Supplier: Supplier code: Part name: Part number: Index of change:

APQP steps 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1 Project Data / Customer Inputs Are all requirements of the customer available and described (dates, quality, etc.)? Is a demand planning of the customer available (ramp schedule)?

APQP checklist
Aktivities Start End 10 20 30 40 Progress [%] 50 60 70 80 90 100 R / Y / G Remarks

2. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
2 Drawing & Specifications Are type and extent as well as availability, feasibility and up-to-dateness of the documents OK? Are drawings available and released? Are all characteristics for inspection and the frequency defined?

3. FEASIBILITY
3 Feasibility Commitment Are feasibility studies carried out (single parts & saleable units) taking into account potential new materials and new technologies (chances and risks)? Are risk evaluations performed (FMEA among other things)? Were feasibility-meetings carried out with participation of development, production and QA? Is the production manufacturing location fixed? Is the construction appropriate for mounting and for manufacture? Is application of proven production processes possible or is a development of the process planned in case of a new one? Does the present drawing have a level, which is feasible regarding production engineering and measurment technology?

4. SUBCONTRACTORS
4 Subcontractor APQP Status Are coordination meetings (timing, quality) with subsuppliers successfull? Are the product specifications for the subsupplier provided (e.g. TL)? Are project milestones defined with the subsuppliers for the gradual purpose reaching? Are the milestones feasible and OK (delivery reliability of all purchase parts related to quantities, dates)? Do dimensional results meet drawing requirements? Is release of product possible? In case of firmness-critical purchase parts, are the essential characteristic values specific for material determined from strain tests? Are acrivities defined for progress check? Is supplier visit necessary for initial sampling (if so, related to which parts)? Is defined, related to which parts a Run@Rate will be performed at the supplier? Does the Run@Rate performed at the supplier meet the quoted requirements? Are logistics plans with the suppliers agreed and feasible?

5. TOOLS AND MEASUREMENTS

5 Capabilities, Tools, Gauges and Capability of Measurement Systems Are all gages and test systems accepted by QA and are they capable (documents)?

6. PROCESS DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT

6 Process Flow Chart, Floor Plan Layout Is a process flowchart available? What is the degree of performance of the process FMEA? Process Instructions / Control Plan Do all inspection characteristics (CC- and SC-criteria) for the product / process exist, are they documented at the working plan (100% ckecks), the drawing as well as the inspection plan for the series? Are the following documents available, do they have the current level and are they released: maintenance plans, work instructions, test specifications (PVs), control plans, packaging 8 Logistics Are the requirements for packaging of the saleable unit defined? Is the raw material procurement planned?

7. APPROVAL OF PART AND PROCESS

9 Production Trial Run (Run@Rate) Was a production trial run (Run@Rate) carried out and are all resulting actions realized?

10 Process Capability Study Are all machine capability studies and temporary process capability studies carried out and OK or were corresponding actions implemented (documents)? Is a CPk reached 1.33, or if not - how do you ensure that quality requirements are met. In this case, appropriate measures were taken (documents)? 11 Production Part Approval Name of form: KEI-checklist-APQP-en Version: 01

Hazard level: G2

Page 1 of 2

Supplier: Supplier code: Part name: Part number: Index of change:

APQP steps
Has initial sampling been submitted to the customer and is it accepted from both sides? 12 SOP Is a demand planning of the customer available? Does a staff demand planning exist? Are all employees in action trained for the processes (qualification matrix)? Responsible: Supplier: WEBER:
Name Signature Date of evaluation

APQP checklist
Aktivities Start End 10 20 30 40 Progress [%] 50 60 70 80 90 100 R / Y / G Remarks

R = Red (behind schedule & affected to customer critical timing) Y = Yellow (behind schedule; unaffected to customer critical timing) G = Green (on schedule)

Name of form: KEI-checklist-APQP-en Version: 01

Hazard level: G2

Page 2 of 2