Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Phase 0.0 Project Initiation Phase 1.0 Plan and Define Project Phase 2.0 Product Design and Development Phase 3.0 Process Design and Development Phase 4.0 Product and Process Validation Phase 5.0 Feedback, Assessment and Corrective Actions Project Controlling and other supporting PDS processes
MR0 PS0
MR1 PS1
MR2 PS2
MR3 PS3
MR4 PS4
MR5
Go / No-Go
Design Freeze
Run@Rate
Final Report
Management Review
Phase Sign-Off
Final Report
High Site
Medium Technology
Low Process
Date: Part Number: Part Name: Specification / Drawings No: Version: Plant:
Tel/Mobile No E-mail
Company / Responsibility
APQP Project Adviser Plant Project Team Leader Chief Engineer (R & D) Project Team Member (Maintenance) Project Team Member (Purchasing) Project Team Member (Finance) Project Team Member (Sales) Project Team Member (Production Operator) Project Team Member (Quality) Project Team Member (Production Supervisor/Team Leader)
Material Required Date Quantity Special Characteristics Comments
APQP Elements
G Y R
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Required Form
63423512.xls.XLS
Report No.
Date:
Attendees (Supplier)
Department
Attendees (LT)
Department
2010
J Prototype Programme Key Dates Phase 0.0 Project Initiation 0.1 Request for Quotation (RFQ) Registration 0.2 Quotation Kick-Off and Team Setup
Phase 0.0
2011
Sun Clause A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Next APQP Date
Functional Job 1
Status
Action Required
0.3 Formulation of Quote 0.4 FEP plus & Customer Specific Quote 0.5 Handover Quote 0.6 Phase 0 Gate Review & Sign Off
1.1 Project Kick-Off and Set Up Project Folder 1.2 Defrine Financial Baseline 1.3 Refine Preliminary Design Chacteristics 1.4 Refine Preliminary Process Flow and Manufacturing Facilities 1.5 Preliminary Tooling and Manufacturing Facilities Plan 1.6 Corrective Actions 1.7 Phase 1 Gate Review & Sign Off 2.1 DFMEA 2.2 DFMA
2.3 Preliminary PFMEA 2.4 DVP & R 2.5 CAD Model & Simulations 2.6 "Make or Buy" Evaluation - Design Review (Model and Drawing) 2.7 Assessment and Selection of Suppliers 2.8 Prototype Control Plan 2.9 Production Process Flow Chart 2.10 Pfrototype Construction and Review 2.11 Engineering Drawings - Design Review (Design Freeze) 2.12 Datebase 2.13 Corrective Actions 2.14 Phase 2 Gate Review & Sign Off
Phase 3.0 Process Design & Development 3.1 PFMEA 3.2 Manufacturing Facility Design
Phase 3.0 Process Design & Development 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 3.11 3.12 3.13 3.14
3.3 Pre-Launch Control Plan 3.4 Measurement Systems Analysis Plan 3.5 Production Equipment Safety 3.6 Process Instructions and Training Plan 3.7 Manufacturing Facility Design Approval 3.8 Tool Design and Tool FMEA 3.9 Verification of Tool Bill of Parts 3.10 Verification of Part Dimensions 3.11 Verification of Tool Functionality Tool Design Review 3.12 Packaging Specification 3.13 Corrective Actions 3.14 Phase 3 Gate Review & Sign Off
Phase 4.0 Product & Process Validation 4.1 Gauge R & R 4.2 Gauge Certification and Registration
Phase 4.0 Product & Process Validation 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.1 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14
4.3 Training Builds 4.4 Tool Tryout 4.5 Tool Life Deviation 4.6 Production Approval for Tool & Manufacturing Facilities 4.7 DVP & R Concluded 4.8 Production Control Plan 4.9 Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) 4.10 Internal Run@Rate 4.11 Production System Audit 4.12 Run @ Rate 4.13 Corrective Actions 4.14 Phase 4 Gate Review & Sign Off
Phase 5.0 Feedback, Assessment and Corrective Actions 5.1 Handover of Project Responsibility to Production
Phase 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4
5.2 Management Review and Phase 5 Sign-Off 5.3 Launch Support (CIP) 5.4 Phase 5 Gate Review & Sign Off Overall Project Phases Review & Sign Off
C Completed O On Schedule Issued By: Issued Date: Issue No.: Page 1 of 10 Latest Date : 07/21/2011
Page 1 of 10
ormance
ment
xt APQP Date
tion Required
Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of 10
Neu:
Ort Risiko
Technologie x
Prozess x
Team Mitglieder
Firma / Ttigkeit
Required Date
Quantity
Special Characteristics
Comments
APQP Elements
G Y R
Projekt FlligkeitsDatum
erledigt Datum
Champion Name
Bemerkungen / Aktionsplan
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Required Form
63423512.xls.XLS
Neu:
Ort Risiko
Technologie x
Prozess x
Team Mitglieder
Firma / Ttigkeit
Required Date
Quantity
Special Characteristics
Comments
APQP Elements
G Y R
Projekt FlligkeitsDatum
erledigt Datum
Champion Name
Bemerkungen / Aktionsplan
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Required Form
63423512.xls.XLS
Neu:
Ort Risiko
Technologie x
Prozess x
Team Mitglieder
Firma / Ttigkeit
Required Date
Quantity
Special Characteristics
Comments
APQP Elements
G Y R
Projekt FlligkeitsDatum
erledigt Datum
Champion Name
Bemerkungen / Aktionsplan
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Ops Team
Required Form
63423512.xls.XLS
Phases
Department
Customer
Person
R
C I
Phase 1
Phase 2
R R R
Phase 3
R A
Phase 4
Robbie Howarth
APQP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM APQP Document Change List No: 1 Date Doc # Change Reason for Change
Title
Page #
63423512.xls.XLS
Meeting Log
Date of APQP Meetings Name of Participant Kick-off 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Optional Form
63423512.xls.XLS
Requirements
Comments/Actions Required
Task Status
Resp. Initials
Due Date
Is product adequately defined (application requirements, etc.) to enable feasibility evaluation? Can Engineering Performance Specifications can be met as written?
Can product can be manufactured to tolerances as specified on drawing and in accordance with the DBL and Lastenheft? Is there adequate capacity to produce product?
Product can be manufactured with Cpk's that meet minimum 1.33 requirements (1.67 on safety related items). Product can be manufactured with Cpk's that meet minimum 1.33 requirements (1.67 on safety related items). Where statistical process controls is(are) used on similar products, the processes are stable and in control. Where statistical process controls is(are) used on similar products, Cpk's are greater than 1.33 (1.67 on safety related items). Lessons learned from similar products have been reviewed by the team. How? When? The Suppliers APQP Team has reviewed and signed off the Feasiblity Commitment Checklist.
10
Conclusion Feasible Feasible Not Feasible FALSE Product can be produced as specified with no revisions FALSE Changes recommended or open issues need addressed (see attached) FALSE Design revision required to produce product with the specified requirements
Approval
Team Leader/Date:
Tooling Engineer/Date:
Industrial Engineer/Date:
Title:
Title:
Commercial Checklist
Plant Customer / Product
Date
Requirements
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
1 2
The Letter of Intent has been signed by NTG and the supplier.
Task Not Complete
All PPAP requirements are documented and understood to allow for Customer payment of tooling and/or equipment. Sufficient money is budgeted for the purchase of gages, or other required verification equipment (measurement systems & testing equipment). There are no additional costs required beyond the quotation that need to be discussed with the customer.
10
The latest Engineering change is to all agreed ESI (Early Supplier Involvement) specifications (I.e. test, material, datum schemes, tolerances, etc.) All changes to date have been agreed to by Schefenacker Engineering and Purchasing. The customers Supplier Quality Manual and its related expectations/measurements have been completely reviewed, understood and agreed to.
11
12
0% 100%
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
Dimensions or properties that affect fit, function and durability have been identified.
Task Not Complete
Key Quality Characteristics (KQC) and Key Process Characteristics (KPC) have been selected and documented. All known customer concerns have been identified to facilitate the selection of KQC's and KPC's. Sufficient control points and datum surfaces are identified to design functional gages.
Task Not Complete
Specified materials are compatible with the durability requirements in the identified environment.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Specified raw materials (example: steel) are commercially available in country of manufacture.
All pending Engineering changes that may postpone the start of tooling, fixturing, raw material purchases, etc have been accounted for and implemented into the timing with no detrimental timing changes.
Task Not Complete
19
The product test plan is complete and approved by SVS NPI team.
Task Not Complete
20
Please list the Key Quality Characterstics and methods to be used to monitor in this area
Tooling Checklist
Plant Customer / Product Date
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
The tool design has provided for volume fluctuations, where applicable.
Task Not Complete
Key quality characteristics and key process characteristics were considered in the design of the tooling.
The material specifications, including physical and chemical properties of the material to be processed in the tool, were considered in the design of the tooling.
10
11
A timeline with sufficient tooling detail has been submitted to the customer.
Task Not Complete
12
Tool Tracking Sheets have lists prepared identifying all new tooling.
Task Not Complete
13
The supplier and tooling contractor have a written acceptance criteria for new tooling.
Task Not Complete
14
Preliminary capability studies or a sample run-off will be conducted at the tooling manufacturer.
16
17
18
Parts submitted from tools to Painter and SVS for evaluation and buy-off (painted product). Tooling Preventive Maintenance established and approved by SVS and Painter (painted product).
19
Allowable limits for burrs, flash, and trimming are documented and understood.
Task Not Complete
21
22
Certified checking fixtures will be available at the tool source for part run-offs.
Task Not Complete
23
Parting lines and gate locations are documented and understood (molded parts).
0% 100%
Should we distinguish between our tools we give suppliers and tools they make? Or add statement for tools they make?
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
The process flow chart illustrates the production sequence, production methods and inspection stations including all incoming components.
The operation number on the flowchart will be carried over to the control plan and the Process FMEA. Provisions have been made to identify and inspect reworked products before being used. The rework and requalification loop is illustrated on the flowchart.
0% 100%
Requirements
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
1
2
If applicable, the DFMEA was used to help develop the PFMEA. The Process FMEA was prepared using the AIAG guidelines for severity, detection and occurence.
Task Not Complete
All the operations affecting fit, function, durability, governmental regulations, and safety have been identified.
Experience with similar parts and lessons learned were considered for the PFMEA.
Task Not Complete
Historical plant returns, campaign and warranty data were considered for the PFMEA.
Task Not Complete
Appropriate corrective actions have been planned or taken for high risk priority numbers.
Appropriate corrective actions have been planned or taken for high severity numbers.
Task Not Complete
Appropriate corrective actions have been planned or taken for high dectection numbers. Appropriate corrective actions have been planned or taken for high occurence numbers.
10
Risk priority numbers were revised when a corrective action was completed.
Task Not Complete
12
High severity numbers were revised when a design change was completed.
Task Not Complete
13
Causes have been described in terms of something that can be fixed or controlled.
Task Not Complete
14
Where detection is the major factor, provisions have been made to control the cause prior to the next operation.
0% 100%
PFMEA
Equipment Checklist
Plant Customer / Product Date
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
The new equipment was designed and will be built to corporate engineering standards, using standard components.
A timeline with sufficient equipment detail has been submitted to the customer.
Task Not Complete
10
A list has been prepared identifying all new equipment specific to the project.
Task Not Complete
11
The supplier and equipment contractor have a written acceptance criteria for new equipment. Certified checking fixtures will be available at the assembly equipment source for part run offs.
12
14
The feasibility and accuracy of new test equipment has been established.
Task Not Complete
15
A preventive maintenance plan has been started for equipment, including daily, weekly, monthly and annual inspections.
17
18
The setup instructions for new equipment are complete and understandable.
Task Not Complete
19
The process characteristics that affect key quality characteristics have been identified.
Task Not Complete
20
Capability or 100% mistake proofing of the key quality characteristics was used in determining acceptance criteria. The manufacturing equipment has sufficient capacity to handle forecasted production and service volumes. In-house testing & measurement capacity is sufficient to provide adequate support for PPAP and problem solving.
21
22
0% 100%
Gauge Plan
Gauge Checklist
Plant Customer / Product Date
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
The NTG Gauge Manual was used to develop specifications for the gage design. If not, list exceptions.
Key quality characteristics have been incorporated into the gauge design.
Task Not Complete
The Gage Plan has been completed and signed off by the SDE.
Task Not Complete
A timeline with sufficient gage detail has been submitted to the customer.
Task Not Complete
The gage (s) will be complete and certified in time for the first off-tool parts.
Task Not Complete
10
The gage (s) will be complete and certified in time for the assembly equipment buy-off.
Task Not Complete
11
A GR&R has been planned at the Gage builder using prototype or similar parts.
Task Not Complete
12
The type of gage certification required has been agreed upon with the SDE (3rd Party, gage supplier/part supplier, customer certification). The AIAG Measurement System Analysis GR&R method will be used to determine gage error.
13
15
Work instructions for gage use will be written and available for the Part PPAP review.
Task Not Complete
16
17
Grain / Paint / Chrome Standards are at location and verified to proper level (Color code and spray date).
All gages are correlated. The parts are able to be layed out with the fixture or correlation studies between the check gages and the CMM holding fixture will be completed and necessary corrections made.
0% 106%
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
All Significant Product Characteristics (SPC's) and Special Process Characteristics are included in the control plan. SC's are noted on the control plan with a Diamond <D>. All Critical Characteristics realated to safety, FDA regulations, are identified per GMP. Special Characteristics symbols used as requirments. Each line f the control plan has an asspciatied reation plan to aid in containment, process correction and process re-validation. Annual re-validation requirements have been agreed with are included on the control plan. Features that are mistake proofed are easily identified in control plan or the supplier has completed the Mistake Proofing Matrix. A sensor / fixture verification audit is performed on a regular basis to verify that all mistake proofing details are working properly.
All gauges and test equipment, as required by the control plan, are available.
Task Not Complete
A review of measurement methods between the supplier and customer has taken place to assure compatibility.
Control plan
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
All characteristics listed in the pre-launch control plan are being checked 100%.
The inspection methods for each characteristic are listed and approved by the SDE.
The format for reporting the measurement/inspection results for trial parts have been reviewed with and agreed to by the SDE. All known customer concerns have been identified to facilitate the selection of key quality characteristics and special process characteristics. All special characteristics (SC's) and special process characteristics are included in the prelaunch control plan. SC's are noted on the pre-launch control plan with a <D>. The pre-launch control plan addresses all incoming (material/components) through processing and assembly, including packaging and shipping.
Engineering performance testing requirements are identified on the pre-launch control plan.
All gauges and test equipment, as required by the pre-launch control plan, are available.
All Critical Characteristics realated to safety, FMVSS regulations, are identified per AIAG Special Characteristics sybols per end used requirments. Supporting documantation to safety items will be submitted per shipment.
0% 100%
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
The supplier has identified who will be the Quality Engineer with the customer.
Task Not Complete
The supplier has identified who will be the Quality Engineer with its suppliers
Task Not Complete
A Process/APQP Audit has been performed by Strata (Sections 1, 3, 4, 6 & 21). The manufacturing location has a quality certification. By Which Standard? Last certification date? Next Certification date? List the dates for Certification to EN AS 9100 & ISO 14001 in comments box (if applicable). Is there a First off/Last off (FO/LO) procedure to insure part quality shift to shift.
Task Not Complete Task Not Complete
Sufficient personnel are available to cover all layout & testing requirements.
Task Not Complete
Each operation is provided with machine or process instructions that are keyed to the process flow chart & control plan.
10
Visual aids (pictures or diagrams) are included in the Standard operator instructions. Operators and team leaders were involved in developing standard operator instructions.
11
13
14
15
There is a documented training program that lists who has been trained on particular job functions.
17
Training has been completed for statistical process control and statistical methods, such as capability studies, trend analysis & pareto charts. Training been completed for some type of disciplined problem solving (8-D, 7-step, etc..)
18
Training has been completed for other topics as identified. Please list.
Task Not Complete
20
There is a procedure to implement, maintain and establish reaction plans for abnormal production conditions, such as processes being outside of control chart limits (including molding perimeters).
22
Provisions have been made to place the latest drawings and specifications at a point of accessibility. Drawings, catia files and specifications are controlled so as to prevent access to obsolete or unreleased documentation.
23
25
Provisions have been made to place inspection gages at the monitored operation.
Task Not Complete
26
Provisions have been made to place gage instructions at the monitored operation.
Provisions have been made to place reference or limit samples at the monitored operation.
27
Provisions have been made to place inspection logs at the monitored operation.
Task Not Complete
29
Provisions have been made to certify and routinely calibrate gages and test equipment.
31
Layout, inspection equipment and the quality facilities are adequate to provide initial and ongoing layout of all details and components. There is a procedure for controlling incoming products that identifies characteristics to be inspected. There is a procedure for controlling incoming products that identifies frequency of inspection and sample sizes. There is a procedure for controlling incoming products that identifies disposition of nonconforming products. There is a procedure to identify, segregate and control nonconforming products to prevent shipment.
33
34
35
36
38
39
40
There is an appropriate Lot Traceability system from raw material to finished product.
42
First in/First out (FIFO) is practiced and insured during all phases of the material handling process (receiving through shipping).
Is there a First off/Last off (FO/LO) procedure to insure part quality shift to shift.
Task Not Complete
44
The Launch Containment Plan (I.e. GP12, etc) has been developed and submitted to the Schefenacker SDE for review. There is a plan to support Launch Containment Process activites (manpower, supplies & equipment). The criteria is developed and understood for exiting the Launch Containment Process.
45
46
0% 100%
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
The floor plan identifies all the required process and inspection points.
Task Not Complete
Areas for all materials, tools, and equipment at each operation are clearly marked.
Task Not Complete
Sufficient space has been allocated for all equipment including storage of dies, gages, dunnage, visual aids, ingredients, sub-assemblies and any sub components.
Process and inspection areas are of adequate size and easily accessed.
Task Not Complete
Non-conforming material areas are of adequate size, can be secured, and are clearly marked. Inspection points are logically located to prevent shipment of nonconforming products. Controls have been established to eliminate the potential for an operation, including outside processing, to contaminate or mix similar products.
10
12
The cell layout is complete and has been approved by a cross-functional team.
0% 100%
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
All sub-suppliers and contractors have been selected for material, components, tooling, gauges, and equipment. Material & Component sub-suppliers are on schedule with tooling & equipment to support the project timeline and milestones. Purchase orders have been issued for all material & components to support the start of production trials. Purchase orders to lower tier suppliers contain terms & conditions relating to quality standards for the sub-suppliers (Cpk, material certification, PPAP level/requirements, standards, PPM, etc.). Sub-suppliers have submitted current timelines to the suppliers purchasing and project management. Sub-suppliers have received forecast and ramp-up schedules to support all production trials, system fill, SOP and peak volume demands.. Production level Material has been defined and is it the same material that will be used from the start of the production trials. The engineering level of the material & components for the start of the production trials match the current released engineering level. All Material & Component PPAP's with the sub-suppliers are complete and have received full PPAP approval.
Resp. Initials
Due Date
All packaging (production) has been approved, staged and ready for launch
0% 100%
Requirements
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
The packaging is sufficient to prevent damage to all parts, particularly those parts with plating, painting, critical appearance criteria.
Alternate containers or packaging has been investigated in case of unforseen circumstances. The details of part transportation and delivery have been agreed to with the suppliers and customers
The supplier has made all the appropriate contacts to enable a smooth communication flow and conduct necessary business (engineering change control, inventory control, packaging & logistics, service & parts, purchasing, quality, engineering liaison, accou
Task Not Complete
The suppliers has received forecast and ramp-up schedules to support all production trials, system fill, SOP and peak volume demands..
0% 100%
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
Samples parts for the Production Validation (PV) have been secured and PV testing is proceeding to the agreed schedule. A preliminary Run@Rate has been performed and the production rate is acceptable to meet the launch curve at the necessary quality level. The tier 1 supplier has reviewed the production capacity at all lower tier suppliers. The production rates are sufficient to meet the launch curve at the necessary quality level.
Resp. Initials
Due Date
The Gage Plan has been completed and signed off by the SDE giving approval to use the gage in series production.
Inspections Methods are complete and to the latest engineering level for each shipping unit. Copies are included in the PPAP submission. The Launch Containment Plan has been agreed by Strata and has been implemented at the supplier. Pre-grain samples have been submitted to Strata. The supplier has received authorization to grain the tooling.
10
Process numbers match between Process Flow Diagram, Process FMEA, and Control Plan.
0% 100%
Requirements 1
Comments/Actions Required
Resp. Initials
Due Date
The PPAP sample parts have been produced to the latest engineering change level and have been shipped to the customer for PPAP approval with necessary data.
All material test results are complete, acceptable and referenced in the PPAP submission.
Task Not Complete
All components parts and materials have received full PPAP approval from suppliers. All supplier's PPAP's (tier 2) are referenced within the PPAP submission. A run @ rate has been performed and documented by the NTG SDE. The production rate is sufficient to sustain full series production at published volumes. The part is being produced at the current engineering release level with no open deviations.
The Process Flow, PFMEA and Control Plan have been updated to reflect the current manufacturing & quality processes.
The Production Validation (PV) Testing is complete and parts from the series tooling & processes meet all known Specifications (Drawing, OEM Specifications, SAE, ASTM, etc..). A summary of the PV test plan and report is included in the PPAP documentation The Launch Containment Plan has been effective in capturing all defective material at the supplier location. All PPAP documentation is complete (utilize AIAG guidelines) and the package has been reviewed internally prior to submission to the Customer.
"Part number" is NTG Part Number. "Engineering Drawing Change Level" and "Date" is NTG Drawing Level and Date. "Shown on Drawing" is NTG Drawing. "Weight (kg)" is to four (4) places expressed in kilograms. NTG Supplier Code is
11
All, if any, applicable NTG Change Control Notices (CCN's) included. If none insert sheet saying not applicable.
Task Not Complete
All, if any, applicable NTG Tool Life Deviations (TLD's) included. If none insert sheet saying not applicable.
Task Not Complete
A six (6) piece per cality (minimum) part layout is complete. The layout includes 100% of all dimensions (as default) or all of those dimensions agreed with the SDE. All print notes are referenced on layout.
Task Not Complete
Dimensional results of the part layout are documented in the format agreed with the SDE. Dimensional results are referenced by balloon number on ballooned print (included in PPAP submission).
Task Not Complete
If necessary, special layout set-ups for dimensions are reviewed and approved by customer before PPAP submission.
Task Not Complete
All significant and critical characteristics have initial process studies. Sample size is per AIAG Guidelines. If drawing does not contain critical dimension(s) then characterstic to measure shouwl be agreed upon with the Enginee All required capability studies have been performed and meet requirements of 1.67 Ppk/Cpk.
Task Not Complete
A GR&R is performed for every gage used on the control plan, process study.
Task Not Complete
Gage R&R's have been completed for all checking fixtures and test equipment, associated with the shipping unit, intended for production use. GR&R's are equal to or less than the target as per AIAG Guidelines.
Task Not Complete
All checking fixtures associated with the shipping unit are certified and certification is referenced in the PPAP submission. If none insert sheet saying not applicable.
Task Not Complete
A summary of the PV test plan and report is included in the PPAP documentation.
Restricted or reportable substances report - appropiate OEM form is included (CS9000, GM3059, WSS-M99P9999-A1 report).
Documentation is provided showing lab is approved to perform testing (ISO/TS 16949:2002, A2LA, ISO25, etc.).
Task Not Complete
Design FMEA is included in PPAP submission. If not design responsible, insert sheet saying not applicable. If Design FMEA is propietary, insert sheet saying propietary and only for review at supplier location.
Task Not Complete
Process FMEA is included in PPAP submission. If Process FMEA is propietary, insert sheet saying propietary and only for review at supplier location.
Task Not Complete
The Appearance Approval Report (AAR) has been completed for grain, gloss & color and accepted by SVS and OEM.
Master samples have been retained by the suppliers for use in making acceptance and boundary samples. Insert sheet in PPAP submission stating master samples retained at supplier.
Two (2) samples are included in PPAP submission. Samples are to be marked with program, part number, print revision level, and date of PSW (date supplier signed PSW).
For bulk material suppliers only. Insert sheet saying not applicable if do not need checksheet.
0%
Drawing Zone
Special [S.C]
PFMEA RPN
Functional
Impact of Failure
Prevention: Detection: Prevention: Detection: Prevention: Detection: Prevention: Detection: Prevention: Detection: Prevention: Detection: Prevention: Detection: Prevention: Detection: Prevention: Detection: Prevention: Detection:
Date
BW Supplier Dev. Representative
Sign
Supplier Representative:
63423512.xls.xls
Fit
racteristics Form
Cpk [C] or Error Proof [E]
Target Date
63423512.xls.xls
Status R/Y/G
DEFINITIONS
controlled document in accordance to FDA & National Regulations
Risk/Status Assessment Definition Target dates and/or deliverables are at risk. A recovery work plan is not available and/or implemented, or the work plan does not achieve program targets. Target dates and/or deliverables are at risk, but a resourced recovery work plan has been developed to achieve program targets, and has been approved by the appropriate Management Team Target dates and deliverables are on track and meeting objectives.
Form Required/Optiona R O O O O
63423512.xls.XLS
definitions 50/51
DEFINITIONS
Risk/Status Assessment Definition re at risk. A recovery work plan is not available and/or implemented, or the work plan does not
re at risk, but a resourced recovery work plan has been developed to achieve proved by the appropriate Management Team on track and meeting objectives.
63423512.xls.XLS
definitions 51/51