Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.
N
(a) (i) X
102
100,
25
' N (100, 4)
6 X + 1.0X )
P (X 1.8X 6 X
X 1.8X X
X + 1.0X X
= P
6Z6
X
X
= P (1.8 6 Z 6 1)
= P (0 < Z < 1.8) + P (0 < Z < 1)
= 0.4641 + 0.3413 = 0.8054
N
(ii) X
25
100,
n
X =
n
5
1.5 =
n
2
5
n =
= 11.1111 12
1.5
0.52(0.48)
(b) P1 N 0.52,
' N (0.52, 0.002496)
100
0.47(0.53)
P2 N 0.47,
' N (0.47, 0.002491)
100
P1 P2 N (0.05, 0.004987)
SSE2193
2.
r
0.03(0.97)
0.03(0.97)
0.03 1.6449
6 6 0.03 + 1.6449
200
200
0.03 0.0198 6 6 0.03 + 0.0198
0.0102 6 6 0.0498
3.
H0 : 1 = 2 versus H1 : 1 6= 2
60
75
= 0.8333; P2 =
= 0.6667;
P1 =
90
90
x1 + x2
75 + 60
PP =
=
= 0.75
n1 + n2
90 + 90
P1 P2
1
1
PP (1 PP )
+
n1 n2
0.8333 0.6667
= s
1
1
+
0.75(0.25)
90 90
= 2.5810
ztest = s
,
f0.01,A ,B
s2A f0.01,B ,A s2A
18.1667
1
18.1667
,
f0.01,6,5
11.1429 f0.01,5,6 11.1429
(0.1863, 17.3957)
2
SSE2193
s2A
s2B
11.1429
18.1667
= 0.6134
As ftest = 0.6134, thus 0.1143 < ftest < 10.67, hence we fail to reject H0 and
conclude that there is no significant difference in the variability of assembly time
between the two shifts.
Answer in part (a) further supports this conclusion as the 98% confidence interval
contains the ratio of 1.
or
The answer in (a) is consistent with the statement in (b).
(c) Additional assumption: A2 = B2
Thus,
s2p
(7 1)11.1429 + (6 1)18.1667
7+62
= 14.3355
= 3.7862
=
sp
SSE2193
ttest
xA xB 0
r
1
1
+
sp
nA nB
18.8571 24.8333
r
1 1
3.7862
+
7 6
= 2.8369
=
As ttest = 2.8369 < 2.718, we reject H0 and conclude that the shift A employees work significantly faster than that of shift B counterparts, at = 0.01.
(d) Yes.
5.
P ()
P (Z < 1.82) = 0.0344
P (X > 70)
SSE2193
Oi
Ei = nP (i)
(Oi Ei )2
Ei
O1 = 8
E1 = 194(0.0344) = 6.67
(8 6.67)2
= 0.2652
6.67
O2 = 26
E2 = 194(0.1470) = 28.52
(26 28.52)2
= 0.2227
28.52
O3 = 59
E3 = 194(0.3186) = 61.81
(59 61.81)2
= 0.1277
61.81
O4 = 67
E4 = 194(0.3186) = 61.81
(67 61.81)2
= 0.4358
61.81
O5 = 30
E5 = 194(0.1470) = 28.52
(30 28.52)2
= 0.0768
28.52
O6 = 4
E6 = 194(0.0344) = 6.67
(4 6.67)2
= 1.0688
6.67
2test = 2.1970
At = 0.05, reject H0 if 2test > 2, (= 11.070)
Since 2test = 2.1970 < 20.05,5 = 11.070, thus, we fail to reject H0 and conclude
that the thickness of all sunscreen films follows normal distribution with mean of
60 107 mm and standard deviation 5.5 107 mm.
SSE2193
Oij
(Oij Eij )2
Eij
Eij
O11 = 38 E11 =
90(74)
= 33.30
200
(38 33.30)2
= 0.6634
33.30
O12 = 18 E12 =
56(74)
= 20.72
200
(18 20.72)2
= 0.3571
20.72
O13 = 18 E12 =
54(74)
= 19.98
200
(18 19.98)2
= 0.1962
19.98
O21 = 34 E21 =
90(72)
= 32.40
200
(34 32.40)2
= 0.0790
32.40
O22 = 22 E22 =
56(72)
= 20.16
200
(22 20.16)2
= 0.1679
20.16
O23 = 16 E22 =
54(72)
= 19.44
200
(16 19.44)2
= 0.6087
19.44
O31 = 18 E31 =
90(54)
= 24.30
200
(18 24.30)2
= 1.6333
24.30
56(54)
= 15.12
=
200
(16 15.12)2
= 0.0512
15.12
54(54)
= 14.58
200
(20 14.58)2
= 2.0148
14.58
O32 = 16 E32
O33 = 20 E22 =
2test = 5.7716
At = 0.05, reject H0 if 2test > 2, (= 9.488)
Since 2test = 5.7716 < 20.05, 4 = 9.488, thus, we fail to reject H0 and the machines
breakdown and shift are independent (not related).
6.
H0 : 1 = 2 = 3 = 4
H1 : i 6= j for at least one (i, j)
SSE2193
Source of
variation
Hardwood
concentration
Error
Total
Sum of
Squares
Degrees
of freedom
Mean Squares
Fcalc
362.79
130.17
492.96
3
20
23
120.93
6.51
18.576
8.
(a)
H0
H1
SSE2193
151
153
148 143
152
146
154
145
155
144
142
147
or
or
or
or
Reject H0 if P (Y 6 y) 6
The computed
P -value is P (X > 10) = 1 P (X 6 9) = 1 0.9807 = 0.0193 < 0.05
or
P (Y 6 2) = 0.0193 < 0.05
Reject H0 and conclude that product B is favored over product A.
SSE2193
(c) H0 : X = Y vs. H1 : X 6= Y
= 0.1
Brand
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Time
26.3
28.1
25.9
27.7
26.3
25.8
28.5
27.7
23.2
25.8
24.1
23.5
Ranks
7.5
11
6
9.5
7.5
4.5
12
9.5
1
4.5
3
2
n = 5, m = 7
T1 = 9.5 + 1 + 4.5 + 3 + 2 = 20
T2 = 7.5 + 11 + 6. + 9.5 + 7.5 + 4.5 + 12 = 58
Reject H0 when T1 < 22 or T1 > 5(12 + 1) 22 = 43
Since T1 = 20 < 22, we reject H0 at = 0.1. We can conclude that the
ups of brand X is not identical with that of brand Y .