20

911
, ,

.
,
.

. ,
.



.
: , ,

.
,
.

, .

6 23 1

. ,
, ,
.
,
(Johnson 2004).

.
,
,
.
(Dumenil 2004).
, ,
,
. 19



.


(Prestowitz, 2003).

.
, , .
,

.
,
( 2005). 911
,
,

.

,
.

.
1776 ,

.

,
.

1800 ,
, , , , ,
. 1823
,
.
,
. ,
,
.
,
,
.

.
, 1836

, 1845 28 .
, 1846

8 23 1

.
1,500 (Gadsden Purchase,

1853).

. 1867
, .
. 1875
, 1890
.
, 1893
,
1893 .
1898 -
(Frey 2004).

< 1> 1898

1836

1850, 1853, 1854

1855

1856

1893

: Frey 2004

.
1898 .
,
.
,
.

(Social Darwinism)
,
,
(Frey 2004).

1898 2 15
. 1898 4 25
1898
.
, 2,000
. -
.
(Frey 2004).
1898 , 1898
.

1901
. 1903

.
1936 ,
.
.

1912 .
.
,
,
(Johnson 2004). 1 ,
,
,
(Beasley 1987: 2).

10 23 1

< 2> 1898-1934

1898

, , ( , , , )

1903

1904

1906

1907

1908, 1912

1909

1910

1912

1912-1925

1914

1915-1934

1916-1924

1916-1917

1917-1923

1918

1921

1925

1926

1932

1933

1934

, T.

1937

: Frey 2004

 11

.
1935 1940 .
1935 6 2 1941 12
(
2001). 2 , 2

.
.

.
, ,
.
3
. CIA
.

1951
.

. 1953
, CIA .

. CIA

.
1951
,
(UFCO) . 1953
270 ,
. CIA
, 1954
.

12 23 1

1959
, .
1960
. 1960
CIA . 1961
4 ,
.

1961 31
.
.

1962 CIA
.
2 . 1966

. ,

.

1970 ,
,
.
.
.
. 1973 CIA
,
.
, . 1990

(Frey 2004). 3
.

 13

< 3>

1953

CIA,
1955

1955-1973

. 1963 . 1964
. 1973

1954

1958

1961

1964

1965-1966
1970

1973

1981-1986
1983

1989

CIA,

,
CIA

,
,
CIA,


, .

800

: Frey 2004 ,

.
50
.
,
, .

,
.
, .

14 23 1

.
,


.

(Johnson 2004, 2004: 17-18 ).

, ,
(

2001). ,
.

1990 , 54
70 .

,
.
,
,
.

.
2001 9 11 ,
.
,
.
.
,

.

 15

< 4>

1990

1992

1995, 1999

2002

2003

.

,
.

.
,

.
, 20
(Theodore Roosevelt)
.
. ,

(content analysis) .
4
.


.
, 1869 ,
.

16 23 1

(commanding influence) .


.

,
.
(duty) ,
. ,
(free self-government)
(responsibility)
.
(provincial)
. 1
,
. ,
(moral) (united)
. (moral imperialism)
, .

. (Old World)
,
.
,
.
1
. ,
. (world

supergovernment) , (restrictive
association) . 1929
(Hoover)

 17

(no desire for territorian expansion) .

1941 2


.

1949
.

,
.
,
.
1953

.
.
.

(world leadership) .
.
,
.

. (globe)
,
.
,

. ,
.
(peacemaker) ,

,
.

18 23 1

.
1977 200
, (moral duty) .

(nobility of idea)
. (purely

idealistic nation) .
,
.
,
.

. 1981 1

.
, (sovereignty)
, ,
. 1985 2
.
4 (MAD)

.

1989 ,
, .
,
.

1993
. ,
(vital interest) .
,
. 1997 2 ,
2
.

 19

, .

2001
. ,
. 2005 2
,
.
,
,
.

< 5>
world

international

power

responsibility /

peace

(wpt*)

(wpt)

(wpt)

duty(wpt)

(wpt)

McKinley

1.29

.32

1.94

T. Roosevelt

3.04

4.05

7.09

3.04

Taft

.37

1.10

.74

Wilson

3.58

2.69

1.34

2.69

Harding

5.40

1.50

.90

1.80

Coolidge

2.71

.99

.99

.99

3.94

Hoover

4.00

.53

.27

4.27

F. Roosevelt

1.44

1.80

Truman

6.17

2.20

.44

.88

7.05

Eisenhower

6.61

.49

1.47

1.47

4.16

Kennedy

5.95

4.46

.74

2.97

L. Johnson
Nixon

8.53

.47

5.22

6.64

Carter

4.92

.82

1.64

.82

Reagan

3.81

.20

2.21

G.H.Bush

2.16

.86

.86

Clinton

5.10

.27

1.34

1.88

.54

G.W.Bush

2.96

1.35

.54

.54

*wpt(word per thousand)

,
1898

20 23 1

. < 5>
.

.

.

. (world)
, , . (international)

. (power)
.

(responsibility) (duty)
. (peace) , ,
. (world)

(peace)

. ,
,

(liberty) (democracy)
.

.

.



.
,

 21

.
. 19
, CIA
.
.
,
.
(

2005).

.
, ,
, .

,
( 2002).
.

,
.
. . ,
.

22 23 1

. : 1935-1941 .
35 3 (, 2001).
. : : , 2005.
. ?
: , 2005.
. 9 1 (, 2003).
, 9 11 : ,
2 , , 2003.
. : 20 21 . : , 2001.
. :
32 2 (, 1992).
. : 8 (, 2002).
. : 35 1 (
, 2001).
Arrighi, Giovanni. Lineages of Empire Historical Materialism 10-3 (2002).
Arrighi, Giovanni. The Social and Political Economy of Global Turbulence, New Left Review,
20(March / April, 2003).
Beasley, W. G. Japanese Imperialism 1894-1945 Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.
Callinicos, Alex. New Mandarins of American Power: The Bush Administration's plan for the World.
Boston: Polity Press. 2003. , : , 2004
Callinicos, Alex. The Actuality of Imperialism Millenniun: Journal of International studies, 31-2
(2002).
Cohen, Mitchell, An Empire of Cant: Hardt, Negri, and Postmodern Political Theory Dissent, 49-3
(2002).
Cox, Michael. September 11th and U. S. Hegemony-Or Will the 21st Century Be American Too?
International Studies Perspectives, 3-1 (2002).
Dougherty, James E. and Pfaltzgraff, Robert L., Jr. American Foreign Policy: FDR to Reagan. New
York: Haper & Row, Publishers, Inc. 1986. , :

: , 1997.

 23

Dumenil, Gerard and Dominique Levy. The Economics of U.S. Imperialism at the Turn of the 21st
Century, Review of International Political Economy. 11-4 (October, 2004).
Fields, Wayne. Union of Words: A History of Presidential Eloquence. New York: Free Press, 1996.
Frey, Eric. Schwarzbuch USA. Frankfurt: Eichborn AG, 2004. , , USA :

, 2004.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. The Global Coliseum: On Empire Cultural Studies 16-2 (2002)
Howard, Zinn. Declarations of Independence. 1991. . :

. : , 2001.
Ikenberry, G. John, America's Imperial Ambition Foreign Affairs, 81-5 (September / October
2002).
Johnson, Chalmers. The Sorrow of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of Republic. New York:
Henry Holt & Company, 2004. , : , 2004.
Kristol, Irving. The Neoconservative Persuasion, The Weekly Standard, 8-47(August 25, 2003).
Kupchan, Charles A. The End of the American Era, 2002. . 2005.

: .
Negri, Antonio, and Michael Hardt. Empire. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2000.

, : , 2001.
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. U.S. Power and Strategy After Iraq, Foreign Affairs, 82-4(July / August, 2003).
Prestowitz, Clyde. Republican, Stepping off the Platform, Los Angeles Times, (August 10, 2003).
Taylor, Peter. The Way the Modern World Works: World Hegemony to World Impasse, Chichester:
John Wiley and Sons, 1996.
Taylor, Peter. What's Modern about the Modern World-system?: Introducing Ordinary Modernity
through World Hegemony Review of International Political Economy 3-2(Autumn, 1996).
Vagts, Alfred. A History of Militarism. New York: Meridian, 1959.
Wallerstein, Immaneul, and Terence K. Hopkins, eds. The Age of Transition: Trajectory of the
World-System. 1945-2025. London: Zed Press, 1996. ,

: , 1945-2025 , 1999.

24 23 1

ABSTRACT

A Historical Retrospect on the Development of the

American Empire in 20th Century

Hyok Kim / University of Seoul

Many intellectuals criticize the reinforced unilateralism of the US foreign policy after
the events of September 11, 2001, and grieve over the establishment of a new Empire.
At this point, it seems very valuable to investigate, through historical retrospect, how
the keynote of the US foreign policy has been maintained. This study approaches the
deployment of the US foreign policy on the basis of historical events, and examines
profoundly whether the policy keynote has been imperialistic or not.
From the analyses, I found that the past keynote of the US foreign policy has been
apparently imperialistic. To be sure, the imperialistic feature of the US keynote is not
based on the past colonialism or territorial expansionism. However, if the US foreign
policy does not intend to accomplish an idealistic integration over the boundaries of
nation states, and tries to survive by expanding its power and hostilely competing with
non-American values, it could be called exploitatively imperialistic.

Key Words: imperialism, foreign policy, military intervention