Professional Documents
Culture Documents
revised 15.09.2008
Introduction
Hardening Soil (HS) and Hardening Soil-small (HS-small) models are designed to reproduce basic phenomena exhibited by soils:
densication stiness stress dependency plastic yielding dilatancy strong stiness variation with growing shear strain amplitude in the regime of small strains ( = 106 to = 103 ) this phenomenon plays a crucial role for modeling deep excavations and soil-structure interaction problems
Introduction
HS model was initially formulated by Schanz, Vermeer and Bonnier (1998, 1999) and then enhanced by Benz (2006) Current implementation is slightly modied with respect to the theory given by Benz:
simplied treatment of dilatancy for the small strain version (HS-small) modied hardening law for preconsolidation pressure
This model seems to be one of the simplest in the class of models designed to handle small strain stiness It consists of the two plastic mechanisms, shear and volumetric Small strain stiness is incorporated by means of nonlinear elasticity which includes hysteretic eects
Eo
200 150 100 50 0 0 0.05 0.1
qun
q [kpa]
1 1 q50
0.25
Remark: All classical soil models require specication of Eur modulus (Cam-Clay, Cap etc..)
Andrzej Truty ZACE Services Hardening Soil model with small strain stiness
Atkinson 1991
Andrzej Truty ZACE Services Hardening Soil model with small strain stiness
0.7
07
Ed Es
10
co h es i ve so i ls
Ro ck
gran
u l ar
soil
1 1000
Es [kPa]
10000 100000 1000000
Cap surface
qf 200
q [kPa] 150 100 50
M-C limit
E50 1
qf 1
0.01 0.02
Eur
0 0
0.03 eps-1
0.04
0.05
+ c cot 3
Remarks
1
To extend standard HS model to the range of small strain Benz introduced few modications:
1
Strain dependency is added to the stress-strain relation, for stress paths penetrating the elastic domain The modied Hardin-Drnevich relationship is used to relate current secant shear modulus G and equivalent monotonic shear strain hist Reversal points are detected with aid of deviatoric strain history second order tensor Hij ; in addition the current equivalent shear strain hist is computed by using this tensor
plot from paper by Ishihara 1986 At step N : histN 1 = 8 105 histN = 104 At step N + 1 : histN = 0 histN +1 = 2 105 max Primary loading: histN +1 > hist max Unloading/reloading: histN +1 hist Go Hardin-Drnevich law: G = hist (secant modulus) 1+a 0 .7
Andrzej Truty ZACE Services Hardening Soil model with small strain stiness
Gur
c
c = 0.7 a Go 1 Gur
Cap surface
SR
600 500 400 q [kPa] 300 200 100 0 0 100 200 p [kPa] 300 400 500
Shear mechanism
Cap surface
SR
Procedure:
PS from plastic condition For given SR state compute o f1 = 0
Remarks
1
SR = K NC 1 sin() in the standard applications Ko o (approximate Jakys formula) SR = 1 for case of isotropic consolidation (used in triaxial Ko testing for instance)
For sands notion of preconsolidation pressure is not as meaningful as for cohesive soils hence one may assume OCR=1 and eect of density will be embedded in H and M parameters
Eoed
1
Material properties
Parameter ref Eur ref E50 ref m ur Rf c emax ft D M H OCR /q POP ref Eo 0.7 Unit [kPa] [kPa] [kPa] [] [] [] [kPa] [o ] [o ] [] [kPa] [] [] [kPa] [/kPa] [kPa] [] HS-standard yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no no HS-small yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
10m
10m
HS-std HS-small
0.001
0.01
0.1
(a) 1 (1 ) (Z Soil) 3
4 3.5 SIG-1 / SIG-3 [kPa] 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 -EPS-Y [-] HS-std HS-small
(b) G ( ) (Z Soil)
0 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 -EPS-V [-] 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 -0.01 -0.02 -EPS-Y [-] HS-std HS-small 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
(d) v (1 ) (Z Soil)
200000 180000 160000 140000 G [kPa] 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
3.5 3
HS-std HS-small
0 0.00001 0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
(a) 1 (1 ) (Z Soil) 3
4 3.5 SIG-1 / SIG-3 [kPa] 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 EPS-1 [-] HS-std HS-small
(b) G ( ) (Z Soil)
0 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 EPS-V [-] 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 -0.01 -0.02 EPS-1 [-] HS-std HS-small 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
(d) v (1 ) (Z Soil)
300000 250000 200000 G [kPa] 150000 100000 50000 0 0.00001 0.0001 HS-std HS-small
4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 EPS-1 [-]
0.001
0.01
0.1
EPS-1-EPS-3 [-]
(a) 1 (1 ) (Z Soil) 3
4 3.5 SIG-1 / SIG-3 [kPa] 3
EPS-V [-]
(b) G ( ) (Z Soil)
0 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 -0.01 HS-std HS-small 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
HS-std HS-small
(d) v (1 ) (Z Soil)
Given 3 drained triaxial test results for 3 conning pressures: 3 = 100 kPa 3 = 300 kPa 3 = 600 kPa
Shear characteristics q 1 Dilatancy characteristics v 1 Stress paths in p q plane Measurements of small strain stiness moduli Eo (3 ) for the assumed conning pressures (through direct measurement of shear wave velocity in the sample)
M* =
1
6 sin 3 sin
c* =
6c cos 3 sin
p
1500
1800
Here: = arcsin
c=0
1
EPS-V [-]
0.03 0.02 0.01 0 -0.01 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
EPS-1 = - EPS-3 [-]
Dilatancy cut-off
= arcsin
d 2+d
1 d=0.75
V 0.03
0.02 0.01 0 -0.01 -0.02 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.1
= arcsin
0.75 2 + 0.75
16o
Analytical formula: Eo =
ref + c cot Measured: shear wave velocity vs at 1 = 106 and at given conning stress 3 Compute : shear modulus Go = vs2 Compute : Young modulus Eo = 2 (1 + ) Go 3 [kPa] 100 300 600 Eo [kPa] 250000 460000 675000
ref Eo
+ c cot 3
Analytical formula: Eo =
ref + c cot Measured: shear wave velocity vs at 1 = 106 and at given conning stress 3 Compute : shear modulus Go = vs2 Compute : Young modulus Eo = 2 (1 + ) Go 3 [kPa] 100 300 600 Eo [kPa] 250000 460000 675000
ref Eo
+ c cot 3
Reanalyze Eo vs 3 in logarithmic scales 13.1 12.55 Averaged slope yields m; here m = = 0.55 1.0 Find intersection of the line with axis ln Eo at + c cot 3 ln =0 ref + c cot Here the intersection is at 12.43 hence ref = e 12.43 2.71812.43 = 250000 kPa Eo
13.6 13.4 13.2
ln Eo 13
12.8 12.6 12.4 12.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
m 1
12.43
To estimate small strain modulus Go at a certain depth one may use empirical formula by Mayne and Rix: q 0.695 Go = 49.4 t1.13 [MPa] e qt is a corrected tip resistance expressed in MPa e is the void ratio
2000
1500
f ( 3 = 100) q50
1000
f q50 ( 3 = 100) 500 f q50 ( 3 = 100)
0 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
Reanalyze E50 vs 3 in logarithmic scales Here we can x m to the one obtained for small strain moduli Find intersection of the line with axis ln E50 at + c cot 3 ln =0 ref + c cot Here the intersection is at 10.30 hence ref e 10.30 2.71810.30 30000 kPa E50
11.4 11.2 11
ln E50
10.8 10.6 10.4 10.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
10.30
The unloading reloading modulus as well as oedometric moduli are usually not accessible
ref once we know We can use Alpans diagram to deduce Eur ref ref (default is Eur = 3); for cohesive soils like tertiary clays Eo ref Eo this value is larger
For oedometric modulus at the reference stress ref = 100 ref = E ref kPa we can assume Eoed 50 0.7 = 0.0001...0.0002 for sands and 0.7 = 0.00005...0.0001 for clays Smaller 0.7 values yield softer soil behavior
Interface wall-soil
90m
30m
120m
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
HS HS-small MC
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
HS HS-small MC
UY [m]
X [m]
Conclusions
Model properly reproduces strong stiness variation with shear strain It can be used in simulations of soil-structure interaction problems Implementation is rather heavy It should properly predict deformations near the excavations Model reduces excessive heavings at the bottom of the excavation