Professional Documents
Culture Documents
50 percent. We eliminated the New Beginnings store-front school program, adult English
language learner program, and intramural programs at elementary and middle schools.
Supplies and services budgets were reduced by more than 10 percent districtwide.
School districts received some direct support from federal stimulus funds. In
2009-2010, the Title VI-B stimulus of $3.4 million Shawnee Mission received from
TitleVI-B stimulus funds simply went to offset the amount reduced by the state
legislature, but our district did realize $1.1 million in stimulus support through Title I
funds. At this time, stimulus funds, intended to provide short-term assistance, are
available through June 30, 2011.
The districts budget includes $3.5 million for catastrophic special education
funding. In recent months, there has been some discussion about changing this portion of
the special education funding law to significantly reduce catastrophic aid
reimbursements. Meanwhile, the current special education categorical aid funding is
reimbursing only 65% of the excess costs in Shawnee Mission, well below the state
average of 92%. In fact, Shawnee Mission ranks next to last. Based on Kansas State
Department of Education numbers presented to the special education task force last year,
Shawnee Missions reimbursement is $6.1 million behind the state average of 92 percent.
Special education funding will be a critical budgetary concern for Shawnee Mission.
During 2009-2010, Shawnee Mission accessed its full Cost of Living Adjustment
(COLA) authority to offset the loss of revenue from the Johnson County sales tax as well
as the impact of reductions in local assessed valuation. This increased the local mill rate
by 3 mills. Despite implementing significant reductions and including stimulus and
catastrophic aid funds, our district will deficit spend $5.6 million in 2009-2010 (see Table
1). That amount is expected to grow to $6.7 million in deficit spending for 2010-2011
and $12 million in 2011-2012. Our district has maintained fund balances that will be
critical to cover these shortfalls. With our projected deficit of $5.6 million for the current
year, our ending balance is expected to be $18.9 million. If we simply remain on the
current course, which includes no increases in salary, benefit costs, or accounting for
inflationary costs, our fund balances will shrink to $12.2 million due to deficit spending
in 2010-2011 and to $178,000 at the end of 2011-2012.
If all of the budget assumptions occur, the district will need to make further
reductions of $12.1 million prior to the 2012-2013 school year. Any further reductions in
funding will require a much larger cut.
Table 1
Current
Projections:
Revenues
2008-09 Actual
$ 232,975,688
2009-10 Budget
$ 226,348,962
2010-11
Projection
$ 224,181,838
2011-12
Projection
$ 222,320,333
Expenditures
234,778,743
231,996,173
230,890,118
Deficit
(1,803,055)
(5,647,211)
(6,708,280)
12,243,075
Anticipated
Ending
Balance *
$
24,598,566
$
18,951,355 $
*Does not include contingency reserve balances of $5.6 million
234,385,269
(12,064,936)
178,139
Revenues
2009-10 Budget
$ 222,848,962
2010-11
Projection
$ 220,681,838
2011-12
Projection
$ 218,820,333
Expenditures
231,996,173
230,890,118
234,385,269
Deficit
(9,147,211)
(10,208,280)
(15,564,936)
(10,321,861)
Anticipated Ending
Balance*
$
15,451,355 $
5,243,075
*Does not include contingency reserve balances of $5.6 million
The current base state aid per pupil is partially funded by federal stimulus money.
If the state reduces the corresponding per pupil amount in 2011-2012, the district would
need to reduce $17.6 million prior to the 2011-2012 school year to break even and
another $5.2 million in 2012-2013 (See Table 3). If the legislature reduces funding to
school districts beyond these amounts, the cuts required would be much deeper.
Table 3
Projections with a
reduction in BSAPP
Stimulus Aid to States:
Revenues
2009-10 Budget
$ 222,848,962
2010-11 Projection
$ 220,681,838
2011-12
Projection
211,591,586
Expenditures
231,996,173
230,890,118
234,385,269
Deficit
(9,147,211)
(10,208,280)
(22,793,683)
(17,550,608)
Anticipated Ending
Balance*
$
15,451,355 $
5,243,075
*Does not include contingency reserve balances of $5.6 million
Recent reports show that school districts have significant combined fund
balances. Some have looked at these balances as a temporary source of funds to replace a
portion of state funding. As you can see from the exhibits, Shawnee Mission had $25
million in operating funds in this total. The district already plans to use these balances to
offset deficit spending. The district also has balances in the bond and interest ($18.5) and
capital outlay funds ($36.4). The bond and interest balance must be used to pay the
bondholders in October. Capital outlay balances cannot be used for operations under
existing law.
The Shawnee Mission School District currently ranks 262 out of 295 districts in
available operational funds per pupil Our district is fully utilizing all funding for which it
is currently eligible under the formula including all allowable local funding mechanisms.
Even with careful planning and significant reductions, our district, like others in the state,
find that we are committing more funding than available simply to maintain our current
level of programming and service.
The Shawnee Mission School District, with the support of our community, has
faced the budget challenges with which we have been presented head-on. We have
achieved efficiencies to the extent possible without harming students in the classroom.
Our community has seen neighborhood schools close, programs eliminated, and staffing
diminished. Our board of education has vehemently protected the classroom
emphasizing the importance quality instruction and low class sizes have on student
achievement. Despite the funding challenges, our students have continued to achieve at
high levels. Our student population has become more diverse and our economically
disadvantaged population has increased to more than a quarter of our overall population
with some schools reporting as much as 60-70 percent of their students qualifying for
lunch support. To meet the needs of individual students and to continue to advance the
academic achievement of all students and the progress of closing achievement gaps
among identified subgroups, we must have necessary resources.