Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.
Introduction..
Overview of Alternatives.
Criteria.
Method.
Primary Research.
Secondary Research.
Conclusion
Recommendations
Sources.
Appendix..
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Pages 5-11
Pages 5-7
Pages 8-11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Pages 15-17
Executive Summary:
Detroit currently faces a problem with the number of available recycling opportunities for
its citizens, and the best way to solve it is to provide more funding towards alleviating the issue.
Not only does it provide the citizens with a means to help be more eco-friendly and green, but it
also provides them with a chance to help renovate the city and make it cleaner, healthier, and
possibly more profitable. The privatization of Detroits waste management services means that
the city doesnt provide much funding towards recycling and instead pays the bare minimum.
Introduction:
This report discusses the feasibility of extending more recycling opportunities for citizens
of the city of Detroit, including both private and public entities. The city currently does not
provide enough funding in its budget to provide the city with a detailed, in-depth recycling
program, and it is then in the hands of other organizations and volunteers to help work towards
eliminating a large recycling deficit.
The city of Detroit currently faces a large recycling deficit and is far beyond other major
cities in the nation in terms of recycling and effective solid waste management. The city
currently burns garbage in an incinerator, including thousands of tons of recyclable material each
Overview of Alternatives:
Furthered recycling opportunities could be made possible throughout the city of Detroit.
With ample time and resources, the city of Detroit could make its way to be one of the greenest
cities in the nation. However, in the current state, it is unlikely for this to come true without the
city and/or its citizens putting in a lot of time and effort to help diminish the problem. There are
three routes that the city of Detroit could take towards enhancing recycling opportunities for its
citizens and general eco-friendliness of the city:
Stick with the current allocation of funds from the city budget. The city of
Detroit could continue to budget accordingly and continue privatization of solid waste
management services in hopes that more citizens will take advantage of the limited recycling
Criteria:
Setting up recycling bins in Detroit is a big step to take. Toronto, another major city, has a
exceptional recycling program that has gain tens of millions of dollars to the City of Toronto. If
Detroit went in the same direction as Toronto, it could gain the same profit, but it may not be
feasible to recycle in Detroit like it is in Toronto. There is many data and criteria that can
determine whether it is feasible.
Budget. Detroit does not have enough money to support its own city recycling
organization. According to city council reports, the City of Detroit does not have enough money
in its budget to support a city wide recycling program. Detroit does have enough money to
Method:
To gain a better understanding of Detroits current recycling situation, we planned to
contact Detroit City Council member Brian Conaway, who is in charge of waste management
throughout the city. We also reached out to the two companies contracted out from Detroit to
take care of waste management, Rizzo Environmental Services and Advanced Disposal.
However, we were unsuccessful in reaching anyone from the three organizations.
We spoke to a representative from Green Living Science, an organization located near
New Center in Midtown, Detroit, regarding recycling, their efforts, and what needs to be done in
Primary Research
We interviewed Brittany Mitchell, a representative for Green Living Science, regarding
their efforts in Detroit. We were mostly concerned about the possibility of providing bins to
residents of the city, as well as providing larger containers for recycling that could be used for
apartment buildings, neighborhoods, et cetera. We were also curious as to whether or not they
had raw data regarding the amount of material being recycled, where the most/least recycling
occurred, and the overall success of the organization.
Unfortunately for us, Green Living Science was not exactly the resource we were looking
for. Brittany informed us that of the two main recycling entities throughout the city of Detroit,
GLS was primarily responsible for education and outreach. Their goal was to educate the citizens
of Detroit regarding the facts of recycling, what it can do for the city, and the repercussions of
not acting to eliminate the problem. Their partner, Recycle Here!, is responsible for the raw data.
The main groups they reached out to were businesses and schools. They partnered with
40 of the 160 schools within the Detroit Public School system to set up recycling services at the
school and to educate the students about recycling. However, they faced a problem because the
various charter schools set up throughout the area would not partake, as they would not pay for
the recycling units.
GLS also targets businesses to ensure bulk recycling of packaging materials, like plastics and
cardboard, as well as paper and other recyclable materials. In 2016, they granted 11 businesses,
both small and large, the title of being Green Friendly for Detroit, which means they meet a
certain recycling quota and enforce certain protocol to ensure that they recycle as much material
as possible from their businesses.
GLS provides the citizens throughout Detroit with the opportunity for curbside recycling
pickup. The bins are a one-time cost of $25, and they register you with either Rizzo or Advanced
Disposal to ensure they pick up your bin. You can also receive a bin by going to a free volunteer
workshop, in which members of GLS teach you what can and cant be recycled, among other
things. Nearly 15,000 of Detroits 750,000 residents partake in the program, but they want their
A map of Detroit showing where residents are registered for curbside recycling pick up. It is heavily used in section
4 on the east side, but the west and southwest still remain largely uninvolved.
Brittany informed us of the difficulties of setting up community recycling for all residents
of Detroit. She said that of the recycled materials coming into Recycle Here!, nearly 40% are
contaminated, deeming them unusable, or costing them much more money to purify the
materials. She said if we were to provide the community with free recycling bins, the lack of
education regarding recycling throughout the city would deem the bins as additional trash cans,
which would hinder the recycling process.
She also says that bins are expensive, and that the organization cant afford to be as
widespread as theyd like. Combined, Recycle Here! And Green Living Science run on a budget
of $375,000 a year, some from the city and some from donations. She believes that were the city
The data shows that in six months, GLS and Recycle Here! have increased their input of recyclable material more
than 100 tons. They have been working to increase community involvement in the past two years.
Secondary Research:
We researched the budgets of the three cities: Detroit, Sterling Heights, and Toronto, the
latter two having successful recycling programs implemented throughout their cities. Sterling
Heights program is only five years old, but has shown improvement over those five years in
amount of recycled materials, as well as increased cost for those that dont recycle (meaning
City
officials are working with private contractors to help alleviate the monthly fee associated with
the recycling pickup, and believe they could save residents more than $0.60 off the monthly fee.
The city is seeing improvement in the amount of materials being recycled, and city officials
believe extended recycling is helping clean up the city and make their residents happier.
The data also shows that although it costs the city more money each year to run recycling
centers, each person that chooses not to engage in the recycling program also costs the city an
increasing amount of money each year. There is a steady increase in residents that partake in the
program, which helps explain, yet also make up for, the increasing costs of running the program.
Annual Rate
Approved Rebate
Small
$244.77
$227.01
$17.76
Medium
$297.14
$181.76
$115.38
Large
$403.55
$108.41
$295.14
Extra Large
$468.08
$56.85
$411.23
Bag-Only
$156.69
$215.01
-$58.32
The bins provided in Toronto offer a rebate, which means the residents dont have to pay much to have their
recycling picked up. As incentive, they can also be paid to recycle, as the last row shows.
The average household would purchase the small bin, which would result in a cost
of only a few cents more than a dollar each month. The larger bins are used for businesses and
other organizations, and tax incentives by the local government ensure that the bins arent
overwhelmingly expensive for the companies.
Toronto is home to one of the most successful recycling programs in North
America, and between 2015 and 2016, their community involvement increased from 10% to 45%
in their recycling program. By 2022, they are projected to have 70% waste disposal in their city
based on the current plan, which is one of the highest in the world.
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Year
A factor that
sets Toronto apart from many other recycling programs in the world is the amount of profit they
make from their recycling program. The city takes the recycled materials, processes them, and
then sells them to businesses around the city and country. Their recycling program doesnt come
at a particularly high cost to the city or its residents because of how much money they receive.
Between 2010 and 2015, the city has made nearly 100 million USD on recycled materials, with
an estimated increase each year.
The city of Toronto brings in roughly $20 million a year to help pay for their recycling program. Detroit could
utilize this method to make up for the lack of funding.
Budget:
Recycling Budget
458,626
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
337,934
481,526
580,948
1,478,348
7,202,802*
3,126,291
*Detroit was taken over by an emergency manager to plan the budget during 2016-2016
Toronto Recycling Budget
Year
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
Recycling budget(millions)
5.6
13.3
5.4
936k
N/A
budget(millions)
826K
870K
1.3
811K
796K
WM services
budget(millions)
33.2
31.5
9.1
3.0
2.3
WM services
budget(millions)
7.7
4.5
4.7
4.8
5.3
Between 2012 and 2017 Detroits overall waste management budget has fluctuated, with
a large spike during 2015 and 2016 due to the emergency manager planning the budget.
However, the amount budgeted towards recycling has remained stagnant. Sterling Heights has
had the highest percentage of the three cities in terms of using the waste management budget
specifically for recycling. Toronto has a larger budget overall, which helps result in their
successful spending.
Conclusion
In its current state, the city of Detroit does not have the fiscal power to enact a
widespread recycling program throughout the city that is run by the local government. Compared
to cities like Sterling Heights and Toronto, the city has a much smaller budget, as well as an even
smaller percentage put forth towards solid waste management services. In order to provide
widespread recycling opportunities in Detroit, the city would have to allocate funding that they
dont have.
Waste management for the city of Detroit is not public, as it is a privatized industry. The
city divides waste management services between Rizzo Environmental Services and Advanced
Disposal, and they pay them according to the amount of work they do and the span of the city
that they cover. Enabling further recycling throughout the city would require paying both the
organizations more money, which the city does not have to spare in their budget. Instead,
recycling must be taken over and maintained by separate entities, like Recycle Here! And Green
Living Science.
Secondary organizations specializing in recycling, as well as volunteer work, would be
the most practical means to bringing further recycling opportunities to the people throughout
Detroit. Over the past few years, they have increased community involvement and provided
more than 15,000 residents with the opportunity to recycle from the comfort of their homes. An
influx of funds and resources from the city of Detroit could allow for much more success and
widespread recycling and clean up throughout Detroit.
Recommendations
Ideally, Detroit could publicize their waste management system and allocate much more
funding towards recycling efforts, but the city does not possess as large a budget as Sterling
Heights or Toronto. The answer to solving the lack of recycling opportunities does rely heavily
on money, and although Detroit doesnt have the budget to fully enable various programs, any
money and resources they provide to other organizations could prove very helpful. We believe
that Detroit has a few options to help provide more recycling:
Invest in Green Living Science and Recycle Here!. These two organizations, which
work hand-in-hand to make Detroit more eco-friendly, have connections and methods to provide
further recycling opportunities to more citizens in Detroit. In addition to working with businesses
to recycle in bulk, they also can work with schools to educate the youth and their families in
Detroit about recycling and its importance. Detroit could provide them with resources they
couldnt otherwise access:
Sources:
Overview - Garbage & Recycling - Services | City of Toronto. (n.d.). Retrieved April 25, 2016,
from http://www1.toronto.ca/wps/portal/contentonly?
vgnextoid=03ec433112b02410VgnVCM10000071d60f89RCRD
Delaney, S. (n.d.). STERLING HEIGHTS: Curbside recycling: Six months later - News - Source
Newspapers. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from
http://www.sourcenewspapers.com/articles/2013/11/07/news/doc527bac0ce214b418184584.txt
Czarnik, E. (n.d.). City switches to new recycling schedule. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from
http://www.candgnews.com/news/city-switches-new-recycling-schedule
Delaney, S. (n.d.). Sterling Heights moves closer to awarding refuse contract - News - Source
Newspapers. Retrieved April 25, 2016, from
http://www.sourcenewspapers.com/articles/2016/03/02/news/doc56d75d654e48d798170302.txt
Appendix:
Annual Rate
Approved Rebate
Small
$244.77
$227.01
$17.76
Medium
$297.14
$181.76
$115.38
Large
$403.55
$108.41
$295.14
Extra Large
$468.08
$56.85
$411.23
Bag-Only
$156.69
$215.01
-$58.32
Year
Recycling Budget
Total WM Services
2012-2013
458,626
budget
2,305,120
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
337,934
481,526
580,948
1,478,348
57,202,802
30,126,291
Recycling
budget(millions)
5.6
13.3
7.9
936k
N/A
budget(millions)
826K
741K
783K
811k
870k
WM services
budget(millions)
33.2
31.5
9.1
3.0
2.3
WM services
budget(millions)
74.7
4.5
4.7
4.8
5.3