Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com/commentary/comments/1461662
CharitablePlanning.com
Home > Commentary > Current Events > Patent Issued for Contribuon of Exempt Bonds to CRAT
Summary
The Patent Office issued a patent to a financial consultant for a strategy of selling tax‐exempt bonds to selected investors, who would
then place the bonds into CRATs for the ulmate benefit of the issuing charity.
Extended Summary
The applicaon was filed more than seven years ago by Leigh S. Fultz, the managing principal of a financial consulng firm called The
Cambridge Companies. In broad strokes, the patented method consists of the following steps:
The plan also contemplates that the investor would use the annuity payout from the CRAT to fund an ILIT to replace the assets gi6 to the
CRAT.
CPC Commentary
The patented strategy uses a computer to select potenal investors from a database, but otherwise consists of combining exisng tax
planning strategies in straigh8orward ways. Evidently, the involvement of a computer meets the requirement that a set of otherwise
abstract ideas be ed to a machine to be patentable. The patent le6 the door open for others to use Mr. Fultz's method, minus the
computerized selecon of investors.
It is unfortunate that the Patent Office is connuing to issue such patents while Bilski, which was recently argued before the Supreme
Court, is sll pending (see our commentary earlier this year of June 3, July 10, and August 14).
As presently marketed, the patented strategy may be subject to IRS disclosure requirements. The plan requires a parcipang charity, and
possibly individual investors, to sign nondisclosure agreements. However, Regs require a taxpayer to report any transacon with respect
to which either:
1. the taxpayer has paid a fee of at least $50,000 to an advisor (or $250,000 if the taxpayer is a corporaon) and has agreed not to
disclose the tax strategy to others; or
2. the advisor's fee is conngent or refundable in whole or in part if the tax treatment of the strategy is not sustained.
For this purpose, "fees" may include not only fees for access to the strategy itself, but also fees (i) for advice in structuring and
implemenng the transacons, (ii) for documenng the transacons, and (iii) for return preparaon services in reporng the transacon,
to the extent return preparaon fees are unreasonable in light of the facts and circumstances. It is not clear whether the insurance
commissions involved in the ILIT would be within the definion, but the Reg treats as fees "consideraon in whatever form paid."
If the transacon falls within the descripon of category #1 or #2 above, another Reg requires a "material advisor" to maintain a list of
parcipants, which is subject to disclosure to the IRS on demand.
Relevant Documents
08‐964 11/13/09
Highlights CPC Commentary: Patent Sought for Method of Segregang UBTI 7/10/09
07‐1130 6/2/09
1 of 2 1/4/2011 8:39 AM
Patent Issued for Contribution of Exempt Bonds to CRAT https://charitableplanning.com/commentary/comments/1461662
10/5/06
Reg. Sec. 301.6112‐1: Requirement to prepare, maintain, and furnish lists with respect to potenally abusive tax shelters.
Reg. Sec. 1.6011‐4: Requirement of statement disclosing parcipaon in certain transacons by taxpayers. 10/5/06
We welcome your input. If you found this event useful, have a suggestion, or would like to share you opinion on the subject, please visit our feedback
form.
2 of 2 1/4/2011 8:39 AM