I apologize for the English language that is not my native.

I know that fans of football bets

will understand the meaning of the book and will find valuable things about the strategy in
our fight against bookmakers even though this e-book is 2-years old now.

Dear fans of soccer betting

Entry into the third year of our relationship. For the past 24 months I have received not
hundreds but thousands of reviews on the Internet. Most letters contain gratitude - both for
specific soccer betting picks, and for regular schemes offered game. Some fans advise me in
one direction or another, for which I am grateful to them. There are many questions, including
those to which I have already answered your site or personal letters. I because it is not
possible to write to everyone individually, use the start of the section "Forecasts for 2009 to
share some of observations which will be important in the way we play in each of the
upcoming editions.

Apart from betting on certain chaotic matches, it is worth paying attention to two types of
game - by doubling the bet in singles and through combinations.

1. PLAYING WITH DOUBLING THE STAKE.

This method of participation was widespread a few years ago when the circulation of
“Eurofootball”(Bulgarian offline bookie) had only five or six singles or "Stars". Singles is a
game that does not need to combine with others, and we, under the terms of the bookmaker, to
play alone. This is important because the more matches there are in a bet, the more likely you
are to lose. We strive to play as much as possible simple guided us - either spontaneously, it
was realized - to "stars."
For several years, almost every game is "Star”(could be played without necessity to be
combined with other matches) However, now we can play with doubling as a select choice of
us sign a series of meetings in order to accumulate the stake until the desired character out. It
is important that coefficients be over 2.00 so that we make a profit.
I've played with the smallest and the largest, and the average coefficient, for example to
match that ratio is 2.20 to 1 for X - 2.80, for 2 to 2.40. The highest profits are when doubling
the highest sign. Let's say we have today pledged € 10 for the coefficient 2.80, but the sign
does not go. Tomorrow I bet 20 still not out on the third day's play with 40 and miss. We
invested a cumulative 10 20 40 = 70 Euros and receive 2.80 . 40 = 112, or our profit is 42
Euros. If we doubled the smallest sign and we got it as in the previous example, the third time,
revenue is 2.20 . 40 = 88 Euros, while profit is 18 Euros.
This way the game looks tempting, but in its purest form it is only apparent. You'll see it,
looking statistics matches the smallest sign that I made throughout 2008. The table below we
see which way out of the smallest character in the series of matches for the doubling and the
number of exits for the road. For example, the following matches from me the smallest sign
have gone a total of 1473 times. In 636 of cases this sign is out again, which for purposes of
analysis called exit from the first time, i.e. without a break from muff to muff. In 354 of the
cases the sign has not come immediately, i.e. the first of a series of games, but came out the
second time. And so on.
 Table 1

The Lowest Coefficient

How many times How many times Percent Appears with Percent with
till it appears it appears accumulation accumulation
1 636 43 % 636 43 %
2 354 24 % 990 67 %
3 184 12 % 1174 80 %
4 129 9% 1303 88 %
5 82 5% 1385 94 %
6 37 2% 1422 96 %
7 19 1% 1441 98 %
8 18 1% 1459 99 %
9 19
10 3
11 1
12 1

Total appears 1473

We see that in 88% of cases mark out the fourth time in 94% - the fifth in 96 percent - the
sixth. This enticed us that even the sixth time to double, making a pledge to build 10 +20 +40
+80 +160 +320 = 630 euro, in most cases it will be profitable. But what about when the sign
out of the 9 th, 10 th or 12 th right time? In my personal'm betting doubling to 10 th time, but
for most players this means sure bankruptcy.
The danger becomes even clearer from

Table 2

Opportunities doubling the smallest coefficient

On what Single bet Number of bets Wager Coef. Number of Gain
time appear appears
1 10 евро 1473 14730 2,2 636 13992
2 20 837 16740 2,2 354 15576
3 40 483 19320 2,2 184 16192
4 80 299 23920 2,2 129 22704
Etc.

As already mentioned, observed by me in meetings at least mark out 1473 times. Starting
doubling as it exits, even the first step - leaving the first time - have a total cost of 14,730
Euros, while total revenue - € 13,992, ie We are at a loss. The excess of expenditure over
revenue becomes more sensitive the next steps.
A similar picture with tripling the bet.

Table 3

Opportunities for tripling the smallest coefficient

On what Single bet Number of bets Wager Coef. Number of Gain

time appear appeas
1 10 евро 1473 14730 2,2 636 13992
2 30 837 25110 2,2 354 23364
3 90 483 43470 2,2 184 36432
4 270 299 80730 2,2 129 76626
Etc.

Here the losses are even greater.

Illusion of easy profits are up and playing with a doubling of the biggest sign. Here are
statistics on meetings observed by me in 2008.

Table 4

The Highest Coefficient

On what time Number of appears Percent Appears with Percent with

appear accumulation accumulation
1 310 30 % 310 30 %
2 203 20 5 513 50 %
3 136 13 % 649 64 %
4 103 10 % 752 74 %
5 86 8% 838 82 %
6 51 5% 889 88 %
7 34 3% 923 91 %
8 32 3% 955 94 %
9 23 2% 978 96 %
10 13 1% 991 98 %
11 6 997 98 %
12 4 1001 99 %
13 2
14 3
15 3
16 3
17 0
18 1
19 2
25 1

Total number of appears 1016

And here we could say that once in 80-90 percent of cases the biggest coefficient is out after
the fifth and sixth time we can play safely and successfully. But if you it is out at the 12 th or
25 th time? Accumulations are so great that hardly anyone can afford them. The table below
suggests this.

Table 5

Opportunities doubling the biggest coefficient

On what Single bet Number of bets Wager Coef. Number of Gain

time appears
1 10 евро 1016 10160 2,8 310 8680
2 20 706 14120 2,8 203 11368
3 40 503 20120 2,8 136 15232
4 80 367 29360 2,8 103 23072
Etc.

Urge that the losses are significant. Even greater when we are tripling the bet.

Table 6
 Opportunities for tripling the highest coefficient

On what Single bet Number of Wager Coef. Number of Gain

time bets appears(outcomes)
1 10 евро 1016 10160 2,8 310 8680
2 30 706 21180 2,8 203 17052
3 90 503 45270 2,8 136 34272
4 270 367 99090 2,8 103 77868
Etc.

Better are the possibilities if we start to double not as it exits, but after the fifth time, ie after
failing to come up four times in a row, etc.

Table 7

Opportunities doubling the lowest coefficient from the fifth time on

On what Single bet Number of Wager Coef. Number of Gain

time bets outcomes(hits)
5 10 евро 170 1700 2,2 82 1804
6 40 88 3520 2,2 37 3256
7 150 51 7650 2,2 19 6270
8 300 32 9600 2,2 18 11880
9 600 14 8400 2,2 9 11880
10 1200 5 6000 2,2 3 7920
11 2400 2 4800 2,2 1 5280
12 4800 1 4800 2,2 1 10560
Total 46470 58850

Total profit 12380

We see that in this kind of game profits within a year was decent. You already may sound
trite, but here our success is uncertain. Because the bookmaker has many opportunities to our
counter - as download rates, making singles and even triples blocking bet on certain games.
Problem is betting larger sums: by going to the points you want to play with more than
thousand, call headquarters, asking for permission, if not get it, you must break the pledge of
smaller amounts and walk around several points, and always have time for that.

Yet, while the smallest sign makes sense to begin the first time, and in the middle - the
fourth, fifth and sixth time in the highest coefficient that does not help. (As you can see, do
not give statistics on the average mark, since there are things worse)

Table 8

Opportunities doubling the biggest coefficient after the fifth time

On what Single bet Number of Wager Coef. Number of Gain

consecutive bets appears
5 10 евро 264 2640 2,8 86 2408
6 20 178 3560 2,8 51 2856
7 40 127 5080 2,8 34 3808
8 80 93 7440 2,8 32 7168
9 160 61 9760 2,8 23 10304
10 320 38 12160 2,8 13 11648
11 640 25 16000 2,8 6 10756
12 1280 19 24320 2,8 4 14336
Total 80960 63284

Total loss 17676

Written here does not mean we should abandon the game with a doubling of the stakes.
Rather, this is the surest way to not only their money back, but to win. Of particular
importance, however, are some details in the statistics that will afford not to publish because
they are my know-how. Some of them will, however, reflected on the pattern for the game,
which will propose in 2009, and those who rely on the estimates, will win.

I've seen in print media and online reviews on raw amounts propose to bet within a year. For
example in Table 7 shows that to win with the proposed schedule of play total 58,850 Euros
must bet 46,470. Some authors think that these 46,470 Euros must have at the beginning of
the year, resent what large sums are played and even make suggestions of money laundering.
Actually, who knows, knows that under the game that I propose is sufficiently early in the
year to start with 300-400 euro. Part of winning is being shot again and gradually leads to the
total cost and total profits up to 12 months.
Of course, my clear is that for many, and this initial amount is impossible. So many times
I've written online, I'll say now, at the beginning of another year of our relationship that can
not pledge scheme 10-20-40-80 etc. EUR may do so in the sequence 1-2-4-8, etc. or example,
5-10-20-40, etc. Profits will be lower, but still it is better to earn less than nothing.

• 2. PLAYING WITH COMBINATIONS

(NOTE: WE WILL USE THIS STRATEGY MUCH LESS FREQUENTLY)

Noticed that some days come true 60-70-80 percent of my soccer betting picks, many fans
write to me why not to play games in combos and earn much more than what they announce
on the site. They are completely done. I and many of those who are interested in my picks,
are playing using combinations. Here, however, unless statistics are needed and football
knowledge and the inevitable dose of chance. Therefore, each making the odds alone, I give
only the base.

Here are some of the schemes, which combine many of my predictions site visitors:

Full combine 5 of my estimates of 3, 4 and 5 characters. Playing with the lowest mark by a
factor of 2.20 and bet € 10 column. The total cost is 16 columns x 10 Euros = 160 Euros.
Opportunities for profit are the following:

Table 9
5 games to 3, 4 and 5 hit

Number of hits Gain

3 106,48
4 660,18
5 2751,44

Total wager 160

When 3 friends are at a loss, but at 4 and 5 have hit a bad profit forecasts.

Full combined 6 of projections 4, 5 and 6 characters. Playing with the lowest mark by a
factor of 2.20 and bet € 10 column. The total cost is 22 columns x 10 Euros = 220 Euros.
Opportunities for profit are the following:

Table 10

6 games at 4, 5 и 6 hits

Number of hits Gain

4 234,26
5 1686,64
6 7739,82
Total wager 220

Here we have success at first step - in 4 known and lucrative incomes at 5 and 6 struck
forecasts.

You should know however, that in this way the combination is necessary to have more
resources because it is quite possible to not know enough meetings several days in a row. For
example, if we play 6 Meetings of 4, 5 and 6 known and strive to 5 friends, and if the five
characters go on the seventh day, we would bet 1540 Euros and will have revenue 1686.64.
However, if the five characters come until the eighth day, will now have a loss.

For most fans is more sensible to combine my forecasts in one of two ways:

Table11:

Game 1 1 Х 1 1 1
Game 2 1 1 Х 1 1
Game 3 1 1 1 Х 1
Game 4 1 1 1 1 Х
Coefficient 23,4 29,8 29,8 29,8 29,8
Wager 40 2 2 2 2
Gain 936 59 59 59 59

Total wager 48

Coefficients are 2.20 for 1 and for X - 2.80. Here are a plus, and that column to come. The
problem is that there are few cases that go more than one cross, and then we are at a loss.
Therefore, most recommended version of me is as follows:

Table 12

Game 1 1 Х 1 1 1
Game 2 1 Х Х 1
Game 3 1 Х 1
Game 4 1 Х
Coefficient 23,4 2,8 6,2 13,5 29,8
Wager 40 45 20 10 5
Gain 936 126 132 135 149

Total wager 120

Coefficients are 2.20 for 1 and for X - 2.80. As crosses to go, there are a plus. It is better that
way - with safe return of the pledge, to await a few familiar characters than as in Tables 9 and
10. Against the emergence of a third character - in this case pair, generally are powerless. We
can do barbs and the third character, but will receive as much as would bet that renders this
effort. In Table 12, however, he first went Hicks, and then - the third place, we will not be
profitable, but will return your money, which is the first task in the betting.

I could recommend several ways to combine forecasts beyond that post. One of them is as
in Table 11, but here we select four meetings with the coefficient for the smallest sign around
1.40. Stake of 10 per column:

Table 13

Game 1 1 Х 1 1 1
Game2 1 1 Х 1 1
Game 3 1 1 1 Х 1
Game 4 1 1 1 1 Х
Coefficient 3,84 9,6 9,6 9,6 9,6
Wager 50 10 10 10 10
Gain 192 96 96 96 96

Total wager 90

This game is proper for fans with less experience. Matches with relatively low coefficient for
the smallest sign, which makes the release of more than one X, not to mention the third
character, unlikely. These are usually matches of the big teams in European football.

Fans with more practice can try the same scheme but with a slightly higher rate for the
lowest coefficient - about 1,60.

Table 14

Game 1 1 Х 1 1 1
Game 2 1 1 Х 1 1
Game 3 1 1 1 Х 1
Game 4 1 1 1 1 Х
Coefficient 6,55 13,1 13,1 13,1 13,1
Wager 50 6 6 6 6
Gain 327,50 78 78 78 78
Total wager 74

Revenue here is decent - more than four times the bet. The probability of exit of the second
X or third place - in this case pair is not large.

Recommend one of his favorite combinations resemble those of Table 12:

Table 15

Game 1 1 Х 1 1 1 1
Game 2 1 Х 1 1 1
Game 3 1 Х 1 1
Game 4 1 Х 1
Game 5 1 Х
Coefficient 27,28 2,8 6,2 13,6 34,1 54,5
Wager 50 50 23 10 4 3
Gain 1364 140 142,60 136 136,40 163,50

Total wager 140

“1”s in the first three games of this scheme is a factor 2.20 and “X”s - 2.80. In the fifth game
“1” is 1.60, and X - 3,20.
Profits if hit the five units is seductive and practical in each of the contras to return the
money.

Here's another combination that not only play with gusto, but with success. The first three
games choose from meetings of the European grandees with their victory factor about 1.40
and about equal - about 3.50. For each of the four slip these games are hard. Combine them
with five games of the estimates give, at odds of lowest mark 2.20, using the system for
combining part № 401-5 meetings for a couple with three friends:

Table 16

Game 1 1 fixed Х fixed 1 fixed 1 fixed

Game 2 1 fixed 1 fixed Х fixed 1 fixed
Game 3 1 fixed 1 fixed 1 fixed Х fixed
Coefficient 2,74 6,86 6,86 6,86
Each column is combined with system № 401
Coef. With 13,26 33,2 33,2 33,2
accumulation
Wager 4х10=40 4х2=8 4х2=8 4х2=8
Gain at number of hits from the system
3 hits - 1 profit 132,60 66 66 66
4 hits - 2 profit 264 132 132 132
5 hits - 4 profit 528 264 264 264

Total wager 64

The combination makes profit in less than a cross of the first three games and at least three
known from five matches by a factor of 2.20 System № 401.
He fears that in the selected its first three matches a high risk “X”s have more than one can
play only five matches by my estimates, relying on in each of the smallest sign of a
coefficient 2.20, taking them into the system part and combine № 401 bet 10 per each of the
four columns. Its total cost will be 40 Euros, at 3 known revenue will be € 48.40, 4 hit - 96
Euros, and in five known characters - 192 Euros.

Here's another one of my favorite schemes to play. Pick three relatively controversial game,
which are likely one team to come out victorious is more, but not off and tie. Looking for a
win ratio of preferred team would be around 1.80, therefore X is usually 2.95. Most
importantly, the matches are on different days or at least at different times with sufficient time
between the end of one and beginning of the next to be able to counter. Along with the main
column of three units play in another sheet and a cross for the first counter. If the first match
out cross, we returned his money and completing their participation. If a unit, we counter with
a cross at the second meeting with the higher stake than the first cross. If the result is equal,
closing their participation, we pledged to return. If a second game unit, we counter with a
cross at the third summit with a pledge of more than the second counter. If you cross out, we
get their money back, if a unit, we win:

Table 17

Game Main column Counter 1 Counter 2 Counter 3

Game 1 1 - 1,80 Х - 2,95
Game 2 1 - 1,80 Х - 2,95
Game 3 1 - 1,80 Х - 2,95
Coefficient 5,80 2,95 295 2,95
Wager 50 25 35 60
Wager with 50 75 110 170
accumulation
Gain 290 73,75 103,25 177
We see that if you need play all three “contras” will have wagered 170 Euros with
accumulation, if familiar characters in the main column will have revenue € 290. At any stage
a “X” appears, your money back, and if “X” comes, of course, lose.

And a combination that brings good revenue:

Table 18

Game Main column Counter 1 Counter 2 Counter 3

Game 1 1 fixed - 1,60 Х - 3,20 1 fixed - 1,60 1 fixed - 1,60
Game 2 1 fixed - 1,60 1 fixed - 1,60 Х - 3,20 1 fixed - 1,60
Game 3 1 fixed - 1,60 1 fixed - 1,60 1 fixed - 1,60 Х - 3,20
Game 4 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80
Game 5 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80
Game 6 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80
Game 7 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80 Х - 2,80
Game 8 Х - 2,80
Coefficient 90 64 64 64
Wager 10 х 5 = 50 10х3=30 10х3=30 10х3=30
Min. gain 450 192 192 192

Total wager 110

In the main column the first three games are “firm” with a coefficient for the favorite to win
around 1,60. In matches from № 4 to № 8 to bet “X”s in a full combination of threes. This
makes 10 columns. If you hit the “firms” and know the three “X”’s, we have income of €
450. If you hit more “X”s, revenue swells considerably. We use contras to make sure we will
not lose money in case we fail to hit some of the “firms. This “X”, however, does not play
“firm”, but we include it in combination to fully combine three of five matches. And since
“X”s are six , “the “X” from № 8 dropped from the combination. Contras not only returned
the money, but when we have known more than three “X”s, it even gives a profits.

Once you have read my "bible", we can start new forecasts for 2009. I hope it to be
successful!

NOTE!

“firm” or “fixed” – a match that is not combined with another one and consequently presents
in all columns so if we fail to hit, then the gain of the column or combination is 0.

“contra” or “counter” – a match we bet on in order to avoid loss if we fail to hit the main
match
“accumulation” - the total sum of bets or coefficients etc.(Ex. Accumulation of 2.20, 4.00 and
8,40 is 14.60).

Krasimir Georgiev