-- 2.

0

l
l

, , , , .
.

. .

. .

. ,
, .

l
l

, ,
.
.

.
(Legal Code) .
Disclaimer

AEO

A Study on the Implementation of Authorized Economic

Operator (AEO) Program

- Focused on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Incheon Area -

2011 2

()

AEO

A Study on the Implementation of Authorized Economic

Operator (AEO) Program

- Focused on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Incheon Area -

2011 2

2010
-

AEO

.
2011 2

- iii -

2 AEO

10

10

13

1.

13

2.

14

17

20

23

1.

23

2.

23

1
2

AEO

3.

AEO

4.
3

AEO

AEO

3.

25

4.

26

30

30

31

35

36

1.

36

2.

37

37

3. MOU

- i -

37

37

41

46

1.

46

2.

49

1. AEO

2. FTA

4 AEO

52

52

52

56

62

65

1.

65

66

67

68

69

71

74

AEO

1. AEO
2.

3.

2. AEO

(MRA)

77

77

79

81

Abstract

- ii -

84

<

>

>

<

1-1>

<

1-2>

<

2-1

<

2-2>

<

2-3>

<

2-4>

<

MOU

AEO

12

AEO

13

16

AEO

17

2-5>

AEO

18

<

2-6>

AEO

19

<

2-7>

20

<

2-8>

26

<

2-9>

28

<

3-1>

31

<

3-2>

36

<

3-3>

41

<

3-4>

42

<

3-5>

42

<

4-1>

53

<

4-2>

54

<

4-3>

55

<

4-4>

57

<

4-5>

58

<

4-6>

59

<

4-7>

59

<

4-8>

60

61

<

4-9>

3M

AEO

MRA

FTA

FTA

- iii -

<

4-10>

<

4-11>

<

4-12>

<

4-13> MRA

<

4-14> 6

<

4-15>

<

<

<

<

<

<

<

<

<

<

<

<

<

<

<

<

1-1>

2-1>

2-2>

2-3>

2-4>

3-1>

3-2>

3-3>

3-4>

3-5>

3-6>

3-7>

3-8>

3-9>

4-1>

4-2>

4-3>

WCO SAFE Framework

61

62

68

70

72

76

AEO

<
<

>

22

24

27

29

31

32

33

34

35

AEO

39

FTA

44

47

48

52

56

63

AEO

MRA

MRA

AEO

FTA

AEO

- iv -

<

<

<

<

<

<

4-4>

4-5>

4-6>

4-7>

4-8>

5-1>

64

65

66

67

74

79

AEO

AEO

<
<

FTA

<FTA

<

>

89

89

91

>

>

- v -

>


AEO
-

AEO

. FTA

AEO

),

MOU

),

"

"

AEO

AEO

AEO

(Customs

C-TPAT,

CSI,

24

Line)

Hour
.

C-TPAT

9.11

Rule,

100%

Rule

WCO

SAFE Framework

ISO(

ICAO

IMO(

ISPS Code

15

FTA

114

2009

- vi -

99.9%

FTA

14%,

27%

(73.8%)

(FTA)

. AEO
(2010

(0.9%)

42

12

AEO

(6

FTA

2010

FTA

-EU

FTA

FTA

AEO

FTA

AEO

, AEO

AEO
.

AEO

AEO

AEO

15

100

(MRA)

),

500

(4

AEO

AEO

AEO

(37%)

(28%)

- vii -

CEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

(MRA)

AEO

AEO

Corporate

(CSR

Social

Responsibility)

ASC(Authorized

Supply

[noblesse

Chain)

Model

AEO

AEO

oblige]

AEO

10

- viii -

1
1

2001

9.11

(Facilitation)

(Security)

9.11

FTA

45

15

FTA

2004

11

EFTA,

FTA

CSI,1)

C-TPAT2)

(WCO)3)

1)

(CSI : Container Security Initiative)

2002

(CBP : Bureau of Customs and Border Protection,

.)

. CBP

"extend

[the]

zone

line of defense, not the first.(

)"

of

security

outward

so

that

American

borders

are

the

last

. CSI

2)

(C-TPAT : Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism)

C-TPAT

- 1 -


<

1-1>

SAFE

Framework

(WCO SAFE Framework of Standards to secure and facilitate global trade)

2005

27

< 1-1> WCO SAFE Framework

Authorized Economic Operator is a party involved in the
international movement of goods in whatever function that has been
approved by or on behalf of a national Customs administration as
complying with WCO or equivalent supply chain security standards.
Authorized Economic Operators include inter alia manufacturers,
importers, exporters, brokers, carriers, consolidators, intermediaries,
ports, airports, terminal operators, integrated operators, warehouses,
distributors
AEO4)(Authorized Economic Operator)
WCO
. AEO , , ,
, , , , , ,
, .

(2009),

, AEO, 6

5)

WCO

WCO

3)

(WCO : World Customs Organization)

,

1953

. 94

10

(CCC)

4) 2005

WCO

(WCO)

(SAFE Framework)

(EU)

AEO

5)

WCO

CCC

'

'

',

.(

'

Content/content.html)

- 2 -

',

'

http://www.wcoomd.org/Kyoto_New/

2006

Framework
AEO
EU

SAFE

Framework

AEO

WCO

<

1-1>

SAFE

. WCO

EU

WCO

2008

AEO

(AEO)

< 1-1>

(2009), AEO

, 1

2008

),

2009

255

259

2010

12

2007

110

AEO

100%

2007

),

67

6)

2(

2009

2(

'

911

9/11

- 3 -

(Implementing

6)

the

9/11

Commission

2012

2011

100%

AEO

AEO

15

7)

114

99.9%

FTA

2009

14%,

FTA

.8)

27%

9)

2009

(73.8%)

(FTA)

(0.9%)

42

(6

AEO

, AEO

(10.12.8

FTA

AEO
,

),

<

1-2>

),

MOU

"

"

Recommendations Act of 2007)

7) 2008

8)
4

299,

(2010),

128

300

FTA

28

9)

(CDW : Customs Data Warehouse)

(DB)

- 4 -

(http://www.etnews.co.kr),

FTA

AEO

10)

AEO

AEO

< 1-2> MOU

11)

20

10)

11

(forwarder),

"

11)

(2010),

(http://www.newsis.com)

, 4

20

- 5 -

"

MOU

AEO

12)

AEO

13),

FTA

FTA

AEO

2003

FTA

14)

(FTA)

AEO

AEO

AEO

(2010)

ASC15)

.16)

(2008)

12)

11

(forwarder),
"

13)
14)

(2004,

(2010,

15)

(ASC

Authorized

Supply

Chain) :

16)

(2010,

- 6 -

"

.17)

(2008)

.18)

R&D

(2007)

.19)

(2008)

AEO

.20)

(2009)

Framework

GPS

WCO

.21)

(2008)

AEO

AEO

.22)

(2010)

e-freight,

RFID,

DM/UCR23)
,

AEO

17)

(2008,

18)

19)

(2006,

20)

(2008,

21)

(2009,

22)

(2008,

23) e-freight :

FTA

(2008,

, RFID(Radio-Frequency IDentification) :

, DM(Data Model)/UCR(Unique Consignment Reference Number) :

- 7 -

.24)

(2009)

.25)

(2006)

WCO

Framework

.26)

(2009)

AHP27)

.28)

(2008)

CSI

.29)

AEO

AEO

24)

(2010,

25)

(2009,

26)

(2006,

27)

(AHP

Analytical

Hierarchy

29)

(2008,

(2009,

'

(Pairwise

'

28)

Process)

(Hierarchy)

- 8 -

Comparison)

AEO

WCO

SAFE

Framework,

AEO

AEO

MRA30)

AEO

AEO

30)

(MRA

AEO

Mutual

Recognition
AEO

- 9 -

Arrangement)

2 AEO
1

(Supply

Chain

Security)

911

2001

(Facilitation)

(Security)

2003

(Department

2002

of

Homeland

CSI

18

Security)

C-TPAT,

24 Hour Rule

24

(Customs-Trade

Partnership

Against

Terrorism)

,
,

C-TPAT

NVOCC31)

WCO

C-TPAT

SAFE

WCO

Framework(

Framework

AEO

WCO

32)

AEO

31)

(NVOCC

Carrier)

- 10 -

Non-Vessel

Operating

Common

(IMO)33)

ISPS

04

Code34)

ISPS Code

(ICAO)36)

(1963

(1988

2007

.35)

),

(1970

),

),

(1991

(international

convention)

2002

37)

38)

.39)

32)

33)

(IMO

International

Maritime

Organization)

1958

.,

(http://100.naver.com)
34)

(ISPS

International

Facilities,
35)

Code

for

the

Security

of

Ships

and

of

Port

(2010),

AEO

, 62

36)

(ICAO

: International

Civil

Aviation

Organization)

UN

(http://100.naver.com)
37)

1974

2002

.,

38)

(http://100.naver.com)

- 11 -

X-ray














(ISO)40)

ISO

28001(

WCO

Framework

.41)

AEO

<

2-1>

< 2-1> AEO

: AEO

(2010

39)

(2009),

40)

(ISO

International

.,

41)

(2010),

Organization

for

Standardization)

1947

1946

(http://100.naver.com)

AEO

17

, 64

- 12 -

2 AEO

1.

AEO

2005

WCO

(SAFE

9.11

C-TPAT

Framework)

WCO

<

2-2>

(Security)

(Facilitation)

(EU)

AEO

2009

< 2-2> AEO

(2008), AEO

- 13 -

2.

AEO

AEO

(Non

Pass)

stop

Free

,AEO

(Enforced

Compliance)

(Informed Compliance)
.

,AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

1)

WCO

2005

Framework
.

of

Standards

to

169

Secure

and

Facilitate

157

Global
42)

36

(Letter

Trade

of

Intent)

2007.12.30

15

2009-11

42)

2009

60

84

- 14 -

2)

.43)

RFID

3)

(Non

Tariff

Barrier)

G20

C-TPAT

<

2-3>

AEO

AEO

2010

Nokia

AEO

Nokia

Nokia

AEO

Supplier

.44)

AEO

43)
44)

AEO

MRA

(2008),

, 361~362

.,

- 15 -

, 09

23

< 2-3> 3M

9.11

100

20

AEO

.45)

- 16 -

3.

AEO

1)

(ASC)

<

AEO

2-4>

AEO

< 2-4> AEO

45)

(2009),

, AEO

- 17 -

AEO

2)

AEO < 2-5>

AEO
. 3
.

< 2-5> AEO

AEO

<

2-6>

80

13

AEO

- 18 -

200%

< 2-6> AEO

3)

(2009),

, AEO, 35

80

AAA

, 90

80

AA

AA

95

- 19 -

4.

AEO

1)

2010
,

EU(27

AEO

<

2-7>

47

WCO SAFE Framework

<

2010

159

10

2-7> AEO

2)

C-TPAT

2002

2006

10

SAFE

PORT

C-TPAT

ACT

10

. 2010

T1,

T2,

T3

9,858

- 20 -

3)

SES

2007

2004

AEO

SES(Secure

Exports

MRA(

Scheme,

AEO

Green Lane

. 2010

4) EU

48

122

AEO

WCO

SAFE

Framework

EU

AEO(Authorized

Operator)

EU

2008

Economic

EU

AEO

2009

.
,

. 2010

17%,

5)

3%,

2,430

80%

07

AEO

EU

AEO

- 21 -

406

2010

55%

6)

CACC

Classified

2008

(CACC

Companies)
A,

B,

C,

1,217

AEO

<

< 2-1>

AEO

(AA

Administration

WCO

),

AEO

Customs

AA

2010

2-1>

AEO

C-TPAT

(Customs-Trade Partnership Against

Terrorism)

PIP

STP-Plus

SES

AEO
&
&
E U
AEO

CACC

&

AEO
&

(Partnership In Protection)

(Secure Trade Partnership)

(Secure Exports Scheme)

(Customs Administration Classified

Companies)

- 22 -

('10.5

9,858

1,283

24

122

406

2,430

'02

'08

'08

'04

'07

'08

1,217

'08

57

09

3 AEO
1.

9.11

C-TPAT

EU,

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

(MRA

Arrangement)

Mutual

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

2.

Recognition

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

2008

12

63%

AEO

- 23 -

67%

AEO

EU,

2010

GDP

46)

85%

AEO

AEO

AEO

<

2-2>

(CBP)

2008

$300~$500

AEO

9%

10

< 2-2>

C-TPAT

91%

$10,000)

20

$300$500

20

$3,000

, MIT

$5,000(2

, 2006

AEO

AEO

AEO

46)

(2010),

AEO

(http://news.donga.com), 12

21

- 24 -

85%

80%

(CBP)

C-TPAT

2009

(CBP)

86

2003

3.

MRA

AEO

(Action)

AEO

<

WCO

(phased

approach)

2-8>

AEO

MRA

MRA

AEO

- 25 -

<

4.

2-8>

(2009),

, AEO, 32

1)

AEO

13

2-4>

<

-EU,

2010

EU-

EU-

-EU,

EU-

- 26 -

EU,

< 2-3>

MRA

'07

'08

(13

'09

EU

'10

EU,

EU

EU,

EU

2)

MRA

EU,

AEO

AEO

MRA

AEO

AEO

FTA

MRA

MRA
.

MRA

MRA

<

2010

2-9>

AEO

AEO

AEO

- 27 -

< 2-9>

MRA

: US CBP, 1st National Conference on SAFE Trade and AEO, May 13, 2008

2010

11

<

WCO

(CCF

Customs

Cooperation

AEO

Fund)

AEO

.47)

AEO

47)

MRA

MRA

2-4>

(2010), 2011

- 28 -

< 2-4>

MRA

(4 )
()
(4 )
()
(4 )
()
MRA

MRA

MRA

AEO Working Group 1

MRA

(1 )

(2 )
(1 )

(2 )

EU
(1 )

AEO Working Group 2

'09.2
'10.6

'09.5
'10.6

'09.5
'10.6

'09.8
'09.9.28
'10.8
'10.9
'10.11

'10.8

AEO Working Group 2

'10.8

MRA
MRA

MRA

MRA

'11.
'09.9
'09.12.10

'10.11
'09.9.17

MRA

'10.3

MRA

'10.4

'10.7

(1 )
(2 )
( )

( )

( )

( )

10.5
'10.11
'11.

AEO

'10.10

AEO

'10.10

AEO

'10.10

AEO

'10.10

- 29 -

3
1

DDA48)

(FTA)

9.11

WCO

AEO

2008

<3-1>

AEO

FTA

),

48)

2001

11

- 30 -

(WTO)

< 3-1>

<

AEO

3-1>

99.9%

< 3-1>

AEO

AEO

AEO

157,866(99.9%)

114(0.1%)

157,980(100%)

2(20%)

8(80%)

10(100%)

(08

), AEO

(2010

12

21

2






<

2009

52,831

08

3-2>
,

22.2%(15,083

- 31 -

< 3-2>

2008

2009

12,206,297

18.0

8,858,835

16.8

11,227,774

16.5

8,341,143

15.8

7,577,744

11.2

4,967,929

9.4

3,019,703

4.4

3,654,749

6.9

2,539,905

3.7

2,220,997

4.2

2,071,576

3.0

1,978,024

3.7

2,468,644

3.6

1,985,498

3.7

3,618,574

5.3

1,881,131

3.6

2,489,980

3.7

1,833,355

3.5

10

1,965,841

2.9

1,412,790

2.7

11

1,305,910

1.9

1,229,348

2.3

12

1,216,883

1.8

1,234,317

2.3

13

1,621,086

2.4

1,087,745

2.0

14

1,202,546

1.8

789,004

1.5

15

13,381,699

19.8

11,356,386

21.6

67,914,162

100

52,831,251

100

, %)

CDW

2009

- 32 -

FTA

14%,

27%

<

3-3>

111,603

(74%)

82,370

FTA

978

FTA

622

54

(5.5%),

26

(2.7%)

(0.9%)

(63.6%),
07

FTA

276

(28.2%),

< 3-3>

FTA
FTA
EFTA - FTA
FTA

WTO

(
(

EFTA

CDW

- 33 -

82,370

73.8

22,624

20.3

667

0.6

146

0.1

622
54
276
26

0.6
0.2
-

121

0.1

238

0.2

114

0.1

178

0.2

16

93

91

2,035

1.8

1,924

1.7

111,603

100

(%)

<

15,369

08

3-4>

20,513

2009

25%

16%49)

< 3-4>

10

11

12

2009

, %)

3,254,271

15.86

2,893,526

18.83

2,336,298

11.39

1,402,128

9.12

978,078

4.77

1,068,393

6.95

718,988

3.51

860,345

5.60

668,830

3.26

687,169

4.47

510,405

2.49

591,642

3.85

416,992

2.03

581,461

3.78

434,724

2.12

477,570

3.11

806,477

3.93

407,003

2.65

422,393

2.06

404,258

2.63

396,552

1.93

279,329

1.82

9,568,936

46.65

5,716,529

37.2

20,512,944

100

15,369,353

100

: KITA.net

49)

2008

2008

>

>

422,007
>

- 34 -

09

363,534

FTA

05~07

15,369

6,840

<

2008~2009
(2009

44.5%

ASEAN,

3-5>

EFTA

FTA

FTA

EU

2009

ASEAN

CEPA

(10.1.1),

11

< 3-5>

FTA
FTA

2005

46,993

2006

, %)

EFTA

ASEAN

567,792

24,485

1,423,212

216,257

2,263,530

1,697,138

56,209

743,613

56,485

1,837,421

361,862

2,365,186

2,814,462

2007

86,248

731,828

76,018

2,389,895

420,160

2,314,040

4,629,074

2008

132,514

718,988

85,417

2,035,617

396,552

2,336,298

3,705,524

102,041

860,345

40,865

2,439,264

279,329

1,402,128

1,715,587

(0.66%)

(5.60%)

(0.27%)

(15.87%)

(1.82%)

(9.12%)

(11.16%)

2009

CDW

EU

TWO-TRACK

AEO

<

3-2>

FTA

- 35 -

< 3-2>

AEO

FTA

(5~10)

MOU

()

4
1.

FTA

FTA

CEO

AEO

- 36 -

2.

2010

27

17

>

FTA

AEO

CEO

MOU

3. MOU

FTA

.50)

MOU

FTA

FTA

FTA

5
1. AEO

1)

(AEO

Authorized

Economic

Operator)

9.11

WCO

50)

- 37 -

Trade

Supply

Chain)

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

2008

. AEO

CEO

2)

<

3-6>

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

),

AEO

- 38 -

AEO

< 3-6> AEO

-AEO

AEO

MOU

AEO

AEO

-AEO

AEO

-AEO

, AEO

-AEO

AEO

- AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

(seminar)

AEO

AEO

, AEO

AEO

AEO

CKM

AEO

Up-Grade

AEO

AEO

- AEO
-

- AEO

85

85

AEO

AEO

(SPEC)

(SPEC)51)

AEO

AEO

- 39 -

AEO

AEO

AEO

60%

350

AEO

*(

AEO

AEO

* 10

3,500

(1

- AEO

AEO

- 1, 2

AEO

AEO

12

- AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

51)

SPEC

specification

- 40 -

2. FTA

1)

FTA

<

3-3>

FTA

FTA

< 3-3> FTA

FTA

FTA

FTA

1. FTA

2. FTA

3.

4.

2) FTA

FTA

FTA

<

3-4>

<

3-5>

- 41 -

< 3-4>

FTA

< 3-5>

: FTA
: FTA
: FTA

: FTA
: FTA
: FTA

: FTA
: FTA
: C/O

: FTA
: FTA
: FTA REVIEW & RETOUCH

: FTA
: FTA FTA
: FTA
- 42 -









3)

FTA

FTA

CEO(

(FTA

FTA

FTA

FTA

4)

<

3-7>

FTA

HS

),

),

),

FTA

FTA

52)

52)

-EU

FTA

FTA

6,000

FTA

FTA

- 43 -

-EU

< 3-7> FTA

FTA

FTA

- FTA

FTA

=>

-
-

=>

BOM

FTA

=>

- HS
-

=>

FTA
-

FTA

FTA

FTA

HS

- FTA

HS

- 44 -

FTA

FTA

- FTA
-

FTA

=>

FTA

FTA

5)

FTA

6)

FTA

FTA

FTA

FTA

FTA

FTA

- 45 -

AEO

6
1.

1)

2010

MOU

FTA

CEO

AEO

AEO

12

53)

53)

10

- 46 -

200

192

< 3-8>

3.19

4.20

4.275.17

6.18
*

6.23

7.1

7.5~8.6

7.23

8.18

9.2

9.28

9.29

9.30

10.8

12.7

MOU

MOU

12

), (

, (

, (

(MOU

, 5

FTA

(9

CEO

(2

FTAAEO

FTA

(2

(1

FTA

(3

(AEO

(3

MOU

FTA
12.14

FTA

(4

), FTA

- 47 -

(1

), AEO

(1

2)

<

3-9>

FTA

< 3-9>

FTA (8.27)



FTA

FTA

(12

(9.2)

(8.24)

FTA (10.28)

FTA (12.14)
FTA (11.18)



FTA (11.18)
FTA (12..9)






FTA

FTA

(12

FTA

( )

FTA

(12

(9.1)

(7.1)

FTA

FTA

AEO

FTA

12

(9.30)

- 48 -

(11.30)

2.

1)

AEO

EU

-EU

(EU)

(FTA)

2010

11

FTA

2010

25

AEO

(MRA)

40

AEO

200

(85

80

50

3000

(12.21

1000

25

2010

42

AEO

67

200

54)

AEO

AEO

20

60%

AEO

(042-481-4493)

54)

800

AEO

1,300

120

100

- 49 -

AEO

11

AEO

2)

FTA

AEO

FTA

FTA

FTA

AEO

FTA

FTA

FTA

55)

FTA

56)

55)

FTA

2010

FTA
56)

, EU

FTA

FTA

15

FTA

- 50 -

- 51 -

4 AEO
1 AEO

1. AEO

1)

2009.6.30

AEO

,57)

,58)

2007

2008

59)

2010

AEO

AA

AEO

< 4-1> AEO

: 2010

11

~ 3

AEO

, AEO

16

38

AEO

57)

2004

2009

58)

2004

59)

2007

2009

1,000

, 2008

- 52 -




AEO

<

4-1>

.60)

2)

38

(100%)

(32%),

<

2010

12

2011

(5%)

4-1>

24

(63%),

FTA

18

AEO

< 4-1>

2010

5%

32%

2011

63%

<

4-2>

60)

- 53 -









38

(100%)

11

11

(24%),

(29%),

(29%),

(5%),

(5%),

(10%)

< 4-2>

10%

3%

.
24%

29%

5%

29%

38

<

61)

(100%)

(0%),

(0%),

10

(26%),

4-3>

(13%),

20

(8%),

(53%)

29

(56%)

61)

AEO

- 54 -




(8%)

AEO

< 4-3>

0%

0%

26%

53%

8%

13%

- 55 -

2.
1)

(, )

AEO

MOU

<

< 4-2>

: 2010

4-2>

(, )

11

10

~ 16

62)

CRM

549

56

10.2%)

: 12

: 38

: 6

: AEO

FAX

62)

(CRM

Customer

relationship

management)

- 56 -

2)

56

<

4-4>

(100%)

23

(9%),

22

(41%),

(39%),

(80%)

(2%)

(9%)

45

24%

9%

< 4-4>

(, )

0%

.
9%

.
2%

.
9%

.
41%

39%

<

4-5>

(100%)

17

19

(34%),

56

(30%),
16

(7%)

70%

30%

- 57 -

(29%),

< 4-5> (, )

7%

29%

0%

.
30%

34%

AEO

<

4-6>

56

(100%)

(5%),

34

(61%),

(4%),

13

(5%),

(2%)

(23%),

. 61%

<

AEO

4-7>

56

(100%)

(4%),

27

49%

(14%),

11

(4%),

(9%)

AEO

(49%),

(20%),
.

- 58 -

< 4-6> (, )

5%

23%

.
5%

2%

61%

4%

< 4-7> (, )

20%

4%

9%

.
4%

14%

49%

56

32

(100%)

(57%),

<

(9%),

(14%),

(4%)

- 59 -

4-8>

66%

(14%),

< 4-8> (, )

0%

.
6%

14%

.
9%

.
14%
.
57%

<

18

(4%)

4-9>

56

(0%),

(100%)

(32%),

19

(14%),

(2%),

34%

AEO

56

(100%)

(45%),

(25%),

70%

AEO

(11%),

14

(3%)

4-10>
9

(16%),

25

<

AEO

AEO

AEO

- 60 -

< 4-9> (, )

.
2%

4%
.
0%

.
14%

.
32%

.
48%

< 4-10> (, )

25%

0% 3%

16%

11%

45%

AEO

16

(7%),

<

4-11>

(0%),

(29%),

33

56

(3%)

- 61 -

(59%),
.

(100%)

(3%),




66%

< 4-11> (, )
.
7%

2%

.
0%

.
3%

29%

..
59%

3.
1)

(, , )

AEO

(2

),

AEO

(2

(2

(4

<

4-3>
,

AEO

- 62 -

),

AEO

< 4-3>

(, , )

: 2010

10

28

~ 11

30

: 2

: 2

: 4

- AEO

: 2

2)

: AEO

ASC

<

4-4>

80

=>

70

OFF

ON

AEO

LINE

LINE(

- 63 -

AEO

< 4-4>

(, )
-

AEO

AEO

AEO

- AEO

- 64 -

2
1.

AEO

, 2009

12

(CBP)

. 3M

AEO
.

AEO

<

4-5>

< 4-5>

255

2(

>

<

255

2(

2


1


.

- 65 -

2. AEO

63)

)64)

AEO(AM

11

T/F 15
.

2010

26

Matrix

242

11

2010

<

4-6>

79

< 4-6> AEO

LS

CJ

23

26

79
(17)

22

17

70%

500

100

65)

<

4-7>
.

(MRA)

),

(3

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

EU,

MRA

AEO

63)

64)

AM(Account

Manager)

65) 12
(

100

70%

- 66 -

< 4-7>

196

500

- C-TPAT Director

100

(50

400

100

AEO

AEO

08

11

09

08

10

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

<

4-12>

104

(100%)

AEO

AEO

22

AEO

44

41

AEO

33

AEO

2009

AEO

10

UNI-PASS

- 67 -

(AEO

2009

AEO

(28%)

AEO

(37%)

(33%)

2010

(28%)

AEO

< 4-12> AEO

AEO

, 2009

AEO

FTA

(TB)

AEO

(NTB)

AEO

EU

- 68 -

15

AEO(Authorized

Economic

Operator)

50%,

8.8

"

AEO

."

66)

"

"

11

2010

1997

2010

46

5,560
.

5 (MRA)

(MRA

Mutual Recognition Arrangement)

AEO

AEO

AEO

MRA

AEO

15

AEO

66)

AEO

2009

2010

MRA

(2010),

- 69 -

, 6

16

16

, EU

2010

29

12

FTA

45

, FTA

~1

MRA

(1

MRA

AEO

EU

T3

< 4-13> MRA

1 : X
2

MRA

:
:

, AEO

, 2008

- 70 -

11










<

4-13>

EU,

67)

AEO

AEO

68)

C-TPAT

. 6

(COPQ : Cost of Poor

Quality,
<

4-14>

AEO

(Visual : AEO

(Hidden :

AEO

KOICA
.
67)

2011

),

68)

2010

Training

),

),

MRA

WCO

Center)

- 71 -

(RTC:

Regional

< 4-14> 6

ASC(Authorized

AEO

69)

Role Model

,70)

10

Supply

Chain)

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

ASC

AEO

MOU

-AEO

(10.3)

-AEO

69)

AEO

70)

, (

- 72 -

AEO

AEO

AEO

. 3

-AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO
,

AEO

AEO

71)

(10.3)

72)

Self-Check
.

11

73)

, 2008

C-TPAT

2008

9.11

22.4%)

2.6

12

(2002

8.7%

, C-TPAT

10

AEO

2010

Nokia

AEO

Nokia

Nokia

AEO

Supplier

Self-Check

71)

(Core Values

Award)

2006

10-0946650

72)

(10.3.3)

73)

Bowing(

(2009),

), Bayer(

), Macy's(

.],

(http://www.klnews.co.kr), 4

- 73 -

3M(

AEO

17

),

7










99%

AEO

<

(24,911

(2,031

, 6%),

4-8>

2009

77%)

(1,738

< 4-8>

, 5%),

(1,450

, 4%)

, %)

29,570

24,911

84

77

1,021

1,021

100

2,031

1,981

98

1,773

1,738

98

1,500

1,450

97

820

805

98

525

514

98

37,240

32,465

87

100

(147,850

EU

20%

AEO

AEO

CEO

- 74 -

50%80%(

AEO

1,500

.74)

2~3

.75).

2009-341

<

4-15>

"

AEO

2010

74)
75)
76)

(6

20

.76)

2010

2011

2010

21

, 2010

106

(2010

) 2

- 75 -

AEO

10

< 4-15>

[ 3]
() ()

2005.

- 76 -

5
1

9.11

(Customs Line)
100%

CSI, 24 Hour Rule,

Rule

C-TPAT

9.11

WCO

2002

(Resolution

on

Security

International Trade Supply Chain)

Framework(Framework

Global Trade)

of

Standard

and

2005

Facilitation

the

to

Secure

and

Facilitate

AEO

AEO

2008

2009

AEO

of

AEO

AEO

AEO

2010

FTA

FTA

AEO

- 77 -

.77)

AEO
,

78)

ASC(Authorized

[noblesse

Supply Chain) Model

AEO

practice)

oblige]

AAA

(best

AEO

AEO

AEO

AEO

77)
78)

(2010),

(CSR
,

Corporate

Social

11

Responsibility)

- 78 -

2












,

AEO

AEO

AEO

2009

67

2010

12

17

<

5-1>

AEO

AEO

< 5-1

AEO >

: 10.12

41

17

9
22 22 9
3
3
0 6 2 0 67

13

13

: AEO

MRA

AEO
.

2011

FTA

2010

G20

- 79 -

EU

FTA,

IMF
















G20

.79)

FTA

AEO

WTO

AEO

AEO

AEO

.80)

AEO

79)
80)

(2010), FTA , 97
(2009), AEO!

- 80 -

, 2009

, 30


1.

1)

(2009),

, AEO

(2010),

40

(2008),

(2010), FTA

(2009),

AEO

(2006),

(2008), AEO

(2009), AEO

2)

(2008), AEO
(2009),

2009-11

(2010), 2011

(2010), AEO

(2008),

(2010),

(FTA)

(2006),

(2008),

AEO

31

- 81 -

(2008),

(2009),

Supply

Chain

(2008),

(2009), AEO!

(2010), AEO

, 2009

(2010),

(2009),

(2004), 2003

(AEO)

FTA

11

(2009),

(2009), AHP

(2008),

24

CSI

2008

2.

11

US CBP(2008), 1st National Conference on SAFE Trade and AEO,

WCO(2000), The International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonization
of Customs procedures(Revised)
WCO(2007), "SAFE Framework of standards"

3.

(2009),

(http://www.klnews.co.kr), 4

(2010),

85%

(http://news.donga.com), 12

(2010),

17
3

80%

21

- 82 -

(http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr), 6

(2010),

FTA

(http://www.etnews.co.kr), 4

(2010),

MOU

16

28

(http://www.newsis.com), 4

4.

(http://portal.customs.go.kr)
(http://www.mltm.go.kr)
(http://wcoomd.org)
(http://100.naver.com)

(http://www.klnews.co.kr)
(http://www.taxtimes.co.kr)
(http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr)
(http://www.joseilbo.com)
(http://www.mke.go.kr)

- 83 -

20

Abstract
A Study on the Implementation of Authorized
Economic Operator (AEO) Program

- Focused on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Incheon Area Kim, Jae-Hong

Major in International Trade
Graduate

School of

Business Administration
Inha

The

purpose

of

this

study

Authorized

Economic

Operator

enterprises

(hereinafter

referred

richest

base

policy
the

of

as

Incubating

of

analyze

Program

"SMEs")

sector

recommendations for more

results

to

(AEO)
to

manufacturing

is

in

Program

which

Industrial-Governmental-Educational

order

to

provide

(Jungseok
Main

Research

signed

Incubating
The

huge

FTA

Customs

which

Since

of

(Audit
an

support

Institute

of

Bureau),

MOU,

of

outbreak

border

this
of

the

for
for

AEO

management

Security'(integration

of

the

terror

agencies

Customs,

results

of

which

SMEs

in

the

to

by

means of

support

city

SMEs

Area.

through

Inha

In
the

University

Trade),

Commerce

the

propose

Incheon

and

Local

to

has

Incheon

(Secretariat),

Promising

SMEs

to as "incubator program").
can
the

named

Immigration,

- 84 -

in

Logistics

driving

attack,

the

of

medium-sized

tries

certification,

Chamber

been

study

program

companies

Incheon

and

9.11

The

and

area,

Partnership

International

have

study

Incheon

is

ProgramPlan (hereinafter referred

contents

the

opportunity
and

in

implementation

small

efficient support for

the

utilization

by

Korea.

under

an

the

University

be

summarized

United

States

'Department
Quarantine

as

follows.

launched

of

the

Homeland

Authority,

Coast

Guard

and

Border

Guard)

system

such

management
export

inspection

country
based

system

through
on

the

in

and

ect.

U.S.,

to

management

certification

Organization)

Maritime
the

The

area,

exports

by

amount

low.

SMEs

are
FTA)

Ship

at

of

114

all

of

Customs

Line.

In

the

on

the

plasticity

the
a

ICAO

to

WCO

prevent
'SAFE

adopt

the

time.

ISO

same

logistics

Safety

the

implementing

the

to

IMO

ISPS

and

exporting

security

(International

Aviation
and

Rule

standard

world
at

security

the

program

instituted

standard,

been

in

international
around

100%

particular,

partnership

implementing

large
FTA

is

14%

Thus,

current

few

the

entire

of

incubating

to

and

the
in

AEO

of

In

entire

case

the

and

Civil

security

(International

Code

Incheon,

In

tariffs,
terms

certified

of

the

FTA

System

for

is

companies

utilization,

27%

based

Korea-ASEAN
majority

and

of

158,000

of

imports

utilization

MFN

(0.9%).

nine

99.9%

companies.

companies

with

to

as

amounts

2009.

of

charged

Rule,

management

Standardization)

also

SMEs

in

case

Hour

chain

and Port Facility.

except

apply

risk

countries

been

has

24

supply

security and facilitation

Convention

exports
In

of

system

Korea-ASEAN

of

(73.8%)
(using

of the

proportion

Incheon

very

the

for

has

Organization)

safety

conduct

recommended

Organization

by

CSI,

established

(International

measures

implemented

C-TPAT,

system in order to pursue trade

Aviation

has

private-governmental

the

Framework,'

as

expansion

C-TPAT,

terrorism

and

the

AEO

of

the

FTA

is

companies

certification,
on

the

on

preferential

companies(based

in

tariffs

none

of

December

8, 2010).

As

results

designated

as

the

certified

designated

as

the

preferential

tariffs

successfully

evaluated

certified
under
in

the

program
exporter
exporter

promotion,
by

by

EU-Korea

respect

that

items

the

- 85 -

and

company

FTA.

Also,

utilization

five

for
the

companies

one

of

the

them

of

was

utilization

program

practice

were

this

has

of

been

program

at

2010

However,
FTA

as

FTA
the

Business

delay

well

as

of

the

difficult to utilize

Success

the

lack

implementation

of

FTAs. As

the

are

Therefore,

policy

certification
results,

numerous

for

listening

(export-import
with the

SMEs

to

on

and

is

companies,

the

audit team inside

of

training

the

lack

system

for

of

and

the

SMEs

interests
to

support

personnel

requirements

charge

AEO

of

Certification
staffs.

During

import
and
to

Audit

companies

occur

an

certification

smaller,

delay,

is

and

it

five

need

to

after

few
so

is

in

years,
be

is

been
our

exporting

plans

follows
from

and

trade

made

one

AEO

about

based

it

company

forwarders,

certification.

supporting

on

related

human

AEO

etc.)

and

AEO

driving

industry

In

of

to

Korea

to

about

500

sectors

interviews

about
mutual

companies

renewal

in

case
to

relatively

FTAs.

- 86 -

to

the

is

per

and

year),

to

AEO

(MRA)

goods

disadvantageous

15

scheduled

number

exporting

in

AEO

about

Due

agreement
that

(KCS)

export

companies
years)

AEO

future

named

including

audit.

Because

publicize

personnel

(four

recognition

benefits
is

100

period

the

contracted,

industries

additional

costs.

Service

tentatively

audit(about

validity

to

according

Customs

install

secure

and

required

addition,

the

country,

resources

desperately

certified

AEO

for

Korea-EU

companies in this study.

to

required

works

when
has

it

authorized

additional

countries

companies

planning

Divisionand

next

companies

the

foreign

the

SMEs,

and

Award.

legal basis which can support consulting

education.

system,

as

certified

vulnerable

by

diffusion

brokers,

First, it is important to make the

and

FTA

resources

utilization

surveys

AEO

Korea-U.S.

Excellent

support.

FTA

proposed

customs

got

it is so regretful that only

stable

feedback,

of

human

consulting

studies

implications
the

SMEs'

a result,

got AEO certification under the

There

Contest

Practice

of

with
AEO

become
with

the

Second,
and

according

education

equipment
many
now
AEO

and

(37%

In
it

and

other

the

Incheon

political

response

government,

Metropolitan

Chamber

of

Trade

of

City,

they

want

companies),
year.

have

sessions

Until

done,

encourage
on

and

now,

should

SMEs

AEO

publicity

supporting

even

it

the

system

and

although

be

to

operating

continued

participate

FTA

competitiveness

central

Main

Incheon

Association

government

Customs

Free

as

well

Economic

Business
and

in

utilization

as

in
well

the
as

local

that

changed. When AEO certification cooperate

Incheon

the

be held.

the

Incheon

Commerce,

International

to

the

policy

that

this

education

executives should

regarding

central

(28%)

that

local governments should be

the

shows

answering

words,

needs

targeting CEOs and

it

of

costs

publicity

application,

community,

survey,

consultant

forever.

Third,

institutions

institutions
and

to

Agency,

such

as

Zone

local

cooperation

is

with

government,

Authority,

Incheon

of

Branch
based,

Incheon
of

Korea

think

it

brings better effect.

Fourth,
which
only
the

the

cannot

limited
reason

MRA

is

signed
to

the

we

to

be

MRA

domestic,

are

carried
on
so

pursuing

forward

AEO
there
the

simultaneously.

certification
is

half

MRA

of

with

the

and

other

effect.

the

AEO

program,

countries,

These

expansion

facts
of

is
are

AEO

certifications simultaneously.

Fifth,
large

recently

companies

According
forward
Noblesse

to

as

and

this

'project
Oblige

companies
such

modern

sharing

the

social

spirit.
the

AEO

SMEs,

emphasize
and

environment,

creating

support

society

ASC

In

SMEs

words,

and

social

AEO-certified

supplying

experiences

mutual

corporate

(Authorized

other

on

it

Supply
is

large

companies

Chain)

project

between

responsibility

Model''

that

AEO

to

AEO

certified

transmitting

AEO

techniques.

- 87 -

goods

cooperation

(CSR).
carried

with

the

certified

companies
Incheon

Main
of

the

Customs

already

related

certification
supporting

10

received

companies,

examination
certification

available

when

it

uses

practices

which

are

and

and

costs,
its

certification
the

remaining

preparation

there

own

actually

examination

are

the

customs

helpful

in

five

for

for

application.

broker
of

and

companies

companies

requirements

case

five

In

that

we

are

the

terms

of

support

is

provide

preparing

under

the

themselves

best

to

be

certified, so political recommendations is suggested.

Sixth,
to
be

get

according

direct

provided

broker

or

support

it

is

forwarders

teamunder
of

foreign

survey,

for

according

International
think

to

human
to

in

good
the

way

SMEs

similar

way

Certification
to

make

up

Private-Governmental

customs

authorities

companies regarding

the

is

resources

characteristics

Standards

the

and

the

desperately

and
by

such

the
as

Support
and

funding.

the

verification

most

SMEs

support

request

In

the
by

should

customs

Administration's
addition,

emergency
against

important

including

Program.

Partnership

- 88 -

The

fields,

operate

rules of origin and the

the

supporting

visiting

foreign

implementation of

audit

trading

AEO.


<FTA >

: , FTA , ()
- 89 -

<FTA >

- 90 -

< >

- 91 -