Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ph.D. SarahElaineEaton seaton@ucalgary.ca Virtual,byappointment 4032449015 September10December7,2012 OnlineutilizingBlackboardandElluminate SynchronousElluminatesessionswillbeheld: Wednesday,September12,201219:0020:00MountainTime Wednesday,October10,201219:0020:00MountainTime Wednesday,November14,201219:0020:00MountainTime PublicHolidays:October8,November12Noclasses/Elluminate
Note:
CalendarDescription Thisfirstcourseineducationalresearchmethodologiesprovidesthebackgroundnecessaryforintelligent decisionsaroundthekindsofresearchquestionsmightbeaskedandthesort(s)ofinsightsandanswers particularmethodscanprovide. ExtendedDescription ThisintroductorycourseisdesignedforgraduatestudentsinthefirstyearoftheircohortbasedMasters of Education programs. It focuses on various issues, methods, and techniques in educational research withaparticularemphasisonresearchinLanguagesandDiversity.Thecurriculumincludessomeofthe issues and dilemmas that frame the context for contemporary research, as well as preliminary consideration of research strategies, methods, and techniques in a manner intended to assist participantsinselectingresearchquestions,methods,andstrategiesforfurtherstudy.Participantswill alsobeencouragedtoapproachresearcharticlesandreportswithacriticaleyeandprovidesomeskills andtechniquesforthiskindofclosereading. The field of education sits at a point of intersection of many other domains including neurology, psychology, sociology, anthropology, and the many disciplines represented in various subject area specialties. This positioning compels a particular sort of methodological breadth across all programs in education. For that reason, it is not the purpose of the course to develop extensive technical (operational)competenceinanyparticularmethodofresearch.Rather,thebroaderaimistosupportan initial understanding of the nature and purpose of various approaches all of which are useful in understandingeducationalphenomena,thoughtheymayappeartodiffersubstantially. Overthepast50years,therehasbeenaproliferationoftheoriesandassociatedresearchmethodologies in the field of education. A principal aim of the course is to nurture a sort of methodological connoisseurship not by championing specific emphases and approaches, but by interrogating the
distinctions and commitments that are associated with various approaches to inquiry. To achieve this end, we should aim for a radical departure from traditional research methods courses that focus on clusters of specific methodologies. The emphasis here will be on the decisions, attitudes, and commitmentsthattakeonetoaparticularapproachandthatcompelcertainmethods. The guiding question/attitude is not How is this perspective or methodology different or wrong? which is deemed unproductive. After all, every frame is partial and can be found wanting. The orientationisthusmoretowardHowisthisperspectiveormethodologyright?Tothatend,amongthe simultaneousconsiderationsarethefollowing: Whatisthefocus(thesubject,object,phenomenon,unitofanalysis)ofinterest?Doesitchange?Ifso,at whatpace?Isitselftransformativeanddootheragentsorphenomena(e.g.,educatorsandresearchers) participateinitschange? CourseObjectives 1. To review the range of purposes for and products of educational research including the gatheringofempiricaldata,theapplicationoftheory,thegenerationoftheory,andthecritique oftheory. 2. To establish a basic literacy in research methodologies. Participants should be able to offer preliminary definitions of principal approaches to research in education and to distinguish among them according to phenomena examined, theoretical commitments, and relevance to theirownresearchinterests. 3. To appreciate that methodological breadth is better articulated in terms of complementarities than conflicts, recognizing that methods are developed in conversation with the phenomena they are intended to investigate. As such, any comparison of methods demands a range of questions,includingqueriesonwhatisbeingstudied,whoisdoingthestudying,thepurposesof study,thetimeframesoftheinquiry,etc.Detailsaroundtechnicaldifferencesamongmethods areatbestsecondaryconsiderationsinthisconversation. 4. To interrogate the personal prejudgments and methodological positionings that frame ones questions,orientonesselectionoftechniques,influencethedetailsonenotices,andaffectthe inferencesonedraws. 5. Tointroduceparticipantstotheissuesandchallengesofconductingethicalresearch. LearnerOutcomes Throughoutthecourseofstudystudentswillbeableto: 1. Identifyviableandinterestingresearchquestions,bothintheirownpotentialresearch endeavoursandintheworkofpublishedacademics 2. Identify,compareandcritiqueavarietyofeducationalresearchmethodologiesbasedontheir primaryassumptionsandmethods 3. Evaluatetherelevanceofeducationalresearchmethodologieswithspecialconsiderationbeing giventostatedresearchquestionsandtheknowledgebeingsought 4. Differentiatebetweenthecentraltenetsofqualitativeandquantitativedatacollectionand analysisstrategieswithspecialconsiderationbeinggiventothestrengths,weaknessesand relevanceofeachineducation 5. Assessthevalidityofavarietyofresearchmethods,bothqualitativeandquantitative,commonly usedineducation 6. Examineandinterrogatetherelationshipsbetweenresearchquestions,researchmethodsand interpretationoffindingsineducationalstudies
The following list is intended to provide a preliminary sense of the structure of the course. While the course has been planned in considerably more detail, the instructor is electing to present more fully developedplansasthecourseunfolds. 1. Epistemology,Ontology,Truth 2. PurposesofEducationalResearch 3. ObjectivityOrientedMethodologies:StatisticalMethods;ExperimentalandQuasiExperimental Research;GroundedResearch 4. SubjectivityOrientedMethodologies:Phenomenology;NarrativeInquiry;Autobiography 5. IntersubjectivityOrientedMethodologies:Hermeneutics;Ethnography 6. Interobjectivity(Participatory)OrientedMethodologies:ActionResearch;DesignBasedResearch 7. CriteriaofGoodResearch:Reliabilityvs.Reasonableness,Validityvs.Viability,Predictabilityvs. Practicality,Rigorvs.Relevance 8. MixedModesResearch 9. ResearchEthics CourseDesignandDelivery ThiscoursewilltakeplaceonlineviaBlackBoardandElluminate.Thismethodprovidesforexcellent opportunitiestodiscussanddebatethecomplexitiesofthevariousresearchmethodscommonthe educationalresearch,however,italsodemandsahighlevelofcommitmenttoBlackBoardpostsinorder tofullybenefitfromtheinformationbeingpresented.Whilethecoursehasbeendesignedwitha definitivestructureregardingtopicsfordiscussion,readingsandassignments,itshouldalsobe understoodthatstudentinterestswilldrivethedirectionofthecourseandsotopicsmay,inresponse, changeasneeded. Requiredtextsandreadings Creswell,J.W.(2009)Researchdesign:Qualitative,quantitative,andmixedmethodsApproaches(3rded). ThousandOaks,CA:Sage. BasicsofAPAStyle(Tutorial):http://www.apastyle.org/learn/tutorials/basicstutorial.aspx UniversityofCalgaryResearchServices:EthicsSupport,Online:http://www.ucalgary.ca/research/ethics UniversityofCalgaryConjointFacultiesResearchEthicsBoard(CFREB),Online: http://www.ucalgary.ca/research/compliance/cfreb TCPS2CORETutorial http://www.ucalgary.ca/research/ethics/CORE_Tutorial UofCGraduateStudiesCalendar(SectiononAcademicHonestyandPlagiarism) http://www.ucalgary.ca/pubs/calendar/current/k21.html
PublicationmanualoftheAmericanPsychologicalAssociation(6thed)(2009).Washington,DC:American PsychologicalAssociation:Author. Books Edwards,M.G.(2010)Chapter1:Theneedformetatheoryinthestudyoforganisationaltransformation. Organizationaltransformationforsustainability:anintegralmetatheory(pp.1025).NewYork: Routledge. Denzin,N.K.,&Lincoln,Y.S.(2005)TheSagehandbookofqualitativeresearch(4thed).ThousandOaks, CA:Sage. Mertens,D.M.(2005)Researchandevaluationineducationandpsychology(2nded.).ThousandOaks,CA: Sage. Slavin,R.E.(2007)Educationalresearchinanageofaccountability.Boston:Pearson. Suter,W.N.(2012).IntroductiontoEducationalResearch:ACriticalThinkingApproach(2nded.). ThousandOaks,CA:Sage. Articles(Note:AllofthesearticlescanbeaccessviatheUofClibrary) Bredo,E.(2009).CommentsonHowe:Gettingoverthemethodologywars.EducationalResearcher, 38(6),441448,Retrievedfromhttp://edr.sagepub.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca Davis,B.,&Sumara,D.J.(2005).Challengingimagesofknowing:Complexityscienceandeducational research.InternationalJournalofQualitativeStudiesinEducation,18(3),305321.Retrievedfrom http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/ehost Pole,K.(2007).Mixedmethoddesigns:Areviewofstrategiesforblendingquantitativeandqualitative methodologies.MidWesternEducationalResearcher,20(4),3538.Retrievedfrom http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/ehost
ClassContent Introductions,course organizationandexpectations ClassIntroductions QuestionBank: Whydowereferenceandcite others? WhatimpactdoesAPAhaveon youasaresearcher? Howwillyoulearntherigorous styleofAPAforyourcitations, referencesandpapers? Whatareethicsandwhydo theymatter? Whatareexamplesofthetypes ofresearchthatwould(and wouldnot)haveethical considerations?
Reading/AssignmentsDue Seereadinglistforthisweek. BasicsofAPAStyle(Tutorial): http://www.apastyle.org/learn /tutorials/basicstutorial.aspx UofCGraduateStudies Calendar(SectiononAcademic HonestyandPlagiarism) http://www.ucalgary.ca/pubs/c alendar/current/k21.html UniversityofCalgaryResearch Services:EthicsSupport, Online: http://www.ucalgary.ca/resear ch/ethics UniversityofCalgaryConjoint FacultiesResearchEthicsBoard (CFREB),Online: http://www.ucalgary.ca/resear ch/compliance/cfreb TCPS2CORETutorial http://www.ucalgary.ca/resear ch/ethics/CORE_Tutorial
Week3 Sept.24
Week6 Oct.15
Elluminate session
Week8 Oct.29
Week9 Nov.5
10
LearningTask#1
DiscussionBoardParticipation Duedate:Ongoing
10%
Individual
LearningTask#2
20%
Group
LearningTask#3
20%
Group
LearningTask#4
20%
Individual
LearningTask#5
30%
Individual
10
11
EpistemicAgency
IdeaDiversity
DeeperScholarly Discourse:MeetsAlland ExceedsSome Requirements(AtoA+) Youcriticallyevaluate Youdrawuponcontent informationsourcesand fromthereadingsand recognizethateventhe experiences,alongwith bestarefallible. additionalinformation sources,asdatafor his/herownknowledge buildingandideas improvingprocesses. Yourecognizeandpraise Youtreatallparticipants othersworkandhelp aslegitimate yourclassmatesfind contributorstothe neededinformation. sharedgoalsofthe community;allhavea senseofownershipof knowledgeadvances achievedbythegroup. Youmobilizepersonal Youmobilizepersonal strengthstosetforth strengthstosetforth yourideasandto yourideasandto negotiateafitbetween negotiateafitbetween personalideasandideas personalideasandideas ofothers. ofothers,usingcontrasts tosparkandsustain knowledgeadvancement ratherthandepending onotherstochartthat courseforyou. Youplayanactiverolein Youplayanactiverolein puttingforwarddifferent puttingforwarddifferent ideastocreatea ideastocreatea dynamicenvironment. dynamicenvironmentin whichcontrasts, competition,and complementarityof ideasisevident,creating arichenvironmentfor ideastoevolveintonew andmorerefinedforms.
Democratizing Knowledge
11
12
2) LearningTask2Presentationofaresearchmethodology(20%) Smallgroupassignment(2to4pergroup)Insmallgroups,research,summarize,selectexemplars for, present on, and lead a discussion of a prominent methodology in contemporary educational research.Thepresentationwillbegradedaccordingtothecriteriaofthoroughnessofpreparation, clarity of presentation/demonstrated understanding, development of supporting materials (for distributiontoclassmates),andselectionofexemplars(e.g.,article,demonstration). ThediscussionsforthisLearningTaskwillbeconductedasynchronouslyonBlackboard.Studentsare expectedtoviewandcommentonallpresentations. Duedate:Sunday,September30at11:59p.m.MountainTime
KnowledgeBuilding Discourse
12
13
Insight
Youclearlyandaccurately articulate(describe)the researchmethodology. Yousummarize,provide exemplarsandleada classdiscussiononthe methodology.You demonstrateaclear understandingofthe methodology. Youprovide supplementarymaterials toyourclassmates. Youhaveprovidedanin depth,introspective presentationofthe researchmethodology.
IdeasandContent
13
14
OrganizationandStructure
Sources
Clarity,simplicity, parsimonyand appropriateEnglish characterizethe presentation.Itcanbe easilyreadand understood. Writingandpresentation styleisengagingand thoughtprovoking.
Presentation
14
15
3) LearningTask3Introductionofacomprehensivetextofresearchmethodologies(20%) Small group assignment (2 to 4 per group) In small groups, select, analyze, and report on a comprehensive educational research methodology text(book). The principal intention here is to becomefamiliarwithsomeofthewidearraytotextsthathavebeendevelopedtointroducenew researchers to this domain of inquiry and to guide their investigations. The presentation will be gradedaccordingtothecriteriaofthoroughnessofintroduction,demonstrationofcriticalawareness of authorial prejudgments and positionings, and quality of onepage overview (for distribution to classmates). Duedate:Sunday,October14at11:59p.m.MountainTime CriteriaforAssessmentforLearningTask3 Criteria SurfaceScholarly MeetsAllRequirements DeeperScholarly Interpretation:Doesnot (B+toA) Interpretation:MeetsAll meetrequirements(Bto andExceedsSome B) Requirements(AtoA+) Youprovideaclearbutat Youclearlyandaccurately Youprovideanaccurate, timesinaccurate articulateintroducethe thickintroductiontothe descriptionofthe comprehensivetextof comprehensivetextof comprehensivetextof researchmethodologies. researchmethodologies. researchmethodologies; oryourpresentationlacks Youdemonstrateaclear Youdemonstrate precisionandfocus. understandinganda exemplarycritical criticalawarenessofthe awarenessofauthorial Yourworkdemonstrates ofthecomprehensive prejudgementsand littlecriticalawareness. textofresearch positionings. methodologies. Youronepagesummary Youprovideaconcise iseithermissingorpoorly Youprovideahigh exemplaryonepage done,oritisnotposted qualityonepage overviewtoclassmatesin in.docor.pdfformat. overviewtoclassmatesin .docor.pdfformat. .docor.pdfformat. IdeasandContent
15
16
Sources
Clarity,simplicity, parsimonyand appropriateEnglish characterizethe presentation.Itcanbe easilyreadand understood. Writingandpresentation styleisengagingand thoughtprovoking.
Presentation
16
17
4) LearningTask4Introductionofaneducationalresearchjournal(20%) Thisisanindividualassignment.Individually,select,analyze,andreportonaneducationalresearch journal,whosearticlesareaccessibleonlineviatheUCalgarylibraryorareopensource. Theprincipalintentionhereisengagecriticallywiththemannerinwhichjournalscontributetothe waysacceptableclaimsmustbeformattedwithinafield. This presentation will be graded according to the criteria of thoroughness of introduction, demonstration of critical awareness of journal purposes and positionings, and quality of onepage overview(fordistributiontoclassmates). Duedate:Sunday,November19,2012at11:59p.m.MountainTime CriteriaforAssessmentforLearningTask4 Criteria SurfaceScholarly MeetsAllRequirements DeeperScholarly Interpretation:Doesnot (B+toA) Interpretation:MeetsAll meetrequirements(Bto andExceedsSome B) Requirements(AtoA+) Assignmentdoesnot Providesaclearrationale Providesaclearrationale includeaclearrationale forselectingacurrent forselectingacurrent forselectingaparticular andauthentic andauthentic journal. conference/journal. conference/journal. ProvidesanactiveURLfor NoactivejournalURLhas theselectedconference ProvidesanactiveURLfor theselectedconference beenprovided. orjournal. orjournal. Youronepagesummary Youprovideahigh Yourworkclearlyadheres iseithermissingorpoorly qualityonepage toallwritingguidelines done,oritisnotposted overviewtoclassmatesin anddemonstrates in.docor.pdfformat. .docor.pdfformat. excellenceinprofessional writing. Youprovideaconcise exemplaryonepage overviewtoclassmatesin .docor.pdfformat. IdeasandContent
17
18
OrganizationandStructure
Insight
Sources
Clarity,simplicity, parsimonyand appropriateEnglish characterizethe presentation.Itcanbe easilyreadand understood. Writingandpresentation styleisengagingand thoughtprovoking.
Presentation
18
19
5) LearningTask5NarrativeSituatingandEmergingResearchCommitments(Finalpaper)(30%) This is an individual assignment. In this 1015page document, you will begin to situate your interests,experiences,andexpertiserelativeto: i. ii. iii. thesortsofresearchintereststhatyoucurrentlyhave, themethodologicalconsiderationsthataccompanythatinterest,and the theoretical and ethical considerations that might arise in pursuit of greater understandingofthatinterest.
The paper will be graded according to the criteria of the relevance of narrative situating, the appropriateness and comprehensiveness links made to the research literature, and clarity and thoroughnessofthewrittensubmission. Duedate:Friday,December7atat11:59p.m.MountainTime
19
20
IdeasandContent
20
21
21
22
DistributionofGrades
Graduate Description Outstanding Excellent - superior performance showing comprehensive understanding of the subject matter Very good performance Good performance Satisfactory performance Note: The grade point value (3.0) associated with this grade is the minimum acceptable average that a graduate student must maintain throughout the program as computed at the end of each year of the program. Minimum pass for students in the Faculty of Graduate Studies
All grades below B- are indicative of failure at the graduate level and cannot be counted toward Faculty of Graduate Studies course requirements.
22
23
23