You are on page 1of 4
Eo. Ret. No. caPio| F101) (Date. 10... : (tage Seceon) CAPIO/ Deputy Registrar (Leg Boye A.M.U. Aligarh Dated, AS --"t Please refer tothe notice vide D.No 1361/Proc dated 22.04.2010 issued by the Proctor Uttice t suspend Mr.Afaq Ahmad, Class- M.Phil Mass Communication Under section 6(1) read with section 7(1) I may be informed on the followin 1. Furnish a copy of that leter which was received on 21.04.2010 whereby the abovementioned student ‘threatened’ the Vice-Chancellor. Whether AMU administration possesses the original eopy of the said leter? Under Section 2G) ofthe RTI Act, 2005 | ‘wich a ingpect the original copy ofthe letter which was received by VC Office on 21.04.2010. Provide time and date for inspecto Furnish detailed information o state how AMU administration knew that the video clipping doue by the abovementioned student was “with a view to malign the redentil of the VM Hall administration’ Furnish relevant AcUStatutes/ Ordinances/Rules and Regulation at place which prohibit any student of any Halls of Residence to make any video clip of the Hall without the prior pormisaiun of the Provost Furnish detailed information available wi the flowing sentences it has written in the suspension notice reported and alleged that the abovementioned student on be proved misconuuct aempued w exert pressure on Uni supporters to withdrans the order Why Proctors Office charged the abovementioned student under Part Il, Rule 4) & (i of the AMU Students Conduct & Discipline Act, 1985, Fumish the complaint leter received atthe Procirs Office to substantiate te charge under Part I, Rule 4{iv) of the AML Students Conduct & Discipline Act, 1085 against he abovernentioned st any student brings any ousider inside the Hall Premises who take the Guest Slip of Dining Hall wo eat thee, whether Par I Kule 4 (vil) of AMU Students Conduct an Discipline Act ean be used toch inst the student for bringing that outsider Hal? Under what circumstances this panicular rule can be exempted! Refer to the letter no vide D.no 432/VC dated 15,04,2010 received at the VC Office. FFumish details ofthe date wise progress made on the sa letter andthe all the comments made by all the AMU official on the eid later Postal Order of No... (8F112....dated 27. 1s atached he snd steht iw in case of any correspondence We . oa tie Oe (Md Adil Hossain) Fong a PLoueade a 2 AFTABHOSTE Prostar i AMU, ALIGARE cate FI. ac Copy To Applicame Mr. Md. Adil Hossain 2, Aftab Hotel Afiab Hall AMU. Aligarh. This isin reference to your application dated 28.4,2010 received through CAPIO/Deputy Registrar fetal, AMU vide this office R. No, 199/Proc, dated 30.04.2010 seeking informatio Q.Noot Wo. Q.Nou. . No.0. Q.No.0s ested information as per ths office resord are as underi- Copy of leter addressed tothe Vice-Chancellor (Two pages with different remark of vic.) alongwith 12 pages of signatures of the residents of V. M. Hall and one page ofthe photocopy of envelope total 15 pages enclosed which was received vide R. No, 143/VC. dated 21.04.2010 in the Vice-Chancellor’ office The proct office has received photocopy ove ssid letter from the Vice-Chancellor come, ‘his question has been transferred to the CPIO.V, M. Hell on 01.09.2010 wit request to provide information tothe applicant directly This question has been transferred to the CPIO, DSW and the Provost of Hall NRSC on 01.05.2010 with request to provide information tothe applicant direct The sentence “It has been further reported and alleged thatthe abovemention student on being rendered NRSC on his proved misconduct attempted to exert pressure on University Asthorities along with his supporters to ve ner” has been mentioned in the suspension order D, No.1S6I/Proe. dal 10 on the basls of a unanimous Jeter of the resents of V. M. Hal addressed to the Vice-Chancellor K. No, 432/VC. dated: 15.04.2010 for revoking the order of Mr. Afag Ahmad through which he was shifted from V. M. Hall to NRSC Mr. Afag Ahmad was found guilty in committing and violation of rule of the AMU Students Conduct & Discipline Act 1985 ke, 4 (i) Disrupting Administrative work & residential life ofthe Hall of residence & Rule 4 (i) Defacing the university Contda.2 Q.No.06 Q.No.os Encl: 17 Copy to 2 cPlo. Cony 0 RN. 163/VC This questio direct c ing to suspension of Mr. Afag 0 / Deputy Regist DSWIV.C. Office 3.042010 dul tor/DSW 549)Proc. dated 15, Ahmad, Ent, No. GD- ea PROCTOR OFFICE AGRA DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR HALL 37) ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY, ALIGARH Dated: 29.05.2010 Mr. Mohd. Adil Hossian 42, Aftab Hostel, AMU.. Aligarh, Please refer to your application No, 98/CPIO/F/10-11 28.04.10 under RTI Act 2005 seeking information on the points stated therein. The desired information as to question No. 3 & 7 are as under:~ 1. As per record there is no Rule/Ordinance/Regulation explicitly prohibiting making, of video elip of Hall without permission of the Provost. 2. ‘That if any students brings any outsider in the premises of Hall that prima facie amount to causing or colluding in the unauthorized entry in the Hall of residence and ithin the meaning of Rule 4 (VIII) of Students Discipline and Conduct Rule 1985 Hence said provision may be invoked against the erring student. However a student may be exempted from application of said rule, if any outsider has been brought inside premises of the Hall with the permission of Provost. A jonySte (Dr. Mohd. Wasim Ali) Provost/CPIO; Copy to: 1, CPIO (Legal) A.M.U., Aligath. 2. CPIO, DSW Proyost/CPIO 4 Aw

You might also like