You are on page 1of 17

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Scoping Report Plant Robert W. Scherer (Plant Scherer) Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Prepared by Georgia Department of Public Health June 2012


For more information, please contact: Franklin Sanchez, Health Assessor Chemical Hazards Program 2 Peachtree Street, 13th Floor Atlanta, Georgia 30303 (404) 657-6534 www.health.state.ga.us/programs/hazards

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Statement of Issues
In March and April 2012, the Georgia Department of Public Health (GDPH) received reports of health concerns by several residents regarding Plant Scherer, a coal-fired power plant operated and maintained by Georgia Power Company (Georgia Power) in Juliette, Georgia. Because Plant Scherer has an unlined coal-ash disposal pond, residents have expressed concerns about uranium contamination found in groundwater and whether other chemicals and health issues may be related to facility operations. GDPH staff documented reports from residents with concerns about potential groundwater contamination, and media coverage provided additional facility information and environmental and health concerns. In April 2012, CNN reported that a number of residents living near the plant had numerous health problems, including nose bleeds, asthma, muscle twitches, dementia, and cancer [1-4] The purpose of this Scoping Report is to address residents health concerns. Under a cooperative agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), the GDPH conducted this initial investigation to provide information about public health issues related to exposure to chemicals in the environment, and to identify populations for which further health-related actions may be needed. It is not intended to address liability or other non-health issues. GDPH works with local, state, and federal government agencies, elected officials, the business community, residents, and others to address environmental and public health issues. A Scoping Report is the first step in reporting whether regulated chemicals may pose a risk to public health. All applicable and valid environmental data are evaluated to determine what actions are needed to protect public health and/or inform communities. The results of the scoping investigation may result in no additional public health actions, or a public health assessment, health consultation, health advisory, exposure investigation, or a health study.

For Plant Scherer, the GDPH concludes that additional groundwater data evaluation is needed to determine: 1) if contaminants are present in off-site groundwater, and 2) the nature and extent of those contaminants. The limited data available do not indicate that humans are being or have been exposed to levels of contamination that would be expected to cause adverse health effects; however, GDPH will conduct a health consultation for groundwater. More information about the health consultations can be found in Appendix A.

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Facility Description and Background


Plant Robert W. Scherer (Plant Scherer) is one of the largest coal-fired power plants in the United States The plant is located on Highway 87 in Juliette, Georgia approximately three miles south of Juliettes town center. Juliette is a rural community in central Georgia located in eastern-central Monroe County approximately 12 miles northeast of Forsyth; the nearest city. Plant Scherer encompasses 12,000 acres (approximately 19 square miles) of land that includes almost half of Lake Juliette in Monroe County. Plant Scherer began operating in March 1982 after the completion of its first 880-megawatt unit (Unit One). Units Two, Three and Four followed in February 1984, January 1987 and March 1989, respectively. Georgia Power operates the entire facility under contract with the joint owners: Oglethorpe Power Company, Florida Power and Light Company, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, Gulf Power Company, Jacksonville Electric Authority, and the City of Dalton, Georgia [5]. The main operating area of the plant site covers about 3,500 acres. It includes the powerhouse and the turbine area for all four units; a 750-acre ash disposal pond; a 300-acre ash settling pond; a 40-acre retention pond; a 90-acre coal storage yard; and a 500-kilovolt substation that feeds electricity generated at the plant into Georgias Integrated Transmission System. The remaining 8,500 acres of property, which includes part of 3,600-acre Lake Juliette, also is essential to Plant Scherers purpose of producing electricity [5]. Site Visit On June 28, 2012, staff from GDPH and the North Central Health District conducted a site visit of Plant Scherer. Georgia Power employees presented on the history and operations at Plant Scherer with an emphasis on pollution control measures. Following the overview, public health staff were taken to the boiler and turbine/generator facility, then to the roof for a better view related operational infrastructure. This included the emission stacks, cooling towers, built-in scrubber houses used to remove sulfur dioxide, built-in selective catalytic reduction units used to remove nitrogen oxides, and baghouse units used to remove mercury from coal burning emissions. Georgia Power employees escorted staff by vehicle on the dike around the coal ash disposal pond. Throughout the facility property, construction material was stored and construction activity was taking place as part of the on-going pollution control upgrades that began in 2005 and is scheduled to be completed in 2014.

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Source: Georgia Power Company Brochure

How Electricity is Produced at Plant Scherer Plant Scherer operates on the same principles as other fossil-fueled electric generating plants. Coal that has been ground into a fine powder by a pulverizer is blown into a furnace-like device, called a boiler, and burned. The heat produced converts water, which runs through a series of pipes in the boiler, to steam. The high-pressure steam turns the blades of a turbine, which is connected by a shaft to a generator. The generator spins and produces electricity [5]. Each of the four turbines at Plant Scherer is powered by a boiler capable of producing 5.8 million pounds of steam per hour. With all four units in full operation, the boilers burn about 1,288 tons of coal an hour, or 11 million tons a year. The enormous amount of coal needed to operate Plant Scherer is kept in a storage and handling area next to the powerhouse. The plant has a sophisticated coal-handling system capable of unloading a 100-car train in a half-hour. The trains travel continuously between coal mines in Wyoming and the plant. An ample supply of coal is maintained at the site at all times, allowing the plant to continue operations should there be an interruption in coal deliveries. A condenser for each unit converts turbine exhaust steam back into water so it can be returned to the boiler for reuse in the steammaking process. In this closed cycle, the same water is used repeatedly [5].

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Source: Georgia Power Company Brochure

A separate loop of water drawn from Lake Juliette serves as coolant in the condensers. After its trip through the condensers, this cooling water is pumped through four huge cooling towers, each measuring 530 feet tall and 400 feet in diameter at the base, until it is cool enough to be run through the condensers again [5]. Each cooling tower circulates 268,000 gallons of water per minute in this continuous, closed-loop cycle, losing 8,000 gallons of that through evaporation. This lost cooling water constantly is replenished with more from the lake. Because the stream that feeds into Lake Juliette, Rum Creek, is too small to supply the water needed for Plant Scherers operation, a pumping station transfers additional water from the nearby Ocmulgee River to the lake. Pumping is done only when the river is high enough to keep downstream users from being affected. As electricity is generated at Plant Scherer, it is conducted to a power transformer in a adjacent substation, which increases the voltage. The high voltage electricity is then fed into transmission lines for distribution throughout the state [5]. Environmental Controls Plant Scherer was built under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys (EPA) New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), which are technologybased air pollution control standards for stationary sources of air pollution. NSPS sources that meet the Clean Air Act definition of major source, such as Plant Scherer, generally receive a full compliance evaluation by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GEPD) or EPAs regional office at least once every two years [6]. Samples of the plants coal supply are analyzed regularly to ensure it complies with state air-quality regulations. Electrostatics precipitators are used for high level particulate removal in the two 1000 feet and two 800 feet emission stacks to remove more than 99 percent of the fly ash from the flue gases that 5

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

leave the boiler after the coal-burning process. Opacity and gas monitors in the facilitys two 1,000-foottall stacks continually measure and record the plants emissions. The use of cooling towers and the closed-loop steam cycle prevent any thermal pollution of Lake Juliette or nearby streams or rivers. Georgia Power began construction on the Plant Scherer Solid Waste Disposal Facility (Permit No. 102009D (LI) to dispose of coal ash on October 2009. The site certification was submitted to GEPD in November 2010. During construction, Georgia Power conducted four background groundwater sampling events. Twenty monitoring wells were sampled for 16 metals and 5 field parameters [7]. The metals from 17 compliance and 3 background monitoring wells were compared to Georgia drinking water primary and secondary maximum contaminant limits (MCLs). No well tested above the Georgia primary or secondary drinking water standards for any constituent during background monitoring. Georgia Power began regular semiannual groundwater monitoring and reporting in 2011, with reports submitted to GEPD within 60 days of receiving laboratory data [7]. Waste Produced from Electricity Generating Operations Plant Scherer has four coal burning units that require flue gas desulfurization (FDG) units. The FGD units produce approximately 317,000 tons of gypsum per year [7]. In 2011, Plant Scherer released 50,488 tons of sulfur dioxide (SO2); 15,361 tons of nitrogen oxides (NOX), and 24,137,771 tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere [8]. These levels represent a 38% decrease in SO2 emissions, a 12% decrease in NOX emissions, and a 3% decrease in CO2 from2009 levels. Still, Plant Scherer is ranked the number one emitter of greenhouse gases in the United States. Coal combustion waste (CCW) generated by Plant Scherer in 2010 totaled 5,078,983 pounds coal ash waste according to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) [9] 1. This waste contained the following metals: arsenic, barium, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, thallium, vanadium, and zinc (Table 1). Acidic waste and styrene is also generated at Plant Scherer. Total waste generation at Plant Scherer totaled 5,936,071 pounds in 2010. The majority of CCW waste is disposed of in Plant Scherers unlined, on-site coal ash pond.

Table 1: Other Chemical Waste Generated from Plant Scherer Operations


Chemical Compounds Arsenic Compounds Barium Compounds Chromium Compounds Copper Compounds
1

On-site disposal 10,200 4,319,000 39,800 147,940

Off-site disposal 291 1,600 0 0

Total On- Off-site disposal 10,491 4,320,600 39,800 147,940

TRI is a publicly-accessible EPA database containing information on disposal and other releases of over 650 toxic chemicals from more than 20,000 U.S. industrial facilities. The database also includes information on how facilities manage chemicals through recycling, energy recovery and treatment. TRI was established in 1986 by Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act and later expanded by the Pollution Prevention Act of 1990.The goal of TRI is to provide communities with information about toxic chemical releases and waste management activities and to support informed decision-making by industry, government, non-governmental organizations and the public.

Plant Scherer Scoping Report


Hydrochloric acid Hydrogen Fluoride Lead Compounds Manganese Compounds Mercury Compounds Nickel Compounds Styrene Sulphuric acid Thallium Compounds Vanadium Compounds Zinc Compounds Total 270,000 540,000 26,528 131,600 729 53,260 36,088 11,000 57,952 151,500 87,100 5,931,937 0 0 644 0 768 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,133

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia


270,000 540,000 27,172 131,600 1,497 53,260 36,088 11,000 57,952 151,500 87,100 5,936,071

Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Toxics Release Inventory (reporting year 2010)

Demographics
Using 2010 U.S. Census data, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) calculated population information for individuals living within a 1-mile radius beyond the property boundary of Plant Scherer. The population within one mile of the perimeter of Plant Scherer is approximately 1,385 people in 582 households. In this population were 248 women of child-bearing age, 206 elderly and 120 children below age six. Figure 1 shows detailed demographic information.

Geology/Hydrogeology
Plant Scherer lies in the Southern Piedmont physiographic province between the Blue Ridge Mountains and the Upper Coastal Plain of Georgia. The Southern Piedmont is characterized by metamorphic bedrock composed of biotite gneiss, horneblend gneiss, granitic gneiss, and amphibolite. The Plant Scherer site is specifically characterized by heavily weathered bedrock (saprolite) overlying interbedded biotite gneiss and amphibolite [7]. The presence of saprolite indicate this area has been subjected to intense chemical weathering over time, with little or no physical weathering removing the resultant breakdown materials from their original location. The processes necessary to chemically weather the gneiss and amphibolite in this area would cause a release of any mobile metals present in the original metamorphic mineral structure. The type and distribution of metamorphic bedrock underlying Plant Scherer implies that a variable distribution of common and trace metals released by chemical weathering would be expected to occur [7]. Potentiometric surface and estimated groundwater flow path maps were generated during the background groundwater monitoring events conducted at Plant Scherer in 2010. These maps show groundwater flow across the site is generally to the south and southeast. Figure 2 shows detailed Potentiometric information.

Prevailing Wind Direction


Although GDPH has no direct prevailing wind information for Juliette, we have prevailing wind information pertaining to the state of Georgia. In 2006, the Georgia State Climatology Office, at the University of Georgia published their findings at the Georgia Air Quality and Climate Summit 2006 [10]. 7

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

In general, winter winds blow from the northwest over the continent to the southeast. In summer, prevailing winds tend to be from the southwest originating in the Gulf of Mexico blowing northeast. The figure below details seasonal wind directions in Georgia. The nearest seasonal wind rose data available is for the city of Macon, approximately 20 miles southeast of Juliette. Figure 3 details wind directions and average wind speeds.

Discussion
Environmental Sampling Data Air The GEPD has six ambient air monitoring stations throughout the state. The nearest ambient air monitoring station to Plant Scherer is located in Macon, approximately 20 miles to the southeast. No other ambient (off-site) air sampling data with QA/QC2 documentation are available for Plant Scherer. Therefore, the air pathway was not evaluated.

QA or Quality Assurance is a system of external review and audit procedures conducted by personnel not involved in the inventory development process. QA is an independent, objective review by a third party to assess the effectiveness of the QC program and the quality, completeness, accuracy, precision, and representativeness of the inventory. QC or Quality Control is a system of routine technical activities implemented to measure and control the quality of the inventory as it is being compiled. QC procedures include technical reviews, accuracy checks, and the use of approved standardized procedures.

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Groundwater Over the years, Georgia Power Company has conducted sampling and monitoring of groundwater on-site. There have been no leaks, spills, or other releases to groundwater that could affect public health reported to GEPD or GDPH. During construction of the on-site Solid Waste Disposal Facility, Georgia Power conducted four background groundwater sampling events using all 20 monitoring wells installed around the disposal facility in 2010. Monitoring wells were sampled for 16 metals and 5 field parameters [7]. Metals analyzed include: antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, vanadium, and zinc. The field parameters analyzed were: temperature, pH, conductivity, oxidation/reduction potential, dissolved oxygen, and total purge volume. The metals from 17 compliance and 3 background monitoring wells were compared to Georgia drinking water primary and secondary maximum contaminant limits (MCLs). No well tested above the Georgia primary or secondary drinking water standards for any constituent during background monitoring. In Monroe County, 237 private water samples have been analyzed for arsenic by the University of Georgia Cooperative Extension [11]. Arsenic was detected in 12 samples. Of the 12 samples, one slightly exceeded (10.4 ppb) the MCL of 10 ppb. Statewide, 719 drinking water samples were analyzed for arsenic and detected in 134 samples. Of those, 43 exceeded the MCL with concentrations above the MCL ranging from 10.2 to 122.4 ppb. In Monroe County, 699 private water samples have been analyzed for uranium by the University of Georgia Cooperative Extension [11]. Uranium was detected in 89 samples. Of the 89 samples, 38 exceeded the MCL of 30 ppb, ranging from 30.2 ppb to 1,549 ppb. Statewide, 980 drinking water samples were analyzed for uranium, and detected in 109 samples. Of those, 45 exceeded the MCL ranging from 30.2 ppb to 1,549 ppb. After reviewing local land use history, the GEPD Hazardous Site Inventory and EPA Superfund site lists, local hydrogeology, and conferring with experts, it has been determined that arsenic and uranium are naturally occurring at elevated levels in some areas of Georgia. However, these investigations continue and additional data for arsenic, uranium levels in groundwater will be reviewed by GDPH. In April, 2012, GEPD conducted a drinking water sampling event for drinking water wells located on Plant Scherer property [12]. Five drinking water wells were analyzed by EPA Methods 200.8 and 200.7 for 26 water quality metals (including uranium), and by EPA Method 245.1 for mercury. The approximate drinking well locations can be seen on Figure 4. No drinking water well tested above Georgia primary and secondary drinking water standards for any constituent tested. Mercury was not detected in any drinking water well sampled and uranium was detected in the Dames Ferry well at a concentration of 3.4 ppb; approximately 10 times lower than the MCL of 30 ppb [12].

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

The Monroe County Extension Office also collected samples for uranium from the same drinking water wells in April 2012 for separate analysis at the University of Georgias Agricultural and Environmental Services Laboratory. Uranium was not detected in any of the five samples [12]. In addition, GEPDs Environmental Radiation Program collected samples from the same drinking water wells in May 2012 for gross alpha and uranium radioactivity analysis. Gross alpha was detected in the Dames Ferry well at a concentration of 64 picocuries per liter (pCi/L) and uranium activity at 51 pCi/L [13]. These results validate GEPDs sample analysis for uranium in the Dames Ferry well; however, they are below federal and state MCLs for gross alpha (15 pCi/L) and 30 ppb for uranium. Surface water Tributaries to the Ocmulgee River occur on the site where the Solid Waste Disposal Facility was constructed. The Ocmulgee River is located approximately 3000 feet east of the Plant Scherer site boundary. To establish the lack of impact on surface water resources during construction of the permitted disposal facility, Georgia Power collected eight on-site surface water samples [12]. These eight sample locations are now sampled on a semi-annual basis in conjunction with the sampling of groundwater monitoring wells. Surface water samples are analyzed for the same 16 metals as groundwater sampling. In addition, four surface sampling locations are analyzed for chlorides, cyanide, total organic carbon, and chemical oxygen demand. Field parameters collected for all surface water sampling points include temperature, pH, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen [7]. In 2010, Georgia Power conducted four background surface water sampling events. No surface water sample tested above the Georgia Surface Water Quality Standards for any constituent during the background sampling event [7].

Conclusions
In order to determine if people are coming into contact with site-related chemicals from Plant Scherer, GDPH examines exposure pathways. GDPH identifies pathways of human exposure by identifying environmental and human components that might lead to contact with contaminants in environmental media (e.g., air, soil, and groundwater). A pathways analysis considers five principle elements: a source of contamination, transport through an environmental medium, a point of exposure, a route of human exposure, and a receptor population. Completed exposure pathways are those in which all five elements are present, and indicate that exposure to a contaminant has occurred in the past, is presently occurring, or will occur in the future. GDPH regards people who come into contact with contamination as exposed. For example, people who drink water known to be contaminated, or who work or play in contaminated soil are considered to be exposed to contamination. Potential exposure pathways are those for which exposure seems possible, but one or more of the elements is not clearly defined. Potential pathways indicate that exposure to a contaminant could have occurred in the past, could be occurring now, or could occur in the future. However, key information regarding a potential pathway may not be available. It should be noted that the identification of an exposure pathway does not imply that health effects will occur. Exposures may, or may not be substantive. Thus, even if exposure has occurred, human health effects may not necessarily result [14]. 10

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

For residents living near Plant Scherer, GDPH cannot determine whether exposures to contaminants in air are causing or contributing to illnesses because off-site air sampling has not been conducted at this site. Therefore, exposure to air emissions from Plant Scherer is considered a potential exposure pathway. However, based on emission reports from 2004 through 2010, there has been a steady decline in SO2 and NOx emissions from the facility. Additionally, GDPH cannot determine whether exposures to groundwater contaminants are causing or contributing to illnesses because we do not have groundwater sampling results from residential wells south and southeast of Plant Scherer (in the direction of groundwater flow), nor do we have residential sampling results north and northwest of the facility to establish background concentration of naturally occurring metals to compare downgradient concentrations with. Therefore, exposure to groundwater contamination from Plant Scherer is considered a potential exposure pathway. Based on groundwater sampling results that Georgia Power obtained during the permitting process for the Solid Waste Disposal Landfill and other drinking water sampling events, metals (including uranium) that have been detected are naturally occurring at this site, and most likely from the weathering of saprolite, gneiss, and amphibolite underlying the site. There is no indication that the public has been exposed to site-related surface water contaminants because surface water and fish sampling results do not show that surface water quality has been affected by plant operations.

Recommendations
1. If residents are concerned about exposure to contaminants released to air from plant operations, they should contact the GEPD Air Protection Branch, Stationary Source Compliance Program, at 404-363-7018, or their physician or other medical care provider. 2. GDPH will consult with ATSDR and other experts on air emissions, sampling, and modeling to determine whether additional data or other information is needed to evaluate whether a potential air exposure pathway exists at levels of health concern. 3. More residential well sampling data is needed north and northwest of Plant Scherer, as well as south and southeast of Plant Scherer in order to determine if site-related contaminants have impacted groundwater. 4. When additional groundwater data become available, GDPH will provide a health consultation that will evaluate all site-related and other Monroe county groundwater sampling data, applicable health outcome data, and community concerns.

11

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

References
1. Sepulvado, J. A Power Plant, Cancer and a Small Towns Fears. April 1, 2012. Retrieved June 11, 2012 from: http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/31/us/georgia-coal-power/index.html 2. Bonner, J. Plant Scherer Under Review. April 9, 2012. Retrieved June 11, 2012 from: http://www.gpb.org/news/2012/04/09/plant-scherer-under-review 3. Duncan, H. Plant Scherer Ash Pond Worries Neighbors as Georgia Power Buys, Levels Homes. April 14, 2012. Retrieved June 11, 2012 from: http://www.macon.com/2012/04/14/1990320/plant-scherer-ash-pond-worries.html 4. Duncan, H. Regulation of a Coal Ash Pond like Plant Scherers is Minimal. April 15, 2012. Retrieved June 11, 2012 from: http://www.macon.com/2012/04/15/1991493/regulation-of-coalash-ponds-like.html 5. Georgia Power Company. Plant Scherer Brochure/Final. Retrieved June 12, 2012 from: http://www.georgiapower.com/about/pdf/Plant%20sherer%20Brochure.pdf 6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. New Source Performance Standards and State Implementation Plans. Retrieved June 12, 2012 from: http://www.epa.gov/oecaerth/monitoring/programs/caa/newsource.html 7. Southern Company Generation Earth Science and Engineering. Georgia Power Company Plant Scherer Solid Waste Disposal Facility Permit No. 102-009D (LI) Background Groundwater Monitoring Report. October 2010 8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved June 19, 2012 from: http://ampd.epa.gov/ampd 9. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Toxics Release Inventory Reporting Year 2010. Retrieved June 14, 2012 from: http://iaspub.epa.gov/triexplorer/release_fac?zipcode=31046&p_view=ZPFA&trilib=TRIQ1&sor t=_VIEW_&sort_fmt=1&state=&city=&spc=&zipsrch=yes&chemical=All+chemicals&industry =ALL&year=2010&tab_rpt=1&fld=TRIID&fld=RELLBY&fld=TSFDSP 10. Knox, P. The State of Georgias Climate-Georgia Air Quality and Climate Summit 2006. Georgia State Climatology Office, University of Georgia Engineering. July 2006 11. University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service. Arsenic and Uranium in Drinking Water. Retrieved July 10, 2012 from: http://aesl.ces.uga.edu/water/asu.html 12. Georgia Environmental Protection Division. Plant Scherer Drinking Water Sampling ResultsApril 16, 2012 Sampling Event. April 2012 13. Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Environmental Radiation Program. Analysis of Gross Alpha and Uranium Activity by the Georgia Tech Research Institute. Georgia Institute of Technology. May 2012 14. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Public Health Assessment Guidance Manual (update). January 2005

12

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Authors and Reviewers

Author Franklin Sanchez, REHS Chemical Hazards Program Georgia Department of Public Health

Reviewer Jane M. Perry, MPH Chemical Hazards Program Georgia Department of Public Health

13

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Figure 1: Site Demographics Map

14

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Figure 2: Potentiometric Surface and Estimated Groundwater Flow Map

15

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Figure 3: December, April, July and October Wind Roses in Macon, GA

16

Plant Scherer Scoping Report

Juliette, Monroe County, Georgia

Figure 4: Drinking Water Sampling Locations, April 2012

17

You might also like