You are on page 1of 5

1.

Cross tabs
Case Processing Summary Cases Valid N Respondent's Sex * HOME DISTRICT 194 Percent 97.0% N 6 Missing Percent 3.0% N 200 Total Percent 100.0%

Respondent's Sex * HOME DISTRICT Crosstabulation Count HOME DISTRICT DHAKA Respondent's Sex Male Female Total 20 13 33 CHITTAGONG 32 30 62 SYLHET 42 24 66 KHULNA 18 5 23 RAJSHAHI 6 4 10 Total 118 76 194

Chi-Square Tests Asymp. Sig. (2Value Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases 5.365a 5.570 1.788 194 df 4 4 1 sided) .252 .234 .181

a. 1 cells (10.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.92.

Remarks on major observations: The strength of association between the variables gender and home district is measured as 5.365. At a significance of .252, a statement of no association can be made. In other words, there would be at least 25.2% error to rule out this association as zero.

2. Independent T-test

Group Statistics Responde nt's Sex monthly income Male Female N 122 78 Mean 15276.64 9118.59 Std. Deviation 6405.528 1618.543 Std. Error Mean 579.929 183.264

Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Sig. (2F monthly income Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed 10.125 144.11 5 .000 6158.050 608.197 4955.911 7360.189 134.404 Sig. .000 t 8.316 df 198 tailed) Mean Std. Error Lower Upper 7618.416

Difference Difference

.000 6158.050

740.544 4697.684

Here, the t-value is positive and we are testing a right-tailed test, so we can consider rejecting the H0 that salary of male and female are same. Now, the P-value is is 0.000 which is less than 0.05. So we can reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that on an average, males get more salary than females do.

3. One-way Anova

ANOVA monthly income Sum of Squares Between Groups Within Groups Total 3.131E8 6.228E9 6.541E9 df 4 189 193 Mean Square 7.829E7 3.295E7 F 2.376 Sig. .054

Here we can see that p-value is .054. Since it is more that significance level of 0.05, we cannot reject the hypothesis that people from same districts get same salary.

4. Regression

Model Summary Adjusted R Model 1 R .030a R Square .001 Square -.004 Std. Error of the Estimate .948

a. Predictors: (Constant), Respondent's Sex Interpretation: R Square = .001 shows that only 0.01% of Satisfication level can be explained by Gender.

ANOVAb Model 1 Regression Residual Total Sum of Squares .165 177.835 178.000 df 1 198 199 Mean Square .165 .898 F .183 Sig. .669a

a. Predictors: (Constant), Respondent's Sex b. Dependent Variable: Satisfied with service of embassy Significance = .669 means the overall regression is not significant.

Coefficientsa Standardize Unstandardized Coefficients d Coefficients Lower Model 1 (Constant) Respondent's Sex a. Dependent Variable: Satisfied with service of embassy B 1.318 .059 Std. Error .202 .137 .030 Beta t 6.513 .428 Sig. .000 .669 Bound .919 -.212 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Upper Bound 1.717 .330

Interpretation: .330 means respondents gender has no significant influence on Satisfaction level.

5. Frequency Table

years Cumulative Frequency Valid 11.00 22.00 33.00 44.00 55.00 Total 2 44 125 28 1 200 Percent 1.0 22.0 62.5 14.0 .5 100.0 Valid Percent 1.0 22.0 62.5 14.0 .5 100.0 Percent 1.0 23.0 85.5 99.5 100.0

You might also like