Running head: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ART WORK
Qualitative Research Analysis of Student Art Work
Brianna Blackmon-Peterson Dr. Belinda Smith LTC 4240
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ANALYSIS OF STUDENT WORK Introduction Analyzing student art work is important for an instructor of general education, not exclusively the art teacher. Any educator that works with the student should be able to understand somewhat where the student is at with their understanding and representation of art, especially in order to integrate it into the general education classroom. The more comfortable the instructors, like myself, become with analyzing student art, the more our students can be encouraged and prompted to express themselves through art. This will create integrated and effective learning in the general education classroom as well as confidence for the student (in their artwork and beyond, hopefully). For this assignment, we analyzed a piece of student work. We determined the Lowenfeld stage of the students work, as well as characteristics that might be above or below that students primary stage. This assignment gave us deeper knowledge in the traits of stages and the possible meaning and purpose behind the students art. The work I analyzed resembled a dinosaur. This dinosaur had a full body, a mouth with very prominent teeth, and large claws on the feet and hands of the figure. The background consisted of an object that resembles a tree off to the far left as well as a couple very identical looking circular figures that look like rocks at the feet of the dinosaur. One of the most evident features of the students art is that almost a third of the paper is blank underneath the students drawing. Overall, it appears that the student at least has basic knowledge of dinosaurs and their surroundings and has depicted those understandings very clearly in his piece.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ANALYSIS OF STUDENT WORK Description, Analysis, Synthesis After analyzing this students work, it appears this child is in the Preschematic Stage of Lowenfelds stages, First Representational Attempts. Many of the traits of this stage are easily recognized in this students work. It was obvious to me that the student was lacking proportion and geometric relevance as the individual shapes and pieces of the art would be unrecognizable if removed from the whole. The child also seemed to want to fill space on the page near the dinosaur and that is what seems to have motivated his or her lack of proportion between the parts of the dinosaurs body. The student also has objects that are floating on the pageone of the Space Representation characteristics of the Preschematic Stage (Lowenfeld 475). There is no base line or indication of the objects resting on something in this students piece. Although I would place this student in the Preschematic stage most holistically, I do believe he/she is approaching the Schematic Stage: The Achievement of a Form Concept. I noticed while analyzing that the student fits more of the Human Representation aspects of the Schematic Stage, rather than the Preschematic. Although the student did not draw a human in the art piece, the dinosaur does have human-like traits. Of those traits, I feel that the student has almost approached the Human Representation traits of the body of object being composed by geometric shapes as well as the arms and legs being appropriately placed on the object (Lowenfeld 476). In the students work, the dinosaurs body is made up of a several circles for hands, triangles for claws and teeth, and an oval for the main body. The arms and legs are mostly rectangular shaped. In addition, the arms and legs are accurately placed on the body where a humans arms and legs would be placed. I believe this is a strong indicator that this student will likely be approaching Lowenfelds Schematic Stage soon, if he or she has not already. The QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ANALYSIS OF STUDENT WORK student shows a few other signs of the Schematic Stage in the development of a concept that can be accurately repeated and organized on the page (Lowenfeld 476). The student shows these skills by re-creating objects (like the rocks) and not overlapping the items drawn in the piece. In analyzing this student art, I have also categorized this piece with the stages of Embellishing Symbols and Using Space around Objects within the Beginning Stages of Visual Expression of Young Children by the Board of Education in Baltimore County in Art Experience Develop Visual Expression (1974). The significance of this classification is the understanding it gives the viewer of the student art. I know this can help me encourage my students in my future classroom to visualize and orchestrate their thoughts and feelings through art. The stages that this art is between focus on drawing objects of particular interest to the student and then making intricate the details that are most important to the artist as well as creating a more finished product by the addition of item such as borders, base lines, skies and backgrounds (Art Experience 8). In this example of student art, the student showed skill in both of those areas. It appears that the dinosaur is an object that interests the child, but especially the claws and teeth which are accentuated and obviously important. The student also appears to have been satisfied with the dinosaur enough to place other objects, although few, around the dinosaur. It is critical for me as a future teacher to understand that the complexity and stage of a young artist reveals a lot about their visual thinking strategies, their interests, and the likelihood that those traits carry over into their skills and struggles in the general education classroom. The most valued part to me about analyzing and understanding student art work is that this can aid me in guiding instruction to encourage students to talk about, reflect on, and improve their art in ways they desirewhich all will build their confidence and visual literacy (Johnson 74). I know all of these tools are important as I support my future students and integrate art into my QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ANALYSIS OF STUDENT WORK classroom. The more I know about how students express themselves through art, the more I can extend their learning in other subjects as well. Conclusion Most significant of the lessons I have learned through this research and analysis is that student art reveals much more than an image on a page. When I can understand why my students have created the art that they have or hear them reflect on what they want to improve upon in their art skills, I will be able to customize lessons that encourage that behavior or that literacy through art. When students have a general education teacher that persuades and prompts them in their art work in the regular classroom, they will likely begin to learn the significance of the arts and visual literacy. My hope is that my students will benefit by gaining confidence, as well. I hope to be able to question students and instruct students in ways that meet them where they are in their art development and push them to another stage or a deeper understanding of expression. I know that art in a general education classroom can also deepen my students knowledge of the general subjects: math, reading, writing, and social studies. I believe that my deeper knowledge of students development of art stages and my new appreciation for the benefits of art inside and outside of the classroom will help my students be more knowledgeable in core subjects as well as more confident, expressive artists.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ANALYSIS OF STUDENT WORK
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ANALYSIS OF STUDENT WORK References Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W.L. (1970). Creative and Mental Growth. New York: Macmillan. Johnson, M.H. (2008). Developing Verbal and Visual Literacy Through Experienes in the Visual Arts. Young Children, 63(1), 74-79. Maryland Board of Education of Baltimore County. (1974). Beginning Stages of Visual Expression of Young Children. In Art Experience, Development of Visual Perception, 1- 4.