Professional Documents
Culture Documents
...........................................................................................
Abstract........
...
...
.1
.2
.2
..5
.7
..15
27
..27
..31
..40
47
...47
...48
..53
...54
....57
.57
..67
.....75
.79
..79
.....81
...83
..87
.....87
.91
.95
....96
....103
...104
113
....114
116
...118
121
....124
VI
2-1
2-2
...20
4-1
.47
4-2
.51
4-3
....52
5-1 .58
5-2
.58
5-3
.58
5-4
....60
5-5 .61
5-6
.61
5-7
.61
5-8 .62
5-9
.62
5-10 .62
5-11 .63
5-12 .63
5-13 ..63
5-14 .64
5-15 64
5-16 .64
5-17 .65
5-18 .65
5-19 .65
5-20 .66
5-21 .66
5-22 .66
5-23 ...68
5-24 77
5-25 .78
VII
2-1
12
2-2
.14
4-1
.....48
5-1
....60
5-2
60
5-3
...67
VIII
14 20
40
II
Abstract
The thesis explores the phenomena and skills of extended writing and the
effects of its application in teaching writing. The effects will help students
in writing and teachers in teaching children writing.
In this research, the fifth graders are divided into two groups: the control
groupCG and the experimental groupEG. The students of EG are
taught to practice extended writing. In contrast, the teacher assigns a topic
to CG. Both CG and EG students are taught narration for eighteen class
sessions. In the end, the researcher selects twenty students from each class.
Forty students serve as the objects of the study. The researcher also collects
the needed data in different ways, such as questionnaire, the number of
words and so forth. Then, the data were analyzed by descriptive statistics
and ANCOVA to explore the performance and opinions of extended
writing.
Based on the data, the researcher found the following:
1After CG and EG students accepted writing training, there were no
III
88
2003
2005
2005
2003 95
- 1 -
1.
2.
1.
2.
40
- 2 -
1999
1993
19861997
40
- 3 -
- 4 -
2003
2003
2002
- 5 -
1999
1999
2000
2000
- 6 -
2002
- 7 -
2001
Anderson 1985
1
1998
2
- 8 -
2-1
2-1
Rohman 1965
1 2 3
Legum
1 2
Krashen 1972
Elbow 1973
Britton 1978
Applebee 1979
Draper 1979
3 4
1
2
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
4 5
Harris 1952
- 9 -
2001
2001
van Dijk
van Dijk
van Dijk
3 Agricola 1972
Brinker 1973
1971 Emig 1971
2001 2000
1980 Flower Hayes 1981
2001
1993van Dijk
- 10 -
2-1
1.
2.
3.
Flower Hayes
Anderson 1980
Gould 1980
1981 Nold 1981
1983 Humes
1983 1987 Bereiter
Scadamalia 1987
2000 1998
- 11 -
2-1
70
- 12 -
2001
80 Nystrand Himley 1984
The social-interaction model
reciprocity
elaboration segmentation
2-2
- 13 -
2-2
1999
2002
- 14 -
2000
- 15 -
18 37 41
51 57 64 82 92
64
82
5 90
95
1996
- 16 -
1993
2000
1.
2005
2001
1996
1 2 3
1999
- 17 -
1998
2004
2.
3.
- 18 -
2005
2000
2001
2001 6-7
12
- 19 -
2-2 8
2-2
7~8
1.
7~8
1.
1.
2.
2.
2.
3.
3.
3.
9~10
1.
1.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
5.
11~12
1.
1.
2.
12~13
2.
3.
3.
4.
5.
2-1 2001
2000 1999
- 20 -
1.
2001 1996
2003
1
2
3
- 21 -
400
1996
1975
1997
9
2.
1986
1999
- 22 -
2000 1998
1986 1999
2002
2001
2005 2005 2005
1.
2.
- 23 -
3.
4.
1986
5.
6.
2000
1999 1988
7.
- 24 -
1994 1982
8.
1995
9.
CSIW
1992
1996
10.
- 25 -
2002 2005
2005
11.
1996
2003
2002
Bandura
2003
Gardner
1999 2002
- 26 -
1999 2003
2003
1999
2003
- 27 -
2001
2003
1999
2000
2003
1997
2000
- 28 -
1997
2001 1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9 10
1988
- 29 -
1995
- 30 -
1999
1993
1999 1985
- 31 -
1.
1
2.
1
- 32 -
1.
1
- 33 -
2.
1
1.
1
- 34 -
2.
1
- 35 -
1.
1
2
C
2.
1
- 36 -
1999
1. 1
2.
1999
- 37 -
3. 2
1993 1999
1.
1996 1999
- 38 -
101
101 508 101 5 106
2.
12.9
3.
4.
http://168.motc.gov.tw/gip/mp
- 39 -
5.
18
86 92
3230 73
- 40 -
1.
2.
3.
- 41 -
1.
1.
300
2.
3.
600
- 42 -
2.
2
3
4 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
- 43 -
- 44 -
- 45 -
- 46 -
4-1
20
12
20
11
35
34 69
- 47 -
1 20
40
4-1
4-1
- 48 -
40 4-3
- 49 -
1.
2.
3.
- 50 -
2
4-2
4-2
2001
- 51 -
4-3
10
11
6
7
12
13
14
- 52 -
1988 1992
50
50
9
40
3
4
- 53 -
60 60 75 75
0.859
- 54 -
- 55 -
- 56 -
5-1
F .776 P .387 .05
- 57 -
5-1
5336.365
5336.365
250887.978
36
6969.111
F
.766
5-2
F .487
5-2
GRO
3369.703
3369.703
256224.343
37
6924.982
F
.487
5-3
5-3
324.90
75.41
292.20
75.46
292.10
58.20
295.80
98.85
5-4
- 58 -
5-4 62.5
25 2
92.5 80
5-23
5-23
45
25 20
92.5 5
2.5
1
2
- 59 -
5-4
10
10
20
10
25
7.5
10
25
25 62.5
37 92.5
32
80
18
45
37
92.5
2.5
2.5
10
2.5
2.5
52.5
30 17.5
5-1
5-2 3
60
90
52.5
77.55
80
50
66.13
70
40
60
30
63.03
66.12
51.75
50
30
40
17.5
20
30
20
10
10
0
5-1
5-2
5-2
- 60 -
5-5 F
3.201P .082 .05
5-5
2.346
2.346
26.389
36
.733
3.201
5-6
F .171
5-6
GRO
.133
.133
28.736
37
.777
.171
5-7
5-7
7.40
1.33
7.49
.98
7.70
8.11
1.10
7.80
1.29
7.58
- 61 -
5-8 F
.002 P .961 .05
5-8
5.813
5.813
85.950
36
2.388
.002
5-9
F .048
5-9
GRO
0.112
.112
85.956
37
2.323
.048
5-10
5-10
10.27
1.95
9.96
1.58
9.84
9.57
1.55
9.83
1.66
9.95
- 62 -
5-11 F
1.038P .315 .05
5-11
1.346
1.346
46.653
36
1.296
1.038
5-13 F .354
5-12
GRO
0.460
0.460
47.999
37
1.297
.354
5-13
5-13
5.32
1.18
5.43
1.53
5.33
5.03
.98
5.45
1.17
5.55
- 63 -
5-14 F
.766 P .387 .05
5-14
1.497
1.497
70.335
36
1.954
.766
5-15 F .103
5-15
GRO
.200
0.200
71.832
37
1.941
.103
5-16
5-16
9.65
1.33
9.59
1.78
9.50
9.26
1.70
9.55
1.28
9.64
- 64 -
5-17 F
.909 P .347 .05
5-17
25.153
25.153
995.973
36
27.666
F
.909
5-18 F .211
5-18
GRO
5.815
5.815
1021.127
37
27.598
F
.211
5-19
5-19
34.56
4.68
35.81
7.05
34.71
31.56
5.60
32.81
5.73
33.91
- 65 -
5-20 F
.853 P .362 .05
5-20
58.218
58.218
2457.093
36
68.253
F
.853
5-21 F .010
5-21
GRO
.649
0.649
2515.312
37
67.981
F
.010
5-22 66.99
66.73
5-22
67.20
8.95
68.28
11.67
66.99
63.54
9.13
65.44
8.81
66.73
- 66 -
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
5-3
5-3
40
4
5 5-23
- 67 -
5-23
1.
34
85
2.
26
65
3.
15
37.5
4.
12
30
5.
12
30
6.
20
7.
10
8.
10
9.
10.
2.5
19
- 68 -
19 4
16
34
- 69 -
16
34
31
32
31 32
31
- 70 -
24
1 24
16
- 71 -
9 16
21
14
- 72 -
21 14
38
- 73 -
3 38
37
37
15
- 74 -
18
15 18
18
10
10
40
5-24 5-25
- 75 -
5-24
87.5
50
67.5
57.5
77.5
50
7 37.5
35
27.5
5-25
- 76 -
5-24
35
87.5
12.5
35
87.5
12.5
34
85.0
15.0
4.
10
25.0
22.5
20
50.0
2.5
5.
12
30.0
20.0
20
50.0
6.
27
67.5
10
25.0
7.5
7.
15
37.5
11
27.5
14
35.0
8.
31
77.5
20.0
2.5
23
57.5
10
25.0
15.0
2.5
20
50.0
11
27.5
17.5
5.0
11.
26
65.0
12
30.0
5.0
12.
26
65.0
22.5
12.5
34
85.0
15.0
31
77.5
20.0
2.5
34
85.0
15.0
1.
2.
3.
9.
10.
13.
14.
15.
- 77 -
5-25
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
18
90.0
10.0
17
85.0
15.0
18
90.0
10.0
17
85.0
15.0
20
100
14
70.0
30.0
40.0
10.0
10.0
10
50.0
35.0
10
50.0
5.0
45.0
10.0
45.0
15.0
30.0
11
55.0
16
80
15.0
5.0
11
55.0
35.0
10.0
11
55.0
20.0
25.0
20.0
35.0
45.0
17
85.0
15.0
14
70.0
25.0
5.0
15
75.0
10.0
10.0
5.0
40.0
40.0
20.0
11
55.0
20.0
20.0
5.0
45.0
35.0
15.0
5.0
15
75.0
20.0
5.0
11
55.0
40.0
5.0
14
70.0
20.0
10.0
12
60.0
25.0
15.0
17
85.0
15.0
17
85.0
15.0
17
85.0
15.0
14
70.0
25.0
5.0
19
95.0
5.0
15
75.0
25.0
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
- 78 -
- 79 -
- 80 -
- 81 -
- 82 -
- 83 -
1.
2.
1.
2.
20
- 84 -
- 85 -
- 86 -
1993
2003
1999
1988
1999
1986
2005
2000
1998
1995
1999
2003
1996
1999
1997
2002
1985
1996
2003
1996
1975
2000
2002
- 87 -
1999
1997
2002
2000
2001
2003
2003
1994
1988
1982
2003
1999
1995
2000
2001
1996
1998
1997
1999
1993
1995
- 88 -
2000
2001
2003
2005
2004
1996
2002
2005
1998
2001
2005
1998
2005
2005
- 89 -
2005
2005
2002
1988
2915-24
2001 - 16
11 4 106-111
2004
910-11
2000
296
185-199
2001 - 9 185-192
1991
37 7.8 48-51
2002 6 147-164
1992
- 90 -
Agricola, Erhard.1972. Semantische Relationen im Text und im System. 2.,
bearbeitete Auflage. The Hague Paris.
Anderson, John R.1985. Cognitive psychology and its Implication. New York.
Anderson, V., Bereiter, C., Smart, D.1980. Activation of semantic networks in
writing Teaching students how to do it themselves. Paper presented at the annual
meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Applebee, A. N.1979. Trends in written composition. Paper presented at the Midwest
School Improvement Forum, Milwaukee.
Bereiter, C. Scardamalia, M.1987. The psychology of written composition.
Hillsdale, N. J. Erlbaum.
Brinker, Klaus.1973. Zum Textbegriff in der heutigen Linguistik. In Sitta, Horst
Brinker, KlausHrsg.. 1973. Studien zur Texttheorie und zur deutschen
Grammatik Festgabe fr Hans Glinz zum 60. Geburtstag. Dsseldorf, 9-41.
Britton, J.1978. The composing process and the functions of writing. In C. R. Cooper,
L. OdellEds., Research on composing Points of depature. Urbana, Ill.
National Council of Teachers of English.
Draper, V.1979. Formative writing Writing to assist learning in all subject area
- 91 -
Nystrand, M., Himley, M.1984. Written text as social interaction. Theory into
practice, 233, 198-207.
Rohman, D. G.
1965. Prewriting, the stage of discovery in the writing process. College
Composition and Communication, 16, 106-112.
- 93 -
- 94 -
1
2
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
- 95 -
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
10%
10/20
15%
15/20
10%
10/40
15%
15/30
50%
50/20
- 96 -
1 3
2 2
3
4
5
3
1 6
2 6
3 4
4 2
5
1 6 4
2 6 3
3 4 2
4 2 1
5
1 6
2 6
3 4
4 2
5
- 97 -
1
2
3 4
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
- 98 -
1 70
2 70
3 80
4 90
5
3
1 6
2 6
3 4
4 2
5
1
2
3
4
5
1 70
2 70
3 80
4 90
5
1 6
2 6
3 4
4 2
5
- 99 -
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
1
2 40
3 60
4 80
5
1 70
2 70
3 80
4 90
5 100
1 70
2 70
3 80
4 90
5
1 70
2 70
3 80
- 100 -
4 90
5 100
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
1 70
2 70
3 80
4 90
5
1 70
2 70
3 80
4 90
5
1 70
- 101 -
2 70
3 80
4 90
5 100
1
5
1 70
2 70
3 80
4 90
5 100
1
2 25
3 50
4 75
5 75
- 102 -
- 103 -
70
40
2005 10
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.6
2. 1 35
3. 6
F-2-6-10
F-2-3-3
F-2-3-4-1
1.
2.
3.
4.
- 104 -
5
10
15
10
70
40
2005 10
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
1. 6
2. 35
F-2-3-4-1
F-2-4-3
1.
2.
3.
4.
- 105 -
5
10
5
20
70
40
2005 10
1.
2.
1.
2.
1. 1
2. 6
3. 35
F-2-7-1
1. 14
2.
3.
4.
5.
- 106 -
15
5
10
5
5
35
40
2005 10
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
1. 35
2.35
3. 3
4. 1
F-2-3-4-1
F-2-4-3
F-2-2-1-2
1.
2.
3.
4.
10
- 107 -
7
8
10
15
35
40
2005 11
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
1. 6
2. 6
3. 12
4.35
F-2-3-4-1
F-2-4-3
F-2-2-1-2
1.
2.
3.
4.
- 108 -
5
7
13
15
35
40
2005 11
1.
2.
1.
2.
1. 35
2. 35
F-2-4-4
F-2-6-10
1.
2.
3.
4.
- 109 -
5
10
15
10
35
40
2005 11
1.
2.
1.
2.
1. 35
2. 35
F-2-4-4
F-2-6-10
1.
2.
3.
4.
- 110 -
5
10
15
10
70
40
2005 11
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
1. 1
2. 1
3.35
F-2-8-2
F-2-10-2
1.
2.
3.
4.
- 111 -
15
5
10
10
70
40
2005 11
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
1.35
2. 35
3. 4
F-2-8-2
F-3-1-1
1.
2.
3.
- 112 -
15
5
20
6.
5. 4.
3 1 1
3.
2.
- 113 -
3
3
1 1
4. 3. 2. 1.
- 114 -
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
- 115 -
1.
2.
3.
- 116 -
1.
2.
3.
- 117 -
- 118 -
- 119 -
2.
1.
- 120 -
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
- 121 -
- 122 -
- 123 -
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.123
2.123
3.123
4.123
5.123
1.
2.
- 124 -
- 125 -