You are on page 1of 10
OO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Document Scanning Lead Sheet Jan-29-2016 8:49 am Case Number: CGC-16-550077 Filing Date: Jan-26-2016 3:01 Filed by: ROSSALY DELAVEGA Juke Box: 001 Image: 05248706 COMPLAINT SUSAN BARROWS VS. THOMAS MATERAZZI ET AL 001005248706 Instructions: Please place this sheet on top of the document to be scanned. SUM-100 SUMMONS agree me cncomre (CITACION JUDICIAL) NOTICE TO DEFENDANT: (AVISO AL DEMANDADO): ‘Thomas Materazzi; Uber Technologies, Inc; Rasicr LLC; Rasier-CA LLC; and Does 1-20 ‘YOU ARE BEING SUED BY PLAINTIFF: (LO ESTA DEMANDANDO EL DEMANDANTE): ‘Susan Barrows TRGTIGET Vaca ban ton Ta Ga ay SOG opal yOU WO OW DGG PAT Ws YOU WAN GR i TOT "ou have 20 CALENOAR OAYS afer ie suring papa ae soved oo ou ea en responds a curt and have 3 cy sarve oh pla Aa cr shoe ca i et pre you Yow wn rmpoen mad b opa opal frm you wart Dc aa Your {ae Tera be cart fer you ca wef yo tenpnse You can a ase co ra me mere aon aha Caton Sas (ain Seto Cr nerd ca got your enor, 8 courant Yu. ou ca pay ge, ‘Re covert fr we mre firm 900 Soe yor ace nbn, ou ay en cane eau an our wage ROMY. AP PoPATY ‘Moye tater wacarter uameg fn ese har aera rina, You ay wat cl nny gt wy. os 9 oko awry, you may wort clon moray ‘easy canna lr ny. Jory be ito ee op tervens ron a ore aa even re You can ea trae rove grape a he Cabo Lpu Sones sh wroteon ote Cabana Cours Orne Satay Cato (curio eget) craig ye oc coo cour ssteooabow NOTE: Teen Rass any anc woes fen and 505s ty wether aroan werd §1,00 omar «cas. Te cours hn ma ep ble te cnn sac wea {ins0r Laman own ronan Cen O30 ek, acre pu Ge otf oy wees By versa Los STAC "rm 2 OLAS OE CALENDARIO ceso ba waver eta tain ype eps pra procera una reseed rv nate cater hace qo whvogue una cpio domurcan Un cartnowa Saadeh ta to Su touts er ea Sa oe coer ‘romoto mp! crc dees sur procesun nano ena Ex poson Gs aa an nts ot wie uate vo’ pe bebe ‘oman enn enos orotate cate yas romain oo Cane oo Aas es de Caso trees ger ‘eno yo tea comands on scars gum mq man eros i une pagar cote rors bce 8 wate 0 cre {20 unr non do pgo de tes Sno presets raps # he, wes POR a0 Dr PATENTS CTS ‘ot outr ss mk rare y Gores sn nas roerarc ray ccs mus mga. rocarmabe gu ae 4 atoacoinmadatere Sine nae aun sbgnde puede ane #un vv de an a toga, So omdn pager +o ged we post gee cmp Con ke aos pa tre sericea nyaes utes ‘ora pron pas lo ua ace ro nc rte non a CaP Lie Set Red Sen Fe ae Jee, we Smeeyaea Lees San Fcc Semin Come SRE 1400 McAllister Sweet (Wt 16-559977 San Francisco, CA 54102 Tne ra, eet, rd wphone aes 2 a want menos: [einoméren arocctn y numero de lotro del abogedo tol Gomancue © to paar Coren Schwart, Dunn & Panagoteces LLP, 369 Pine St #306, under: (60° 418.10 (exmperaton) (CCP 410.80 (rior) [S 0cP 41820 dete coperaton) (GCP 418,70 (coranrvatee) cop ereo eenceaten er patnennie) [=] COP 41850 (auterand pavon) over taper: 4 operat aaery on (ete: PLD-PL008 [Caren Schwan (SAN 245409): Caron ac Cor (SBN 297832) ee Dum & con LLP 369 Pine St, Suite $06 Sen Francisco, CA 94104 raswenmr (415) 982-2100 rio rm (415) 982-2119 aoa scorss ome om sromrmons Pia Seta Barrows Fy ‘SUPERIOR COURT OF CALPORWA COUNTY OF San Francisco srreaconse 400 McAllister Street Sir o D susoromese 400 McAllister Sveet = crvaweazecooe San Francisco, CA 94102 +AN 28 29) xmcrnne” Unlined Cit udition curr, 16 PANTER Susan Barows we ERKOF tye Derenonv Thomas Materazzi; Uber Technologies, In.; = Rasier LLC; Rasier-CA LLC; and a (Zi vwes 170 20 ‘COMPLAINT—Personel injury, Property Damage, Wrongful Death Ta) AMENDED (lumber: Personal jury) Other Damages (apecty): edn ise aaa wT oe eat ig poor TY * FE teeae ren but dee sotercee sanson COC 16*550077- [Z AcTION 1s AN UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE (conde $25,000) (5 AcTION is RECLASSIFIED by tha amended complaint trom ini tweeted trom vetted i Hla 1. Plait (name or names: Susan Barrows seges causes of acon against defiant (nam o” aamay: ‘Thomas Materazzi; Uber Technologies, Inc; Rasier LLC; Rasier-CA LLC: and Does 1-20 2. Tia plecing using atachmants and ex, comit of the flowing numberof pages: 6 3. Each lant named aboveia a competent aut 8 except ait name) z Bit (1) [corporation quasi de businaas in Caller Am @ [5] enurincorortes enty (desea) (2) 1s pub nay (deserbe): (4) aminer Ca] an aout [= ferwhom a guaran or cnservater of he ena ora guaran ad er has been appcinid ernarfpeety © omer eoeciy: ©. except lan (rare) (1) [a corporation quad todo business in Catornia 2) anunincoorated ety (cover) (2) apa erty (sorb (4) aminoe (1) an act [= forwhom a guardian or conservator of he estate o «guardian ad Sem has been appolnied (©) ener roeot (9) eter eect Womaton swt eons lta who a nt compan adit i shown Aachen ory =e ‘COMPLAINT—Personal fury, Property ESS ndRS Rainey ‘Damage, Wrongful Death Puppioos Sore — Barrows v- Materazzi et al 4, CO Plains (name): 1 ag bas dr ein nae ch seca aoe wt eb bashes a 4. Cochieundantnoned bo sapere Te steemanenare pone Uber Techoologies «CZ exept deta rune: Rasier LLC (1) ) @ business organization, form unknown “ ‘s business organaation, form unknown © econo @ cement (3) 5) an unincorporated entity (descnbe): (3) [—) an unincorporated entity (describe): (4) (2) « public entity (describe): (4) () a pubic entity (describe): (8) 2) other (specify): (8) (2) other (specity): >. () except defendant (name): Rasier-CA LLC 4. (2) except defendant (name): (1) [1] # business organization, form unknown (1) (2) « business organization, form unknown (2) Za corporation (2) C2) a comporation (3) () an unincorporated entity (describe): (2) (> an unincorporated entity (describe): (6) 1 a pat ant (ascribe (4) 5 a public entity (describe: (8) (2) other rspecity: (8) other (apecitys: Information about additional defendants who are not natural persons is contained in Attachment 5 0. The rename dtr wed a Deus we ntnown t 2 C1 ove ateners ety Ove nanber he agra or ameoyn tar ee enna ee ne casera er Tam © CZ Bann Oo nr 120 (pains wow cpa uineun 7. Dotendants who ae joined under Code of Chi Procedure ston 282 are named) (8. Tris court me proper coun because 8 atleast one detest nw reson turer area. ». [the ptnapaplece of businens of « detandant corporation or unincorporated sasocaion ie jufecctonel ares, «Zz injury to person or damege to personal property oonted in jracona rv. 8 Cotter apc 8 Plains required to comply wih scale stl, and Li] has compted win appeabe aime ttn, or >. [1 in excused tom complying because (apecty) Toa aaa ‘COMPLAINT—Pereonal injury, Properly vores Damage, Wrongful ‘BeORT IME! oa ‘Barrows v, Materazzi et 10. "The folonng causes of acion are atiached nd re satrnents above apply o etch (ach compat must have ane or more causes of ecton atached): 11, Plait hae sure 12 Te damages caved for wrongful death and he reasonships of pant to the deceseed are = Hate Atachment 12, » aa totom: 19 The ret soughtin hie comolalnt wii he jutadction of i court Plaintiff hereby demands a jury tial, ‘4, Plain prays forget for costa of ut for such ree ana, jue, and equitable for © (1) [Z1) compunantry damages EJ] pune camegew ‘The aroun of camages ie (ncases for pertonal ry or wrongful dat, you must check (1): (1) [accor to proot 2 CO nite emountot § 18. [Z1 The paragraphs of ne complaint aleged on infomation and ba ar a fotos (sp80ty paragraph numbers): 1-13; Ist Cause of Action - Motor Vehicle (entre cause of action); 2nd Cause of Action - General [Negligence (entire cause of action); 3rd Cause of Action - Negligence Per Se (entire eause of action) outs: sanuary $, 2016 ph Loren Sohwarz » enon Soa OT ORT Pooper ‘COMPLAINT—Forsonal fury, Property aaa ‘Damage, Wrongful Death PLO-PLOOI(t) ‘SHORT TALE pecrrey ‘Barrows v. Materazzi etal First CAUSE OF ACTION—Motor Vehicle waren ATTACHMENT TO CZI Complaint (1 cross Complaint (Uae a separate couse of wlon for or eoch cus of scon) ; Print rome): Susan Barrows {MV Plait agen the ac of defeats ware agin the ats wee he eg pate) cause of iui acd camagen op the aa cored nie June 11, 2015 one) Plaintiff was riding her bicycle eastbound on Townsend St. in San Francisco ia the bicycle lane approsching 4th St. At or near this location, a passenger inside the vehicle being opernied by Defendant Materazzi and Does 6-10 opaned the passenger dooe directly into Plaintiffs pth of wavel, causing Plaintiff to impact the door, fll from her bicycle, and sustain injuries. MV-2, DEFENOANTS “The dfecdona who opus @ ot vase are (names) ‘Thomas Materazzi and TZ vos 6 » ». (ZI The defendants who employed he persone whe operated a ator vetil inthe course of hl emptyment sre (nares) ‘Thomas Materazzi; Uber Technologies, {nc.; Rasier LLC: Rasier-CA LLC, and TZ ove 6 te 1S © (Z1 The defendants wh owned he motor vl which wes operated wi ter permission are (names: ‘Thomas Materazzi; Uber Technologies, Inc.; Rasier LLC; Rasier-CA LLC, and TZ owe 6: » 1S 4 (ZL Tho catenaarta wha ernvaiod ne mote vehice ae [names Thomas Matorazel, Uber Technologies, ine Ranier LLC; Rasier-CA LLC, and i Zoos 6 » 1S | + CT dei eae sn dares lie obtener an acted win pe ‘of he agency ware (named): ‘Thomas Materazzi; Uber Technologies, Inc.; Rasier LLC; Rasier-CA LLC, and TD does 6 » 1S 1. 1) The detendasis who re Table pant for oar reas and the rewone forthe lably wre Cy iated in Atactnent 21") 0 flows: _tentats Se ‘CAUSE OF ACTION—Motor Vehicle cavemen PLD-pLo0y “SHORT THLE Sama Barrows v. Materazzi et al Second. CAUSE OF ACTION—General Negligence Page a ATTACHMENT TO CZ) Complaint [=] creas -Complant (Use saparata cause of econ fom ar ch cause of ston) GN, Piatt (name): Susan Barrows ‘soges tet dafendant name): Thomas Materazzi; Doom 1 IS wax tha legal (proximate) cause of damages to plant By be foowing acs or omissions to act, dalndant agloendy caused te damage io osnat ‘on (diay: June 11, 2015 a (pece): Townsend Street in San Francisco, CA; (escrpdon of essa for Baby) Plaintiff incorporates by reference as if fully set forth in this cause of action each and every allegation contained in Plaintiffs First Cause of Action - Motor Vehicle Negligence. Defendant Materazzi and DOES 1-15 had a duty o exercise reasonable cate to prevent harm to others. Defendant Materazzi breached his duty of care through his various acts and omissions, including ‘but not limited to allowing his passenger, DOE 1, to open the passenger door and attempt to exit the vehicle when it was not saftto do so, DOE 1 breached his duty of care through his various acts and omissions, including but not limited {to opening the passenger door when it was not safe 10 do 50. ‘As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of Defendants Materazzi and DOES 1-15, Plaintiff was caused to impact the passenger door which was opened by DOE | dicectly into her path of travel, causing her to impact the door, fall from her bicycle and sustain injuries and endant damages. [=e CAUSE OF AETION—Generalagigonce maeae none —_ ATTACHMENT (Number (1m Atachmant may be used with any Judicial Councd form) ‘THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION - NEGLIGENCE PER SE. Plaintiff incorporates by reference as if fully set forth in this cause of action each and every allegation ‘contained in Plaintiffs First Cause of Action - Motor Vehicle Negligence and Second Cause of Action - General Negligence. Defendants Materazzi and Does 1-10, and each of them, did violate numerous statutes, including but not limited to California Vehicle Code Sections 22517 and 22502. In violating the above-referenced statutes, Defendants Materazzi and Does 1-10 and each of them, directly ‘and proximately caused PlaintfPs injuries. Said Defendants violations of the aforementioned statutes thereby legally caused injury to Plaintiff Further, the resulting injuries were of a nature thatthe above-referenced stanutes were designed to prevent and Plaintiff is among the class of persons for whose protection the above-referenced statutes were adopted. ‘As such, Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereupon alleges that Defendants Materazzi and Does 1-10, ‘and each of them, are liable to Plaintiff under the doctrine of Negligence Per Se. Uo tom tat this Atachment concen is mae under pansy 0 parry, a statements in is ‘Attachment oe made under penaty of perry) 4 pages a3 reguies) = eo a Sees to sada Counc Form Eronour coe San France, CA 94102 ‘Unlimited Civil Jurisdiction er case Barrows. Materazl eta ou cASE Coven PET Comper Cave Deigaon Ge United) Ute vane Fone Cl coomer C2 senaee | S509 Gores nantes | ried tt npn y coat 7? Sestasoon $oecoerey| Mica maeeteart uasana. | oo Tams 1-8 bet il be comple (oe insiuctons 67 page 2 [F Ghd one bax below forthe case type tel best describes ie cane Parrerip corporat govrane (21) saree pao Prepay Compe Ch gti "no 2) FP ererctmmenmn ce) SERRE Tues Uninsured motor (48) ‘Rule 3740 cotecions (09) TE) Anmtrutrtrade regulation (23) cn nro Peon Ce ccs omnes era snares eae 8 preer) ‘anes ) Ober cosa” ror pon a) Proaetnny 20 feathery Enero (0) toc man) TE Errerisentamene I aac nrg tn ne cnrrrorna Es SSocnsione Sarre OMS (Ota Ton ‘Wrong avon 8) Soest ‘Business torwuntair business pracion (07) Orner reat propery (28) Enforcement of Judgrnent Saran Ovi Trower oem 2) Sy Datarnation (13) "commercial 31) ‘Miscataneoue Ctl Complaot ‘ Fre) anni 2) [1 reco en mh Seca ray na rer cpt tp 2) | Peet seipra a) a ne stazencove Gt Pten OnernenPsrarn ena) revere) Petrone: wenn mart (11 =} Qh pon twat aor 2) TE) wet of mance (02) 5 "Progh tian (8) Oper employment 15) er cil (8) 2 Tecate [J LeT anol copier onder ase 3.400 of he Calor Roe of Gaur Whe asa i coneion mat Re ‘elas reculing exceptional judi manager 2.) Large number of eaparanyrepresaniag parses 1 Extenab metion practi ring tit or nove lnaues hat wil be Sne-coneuing fo resaive 2) Sitatanel amount of document evdenae Lage numberof wineases ¢ coordination wih related actions pending in ne or more cours In omer counties, eats, or counties, or a fader! cour + [1 subeantia pongucgment uci! supervision Remedies sought (eneck at tat ape: a[Z] monetary >] orinunctive iat & punitive 2 onmonaary: deter 4 Nano tenet ain ovo, The (Motor Vehicle Negligence; Genera! Nenligenes; Negligence Per Se) 5 Thiscase Cis thar oe lanot _acoasacton aut ite a oe » ESAT BR FY TERRY WOTCE— + Paint mua le hie cove sheet wih the fit paper led nthe acon or roceecing (except wall cme cases o caves Hed ‘under te Probete Coe, Famy Code, or Wellar and inattvdons Coun (Cal Rule of Cou, rule 3220,) Fane to ry Aut Baanctone. «Fig is cover eheot a astion any cover sheet rq by tea out le 110s coe a complex uncer ue 3.400 wea, of tne Calfomia ules of Cour, you muat ware a copy of tis cover vet on ‘ther pares tothe action o proceeding. 1 Unless tis a coflecions case under rule 3740 ora complex case, his cover sheet wil be weed fr saison upon Fgaeeneee ‘GiviL CASE COVER SHEET Sys cmn10 INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO COMPLETE THE COVER SHEET ‘To Piainttte and Others Fling First Papers. Ifyou ae fling w fet paper (or example, comin) in « ci case, you must ‘Complete and fe, slong wih you fret paper, the Ch Case Cover Sheet contained on page 1. Tha iomation wil be wed to compe fataiea about te pes and numbers of esses Mle. Yeu must comoite tema 1 through 6 on the sheet in tam $, you must check ‘ne box for Bo cose ype tat bert describes the case. 1s cave ts BoP a general and a more apace ype of case fated ner {heck te more specie one. the cans hee mulple cauaes of acfon, check fe box tat best indian he primary cause of ecto. ‘Toaest you in completing the shook exes of te canes tat belong under aach cane ype i tam 1 ae proved below. A cover teat ml be fled ony wa your ral paper Fete lo Wea cover sheet wth the frat paper Bed in a ch case may subject 8 party, te course, or bot fo eancone under ues 290 and 3.220 of tha Catforia Rules of Court ‘Te Pardes in Rule 3.740 Collections Coase. A colectone cans” under re 3740 is defined an acon for recovery of marey ‘Oued iva uum atlad 1 be certain fuetls not more tan $28 00, exctuive of nerest and atom fet, aring Hor a vaneacion (they property, verican or money wea acquired on cred. A cectons cave doesnot incude an acon seating te folowing: (1) tot ‘Geages, 2) puntve darmmpes, (3) recovery of rel bropery, (4) recorry of peraonel propery, oF (9) # prehidgment wrt of ‘Stacheit. The idenicaion of © one an a lo 3.740 coleclons cane on fi form means Pat tll be exert om the general {ime-oreardce requramenta and case management re, unies © defendant flee responehe pleading Anue 3.740 colactone ‘Gave wi be autject to he raqurement or sevice snd obtshing judgment inrle 3740, ‘To Partne In Complex Cosas. In complex cases ony, pares must elo vs the Cid Case Cover Shot to dexignata whather the ‘ese 18 comple. I pant baieves tv cove complex under rule 3.400 of he Callin Rules of Cour, tia mun be inccstad by ihe appropiate bones in heme 1 and 2 Wa pal eagpaos a case an complex, he cover shoot rt De earved wit te

You might also like