Professional Documents
Culture Documents
French counterpart Pierre Moscovici are working on a New Deal for Europe, but its clear that Europes youth program is no such thing. The core of the effort is 6 billion ($7.7 billion) carved out of the EUs budget. Some of that (its unclear how much) would go to the European Investment Bank, which would back loans to small and midsize enterprises in exchange for commitments to hire and train young people. Some would go to helping young people move to find training and jobs; Germany and other countries have 30,000 unfilled apprenticeships. Banks in Spain, Greece, and elsewhere arent lending, so this kind of subsidy makes sense. Yet the scale is far too small. Millions of new jobs are needed, and the initiative falls short. Youth unemployment has been rising faster than overall unemployment for decades. Dealing with it will require multiple approachesGerman-style apprenticeships, Danish-style retraining, British-style deregulation, and, most important, addressing lending inequality. A small or midsize business in Northern Italy pays 2.5 percentage points more for a loan than a rival across the border in Austria, says EIB President Werner Hoyer. Only a banking union can address this problem in the long term. The issue is obviously complex and hard to handle. A recent paper by economists David Blanchflower and Andrew Oswald suggests, for example, that Spains 80 percent homeownership rate is a factor: Lack of rental accommodation forces young people to live with their parents rather than move to where the jobs are. It is thought that tax incentives for Spaniards to rent out their spare rooms might provide a quick remedy. Better labor market policies are all to the good, but itll take more demand and faster growth to reduce youth joblessness. If Schuble really wants a fix, the main thing he should do hasnt changed: reflate Germanys economy to create demand for exports from the periphery and form a true banking union. Outside the Euro Zone but inside Europe The lower house of Switzerland's parliament voted against adopting a plan for banks to step around the Alpine nation's banking secrecy laws and hand information about their dealings with suspected American tax evaders to U.S. authorities in an attempt to reach a sweeping resolution. The vote sends the measure back to the upper house, which approved it last week, for further debate. The proposed plan would have many of the country's roughly 300 banks start providing details to the U.S. Department of Justice about their past relationships with American clients and the employees who assisted those clients. The Swiss cabinet, which announced the plan last month, cautioned Parliament to act swiftly to approve itimplying that if banks don't come forward now, U.S. authorities may ultimately come down hard on them with indictments and heavy fines. Wegelin & Co., Switzerland's oldest bank, was hit with a U.S. indictment last year and is now defunct. Critics have called the plan a violation of Swiss sovereignty, which unfairly exposes local bankers, advisers and attorneys to legal prosecution in the U.S. Critics have also said the plan lacks important details on the potential size of fines for the banks that opt to participate. About a dozen banks have already been under investigation by U.S. authorities, including Credit Suisse Group AG and Julius Baer 2
Group AG. Those banks have begun handing over information as part of the U.S. crackdown on American tax evasion. UBS AG, the country's biggest bank, resolved its issues with the DOJ with a deferred prosecution agreement in 2009. Credit Suisse has already set aside 295 million Swiss francs ($319.8 million) to deal with the U.S. tax probe. Julius Baer hasn't made a specific provision, but analysts generally estimate the Zurich-based bank could be hit with fines ranging from 200 million francs to 500 million francs. Swiss officials have said the country remains unable to hand over such detailed information on clients until the U.S. Senate passes a 2009 amendment to a long-standing tax treaty between the countries. The flood zone of Central Europe The European Union in recent days has been quick to pledge rapid aid to Germany and other Central European countries as they seek to battle record flooding this week. But on Wednesday, European Budget Commissioner Janusz Lewandowski said that the promises may have been a bit premature. The bloc's Solidarity Fund, he said, is empty. "The scale of the catastrophe is absolutely beyond the reimbursement (possible) in these countries. We are without resources, for sure, for the European Solidarity Fund," Lewandowski told journalists in Brussels on Wednesday. "In 2013 it is not possible." In addition, the EU will not be able to produce the amount of aid requested by the United Nations for Syria, the commissioner said. The UN recently asserted that the war-torn country was in need of at least 3 billion. "There is a big effort (from the EU), but certainly not to the amount the UN is expecting," Lewandowski said. The shortage is a direct result of the budget gridlock that has been plaguing the European Union in recent months. The EU has been trying without success to agree on a budget for the seven-year period from 2014 to 2020. Although the size of the Solidarity Fund for 2013 is not explicitly up for discussion, the European Commission has asked member states for supplementary funding of 11.2 billion to cover expenses from both this year and last year. Member states have balked at the amount and have offered instead to provide 7.3 billion -- but only if the European Parliament climbs down from its hard-line position in ongoing budget negotiations. EU leaders agreed to a slimmed-down 2014-2020 budget in February, well below the over 1 trillion the Commission had originally asked for. But the European Parliament rejected the compromise in March. Date: 30.06.2013