You are on page 1of 21

CONTEXTUAL FACTORS IN HRS

DESIGNING

In designing a HRS, it is necessary to take


into account several factors significant to the
organisation.
There cannot be one standard design of HRS.

Organisations in the same country differ on


various dimensions, which should be taken into
account while developing a design of HRS.

1
CONTEXTUAL FACTORS IN
HRS DESIGNING
• The most relevant context for HRD is the
business environment.
• The culture (both societal & organisational)
• Finally,
– The business environment
– Organisational characteristics
– Organisational culture

2
THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
• Increasing Competition with external companies (Foreign
Countries)
• Decreasing Government control & subsidies (This results in
sharp rise of prices of several products)
• Creating Competent, Impatient, & Demanding Employees.
• Dealing with Conscious & Demanding Customers.
• Increasing Unemployment as well as Unemployability is
downsizing.
• Flattening Structures – Dehierarchisation is also necessary
to speed decision making, and giving higher satisfaction to
the employees.
3
THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
• Increasing Decentralization & Delegation – some
organisations are attempting to give autonomy to workers for
decision making. This trend is likely to increase.
• Increasing Organisational Mortality (death rate) - with
increasing competition & demanding customers, several
units are likely to close down, because they would not be
able to meet such demands. This is an interesting
challenging reality for HRD to manage.
• Resistance to Radical Change – Companies which have
tried out unconventional approaches (AV Birla Group,
Reliance, Infosys, even Tatas) have emerged as winners.

4
ORGANISATION CONTEXT
• Each orgn. Develops an identity.
• It has a history & a tradition.
• Its size & the field of operation makes it unique.
• Its members may have some preferences &
commitments.
• All such factors are important & need to be taken
into consideration while designing HRS
• So for this we need
– Orgn. Characteristics & Culture
5
ORGANISATIONAL
CHARACTERISITCS
• SIZE
– The size of an organisation will be an important
consideration for the design.
– An orgn which is comparatively small may combine several
functions into one, whereas an organisation which is fairly
large, may require specialized functions within the HRS
• TECHNOLOGY
– The type of work being done in the orgn & the tech followed
does influence the design of the HRS.
– Eg: universities & other educational institutions may
emphasize some components of HRS much more than
others. Or, the government system may not contain some
components. 6
ORGANISATIONAL
CHARACTERISITCS
• SKILL LEVELS
– Organ’s differ in the level of their sophistication of workers.
Some orgn have high levels of skills of people, whereas in
others, the levels may be low.
– If the orgn has had no experience at all of appraisal , special
attention may be paid to introducing simple appraisal methods,
followed by a more sophisticated system.
• ORGANISATION SUPPORT
– If there is enough respect for HRS, it can be introduced at a very
high level, which will help in the proper implementation of the
system.
– On the other hand, if the respect is low, the system may not get
its due credibility., & therefore some work needs to be done for
such organisations. 7
ORGANISATIONAL
CHARACTERISITCS
• AVAILABILITY OF OUTSIDE HELP
– Finally, one factor which may be considered while designing any
system is whether ‘expert help’ is available to the orgn from
outside.
– If such help is available, the sub-systems introduced can be
monitored properly, and outside consultation can be sought.
• EXISTING ARRANGEMENTS
– Different orgns have different tradition.
– In some orgns, personnel function may alreasy include some
aspects like general admn, while in others, it may have other
special features.
– Similarly, some functions may not be in the personnel & may form
part of the role of the company secretary. Such special features will
certainly influence the design of some aspects of HRS 8
What is Organizational Culture?

• A system of meaning shared by the


organization’s members

• Cultural values are collective beliefs,


assumptions, and feelings about what
things are good, normal, rational,
valuable, etc.
Culture’s Overall Function
• Culture is the social glue that helps to hold
an organization together by providing
appropriate standards for what employees
should say or do.
• An optimum level of “Development Climate”
is essential for facilitating HRD. Such a
climate is characterized as consisting of the
following characteristics i.e. known as
OCTAPACE :
Culture’s Overall Function
• An optimum level of “Development Climate”
is essential for facilitating HRD.
• The most important aspect of organisational
culture are the values it practices.
• Eight values may be examined to develop
the profile of an organisational culture:
• OCTAPACE
OCTAPACE
Openness
• Employees feel free to express their ideas & the organization is willing to take
risks & experiment with new ideas & new ways of doing things.
• The degree of openness of the organization is an important factor in
determining the nature of various dimensions of HRD being designed.

Confrontation (A bold challenge)


• Employees face the problems & work jointly with others concerned to find its
solution.
• They face the issues squarely without hiding them or avoiding them for fear
of hurting each other.

12
OCTAPACE
Trust
• A minimum level of trust may be deemed necessary for
the introduction of the performance appraisal system
and other elements of HRD.
• Employees department & groups trust each other & can
be relied (trust) upon to ‘do’ whatever they say they will.

Authenticity
• Authenticity is the value underlying trust.
• It is the willingness of a person to acknowledge the
feelings he/she has, and accept himself/herself as well
as others who relate to him/her as persons. 13
OCTAPACE
Pro-activity (actively thinking in advance)
• Employees are action – oriented, willing to take
initiative & show a high degree of Pro-activity.
• They anticipate issues and act or respond to the
needs of the future.
Autonomy
• Autonomy is the willingness to use power without
fear, and helping others to do the same.
• Employees have some freedom to act
independently within the boundaries imposed by
their role/job
14
OCTAPACE
Collaboration
• Collaboration involves working together and using one
another’s strength for a common cause.
• Individuals, instead of solving their problems by
themselves, share their concerns with one another &
prepare strategies, work out plans of action, & implement
them together.

Experimenting
• Experimenting as a value emphasizes the importance
given to innovation and trying out new ways of dealing
with problems in the organization. 15
PRINCIPLES OF DESIGNING HRS

• FOCUS OF THE SYSTEM

• STRUCTURE OF THE SYSTEM

• FUNCTIONS OF THE SYSTEM

16
FOCUS OF THE SYSTEM
• Focus on Enabling Capabilities
– Enabling means development of HR, development of total orgl. health,
improvement of problem solving capability, diagnostic ability (to solve
problems quickly), open system(maxi. Commitment of employees)
• Balancing Adaption To And Changing Organisational Culture
– There is no standard form of HRS, it should be designed based on nature &
culture of an orgn.
• Attention to the Contextual Factors
– Culture & tradition, size, technology, levels of existing skills available support
for the function, availability of outside help
• Building Linkages With Other Functions
– Like long range corporate planning, with marketing, finance & production etc.,.
• Balancing Specialization And Diffusion Of The Function
– Since HRS is a specialized function should not result in lack of involvement.
Since action is the sole responsibility of the line people.
17
STRUCTURE OF THE
SYSTEM
• Establishing the Identity
– In some orgn. One of the top persons takes the responsibility of this function, in
addition to his own responsibility. This is wrong practice. Multiple responsibility
produce several kinds of conflict.
• Ensuring Respectability for the function
– In many co’s HR function does not have much credibility for several reasons,
and considered at a very low and this is ineffective. For this reason it should be
in very high level in the orgn to increase visibility & its usefulness.
• Balancing Differentiation & Integration
– Personnel administration, orgn development and training & IR : these 3 needs
clear identity. Time is the differentiation between these 3 & inter linkages
between these 3 are integration and hence requires mutual support.
• Functional Designations For The Roles
– A combination of managerial & functional designations can achieve this very
well. Managerial designation should reflect thro the level of responsibility.
Importance should also be given to functional responsibility in the designations.
18
STRUCTURE OF THE
SYSTEM
• Use of Linkages Mechanisms
– Semi permanent & temporary systems serve a useful purpose in this
regard. Standing committees for various purposes (with membership from
various parts, levels & systems of the orgn), task groups & ad hoc
committees for specific time bound tasks are egs. for these mechanisms.

• Use of Monitoring Mechanisms


– A systematic monitoring mechanism is needed to review the progress and
level of effectiveness of the system. A thorough annual review may be very
useful, a more detailed system appraisal in every three yrs may also help in
reviewing & replanning.

19
FUNCTIONS OF THE SYSTEM
• Building Feedback & Reinforcing Mechanisms
– Reinforcement means Strengthen and support with rewards. Eg. Performance
& potential appraisal should provide the necessary leads for training. While
OD & OD programmes may provide the necessary leads for work redesigning.
• Balancing Quantification & Qualitative Decisions
– While promoting people, various available quantitative data and even a print
out by a computer may be useful. These may be used as necessary inputs,
but some other factors which cannot be quantified will have to be taken into
consideration while taking the decision. Such a balancing is necessary.
• Balancing Internal & External Help
– Development of both internal & external expertise and resources is necessary
in a judicious blend.

20
FUNCTIONS OF THE SYSTEM
• Planning Evolution Of The Function
– HRS cannot be established overnight in an orgn.
Different aspects can be introduced at different
stages depending on the stage, size, &
sophistication of the orgn.
• Geographical phasing
• Vertical phasing (creation of sub systems)
• Functional phasing (sub system for various other
functions)
• Sophistication phasing ( simpler forms of sub system)

21

You might also like