Professional Documents
Culture Documents
faith. She analyzes the three female characters in Judges 4-5 and
determines how their roles are interpreted by Bible readers today.
Sakenfeld initially does not like that these women are involved
with war because she believes that war is generally a bad way for
human beings to settle their differences (16), and she doesnt think
it should have much of a place in the Bible. This got me thinking about
when is war worth it? Do the end results ever justify the means that
were taken to accomplish them? Jael violated a sacred tradition of
offering protection and hospitality to guests in order to kill a horrible
leader. Many people would find this trade-off perfectly acceptable if
Jael were a man, but since she is female, they think that it is
outrageous. I think it is really stupid that many men think that the
point of having a woman kill Sisera in the story was so that he will be
humiliated because he was killed by a girl. This demonstrates gender
inequality and takes away from Jaels courage to complete the act.
I also found Sakenfelds argument that Jael was acting out of selfdefense because Sisera was going to rape her very interesting. When I
read Judges 4-5, that thought had never crossed my mind, but looking
back on it now, it could make sense. Sisera was a soldier and at that
time, as said to Siseras worried and awaiting mother, there was a girl
or two for every victory (21). I believe that with this story, God id
telling us that rape isnt okay. He shows that the consequences are
immense (such as death) for a person who rapes another person. It is
Work Cited:
Sakenfeld, Katharine. Deborah, Jael, and Siseras Mother: Reading the
Scriptures in the Cultural Context. Women, Gender, and
Community. Westminister/John Knox P: Louisville 1997. 13-22 Print.