Professional Documents
Culture Documents
20
Reading Comprehension
Strategies
Researchers have concluded that comprehension
strategies should be taught to students as they are
immersed in reading rather than separate from
reading (Block et al., 2002; Keene & Zimmermann,
1997; Pearson, Roehler, Dole, & Duffy, 1992; Pressley,
2002a). Good readers are active and use a variety
of strategies as they read (Keene & Zimmermann,
1997). Direct instruction in comprehension strategies
includes teacher modeling and explaining when and
how to use the strategies, repeated opportunities for
guided practice, and extended independent reading
(Guthrie, 2002).
Comprehension strategy instruction has been
identified as effective at increasing childrens comprehension (National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development, 2000), although most of the
evidence relies on research conducted on only a single comprehension strategy in each study (Guthrie
et al., 2004). The RAND Reading Study Group (2002)
concluded that very little research has been conducted on the use of multiple strategy instruction in the
classroom and called for more studies of this nature.
Pressley (2006) concluded that effective comprehension instruction includes teaching a small
repertoire of strategies, modeling and explaining,
and facilitating scaffolded practice. These comprehension strategies include making predictions and
connections to ideas in text based on prior knowledge, constructing mental images that represent
ideas in text, asking questions and seeking answers,
and constructing summaries of what has been read
(Pressley & Afflerbach, 1995). Recently, researchers
have emphasized that educators must develop a motivational context for reading, provide interesting and
appropriate text, and teach research-based reading
comprehension strategies to increase comprehension (Gambrell et al., 2002).
Metacognition
Kuhn and Dean (2004) defined metacognition as
awareness and management of ones own thought,
or thinking about thinking (p. 270). This awareness
is developmental and takes the form of a continuum.
According to Kuhn and Dean, metacognitive skills
do not typically develop to the level that we would
prefer. We can teach a student to perform a particular strategy in a particular context. However, we must
strive to move the student to the metacognitive level
of operations so that he or she is able transfer this
strategy to other settings once we are no longer providing support. As students practice reading comprehension strategies through active, strategic reading,
the use of the strategies will gradually become selfregulated and students will reach a level of metacognition where they will not only be able to use the
strategies but will also know when and where to apply them (Hilden & Pressley, 2007).
Scaffolding
The idea of scaffolding instruction as a teaching
strategy originates from Vygotskys (1978) sociocultural theory and his concept of the zone of proximal
development (ZPD). The ZPD refers to the range between what a child is able to do independently and
what the child is able to do with the assistance of
a more knowledgeable other. In scaffolding instruction, a teacher provides scaffolds or supports to facilitate students ability to build on prior knowledge
and internalize new information. An important aspect of scaffolding instruction is that the scaffolds
are temporary. As the learners abilities increase,
21
The Study
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of an instructional framework designed to
model and scaffold the use of metacognitive reading
comprehension strategies. The study also provided
opportunities for students to practice these strategies
independently with self-selected text.
This research project was conducted in five thirdgrade classrooms in one school in the southeastern
United States. Five teachers with 81 students in those
classrooms were randomly assigned to one of three
groups. In the control classroom the teacher and
students engaged in their usual read-aloud and independent reading activities without any changes. In
the strategy-only (ST) classrooms and in the START
classrooms, teachers modeled and scaffolded the
use of metacognitive comprehension strategies during read-alouds prior to student independent reading
of self-selected texts. The teachers were familiar with
the metacognitive comprehension strategies and
taught them as described in their basal reading program. However, the teachers did not model or teach
any metacognitive comprehension strategies during
read-aloud.
The importance of self-selected text cannot be
underestimated. By providing students choice of
texts to read, students are more likely to be motivated to read, read more deeply, and may use metacognitive strategies more strategically than those
who are assigned a text (Guthrie et al., 2004). In
addition, students in the START classrooms were
taught to complete the ART (Actively Reading Text)
comprehension self-monitoring recording sheets
during independent reading of self-selected text to
assist in the development of metacognition. These
sheets will be explained in detail in a later section.
All of the ST and START classrooms implemented
the strategy instruction during read-aloud and independent reading of self-selected text three or four
days per week for 20 minutes per day for a total of
40 sessions.
22
Data Sources
Student participants in all classrooms were assessed
using a pretestposttest design and a questionnaire
to determine reading comprehension, the use of comprehension strategies, and reader self-efficacy. The
pretests were administered to all students prior to the
intervention. The interventions took place for a total
of 40 sessions during a five-month period. After that
time, the posttests were administered to all students.
Students in all classrooms were assessed with
the GatesMacGinitie Reading Comprehension Tests
(Forms S and T; 2004) for third grade. The Gates
MacGinitie Comprehension test is timed and uses
a multiple-choice format to assess reading comprehension. Students read passages according to grade
level and answer questions at the end of the passage. Students in all classrooms completed a questionnaire to determine their use of metacognitive
comprehension strategies and reader self-efficacy
(see Figure 1).
Teacher Read-Aloud
Teachers read aloud from chapter books or picture
books during the read-aloud sessions. The START
instructional framework is appropriate for either fiction or nonfiction text. The instructional sequence for
the teacher read-aloud sessions for the ST and START
classrooms began with teachers explicitly modeling
and explaining the comprehension strategy during initial introduction. The teachers then provided
guided practice, scaffolding students during the
read-aloud to use the comprehension strategies with
teacher support.
Teachers modeled and scaffolded the use of the
following eight comprehension strategies:
1. predicting/inferring
2. visualizing
3. making connections
4. questioning
5. determining main idea
6. summarizing
7. checking predictions
8. making judgments
A chart in the classroom referred students to prompts
they could ask themselves when using each strategy.
Figure 1
Completed Student Questionnaire
23
Mrs. H: [to class] When I was reading that paragraph in my mind I saw a persons head
with a little dog inside of it barking. I was
visualizing that when I read the part, humans think by barking in their minds.
Student: I saw that too.
Mrs. H: Good! You were visualizing when I was
reading! Visualizing helps us connect with
the story and understand better what is
happening in the story.
Following the initial modeling of each strategy,
teachers scaffold students to use each strategy during every read-aloud session. The purpose of scaffolding each strategy in every read-aloud session was
to increase students metacognitive ability to transfer
these strategies to their own independent reading.
What follows is an example of Mrs. H scaffolding the
strategy of making connections during a read-aloud
session.
Mrs. H reading aloud from The Boy Who Spoke Dog
(Morgan, 2003):
He ran as fast as he could. His leg muscles burned, and
the air in his lungs rasped. Then the wild dogs caught
up with them. Jack saw them out of the corners of his
eyes. They were running and loping along beside them,
and Jack expected hard, sharp teeth in his neck.
But they did not attack, and this frightened Jack
more. Instead, the wild dogs kept running along on both
sides of them, and they were spreading out in a ragged
line as they neared the top of the meadow and the flock
of sheep. Aaaah! Jack shouted. He had hoped to be
saved by the sheep dogs again, but now he needed to
24
warn them. He hardly had any air left in his lungs. (p.
142)
Student: Breathless.
Another
student: Like Im dying.
Mrs. H: Can you talk very well when you feel that
way?
Students: No.
Mrs. H: Those are good connections to our own
lives. They help us understand how Jack
feels. It reminds you of playing kickball
and feeling breathless.
By the ninth session, teachers were scaffolding
the use of all eight comprehension strategies during
each read-aloud session. Although it might sound a
little overwhelming and time consuming to include
scaffolding of all eight comprehension strategies during every read-aloud session, it is actually quite easily
implemented and flows very naturally into the course
of the read-aloud. Figure 2 illustrates the integration
of the comprehension strategies for each read-aloud
session. If a teacher was reading a chapter book, he
or she scaffolded the use of eight strategies for each
chapter in the book. Table 1 outlines the instructional
sequence that the teachers followed as they modeled
and scaffolded each of the eight comprehension
strategies.
Independent Reading
Students in the control and ST classrooms simply participated in independent reading time as usual. All
students read self-selected text during independent
reading time. Students in the START classrooms completed the ART of Comprehension recording sheets
to scaffold the transfer of the comprehension strategies and improve their metacognition. A reproducible
Figure 2
START Reading Strategies Diagram
Before
reading
During
reading
After
reading
Predicting/Inferring
Visualizing
In my mind I see...
Making connections
Questioning
I wonder...
Main idea
Summarizing
In 10 words or less...
Checking predictions
My original prediction...
Making judgments
My favorite part...
Beginning with the 10th independent reading session, after each of the eight comprehension strategies
had been modeled, students in the START classrooms
completed their own ART of Comprehension selfmonitoring recording sheets during independent
reading. The purpose of these recording sheets is for
students to stop and note the use of each metacognitive
comprehension strategy while reading. This ensures
that students are actively engaged with the text and
increasing their metacognitive use of comprehension
strategies. The ultimate goal is for students to increase
their independent metacognitive strategy use so that
the recording sheets become unnecessary. Figure 3 is
an example of a completed student recording sheet.
25
Table 1
START Instructional Sequence
Session
Comprehension strategy
Session 1
Session 2
Predicting/inferring (scaffolding)
Visualization (modeling only)
Session 3
Predicting/inferring (scaffolding)
Visualization (scaffolding)
n Making connections (modeling only)
n
n
Session 4
Predicting/inferring (scaffolding)
Visualization (scaffolding)
n Making connections (scaffolding)
n Questioning (modeling only)
n
n
Session 5
Predicting/inferring (scaffolding)
Visualization (scaffolding)
n Making connections (scaffolding)
n Questioning (scaffolding)
n Main idea (modeling only)
n
n
Session 6
Predicting/inferring (scaffolding)
Visualization (scaffolding)
n Making connections (scaffolding)
n Questioning (scaffolding)
n Main idea (scaffolding)
n Summarizing (modeling only)
n
n
Session 7
Predicting/Inferring (scaffolding)
Visualization (scaffolding)
n Making connections (scaffolding)
n Questioning (scaffolding)
n Main idea (scaffolding)
n Summarizing (scaffolding
n Checking predictions (modeling
only)
n
n
Session 8
Predicting/inferring (scaffolding)
Visualization (scaffolding)
n Making connections (scaffolding)
n Questioning (scaffolding)
n Main idea (scaffolding)
n Summarizing (scaffolding)
n Checking predictions (scaffolding)
n Making judgments (modeling only)
n
n
Sessions 9 to 40
Predicting/inferring (scaffolding)
Visualization (scaffolding)
n Making connections (scaffolding)
n Questioning (scaffolding)
n Main idea (scaffolding)
n Summarizing (scaffolding)
n Checking predictions (scaffolding)
n Making judgments (scaffolding)
n
n
26
The Results
Students reading comprehension gains between the
pretest and posttest administration were analyzed
to find if there was a difference in achievement between the three groups (START/ST/Control). Results
were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) with instruction as the independent variable and GatesMacGinitie reading comprehension
scores as the dependent variable.
Based on this statistical analysis, students in the
START classrooms made significantly higher reading
comprehension gains on the nationally normed, standardized GatesMacGinitie reading comprehension
test than students in the ST or control classrooms,
with p<0.05. In addition, a one-way ANOVA between
the students in the START and students in the ST
classrooms also showed significantly higher reading comprehension gains for students in the START
classrooms. Another one-way ANOVA between the
students in the ST classrooms and the students in
the control classroom showed no significant difference between the achievement gains of these students. This finding supports the use of the ART of
Comprehension student recording sheets as being
critically important at improving students reading
comprehension.
As shown in Table 2, students in the START classrooms made an average nine-month gain in reading
comprehension compared with a three-month gain
in ST classrooms and a one-month loss in the control
classroom. In percentile ranks, this represents an average 6 percentile rank gain in the START classrooms
compared with a loss of 6 percentile ranks in the ST
classroom and a loss of 15 percentile ranks in the
control classroom.
In addition, as shown in Table 3, students who
were below grade level at the pretest administration
of the GatesMacGinitie in the START classrooms
gained an average of six months in reading comprehension compared with two months in the ST classrooms and three months in the control classroom.
Students were considered to be below grade level if
they scored 2.9 or below on the GatesMacGinitie
reading comprehension test in December. In percentile ranks, this represents an average 10 percentile
rank gain in the START classrooms compared with a
loss of 5 percentile ranks in the ST classroom and a
loss of 2 percentile ranks in the control classroom.
Figure 3
Completed Student Recording Sheet
Table 2
Mean GatesMacGinitie Reading Test Percentile Ranks and Grade-Level Equivalent Scores
Group
Pretest
Posttest
Average gain
Percentile rank
START
ST
Control
53
65
71
59
59
56
6
6
15
Grade-level equivalent
START
ST
Control
3.3
3.9
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
.9
.3
.1
27
Table 3
Mean GatesMacGinitie Reading Test Percentile Ranks and Grade-Level Equivalent Scores
for Below-Level Students
Group
Pretest
Posttest
Average gain
Percentile rank
START
ST
Control
20
29
40
30
24
38
10
5
2
Grade-level equivalent
START
ST
Control
2.3
2.5
2.9
2.9
2.7
3.2
.6
.2
.3
Table 4
Mean GatesMacGinitie Reading Test Percentile Rank and Grade-Level Equivalent Scores
for On-Level Students
Group
Pretest
Posttest
Average gain
Percentile rank
START
ST
Control
53
63
51
59
62
45
6
1
6
Grade-level equivalent
START
ST
Control
3.3
3.7
3.2
4.2
4.4
3.5
.9
.7
.3
28
Table 5
Mean GatesMacGinitie Reading Test Percentile Rank and Grade-Level Equivalent Scores
for Above-Level Students
Group
Pretest
Posttest
Percentile rank
START
ST
Control
85
88
82
87
80
59
2
8
23
Grade-level equivalent
START
ST
Control
5.4
5.8
5.2
6.7
5.8
4.2
1.4
0
1.0
Average gain
29
Discussion
It is a great challenge to meet the wide range of needs
of students in a diverse classroom. It is imperative that
we provide reading comprehension instruction to all
students each and every day to improve comprehension for all students regardless of achievement level.
Direct instruction in comprehension strategies includes teacher modeling of strategies and explaining
when and how to use them, repeated opportunities
for guided practice, and extended independent reading (Duke & Pearson, 2002; Guthrie, 2002; Pressley,
2002b; RAND Reading Study Group, 2002).
With this innovative instructional framework,
I attempted to narrow the gap between prevailing
instructional practice and research evidence in the
field of reading comprehension instruction. Using
this classroom tested framework, teachers enhanced
their reading comprehension instruction, students
reading comprehension achievement, and students
use of metacognitive comprehension strategies.
Teachers using the START framework maximized
the effectiveness of instruction that was already occurring during the school day and did not add more
planning time or take away from other valuable instructional time. The suggestions included here are
not intended to replace other small-group or wholegroup comprehension instruction but to supplement
such instruction.
One of the most important findings from this study
is that this easily implemented innovation improved
reading comprehension for all students, including
struggling readers, average readers, and advanced
readers. It is an easy-to-implement instructional
framework that provides appropriate strategy instruction for all readers regardless of reading achievement
level. The framework met students diverse needs
through modeling, scaffolding, and student choice
of independent reading materials. Because students
read self-selected text at their own reading level during independent reading, the independent practice of
reading strategies was implemented at each students
own achievement level. Students were engaged and
30
Literature Cited
Morgan, C. (2003). The boy who spoke dog. New York: Penguin.
31