Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your assignment should be prepared individually. You should not copy another persons assignment. You should also not plagiarise another persons work as your own. PENILAIAN / EVALUATION Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 40% daripada jumlah markah kursus berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik yang dilampirkan. / This assignment accounts for 40% of the total marks for the course and shall be assessed based on the Rubrics attached . Anda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan Akhir Semester bermula. / You would be given feedback on the assignment before the Final Semester Examination commences. PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan, secara automatik, akan disemak untuk menentukan kadar pertindihan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong seperti berikut: / Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. If plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows: Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 10 - 30%: potongan 20% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 31 - 50%: potongan 40% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan lebih daripada 50%: Markah sifar akan diberikan. Assignments with 10 - 30 % overlap with others: 20% deduction from the total marks scored. Assignments with 31 - 50 % overlap with others: 40% deduction from the total marks scored. Assignments with more than 50% overlap with others: Zero mark would be given.
PURPOSE The purpose of this assignment is to develop learners ability to discuss the process of evaluating journal articles in a literature review. REQUIREMENT Discuss the processes involved in evaluating journal articles in a literature review. _________________________________________________________________________
Low Criteria Weigh t 0 1 Introduction gave unclear and incomplete definition, reasons why a literature review is needed in a research study were not given. Description did not explain reasons why writing a literature review is important when conducting a research study. No examples given. Discussion was insufficient and not clearly explained on the processes involved in evaluating journal articles in a literature review. Steps were not in the correct sequence. No relevant examples cited. Unclear summary and no highlights of the assignment were given.
Fair 2 Introduction gave unclear and incomplete definition and two reasons why a literature review is needed in a research study were given. Description insufficiently and does not clearly explain reasons why writing a literature reviews is important when conducting a research study. Examples were not clear and not relevant. Discussion was sufficient but not clearly explained on the processes involved in evaluating journal articles in a literature review. Steps were in the correct sequence. No relevant examples were cited. Unclear summary of a few of the highlights of the assignment were given.
Above average 3 Introduction gave clear but incomplete definition and three reasons why a literature review is needed in a research study given. Description insufficiently but clearly explained reasons why writing a literature review is important when conducting a research study. Examples were clear but not relevant. Discussion sufficiently and clearly explained on the processes involved in evaluating journal articles in a literature review. Steps were in the correct sequence. No relevant examples were cited. Clear and concise summary of some of the highlights of the assignment were given. 3 references were cited and listed according to APA format.
Excellent 4 Introduction gave clear and detailed definition, and three reasons why a literature review is needed in a research study was given. Description of the importance of writing a literature review when conducting a research study was sufficient and clearly explained. Adequate reasons and examples were given to support the argument. Discussion was sufficiently and clearly explained on the processes involved in evaluating journal articles in a literature review. Steps were in the correct sequence. All relevant examples were cited. Clear and concise summary of all the main highlights of the assignment were given.
Max Mark s
1.5
No introduction given.
No description given.
12
3.5
No discussion given.
14
Summary
No summary given.
1 10
No references given.
4 40