Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pakistan has been ranked 34 out of 52 countries in the World Economic Forums first
Financial Development Report, which was released in Pakistan through the Competitiveness
Support Fund (CSF) in December, 2008. The report is a comprehensive analysis of financial
systems and capital markets in 52 countries that explores key drivers of financial system
development and economic growth in developing and developed countries and serves as a
tool by which countries can benchmark themselves and establish priorities for financial
system improvement. Pakistans Banking sector turned profitable in 2002. Their profits
continued to rise for the next five years and peaked to Rs 84.1 ($1.1 billion) billion in 2006.
Arthur Bayhan, Chief Executive of the Competitiveness Support, told the media: I am very
happy to see that financial system in Pakistan is well reformed and competitive vis--vis Asia
and Europe. Pakistan is ranked ahead of the Russian Federation (35), Indonesia (38), Turkey
(39), Poland (41), Brazil (40), Philippines (48) and Kazakhstan (45). Under Factors, Policies
and Institutions pillar, Pakistan ranks 49th in institutional environment, 50th in business
environment and 37th in Financial Stability.
In the Financial Intermediation Pillar Pakistan ranks 25th in banks, 42nd in non banks and
17th in Financial Markets. Under Capital Availability and Access, Pakistan ranks 33rd.
Indicators showed that in business environment Pakistan had development advantage in
Cost to Export, ranking 6th, Cost of closing business 5th.
In corporate governance Pakistan ranked at the very top in shareholder rights index, 14th in
strength of investor protection.
In the Non banks pillar, Pakistan ranked 9th in the Real growth of direct insurance
premiums. In equity market movement Pakistan ranked at the top again in equity market
turnover.
Page 1
In the 1990s, economic growth plummeted to between 3% and 4%, poverty rose to 33%,
inflation was in double digits and the foreign debt mounted to nearly the entire GDP of
Pakistan as the governments of Benazir Bhutto (PPP) and Nawaz Sharif (PML) played musical
chairs. Before Sharif was ousted in 1999, the two parties had presided over a decade of
corruption and mismanagement. In 1999 Pakistans total public debt as percentage of GDP
was the highest in South Asia 99.3 percent of its GDP and 629 percent of its revenue
receipts, compared to Sri Lanka (91.1% & 528.3% respectively in 1998) and India (47.2% &
384.9% respectively in 1998). Internal Debt of Pakistan in 1999 was 45.6 per cent of GDP
and 289.1 per cent of its revenue receipts, as compared to Sri Lanka (45.7% & 264.8%
respectively in 1998) and India (44.0% & 358.4% respectively in 1998).
Page 2
After a relatively peaceful but economically stagnant decade of the 1990s, the year 1999
brought a bloodless coup led by General Pervez Musharraf, ushering in an era of accelerated
economic growth that led to more than doubling of the national GDP, and dramatic
expansion in Pakistan's urban middle class.
Pakistan became one of the four fastest growing economies in the Asian region during 200007 with its growth averaging 7.0 per cent per year for most of this period. As a result of
strong economic growth, Pakistan succeeded in reducing poverty by one-half, creating
almost 13 million jobs, halving the country's debt burden, raising foreign exchange reserves
to a comfortable position and propping the country's exchange rate, restoring investors'
confidence and most importantly, taking Pakistan out of the IMF Program.
The above facts were acknowledged by the current PPP government in a Memorandum of
Economic and Financial Policies (MEFP) for 2008/09-2009/10, while signing agreement with
the IMF on November 20, 2008. The document clearly (but grudgingly) acknowledged that
"Pakistan's economy witnessed a major economic transformation in the last decade. The
country's real GDP increased from $60 billion to $170 billion, with per capita income rising
from under $500 to over $1000 during 2000-07". It further acknowledged that "the volume
of international trade increased from $20 billion to nearly $60 billion. The improved
macroeconomic performance enabled Pakistan to re-enter the international capital markets
in the mid-2000s. Large capital inflows financed the current account deficit and contributed
Financial Sector of Pakistan
Page 3
to an increase in gross official reserves to $14.3 billion at end-June 2007. Buoyant output
growth, low inflation, and the government's social policies contributed to a reduction in
poverty and improvement in many social indicators". (see MEFP, November 20, 2008, Para1
The decade also cast a huge shadow of the US "war on terror" on Pakistan, eventually
turning the nation into a frontline state in the increasingly deadly conflict that shows no
signs of abating. Along with the blood and gore and chaos on the streets, there are hopeful
signs that rule of law and accountability is beginning to prevail in the country with the
restoration of representative democracy and independent judiciary, largely in response to
an increasingly assertive urban middle class, vibrant mass media and growing civil society.
The Zardari-Gilani government inherited a relatively sound economy on March 31, 2008. It
inherited foreign exchange reserves of $13.3 billion, exchange rate at Rs62.76 per US dollar,
the KSE index at 15,125 with market capitalization at $74 billion, inflation at 20.6 per cent
and the country's debt burden on a declining path. The government itself acknowledged in
the same document that "the macroeconomic situation deteriorated significantly in
2007/08 and the first four months of 2008/09 owing to adverse security developments,
large exogenous price shocks (oil and food), global financial turmoil, and policy inaction
during the political transition to the new government". (Para 3 of the MEFP, November 20,
2008.
Why is it that Pakistani economy has done well under military governments and performed
poorly when led by politicians? To put it all in perspective, let's recall how late Dr. Mahbub
ul-Haq, the renowned Pakistani economist who is credited with the idea of UNDP's human
development index (HDI), explained the corrosive impact of political patronage on economic
policy in Pakistan. In a 10/12/1988 interview with Professor Anatol Lieven of King's College
and quoted in a recent book "Pakistan-A Hard Country", here is what Dr. Haq said:
"..Every time a new political government comes in they have to distribute huge amounts of
state money and jobs as rewards to politicians who have supported them, and short term
populist measures to try to convince the people that their election promises meant
something, which leaves nothing for long-term development. As far as development is
concerned, our system has all the worst features of oligarchy and democracy put together.
That is why only technocratic, non-political governments in Pakistan have ever been able to
increase revenues. But they can not stay in power for long because they have no political
support...For the same reason we have not been able to deregulate the economy as much
as I wanted, despite seven years of trying, because the politicians and officials both like the
system Bhutto (Late Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto) put in place. It suits them both very
well, because it gave them lots of lucrative state-sponsored jobs in industry and banking to
take for themselves or distribute to their relatives and supporters."
Page 4
Issue of notes.
Regulation and supervision of the financial system.
Bankers bank.
Lender of the last resort.
Banker to Government.
Conduct of monetary policy.
Main Responsibilities
Regulation of liquidity:
Being the Central Bank of the country, State Bank of Pakistan has been entrusted with the
responsibility to formulate and conduct monetary and credit policy in a manner consistent
with the Governments targets for growth and inflation and the recommendations of the
Monetary and Fiscal Policies Co-ordination Board with respect to macro-economic policy
objectives.
Financial Sector of Pakistan
Page 5
To regulate the volume and the direction of flow of credit to different uses and sectors, the
Bank makes use of both direct and indirect instruments of monetary management. Until
recently, the monetary and credit scenario was characterized by acute segmentation of
credit markets with all the attendant distortions. Pakistan embarked upon a program of
financial sector reforms in the late 1980s.
Page 6
required to maintain capital and unencumbered general reserves equivalent to 8 per cent of
its risk weighted assets.
The "Rules of Business" for NBFIs became effective since the day NBFIs came under State
Banks jurisdiction. As from January, 1997, modarbas and leasing companies, which are also
specialized types of NBFIs, are being regulated/ supervised by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SECP), rather than the State Bank of Pakistan.
Page 7
As the custodian of countrys external reserves, the State Bank is also responsible for the
management of the foreign exchange reserves. The task is being performed by an
Investment Committee which, after taking into consideration the overall level of reserves,
maturities and payment obligations, takes decision to make investment of surplus funds in
such a manner that ensures liquidity of funds as well as maximises the earnings. These
reserves are also being used for intervention in the foreign exchange market. For this
purpose, a Foreign Exchange Dealing Room has been set up at the Central Directorate of
State Bank of Pakistan and services of a Forex Expert have been acquired.
Page 8
SBP is the sole authority to issue currency notes in the country. SBP has issued 10,
20, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 5000 denomination rupees note.
10, 20, 50 and 100 rupee are issued by the SBP in July 1976. 500 rupee note was
issued in April 1986. 1000 rupee note in July 1987 and 5000 rupee note in 2005.
SBP has 3 offices of note issue situated at Karachi, Lahore and Peshawar.
SBP floats new loans on the behalf of federal and provincial governments.
The bank also accepts the govt. cheques and drafts and also collects such cheques
and drafts which are drawn on other banks.
It is responsible for transferring government funds across the country.
Manages the public debts of the federal & provincial governments.
It also checks and maintains the foreign exchange remittance.
It is authorized to sell govt. treasury bills and prize bonds.
It is responsible for the payment of salaries and pensions, to govt. employees.
It also advances short term loans to the govt. by discounting its treasury bills.
It also advances loans to the govt. These advances are made without demanding
any collateral or securities.
Bankers Bank:
SBP is the bank of all commercial banks working in Pakistan. Commercial banks are entitled
to take loans from State Bank of Pakistan.
All the Scheduled banks are required to maintain at least 5% of the total demand and
time liabilities with the SBP.
Foreign banks working in Pakistan are required to maintain 7% cash reserves for
their demand and time liabilities.
Page 9
SBP makes advances and loans to such institutions and banks which are working for the
advancement of agriculture and industrial sectors.
It also lends against those securities which have been specified in SBP Act. Also the SBP can
sell, purchase, hold debentures of any banking company or of any financing corporation
which has been set up for the improvement of any sector of the economy.
Secondary
Agent to the Government:
SBP also functions as the agent to the government. It
represents government on various economic issues and monetary matters. It also enjoys the
responsibility of making all sorts of making adjustments regarding conversion or redemption
of government loans. The underwriting of the securities of govt. is also one of the essential
responsibilities of State Bank of Pakistan.
Page 10
Introduction:
Various economists have different views about the role of commercial banks in
economic development. Schumpeter says, It is the banking system which serves as a
key agent along with the entrepreneur in the process of economic development.
According to Prof. Cameron in his Banking and Economic Development, a banking
system may make a positive contribution to economic growth and development.
Contents:
Page 11
Bank of Khyber
Bank of Punjab
First Women Bank
Sindh Bank
Specialized Banks:
Page 12
Commercial Banks
Bank AL Habib
Bank Alfalah
Askari Bank
Barclays Bank Pakistan
First Women Bank
Faysal Bank
Habib Bank Limited
Habib Metropolitan Bank
Foreign Banks
Deutsche Bank AG
HSBC Bank Middle East Limited
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited
Page 13
Islamic Banks
Al Baraka Bank
Microfinance Bank
2)
Mobilization of Savings
There operates vicious circle of poverty in developing countries like Pakistan. So,
savings remain at the lowest level. Savings of people are very low due to international
demonstration effect in Pakistan. Banks are playing important role in the mobilization of
saving by introducing a variety of saving schemes. Banks induce the people to earn
interest through saving and it provides various facilities in a country to create a will and
power to save. Domestic savings are 9.5 % of GDP.
Page 14
3)
Availability of Funds
An additional point of role of banks is more availability of funds. Poor population has
poor resources for the economic development in poor countries like Pakistan. the
activities like inventions and innovations, research and development and initiatives
(effectiveness in responding to challenges) are impossible due to insufficiency of funds
in these countries. Banks remove the deficiency of capital by providing different types of
funds that leads to economic development.
4)
5)
6)
7)
Page 15
banks i.e., PICIC, IDBP etc. are provided their remarkable services for the development
of industrial sector. Industrial development leads to agricultural development and it
results in economic development. Growth rate of industries is 1.7%.
8)
Expansion of Market
Commercial banks help in the expansion of market. They help in the formation of
sound economic infrastructure in order to raise living standards and to expand trade and
commerce of an economy. Commercial banks cause development of industrial as well as
agriculture sector. Accordingly, there is expansion of market that results in economic
development.
9)
Page 16
meet the budget deficits. To cover the gap between the expenditures and revenues,
government borrows from the banks. As a result, the development process can be
started through borrowed money from banks. Budget deficit is 5.3 % of GDP.
12) Optimum Utilization of Resources
Commercial banks help in the just and optimum allocation of resources. Some mega
projects cannot be started due to the lack of capital. Commercial banks provide loans
and remove the problem of deficiency of capital. Due to use of resources in an econo my,
there is increase in production, income and employment etc. Increase in these things
leads to economic development. Natural resources contribute to GDP just less than 1 %.
13) Surplus in Balance of Payment
Developing countries are facing the problem of deficit in their balance of payment.
Commercial banks are helpful to overcome this problem. Due to commercial banks, a
country can improve its economy and can attain the self-sufficiency all this causes in
favourable balance of trade. So, banks are helpful for the surplus in balance of payment.
14) Creators and Distributors of Money
Creation of money and distribution of money are the two main objectives of
commercial bank. Commercial banks move the finances toward productive uses. There
are a lot of problems in the way of economic development like inflation, deflation, low
investment and saving etc. All these problems are possible to remove through creation
and distribution of money by commercial banks. So, fluctuation in the supply of money
can attain the economic development.
15) Provision of Valuable Services
The commercial banks are providing a lot of valuable services for the economic
development. Some of the most important services provided by commercial banks are as
under:
Page 17
Mobile Banking and Call Centres, Smart Card and Debit Card.
Insurance Sector
Insurance Sector has registered a very slow growth in the history of Pakistan. Based on our
research, the following conclusions emerge:
1. Listed insurance sector on Karachi Stock Exchange in terms of companies is only
4.4%.
2. Share of listed insurance sector on total listed companies on Karachi Stock Exchange
is only 1.41%.
3. Out of 637 listed companies, only 29 relate to insurance sector.
4. From the birth of Pakistan till now we have added only 29 listed companies- giving us
a ratio of less than 0.5 per company per year.
5. Turnover for 10 months (January October 2007) on the Karachi Stock market was
only 1.55% of the total turnover.
6. Share of insurance sector on listed companies on Karachi Stock Exchange is only
3.83% in respect of Market Capitalization.
7. Share of insurance in GDP of Pakistan is only 1.80%. Ten percentage companies
shares are listed below par. Therefore, these are sick. They need revival.
8. In the case of life insurance there is a vast scope. State Life Insurance Corporation of
Pakistan should be immediately privatized. Their Mission Statement should be
reviewed and revisited and on war-footing Insurance Policy of a vibrant nature
should be developed so that Insurance Sector starts serving the economy of the
country. As of today, excluding Group Insurance, there are hardly 2.5 million people
in a total population on 166 million who enjoy the life insurance cover. This
percentage requires to be given a quantum jump so that its expansion is seen for the
Financial Sector of Pakistan
Page 18
benefit of the community. In this respect, we plan to develop a draft Insurance Policy
for submission to the democratic Government of Pakistan so that they give a serious
attention to this critical area and also develop insurance
(Conventional)
and
Insurance in Pakistan is regulated under the Insurance Ordinance, 2000. In the past few
years, it has transformed into a developing and fastly growing market that is generally
divided into three components: life insurance, general insurance and health insurance.
The Government of Pakistan established the Department of Insurance in April 1948 as a
department of the Ministry of Commerce; the aim of this department is to take care of
affairs related to the insurance industry. Out of the 54% that Pakistan's service sector
contributes to the national GDP, insurance, along with transport, storage, communications
and finance occupy 24% of the sector.
Page 19
What these companies share in common, though, is an obligation (an onerous one
according tosome) to reinsure a mandatory 20 per cant (it used to be 30%) of their
insurance business withPakistan Insurance Corporation (PIC), which was established in 1952
to provide reinsurancefacilities within Pakistan and overseas, and to develop the insurance
by offering technical andexpert advice. PIC has grown substantially since 1953, with its
Gross Premium Income in thelast five years being above the 1 billion mark. Its overall
profitability has wavered, falling froman all time high of Rs. 119 million in 1991 to below Rs.
50 million in 1991.
Apart from this obligation to reinsure with PIC, the general insurance companies are left
largelyto themselves and expected to be self-regulatory. Their Fire, Motor, Workmen's
Compensationand Marine classes of business are governed by a Tariff which is determined
by themselvesthrough their Insurance Association. Their maximum statutorily approved
agency commissionrates of 15 per cent for Marine business and 20 per cent for Non-Marine
business have become more gentlemanly statements of intent than rigorously enforced
standards.
In their business, insurance companies are monitored by the Controller of Insurance, anad
ministrative arm not of the Ministry of Industries but of the Ministry of Commerce. They
areregulated by Insurance Rules of 1958, approved in the same year as the distant Martial
Law coupof Ayub Khan. And they are governed by a law - the Insurance Act of 1938,
promulgated a year before the outbreak of the Second World War. To fatalism and
pragmatism, one should perhapstherefore add the world Archaism, for no sector of
Pakistan's financial services market stands sodeeply mired in its past, nor has as much need
for deregulation and modernisation, if it is to prepare itself for the future. than the
insurance business sector in Pakistan.
There is no equivalent to the Companies Ordinance 1984 in the insurance sector. There is
noappropriate counterpart to the Corporate Law Authority, to give an impetus to its
development or to safeguard the interest of the public. The recent spectacular growth in the
financial servicessector, in my opinion, was no accident. It was the direct fertile result of an
environment madereceptive by regulated incentives and governmental initiative.
Can the insurance business of Pakistan achieve the same sort of success? I cannot see
why not.What than should be the direction of the insurance sector? What should be its
role? An attemptwas made seven years ago to answer these questions when, in 1987, a
Government Commissionwas constituted to diagnose the malaise in the insurance sector.
The report, submitted to theGovernment three years later, identified some of its more
reprehensible
practices
for
example,the methods used by insurance companies to obtain business particularly through
banks,irregularities in settlement of claims, the indisciplined and unethical practices of
insurance surveyors, methods of rebating, commissions to agents, and discounts.
Financial Sector of Pakistan
Page 20
Whatever good that three volume report contained was interred with its bones; the evils it
hopedto exercise continued to live long after it. More recently, last year in August 1993,
another reviewtook place when, in an Overview of the Insurance Industry by one of the
leading brokeragehouses, Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Limited, the major problems were
identified as:
It would be hard to question the justification for these complaints. It would be even harder
to justify why the insurance companies have done so little to assuage them. If the future
of business sector is to grow and match the expanding requirements of Pakistan'seconomy,
there are key areas in which the insurance companies must themselves take theinitiative.
The first must be education. No one should be allowed to forget that insurance being
acustomer service oriented business, its success depends heavily on the quality and calibre
of its personnel. In the United Kingdom, it was once considered enough for a new entrant
into the business to have five GCEO levels and then spend his life within the same
organisation learningthe job on the job. Today, anyone wanting to make a career in
Insurance should expect to beready to tackle very focused courses, like those conducted by
the College of Insurance in London.
Insurance may have been a business by men; it is rapidly becoming one managed by
women. Aninteresting aftermath of the second income phenomenon has been that in the
United Kingdom,out of a total employment in the insurance business of almost 400,000
employed, 49.3 per centhave been women. Another significant feature has been that 8 per
cent are the total strength is self-employed.
This emphasis on education, though needs to go beyond the potential or existing employees
ininsurance companies. Another audience whose knowledge of the insurance business
should never be presumed but whose ignorance can have damaging consequences is that
of the law makers themselves. It took Great Britain over a century to recognise the
significance of this advantage.Only as recently as 1991 was an All Party Parliamentary Group
on Insurance and FinancialServices formed to act as a bridge between the lawmaking MPs
and a law-abiding industry.
Without a better understanding of the business of insurance, should one honestly expectlegi
slators to be able or equipped to promulgate sound and appropriate laws? And what about
Financial Sector of Pakistan
Page 21
Page 22
sector - both of Life and General - will be a translation of these responsibilities and
opportunities into productive action.
The largest mobiliser of funds in the insurance market has been unquestionably the State
Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan. Since 1972, following the traumatic nationalisation
of life business, SLIC has grown tremendously. Its premium income has increased from Rs.
316 million in 1973 - the first year of its consolidation to Rs. 5 billion in 1994, equalling the
total Gross Direct Premium of all the 52 companies in the general sector.
SLIC's investment portfolio grew from Rs. 1.4 billion to Rs. 21 billion, and not surprisingly
SLIC's investment income has now become almost one-third of its total income. Its yield on
Life Funds is about 14.4 per cent which may explain why the new companies which have
been granted permission to do life business are displaying an understandable hesitancy.
Nothing is secret in the public sector, and certainly the use of SLIC's funds over the years to
finance Government has been no secret. SLIC's portfolio consists primarily of Government
securities. That in itself is not a problem. What one needs to identify is the impact on the
Government's reliance upon SLIC as a resource, should SLIC be privatised to the point where
its policies could be brought more in line with market imperatives and competitive
investment options.
It is already more than eight years since the Insurance Reforms Commission was
established. During this period, because of Deregulation and Privatisation, the whole
financial services market has undergone an irreversible change. Further privatisation will
bring about additional responsibilities, which means more costs, as insurance of commercial
risks becomes no longer a matter of choice but an inescapable requirement. Businessmen of
tomorrow will have to accept that insurance policies are not a chance talisman against
calamities. Used prudently, they can be are silient and reliable safety net, providing them
and the economy with a level of confidence to take risks which are quantifiable and
knowingly and prudently underwritten.
In another six years Pakistan will be in the 21st century. No one would expect that all of the
aspects of the insurance business whether legislative, regulatory or commercial - will be in
place by then. A reasonable expectation would be that significant steps would be taken to
move in those directions.
Talleyrand once said that war is much too serious a business to be left to military men.
Similarly, perhaps, the future role of Insurance in Pakistan is too serious to be left only to
insurancemen.Its future lies in the hands of better informed legislators, more responsible in
surance professionals, and perhaps most importantly of all, more discerning and demanding
customersthemselves. Collectively they can, and I am sure, will fashion the future role of the
insurancesector in Pakistan.
Page 23
Page 24
Political instability.
Underdeveloped capital market.
Govt & public debts.
Shortcomings in foreign exchange.
Foreign Loans
Solutions:
Strengthen Investment Banking.
Promotion of banking at the grassroots level.
Strong coordination between monetary and fiscal authorities.
Page 25
References
www.sbp.org.pk
www.secp.govt.pk
www.finance.govt.pk/survey
www.scribd.com
www.nation.com.pk/business
www.wikipedia.com
www.ehsankhaneco.blogspot.com
www.googlescholers.com
Articles by Khawaja Amjad Seed
Money Banking and Finance by Riaz Ahmed Mian
Page 26