You are on page 1of 2

SRNO Features Grinder JMeter

1 Usability It has a simple, Its UI is feature-rich


clean UI that and this product
clearly shows what has the Apache
is going on without branding. It was
trying to do too ultimately brought
much, and offers down by the
great power bugginess of its UI
though, as several
of its key monitors
gave incorrect
information or
simply didn't work
at all.

2 Scripting Jython allows It uses java


language complex scripts to scripting.
be developed much
more rapidly than
in more formal
languages like
Java, yet it can
access any Java
library or class
easily, allowing us
to re-use elements
of our existing
work.

3 Agent Grinder is the JMeter is good


manage weakest here. The here. Each agent is
ment properties files that a server that the
define how much controller can
load to apply must connect to at will in
be manually real-time. Test
deployed to all scripts are
agents. automatically sent
to each agent,
centralizing
management.

4 Technical While it's possible JMeter does not


level that a regular QA require developer
engineer could be skills to perform
used to run the basic tests in any
console and of the protocols it
perform some support out of the
testing, the tool is box.
really more aimed
at developers.
5 Ip The local IP JMeter is weak
spoofing address to bind the here.
outbound request
to can be specified
in the Jython
scripts.

6 Ability of The grinder does Limited.


Controlle very well here,
r to probably better
handle than Load Runner.
high
volume
of agent
data

7 Build test Cannot be done You can build a test


visually visually

8 Reportin Weak as compared Good as compared


g to JMeter with Grinder.

You might also like