You are on page 1of 2

ARC 2213 ASIAN ARCHITECTURE PROJECT 1 LITERATURE REVIEW FINAL ESSAY MARKING SHEET (20%) Name Tutor : :

CRITERIA Content (40%)

1 Unsatisfactory No evidence of thesis statement

2 Developing Has written a thesis statement (at least inferable), using appropriate language (although not necessarily with the best choice of words); may use passive voice verb(s) Consequences of issue are vague or confusing

3 Satisfactory Has written a thesis statement (at least inferable), using appropriate language (although not necessarily with the best word choice); at least one active verb At least one consequences of the issue is presented

4 Proficient Has an understandable thesis statement, using some strong language, active verb(s), and appropriate descriptive words and / or phrases

5 Excellent Has a clear thesis statement, using strong language, active verb(s), and appropriate descriptive words and / or phrases

TOTAL (100%)

Consequences of the issue are absent

Short and long term implications of this issue are presented

Short and long terms implications of issue are clearly outlined and linked together Two or more thoughtful discussions and/or recommendations are convincingly presented Details and ideas are carefully arranged to add interest and clarity Ideas and details build towards a convincing argument for the discussion and recommendations Sentences are clear, complete and of varying lengths. Writing is interesting and convincing

Discussions and/or recommendations are absent or confusing

Discussions and/or recommendations are absent or inappropriate

One general discussion and/or recommendation is presented

One or two appropriate discussions and/or recommendations are presented Details and ideas are well organized with a beginning, middle and end Ideas generally relate to the discussions and recommendations being presented Sentences are complete and well-constructed. There are attempts at making the writing interesting

Organization (20%)

Arrangement of details and ideas is confusing

Arrangement of details and ideas is unclear

Details and ideas are roughly arranged in a workable order Writing is sometimes off topic

Ideas are aimless and unconnected

Writing is very disorganized and few ideas are connected

Many run-ons, fragments and awkward phrasings making it hard to read the paper

Sentences are often awkward and/or contain run-ons and fragments

Sentences are generally well constructed but there may be one or two runon, fragments or awkward sentences

Writing Conventions (20%)

Communication is unclear due to many errors

Communication is occasionally interrupted by the errors made

Communication is generally clear despite some errors

There are a couple of spelling, punctuation and/or grammatical errors Uses at least 4 sources evenly in the paper Paper has no more than 2 parenthetical errors Paper has no more than 4 cited page errors according to APA guidelines

Correct spelling, punctuation and grammar

No evidence of sources APA Citations (20%) Paper has more than 4 parenthetical errors Paper has more than 8 cited page error according to APA guidelines

Uses at least 2 sources evenly in the paper Paper has no more than 4 parenthetical errors Paper has no more than 8 cited page errors according to APA guidelines

Uses at least 3 sources evenly in the paper Paper has no more than 3 parenthetical errors Paper has no more than 6 cited page errors according to APA guidelines

Uses at least 5 sources evenly in the paper Paper has no more than 1 parenthetical error Paper has no more than 2 cited page errors according to APA guidelines

Comments (if any):

You might also like