then the railhead. At Mombasa he embarked on a ship for England via Aden where he paid off the Somali helpers. He arrived back in England in 1898 with a thick black beard, and his mother, who had not heard from him at all for two years, failed to recognise him on the station platform. In July 1899 he married lady Florence Cole, a daughter of the Earl of Enniskillen. He then made arrangements to collect birds for the British Museum from East Africa and took with him his wife and a qualified taxidermist and collector. On arrival at Mombasa in October, he employed sixty Swahili porters and went up country by train. It took Delamere and his party three days to journey from Mombasa to Athi River. They remained at Athi River for one month due to the smallpox outbreak which raged in 1899 and attacked the Swahili porters. They then moved up the Athi River collecting birds and spent a week in Nairobi before moving to the railhead at the escarpment from where they sent to Britain 386 birds of 178 varieties. They then moved to Kedong and Kinangop and were in Naivasha for Christmas. From Naivasha Delamere and his wife marched to Nakuru and thence along the Molo River to Baringo. With the first experience of
Delamere's Personality One day Lord Delamere was travelling up country from Mombasa on the same train as a senior and important official. He woke up in the morning to find the train shunted on to a siding and deserted in the middle of the veld. He was told the senior official wanted to shoot a lion and together with the Indian driver had gone some distance away to look for one. Delamere lost his temper. He walked up and down the siding cursing all officials and their ways. As the morning dragged on and the heat became unbearable in the stuffy coach, he became more and more enraged at the arrogance of the official. In anger he asked whether any of the natives knew how to drive a locomotive. One of the firemen said that he had never actually done so, but had often watched from the foot plate and knew all about it. Elspeth Huxley has written: "All right," Delamere said, "get up and drive the train to Nairobi." The native was doubtful about the propriety of this. But it was the very early days, when anything a white man said was looked upon as an order, regardless of who he was. The fireman eventually agreed and climbed on to the foot plate. Others were enlisted as stokes. The engine got up steam, backed on to the main line and pulled out for Nairobi. It arrived in safely, leaving the senior official stranded down the line until he was rescued by a special train on the following day. In accordance with the thinking of his times, Delamere's views on the native question were far liberal. He believed in "absolute justice" in punishment of Europeans for offences against natives and treatment of the native population in a "just and liberal manner", but by 1905, what was known as native rights had been but little recognised. Delamere's opinions were even heretical. In his views on the native question he was in advance of his time. An extract from a letter he wrote to the president of the colonist association Mr. Frank Watkins reads: Of course no two people agree as to the best method of settling the native question. I have always strongly held the belief that a strong hand on the Government's part combined with absolute justice for the native is the best method. When I say justice I mean in a case between black and black or between white and black. I cannot myself subscribe to the belief that it is bad for a white man to be punished if he breaks the law in this country any more than at home, nor do I believe that it is bad for the native. I quite agree the Indian penal code was made for a conquered race and is unfitted for white men, but a country to do any good must help its Government to uphold the laws. No country can afford to uphold tampering with justice. Lord Delamere and Sir Charles Eliot held that the inherent sense of justice of "our own people" meaning the tradition of justice among men and women of the British race was the greatest, and ultimately the only safeguard for the native peoples. After Eliot's resignation the policy of creating a Maasai reserve was accepted by Lord Lonsdowne and Eliot's policy of interspersion abandoned for ever. Elspeth Huxley has written: The Maasai question was one important issue on which Delamere disagreed with the commissioner. As a rule he opposed the rigid segregation of natives and Europeans. He believed that close contact between the two races was ultimately the only way to civilise the African. He used to refer to the relegation of natives to reserves as the "zoological gardens policy". It was not good, he held, trying to shelter them from the force of progress and change that were sweeping