Input data: P  25000 6 R  .0255 L  0.

300
q  3 10

9 9   0.25
9 E2  5 10 G  2.6 10
E1  236 10
6 6 6 6
6 Yt  41 10 Xc  689 10 Yc  117 10 S  69 10
Strengths Xt  380010


 0.00025
Layups  45 
0.00025
t  
75  tt ( n t)  tt  0
    0.00025 for i  1  n
 45   0.00025 t0  tt ( 4 t)
 75    tt  tt  t
  i

Laminate Analysis

2 E2 T( )  s  sin (  deg )
Q( E1E2G)  c  1   
E1 c  cos (  deg )
  E2
0 
E1  c2 s 2 2 c s 
  
c c
   2 2 
  E2 E2  s c 2 c s 
0
 c c   c s c s c2  s 2 
   
 0 0 G

0 0 0
A ( n  t)  A   0 0 0 
 
0 0 0
Q  Q( E1E2G)
for i  1  n
Ti  T   i
T
A  A  t  Ti Q Ti
i

Maximum stress failure criterion:


1
FMS(  Xt Xc YtYcS)  w  if   0
1 Xt 1


1
w  if   0
1 Xc 1


2
w  if   0
2 Yt 2


2
w  if   0
2 Yc 2


3
w 
3 S
w
Laminate analysis:
Q0  Q( E1E2G) A  A ( 4  t) a  A
1
 1
T  T   2
T  T 

Load case 1: Axial compression:

 P   1.560343 105 
2  R    1.560343 108 
N1    N1   0  N1  
 0  x1 
  t0 x1   0 
 0   0   
 0 
 0.018275 
x1  a N1  
x1   2.775555 10 3 
 0.018839 
 

x1  L
3 1
Angle of twist:    deg   12.698637
R

Lamina 1:

 1.105926 10 3 
T    2.863086 108 
  T  x1
  
0.019945 
  1.012401 108 

  Q0 
 
 0.0155   
 4.029883 107 
 

 2.340732 108 
 
T   1.534755 108 

 
 9.253424 107   0.415542
 
FMS(  Xt Xc YtYcS)   0.8653 
 
 0.584041

Lamina 2:

 8.95874 10 4 
T    1.842371 108 
  T  x1
   0.021947   
  1.087568 10 

  Q0  8
 3
 8.56511 10   
 2.226929 107 
 
 7.799532 107 
 
T   1.534755 108 

 
 9.253424 107   0.048483
 
FMS(  Xt Xc YtYcS)   0.929546
 
 0.322743
Load case 2: Internal Pressure

 1
 q  R   3.825 107 
2
 3.825 104   
N2      N2
x2  x2   7 
 q R  N2   4  t0 7.65  10
 
7.65  10  
0    0 
 0 
 5.840722 10 3 
 
x2  a N2 x2  2.305678 10 
  3
 
 8.085749 10 3 
 

 3.032512 10 5   1.732476 107 

Lamina 1    
  T  x2
T
  8.116074 10 
  3   Q0    4.067213 10 
 7
   
 3.535044 10 3   9.191115 106 
   
 3.818956 107 
 
T   1.980733 107 
  4.559148 10 3 
   
FMS(  Xt Xc YtYcS)   0.992003 
 1.167369 107 
   
 0.133205 

Lamina 2

 5.210434 10 4 
   1.326736 108 
T    
  7.625356 10 3
  3.88295 10 

  T  x2 7
    Q0 
 5.234942 10 3   
   1.361085 107 
 
 3.831044 107 
 
 0.034914
T   1.331927 108 

  FMS(  Xt Xc YtYcS)   0.947061
 1.167369 107   
   0.197259

Effective elastic properties of the laminate

1 10
1 9 Ey  Ey  4.706875 10
Ex  Ex  8.538078 10 t0 a
t0 a 2 2
1 1
a a
1 2 1 2
x y 
a a
1 1 2 2
 x1
Shortening 3 1 3
  x1  L   5.482531 10  L  5.482531 10
1 Ex

Column buckling ( R  t0) 4  R4 8 2 I

I    I  5.523705 10 Pcr    Ex
4 2
L
4
Pcr  5.171873 10

Shell buckling
2
t0  Ex Ey 4
Nx  Pcr  Nx 2   R Pcr  7.783921 10
R 3 ( 1  xy
 )

Tube twist angle due to axial compression P as function of 2 winding angles

0 0 0
TA (  )  A   0 0 0 
 
0 0 0
Q  Q( E1E2G)
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
for i  1  4
Ti  T   i
T
A  A  t  Ti Q Ti
i
1
aA
L 1
N1  a   deg
1 1 3 R

Tube twist angle due to axial compression as function of one of the 2 winding angles while the other
is fixed

  7574 75 gm75( )  TA ( 45) gp75( )  TA ( 45)

TA

TA
 15

10

gm75( )
0
gp75( )

5

 10

 15
 75  62.5  50  37.5  25  12.5 0 12.5 25 37.5 50 62.5 75
