In: Anna Roosevelt, ed.
Amazonian Indians: From Prehistory to
‘the Present: Anthropological Perspectives
: University of Arizona Press
Becoming Indians
The Politics of Tikanoan Ethnicity
JEAN E. JACKSON
‘This chapter is a discussion of how an indigenous rights movement among
Tukanoans of southeastern Colombia is affecting their notions about them-
selves and their culture. L argue that the concept of cult
understood does not help us understand these changes because several as-
‘asconventionally
Sumptions underlying it do not apply. I suggest that both anthropologists and
activists promoting the preservation of *
tingly collaborate in misrepresenting what is actually going om.
"To the degree that modern Amazonian Indian groups ean and do choose
to remain distinctively “ethnic” as they are increasingly incorporated
modern society, their distinctiveness changes in its essential nature. Even if
the content of their ethnicity ies that make the group difer-
tent from other sectors of society—appears to be identical wich cultural forms
ot say
character
from earlier periods, the underlying meaning is so altered that we c
these forms are the same (see Barth 1969). Part of the difficulty we may have
describing situations like this stems from a conventional concept of cul
a quasi-biological analogy in which a group of people ate seen as
fe somewhat in the way an animal species has
“having” of “possessing” a cul
fur or claws. In addition, people are thought of as acquiring culture slowly,
during theit childhoods, as part of their development. The culture they ac~
ire existed before them and is seen as their legacy; they are not creating oF384 JACKSON
While culture is understood to change over
in the case of rapid change, ac said to occur,
-n as losing some of its ct lar in some re.
's genes are inherited, cul | even though
superorganic.' To suggest thar people are at times less passive
chat they do create and invent
create” is understood as a long.
People who are seen as engaging in inventing euleure tend ro
‘American Indian groups who
assimilated—into the dori-
used as. spring-
the indigenous
and indig.
cenist' press raw some inferences about how Tukanoan culture is
conceived of by non-Tukanoan Colombian Indians and others incerested in
ides a provocat
he Vaupés are call
kat Tukanoans not so much as
, but asa people who are
ly Tukanoans already are
making sense of theit wor
lure as chey are incre
be draw
is the view
385
model is useful for
for describing how the entire Vi
below
culture more equipped to deal with the fac
change in meaning even though they appear to remain the same. As noted
above, one of the problems with the “: model is that it
até
1988, 329) aspects of cul ‘can promote a
circurnstances of a given threatened people
ure” rather than on other, perhaps
sed in highly
inked to th
cal meanings, the two must be kept separate.
If we see culture as something dynamic, something that people use to adapt
to changing social conditions, and as something that
‘of how culture oper
Jaws and more like a jazz musician's repertoi
‘come out of a tradition, but improvisati
jan about the performance take into con:
the instr
eween those people
mal aspects of cultures
just as to an impor
The analogy stresses the int
‘engages an audience and fellow mus386 saceson
4
ies of inherited forms, ro impart new evaluations or
to borrow forms more expressive oftheir interests, orto create
6 to answer to changed circumstances” (1982, 382). This
ularly useful for understanding the present-day Tukanoan
caxe, particularly with respect to indigenous-rights organizing, because it ab
Ws us to consider the possibility that, a
seen as continuing some oftheir traditional cul
priating chem as apolitical strategy.
Tukanoans are nat to be
al forms so much as appro
twenty-eight formal interviews conducted
lombia during March, 1987 and June-July, 1989. I also engaged in a
ber of informal conversations with native leaders, change agents, resi-
dents (both Tukanoan and white) of Mies, the capital of the Vaupés, and with
individuals in Bogota who are knowledgeable about Colombian indigenous
rights organizing and development efforts among Colombian Indian groups,
All interviewees characterized themselves as concerned about the autonomy
and overall well-being of Colombian Indians. Continuing archival work in
a ‘Vaupés and Bogoté and dissertation fieldwork in 1968~7o have provided
other sources of informat
The Vaupés
‘The Vaupés is in the Colombian sector of the central northwest Amazon, a
longhouses, one per settlement, on
oo near rivers. Longhouses, as well as the more recent settlement pattem of
ges, are separated from one another by two
travel. During this century four to eight nuclear fa
Tonghouse, and present village size ranges any
ty is quite
ten hours’ canoe
ies would inhabit a
re from 15 t0 180 persons.
it most .3 inhabitants per k? (rnonaDaM
1979). The men of a settlement hunt, fish, and clear swidden fields in which
the women grow 1c and other crops.
s of traditional Vaupés social structure, in ascending order of
al descent group, the clan or sib, the (ideally) exoga-
ip, and the poorly understood plaratr
except
(This isasimplifed
crucial respects.)
descent unit composed of from
snsen 1967). Distinguishing features
1; (2) separate founding ancestors and distinet
ge gro
six to more than thirty
‘The Politics of Takanoan Ech 387
se of certain linguistic property such as sacred chants; (4) the right to manu:
facture and use certain kinds of ritual property; and (5) a traditional associa
tion with certain ceremonial or near-ceremonial objects. Membership is per-
‘manent and public; the one fact known about an individual before anything
cle is his or her language group.
Although I am presenting this as a description of “era
is my belief that Tukanoan linguistic exogamy is an extremely dy-
namic and relatively recent institution, the result of indizect pressure from
colonization efforts elsewhere in Colombia, Veneruela, and Brazil (see
smer-lmbert n.d.; Jackson 1983, 164-78). Documentary and archeologi-
‘al information is 0 scarce for either the pre-
periods that we cannot assume much about earlier social or political struc~
tures. Population density was almost certainly greater (see Goldman 19635,
Koch-Grinberg 1903-5; Reichel-Dolmatoff 1971).
‘Although varying internally in some traditional customs, ecology, and
degree of acculturation, the Vaupés is a single society in many respects. This
larity of observable phenomena, ecological
and soci rans’ models of their world,
Furthermore, Tukanoans themselves see themselves as parts of an interacting
whole. Many apparent examples of cultural diversity in the Vaupés are actu
ally mechanisms helping to unify the settlements of the region. Multilingual-
ism is an example: the various languages, somewhat like different uniforms
in a football game, facilitate the interaction by serving as emblems of the
particspating groups.
The earliest explorers were the conquistadors looking for the famed
rado de Los Omagua” in the fist half of the sixteenth century: The first mis
sion, a Carmelite one, was established in 1852 in the Bracilian Vaupés, but
the frst permanent missions were not established until 1914, at Monfort and
‘Teresita on the Papuri River, by the Dutch Catholic Monfortian Congrega~
wn. Salesians built Yavaret in 1929, and in r949 the Order of St. Javier
\ded the Prefectura Apostélica de Mitd, which has administered all Cath-
since then, Protestantism appeared in the 19408 and has had
rgely through the efforts of the near
a Muller, and the Summer
Except for the
iren were attending residential mission schools
ly, education is managed by both the Prefecture
ichers are Tukanoans. Also by the
Tukanoans had
ional” T
homogeneity derives from a
a significanc impact in the region,
legendary New Tribes Mission evar
Insticute of Lin
Pig-Parand region, most
by the mid-sixties. Cures
and the Ministry of Education,
mid-sixties, except for the more tradition:
adopted Western clothing. Some aspects
ly minded,
ive dress are currently being388 Jackson
promoted in the schools, and Tukanoan men will don some ritual parapher-
12 degree to which these at
ikanoan life, With very few excey
Indians in the Vaupés have always lived in or near Mi
some formed on language-
., Union of
im, belongs to the
proper context. To under
ion would require a more chorough discussion
| can offer of the local Vaupés scene and of the people elsewhere in
‘The Politics of Tukanoan Ethnis
ive response to ideas intro-
duced from outside (Hugh-Jones 1981; Wright and Hill 1986)
ccriva was founded in 1973 with the backing of the Prefectura Apostélica
tive crrva members, and many Tukanoans ate indifferes
n. For the most part, Tukanoans living far from Mii are not
ly do not respect the leaders
ons they espouse. We can say that most Tukanoans are less self
consciously indigenist than active ckiva members, and of those who are
interested in indigenous-rights organising, some are not sure that cxtva best
represents their inte ian-non-Indian conflict.
members typify Tukanoans
ow, or they may not
what the furure
wey may represenc che Tukanoan of
changing so rapidly chat itis hard
countered, a summary of reasons wh
ing its cadet position vis-3-vis nonTukanoans. The main fa
lurgent threat to Tukanoan lands or other nat
In the 1970s, the Colombian government instituted wide-ranging legisla
tion affecting Indians that
reseras (reserves)
the state with usuftu390 JACKSON
ing 3,354,007 hectares (Arango and
the Vaupés in 1982. That so much
y no pressure coming from the Indians them:
remarkable. It reflects an extremely uns
Brooke 1990b, 10; Riding 1987; Youngers 1990, 5) and a policy implemented
by a fundamentally weak national government that attempts to win hearts
and minds in the countryside and thus prevent leftist guerrilla groups from
gaining more converts.” Some of the more militant highland Indian groups
played a role in these developments, as well as some ws
und a great deal of discussion
their current status, and
in the Vaupés, Tukanoans
they administer but which they played vi
Brooke 19903, 6). Hence, one of the important factors that can aid organiz-
ing, a perceived mutual threat co land or other natural resources, is missing
in the history of criva. Although Tukanoans face many dangers and suffer
fom dis
assassinations, or imprisonment and torture of Indian activist.
‘One interviewee commented: "We have a problem here because these are
people who didn’t even know they owned the land. . . . obtaining the res-
local Takanoan leaders—pr
jonal and
tion, and so forth—is excremely complex. These various interest gtoups have
divergent goals, and although many sincerely wane whac is best for Tuks-
tnoans, one result of so many outsiders playing a role in the formation and
to grow up. As an interviewee
said “very weak... chese Indians don't have representation in che comm
ands of the mestizes and don’t have direct contact,
s. They were formed in the mission and have interest
sor
rviewee, very much involved
in indigenous grass roots projects and knowledgeable about the Vaupés
marked: “The priests say ‘you have to organize.’ And they [crive
but the priests said that in order to continue managing the people. Th
although they [criva leaders} are artificial officials, this corresponds to the
interests of the mission.”
Another act in Bogota commented that outsider Indians who travel
‘we're going to work with the gente de base [the people of
“But they're bureaucrats, they speak Spanish, they
‘tue the local people may have to learn to
mission played a decisive role in creating criva and undoubtedly sees its
ics who have
‘promotion of the organization as an answer to the many ci
accused missionaries of creating divisions in Tukanoan society.
‘who know the Vaupés have
divide-and-conquer tactics over
rivalry among language groups.
‘mony and homogeneity in the
thas never been known for its cohesion and
In the late 1970s, many Tukanoans qu
and trade goods through coca. Although
ing for Takanoans in the long run, the
inet
colono-induced
where in the country. To some exter
the rapid change and easy cash that392 JACKSON
Id, concerned with regulating prices, the amour
‘of mordida, or payoff, to local
than a coca growers
land whites could c
sometimes federal
is no longer couch
ing in ethnic federations like | Indian movement into the popula
iewee commented:
yes, but with them as the heads. This is unacceptable to
." Another commented that whereas
mnal sectors. This process
jent and effective they |
say, “the comandante commands here, and not the
Howe Je to be made to ui
including some efforts to
Indian revolurionary maveré
anc has a permanent presence in
useful to pay at residents affirm that some succes
tention to —and even to
promote it. A general fear expressed by both Catholic clergy and government
iw i of creating coo much dependency in Tekanoans. For
The Acquisition of Indian Culture from Outsiders
Various found
; le when Tukanoans com-
that he
rot consider Indians to be theit worst enemies, Tukanoans nonethel
presence. After a FARc raid on Mita in Apr
ry base was established,
-ase—among Tukanoans.
va for not being tradi
Jats movement for being too
up in the white world and for not caring enough about preserving
‘Tukanoan culture or developing genuine grass roots activism. One would
kind of critics
suddenly see
be found in Mi
needing to be394 JACKSON
population is 95 percent Indian. A few non-Indians see this asa world turned
Another interviewee favorably compared the paternal authority of a tradi-
al Tukanoan headman to the out-only-for-themselves attitudes of polit-
cians in Mité, And another interviewee, in charge of many development
projects, also took a traditionalist line and commented that all the bad debts
non-Indians have saddled Tukanoans with is a good idea because then, they
will know not co count on the dail
“when the subversives (guerri
they will mistrust chem." One priest sarcastically commented that the
‘way Tukanoans learned about the modern economy was in coca trafficking
“Production, redistribution,
‘And of course there was a ma
“Thus, whereas twenty years ago non-Indians spoke of teaching Tokanoans
the dignity of work and the value of saving money, clearly many factors have
contributed to a changed
1, namely, that Tukanoans face grave dangers by acculturating too
jons at times support the preservation of cul-
rimes even espouse a socialist solution of Colom-
ion. Fifteen years ago
negating Indian ide
centralize, to return to the longhouse, t0 pa
traditional language, clothing, rites, exchange of women.”
wwe have to
‘The Politics of Tukanoan Ethnicity 395
Protestant missionaries have not promoted Indian rights, partly because
they have not had the dialogue with Colombian and foreign anthropo
that Catholic clergy have (see Jackson 1993
formation of groups like criva, the Summer
In part due to the
‘Tribes Mission and
Tol sich previously disapproved
ing manioc beer, and taking the hi
sponsored “Indian weeks" in which ceremonies and dances are performed—a
complete reversal from its position of twenty years ago regarding Tukanoan
ceremonies. The Colombian Catholic Church responded to exticism from
outsiders by forming its own Missionary Colombian Anthropological Center,
launching a publication, Etna, in 1965, and opening an ethnographic mu-
seum in Bogoté in 1975.
‘Another major nonTukanoan source of input about Indian,
which Tukanoans are being exposed derives from the interaction between
criva members and ns elsewhere in
Colombia who visi officials during
began asthe
as a result of the increas:
ing coca market and interaction with outside Indian-rights organizations.
‘An example of the collaboration between criva members and outsiders is
a book written by @ Tukanoan, Jess Santacruz, on Principis Fundamentales
del Consejo Regional Indigena del Vaupés (Fundamental Principles of criva). Ie
contains any number of incorrect ethnographic observations, very probably
due t0 misinformation from Catholic missionaries and non-Tukanoan In-
dians. Publ en by cRiva members in theit newsletter, La Vor de
an Indian and even what it means to be:
tone article speaks of Tukanoans longing for
ing among cribes and clans (in Unidad Indigena, 1976, no. 12, 8). A cava306 JACKSON
leader remarked co me that “The people wanted co end with the sense of
onalism along language group or cla
indeed divisive, | very much doubt if most Tukanoans are ready to stop
auishing among themselves this way. This is a remarkably different notion of
al one.
tioned in these publications. For example, an
scribes Vaupés groups: “To each tribe corresponds a territory whose limits are
clearly recognized and respected; in keeping with tradition and mythology,
this terior is communal propery ofthe enti
ith respect to language group afliation; sometimes, a settlement’s
.eighbors belong to other language groups. Its also interesting that
le does not mention the basis for so much contact: language exogamy.
nguage is viewed in the conventional sense as a marker of
ily is not. In another
lly worked land is given:
territory, which is communal
issue of the paper a romantic picture of commun
(Unidad Indigena, 1976, no. 14,
Land is not worked communal
tions from eriva and oxic publi
cies, a systema desire to presenta part 7
nmantic, idealized image that glosses over ot ignores
confusing or inconvenient factors such as language exogamy, even though
this i a fundamental organiting principle of Tukanoan social structure.
Such quotes provide a glimpse of a new Indian identity and cul
provided by outside-derived images and, in part, by outside polit
example, to assert tribal communal ownership of clearly demarcated lands is
397
les over land tights.
these things about
‘Many examples of this process can be found among Native Americans in the
USS.A. and Canada who have acquired feather warbonnets or drums their
ancestors never used, but which now are important because they signal pan-
Indian identity. What is of value in the Vaupés material is that we are observ-
ing the beginnings of this process.
Rethinking Culture Change
What I have just described is what I referred to above as the process of
‘how can we describe this process using our con-
the very real conflicts between many of thei
ideology. We have seen examples of a new
of
‘Takanoans’ remaining the way they are in some important respects, Bu
maining the way they are” nevertheless involves significant change on the
part of Tukanoans, paradoxical though it may seem, because definitions of
who they are derive so extensively from their increasing interaction with
nonTukanoans.
We have seen that Tukanoans who are influenced by the national Indian-
fs movernent are hearing and incorporating into their self-image several
nal understandings of themselves and their
Colombian Indian groups, because of criva's relative lack of ps
rruction about what being an authentic Indian means is for
jot entrusted to Tukanoans. crtva may in the future develop308, JACKSON
fence-straddling and the margit
Traditional culeural forms that are retained are not necessarily the “sa
if their meaning has changed. This might seem so obvious as not to warrant
comment, but such a point is often forgotten because anthropologists, indig
enists, and others are interested in discovering the connections between
tent traditions and earlier ones. But “culture” is not necessarily an anal
ing Tukanoans do enti
cr if Tukanoans perform a
been retained, As noted above, icisdificult to talk about d
imation, whether ofa ritual or of Indian culture in general, except in depre-
catory terms. Simply to talk of “becoming an Indian” suggests something
inauthentic, insincere, as does che word “Yolklorze.”
‘As Tukanoans are increasingly embedded in Colombian ulture and soci
increasingly come to define themselves in terms of the larger
ple one of how fast are we
participate in the local indigenous-rights movement are finding out
what it means to be Tukanoan ina new way, one differe the way Tuka-
rnoans revised their self-concepts over the past two centuries in interactions
with whites. Young Tukanoans who reside in Miri and its environs are learn
{ng from outsiders not only how to be Indian but also to some extent how to
bbe Tukanoan, The pages of criva’s newspaper that describe Tukanoan tradi
tions in ethnographically incorrect fashion are a harbinger of a transformed
Tukanoan identity. That this transformed identity receives some of its form,
language, and content from other Indians in no way changes the basic process
cof what I am calling folklorization.
‘The Politics of Tukanoan Echnicey 399
‘An important change occurs when, because a vastly more powerful cul-
tural system is making significant inroads into an indigenous culture, che
‘members of that become aware of
trasted to being aware of themselves as a
, is how indigenous
themselves and
ment, a distinction
i that whereas to some extent
indigenism begins wi tha radically different cul-
ture, Indigenism—indigenism with a capital 1, seléconscious indigenism,
along with self-conscious culture—begins when a group of people begin to
appropriate notions of who they are from the intrusive dominant culture,
albeit in contradistinction to it? This is now occurring in the Vaupés, The
analogy about unselfconscious rituals versus folklorized ritual—ritual whose
‘meaning is derived in part from the fact that the audience includes people
from vastly different cultures—is useful. The same point can be made about
in the late 1960s in this self-conscious sense, although at
complained bitterly zbout non-Indians. But Tukanoans are now beginning to
speak in this fashion.
‘As noted above, itis dificult to describe this contrast without introducing
judgmental notions (e.g., “authentic” vs. “deri
the impression that I am judging some cultural traits as better than others
simply because they a jonal as opposed to newly introduced. 1 do
believe there are criteria with which to make such judgments, but they have
odo with the effec ‘being of the
group in question—and sometimes t ‘even in hind-
sight, partly because as an
rive”). Ido not want 10 give
Questions abour ev
faced by anthropology in defining and analyzing cultural units, in particular
when trying to assess change from one type (e.g., a somewhat isolated and
bounded “tribal culture”) to another (e.g., a
“ethnic group,” a group of400 DACKSON
Thave argued that we
18 of various Tukanoan
of
ips, including indig-
The cultural
totally change in
redefined as part of a
ind of Indian identity
as a political strategy.
ince resemblances between earlier forms of Tukanoan culeure and later
this process in nonderogatot
“The northwest Amazon has always presented thomy problems to those
who adopt and promote “cooki ‘models of society and culture. Tuka-
and, although at times exasperating,
extremely worthwhile
ores
“Fhis chapter was originally a paper delivered in 1989 and revised in 104
sraphic data and analysis offered here should be understood ro apply to the
anges have taken place
Constitution in 199
create: Some of hese changes re dcuse i kon 199
19932. 19930, and n.d. a
“The esearch for chapter is part of an on-going resea
40
also ta the Anthro-
pology Departments ofthe National University and the University of Los Andes, che
Ofce of Indian Affairs, and the Colombian Anthropology Institute. Thanks also to
{987 Bennington South American Indian Conference who
stephen Hugh-Jones, Theodore Macdonald, Anna Roosevelt,
David Stoll, and Robin Wright.
1 Some of the literature on ethnicity offers similar ertique. Vincent, for exam-
ple, suggests that we have a “too stolid perception of ethnic groups as permanent
component units” (1974, 376) and asseres
the assumed givens ofa society and their actal
‘of people choosing
Kahn's “ideology.” Many writers argue that embedded in the idea of ethnicity isthe
notion of permanence,
ccatory term. A number of writers on e
‘membership, which "an be narrowed or broadened in boundary te
the specific needs of politcal mobilization” (Cohen 1978, 385-86). Such analyses
cean be fele as a slap in the face of a given group who is making a claim ro land or
defined criteria for member-
5+ Indian-rights consciousness in Colombia goes back to the 19208 when, with
the effects ofthe Bolshevik Revolution, the Latin American communist movernent
spoke about the Indian proletariae and adopced a vision of a "Great Indo-American,
ration” (Pineda Camacho 1984, 211-12). Tshould note that [often use Indian for402 JACKSON
the Spanish indigena. The Spanish cognate, fndio, isa highly pejorative term, which
problems of nomenclature are noc of great
view with regard co the effects ofthe introduction
tonal Progam fr the Desanmen dn Psat) and former president
fe de Nuestra Identdad Nacional ("The Indian:
76, many Colombians who had carried out investigatio
lance among national Indian rights
‘amento Nacional de Planeacin
‘The Politics of Tukanoan Ethnicity 493
Ashem, K-
1981 Makuna social organization: A stayin descent, alliance athe formation of
in the northwestern Amazon. Uppsala: Uppsala Studies
Barth, E
1982
1-8). Washington, D.C.: American Ethnological Society
thc groups and boundaries. Boston: Little, Brown.
‘Of Indian roots, and profs as well. New York Times, 9 September, 16.
B
sacional. Colombia: Direceién
dela Comunidad, Divisiin Asuntos
1988 Conjugated oppression: Class and ethnicity among Guaymi and Kuna
bonana workers, American Ethuologist 15 (2): 328-48,
Brooke, J
19900
to 50% of Clombian Amazon. New York Times, 4
toga Assassins wiping out Colombia party. New York Times, « April, 10
Cass, J
198 inslators! Colombians have doubts. Boston Sunday Globe, 8
Chere, J.
1992 The Wanano ofthe Brasilian Amazon: A sense of space. Austin: Universicy
of Texas Press.
Cohen, R.
1978 Ethnicity: Problem and focus in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthro
the Aboriginalists. Men 23 (2):221~37.ige: Cambridge
1981 ia del Vaupés. Maguaré: Revista del Departamento de Antopologta
onal de Colombia) + June): 29-51.
1992 tomorrow's necessities: Business and barter in norch-
‘west Amazonia, In Bares, exchange and value: An anthropological a
proach, edited by C. Humphrey and S. Hugh-Jones, 42~74- Cambridge:
Cambridge University Pres.
Jackson, |
1083. The fish people: Linguistic exogamy and Tikanoun identity in northwest
Amazonia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
1984 scale societies. Studies in Comparative
32.
1089) 1g culture without making enemies?
744:
tgg1a Being and becoming an the Vaupés, In Nation States ard
Indians in Latin America, edited by Greg Urban and Joel Sherer, 131
in: University of Texas Press.
roth ‘counters between Nukak and Tukanoans: Changing ethnic
‘identity in the Vaupés, Colombia. Journal of Ethnic Studies 19 (2): 1740,
to92 Constructing and contesting Indian culture: Shaman schools and ethno
19938
ro93b
nda jou: The politics of Indianness in the Vaupés,
Cali Anton Eda, nye
Kahn, J
1o8t Explaining ethnicity: A review article. Critique of Anthropology 16
> Spring): 43-52
Koch-Grinberg, T.
1903-5 Zwei Jabre unter den Indianer Reisen in Nordwest Brasilien. 2 vols,
JACKSON
18S.
Thea he Poe in ond cosmology in northwest Amazonia
Berlin: Emst Wasmuth.
‘The Polities of Takanoan Exhinicity 405
‘Micronic
1978 Declaracin del comité de profesores del departamento de antropotogta
de la Universidad Nacional sobre el
‘Agosto, M542 2-4
Pineda Camacho, R.
im de indio en el pensamiento social Colombiano
Jning “otherness: Sapwuahfik cultural identity. Amercian
15 (ah 472-8
Programa Nacional de Desarrollo de las Poblaciones Indigenas (Program for the
spment of Indian Populations), Department of National Plan
ning, 1984. Bogor
nonaoaM (Proyecto de Radargramétrico del Amazonas)
1979 La Amazonia Colombiana y sus Recursos. Bogoté: Repablica de
Colombia.
Reichel-Dolmatoff, G.
tor! Amazonian cosmos: The sexual and religous symbolim of the Tukano
Indians, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Riding, A
1987 Truce between Colombia and rebels is unravelling. New York Times, 20
August, 11
‘Sancacros
1985 Prncipios fndamentoles del Conseo Regional Indigena del Veupes,
CComisaria Especial del Vaupés.
Silverwood-Cope, PL.
1990 Os Mahal: Povo cacador do norest da Amazonia. Brastlia:Editora Univer:
sidade de Brasilia
Smith, A. D.
1986 The ethnic origins of nations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
to85 _A.search for unity within diversity: Peasant unions, ethnic fe
andl
«economic development Six cate
TT. Macdonald, 5-38. Cambridge, Mass.= Cultural Survival
satis in the northwest Amazon. American Anthropolagst 69)
Fishers of menor founders of empine? The Wclife Bible Translators in Latin
rica. London: Zed/Culeural Survival406 racxsow
Vaupés. A
1976 Lascom
June, no,
Index
1982 Europe andthe p
history, Berkeley and Los Ange!
ia Press
History and religion ofthe Baniwe Peoples ofthe upper
vols. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms
Rand J. Hi
9, ritual, and
Negro Ville. 2
Nineteenth-century millenarian movements
in the northwest Amazon. Ethnohistory 33 (1): 31-54
Youngers,C.
1990 Body count. Nation, 2 July, 5
Achagoa tbe, 6 Afonso Pena, F
‘Achar longhourels), 231-33 Agriculture: in
men: and contol of marriages, madic, of
aqo-4r;— Aguaruna jvan
tankamash for, 31-s3rue of weapons satus of, 16
by, 227-28 ‘Aguaruna ei
te: aumatn ceremony of, 232: Agiero, 0.29
in,a33-sq:household Aiur, 84
strvcure of, 2084 and ‘Alcohol depen:
agora: matviage
nin, 236-391 and p
227-a8) traders, shamen, and wariors
234-35: work proceses of, 207-11 Amazon, upper,
‘Achat women: and bith-