Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This case illustrates a complete capital budgeting analysis, including cash flow analysis
and profitability measures. Note the model extends to Column I.
The model consists of a complete base case analysis—no changes need to be made
to the existing MODEL-GENERATED DATA section. However, all values in the student
version INPUT DATA section have been replaced with zeros. Thus, students must determine
the appropriate input values and enter them into the model. These cells are colored red.
When this is done, any error cells will be corrected and the base case solution will appear.
Note that the student version does not contain any risk analyses, so students will have to
create their own if required by the case. Furthermore, students must create their own
graphics (charts) as needed to present their results.
INPUT DATA:
Page 1
Scenario 1
Cost of capital $$.$%
No of days operation $$$
MODEL-GENERATED DATA:
Depreciation Schedule:
Page 2
Scenario 1
(For payback calculation)
1. What are the NPV, IRR, MIRR, and payback of the proposed ambulatory surgery center? Do the measures ind
NPV $875,020
IRR $$.$%
MIRR $$.$%
Payback $.$
Yes, the proposal should be accepted as the NPV is positive.
2. Inflation is one of the most difficult factors to deal with in project analysis.
(a). Complete the inflation impact table shown in Exhibit 20.2.
3. One board member wants to make sure that a complete risk analysis, including sensitivity and scen
(a). Perform a sensitivity analsysis
Sensitivity 1: Profitability and Breakeven Measures based on Cost of Capital
Cost of Capital 10.00% 4.00% 6.00%
Net present value (NPV) $$$$,$$$
Internal rate of return (IRR) $$.$%
Payback $.$ $.$ $.$
MIRR $$.$% $.$% $$.$%
The proposal will be unaceptable for cost of capital more than 12.9%
Page 3
Scenario 1
Scenario 1. Base Case - Cost of capital 10%, Procedures per day 20, net patient revenue per procedur
NPV $$$$,$$$
IRR $$.$%
MIRR $$.$%
Payback $.$
Scenario 2. Cost of capital 14%, Procedures per day 25, net patient revenue per procedure $1,200 and
NPV $$,$$$,$$$
IRR $$.$%
MIRR $$.$%
Payback $.$
Scenario 3. Cost of capital 12%, Procedures per day 15, net patient revenue per procedure $800 and B
NPV ($$,$$$,$$$)
IRR -$.$%
MIRR $.$%
Payback $$$
4. (c) Why is the expected NPV obtained in the scenario analysis different from the base case NPV?
This is because of change in assumption on procedures per day, cost of capital, net patient revenue per proc
Parameters
Breakeven Values of the Procedures per day
Breakeven Values of the net revenue per procedure
Breakeven Values of the number of days to be operated in the year
6. To help with the risk-incorporation phase of the analysis, Jules consulted with Mark Hauser, the hos
project and how the hospital typically adjusts for risk.
(a) What is the project's differential risk-adjusted NPV?
Page 4
Scenario 1
Cost of Capital Risk Differential
Adjusted NPV
NPV
Base Case - 10% $$$$,$$$
6% $$,$$$,$$$ $$,$$$,$$$
14% ($$$$,$$$) ($$,$$$,$$$)
(b). Assess the corporate risk of the project. (No calculations are required. Think about correlation of
The coefficient of variation reflects the amount of risk taken for every unit of expected return and hence lower
variation of NPV ranges between 1.0 to 2.0, the project seems to be very risky.
7. Jules Bergman is aware that there are some qualitative factors that are relevant to the surgery cent
(a) What qualitative factors might support project acceptance?
Favorable competitive environment will support the assumption considered on procedures per day as well as
(c) Can you think of any costs that might be associated with the project that have not been included in
No. All possible costs have been included. However, one cost that may have been considered is the campaig
this is difficult to assess and build in the model.
(d) Are there any potential benefits that have not been included?
No. All pssoble benefits have been included.
(e) What additional data would you seek from other hospital staff members to conduct a more thoroug
Monthly MIS showing trend of inpatients opting for surgery, actual cost incurred on surgery on a monthly basi
8. Considering all points, would you build the ambulatory surgery center?
It makes sense to build the ambulatory surgery center because it is need of the hour as is seen in the case th
inpatient surgery and hence will have long term impact on Coral Bay Business. Also positive NPV and sensiti
opening the ambulatory surgery center.
9. In your opinion, what are three key learning points from this case?
Project NPV evaluation should consider all necessary variables to evaluate project viability. Discount rate ass
necessary by performing sensitivity and scenario analysis. It is also important to identify the opportunities lost
such loss should also be considered in the evaluation.
Page 5
Scenario 1
Copyright 2014 Health
Administration Press
Management, Strategy,
ion, CAPSIM,
determine
appear.
Page 6
Scenario 1
2 3 4 5
Page 7
Scenario 1
center? Do the measures indicate acceptance or rejection of the proposed ambulatory surgery center?
nue Inflation
4% 5% 6%
on has positive impact. Also it is visible that positive impact of revenue inflation is higher
me for cost and revenue and is increasing at same rate than the NPV is also rising.
then the NPV starts declining.
ding sensitivity and scenario analyses, is performed before the proposal is sent to the board.
st of capital will have no impact on IRR and payback, MIRR will rise and fall with rise and fall of cost of capital respec
Page 8
Scenario 1
ent revenue per procedure $1,000 and Build/equipment salvage value $5,000,000
re is critical and as the no of procedures or net revenue rise or fall the NPV also rises and fall substantially
uncertain?
in order to make project viable. In this case the three KPIs are Procedures per day, Net Revenue per
with Mark Hauser, the hospital’s CFO, about both the risk inherent in the hospital's average
Page 9
Scenario 1
hink about correlation of the surgery center and hospital cash flows.)
ed return and hence lower the ratio less risky is the project. Since in the given case the coefficient of
cedures per day as well as net revenue per procedure and hence will maintain the project viability
evenue per procedure, increase in demand for supplies leading to rise in cost of supplies
ur as is seen in the case that the outpatient surgery number is increasing leading to decline in number of
o positive NPV and sensitivity and scenario analysis further makes the case even stronger to go for
viability. Discount rate assumption should be taken carefully and stress testing of the project is
entify the opportunities lost or foregone in lieu of project under consideration and the economic value of
Page 10
Scenario 1
st of capital respectively
Page 11
Scenario 1
stantially
Page 12
INPUT DATA:
MODEL-GENERATED DATA:
Depreciation Schedule:
NPV $$,$$$,$$$
IRR $$.$%
MIRR $$.$%
Payback $.$
Yes, the proposal should be accepted as the NPV is positive.
2 3 4 5
MODEL-GENERATED DATA:
Depreciation Schedule:
MACRS Deprec.
Year Factor Expense
1 $.$$ $$,$$$,$$$
2 $.$$ $,$$$,$$$
3 $.$$ $,$$$,$$$
4 $.$$ $,$$$,$$$
5 $.$$ $,$$$,$$$
6 $.$$ $$$,$$$
NPV ($$,$$$,$$$)
IRR -$.$%
MIRR $.$%
Payback $$$
Yes, the proposal should be rejected as the NPV is negative.
End of Year
Book value
$$,$$$,$$$
$,$$$,$$$
$,$$$,$$$
$,$$$,$$$
$$$,$$$
$
Cash Flows
1 2 3 4 5