Spirality of cotton plain knitted fabrics with respect to variation in yarn and machine parameters. Relaxation process through washing and tumble drying causes spirality of wale lines to develop.
Spirality of cotton plain knitted fabrics with respect to variation in yarn and machine parameters. Relaxation process through washing and tumble drying causes spirality of wale lines to develop.
Spirality of cotton plain knitted fabrics with respect to variation in yarn and machine parameters. Relaxation process through washing and tumble drying causes spirality of wale lines to develop.
Spirality of cotton plain knitted fabrics with respect to variation in yarn and machine parameters V K Kothari Department of Textile Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi 110 016, India and G Singh, K Roy a & R Varshney Textile Engineering Department, Giani Zail Singh College of Engineering & Technology, Bathinda 151 001, India Received 1 October 2010; accepted 18 January 2011 A study on the effects of various yarn and machine parameters on spirality of cotton tubular plain fabrics has been conducted and the results are statistically analyzed. The observations are taken both in finished as well as in reference states. The study reveals that relaxation process through washing and tumble drying causes the spirality of wale lines to develop. The extent of spirality is decided by the ease of freedom with which the unbalanced torque due to yarn twist gets relaxed. Tightness of fabric which is decided by yarn count and stitch length in addition to machine gauge controls the distortion of loops, resulting in increasing the spirality with the enlargement of stitch length, lowering the machine gauge and/or raising the yarn fineness. Keywords: Cotton, Machine gauge, Reference state, Spirality, Stitch length, Tightness factor, Twist liveliness, Yarn linear density
1 Introduction In single jersey knitted fabrics, non-perpendicular disposition of wales with respect to the courses creates a problem of spirality. Several researchers 1,2
have investigated the phenomenon of wale spirality and found that the main cause for this spirality effect is the residual torque in the yarn shown by its twist liveliness as well as unbalanced torque in the yarn loop owing to bending of yarn in a loop. Tightness of the knitting construction, fabric relaxation and finishing processes also have considerable influence on the extent of spirality 3 . In circular weft knitted fabrics, apart from skewness of wales from the vertical, another similar course-wise distortion i.e. drop effect appears as a result of helical orientation of the courses that depends on the number of used feeders 4 . It has been suggested that the total spirality in the fabric is contributed by both spirality and drop effect 1,4 . Spirality can cause serious problems when the fabrics are made up into garments like displacement of shifting of seams, mismatched patterns, sewing difficulties, etc. Various experimental studies 4-8 have explored the different contributory factors on spirality. Some are machine related like use of multiple feeders and gauge, whereas some are associated with constituent yarns like twist liveliness and linear density. Essentially in almost all citations, it has been clearly demonstrated that it is the relaxation of torsional stresses which causes the dimensional distortions and instability in the knitted loop construction. This leads to the appearance of spirality in the fabrics. The distortion of loops progresses till a fully relaxed state is reached by subjecting the fabric to repeated washing, rinsing and tumble drying. This state has been referred to as Reference state by Heap et al. 9 . Thus, the literature makes us realize that the problem of spirality can be taken care of and kept under control to design a fabric by selecting proper combination of various machine, yarn and finishing parameters. Undoubtedly, some significant research work has been carried out in exploring the various factors influencing and suppressing the spirality. However, in most of the studies 1-3,5,8,11 conducted so far, the fabrics were manufactured in laboratory model single feeder circular knitting machines, whereas multi-feeder machines are employed in commercial production. On the same move, study of de Araujo and Smith 4 has revealed that the number of feeders in machine has significant bearing on spirality of knitted fabrics. In the light of above facts an ________________ a To whom all the correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kalyankalyan1@yahoo.co.in INDIAN J. FIBRE TEXT. RES., SEPTEMBER 2011
228 elaborate data base is needed which can be of immense help in understanding and analyzing the problem and consequently in developing a model having satisfactory predictability. The present study is therefore undertaken to examine the angle of spirality in the finished single jersey cotton knitted fabrics, manufactured on a multi- feeder machine, made with different yarn linear densities and twist levels under varying fabric tightness factor obtained by introducing changes in stitch length and machine gauge and subjecting them to the reference state. A relationship among the variables is explored for the generation of spirality which can help us designing a fabric with spirality at a sufficiently low level.
2 Materials and Methods 2.1 Materials and Sample Preparation Nine types of combed cotton yarns were procured with three tex (count) values, each with three levels of twist factors, and then tested for their major properties. The results are furnished in Table 1. The above yarns were knitted on a single jersey circular knitting machine having 61 cm diameter, equipped with 48 positive feed devices and adjustable fabric pulley take-down system. During preparation of fabric samples, care was taken to keep the yarn tension constant at 12 cN for all 48 feeders. Cylinders of 16, 20 and 24 gauge (needles per inch) were used for all the 9 samples of yarns and, for each cylinder, the nominal stitch lengths selected were 0.30, 0.32 and 0.34 cm by changing the cam settings and positive feed device in the machine. The dyeing was carried out in industry under normal industrial parameters and all fabric samples were processed in the same bath, for which the fabric samples were stitched together end to end. Subsequently, the fabrics were given compaction treatment and each fabric sample was separately set in the compaction machine to achieve the nominal finishing targets. The route of wet processing sequence is shown below:
The procedure detailed by Heap et al. 9 was adopted for full relaxation treatment using a fully automatic front loading domestic washing machine and a tumbler dryer. All the fabric samples were taken for this treatment which consisted of (i) a standard wash at 60C using surf excel matic detergent, rinse and spin, followed by standard tumble drying for 30 min at 60 C until dry; and (ii) four cycles of rinsing and tumble drying, making five cycles in all.
2.2 Sample Testing Procedures and Data Analysis Relevant parameters, such as loop length, courses per cm, wales per cm and angle of spirality, for all the Table 1 Constructional parameters and other specifications of the yarns used
KOTHARI et al.: SPIRALITY OF COTTON PLAIN KNITTED FABRICS
229 reference state specimens were recorded after conditioning these samples for 72 h in a standard atmosphere of 27 2 C and 65 2% RH. For the measurement of liveliness of yarns, subjective assessment was adopted. Since there is no standard method available for the measurement of twist liveliness, authors adopted the method followed by Araujo and Smith 4 . Tightness factor was calculated using the observed values of stitch length and yarn linear density from the Eq. (1), as shown below:
Tightness factor , 1/2 -1 tex cm = (yarn linear density)/stitch length (1)
The spirality was measured following the test procedure as described in British standards BS 1819:1990 which has been adopted by Tao et al. 10 . The physical appearance of spirality in the fabric is shown in the microscopic photograph [Fig.1 (a)]. The test method is illustrated in Fig.1 (b). The magnitude of spirality is obtained by using the following equation:
Angle of spirality () = tan -1 (d/L) (2)
where d is the displacement of the course from a normal line to the wale of the fabric measured at a distance L from the identified wale line. A response surface methodology based on step regression with backward elimination was adopted using SYSTAT 12
statistical software. Here
significant terms were retained in the response surface equation by eliminating insignificant terms step-wise, the level of significance selected was 5%. 3 Results and Discussion 3.1 Contribution of Yarn and Machine Setting Parameters to Spirality The average spirality in the dyed and finished fabrics (compacted) is found to be negligibly small. Here the spirality is corrected in finishing by imposing distortion in the fabric so that the wales are straightened out. As soon as the fabric gets relaxed during repeated washings and tumble drying, the skewness of the wales reoccurs. The average spirality angles obtained in the different knitting conditions under reference state are summarized in Table 2. Multiple linear regression equation derived from the data (based on coded values of independent variables) has been presented in Eq. (3), which shows the relationships of various controlling factors with the response variable i.e. angle of spirality. The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) calculated is 0.97, indicating that the factors considered in this study are sufficient enough to account for almost all variations occurring in the spirality of the fabrics. The regression equation used is given below:
where SL is the stitch length; tex, the yarn linear density; G, the knitting machine gauge expressed in number of needles per inch; and TTF, the yarn tex twist factor. Results of ANOVA carried out with the experimental response establishing the relative significance of independent controllable variables (in terms of F-values) are presented in Table 3. Yarn linear density has been found to be the most
Fig. 1 Spirality in single jersey fabrics (a) physical appearance of spirality in wale line (b) technique of measuring fabric spirality INDIAN J. FIBRE TEXT. RES., SEPTEMBER 2011
230 significant variable explaining around 61% of variations in angle of spirality, followed by level of twist (tex and TTF jointly accounts for 76% variations), stitch length and machine gauge respectively. Around 95% of variations in the data are accounted for by these four variables together. Various significant interaction terms have also been identified from the empirical model and their behavior is represented in the graphical forms (Fig. 2). Figure 2(a) shows that the spirality increases both with increase in yarn twist level and stitch length but the increase in angle of spirality with stitch length is steeper at higher twist factor. This implies that fabrics are prone to higher spirality if made up of yarns with higher twists. On the other side, spirality is more sensitive to twist and loops are more conducive for distortion under relation process, if the fabrics are constituted of stitches with relatively bigger loop lengths. Similarly, Fig. 2(b) shows an increase in spirality with the increase in stitch length, whereas the trend is opposite with respect to yarn linear density. As the yarn becomes coarser, drop in spirality occurs. It is also noteworthy that gradient of spirality vs stitch length tends to be higher towards lower yarn linear density. Figure 2(c) shows the trend of spirality in response to yarn linear density and tex twist factor and their interaction. Increment in angle of spirality per unit increase in yarn twist gets larger when the linear density of yarns is reduced. With regard to influence of machine gauge, it is clearly indicated by Eq. (3) that the spirality decreases linearly with machine gauge.
3.2 Spirality of Fabric in Relation to its Structural Changes It is a well-known fact that knitted loops in single jersey fabrics have dimensional instability which leads to its distortions. Loop distortions, in principle, are governed by its deformability and the availability of freedom in structure, which allows the loops to get deformed. Undoubtedly, deformability, as shown by previous research work 3,4 , is linked with relaxation of torsional stresses in the yarn (known as twist liveliness) which are developed by twisting process, whereas tightness factor has been identified as a measure of the freedom of loop movement in the knitted fabric construction. Now it is to be explored, in what way and proportion the yarn and machine parameters have a bearing on the above two features related to structural mechanics which ultimately decides the spirality level. The twist liveliness is represented by the twisting couple applied to the yarn causing the yarn to snarl. The increase in snarling tendency (twist liveliness) of yarn with twist level (Table 1) is quite obvious and accordingly reflected in spirality values. During relaxation treatment, these residual yarn torques are relieved and loop distortion takes place. But opposite to the trend of liveliness, spirality behavior in the Table 2 Constructional details of fabrics and their spirality test results in reference (repeated washed/tumble-dried) states
Yarn linear density, tex Twist factor tex 1/2 tpc Angle of spirality, deg 16 a 20 a 24 a
Parameter F - ratio P-value Constant Yarn linear density (tex) 1534.21 <0.001 Tex twist factor (TTF) 421.44 <0.001 Stitch length (SL) 327.53 <0.001 Machine gauge (G) 127.96 <0.001 TTF*tex 44.003 <0.001 SL*tex 9.954 0.003 SL*TTF 7.127 0.010 KOTHARI et al.: SPIRALITY OF COTTON PLAIN KNITTED FABRICS
231 fabrics declines with yarn linear density. The yarn mobility in the form of stitch distortion is hindered by the tightness in the fabric structure. The measurements carried out for values of stitch length and calculations made for corresponding tightness factors are shown in Table 4. Increasing tightness factor corresponding to increasing yarn linear density as well as downsizing the stitch length can be witnessed. Obviously, fabric is comparatively tighter than the one knitted with lower yarn linear density (finer yarn) and/or higher stitch length. As the fabric tightness reduces, fabrics become more and more slack and consequently the yarn composing the loop has a higher tendency to rotate inside the fabric after relaxation, depending on the amount of twist present. It is to be pointed out that the observations do not indicate towards any specific relationship of yarn twist level with stitch length, and consequently the fabric tightness factor resulting after finishing or relaxation processes. At the same time, no correlation of gauge with stitch length and successively with the tightness factor has emerged. Hence, the influence of machine gauge on spirality cannot be accounted for in terms of tightness of the fabrics. The considerable increase in spirality with machine gauge after relaxation treatment may be attributed to somewhat increase in twist liveliness of the yarns in which the twist is only temporary set. There is every likelihood that the loops in the fabrics (but of similar stitch length) made on coarse gauge machine experience the continuous adjustments starting with robbing back effect as occurred on knitting machine, through various wet processing and eventually during washing and tumble drying process. The unsymmetrical stresses on the loops during knitting process and wet processing are expected to be released under fully relaxed state, which give rise to generation of spirality of higher magnitude. On the basis of above observations and their analysis, it can be inferred that while considering the extent of spirality in fully relaxed fabrics, yarn twist should not be considered as the sole parameter. Rather level of yarn twists in combination with tightness of fabric presents the true picture. Washing and tumble drying result in fabric relaxation and lead to increased fabric spirality considerably as an outcome of yarn twist liveliness, as also observed by other workers 3 . Tightness of fabric structure interferes with this process of relaxation and consequently, the loop distortion caused by above-said twist is dependent on restrictive influence of fabric construction. Therefore, the spirality response can only be characterized by the interplay of both the factors, i.e. yarn twist and construction tightness of fabrics.
Fig. 2 Variation of spirality in fabrics with respect to (a) yarn twist and stitch length (b) yarn linear density and stitch length, and (c) yarn linear density and yarn twist (coded values) INDIAN J. FIBRE TEXT. RES., SEPTEMBER 2011
232 This fact can be clearly demonstrated with the help of statistical predictive model as given in the following equation which is based on measured values of concerned controlling parameters taken at appropriate level of fabric treatment, i.e. at the finished state:
Tightness of fabric construction can best be represented by tightness factor (TF) which incorporates yarn linear density and loop length as tex/SL. The response surface equation showing the dependence of angle of spirality on tex twist factor and tightness factor is presented in Fig.3. A significant interaction between twist factor and tightness factor is clearly visible demonstrating that at higher values of tightness factor the slope of increase in spirality with respect to twist factor is reduced substantially. This might be due to jamming of wales and with the loops constrained in both the directions, which makes the loop movement more restrictive. Hence, low level of spirality is experienced. In the similar manner, it can also be drawn that as the yarn twist factor increases, the drop in spirality as a function of tightness factor becomes sharp, although the spirality at higher twist factor always remains higher at all the levels of tightness factors. At sufficiently high tightness, effect of twist gets unrecognizable. The surface response curve and associated ANOVA analysis demonstrates that during the process of full relaxation, it is the tightness of fabric which contributes substantially in affixing the spirality, even surpassing the twist level present in the yarn. After this exhaustive elaboration about the role of various influencing variables, it is quite appropriate to make a general predictive model which can help in estimating the fabric spirality based on actual finished fabric parameters. Equation (5), as given below, presents such a derived model based on the experimental observations:
Additionally, it is observed that the predictive models Eqs (4) and (5) have been obtained with Table 4 Average fabric structural parameters (measured) as a result of variation in yarn and machine setting after dyeing and finishing treatments Measured stitch length, cm Measured tightness factor, tex 1/2 cm -1
Yarn linear density Twist factor tex 1/2 tpc 16 a 20 a 24 a 16 a 20 a 24 a
Fig. 3 Variation of spirality in fabrics with respect to fabric tightness factor and yarn twist level KOTHARI et al.: SPIRALITY OF COTTON PLAIN KNITTED FABRICS
233 sufficiently high accuracy in estimating spirality as a function of tex, stitch length, twist and gauge giving the R 2 values as 0.95 and 0.97 respectively.
3.3 Validation of Predictive Models In order to validate the predictive Eq.(5), authors replicated a part of the total experiment by randomly selecting all nine types of yarns from the parent stock and knitted 12 single jersey samples with various stitch lengths and gauges. The fabrics were scoured, dyed and finished to nominal width following the same route of chemical processing as adopted in the main study. The fabric parameters of the replicated samples and the error% from their model values are furnished in Table 5. It is observed that the highest and the lowest error% are 3.05 and (-)2.71. The overall error percentage is low enough to make us believe that the prediction of spirality in the fabrics and its variation can be done quite satisfactorily in response to change in various controlling parameters i.e. yarn count, yarn twist, stitch length and machine gauge. Similarly, for the model represented by Eq.(4), the highest and lowest error% are found to be 6.19 and 0.69 respectively.
4 Conclusion 4.1 Repeated washings and tumble drying cause an increase in the spirality, depending on the level of twist present in the constituent yarns as well as the amount of tightness present in the fabric structure. 4.2 Lower loop length, higher machine gauge and coarser count reduce the spirality, as tightness of fabric construction imposes restrictions on the loops to get distorted. 4.3 Increasing twist factor increases twist liveliness in yarn leading to large spirality angle. This effect is further facilitated in the fabrics with larger stitch length and/or with finer yarn and/or knitted on a machine with coarser gauge. 4.4 An empirical model has been developed to estimate the spirality of cotton plain knitted fabrics with sufficient accuracy.
Acknowledgement The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from SERC Division, Department of Science & Technology, Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of India, for this study.
References 1 Primentas A, Indian J Fibre Text Res, 28 (2003) 55. 2 Celik O, Ucar N & Erlugruls S, Fibres Text Eastern Eur, 13 (3) (2005) 51. 3 Buhler G & Haussler W, Knit Technol, 7(6) (1985) 373 and 8 (1986) 41. 4 De Araujo M D & Smith G W, Text Res J, 59 (1989) 247. 5 Davis W & Edwards C H, J Text Inst, 25 (1934) T122. 6 Lord P R, Mohamed M H & Ajgaonkar D B, Text Res J, 44 (1974) 405. 7 Oinuma R & Takeda H, J Text Mech Soc Japan (Eng edn), 34 (3) (1988) 74. 8 Banerjee P K & Alaiban T S, Text Res J, 58 (1988) 287. 9 Heap S A, Greenwood P F, Leah R D, Eaton J T, Stevens J C & Keher P, Text Res J, 53(1983) 109. 10 Tao J, Dhingra R C, Chan C K & Abbas M S, Text Res J, 67(1) (1997) 57.
Table 5 Validation of the empirical models Fabric Specifications
Stitch length measured, cm Spirality angle calculated from Eq. (5) Spirality angle calculated from Eq. (4) Measured angle of spirality, deg Error 1 % Error 2 %