Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TYPE Manual
Field Placement
TOC n/a
Overall Comment: Overall, Mr. Thompson has done well up to this mid-semester
point. He has a strong knowledge of content and is well-prepared. I would like to see
him strengthen his ability to scaffold instruction and sustain student engagement
throughout the lessons. In addition, I think Mr. Thompson should continue to
strengthen his behavior management techniques to meet student challenges. Also, I
feel his lessons would be more successful if he spent more time attending to the
students prior knowledge and building upon what they already know rather than
assuming that they already know.
Assessed Criteria
Criterion
Description
Score (0-4)
Comments
The candidate knows lesson
Mr. Thompson is
PK1
content and procedures prior to
well planned and
4.0
(Professional
lesson implementation and
always has a
Knowledge)
identifies sources for multiple
timeline and frame
and varied perspectives.
set for lessons.
PK2
The candidate connects content
3.5
(Professional
to the real world and to students'
Knowledge)
experiences.
PK3
The candidate identifies
(Professional
essential components of a topic 3.0
Knowledge)
or concept and makes explicit
connections among facts, skills,
and concepts; explicitly
Criterion
PK4
(Professional
Knowledge)
PK5
(Professional
Knowledge)
IP1
(Instructional
Planning)
IP2
(Instructional
Planning)
IP3
(Instructional
Planning)
IP4
(Instructional
Planning)
IP5
(Instructional
Planning)
ID1
(Instructional
Delivery)
Description
Score (0-4)
demonstrates how and when to
use specific knowledge and
skills.
The candidate attends to student
prior knowledge and
2.5
demonstrates and provides
feedback on metacognitive skills.
The candidate effectively
addresses appropriate
curriculum standards.
4.0
Comments
All of Mr.
Thompson's lesson
plans adhere to
state and school
division
expectations.
4.0
3.0
The candidate uses student
learning data to guide planning.
The candidate plans for
differentiated instruction.
3.0
Mr. Thompson
always is well
planned and
follows a strict
time line. In
addition, he
always has
materials readily
available.
Criterion
ID2
(Instructional
Delivery)
ID3
(Instructional
Delivery)
ID4
(Instructional
Delivery)
ID5
(Instructional
Delivery)
ASL1
(Assessment of
and for Student
Learning)
ASL2
(Assessment of
and for Student
Learning)
ASL3
(Assessment of
and for Student
Learning)
ASL4
Description
materials and/or discussions.
The candidate explicitly
integrates new and prior
knowledge and facilitates higher
order thinking.
The candidate demonstrates
effective pacing, clarity of
instructions, learning goals, time
cues, and redirection.
The candidate facilitates and
balances student and teacher
dialogue, including wait-time,
acknowledgement, repetition,
and extension; there is studentinitiated dialogue with peers and
teacher(s).
The candidate differentiates
instruction to meet students'
needs.
The candidate acknowledges
background knowledge (starts
where they are), checks in with
students for content
understanding, notices
difficulties, and flexibly
approaches student learning
challenges.
The candidate asks students to
examine, analyze, and/ or
interpret information, generate
or test hypotheses, and provides
opportunities for student
metacognition, including student
planning, reflection, selfevaluation, and explanation of
their own learning.
The candidate engages in backand-forth exchanges with follow
up questions and builds on
student responses by providing
clarification, expansion, and
specific feedback.
The candidate uses pre-
Score (0-4)
2.5
2.5
3.0
3.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
2.5
Comments
Criterion
(Assessment of
and for Student
Learning)
ASL5
(Assessment of
and for Student
Learning)
LE1 (Learning
Environment)
LE2 (Learning
Environment)
LE3 (Learning
Environment)
LE4 (Learning
Environment)
LE5 (Learning
Environment)
Description
Score (0-4)
assessment data to develop
expectations, differentiate
instruction, and document
learning.
The candidate uses a variety of
assessment strategies/ tools
appropriate and valid for the
3.0
content and student population,
aligned with established
curriculum standards and
benchmarks.
Adults and students: use
respectful language, including
each others names, in a warm,
calm voice, listen to, cooperate
3.0
with, and interact with one
another, share positive affect
(smiling, laughing, enthusiasm)
and social conversations build
productive relationships.
The candidate provides clear,
explicit, and consistent
expectations so students know
what to do, anticipates and
2.5
monitors student behavior using
proximity, and effectively/
efficiently redirects misbehavior
so little time is lost.
Student behavior is compliant/
non-disruptive and non2.5
aggressive and students feel
comfortable taking risks and
seeking guidance and support.
The candidate responds to
academic and social/ emotional
needs and cues, including
2.5
responding to student challenges
by using subtle cues, peer
redirection, and proximity; low
reactivity.
The candidate provides a high
3.0
quality of feedback, as
evidenced by scaffolding
Comments
Criterion
Description
Score (0-4)
techniques such as hints, timely
assistance, and encouraging
persistence, as well as
recognition and affirmation of
students efforts.
The candidate demonstrates
cultural competency and
LE6 (Learning
3.0
responsiveness to diverse
Environment)
student and family funds of
knowledge.
The candidate collaborates and
PR1
communicates effectively within
3.5
(Professionalism the school community to
)
promote students well-being
and success.
Comments
Mr. Thompson
adheres to all
county and state
policies. He
maintains a
professional
demeanor at all
times.
TYPE Manual
Field Placement
TOC n/a
Overall Comment: Teaching candidate has made excellent progress at this point in
the internship.
Assessed Criteria
Criterion
Description
Score (0-4)
Comments
The candidate knows lesson
PK1
content and procedures prior
3.0
(Professional
to lesson implementation and
Knowledge)
identifies sources for multiple
and varied perspectives.
PK2
The candidate connects
3.0
(Professional
content to the real world and
Knowledge)
to students' experiences.
The candidate identifies
essential components of a
topic or concept and makes
PK3
explicit connections among
3.0
(Professional
facts, skills, and concepts;
Knowledge)
explicitly demonstrates how
and when to use specific
knowledge and skills.
The candidate attends to
PK4
student prior knowledge and
3.0
(Professional
demonstrates and provides
Knowledge)
feedback on metacognitive
skills.
PK5
The candidate effectively
3.0
(Professional
addresses appropriate
Knowledge)
curriculum standards.
IP1
The candidate identifies prior 3.0
(Instructional
knowledge on which learning
Planning)
activities build and determines
Criterion
IP2
(Instructional
Planning)
IP3
(Instructional
Planning)
IP4
(Instructional
Planning)
IP5
(Instructional
Planning)
ID1
(Instructional
Delivery)
ID2
(Instructional
Delivery)
ID3
(Instructional
Delivery)
ID4
(Instructional
Delivery)
ID5
(Instructional
Delivery)
Description
Score (0-4)
Comments
clear learning targets
The candidate develops lesson
and unit plans that make clear
that students will know what
Lesson plans are very
3.5
to do during the lesson, when
detailed and clear to
tasks are completed, as well
follow.
as during efficient / defined
transitions.
The candidate is prepared to
3.5
teach lessons, ensuring that
materials are "ready-to-go."
Evidence of using
The candidate uses student
3.0
pre-assessments to
learning data to guide
group students into
planning.
small groups.
The candidate plans for
differentiated instruction.
The candidate appears
interested in the content and
clearly presents information in
an effective, engaging
manner; students are actively
engaged in materials and/or
discussions.
The candidate explicitly
integrates new and prior
knowledge and facilitates
higher order thinking.
The candidate demonstrates
effective pacing, clarity of
instructions, learning goals,
time cues, and redirection.
The candidate facilitates and
balances student and teacher
dialogue, including wait-time,
acknowledgement, repetition,
and extension; there is
student-initiated dialogue with
peers and teacher(s).
The candidate differentiates
instruction to meet students'
needs.
2.5
3.5
Teacher is very
engaged with the
material. Students
typically are likewise.
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.5
Criterion
Description
Score (0-4)
ASL2
(Assessment of
and for Student
Learning)
ASL3
(Assessment of
and for Student
Learning)
ASL4
(Assessment of
and for Student
Learning)
ASL5
(Assessment of
and for Student
Learning)
LE1 (Learning
Environment)
Comments
During instruction,
teacher responds
flexibly to students'
academic needs. In
small group practice,
he seeks out
struggling students
to give extra
scaffolding.
Uses pre-assessment
data to group
students for small
group instruction.
Teacher candidate
models excellent
interactions with
students during
class.
Criterion
LE2 (Learning
Environment)
LE3 (Learning
Environment)
LE4 (Learning
Environment)
LE5 (Learning
Environment)
LE6 (Learning
Environment)
PR1
(Professionalis
m)
Description
Score (0-4)
Comments
with one another, share
positive affect (smiling,
laughing, enthusiasm) and
social conversations build
productive relationships.
The candidate provides clear,
explicit, and consistent
Has made great
expectations so students know
progress in
what to do, anticipates and
3.0
communicating
monitors student behavior
expectations, using
using proximity, and
proximity control and
effectively/ efficiently redirects
redirecting.
misbehavior so little time is
lost.
Student behavior is compliant/
non-disruptive and non3.0
aggressive and students feel
comfortable taking risks and
seeking guidance and support.
The candidate responds to
academic and social/
emotional needs and cues,
3.0
including responding to
student challenges by using
subtle cues, peer redirection,
and proximity; low reactivity.
The candidate provides a high
quality of feedback, as
evidenced by scaffolding
Does of great job of
techniques such as hints,
providing scaffolding
3.5
timely assistance, and
to individual
encouraging persistence, as
students; affirms
well as recognition and
students' work.
affirmation of students
efforts.
The candidate demonstrates
cultural competency and
3.0
responsiveness to diverse
student and family funds of
knowledge.
The candidate collaborates
3.5
and communicates effectively
within the school community
Criterion
PR2
(Professionalis
m)
PR3
(Professionalis
m)
PR4
(Professionalis
m)
PR5
(Professionalis
m)
Description
Score (0-4)
to promote students wellbeing and success.
The candidate adheres to
federal and state laws, school 3.0
and division policies, and
ethical guidelines.
The candidate sets goals for
improving knowledge and
3.5
skills and seeks out resources
to achieve those goals.
The candidate works in a
collegial and collaborative
manner with administrators,
3.0
school and university
personnel, and the community.
The candidate demonstrates
consistent mastery of
3.5
academic English in all
communication.
Close
TYPE Manual
Field Placement
TOC n/a
Comments
Criterion
Description
Score (0-4)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.0
Comme
nts
Criterion
Description
Score (0-4)
Comme
nts
Criterion
LE2 (Learning
Environment)
LE3 (Learning
Environment)
LE4 (Learning
Environment)
LE5 (Learning
Environment)
LE6 (Learning
Environment)
PR1
(Professionalism)
PR2
(Professionalism)
PR3
(Professionalism)
PR4
(Professionalism)
PR5
Description
Score (0-4)
Comme
nts
Criterion
(Professionalism)
Close
Description
mastery of academic English in all
communication.
Score (0-4)
Comme
nts