Perspectives On Diversity focuses on myths and misconceptions about families. This week's discussion was led by Dr. Jenglazier. She says myths about families are created regardless of validity.
Perspectives On Diversity focuses on myths and misconceptions about families. This week's discussion was led by Dr. Jenglazier. She says myths about families are created regardless of validity.
Perspectives On Diversity focuses on myths and misconceptions about families. This week's discussion was led by Dr. Jenglazier. She says myths about families are created regardless of validity.
Summary and Analysis of Week 2- Perspectives On Diversity
Summary and Analysis of Week 2- Perspectives On Diversity
Jen Glazier TE 825 Dr. Jacobsen June 3, 2014
Summary and Analysis of Week 2- Perspectives On Diversity
Everybody has ideas and experiences that define their idea of diversity. These ideas are formed through personal experiences at home, school, and through the media. These personal experiences create myths about certain cultures, and shape our own definitions of diversity which are then established through the curriculum and materials we supply in our classrooms. We live in a society that believes there has been a change in the way people from different cultures are perceived, but it is clear through schools curriculum and through class discussions that the facts we provide about these cultures are not as accurate as we would like to believe. Many people in the discussion talked about how their curriculum resources did not accurately portray the differences that exist between different cultures. That lack of accuracy, in addition to the personal ideas one holds about diversity, can influence the types of conversations that are held in the classroom. These uncomfortable conversations are not being held because, in this politically correct world, teachers and adults are afraid that they may accidentally offend an individual just by addressing some of the differences. In reality, the fear of offending others has only contributed to the persistence of the problem. After the readings and this weeks discussion it is evident that even as much as we would like to believe our minds are open, myths are created, regardless of validity, about the type of families we have in our classroom. All the group members shared personal experiences to add to the message of the readings for the week. These personal experiences stemmed from views they had when they were younger, to actual scenarios they have experienced as teachers. After reading the Compton-Lilly article, Confronting Racism, Poverty, and Power all members of the group contributed to the discussion by either agreeing with certain myths about families, or discussing different myths they formed about families through their schooling or in their current classroom. Even though it is hard to admit, we all held negative ideas about families in regards to their childs education. Some people found that their myths were inaccurate, while others feared that their myth was more of a reality. Christina (May 26, 2014) talked about how she believed families did not have books in their home. However she found this myth to be incorrect. She started a reading program
Summary and Analysis of Week 2- Perspectives On Diversity
with buddies, and found that through this program children were bringing in books from home, instead of borrowing books from the school library or her classroom. Unfortunately, this was not the case in most of the groups interactions with families throughout the year. Megan (May 27, 2014) held the assumption that parents do not work with their children at home with reading. She found this to be true because of the low income parents having to work odd hours and night shifts making it hard to help with their childrens homework after school. Lashawn gave a very interesting perspective, because she felt that growing up she was on receiving end of the myth. She grew up attending a public school in Detroit, and often felt that she was grouped together with all Detroit Public School students. Even though she felt on the other end of the myth, even she had certain stereotypes about different families. Lashawn felt that many DPS families did not have the necessary resources required to help their children learn to read at home. She talked about how this was based off of her own personal experience. Growing up she had a lot of books age appropriate for her, but never saw any adults read anything, which gave the impression that there were not a lot of resources for her parents to read. The discussion then evolved and began to focus on the different types of expectations we hold for students based off of these myths. There was a debate about whether or not it was lowering expectations when modifying homework. Some group members felt that if you minimized the homework then you were lowering the expectation and decreasing its perceived importance, while some group members reflected on what their idea of homework was. After reading all of the comments, it is clear that even though we try to have open minds about our students we still hold negative views of some families based on our personal experiences and/or the different ideas we were exposed to while we were growing up. When the group was talking about myths and the ideas that they hold about the families in their classroom, a big idea that emerged was the idea of how to get parents and families more involved with
Summary and Analysis of Week 2- Perspectives On Diversity
their childrens learning at home and at school. One idea that was talked about was the idea of use of technology to aide students learning at home. There is a big push today in the market for academic toys and how they can benefit childrens learning. Our group discussed the potential effectiveness those tools could possess, and whether or not families of low income should invest in them. It was agreed that these toys could really benefit children, especially in families where parents unable or felt that they were unequipped with the ability to help their children with their education. Many group members felt that while technology could be a useful support at home, it should be in moderation and in addition to other types of resources in order to maximize the value of learning at home. It was clear to me that everyone in the group attempts to address and/or bring diversity into their classroom. The most popular way of doing this seemed to be through read alouds and discussions. After reading the posts, it seemed that people felt more comfortable addressing diversity when it came to disabilities than race. Not only was this more comfortable for to the teacher, but based on what people shared, it seemed that students related more and had more conversations when talking about people with different disabilities. Everyone in our group talked about how they have either gone out of their way to look for books written in different languages, discussion, or was their curriculum mandated books about different cultures. Curriculum mandated books or guided reading was mentioned a lot as a way to teach students about diversity. Christina talked about how her lessons on different versions of Cinderella were supposed to teach about different cultures. She found that while the books did share the story from a different cultures perspective, the perception seemed to be stereotypical. Our group also spent a lot of time recalling different classroom discussions about diversity and differences between cultures. Christina (5/29/2014) mentioned how her classroom discussions were based on justice, caring, and respect. She did this to create a larger picture, which she hopes will start a foundation for her students when confronted with issues of diversity. As a Special Education teacher,
Summary and Analysis of Week 2- Perspectives On Diversity
Megan (5/29/2014), came into the general education classroom and had discussions about curiosities that the children had. Lashawn (5/28/2014) gave an interesting perspective about how she addresses diversity in her classroom by being the only African American teacher at her school. She also talked about how she tries to bring topics of diversity to her students using teachable moments. It seems that all group members were trying to have courageous conversations and discussions about diversity in their classroom. Whether it was mandated by the curriculum or through different lessons that they had decided to do on their own. As teachers, we want to provide a safe, nurturing and supportive learning environment for all of our students. There is more to this than just looking the part at the surface, there has to be meaningful discussions and resources provided that speak to the whole diversity of your classroom. In order to do this we as teachers must look at our own beliefs and see how they have been impacted our own personal views of diversity. Before asking children to reflect and talk about diversity, we must first do reflect ourselves. To do this, I first want to look deeper into the myths that we as teachers hold about our students and their families. This was a very popular topic that the group talked about in our discussion. While at first it is hard to admit that you hold negative views about your students and their families, it is something that everyone in the group was able to speak and relate too. As open minded as we think we are about students, we still hold ideas about them based off of personal and professional experiences. This discussion shows me that there is still a big problem in schools today, and a reason why issues of diversity are still a crisis. When looking back at the myths the group initially held at the beginning of the year, they all had to do with families being low income, and not being able to provide a supportive educational environment at home. Megan talked about how she believed that her low income families did not want to help their children at home, Christina talked about how she didnt think her families would have books at home, Lashawn spoke about a lack of resources she thought low income families had, and Jamie talked about how she assumed poverty is a cycle. These ideas drew a
Summary and Analysis of Week 2- Perspectives On Diversity
complete parallel to the ideas Compton-Lilly wrote about. We as teachers get some information about our students before the school year starts, and then form opinions about them before even meeting or getting to know more about that student and their family. Most teachers in our group discussion work in low income areas, where they daily interact with students below or at the poverty level. It would be easy to assume, like Jamie, that poverty is a cycle. Compton-Lilly points states My students and their families are assumed to have been born into poor families, to have always experienced poverty, and to be destined to remain poor unless the public schools remedy the situation for future generations. (p.34). We are classifying these families into this poverty category without knowing how and why they are there in the first place. As teachers we assume because they are poor, they lack the resources and the interest in being successful at school. As teachers we must save these families and their students. While sometimes this might be the case for families, often times we surprise ourselves by getting to know people and their backgrounds. This point can be seen as well when we look at how parents are involved in school. Our group discussed the struggles we had with parent involvement, as well as gave many ideas to show how to incorporate families into school. Compton-Lilly reminds us that While parents may not be involved in schools in the ways the school personnel expect, parents do connect with their childrens education in other ways and feel that they are aware of what is happening at school with their child (p.39). As a teacher, I think Lashawn demonstrates how she is thinking this way as well. She talked about how she does not place a limit on parent chaperones or at class parties, but invites all of her students to share that experience with someone from their family. This opens up the opportunity for any family member to be involved in something, as well as not setting up the same parents to be the only ones involved in the classroom. Lashawn also shared a meaningful way that she connects with parents. She email or calls parents to let them know of the physical opportunities that they can have with their child at school, while emphasizing that she knows they are already play a social and emotional part to their childs learning. I thought this was a very powerful way for a teacher to look at how a
Summary and Analysis of Week 2- Perspectives On Diversity
parent supports their education. As teachers we can forget about the social and emotional aspect of learning, because we are only focused on the academic or physical presence they make at school. In reality, it is just as important for parents to be socially and emotionally involved, and as teachers we should not forget to let parents know the significant role they play in their childs success. The idea that one must get to know someone in order to learn the reality brings forth the notion that this would apply for teaching all cultures in the classroom. We hold certain ideas and beliefs about families, so we most likely will hold some of these same ideas when it comes to different cultures. Singleton and Hays point out that, Many beliefs concerning race are based on misconceptions (p. 21). As teachers we must think about these things in order to provide accurate facts to our students and engage in conversations that are not based upon stereotypes. We must first reflect ourselves, and face stereotypes that we hold. Recognizing the misconceptions that we hold about different cultures gives us the opportunity to be honest with ourselves and give us a clear viewpoint of the ideas we want to discuss with the students in our classrooms. Based off of our group discussion, it seems that we all attempted to have these crucial discussions in our classroom. However, often times we run into things that stop us from going deeper. In the example I gave, I had children in my preschool class complete a self portrait of them. I made sure I pointed out different body parts, hair color, eye color, etc, but never mentioned skin color or race. As the children started working, the idea of skin color came up very quickly. I had not discussed the idea of skin color because of my own uncomfortable feelings about race, and not wanting to be offensive or talk to deeply about this issue in preschool fearing what might be discussed. The children were discussing the differences between the browns in their skin color. They had their hands out next to one another making observation about the shades. My students wanted to make sure they represented their skin tone accurately on their self portrait. Even though it was my idea to breeze over it, the children still brought it up because it is an important part to who they are. This idea rings true and is further examined by Singleton and Hays. They say,
Summary and Analysis of Week 2- Perspectives On Diversity
More often than not, students from kindergarten through graduate school find exploring race edgy, provocative, and nourishing. Sometimes a conscious or precocious student does not wait for our permission to engage the taboo topic, and she will make a comment about race that launches an orderly classroom into conflict, controversy, or deafening silence. (p. 18). This shows that whether we want to or not, our students want to talk about these issues. Everyone has a color to their skin, and it is important to talk about that and how people are different. When we do not acknowledge this, we are saying that it is not important and not recognizing one of the qualities that makes a person unique. Singleton and Hays also points out that What is most courageous about interracial conversations about race is mustering the strength to facilitate them (p. 19). As teachers we have the influence to start these powerful conversations about race and differences in cultures. Instead of not talking about the issues, we should recognize the importance of bringing these topics up. This allows students to engage in conversations where they can talk freely about their ideas and opinions, and were ideas can be challenged or agreed with. Before you can have these conversations with students, it is important to realize how you as a teacher are going to be pushed out of your comfort zone, and you must realize the ideas and opinions you hold. Singleton and Hays write that Through normalizing the presence of multiple perspectives, we can avoid a situation in which one dominant way of understanding race invalidates all other experiences and different points of view (p. 20). That is why we as teachers must push aside our fear of these taboo topics, and provide an environment where students can discuss these significant issues.
Social Anxiety and Shyness: The definitive guide to learn How to Become Self-Confident with Self-Esteem and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Stop Being Dominated by Shyness