Redesigned-Sat-K12-Using-Scores-And-Reporting-To-Inform-Instruction-1 1 1

The SAT Suite of Assessments:
Using Scores and Reporting to

Inform Instruction
About the College Board

The College Board is a mission-driven not-for-profit organization
that connects students to college success and opportunity.
Founded in 1900, the College Board was created to expand access
to higher education. Today, the membership association is made
up of over 6,000 of the worlds leading educational institutions
and is dedicated to promoting excellence and equity in education.
Each year, the College Board helps more than seven million
students prepare for a successful transition to college through
programs and services in college readiness and college success
including the SAT and the Advanced Placement Program.
The organization also serves the education community through
research and advocacy on behalf of students, educators, and
schools. For further information, visit www.collegeboard.org.
Special thanks to the College Boards K12 Assessment Redesign
Steering Committee for providing feedback on the SAT Suite
scores and reports and other resources for educators. The
K12 Committee was convened in spring 2014 to advise the
College Board on assessment implementation challenges and
opportunities and to advise on the needed tools and resources
most important to K12 educators. Participating districts include:
Bangor School Department, ME
Cincinnati Public Schools, OH
Fort Bend Independent School District, TX
Long Beach Unified School District, CA
Montgomery County Public Schools, MD
Orange County Public Schools, FL
2015 The College Board. College Board, Advanced Placement,
Advanced Placement Program, AP, SAT, Student Search Service,
and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of the College Board.
AP Potential, PSAT, and SAT Subject Tests are trademarks owned
by the College Board. PSAT/NMSQT is a registered trademark of
the College Board and National Merit Scholarship Corporation.
Excel is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation.
Visit the College Board on the Web:
www.collegeboard.org.
Khan Academy is a registered trademark in the United States and
other jurisdictions.
t h e s at s u i t e o f a s s e s s m e n t s :
u s i n g s c o r e s a n d r e p o rt i n g to i n f o r m i n st r u c t i o n
Dear Educator,
Throughout the 2015-16 school year, your students will have
the opportunity to participate in one or more assessments
in the SAT Suite of Assessments, including the redesigned
SAT and PSAT/NMSQT, as well as the new PSAT 10 and
PSAT 8/9. The assessments in the SAT Suite are more
purposeful and focused than ever before, designed not
to be one-time testing events but rather an assessment
system that informs students and educators about academic
progress over time.
When students engage in challenging course work each
day, they give themselves the best chance to succeed.
To support students on the road to college and career
readiness, the College Board has designed the SAT Suite
of Assessments to assess the knowledge and skills taught
and learned in classrooms like yours. In order to measure
student progress toward college and career readiness, we
know you need meaningful assessment data and reports
that will inform you about your students progress, their
strengths, and the areas in which they can continue to work
to get ready for college and career.
This guide will provide you with information about the tools
and reports that will help you understand and interpret
student scores. It also suggests ways to connect reported
information with classroom instruction, to monitor student
progress, and to use data to review, evaluate, and adjust
curriculum. These recommendations are intended to
support teachers across all content areas and enhance
instruction that will build skills necessary for college and
career success for each student.
In addition to this guide, look for several free and valuable
assessment resources, including:
The Redesigned SAT Teacher Implementation Guide,

designed to help you understand the content and structure
of the redesigned SAT.
Practice opportunities for students through the College

Boards partnership with Khan Academy free,
personalized online practice, including the release of four
redesigned SAT practice tests.
Online professional development modules, webinars, and

resources to inform your lesson planning to make sure your
students are ready.
Resources for school and district leaders, including links to

tools to help students, parents, and educators understand
the changes to the assessments.
A Counselor Implementation Guide that supports the work

of counselors as they help students navigate college and
career decisions related to the redesigned SAT.
We know how pivotal you are to the success of your
students and how our goal of propelling students into the
success theyve earned is only possible with your help.
Our College Board team looks forward to strengthening
our partnership with you in order to go beyond delivering
assessments to delivering opportunity.
If youd like to send a question, comment, or idea
about this SAT Suite of Assessments: Using Scores and
Reporting to Inform Instruction guide, please email
SATinstructionalsupport@collegeboard.org.
Sincerely,
Cynthia B. Schmeiser
Chief of Assessment
The College Board
Contents
Section 1: A Comprehensive Assessment System
Overview
The SAT Suite of Assessments
Scores Across the SAT Suite of Assessments
Consistent Information Reported Across Assessments
10
Vertical Score Scale
10
College and Career Readiness Benchmarks
12
Section 2: Using SAT Suite of Assessments Scores and Reporting to

Inform Instruction
12
Assessment and Instruction: An Interactive Process
12
Educator Access to Student Results
13
14
14
17
18
Online Reporting Portal

Reports That Inform Instruction (and More)
Standard Reports Across the SAT Suite of Assessments
Monitoring and Supporting Student Progress
Khan Academy for SAT Practice
19
Monitoring and Adjusting Curriculum and Instruction
20
Monitoring Assessment Trends for School Improvement
23
APPENDIX:
23
Standard Reports Explained
24
Student Report (PDF Version)
26
Student Score Report
28
Score Roster Report
30
Scores by Institution Report
32
Instructional Planning Report
34
Question Analysis Report
36
Scores by Demographics Report
38
Benchmark by Institution Report
40
Benchmark by Demographics Report
SECTION 1:
A Comprehensive Assessment
System
Overview
Use this guide to become acquainted with the scores and
reporting in the SAT Suite of Assessments and to understand
the information provided in the scores and reporting that you
can use to monitor student progress, review your curriculum
and instruction, and monitor assessment trends for school
improvement planning.
The SAT Suite of Assessments
The College Board is launching the SAT Suite of Assessments,

a system of new and redesigned assessments, in fall 2015 and
spring 2016. The SAT Suite focuses on the few, durable topics that
evidence shows matter most for college and career success. The
assessments in the SAT Suite include:
The redesigned SAT Offered throughout the school year, the
SAT provides a powerful connection to college. Most students
take the SAT for the first time during the spring of their junior
year and a second time during the fall of their senior year. Some
students access the SAT through the SAT School Day program.
The redesigned PSAT/NMSQT and the new PSAT 10 Both
assessments cover the same content at the same level of difficulty
and serve as a check-in on student progress, pinpointing areas for
development. Students will take the PSAT/NMSQT in the fall of
10th and 11th grades. Instead of delivering the PSAT/NMSQT to
10th-grade students in the fall, some schools may instead deliver
the PSAT 10 in the spring.
The PSAT 8/9 This test is the entry point to the SAT Suite
of Assessments, establishing a baseline for college and career
readiness as students enter high school. The PSAT 8/9 is designed
for eighth- and ninth-grade students. Because it is offered in the
fall and spring, schools and districts can choose a test date in
either the fall or spring window.
T H E S AT S U I T E O F A S S E S S M E N T S :
8
Grade
Fall
PSAT 8/9
Spring
PSAT 8/9
U S I N G S C O R E S A N D R E P O RT I N G TO I N F O R M I N ST R U C T I O N
A Comprehensive Assessment System
Grade
Fall
Spring
Grade
Fall
10
Spring
Grade
Fall
11
Spring
PSAT/NMSQT
PSAT 10
PSAT/NMSQT
SAT/SAT School Day
Focused Assessments
Enabling students to concentrate on
what matters most in classroom work.
Career
Opportunity
Personalized
Practice
Opening futures by
providing the skills
and planning tools
students need.
Strengthening
student
achievement
with free,
focused support.
College Opportunity
Removing barriers to applying
and paying for college.
The SAT Suite is one component (Focused Assessments) of the

College Board Readiness and Success System, which features:
Focused, clear, and useful assessments that reflect the knowledge

and skills that current research shows are essential for college
and career readiness and success.
Free, personalized, focused practice resources for all students.
College opportunities through scholarships, fee waivers, and
AP credit.
Powerful career-planning partnerships and a focus on coding
and STEM.
7
All of the assessments included in the SAT Suite of Assessments are

connected by the same underlying content continuum of knowledge
and skills. As students progress from grade to grade, the tests will
keep pace, matching the scope and difficulty of work found in the
classroom. The assessments have been designed to connect directly to
instructional concepts in the classroom and daily practice, and this
guide and related resources provide support as you engage in
instructional alignment and planning. The SAT Suite can help:
Measure student readiness for college and career beginning in

eighth grade.
Monitor student progress and growth over time in grades 812.
Vertically align curriculum.
Identify areas of strength and areas for focus in curriculum

and instruction.
Develop cross-subject tasks and assignments.

Focus interventions for students who need to work on skills.
Scores Across the SAT Suite of Assessments

Consistent Information Reported Across Assessments
The SAT Suite of Assessments will provide detailed information about
student learning by reporting insightful scores in detailed reports. Each
of the redesigned assessments will report a total score, section scores,
test scores, cross-test scores, and subscores on common score scales.
In addition, the SAT reports a separate SAT Essay score for those who
choose to participate in the SAT Essay.
1 Total Score
Total Score
4001600 Scale
Evidence-Based Reading and Writing
Math
2 Section Scores
200800 Scale
2 Cross-Test Scores*
Analysis in Science
1040 Scale
Analysis in History/Social Studies
Reading
3 Test Scores
Writing and Language
Math
Words in Context
Heart of Algebra
Command of Evidence
Problem Solving and

Data Analysis
Expression of Ideas
Passport to Advanced
Mathematics
Standard English
Conventions
1040 Scale
7 Subscores*
115 Scale
*All Cross-Test Scores and Subscores are subject to research.
The graphic above shows score ranges for SAT. PSAT-related assessments have
slightly different score ranges.
All assessments in the SAT

Suite focus on the same
domain of knowledge, skills,
and understandings at a level
of complexity appropriate for
each grade, allowing students
and educators to pinpoint areas
of focus, design strategies for
practice, and measure progress
as they work toward college and
career readiness.
Test Scores. The assessments in the SAT Suite will report three test
scores: Reading, Writing and Language, and Math. Each has a score
range of 1040.
Cross-Test Scores. The assessments will each report two cross-test
scores: Analysis in History/Social Studies and Analysis in Science.
These scores are generated from questions in the Reading, Writing and
Language, and Math Tests that ask students to think analytically about
texts, graphics, and problems in these subject areas. Each of these
scores is reported on a scale from 10 to 40.
Total Score and Section Scores. The assessments in the SAT Suite will
each report a total score on a scale from 400 to 1600 that is the sum of
two section scores: Evidence-Based Reading and Writing (200800) and
Math (200800).
Scores on the optional essay

component of the SAT will be
reported separately and will be
divided into three dimensions:
Reading, Analysis, and Writing.
Each dimension will be scored
on a 28 point scale.
*There is no essay on
PSAT/NMSQT,
PSAT 10, or PSAT 8/9.
Subscores. The assessments will report multiple subscores for

Reading, Writing and Language, and Math, each with a score range of
1 to 15 points. Subscores provide detail about student performance.
The Reading Test and Writing and Language Test will report
two subscores:
Words in Context
Command of Evidence
In addition to the two subscores above, the Writing and Language
Test will report two additional subscores:
Expression of Ideas
Standard English Conventions
The Math Test will report three subscores:1
Heart of Algebra
Problem Solving and Data Analysis
Passport to Advanced Math
Beyond the scores, teachers and students will have access to cohesive
information about test performance. A combination of numerical and
content-based interpretations will provide a better picture of what
students know and can do and will help identify areas where they may
need to focus.
For example, a students numerical test scores will be interpreted in a
content-based explanation that describes the knowledge, skills, and
understandings students have learned and those they need to continue
to practice. Providing both numerical and content-based interpretations
of student performance not only better defines what students know
and can do, it also helps students and teachers identify the knowledge,
skills, and understandings students can focus on next to increase their
college and career readiness.
1. Students will be assessed on Additional Topics in Math on the SAT, PSAT/NMSQT, and PSAT 10, but no
subscore will be reported. On PSAT 8/9, Additional Topics in Math will not be assessed, and there will be no
subscore for Passport to Advanced Math.
Vertical Score Scale

The scores on the redesigned assessments are intended to give an
enhanced profile of students skills and understandings, while the
common score scale will help educators and students monitor growth
across grades and identify areas in need of improvement.
The scores are vertically scaled, which makes it easy to determine
student growth from one test to another: It's the simple difference
between scores. This allows the assessments to function as a system
in which student performance over time can consistently be measured
against a common metric, demonstrating growth over time for a
student (or in the aggregate). This new level of feedback will help both
students and educators engage in the best possible practice for future
assessments: strong classroom work and instruction.
By design, the assessments are created to cover a slightly different
range of content complexity that increases from PSAT 8/9 to
PSAT 10 and PSAT/NMSQT and then to SAT. This increase in content
complexity also corresponds to an increase in the difficulty level of
each test. The PSAT/NMSQT is more difficult or challenging than the
PSAT 8/9, and the SAT is more difficult than the PSAT/NMSQT.
The minimum and maximum scores vary from assessment to assessment
to show the difference in complexity of knowledge on the different tests.
Theoretically, if a student were to take the PSAT 8/9, PSAT 10, and SAT
on the same day, he or she would score the same on each assessment,
but if the student scored perfectly on all three, he or she would only
score a 720 on PSAT 8/9, compared with an 800 for Math on the SAT. This
is because the difficulty of questions is greater on the SAT.
College and Career Readiness Benchmarks

GRADE 8
GRADE 9
FALL
PSAT 8/9
PSAT 8/9
SPRING
PSAT 8/9
PSAT 8/9
GRADE 10
GRADE 11
PSAT/NMSQT
PSAT 10
GRADE 12
SAT
SAT
SAT (200800)
PSAT 10 & PSAT/NMSQT (160760)
PSAT 8/9 (120720)
120
200
300
400
500
600
700
SAT benchmark*
Grade-level benchmarks* will indicate if

students are making on-target progress
towards the SAT benchmark
10
800
Section scores, test scores, and

cross-test scores are vertically
scaled. Subscores are not
vertically scaled and therefore
cannot be used to measure
growth from assessment to
assessment, but they still
provide useful information
about students knowledge and
skills at the time of testing.
Working together, the tests in the SAT Suite of Assessments provide

college and career readiness benchmarks and consistent feedback for
measuring student progress. Benchmarks indicating college and career
readiness are determined using SAT Suite data and first-year college
performance data. The benchmark score indicates that students who
earn that score or higher have a 75 percent likelihood of earning a C or
better in a first-year, credit-bearing course in the same subject area.
The PSAT 8/9 will provide benchmarks and norms for both eighth and
ninth grades. The PSAT 10 will provide benchmarks and norms for
10th grade. The PSAT/NMSQT will provide benchmarks and norms
for 10th- and 11th-graders. Use benchmark information to identify
and accelerate students who are ahead or behind, and use SAT Suite
of Assessment scores and reports to provide the information and
guidance to do so.
11
SECTION 2:
Using SAT Suite of

Assessments Scores and
Reporting to Inform Instruction
Assessment and Instruction:
An Interactive Process
The SAT Suite of Assessments is designed to align with best
practices in classroom instruction that develop knowledge, skills,
and understandings necessary for college and career readiness. The
SAT Suite is also designed to be an integral part of the instructional
process, providing informative, actionable feedback about student
progress toward meeting college and career standards. The scores and
reporting that the SAT Suite provides, along with resources like this
guide, the redesigned SAT professional development modules, and
Khan Academy practice, are intended to support an assessment and
learning process far more than one-day, isolated test events.
When students receive feedback about their performance on any one of
the assessments in the SAT Suite, they can take responsibility for their
own learning and work on the concepts and skills identified as needing
improvement. Students can set learning goals, as well as reflect on and
monitor their own progress toward meeting college- and career-ready
standards.
When you receive feedback about your students progress, you have
the opportunity to support students as they work to own their learning
and develop knowledge and skills they will use throughout their lives.
The scores and reports generated from the SAT Suite of Assessments
will provide you with the ability to drill down to the knowledge, skills,
and understandings each student demonstrates as a strength or as an
area for improvement and will help you target intervention strategies
for students who need support.
You can use the feedback about student progress to take a step back
and review patterns of scores for groups of students, determining
whether there are curriculum and instructional needs that should be
addressed. You will also be able to review performance as a school or
district, receiving valuable feedback about student performance as a
whole and within various demographic groups.
Educator Access to Student Results

Building stronger partnerships with classroom teachers to help students
grow and develop is an important objective of the College Board. To
that end, the assessment process will yield in-depth score reports that
connect student results to classroom work. Like the former Summary
of Answers and Skills (SOAS) Report provided for the PSAT/NMSQT,
the reports for the SAT Suite of Assessments will provide
12
The reports students receive will

provide detailed explanations
of students current college
readiness skills, based on test
score band and typical students.
The reports include actionable
steps students can take to
improve on skills required to be
college and career ready. They
will also provide students with
their AP Potential information.
Although the redesigned

assessment scores and reports
are new, you can continue to
access the information you are
accustomed to using, such as:
Question-Level Analysis
(like SOAS)
AP Potential results
College Readiness Benchmarks
Online Reporting Portal

The new educator reporting portal will support effective decision
making with a variety of standard reports that can be configured for
your needs. You or the point person in your school2 will be able to log in
to the portal to view score reports for the whole school. The portal will
generate score reports based on student demographics, including
means and trends among demographic groups, and this information
can be compared with the performance of students in the district and
at the state level. Content analysis reports (Instructional Planning and
Question Analysis reports) will allow you to drill down to the student
level and analyze the questions students encountered on the actual
assessment, as well as content and skill gaps.
In the online reporting portal, designated users will be able to
analyze score data from every test in the SAT Suite. As each new and
redesigned test rolls out, the reporting portal will grow to include its
reports: A single sign-in will grant access to all score data from the
SAT, SAT Subject Tests, PSAT/NMSQT, PSAT 10, and PSAT 8/9.
In addition to the standard online score reports, portal users will be
able to configure reports with filters, and they will be able to export
information to Excel or a PDF for additional uses. As a portal user,
you can filter by student-provided information, such as race/ethnicity
or highest level of parental education, or you can define your own
comparison groups of your students and organize student performance
records according to your analysis needs. With this capability, you can
configure a report that includes, for example, only the students in your
U.S. History class. This allows you to hone in on your own students
performance and identify skills that are strong and skills that may need
to be an additional focus of instruction in your classroom.
The online reporting system will track students progress for all
assessments they take, allowing you to identify how students are
demonstrating the development of their college and career readiness
skills over time. If a student demonstrated he or she was on track to
meet the college and career readiness benchmark on the
PSAT 8/9 but now has fallen off track to meeting the college and career
readiness benchmark on the PSAT/NMSQT, you may want to work
with the student to determine his or her current needs for building the
knowledge and skills required for college and career success and for
SAT readiness. In addition, if a larger group of students demonstrates
that same lack of year-over-year growth, you can work with teacher
colleagues and administrators to analyze current curriculum and
instructional strategies and look for ways to ensure that students are
engaged in learning activities that build the needed skills.
To support the alignment of curriculum and assessments, the online
portal will include links to your state standards. This resource will
provide teachers and curriculum specialists with additional tools for
analyzing strengths and weaknesses in curriculum and instruction.
Available filters in the online

reporting portal:
Gender (PSAT 8/9, PSAT 10,

PSAT/NMSQT, SAT)
Race/Ethnicity (PSAT 8/9,
PSAT 10, PSAT/NMSQT, SAT)
Completing Core Curriculum
(PSAT 8/9, PSAT 10,
PSAT/NMSQT, SAT)
Highest Level of Parental
Education (PSAT 10,
PSAT/NMSQT, SAT)
Testing Accommodations
(Standard and SSD, StateApproved Accommodations)
(PSAT 10, PSAT/NMSQT,
SAT in locations where they
are offering State-Approved
Accommodations )
Student Search Service
(opted in or not) (PSAT 10,
PSAT/NMSQT, SAT)
Parental Income (SAT)
Fee Waiver Used (SAT)
You will see additional

enhancements to these online
score reports in the future. The
College Board is conducting
research studies to provide
students and teachers with
reliable recommendations
to improve performance
and increase college and
career readiness. These
recommendations will increase
over time as more and more
students take the redesigned
SAT and demonstrate success.
2. Each school will designate a super-user, who will arrange for access to reports for specified school staff
members.
13
Using SAT Suite of Assessments Scores and Reporting to Inform Instruction
question-level analysis, AP Potential information, benchmarks, and

consistent feedback to help teachers encourage and accelerate students.
Reports That Inform Instruction (and More)

The online reporting portal provides several data points that will
help teachers pinpoint what students need, both individually and in
groups, for additional support to become college and career ready. See
the Appendix for detailed annotations of some of the various reports
available in the online reporting portal.
The following standard reports will be available in the online portal.
STANDARD REPORTS ACROSS THE SAT SUITE OF ASSESSMENTS

Report Name
Description
Use these reports to:
Student Intervention
Student Score
Report 3
Provides a view into all SAT Suite

assessments taken by each student.
Shows most current AP Potential
information.
Shows projection of next years scores.
Links to the PDF version of paper student
score reports.
In the future, will show each student's
progress over time against the benchmarks.
Use projection information to

categorize students based on the
likelihood of meeting the benchmark.
For those who are not on track
to meet college and career
benchmarks, develop an
acceleration plan.
For students who are close to
meeting the benchmark, click
through to the Student PDF Report
to identify particular areas to
practice.
For students who have met or
exceeded the benchmark:
Ensure that these students are
taking challenging courses,
including Advanced Placement.
Provide challenging assignments

that will help them expand on
their knowledge and skills.
Score Roster
Report
Provides a roster (list) of all student scores

across all grades for each assessment
administered.
Filter the scores you want to review and
to configure the report to display the data
most important to you.
Not available for district- or state-level data.
Create intervention strategies for

individual students or groups using
the college and career readiness
benchmarks.
Differentiate between students who
scored significantly lower than the
benchmark and those who were
close to meeting the benchmark.
Design activities, assignments, and
formative assessments that will
develop knowledge and skills for
individuals or groups.
3. A student score report is provided in the online portal. In addition, students will receive a paper score report.
14
Report Name
Description
Curriculum and Instruction

Scores by
Institution
Report4
Instructional
Planning Report
Question
Analysis Report5
Provides aggregate scores for your

school as well as scores for all students
in your school for each assessment, test
administration or cohort, and grade.
Provides district and state aggregate
comparison information:
District view lists aggregate
performance for all schools in the
district.
State view lists aggregate performance

for all districts in the state.
Provides aggregate and student-level

performance in three performance groups
related to the benchmarks:
Need to Strengthen Skills
Approaching Benchmark
Meets or Exceeds Benchmark
Includes the state standards that map to
the subscores.
Student-level performance is not available
in district or state views.
Provides aggregate question performance

for your school as well as student-level
question performance for all students
in your school for each assessment,
administration, and grade.
Compares your students aggregate
performance on a given question to the
performance of all students in the district,
state, and nation.
Provides question content and answer
explanations for disclosed forms.
Individual student performance is not
available in district or state views.
Create groups of students for review

and comparison that will allow you to
compare performance across a variety
of factors that are interesting to you:
By course section
By students who have taken a
prerequisite course
By students who have similar
course schedules
Although these comparisons do not
lead to research-based conclusions,
they may initiate deeper investigation
and lead to helpful suggestions or
pitfalls to avoid.
After selecting to review cross-test
scores and subscores, drill through to
the Question Analysis Report to identify
questions linked to the cross-test scores
and subscores.
Look for connections among questions
and scores to identify areas of focus for
intervention and curriculum review.
Remember to include opportunities for
skill reinforcement in science and social
studies courses. Teachers in these content
areas can review lessons and activities to
ensure that students have the opportunity
to practice analysis skills in these courses.
Use difficulty indicators to determine
the level of question with which
students are struggling.
If students are struggling with all
types of questions, this may indicate
that students are not exposed to this
content in class, and a curriculum
review may be helpful.
If students are struggling with
hard questions, collaborate with
other teachers to determine how
to increase the level of difficulty
students practice in classroom
activities and other assessments.
4. Institution refers to schools, districts, and states.

5. Available for disclosed test forms. For nondisclosed test forms (all 2015-16 PSAT 8/9 and March 2016 SAT test forms nondisclosed), the Question Analysis Report
provides only the percentage of students who answered the question correctly. No question information is provided.
15

Report Name
Description
Cohort
Longitudinal
Report6
Provides aggregate performance for

matched cohorts of students taking
more than one redesigned assessment
(e.g., students who took the PSAT/NMSQT
and later took the SAT).
Review how the cohort of students

performed against the benchmarks on
the different SAT Suite assessments.
Determine whether college and
career readiness increased or
decreased over time.
Compare the increase or decrease
with students at the national level.
In content areas where performance
decreased over time, review curriculum
and identify what topics may need to
be updated to improve learning related
to college and career readiness skills.
School Improvement
Scores by
Demographics
Report
Benchmark
by Institution
Report
Provides aggregate scores for demographic

groups of students in your school for each
assessment, administration or cohort, and
grade.
Provides distribution of students in score
bands.
Provides number of students in each
demographic group who participated in
the assessment.
Examine participation rates for all

subgroups:
If you observe patterns of
underrepresentation of groups
of students in your school, work
with counselors and school
administrators to increase
participation.
Develop school improvement
goals focused on increasing
participation to accurately reflect the
demographics in your school.
Provides college and career readiness

benchmark performance for all students
in your school for each assessment,
administration or cohort, and grade.7
Provides district and state aggregate
comparison information:
District view lists aggregate
performance for all schools in the
district.
State view lists aggregate performance

for all districts in the state.
Compare your results (percentage

of students who met both section
benchmarks, or met one of the section
benchmarks) with the state and national
percentages:
If your results are lower, use this
data as a baseline for writing
a school improvement goal to
increase the percentage of students
meeting benchmark in EvidenceBased Reading and Writing and/or
Math, or both.
Develop strategies that will allow
you to realize your goal.
6. This report will be available in the 2016-17 academic year.

7. Only available for intended grades, e.g., PSAT/NMSQT for 10th- and 11th-graders.
16
Report Name
Description
Benchmark by
Demographics
Report
Provides college and career readiness

benchmark performance for demographic
groups in your school for each assessment,
administration or cohort, and grade.8
Allows comparison of up to two
demographic traits.
Review the benchmark performance

for all demographic groups, identifying
groups in which a high percentage of
students met no benchmarks.
Set school improvement goals and
develop strategies to reduce the
percentage of students who are
underperforming. For example, work with
local community-based organizations to
provide support for students leveraging:
Access to practice materials/ Khan
Academy
Homework support
College counseling
Score Trends
by Institution
Report
Provides five-year trends for school/

district/state mean scores and student
participation.
Use trend data to determine past

performance variances from year
to year, and to set attainable goals
for improvement in future student
performance.
Formulate strategies that will result
in improvement, and periodically
monitor whether strategies are
effective.
Score Trends by
Demographics
Report
Provides five-year trends for student

demographic group mean scores and
participation.
Use trend data to determine

demographic group performance from
year to year:
Use this data to set goals for
improvement and to develop
intervention and support strategies,
periodically monitoring strategies
for effectiveness.
Monitoring and Supporting

Student Progress
Each of the reports generated from the SAT Suite of Assessments
provides meaningful information about your students performance on
the assessments, individually and in the aggregate, both at one point
in time and longitudinally. Using information from the reports, you can
better understand specifically where a student stands on the path
to college and career readiness, and you can design appropriate and
targeted intervention strategies for students who need them:
8. Only available for intended grades, e.g., PSAT/NMSQT for 10th- and 11th-graders.
17
Use the Student Score Report to determine the specific knowledge

and skills that students need to master based on test scores,
cross-test scores, and subscores. Develop differentiated classroom
activities and assignments that allow students to practice
the skills identified. Set up after-school study sessions for
individualized support.
Use the Question Analysis Report to create question formats

similar to those used on the SAT Suite of Assessments. Use
the questions in formative and summative assessments. Track
student success with various question formats, and continue to
practice with the formats that cause students to struggle.
Use the Instructional Planning Reports to organize students

into working groups based on similar needs for intervention
and enrichment. Assign groups the activities that allow them to
practice the skills they need.
Use the Instructional Planning Report to organize students into

groups that include students with various performance levels on
a subscore. Require them to discuss questions and activities as
they work through them, allowing the students to think aloud,
understand, and correct errors in understanding or process.
Khan Academy for SAT Practice

When student scores indicate a need for additional practice, you
have substantial resources at your fingertips to help students get the
support they need. The most important practice for the redesigned
SAT will occur in the course of classroom activities. Because of
the alignment among the assessments, the standards, and your
curriculum, you will naturally be designing activities that allow
students to practice in classroom assignments.
To complement classroom activities, the College Board has partnered
with Khan Academy to provide a world-class test-preparation program
that is completely free for all students. On khanacademy.org/sat,
students have access to free resources that support the focused review
of relevant knowledge and skills as well as authentic practice with
College Boardwritten redesigned SAT questions and tests.
Starting with the release of PSAT/NMSQT results at the end of
December, students have the option to link their College Board
and Khan Academy accounts. This allows Khan Academy to create
personalized practice recommendations individually targeted to
address a students greatest opportunities. Free and accessible
anytime, anywhere, Official SAT Practice on khanacademy.org will
give students personalized practice recommendations tailored to
their strengths and weaknesses, based on their actual results and
their progress on diagnostic quizzes in the program. In addition,
your students will find four full-length SAT practice tests from the
College Board as well as thousands of practice questions written
in collaboration with the same developers who are creating the
redesigned SAT.
18
Consider a scenario in which

you review the Score Roster
Report. You notice that one
of your students, Maria, has
earned a score on her Reading
Test that is lower than expected.
Using the online reporting
portal, you are able to review
the Student Score Report and
dig deeper into Marias test
scores, finding that she earned
good scores in one subscore,
Command of Evidence, but
struggled in Words in Context.
You see that she did not
struggle with vocabulary on
pre-redesigned assessments.
This provides a great entry
point to a conversation with
Maria about her understanding
of Words in Context and a topic
to suggest for practice and
review. You can also connect
Maria with other students who
need to practice the same skill
so they can form a study group
and practice together.
On khanacademy.org/sat, all
students have the opportunity
to practice for the redesigned
SAT using Khan Academys
free online tools, including
diagnostic quizzes, full-length
practice tests, interactive
problems, and personalized
practice recommendations.
Students will receive instant
feedback on their answers so
that they can monitor their
progress and make the most of
their study time.
For more information about

practice with Khan Academy,
see khanacademy.org/sat or
sat.org/officialpractice.
Students: Khan Academy can be accessed directly by students,

providing the opportunity for self-paced practice.
Community-based/college-access organizations: Work with

schools or individual students to arrange structured programs for
SAT practice.
Schools: Incorporate SAT practice on Khan Academy into the

school day, either in an activity period or in core academic classes.
Monitoring and Adjusting
Curriculum and Instruction
Each SAT Suite of Assessments report provides information that can

support the development of individual students but also provides
information that will help you align and improve your curriculum and
instruction. In this guide, references to curriculum mean the ways
that educators:
Ensure student learning is aligned to state standards

Deliver content to students over time, through instruction,
Curriculum, as used in this

guide, refers to the knowledge
and skills students are expected
to learn as defined by state
standards; the units and lessons
that teachers teach, including
the assignments given to
students; the materials used in
a course; and the assessments
used to evaluate student
learning.
materials, and assignments
Assess students progress

Assessment is a key component of the curriculum, and results that
reveal student strengths and deficiencies are highly valuable to
educators. When reviewing the performance of groups of students,
educators have the opportunity to use the data to reflect on curriculum
and instruction and determine whether the work done in the
classroom is aligned to college and career readiness. When groups of
students perform well on assessments of specific knowledge, skills,
and understandings, educators can infer that the curriculum and
instruction in these areas are strong. When groups of students struggle
on assessments, it is an indicator that a curriculum review may be in
order.
When you review reports, use a process to evaluate and strengthen
your curriculum:
1. Use the reports to determine areas in which students are meeting
and exceeding college and career benchmarks. Compare areas of

strength to curriculum pacing maps, instructional strategies, and
common assessments.
2. Determine what is helping students to be successful in these
areas. Consider whether time-on-task, spiraled experiences

with content, or familiarity with assessment questions (or any
combination) might contribute to strong student performance.
3. Compare these processes with those in content areas in which
students are less successful as indicated by the reports.
While any one data point at

a given time may not inform
you about curricular strengths
and weaknesses, receiving
consistent information from
multiple measures of student
performance or in trend reports
can provide insight about
strengths and weaknesses in
curriculum and instruction.
For example, if students are
not meeting or exceeding the
benchmark in any particular
section score, the combined
reports in the SAT Suite of
Assessments will provide
rich information to help you
determine areas of focus
to strengthen teaching and
learning.
Do they need more time on task?
19
There are many ways to utilize Official SAT Practice on Khan Academy.
Are they encountering material only once?

Do local common assessments reflect the question structure
and format that will provide practice for the summative
assessment?
4. Work with your colleagues, department, professional learning
community, or vertical team to design common activities,
assignments, and assessments that build skills from year to year
to help students prepare for the assessments over time.
All of the data provided by the SAT Suite of Assessments generates

multiple opportunities to reflect on and assess curriculum and
instruction in each classroom.
Monitoring Assessment Trends
for School Improvement
The SAT Suite of Assessments provides a comprehensive set of reports

that teachers, school administrators, and district administrators
can use to develop systems for monitoring longitudinal progress of
students and student groups and for school improvement planning.
The vertical scaling of the assessments allows educators to track
student progress over time, providing valuable insight about school
improvement needs. The online reporting portal provides trend reports
that indicate the progress of aggregate groups over a five-year time
span. These reports can be disaggregated by school, classroom, and
student demographics. The reports will provide trends in scores and
trends in benchmark achievement.
Examples of School
Improvement SMART Goals:
1.
In the 2014-15 school year,

80 percent of students
participated in SAT. By
2017-18, the participation
rate will increase to
90 percent on SAT, and
participation by subgroups
of students will reflect our
school population.
2.
In the 2015-16 school year,

42 percent of students
met or exceeded the
college and career
readiness benchmark on
the PSAT/NMSQT. By
2018-19, 50 percent
of students will
meet or exceed the
college and career
readiness benchmark.
3.
By the end of the

2018-19 school year,
average student growth
from PSAT 8/9 to PSAT 10
on the Reading Test score
will be at least 10 points.
Data from the SAT Suite of Assessments can be used to set and
monitor school improvement goals. Several data points can be
referenced and tracked to assess progress in school improvement.
Use the Benchmark by Demographics report to monitor

section scores, identifying areas in which students in various
demographic groups meet and do not meet benchmarks.
Use the Instructional Planning reports to monitor cross-test scores

and test scores and develop interim objectives for growth in
content areas, setting specific action plans for improvement on
specific cross-test or test scores.
Use the Scores by Demographics report to monitor student

participation on the SAT Suite of Assessments and to ensure
that all students have access to the assessments. The data
provided by the SAT Suite of Assessments are the most valuable
when they represent the scores of all students in your school.
If the assessment data are not inclusive of all students, they
will not provide a complete picture of your school performance
or improvement.
20
Scores and reports generated from the SAT Suite of Assessments

provide students, teachers, and school and district leaders with
detailed information that can support student academic growth, as
well as improvements in instruction and curriculum. They can be used
to design targeted interventions for students, to inspire instructional
strategies, and to measure the results of school improvement activities.
The College Board will continue to monitor assessment data and
work with educators to develop recommendations for using scores to
improve instruction and support student academic progress.
21
t h e s at s u i t e o f a s s e s s m e n t s
Appendix
APPENDIX
Standard Reports Explained

This appendix is intended to provide a preview of the reports
available in the online reporting portal. All reports are subject to
change. Data in the mock reports in this appendix is fabricated
for the purpose of demonstration; it should not be analyzed or
considered accurate.
Please note that all standard reports in the portal can be
configured by the user. Scores can be selected for review.
Aggregate scores can be filtered to show only certain demographic
groups, or groups can be created and saved based on your
own criteria.
23
T H E S AT S U I T E O F A S S E S S M E N T S
Student Report (PDF Version)
Use this report to identify student scores, strengths, and to find

suggestions for improving skills.
Tips for Using the Report
Meet with students individually
to review scores, strengths, and

opportunities for improvement.
The report includes the NMSC Selection Index, an indicator of

eligibility for the National Merit Scholarship Program.
Review National Merit
All students will receive a paper copy of this report for all
PSAT-related assessments.
Scholarship eligibility.
Go online together to review

areas in which the student
demonstrates likelihood to
succeed in AP.
Additional copies can be obtained through the online Student

Score Report (see Student Score Report in this appendix).
Encourage each student to visit
khanacademy.org/sat to link their

College Board scores with the Khan
Academy practice program to begin
to practice for the SAT.
National
N
Na
aati
tio
tio
on
on
nal
na
al
al M
Merit
Mer
Me
eri
er
erit
itt Sc
S
Scholarship
cch
hola
ho
ollaar
arrsh
sh
ship
hip
ip C
Corporation
Co
orrp
orp
por
po
ora
ora
rat
rati
tio
io
on
on
National Merit Scholarship Corporation (NMSC) conducts the
National Merit Scholarship Program, an academic
competition for recognition and college scholarships. To
designate students who qualify for recognition in its 2017
competition, NMSC will consider the 2015 PSAT/NMSQT
Selection Index scores of some 1.5 million test-takers (usually
high school juniors) who meet program entry requirements.
For more information, please visit: www.nationalmerit.org.
www.nationalmerit.org.
Your NMSC Selection Index

*
Entry Requirements
(Information
provided on your
your answer
answer sheet)
sheet)
(Information you provided
124
4
High school student:

student:
Index based on PSAT/NMSQT

NMSC uses a Selection
Se l ec ti on Index
PSAT/ NMSQT
initi al sc
reen o
tudent s who en
ter iits
ts
scores
screen
off sstudents
enter
sco res as an initial
tion Index,
schola r ship programs. To calculate your Selec
scholarship
Selection
double
Writing
iting and
doub l e the sum of
of of
of your
you r Reading,
Reading, Wr
Language, and Math
Ma th Test
Tes t scores.
sco res .
YES
Report Features
Year
complete
Year to
high school
school and enroll
enroll full-time
to comp
lete high
full-time
in college
college::
2018
If any of
of your
your responses
NMSCs Entry
Requirements
responses to
to NMSCs
Entr y Requ
irements
ques
ght-hand co
he re
questions
right-hand
column)
are
inaccurate
orr tthere
tions (see ri
lumn) a
re inaccu
r a te o
has been a change in
plans
thatt may a
affect
program
entry,
in p
lans tha
ffect p
rogram en
tr y,
wr
write
immediately
to::
ite immed
iately to
Eligibility Information
Year s to be spent in g
Years
grades
912:
rades 9
12:
*The as
asterisk
te ri sk (*) next
nex t to
to your
you r Se
Selection
l ec ti on Index means you
do no
nott meet entry requirements for the 2017 Nationa
Nationall
Me ri t Scholarship
Scho l a r ship P
r og r am. See your responses
responses tto
o
Merit
Program.
o the rright.
ight.
entry requirements tto
National Merit Scholarship Corporation

Attn: Scholarship Administration
1560 Sherman Avenue, Suite 200
Evanston, IL 60201-4897
NOTE:
Students
high
schooll and en
entering
NOTE: S
tudent s leaving
leaving h
i gh schoo
ter ing
college
orr llater
co ll ege in 2018 o
ater must
mus t ttake
ake the PSAT/NMSQT
PSAT/ NMSQT
again
aga in in their
the i r 3 rd year
yea r (junior
yea r ) of
of grades 912
9 12 to
(juni or year)
to
en
Nati onal Merit Scholarship
Schola r ship Program.
Program.
te r the National
enter
Include
yourr name and home add
address
along
with
yourr h
high
Include you
ress a
long w
ith you
igh
schoo
schooll name, address
address,, and ssix-digit
number.
ix- digit code numbe
r.
The Student Report provides all

score information. Students will
be informed about their progress
toward meeting college and career
readiness benchmarks in each
section.They will also get their
percentile information.
Score range color legend:
4
U.S. Citizenship:
Citizenship:
U.S.
l awfu l permanent resident
NO, but I am a U.S.
U. S . lawful
res i dent
(or have app
li ed for permanent res
i dence, the
t he
(or
applied
residence,
application ffor
or which has not been denied)
t he
and I intend tto
o become a U.S.
U. S . citizen
cit izen at the
t un ity a
llowed by llaw.
ear li es t oppor
aw.
earliest
opportunity
allowed
Your Scores: Next Steps

Your score indicates that you are
already likely able to:
Reading Test
18
Retain or add information

information or ideas to a piece of
of a
text to support claims
claims or points
points iin
n somewhat challenging
challenging text
Improve your skills by focusing on:

Retain or add information
information or ideas to a piece of text to support
claims or points
claims
points iin
n challenging text
Revise
Rev
ise text as needed to iimprove
mprove the exactness or content
appropriateness of
of word choices within somewhat challenging texts
Use a variety of
of sentence structures to accomplish a rhetorical
purpose such as persuading an audience
8 to 38
Revise somewhat challenging text to ensure that information
information is
presented iin
n the most llogical
ogical order
Revise
Rev
ise text as needed to iimprove
mprove the exactness or content
appropriateness of word choices within challenging texts
Writing and Language Test

challengDraw reasonable inferences and logical conclusions from challeng
ing texts
Draw reasonable conclusions from somewhat challenging texts

Describe the overall structure of a somewhat challenging text
Identify claims and counterclaims explicitly stated in a somewhat
challenging passage
20
8 to 38
Analyze information presented quantitatively in such forms as

graphs, tables, and charts and relate that information to information
presented in somewhat challenging text
Determine how the selection of specific words shapes meaning and
tone in a challenging passage
Math Test
Interpret a linear inequality in one variable with rational coefficients
that represents a context. Select the equation of a line of best fit and
interpret the slope and intercept of the line in the context of the
situation (when a linear model is appropriate)
Interpret sample statistics understanding and using margin of error
Solve and interpret a quadratic function or equation that represents
a context and requires multiple steps
Calculate and interpret frequency distributions using tables and
other representational methods
Determine how a graph may be affected by a change to its equation
24.0
8 to 38
Determine the value of a constant or coefficient for an equation with

no solution or infinitely many solutions
Using a specified model, make a prediction and compare the
predicted values with the actual values in the data set
Within a context, compare the center of two separate data sets with
different spreads
Determine whether two events are independent given their
probabilities
Get more next steps online

studentscores.collegeboard.org
SAT Practice
AP and Course Work
Register for the SAT
Connect to FREE, world-class SAT

practice online on khanacademy.org/sat
See which AP courses may be a

good match for you
Select an SAT test date and

register for it now
Student Report PDF (Inside right)
24
Red: Need to Strengthen Skills.

Yellow: Approaching Benchmark
Green: Meets or Exceeds
Benchmark
Appendix
Your Evidence-Based
Reading and Writing Score
Your Total Score
860
380 |
160 to
760
Your Nationally
Representative
18th
Sample
Percentile
160
Your Math Score
Your Nationally
Representative
760
Your scores indicate you are close

to being on track for college
readiness, but you need to continue
to strengthen your skills.
Lets get you back on track, so you
wont have to take noncredit courses
in college. You have free, personal
ized recommendations waiting for you
on khanacademy.org/sat
28th
320 to
1520
480 |
Sample
Percentile
Keep in mind,
the PSAT/NMSQT
and SAT are on
the same scale.
Your Nationally
Representative
47th
160 to
760
Sample
Percentile
160
760
You are on track for college

readiness.
Stay on track and continue your
progress. Start now with your free,
personalized recommendations waiting
for you on khanacademy.org/sat
Your score shows you how you would have

scored that day on the SAT.1 How well you
do depends on what you do next!
The College and Career Readiness Benchmark

Reaching your grade-level Benchmark means that you are likely on track to be ready to succeed in select first-year, credit-bearing college courses
Need to strengthen skills
Meets or exceeds Benchmark
*The red, yellow, and green ranges in the test scores and subscores reflect your areas of strengths and weaknesses compared to the typical performance of students in your grade
Test Scores 8 to 38 range*
Subscores
18 Reading
6 Command of Evidence
38
38
38
20 Writing and Language
15
7 Words in Context
15
6 Expression of Ideas
24.0 Math
8
1 to 15 range*
23
15
8 Standard English Conventions
38
Cross-Test Scores
15
8 to 38 range
19 Analysis in History/Social Studies

18 Analysis in Science
9 Heart of Algebra
1
15
8 Problem Solving and Data Analysis

1
When you take tests more than once, your scores may differ slightly upon each testing
occasion. This expected variation is considered your score range, and reflects the range
your scores will likely fall in upon retesting. For the PSAT/NMSQT, these ranges are
approximately:
Total: Your score 40 points.
Section: Your score 30 points.
Test Scores and Cross-Test Scores: Your score 3 points.
Subscores: Your score 2 points.
15
7 Passport to Advanced Math

1
15
10
11
12 13
14 15
Remember that you will receive scores in the same areas when you take the SAT.
1. Beginning in March 2016
Ima B. Student
John F. Kennedy High School, 123456, 2015, Grade 10, I.D. #24068907
Student Report PDF (Inside left)
25
Provides a view into all SAT Suite assessments taken by

each student.
Shows most current AP Potential information.
Use projection information to

categorize students based on
the likelihood of meeting the
benchmark.
Show projection of next years scores.
For those who need to strengthen
Links to the PDF version of student paper score report.

In the future, will show each students progress over time
against the benchmarks.
Assessment Reporting
Reports Center
For students who are close to
meeting the benchmark, click

through to the Student PDF Report
to identify particular areas to
practice.
John Smith
?
Download Center
HELP
New York City Department of Education / Fordham High School for the Arts
Reports
their skills to meet college and

career benchmarks, develop an
acceleration plan.
List: All Students (182)
SEARCH
For students who have met or

exceeded the benchmark:
Report Updated Dec. 5, 2015
Dupuy, Maxine A. Student ID 000123456

GRADE:
CLASS OF:
SEX:
Female
2019
AP Potential
For 9th graders, AP Potential is

predicted for 2 courses
RACE & ETHNICITY:
CORE CURRICULUM:
Hispanic/Latino
HAS AP POTENTIAL
HAS SOME AP POTENTIAL
World History
European History
Bachelors Degree
Provide challenging assignments
PSAT 10 or PSAT/NMSQT, Grade 10

Projected Range for Next Year
720
760
Benchmark
390
PSAT 8/8, Grade 9

Fall 2016 Score
Projected Score
410
PSAT 8/9 Fall 2015
460
900
Score Range: 860-940
Benchmark
458 to 567
470
Legend
Evidence-based Reading
and Writing Score (120-720)
410
Math Score (120-720)
490
Link to the AP Potential Tool to

discover the courses in which a
student demonstrates likelihood to
succeed in AP.
Use this link to download a PDF

copy of the Student Report.
160
120
Report Details
26
Projected Score
| Fordham High School for the Arts 12345678 | GRADE 9
Total Score (240-1440)
Report Features
760
Benchmark
490
Benchmark
160
120

720
Score
385 to 484
that will help them expand on

their knowledge and skills.
Math Score
PSAT 8/9, Grade 9

Fall 2016 Score
Score
taking challenging courses,

including Advanced Placement.
HIGHEST LEVEL PARENTAL EDUCATION:
Evidence-Based Reading & Writing Score
410
Ensure that these students are
Legend
Download Student PDF report
Reports Center
John Smith
?
Download Center
HELP
Reports
Appendix
SEARCH
Report Updated Dec. 5, 2015
Dupuy, Maxine A. Student ID 000123456

GRADE:
CLASS OF:
SEX:
Female
2019
AP Potential
For 9th graders, AP Potential is

predicted for 2 courses
Legend
RACE & ETHNICITY:
CORE CURRICULUM:
HIGHEST LEVEL PARENTAL EDUCATION:
Hispanic/Latino
HAS AP POTENTIAL
HAS SOME AP POTENTIAL
World History
European History
Bachelors Degree
Evidence-Based Reading & Writing Score
Math Score
PSAT 8/9, Grade 9

Fall 2016 Score

PSAT 8/8, Grade 9

Fall 2016 Score

720
760
720
760
Score
Benchmark
390
410
Score
Projected Score
385 to 484
410
160
120
PSAT 8/9 Fall 2015
Benchmark
490
Benchmark
460
Projected Score
Benchmark
458 to 567
470
160
120
Legend
| Fordham High School for the Arts 12345678 | GRADE 9
900
and Writing Score (120-720)
410
Math Score (120-720)
490
Report Details
Download Student PDF report
27
Score Roster Report
Provides a roster (list) of all student scores across all grades for
each assessment administered.
Filter the scores you want to review and to configure the report
to display the data most important to you.
Not available in state-level or district-level data.

Reports Center
Reports
Create intervention for individual
students or groups using the college

and career readiness benchmarks.
Differentiate between students
who scored significantly lower

than the benchmark and those
who were close to meeting the
benchmark.
John Smith
?
Download Center
HELP
Design activities, assignments, and

formative assessments that will
develop knowledge and skills for
individuals or groups.
SEARCH
Back to Summary
Report Updated Dec. 5, 2015 | 25200 Test Takers
PSAT 8/9 Spring 2016 Roster Report Details
This School's AP Potential Tool Access Code: XXXX
Roster Report Filters
Student Name / Student ID
Create PDF from Selected
Use filters to see only some

students, such as Hispanic females.
Filters offer several groups from
which you can select (see page 11
for a list of preset filters).
Use this feature to export scores to

your data system.
Print duplicate copies of the student

paper reports or score labels.
Customize your report by selecting

the scores and data you would like
to review. All scores can be added to
this report as desired.
+/- Customize This Table
Grade
Access
Code
Total
Score
ERW
Math
Met ERW
Benchmark
Met Math
Benchmark
Antun, Katlyn R.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1298
540
743
Baldree, Sammie B.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1098
410
621
Ball, Jake D.
000123456
7th
N39484512Y
987
563
367
N/A
N/A
Carollo, Allyson G.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1104
343
346
Ciccone, Leonie A.
000123456
7th
N39484512Y
1002
320
348
N/A
N/A
Collard, Sonya D.
000123456
9th
N39484512Y
1098
330
333
Costanzo, Audrea T.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
987
345
348
Depp, Marie R.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1104
350
353
Devi, Tanvi G.
000123456
9th
N39484512Y
1230
345
348
Duke, Clifton E.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1098
342
345
Dupuy, Maxine A.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
987
340
343
Erbe, Madlyn R.
000123456
9th
N39484512Y
1104
355
358
Farless, Zenaida R.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1210
345
348
Gavin, Montas
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1098
343
346
Giraud, Melani A.
000123456
9th
N39484512Y
987
342
345
Hambly, Tamekia A.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1104
330
333
Hartgrove, Treasa P.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1298
345
348
Hecht, Jed Y.
000123456
9th
N39484512Y
1098
330
333
Score Roster Report
Report Features
EXPORT
Student
ID
Student Name
All
28
AP Potential Tool
Reports
Appendix
Reports Center
John Smith
?
Download Center
HELP
SEARCH
Back to Summary
PSAT 8/9 Spring 2016 Roster Report Details
Student Name
12 Students selected
All to create for them?
What would like
ate PDF
Create PDF from Selected
Student
Grade
Access
12
ID Students selected
Code
What would like to create for them?
Student Score Labels
Score Reports
Score Reports
EXPORT
Total
Score
ERW
Math
Met ERW
Benchmark
Met Math
Benchmark
Antun, Katlyn R.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1298
540
743
Baldree, Sammie B.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1098
410
621
Ball, Jake D.
000123456
7th
N39484512Y
987
563
367
N/A
N/A
Carollo, Allyson G.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1104
343
346
Ciccone, Leonie A.
000123456
7th
N39484512Y
1002
320
348
N/A
N/A
Collard, Sonya D.
000123456
9th
N39484512Y
1098
330
333
Costanzo, Audrea T.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
987
345
348
Depp, Marie R.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1104
350
353
N39484512Y
1230
345
348
Create PDF
Please make a selection
Check All
AP Potential Tool
Student Score Labels
Cancel
This School's AP Potential Tool Access Code: XXXX
Roster Report Filters
Student
/ Student ID
Create PDF
fromName
Selected
bels
Please close
from the list.
Selected
te for them?
Clear All Devi,

Restore
TanvitoG.default
Cancel
Create PDF
Cancel
Apply
000123456
9th
Duke, Clifton E.
Registration Info
000123456
Scores
8th
N39484512Y
1098
342
345
Sex
Dupuy, Maxine A.
Test Date
000123456 Total & Section

8th Scores N39484512Y
987
340
343
Race / Ethnicity
Access
Erbe, Madlyn
R. Code
Scores
000123456 Test & Cross-test
9th
N39484512Y
1104
355
358
Center
Farless,Test
Zenaida
R.
Subscores
000123456
8th
Benchmarks
N39484512Y
1210
345
348
000123456 Percentiles8th
details
N39484512Y
1098
343
346
Giraud, Melani A.
000123456 National Merit

9th Details N39484512Y
987
342
345
Hambly, Tamekia A.
AP Potential
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1104
330
333
Hartgrove, Treasa P.
000123456
8th
N39484512Y
1298
345
348
Hecht, Jed Y.
000123456
9th
N39484512Y
1098
330
333
Basic Student info
Date of Birth
Grade
Test Center Name

Gavin, Montas
Test Center City
2
4
Score Roster Report
29
Provides aggregate scores for your school, and scores for all
students in your school for each assessment, administration or
cohort, and grade.
Create tailored groups of students
Provides district and state aggregate comparison information.
Compare performance across
for review and comparison.
a variety of factors that are

interesting to you:
District view lists aggregate performance for all schools in

the district.
By course section
State view lists aggregate performance for all districts

in the state.
Reports Center
By students who have similar

course schedules
Although these comparisons
John Smith
?
Download Center
do not lead to research-based

conclusions, they may initiate
deeper investigation and lead to
helpful suggestions or pitfalls
to avoid.
HELP
Reports
By students who have taken a

prerequisite course
SEARCH
(Report Updated Dec. 5, 2016)
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016,11th Grade - Scores by Institution

Filters
School
EXPORT
District
Mean Score
1345
State
Mean Score
1220
portion of students are not

meeting benchmark in EvidenceBased Reading and Writing
or Math.
National Tested
Mean Score
Mean Score
1220
Standard Deviation (SD) = 44
Review the Met Benchmark Columns.

Determine whether a significant
1220
Working in vertical teams, review
More
Student
Antun, Katlyn R.
34578321
Total Score
320 - 1520
Score
Range
1267
Baldree, Sammie B.
34578321
981
Antun, Katlyn R.
34578321
1267
Baldree, Sammie B.
34578321
981
Antun, Katlyn R.
34578321
1267
Baldree, Sammie B.
34578321
981
Antun, Katlyn R.
34578321
1267

Baldree, Sammie B.
34578321
981
...
30
11
Met ERW
Benchmark
(532)
Met Math
Benchmark
(521)
Nationally
Representative
Sample
Percentile
PSAT/NMSQT &
PSAT 10 User
Percentile National
1227-1307
671
596
73%
81%
941 - 1021
552
! 429
73%
81%
1227-1307
671
596
73%
81%
941 - 1021
552
! 429
73%
81%
1227-1307
671
596
73%
81%
941 - 1021
552
! 429
73%
81%
1227-1307
671
596
73%
81%
941 - 1021
552
! 429
73%
81%
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
curriculum maps and ensure

that activities and assignments
progress from grade to grade
and prepare students to
meet the college and career
readiness benchmarks.
More
Report Features
More
Select the scores you would like to

review: total scores, section scores,
test scores, cross-test scores, or
subscores.
Review your schools average score;

compare to District, State, and
Nation.
Nationally Representative Sample

Percentile is the percentile ranking
for a student if all same gradelevel U.S. students took the test.
User Percentile National is the
percentile ranking if typical same
grade-level U.S. test-takers took the
test.
More
More
More
More
More
More
Appendix
Reports Center
Download Center
HELP
Reports
SEARCH
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016,11th Grade - Scores by Institution
Filters
EXPORT
School
Mean Score
1345
District
State
National Tested
Mean Score
Mean Score
Mean Score
1220
1220
1220
More
Student
Total Score
320 - 1520
Antun, Katlyn R.
34578321
Score
Range
Met ERW
Benchmark
532
(532)
Met Math
Benchmark
(521)
521
Nationally
Representative
Sample
Percentile
PSAT/NMSQT &
PSAT 10 User
Percentile National
73%
81%
1267
1227-1307
671
596
More
Baldree, Sammie B.
34578321
Antun, Katlyn R.
34578321
981
941 - 1021
552
! 429
73%
81%
1227-1307
671
596
73%
81%
More
1267
More
Baldree, Sammie B.
34578321
Antun, Katlyn R.
34578321
981
941 - 1021
552
! 429
73%
81%
1227-1307
671
596
73%
81%
More
1267
More
Baldree, Sammie B.
34578321
K l
981
941 - 1021
552
! 429
73%
81%
More
31
Instructional Planning Report
Provides aggregate and student-level performance in three

performance groups related to the benchmarks:
Compare the percentage of students

in each performance group with the
state and national percentages.

Use this information to identify
areas in which your students

are outperforming their peers,
and those in which they are
underperforming their peers.
Includes the state standards that map to the subscores.

Student-level performance is not available in district or
state views.
Reports Center
Reports
Investigate the causes: Is there

a need to adjust instruction or
curriculum in areas with lower
performance?
John Smith
?
Download Center
HELP
Select cross-test scores and
subscores. Drill through to the

Question Analysis Report to identify
questions linked to cross-test scores
and subscores.
SEARCH
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016, 11th Grade - Instructional Planning Report

Filters
All Score (EWR Related and Math Related)
Section Scores (160 - 760)
523
Mean score

28%
24%
15%
15%
280,000 Test takers
See Students in Each Performance Group
28%
24%
15%
15%
230 Test takers
Remember to include

28%
24%
15%
15%
opportunities for skill

reinforcement in science and
social studies courses. Teachers
in these content areas can
review lessons and activities to
ensure that students have the
opportunity to practice analysis
skills in these courses.
200,000 Test takers
See Question Analysis Report
523
Mean score
Math
School
District
State
National Tested
questions and scores to identify

areas of focus for intervention
and curriculum review.
Legend
Evidence-based Reading & Writing
School
District
State
National Tested
Look for connections among
EXPORT
20%
24%
15%
15%
280,000 Test takers
28%
24%
15%
15%
230 Test takers

58%
24%
15%
15%
200,000 Test takers
Report Features
Test Scores (8 - 38)
Legend
28%
24%
15%
15%
280,000 Test takers
28%
24%
15%
15%
230 Test takers
28%
24%
15%
15%
200,000 Test takers
31
Writing
Mean score
20%
280,000 Test takers
District
24%
Instructional
Planning
Report
State
15%
National Tested 15%
28%
24%
15%
15%
230 Test takers

58%
24%
15%
15%
200,000 Test takers
31
Math
Mean score
32
Use this link to get a list of students

in each performance group.
School
District
State
National Tested
31
School
Use this feature to switch between

viewing graphs or data tables, or to
export the data into a spreadsheet
program such as Excel.
Mean score
Reading
School
District
State
National Tested
20%
24%
15%
15%
280,000 Test takers
Cross Test Scores (8 - 38)
28%
24%
15%
15%
230 Test takers

58%
24%
15%
15%
200,000 Test takers
Reports Center
Reports
Appendix
John Smith
?
Download Center
HELP
SEARCH
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016, 11th Grade - Instructional Planning Report

Filters
All Score (EWR Related and Math Related)
EXPORT
Section Scores (160 - 760)
Legend
523
Evidence-based Reading & Writing
Mean score

School
District
State
National Tested
28%
24%
15%
15%
280,000 Test takers
28%
24%
15%
15%
230 Test takers

28%
24%
15%
15%
523
Mean score
Math
School
District
State
National Tested
200,000 Test takers
20%
24%
15%
15%
280,000 Test takers
28%
24%
15%
15%
230 Test takers

58%
24%
15%
15%
200,000 Test takers
Test Scores (8 - 38)
Legend
31
Mean score
Reading
School
28%
24%
280,000 Test takers
District
State
15%
National Tested 15%
28%
230 Test takers
24%
15%

28%
200,000 Test takers
24%
15%
15%
15%
31
Writing
Mean score
School
20%
InstructionalDistrict
Planning Report
24%
State
15%
National Tested 15%
280,000 Test takers
28%
24%
15%
15%
230 Test takers

58%
200,000 Test takers
24%
15%
15%
33
Math
31
Mean score
Provides aggregate question performance for your school as well as

student-level question performance (like the former PSAT/NMSQT
Summary of Answers and Skills report) for all students in your
school for each assessment, administration, and grade.
Read each question included in the
report by clicking on the numbers in

this column. Consider the structure
of the question, the distractors, and
the assessed knowledge and skills.
Compares your students aggregate performance on a given

question to the performance of all students in the district,
state, and nation.
Diagnose errors in student choices
Provides question content and answer explanations for

disclosed forms.
Review the correct answer for each
Individual student performance is not available in district

or state views.
Reports Center
question and the number of students

who selected the correct answer.
Compare your students
performance with the district, state,

and national performance.
John Smith
If your scores are persistently
Download Center
HELP
Reports
by understanding the distractors as

well as the correct answer.
lower than comparison groups,

it may indicate that curriculum
and instruction are not aligned
with the assessed skill. Review
curriculum materials and student
assignments for alignment.
SEARCH
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016, 11th Grade - Question Analysis Report - Form A

Filters
EXPORT
91 Evidence-based Reading and Writing Questions

Correct Response %
Test
Portion
All
Question
Correct
Answer
All
Percentage Correct by Group
Reset Filters
Student Responses
A%
B%
C%
D%
Difficulty
Level
Related Cross-test scores

and Subscores
Expressions of Ideas
Command of Evidence
See Student
Performance
See Student
Performance
Words in Context
Command of Evidence
See Student
Performance
Command of Evidence
See Student
Performance
Words in Context
Command of Evidence
See Student
Performance
Command of Evidence
See Student
Performance
Words in Context
Command of Evidence
See Student
Performance
Command of Evidence
See Student
Performance
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
22%
24%
15%
17%
22
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Easy
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
22%
24%
14%
17%
22
24
14
17
13
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
13
11
22
16
13
11
22
16
Easy
Words in Context
Command of Evidence
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
27%
24%
15%
17%
27
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Medium
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
22%
24%
15%
17%
22
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Medium
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
27%
24%
15%
17%
27
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Hard
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
22%
24%
15%
17%
22
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Hard
Writing
School
District
State
Nation
27%
24%
15%
17%
27
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Hard
Writing
School
District
State
Nation
22%
24%
15%
17%
22
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Hard
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
Students
Performance
all levels of questions, review

curriculum to ensure students are
exposed to the content in class.
Omit%
34
determine the level of question with

which students are struggling:
Related Cross-test Score or Subscore
Difficulty
All
Use difficulty indicators to
48 Math Questions
17
18
19
hard questions, collaborate with

other teachers to determine how
to increase the level of difficulty
students practice in classroom
activities and other assessments.
Report Features
1
Compare the percentage of students

who select each answer with the
district, state, and nation.
Identify the cross-test scores and

subscores to which each question
contributes.
Click on links in this column to

connect to individual student
performance on any question.
Reports Center
John Smith
?
Download Center
HELP
Reports
Appendix
SEARCH
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016, 11th Grade - Question Analysis Report - Form A

Filters
EXPORT
91 Evidence-based Reading and Writing Questions

Correct Response %
Test
Portion
Related Cross-test Score or Subscore
Difficulty
All
48 Math Questions
All
Question
Correct
Answer
All
Percentage Correct by Group
Reset Filters
1
Student Responses
A%
B%
C%
D%
Difficulty
Level
Related Cross-test scores

and Subscores
Students
Performance
Omit%
Command of Evidence
See Student
Performance
See Student
Performance
Words in Context
Command of Evidence
See Student
Performance
Command of Evidence
See Student
Performance
See Student
Performance
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
22%
24%
15%
17%
22
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Easy
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
22%
24%
14%
17%
22
24
14
17
13
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
13
11
22
16
13
11
22
16
Easy
Words in Context
Command of Evidence
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
27%
24%
15%
17%
27
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Medium
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
22%
24%
15%
17%
22
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Medium
27%
24%
15%
17%
27
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Hard
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
Reading
School
District
State
Nation
22%
24%
15%
17%
22
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Hard
Command of Evidence
See Student
Performance
27%
24%
15%
17%
27
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Hard
Words in Context
See Student
Performance
22%
24%
15%
17%
22
24
15
17
15
11
22
16
43
17
22
24
15
11
22
16
15
11
22
16
Hard
See Student
Performance
Writing
School
District
State
Nation
Writing
School
District
State
Nation
Words in Context
Command of Evidence
Command of Evidence
Command of Evidence
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
35
Provides aggregate scores for demographic groups of students

in your school for each assessment, administration or cohort,
and grade.
Compare average scores for all

students with scores for each
demographic group.
Provides distribution of students in score bands.
Determine whether any subgroups
Provides number of students in each demographic group who

participated in the assessment.
are underperforming.
Use the average score as a
baseline for developing school

improvement goals to raise
scores for these subgroups.
Examine participation rates for

all subgroups.
If you observe patterns of
Reports Center
Download Center
HELP
Reports
underrepresentation of groups
of students in your school,
work with counselors and
school administrators to
increase participation.
John Smith
SEARCH
Develop school improvement
goals focused on increasing

participation to accurately reflect
the demographics in your school.
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016,11th Grade - Scores by Demographic

Filters
School
EXPORT
Distribution of Scores
320580
1345
Mean Score
600780
800980
Report Features
42% Met Both Benchmarks

27% Met ERW (531)
19% Met Math (522)
19% Met None
1000- 1200- 14001180 1380 1520
25200 Test Takers / 25200 Enrolled

78% Participation
Apply 2nd Demographic
Student Reported
Demographic
% of Test
Takers
Mean Total Score

320 - 1520
SD
320580
American Indian or
Alaska Native
2%
Asian
12%
Black or African
American
13%
Hispanic/Latino
5%
Native Hawaiian/Other
Pacific Islander
12%
White
1%
Two or More Races
3%
1267
981
1267
981
1267
981
1267
600780
800980
1000- 1200- 14001180 1380 1520
No Response
2%
981
981
11
12
13
Met Both
ERW & Math
Benchmarks
230,216/
231,011
92%
42%
21
112,310/
112,411
92%
42%
23
230,216/
231,011
92%
42%
21
112,310/
112,411
92%
42%
23
230,216/
231,011
92%
42%
21
112,310/
112,411
92%
42%
23
230,216/
231,011
92%
42%
21
112,310/
112,411
92%
42%
21
112,310/
112,411
92%
42%
36
...
Participation
23
Scores
by Demographics Report
Other
23%
# Of test
takers /
Enrolled
14
15
16
17
18
19
Filter up to two demographic levels.
This column provides at-a-glance

information about the percentage
of students at each performance
level and allows you to compare
group performance.
Reports Center
John Smith
?
Download Center
HELP
Reports
Appendix
SEARCH
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016,11th Grade - Scores by Demographic

Filters
School
EXPORT
320580
1345
Mean Score
600780
800980
42% Met Both Benchmarks

27% Met ERW (531)
19% Met Math (522)
19% Met None
1000- 1200- 14001180 1380 1520
25200 Test Takers / 25200 Enrolled

78% Participation
1
2
Student Reported
Demographic
% of Test
Takers
Mean Total Score

320 - 1520
SD
320580
American Indian or
Alaska Native
2%
Asian
12%
Black or African
American
13%
Hispanic/Latino
5%
Pacific Islander
12%
White
1%
Two or More Races
3%
1267
981
1267
981
1267
981
1267
23%
981
800980
1000- 1200- 14001180 1380 1520
# Of test
takers /
Enrolled
Participation
Met Both
ERW & Math
Benchmarks
23
230,216/
231,011
92%
42%
21
112,310/
112,411
92%
42%
23
230,216/
231,011
92%
42%
21
112,310/
112,411
92%
42%
23
230,216/
231,011
92%
42%
21
112,310/
112,411
92%
42%
23
230,216/
231,011
92%
42%
21
112,310/
112,411
92%
42%

Other
600780
37
No Response
2%
981
21
112,310/
112,411
92%
42%
Benchmark by Institution Report
Provides college and career readiness benchmark performance for

all students in your school for each assessment, administration
or cohort, and grade.
Compare your results (percentage
of students who met both section

benchmarks or met one of the
section benchmarks) with the state
and national percentages:

the district.
If your results are lower, use this

data as a baseline for writing
a school improvement goal
to increase the percentage of
students meeting benchmark
in Evidence-Based Reading and
Writing and/or Math, or both.
State view lists aggregate performance for all districts in

the state.
Reports Center
Reports
John Smith
?
Download Center
Develop strategies that will allow
HELP
you to realize your goal.
SEARCH
Review the students who met, are
approaching, and did not meet

the benchmarks in both Math
and Evidence-Based Reading and
Writing.
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016,11th Grade - Benchmark by Institution

Filters
EXPORT
School
District
Met both benchmarks
45
State
41%
Mean total score = 1023
Met both benchmarks
39%
National Tested
Met both benchmarks
Met both benchmarks
43%
In collaboration with others in your
department, professional learning

community, or vertical team, design
in-class activities or homework
assignments differentiated for
students at each performance level
that will provide needed practice
and accelerate growth.
More
ERW: All Performance
Student
Antun, Katlyn R.
34578321
Baldree, Sammie B.
34578321
Ball, Jake D.
34578321
Carollo, Allyson G.
34578321
Antun, Katlyn R.
34578321
Baldree, Sammie B.
34578321
Total
Score
(320-1520)
Score
Range
1061
10311091
845
800980
931
800980
1089
10311091
1061
10311091
845
800980
Ball, Jake D.
34578321
Math: All Performance
620
38
620
14
15
311
590650
591
13
498
317377
10311091
12
541
16
17
18
19
1
468528
468528
511571
468528
511571
498
561621
Report Features
511571
511571
498
590650
347
11
311
561621
620
...
498
590650
591
800-
1089
541
317377
620
Score
Range
Math Score
(160-760)
590650
347
931 980 Report

Benchmark by Institution
Carollo, Allyson G.
34578321
Score
Range
and Writing Score
(160-760)
Legend
468528
Use these filters to show lists of

students in each performance group.
Reports Center
Reports
Appendix
John Smith
?
Download Center
HELP
SEARCH
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016,11th Grade - Benchmark by Institution

Filters
EXPORT
School
District
Met both benchmarks
45
41%
Antun, Katlyn R.
34578321
Baldree, Sammie B.
34578321
Ball, Jake D.
34578321
Carollo, Allyson G.
34578321
Antun, Katlyn R.
34578321
Baldree, Sammie B.
34578321
Ball, Jake D.
Total
Score
(320-1520)
Score
Range
1061
10311091
845
800980
931
800980
1089
10311091
1061
10311091
845
800980
Benchmark34578321
by Institution Report
Carollo, Allyson G.
34578321
931
800980
1089
10311091
43%
More
Met both benchmarks
National Tested
39%
Student
State
Met both benchmarks
Met both benchmarks
and Writing Score
(160-760)
620
347
Score
Range
Legend
541
590650
498
317377
620
591
620
347
590650
311
541
590650
591
590650
561621
511571
468528
511571
498
561621
498
317377
620
Score
Range
Math Score
(160-760)
311
468528
511571
468528
511571
498
468528
39
Benchmark by Demographics Report
Provides college and career readiness benchmark performance

for demographic groups in your school for each assessment,
administration or cohort, and grade9.
Review the benchmark performance

for all demographic groups,
identifying groups in which a
high percentage of students met
no benchmarks.

the district.
State view lists aggregate performance for all districts in
the state.
Reports Center
Reports
Set school improvement goals and
develop strategies to reduce the

percentage of students who are
underperforming. For example,
work with local community-based
organizations to provide support for
students leveraging:
John Smith
?
Download Center
Access to practice materials/
HELP
Khan Academy
SEARCH
Homework support
College counseling
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016,11th Grade - Benchmark by Demographic

Filters
EXPORT
School
Met both benchmarks
45
Student Reported
Demographic
American Indian or
Alaska Native
Asian
Black or African
American
Hispanic/Latino
Pacific Islander
White
Two or More Races
Evidence-based Reading and

Writing Benchmark (531)
Math Benchmark (531)
47%
37%
16%
45%
25%
20%
SD
Met Both
Benchmarks
1023
23
45%
47%
37%
16%
45%
25%
20%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
42%
43%
37%
20%
42%
35%
23%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
45%
47%
37%
16%
45%
25%
20%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
42%
43%
37%
20%
42%
35%
23%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
45%
47%
37%
16%
45%
25%
20%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
42%
43%
37%
20%
42%
35%
23%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
45%
47%
37%
16%
45%
25%
20%
12%
230,216/
231,011
20%
42%
35%
23%
12%
230,216/
231,011
43%
37%
20%
42%
35%
23%
12%
230,216/
231,011
Evidence-based
Reading and Writing
Benchmark (531)
1023
23
42%
Math
Benchmark
(522)
Met No
Benchmarks
9. Only available for intended grades,

for 17
10th...
11e.g.,
12 PSAT/NMSQT
13
14
15
16
18 and
19 11th-graders.
40
Legend
Mean
Total
Score
(320-1520)
Other
43%
Benchmark
by Demographics
Report
37%
1023
23
42%
No Response
25120 Test Takers /

25120 Enrolled
78% Participation
Number Of test
takers /
Enrolled
Report Features
1
These columns show the percent of

students who met BOTH college and
career readiness benchmarks, and
those who met NO benchmarks.
Identify the number of test-takers

from each demographic group
and compare it with the number of
students enrolled in the school.
Reports Center
Reports
Appendix
John Smith
?
Download Center
HELP
SEARCH
PSAT/NMSQT Fall 2016,11th Grade - Benchmark by Demographic

Filters
EXPORT
School
Met both benchmarks
45
Student Reported
Demographic
Evidence-based Reading and

Writing Benchmark (531)
Math Benchmark (531)
47%
37%
16%
45%
25%
20%
25120 Test Takers /

25120 Enrolled
78% Participation
Mean
Total
Score
(320-1520)
SD
Met Both
Benchmarks
1023
23
45%
47%
37%
16%
45%
25%
20%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
42%
43%
37%
20%
42%
35%
23%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
45%
47%
37%
16%
45%
25%
20%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
42%
43%
37%
20%
42%
35%
23%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
45%
47%
37%
16%
45%
25%
20%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
42%
43%
37%
20%
42%
35%
23%
12%
230,216/
231,011
1023
23
45%
47%
37%
16%
45%
25%
20%
12%
230,216/
231,011
Benchmark
Otherby Demographics Report
1023
23
42%
43%
37%
20%
42%
35%
23%
12%
230,216/
231,011
42%
43%
37%
20%
42%
35%
23%
12%
230,216/
231,011
American Indian or
Alaska Native
Asian
Black or African
American
Hispanic/Latino
Pacific Islander
White
Two or More Races
No Response
1023
23
Evidence-based
Reading and Writing
Benchmark (531)
Math
Benchmark
(522)
Met No
Benchmarks
Legend
Number Of test
takers /
Enrolled
41

Redesigned-Sat-K12-Using-Scores-And-Reporting-To-Inform-Instruction-1 1 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Redesigned-Sat-K12-Using-Scores-And-Reporting-To-Inform-Instruction-1 1 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The SAT Suite of Assessments:

Using Scores and Reporting to

About the College Board

Special thanks to the College Boards K12 Assessment Redesign

Steering Committee for providing feedback on the SAT Suite

scores and reports and other resources for educators. The

K12 Committee was convened in spring 2014 to advise the

College Board on assessment implementation challenges and

opportunities and to advise on the needed tools and resources

most important to K12 educators. Participating districts include:

Bangor School Department, ME

Cincinnati Public Schools, OH

Fort Bend Independent School District, TX

Long Beach Unified School District, CA

Montgomery County Public Schools, MD

Orange County Public Schools, FL

2015 The College Board. College Board, Advanced Placement,

Advanced Placement Program, AP, SAT, Student Search Service,

AP Potential, PSAT, and SAT Subject Tests are trademarks owned

by the College Board. PSAT/NMSQT is a registered trademark of

the College Board and National Merit Scholarship Corporation.

Excel is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation.

Visit the College Board on the Web:

Khan Academy is a registered trademark in the United States and

The Redesigned SAT Teacher Implementation Guide,

Practice opportunities for students through the College

Online professional development modules, webinars, and

Resources for school and district leaders, including links to

A Counselor Implementation Guide that supports the work

about this SAT Suite of Assessments: Using Scores and

Reporting to Inform Instruction guide, please email

Section 1: A Comprehensive Assessment System

The SAT Suite of Assessments

Scores Across the SAT Suite of Assessments

Consistent Information Reported Across Assessments

Vertical Score Scale

College and Career Readiness Benchmarks

Section 2: Using SAT Suite of Assessments Scores and Reporting to

Assessment and Instruction: An Interactive Process

Educator Access to Student Results

Online Reporting Portal

Monitoring and Adjusting Curriculum and Instruction

Monitoring Assessment Trends for School Improvement

Standard Reports Explained

Student Report (PDF Version)

Student Score Report

Score Roster Report

Scores by Institution Report

Instructional Planning Report

Question Analysis Report

Scores by Demographics Report

Benchmark by Institution Report

Benchmark by Demographics Report

The SAT Suite of Assessments

The College Board is launching the SAT Suite of Assessments,

A Comprehensive Assessment System

The SAT Suite is one component (Focused Assessments) of the

Focused, clear, and useful assessments that reflect the knowledge

All of the assessments included in the SAT Suite of Assessments are

Measure student readiness for college and career beginning in

Monitor student progress and growth over time in grades 812.

Vertically align curriculum.