You are on page 1of 9
OU NEN MOO ONNON SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Sep-16-2015 3:44 pm Case Number: CGC-15-547990 Filing Date: Sep-16-2015 3:42 Filed by: ROSSALY DELAVEGA Juke Box: 001 Image: 05078390 COMPLAINT STEPHEN HOLLAND VS. LYFT, INC. 001005078390 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned. maw roa SUMMONS Sane t08 (CITACION JUDICIAL) (soln io SEA CoRTEY NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: Lyft, Inc., Shanti Adhikari, (AVISO AL DEMANDADO): Anjana Adhikari, DOBS 1-100. YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: stephen Holland | {LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE): | TOTOET Vou have been sued. The cout my doce ape eu wou yourbeng herd wlss you reaped win 9 day, Raed tho infrnaion i be aie "ou hav 30 CALENDAR DAYS aha this sunmons an lgal popes ae served on youl Me a wlten response a this cout and have 8 copy sored on the pit letter phone cl wilt pratecyu,Your writen reponse ust be nope tga fom you wan he cov tea Your cv | ann Satan oun an Zope, ra ra ioe cate snd min a Corin Ca Soe Sees Cntr mn crn eto) or ny iy ray, oh noe few a. You cae t h | cou fe wow form you so not le Your rponea on te, You may los hs casey defau, and your wages, money, and propery \ tayo taken wihou futher waring rom fe cout “There are olhelogalrequremortn. You mey want to cl an tome right eway. you donot know an want callan swirl arica yu cant rd tomes. you mey beeper arlene Yom a nnpro eg somone niacin Seca nonptgaup ane Ca ape Seren ass ron ioalionsn. og), he Calera Cour One Sl ap Cu www courtinfa,00.¢ or by. your local court or county bar association. NOTE: The court has a statutory lien orate fees and | Seay ay sctemect xc rao aor of 16,00) mare ai ese The cars ian mst eps batre nec wa Same a cae. {AWS0r Lohan demands SP respond eto de 3 as, care pode deco con Si oxccharsvvrn.Len/a mforectn @ | crayon nen cpt al amanda, Una carla sna tamed i prelogen Su repunta por sano fore Gun elar at haar ans reg iro una fameda totes no i ar om toga comeco Ses ay cn ns ge post au hyn ara eld nda ras apse | Fado oncrtar ue stra ect y mds armas o of Ca Ge Xs ns Cotas Catars ac x Se) on | Iibiotre do loys do eu cond oan la corte quo le quade ms cores Sino puede page la clade prosontack, ncaa. corte | cual an mde de eon de pogo dt po outa susp ono, puede Pro cao pa ammo ¥ Wee ‘Tay dine oni ees Exresmendnde mn shook fnedaamari, ro ros an soda, led ana un sac ek | atop pnd poze coeds ene cura ac pare blero sons pelos rato do ‘ropoma de sores ngs a as toca, Puawe encontrar asta poe Sr fresco kro ena ao web Se Caer Logl Servis, freon) a ol aioe Acne sso cal, sco.) o penn Cnc cn aco. ogaiss cae ASO: Pra cre are catia caer sas yo elo bros pote im rear Sie or racoporacn do 810.0006 mts Ge valor eebide moder un cuore 0 una concesion Ge eH mee Ul aco Ge CoRcNe OV. Tee Qe ol gravamen de a corte anlos de que la corte puede desecha 0230. ‘lame and address ofthe court fs nee (El nombre y crecet6n dela corte 0s): ea San Francisco Superjor court id 400 McAllister st. 400 McAllister St. * San Francisco, CA 94102 The nam, adress, and felephone number of plants attorney, or plintt without an attorney is (El nombra, le direccién y ef nimero de teléfono del abogedo del Frank C. Liuzzi (158226) Liuezi, Murphy, Solpmon, Churton & Hale 235 Montgomery St.,, Suite 854 San Francisco, CA 34104 ue no tone aboged, 08): under: [=] COP 416.10 (corporation) (CCP 418.60 (minor) (coe 416.20 (detunct corporation) GP 416,70 (conservateo) [1 CcP 416.40 (association or partnership) [“] CCP 416.90 (authorized person) otter speci): 4. (by parsonal deiwery on (dete): rronsets "eieandenane” ‘SUMMONS lifts Caine A + i PLD-PI.004 BY FAX “AGRE OR PAT WTO TORE as Bara FRCORTEORY | Frank C. Liuzzi” (iseeze) Liuzzi, ‘Murphy, Solomon, Churton & Hale LLP 235 Montgomery’ St. Suite 854 San Francisco, CA 94104 SST ' ee LL, ED [fea Stephen fotdend* ———PLERKOF Ts COURT (J pees 170 100 smectvootess 400 McAllister St. sowne coness. 400 McAllister St. erawzecooe San Francisco, CA 94102 SEP 16 2015 * DEFENDANT: Lyft, Inc., Shanti Adhikari, Anjana Adhikari ‘COMPLAINT—Personal injury, Property Damage, Wrongful Death ‘Type (ehock all that apply): CK) MOTOR VEHICLE: CEJ OTHER (specify: Gen. Negi interest per Civil! Code Section 3294 (J AMENDED (Numbor): 1 Property Damage (X) Wrongful Death (Personal injury C2 Other Damages (specify): Pre judgment. 1 ‘Turiadiction (check all that apply): [1 ACTION IS A LIMITED CIVIL CASE (1 AcTiON Is AN UNLIMTED CIVIL CASE (exceeds $25,000) [1 ACTION 1S RECLASSIFIED by this amended complaint {from limited to uniimited {rom unlimited to limited. Amount demanded |] dos not oxceed $0,000 CGE="75 -547990 ‘exceeds $10,000, but does not exceed $25,000 Plaintiff (name ornames)/Stephen Holland alleges causes of action against defendant (name ornemes): Lyft, Inc., Shanti Adhikari, Anjana Adbikari, DOES 1,100 ‘This pleedng, including atfachmens and exhibits, consist of the folowing numberof pages: 6 Each paint named sbove isa competent adit &. (J except paint (name): @ [_] a comoraion qualified todo business in Calfomia @) [en unincorpsratedentty (describe): © [J a pubic entiy (dosed) (6) J aminor (23) an adut {@ [1 for whorl a guarcian or conservator ofthe esto or a guaran ad tem has been appointed (0) FJ other (speci: © (J ether (speci: &, except psintt lames a) 4 ‘a corporation qualified to do business in California 2 an unincorparated entity (describe): (3) [) a public entity (describe): (@) ({)_aminor ‘an adult {@ C1 or whom guardian or conservator ofthe estate ors guaran ad item has been eppotnted ©) otner spi (© () other (specity): [= Information about adctionalplsntifs who are not competent adults is shown in Attachment 3. oe Faso Sea ‘COMPLAINT—Personal injury, Property La nance eater ' ‘Damage, Wrongful Death 5 PLD-PL.0O1 SHORT TITLE: Holland v, Lyft (CASE MINDER 4.) Piaintit (rae): Is doing business unger the ficitious name (specify): ‘and has complied with the fictitious business name laws. 5. Each defendant named above is a natural person 2. 1X) except defendant (name): Ly£t, Inc. ¢. (1) except defendant (name) (1) [1 a business organization, form unknown (1) (=) a business organization, form unknown @ eration @) — acorporation @ [J anunincorporated entity (describe): ‘@) (an unincorporated entity (dosenbo) (4) (2) a public ently (dascribe): (4) (J a public entity (describe): (©) [1 other (specify): (©) (J other (specity): ©.) except defendant (name) 4. 51 except defendant ame): (1) 2) business organization, form unknown (1) a business organization, form unknown @) [J a corporation @ () a comoration @) (1 anunincorpbrated entity (describe): (©) [J an unincorporated entity (desorbo: (4) [) a public entity (describe): (4) () @ public entity (describe): ©) (J other (specify): (6) J other (specify): [information about additional defendants who are not natural persons Is contained in Attachment 5, 6. The true names of defendants sued as Does are unknown to pati. ‘a. EX) Doe defendants (specify Doe numbers): 1-100 were the agents or employees of other ‘named defendants and acted within the scope ofthat agency or employment. ». [iE] Doe defendants Yspectly Doe numbers): 1-100 fare persons whose capacties are unknown to Plaintift. & 7. J Detendants who are joined under Code of Civil Procedure section 382 are (names): {8 Thig court is the proper court because a. [oC atleast one defendant now resides ins jurisdictional area. b. [2] the principal place of business of a defendant corporation of unincorporated association isin its jurisdictional area. c. [injury to person or damage to personal property occurred ints jurisdictional area. d. EJother (spent): + 8. (| Plains required tp comply with a claims statue, and 3. [-] hes complied with applicable claims statutes, or . [7] is excused trom éomplying because (speci): ae dl ‘COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property Pon zo Damage, Wrongful Death PLD-PI.001 ‘SHORTIME Holland v. Lyft ASE NER 10. The folowing causes of acon ae ataced andthe alements above apply o wach (each complaint must have one or more causes of ection attached: ic) Motor Venice b. LX] General Negligence & LJ] Intentional Tort 4.) Product Lib CE] Premises tibity £ Totter pects; 11, Plu nas sures 2.) wage loss b. LJ 1088 of use of property ©. [hospital and mjcial expenses 4. GE) general damage ) property damage 1. J less of eaming capacity 9. Gi] other damage fapeciy): Wrongful death damages; Prejudgnent interest. 12, [1_ The damages claimed for wrongful death and the relationships of plantifo the deceased are 2.) tated in Atachment 12 ». CE) satotowe:* The wrongful death claim for the death of Shane Holland is brought by plaintiff Stephen Holland, the father of decedent Shane Holland. 18, The relief sought inthis complaint is within the jurisdiction ofthis court 14, Plaintiff prays for judgment for costs of sult for such relief as is fir, just, and equitable; and for 2. (1) [XE] compensatory damages @) (1) punitive damages “The amount of damages is (in cases for personal injury or wrongful death, you must check (1): (1) [XJ according to proof @) [J Inthe amount of $ 0.00 15. [XC] The paragraphs ofthis complaint alleged on information and belief are as follows (specify paragraph numbers): MV-1,2; GN-1, all other allegations owe: F/L 1 cee FE > Frank Ulnar ae Se ‘PLD-PLCON pv. darwony §, 2007) COMPLAINT—Personal Injury, Property Leki Damage, Wrongful Death PLD-PI.001(1) SHORTIME Holland v. Lyft cost CAUSE OF ACTION—Motor Vehicle Tarbey ATTACHMENT TO [X] Complaint (cross - Complaint (Use a seperete cause of action form for each cause of action.) Plaintif (name): Stephen Holland MV-+1, Plain alleges the acts of defendants were negligent; the acts were the logal (proximate) cause of inion and damages to pail; the acts occured on (dole! Noverber 1, 2014 at (place): Highway 1-80, Westbound, 0.9 miles west of Riverside Ave. in the City of Sacramento, State of California. Mv-2, DEFENDANTS! @. LX) The defeidants who operated a motor vehicle are (names): Shanti Adhikari Cope 2 ito 9 b. [The defendants who employed the persons who operated a motor vehicle inthe course of thelr employment are (names): Ly£t, Inc. [1 Does 10 to 25. ¢. [The defendants who owned the motor vehicle which was operated with their permission are (names): Anjana Adhikari [x] Does. 26 _ to 35 _ 4. [X_] The defendants who entrusted the motor vehicle are (names): Lyft, Inc., Anjana Adhikari [0 Does:36. to 45 ‘e. [The defendants who were the agents and employees of the other defendants and acted within the scope ‘ofthe agency were (names): Lyft, Inc., Shanti Adhikari, Anjana Adhikari [xi does'a6 te 59 £. CFT detendans wio ae ible o paint for ther reasons and the reasons forthe Habit ae CoC] tstedin Atachmant MV-21 » CX Jao follows Pisintitt ie inforeed and believes and thereon alleges that each of the flotitioualy naned etendants, D065 1-100,ver® acting aa an agent, servant, eaployee, special eaployee, alter tsp, successor in interest partner, joint venturer,lensee and or Ticenses of each of the otha towed defendante, ratified and approved the acte of che others and were in sone tamer negligent tod remponsible for, ae well ap « aubatantie factor in causing, che occurrences and damages {x} 000s. 60. to 74 fee aide Canel a Cora CAUSE OF ACTION—Motor Vehicle sols anon uw Dun fone 2007 PLD-PI.001(2) SHORTTITLE: Holland v. Lyft ‘CASE MaME CAUSE OF ACTION—General Negligence Page 5 ‘Gombe ATTACHMENT TO; [3C] Complaint [—] Cross - Complaint (Use a separate cause of action form for each cause of ection) GN-1, Plalntif (name); Stephen Holland alleges that defendant (name): tyft, tac., shanti Adhikari, Anjana Adhikard, who vere at all relevant eines the agente, servants, employees, special enployees, joint venturers, alter ego, and/or ‘successor in interest of each other and all other defendants herein and who vere at all relevant eines mentioned herein acting in the course and acope of said agency, service, joint venture and/or cenploynent. (X) Does 76. to 100 ‘was the legal (proximate) cause of damages to plaintiff. By the following acts or omissions to ac, defendant negligently caused the damage to plaintif! on (dale): Nov. 1, 2014 at (place): Highway I-80 westbound, 0.9 miles west of Riverside Ave. in the City of Sacramento, State of California. (doscrption of roasons for lab): ‘That ot said time and place, defendants, and each of them, negligently and carelessly investigated, researched, ized, trained, retained, employed, contracted, supervised, controlled, had a right to control, and/or instructed defendant Shant{ Adhikari; said negligence and carelessness, ae aforesaid, was a legal and aizect cause of, fs subotantiel factor in causing, the death of shane Holland and the danages herein anleged, i Purther, 4a that defendaits, and each of then, intentionally, and/or carelessly and/or recklessly created the Ampression that Shanti adnikari vas an exployee and/or agent of Wyft, Inc. Plaintiff and decedent shane MoLland were harmed as tiiey reasonably relied on this inpreavion and beliet. and exch the were acting ae an agent 1 partner, joint venturer, lessee and/or licer apptoved the acta of tne“others and were in sous manner negligent and responsible for, substantial factor in easing, the occurrences and damages alleged herein. srvant, employee, special employer ee of each other, ratified and Porther in that at said Cine and place, defendants, and each of then, vo negligently and carel eased, controlled, entristed, operated, drove, maintained and serviced their motor vehicle to crash, causing decedesit shane Holland to sustain aovere physical injuries reeulting in his death and causing the danages ax aFleged herein; sald negligence and carelesen aforesaid, wae a legal and direct conuse of, a9 well ax # substantial factor in causing the death of Shane Holland and the damages herein alleged. page t Ta aS TTS ORO Camaros a ements CAUSE OF ACTION—General Negligence shi upott ew sesey 42007) is TONEY GATT WATT TOE pm Sw oar sda [Frank C. Liuzzi (158226) Liuzzi, ‘Murphy, Solomon, Churton & Wale LLP 235 Montgomery’ st. Suite es ‘i San Francisco, CA: 94104 ‘Tsmoeno: 415-400-7000 raxno: ‘415-400-7055 | arronerron twos: Plaintiff steve Holland | SEP 16 2015 swine mone 100 Hesiiasese See OLE ihinewoess 400 MoAllister St. PLERK OF THE CouRT crvmoze coo San Francisco, CA’94102 t PILI, panne Galanleed Surlediction Sm PJROASENAME: Holland v. Lyft “a cIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation SEE L Unlimited [_]Limited () Counter [_] Joinder GArmount (irrourt Filed with frst appearance by defendant | X00e. WWee_stcvede $5,000 $25.80 les) (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3402) | oer items 1-6 below must be completed (see instructions on GP sincera sneer ~CeC—7 5-547 99) AY” tuto tort ‘Contract 3 “iv Livgation Aut (22) : ( broset ot conractrranty (08) (Gal: Rus of Cour, rues 3400-3408) Uninsured motorist (46). Rule 3.740 collections (09) 8 Antitrus/Trade regulation (03) ‘Other PUPDIWD (Persona iuryProperty 7 CConsruction defect (1 Daraenrongn aw TH 5 than oer (8 Cec asbestos) Other enact (37) secures tigation (2) rroavattabiny 20) | Real Property ( envronmemalToxs tnt (30) (mecca mabpracticn 68) eninet domateverse (F traurance everago csi ang fom tno (other Pupon (23) ‘condemnation (14) ‘above listed provsionaly complex cose NomPIPOIWD (Other Tet! (2 Weengut evetion (33) typos at) 2 Business torvunfa business practice (07), —] Other real property (26) Enforcement of Judgment lew nin 08) Uninwtl Osta [1 Extoroomantofjuent (2) oetemation i) (Jeommerit (9) ‘Mizcotansoun Civil Complaint rea 16) 4 (J rontenut 32) Crcoen inetocua property (19 Jonnee8) [oer compan (rt specited above) (2) [ Proessona ngigance.(26) ual Review iacotaneous Ci Petton Jotner non PVPOOWD tort (25) asset tir (05) = Parnoranip and exrporate governance 21) Employment a = Petition re: arbitration award (11) [__] Other petition (not specified above) (43) Wren eminaton 08) (Jw t mana (02 [Jotter employment (8) lotr usc revi 26) 2 Tis case [—] ls [XK] fsnot complex under rule 3400 ofthe Galforia Rules of Cou. the Gass complex, mark the feo eaureg excepto dial manana 2. LJ Large number of separately represented pares 4. [—] Large numbor of witnesses 5. 1 Extensive motion practice raising diffcut or novel. [—-] Coordination with related actions pending none or more courts Issues that will be time-consuming o resolve in other counties, states, oF countries, or ina federal court oC Sette ames of docimeriny dence, (| Sittanal oefugmant ud spevien Remedies sought (check all that apply): a. monetary b, [—] nonmonetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c, [—] punitive 8 4. Naber lease of acon ape: 2 5, Thiscase [—] is isnot aclass action suit. €: oe oeanykoun ltd caet and eee note ofr cvs nr er Spm * Plaintiff must file this cover sheet with the fst par proceeding (except under the Probate Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Cour, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result In sanctions. « File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rue. { Ifthis case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. ofthe California Rules of Cour, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all ‘other parties tothe action or proceeding, ‘+ Unless this isa collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only. CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Ta Roel ro SS SAT Fam jedi taney me "Sa Sancta aon 310 toiner aay mT ! INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO COMPLETE THE COVER SHEET CM-010 ‘o'Plantife and Others Fling First Papers If you are fling a frst paper (or example, a compiain in a cil case, you must ‘complete and file, along with your fst paper, the Civ! Case Cover Sheet contained on page 1. This information wil be used to compile satisics about the types and numbers of cases fled. You must complete items 1 through 6 on the sheet. In item 1, you must check ‘one box for the case type that best describes the case. Ifthe case fits both a general and a more specific type of case listed in ier 1, check the more specife one. ifthe case has multiple causes of action, check the box that best indicates the primary cause of action ‘To assist you in completing thé sheet, examples of the cases that belong under each case type in item 1 are provided below. A cove sheet must be filed only with your initial paper. Failure to fle a cover shoot withthe fist paper fled in a civil case may subject a party, its ‘counsel, or both to sanctions ufider rules 2.30 and 3.220 of the California Rules of Court. To Parties In Rule 3.740 Collections Cases. A “collections case" under rule 3.740 is defined as an action for recovery of money owed inva sum stated to be cartan that Is not more than $25,000, exclusive of interest and attomey’s fees, arising from a transaction In which property, services, or money Wes acquired on credit, A collections case does not include an action sesking the following: (1) tort Jarnages, (2) punlve damages, 2) razver of fel propery, (4) recovery of personal property, o (5) aprojudgment wit of attachment. ‘The Identification of a case 88/4 rule 3.740 colleclons case on this form means that it will be exempt from the general time-for-service requirements and case management rules, unless a defendant fles a responsive pleading. A rule 2.740 collections case will be subject {to the requirements for service’and obtaining @ judgment in rule 3.740. To Parties in Complex Cases. In complex cases only, parties must also use the Civil Case Cover Sheet to designate whether the case is complex. I a plaintiff believes the case is complex under rule 3.400 of the California Rules of Cour, tis must be indicated by completing the appropriate boxas in tems 1 and 2. fa plaintif designates a case 8s complex, the cover sheet must be served with the ‘Complaint on all parties to the action. A defendant may fle and serve no later than the time ofits first appearance a joinder In the rans dcigetion counteoagnation hate cav se comple or, iho an he ade no deonaton a deanna Bre cave aconplon CASE TPES AND EXAMPLES Auto Tort. { Contract Provistonally Complex Civil | neon (Cal. hs G2)—Penca nana Broach of Coca (0) veo Coun Roe Sat) ‘Damage/Wrongful Desth + Breach of RentaiLease Antitrust/Trade Reguiation (03) Uninet Ge Conc Dene) os ees Sram tame ovr ia Tot moor cum suet Securingsion 2) oaate cnc om] Enaornt Tse 00) iat Ai insane Comoe Cara ter PUPDAND avon (oan am poe Property Damage/Wrongful Deane case type listed above) (41) Ose 1 Enforcement of Judgment ty ‘Enercon of Segre 20 sess Property Danas core ueee? ‘Wrong Death County) Product Liabiity (no asbestos or ‘Confession of Judgment (non- ‘orifenvironmental (24) omeste relations) edical Malpractice (45) ‘Sister Site Judgment ‘Medical Malpractioe ‘Administrative Agenoy Award Physicians & Surgeond (oot wala) crite Sean ir conre Bopue pan nc of ny ot ips fat roar "cael Teen nec rUPORNE ES)! net Sonatas Cte Encement gre romney (69. Cosdornton a tna SherRanPmtyeg sutton as) Nesey Comi Intentional Bodily tnju i soetegs sso ance) Wiel Porsentan of Rel Property ie Sot ot at in inf “re ove) (42) neon es et Te uty (toi Brecon Roll Oty Neolgent icon st oman ncooan ‘nunc Rat Oni Fron Erional Dstvons one : ‘arassment) oer prom Sol wocrncs tion Noneuom (ote Tot, cena 3) ror To Bates Fence 2) Prats) i De) case ines cua gt (on dace, “og cc so ors ine sed (nox ‘spot ao Comme Ptr) torsamard On 5 Just vow out, Set eh Seve are) °) Folio fe maton md (1) Fraud (16) : ‘Wit of Mandate (02) dove) (43) Fim Prepay 9) ‘itn Mandamus Pretest Nepigeres 25) Wontar on es Sat reer ‘ane ater (tne Professional Malpractice ‘Wri-Other Limited Court Caso (ot medal olga? Fito Potton forName Change eens ter nfl Rovew 2) enter a PHFD Ton Se rr Felon Rta to tate ‘Wrongful Termination (96) Notion of Appesl-Labor ‘Other Civil Petition Ohertmpoymat ‘Sammie: Appeals ‘Sapo oy 2077 CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET aad

You might also like