Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTROLLED COPY 1 OF 2
INTRODUCTION
1.1
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
(ix)
1.2 Tenders were collected by the following six firms from the office of NESPAK
Islamabad by the date stipulated in Notice Inviting Tenders.
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
CONFIDENTIAL
CONTROLLED COPY 1 OF 2
1.3
Managing Director
Secretary/CAO
On Behalf of NESPAK
-
Project Manager
Engineers Representative, ISE
Project
Principal Architect
1.4
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
CONFIDENTIAL
CONTROLLED COPY 1 OF 2
1.5
2.
NAME OF FIRM
a.
b.
c.
d.
BID PRICE
(Rs.)
POSITION
865,669,100/Rebate of 3%
Net 839,699,027/871,745,030/875,953,595/887,785,244/-
1st Lowest
2nd Lowest
3rd Lowest
Highest
TENDER SECURITY
2.1
Amount
All bidders provided tender security amounting to Rs. 10.00 million in the
form of Bank Guarantee issued by Scheduled Bank of Pakistan in favor of
the Employer except M/s Mughals Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited who provided a
Bank Guarantee of 10.10 Million.
2.2
Validity
A validity of 90 days for tender security was required as per Instructions to
the Tenderers.
The status of validity of Tender Security of the participating firms is as
under:-
3.
i.
79 days
ii.
89 days
iii.
89 days
iv.
80 days
4.
ARITHMETICAL CHECK
3
CONFIDENTIAL
CONTROLLED COPY 1 OF 2
All bids were checked arithmetically. The bid prices after arithmetic
check/corrections are appended below. The position of bidders after the check
however remained unchanged.
SR.
No.
5.
NAME OF FIRM
CORRECTED BID
PRICE
(Rs.)
a.
b.
c.
d.
865,621,850/Rebate of 3%
Net 839,653,195/871,306,558/881,805,174/887,785,244/-
POSITION
1st Lowest
2nd Lowest
3rd Lowest
Highest
SCRUTINY OF TENDERS
5.1
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
CONFIDENTIAL
CONTROLLED COPY 1 OF 2
g.
h.
5.1.2 Volume-I
(Instructions to Tenderers, Tender and Appendices, Forms,
Conditions of Contract Part-I, Conditions of Contract Part-II,
(Conditions of Particular Application) Specifications-Special
Provisions).
i.
ii.
ii.
CONFIDENTIAL
CONTROLLED COPY 1 OF 2
CB-L-09,
Page
2580
iii.
iv.
ii.
Page No.2100-5 & 4610-1 have not been signed & stamped.
CONFIDENTIAL
CONTROLLED COPY 1 OF 2
Not Provided
5.3.4 Addendum No.1
The drawings issued vide Addendum No. 1 have not been
furnished.
5.4
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
CONFIDENTIAL
CONTROLLED COPY 1 OF 2
vii.
viii.
5.4.2 Volume-I
i.
ii.
ii.
CONFIDENTIAL
CONTROLLED COPY 1 OF 2
6.
EVALUATION
6.1
Technical Evaluation
6.1.1 M/s Habib Rafiq (Pvt.) Limited
i.
The time schedule for carrying out the work for basement
No. 3 in the Preliminary Time Schedule furnished against
Appendix-E to Tender has not been catered for.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
CONFIDENTIAL
CONTROLLED COPY 1 OF 2
ii.
iii.
6.2
Aluminum works
Under ground water tank
Foundations/Raft
Plinth beams
Financial Evaluation
During financial evaluation, following has been observed.
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
CONFIDENTIAL
CONTROLLED COPY 1 OF 2
6.3
SR.
NO.
a.
b.
c.
d.
NAME OF FIRM
BID PRICE
AFTER
EVALUATION
(RS.)
839,653,195/871,306,558/881,805,174/887,785,244/-
%AGE
ABOVE/BELOW
ENGINEERS
ESTIMATE
11.70 % above
15.92 % above
17.31 % above
18.11 % above
POSITION
1st lowest
2nd lowest
3rd lowest
Highest
RECOMMENDATIONS
The bid price of M/s Habib Rafiq (Pvt.) Limited is 11.70% (Eleven point seven
zero percent) above the Confidential Engineers Estimate.
It is recommended that M/s Habib Rafiq (Pvt.) Limited, being the lowest, may be
awarded the work at their rebated price of Rs. 839,653,195
(Rupees eight thirty nine million, six hundred fifty three thousand, one hundred
ninety five only) subject to the unconditional withdrawal of all requests &
assumptions submitted in their Tender Letter No. HRL/RO/AMS-1892 dated
February 17, 2006.
Further more, if Islamabad Stock Exchange decides to award the works to
M/s Habib Rafiq (Pvt.) Limited, the Contractor is to be advised to comply with the
observations of the Technical Evaluation as provided under Para 6.1.1,
sub-para i to vii above, as per the stipulated Conditions of Contract.
11