Casella's Song (Purg.

II, 112) Author(s): John Freccero Reviewed work(s): Source: Dante Studies, with the Annual Report of the Dante Society, No. 91 (1973), pp. 73-80 Published by: Dante Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40166155 . Accessed: 03/05/2012 22:21
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Dante Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Dante Studies, with the Annual Report of the Dante Society.

http://www.jstor.org

Casella's

Song

{Purg. ii, 112)

JOHN FRECCERO

Dante quotes his earlier poetry in the Commedia,we are meant to perceive a distance, perhaps even an ironic distance, between a former poetic self and the poem that we read. The same can probably be said of any writer who refers to his former work within a confessional structure, but it is especially true of Dante, whose whole poetic career was a continual askesis in preparation for his last work. In such a linear evolution, a glance backward to a previous poetic achievement is more likely to be a sign of transcendence rather than of return, of self-critique rather than self-satisfaction.1 Like the spiritual evolution of his protagonist, Dante's poetic history derives its significance retrospectively from its ending. The Commedia provides a new framework within which the total poetic experience of its creator is ordered toward an ending that could not have been foreseen at any single moment of the evolution, while appearing to be its inevitable outcome. An allusion to a former work within such a context is inevitably palinodic, for it invests the poetry itself with the dramatic double-focus that is part of the story: the conversion of the Dante who was into the poet whose work we read. The clearest example of such a palinodic moment is also the earliest instance in the poem of a recall to Dante's previous poetry. There is scarcely any need to point out that Francesca's description of love, "Amor, ch'al cor gentil ratto s'apprende" (Inf. v, 100), no longer reflects the author's view of the matter, in spite of the fact that her words echo those of Dante's youth and of Guido Guinizelli before him. The rejection of Francesca's theory of love is implicit in her damnation; if her words echo Dante's own, she is their refutation. Like Flaubert's heroine,

73

Dante Studies, xci, 1973

Emma Bovary, she stands as a surrogate for her creator, both the sign and the vehicle of his transcendence. An analogous moment occurs in the second canto of the Purgatorio when Casella sings the second canzone of the Convivio, "Amor che ne la mente mi ragiona," to the delight of the new company of souls. Once more the subject is love and the vehicle is Dante's former work. Here too, the dramatic situation implies a critique: Cato's scolding is severe enough to embarrass Virgil as well as the pilgrim. Finally, the canto closes with a simile comparing the souls to doves, as in Infernov: Come quando, cogliendo biado o loglio, li colombi adunatia la pastura queti, sanzamostrarfusato orgoglio, se cosa appareond'elli abbianpaura, subitamentelascianostar l'esca perch' assalitison da maggior cura... (Purg.n, 124-129) In spite of these resemblances, however, there seems to be no consensus among the critics as to whether the episode of the Purgatoriocarries the same palinodic force that seems to be borne by Francesca's words. The purpose of this paper is to suggest that this is indeed the case and that the episode constitutes a partial correction of an important thesis of the Convivio. The principal difficulty is that Casella is made to choose a relatively abstruse, doctrinal and therefore inappropriate canzone for his song. The anonimojiorentino defines the difficulty succinctly: "per le canzoni morali, come fu questa, non suole essere usanza d'intonarle."2 The critical assumption has always been that Casella's song is a recreational interlude, which would seem to call for a less weighty theme: either this song is not the very famous canzoneof the same name (as the anonimo goes on to argue), or Casella's canzone is somehow not intended to have the philosophical meaning that the original indisputably bears. I should like to argue that, on the contrary, this is the very same poem and we are meant to understand its full philosophical force. The "Amore" celebrated here marks an advance over the "Amore" of Francesca's verses in the same measure that the Convivio marked an advance over the Vita Nuova. Casella's song is not simply light relief, but is rather a signal for the poem's entrance into a new area of concern. First of all, there is no way that the canzone of the Convivio can be interpreted as a simple love song of the type that we would suppose Casella to have sung, even if he were the innovative composer that some historians have imagined him to have been.3 The lady of "Amor

74

Casella's Song, Purg. n, 112, john freccero

che ne la mente mi ragiona" is clearly Lady Philosophy and not a mortal woman, not even at the literal level, as even a cursory reading of the canzone will demonstrate. Some of its philosophical detail might conceivably be read as erotic hyperbole, but it would be difficult on those grounds to explain away verses such as "Ogni Intelletto di la su la mira" (v. 23), or "Costei penso Chi mosse l'universo" (v. 72), alluding to the biblical Wisdom (Proverbs 8: 27). Because of the poet's uncertainty about his lady in the first canzone of the Convivio, there may be some slight grounds for arguing that that poem be read as a secular love poem which was interpreted allegorically as an afterthought; in "Amor che ne la mente mi ragiona," however, the poet seems completely caught up in his new found love for philosophy. We scarcely need his commentary to recognize in his beloved the same Lady that appeared to Boethius in The Consolationof Philosophy. Dante was explicit about the importance of the Consolation for an understanding of the Convivio. So linked are the two works that Dante's citation of his own brings with it several allusions to that of Boethius even here in the Purgatorio,thus making it clear that the verse of the canzone is to be read in its original context: . . ."Se nuova legge non ti toglie memoria o uso a Tamorosocanto che mi solea quetartutte mie voglie, di cio ti piacciaconsolare alquanto Vanimamia... (Purg.n, 106-10) Given the subject-matter and the provenance of the song, the use of the word "consolare" seems particularly meaningful, for it recalls the function of the Donna Gentile in the Convivio and of Lady Philosophy in Boethius' Consolation. It seems reasonable to assume that Casella offers the same kind of consolation by celebrating the Love of Wisdom, Philosophia, rather than passionate love. If we have trouble thinking of this as an "amoroso canto," it is because the meaning of the word word "amore" has narrowed since Dante's time.4 We shall see that the definition of this love, transcending the erotic and falling short of the divine, is part of the significance of this episode. It may be objected that the comfort offered by Casella is in his music rather than in his words. Apart from the problem of explaining why Dante would have chosen these words to be ignored, this objection would make of the episode a distraction rather than a consolation. Instead, it must be interpreted in its context, a context in which the

75

Dante Studies, xci, 1973

comfort of philosophy is accompanied by song, rather than the reverse. Such was the case with Boethius: It is time, then, for you to take a little mild and pleasantnourishment which by being absorbedinto your body will preparethe way for somethingstronger. Let us bring to bear the persuasivepowers of sweet-tongued Rhetoric and... let us have as well Music, the maid-servantof my house, to sing us melodies of varying mood.8 In Casella's song, our attention must be fixed on the words, for we have nothing else. The unheard melody is a fiction and must be understood as part of a literary tradition in which the consolation of philosophy is set to music as a sign of its all-absorbing power.8 Dante's choice of an historical person to provide the accompaniment, rather than an allegorical abstraction such as Lady Philosophy, serves to reinforce at the stylistic level what is, after all, the significance of Cato's reproof: we are a long way, both in style and in substance, from the philosophical allegories of the Consolationand the Convivio. In a single episode, Dante's figural realism transcends both Philosophy and the allegories that celebrated it, including his own. A recurrent figure in Boethius' text (as in our language) is of philosophy as "food" for thought, the same figure from which the Convivio derives its title as well as its central theme. In the Purgatorio,the rapt attention of the souls to Casella's song is compared to the total absorption of birds feeding on wheat or tares. The simile might be explained by the association of the flight of birds with the ascent of the soul, in Plato as well as in Dante, or with a retrospective glance at the canto of Francesca, where the subject was also "amore." With such literary resonances, the feeding of birds might be considered a fitting emblem for the momentary satisfaction of desire that the souls in fact experience here, feeding on the esca of Casella's song. These speculations would remain only that, were it not for the fact that the simile was probably drawn from the second meter of Book m of the Consolation. The subject there is the natural desire for happiness; its treatment is very like Dante's in the first canto of the Paradiso, but one of the examples of innate desire is reminiscent of our passage. Caged birds will scorn the sweet food set forth for them by their captors and will yearn instead for their home : Si tamen arto salienstexto Nemorum gratasviderit umbras,

escas, Sparsas pedibus proterit

Silvas tantum maestarequirit ...7

The resemblance of this simile to Dante's is evident in such a context.

76

Casellas Song, Purg. n, 112, john freccero

If Dante is in fact alluding to it, then it is not without a certain irony, for Boethius' point is that Philosophy is the means that man must use to satisfy his natural desire for happiness, a thesis not unlike that of the opening lines of the Convivio. In the Purgatorio,however, the goal is happiness, for which Philosophy is definitely not sufficient. supernatural as Boethius' Philosophia had cast out the Muses of secular poetry,8 Just she in turn is "cast out" in Dante's text by Cato's rebuke. With die simile of the birds feeding, Boethius' figure is used against his own thesis. These birds are doves, symbols of human desire, as they were in the canto of Paolo and Francesca: Quali colombe, dal disio chiamate, con Tali alzate e ferme al dolce nido vegnon per l'aere dal voler portate ... (Inf. v, 82-84) Among the many texts that might be cited as background for this simile, one seems to deserve special attention. I refer to the verse of Psalm 54, with its poignant cry for the wings of the dove and for rest: Quis dabit mihi pennassicut colombae et volabo et requiescam? (Psalm 54: 6) Because wings are specifically mentioned in this text, as well as the yearning for peace reminiscent of Francesca, it would seem to be at least as apt as the Virgilian passages usually adduced by commentators in their glosses to Infernov.9 It would also seem fitting as background for the simile of Purgatorion, where the doves seem, momentarily at least, to have found a certain peace: "colombi . . . queti." For all of their anecdotal charm, the two similes represent coherent statements regarding Dante's theory of human desire. For Francesca, peace means the end of a desire that is in human terms insatiable. Even the virtuous pagans, Virgil tells us, can never hope for that final quies: "sanza speme vivemo in disio" (Inf iv, 42). The "bufera infernale" to which Paolo and Francesca are condemned represents the restlessness of what St. Augustine called "the unquiet heart,"10 at once the sin and its punishment. The simile of the doves in Canto v represents the insatiability of human desire quite accurately, by placing the will and the apparent object of its desire at opposite poles. The pilgrim calls the souls in the name of the "amore" which impels them (v. 78) and they respond: "dal disio chiamate ... dal voler portate." The flight of the doves, then, is literally "amore," the attempt to bridge the gap between

77

Dante Studies, xci, 1973

the will (velle) and its object (disio). Francesca'sfate is evidence enough that concupiscence cannot bring the fulfillment of desire, while Virgil's fate is evidence that the higher love of Reason is equally powerless, through no fault of its own, however. Virgil's embarrassed reaction to Cato's reproof is a belated recognition of an order of reality undreamt of in Antiquity. The problem is, quite simply, that although the desire for God is innate and natural in man, the satisfaction of that desire is supernatural. Only in the Beatific Vision is Christian happiness possible, when the will and its object are one in eternal fruition: "il mio disio e il velle" (Par. xxxra, 143).11 The human heart is unquiet, "until it rest in Thee." In such a dynamism, which is at once the poem and its story, the sudden flight of doves which were temporarily "queti" cannot fail to signify the momentary peace to be found in this life through philosophical study ("quetar tutte mie voglie," v. 108) and the subsequent realization of a further, transcendent goal. In his scolding, Cato defines that goal in terms of vision: Correte al monte a spogliarvilo scoglio ch'essernon lasciaa voi Dio manifesto. (Purg.n, 122-123) The poignancy of man's fate in the natural order resides in the fact that he cannot know his own goal.12 When the souls hurry up the mountainside, they go "com'om che va, ne sa dove riesca" (v. 132), an unmistakeable indication that they go toward an objective that transcends human reason and therefore the limits of philosophy. The "nuova legge" (v. 106) to which Casella's song is subject is the New Law, the supernatural order to which nature must ultimately give way. It requires that a new song be sung unto the Lord, the song with which the canto opens: In Exitu Israel de Aegypto. The first lines of the Convivio set forth the Aristotelian doctrine of the natural desire to know and of knowledge as man's ultima felidtade: Si come dice lo Filosofo nel principio de la Prima Filosofia, tutti li uomini naturalmentedesideranodi sapere. La ragione di che puote essere ed e che ciascunacosa, da providenza di propria naturaimpinta, e inclinable a la sua propriaperfezione; onde, accio che la scienzae ultima perfezione de la nostra anima, ne la quale sta la nostra ultima felicitade, tutti naturalmenteal suo desideriosemo subietti. This view, which places man's desire to know in a providential context, is readily assimilable to the doctrine of Book m of the Consolationand especially to the second meter mentioned above, although Boethius

78

Caselh's Song, Purg. n, 112, john freccero

seems to be using a more Platonic vocabulary. Both of these views are assimilable to Christian ideas of beatitude as long as the qualifying phrase, "in this life," be understood to apply to the philosophical definitions. Here in the Purgatorio,however, we have gone beyond the limits of "this life," whether the phrase be understood literally or tropologically: Virgil is a pilgrim here, as is everyone else (v. 63), and Ulysses' attempt to reach a philosophical truth without supernaturalguidance is a faint memory (Purg. i, 132). In such a setting, the otium traditionally required for philosophy is negligenza (v. 121) and philosophical pride (cf. "usato orgoglio," v. 126) must give way to Christian humility. A last word should be said to conclude this essay about the relevance of what I have called the "dynamism of desire" for poetry. In the similes we have examined, the images of doves have been associated with poetry, as well as desire. The association of language and desire is at least as old as the Phaedrusand is documented in Dante's poem by the story of Francesca. The transfer of the virtual image of desire from the written text to the human heart and back again is part of the history of all erotic literature, but especially of Dante's writing, where Love's progress is identical with the movement of poetry toward the silence of the ending. The doves in the story of Francesca contribute to the literary dimension of the episode's significance, for in their flight they suggest the imagery with which Guido Guinizelli's canzone began: "Al cor gentil reimpara sempre amore / come l'ausello in selva a la verdura." In a sense, then, the imagery of the dolce stil novo is used to undercut its theory of love, just as Boethius' bird simile is used against him in the Purgatorio. Throughout the poem, the association of poetry with desire is signalled by such imagery: in the canto of Guido Guinzelli most notably, where the subject is also poetry and love, and in the canto of Bonagiunta,13 where Dante gives his definition of the dolcestil novo: Io veggio ben come le vostre penne di retro al dittator sen vanno strette, che de le nostre certo non awenne; Come li augei che vernan lungo '1 Nilo... (Purg.xxiv, 58-64) The imagery possibly derives from a toposused by Guinizelli14 in his own poetry comparing the variety of poets to various birds. In this passage, however, the proximity of the word "penne" to the simile of birds in flight and the suggestion of motion in pursuit of the dittatore,Love, invite us to reflect on the sense in which Eros and poetry are inseparable

79

Dante Studies, xci, 1973

on a journey that strains both to their limit: "ma non eran da cio le proprie penne" (Par. xxxm, 139). Casella's song was a respite, as was the Convivio; both had to be interrupted for the long journey that lay ahead. Yale University New Haven, Connecticut

NOTES
1. For the question of the poet as pilgrim, see Gianfranco Contini, "Dante come in Approdo,N. S., iv, No. 1 (1958), 19-46. personaggio-poeta della Commedia,** 2. Quoted by Natalino Sapegno (ed.), Dante, La Divina Commedia a cura di N. S. (La Letteratura italiana: Storia e testi, Vol. iv; Milano: Ricciardi Editore, 1957), p. 415. 3. For the myth of Casella as inventor of the madrigal, see Leonard Ellenwood, "Origins of the Italian Ars Nova" Papers Read by Members of the American MusicologicalSociety, Pittsburgh, Dec. 29-30, 1937 (privately printed), p. 30-31. Ellenwood discusses the "timeworn" reference to the phrase, "e Casella dicde il suono," supposedly attached to a "madrigal" of Lemmo da Pistoia. 4. For the phrase, "amoroso canto," see Sapegno, p. 414, who correctly observes "non si tratta di amore per donne, ma dell'elogio in forma allegorica della Filosofia." For the theme and genre of "Consolation," see Dictionnaire de Spiritualityascitique et mystique, ed. G. Viller (Paris: Beauschesne, 1953), sub voce. 5. Boethius, The Consolation of Philosophy, trans. V.E. Watts (Hammondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1969), p. 54. 6. For the iconography of Boethius and Music, see Pierre Courcelle, "La Consolationde de Bohe (Paris: Etudes AugustiniHttSraire: Antic6dentsetpostfrite* dansla tradition philosophic*9 ennes, 1967), p. 92-93 and especially the iconographical appendix. 7. Boethius, The Consolation of Philosophy, ed. H. F. Stewart, Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; London: Heinemann, 1953), p. 234. 8. Ibid., p. 132. 9. See Sapegno, ad loc. 10. ConfessionsI, 1. See C. S. Singleton's remarks in An Essay on the Vita Nuova (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1958, cl949), p. 61. 11. The parallelism between "disio . . . volere" in Inferno v and "disio . . . velle" in Paradisoxxxm was first pointed out to me by Professor Singleton. See my article "The Final Image," in MLN, lxxx (1964), p. 58 ff. 12. William R. O'Connor, The Eternal Quest: The Teaching of St. Thomas Aquinas on the Natural Desirefor God (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1947), p. 147 ff. 13. For Bonagiunta, see Maria Simonelh. "Bonagiunta Orbicciani e la problematica dello stil nuovo (Purg. xxrv)," in Dante Studies, lxxxvi (1968), 65-83. 14. "Omo ch'e saggio non corre leggero, Sonnet XlXb, Poett del Duecento, a cura di G. Contini (Milano: Ricciardi Editore, 1960), Vol. n, p. 482.

80