Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REVIEW
Alicia Brcena
Antonio Prado
ECONOMIC
COMMISSION FOR
LATIN AMERICA
AND THE CARIBBEAN
Osvaldo Sunkel
Chairman of the Editorial Board
Andr Hofman
Director
Miguel Torres
Technical Editor
CIP
/ . :
, 2012.11
ISBN 978-7-80234-857-8
. . . . F173.04-53
CIP2012242500
CEPAL Review Special Chinese Edition
Copyright by Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean / ECLAC
United Nations 2012
This work was originally published by Economic Commission for Latin America
and the Caribbean / ECLAC. This Chinese translation was arranged by the Deutsche
Gesellschaft fr Internationale Zusammenarbeit / GIZ. In case of any discrepancies, the
original language will govern.
168 100037
ISBN 978-7-80234-857-8
8891194mm 1/16
17.75
500
2012121
2012121
90.00
01068990535 68990692
01084604601 84604602
http://www.develpress. com. cn
viola_lu@yeah. net
CEPAL REVIEW
Alicia Brcena
III
Alicia Brcena
21
Osvaldo Rosales
1990~2006
41
55
Rhys Jenkins
69
85
109
Dani Rodrik
131
Manuel R. Agosin
147
Ricardo Ffrench-Davis
163
185
Ramn Lpez
205
221
1990~2005
Simone Cecchini Andras Uthoff
235
273
201211
CEPAL REVIEW
CEPAL
Review
ECLACCDRF
30
20125
CAF
LAIA
2005~2010
Observatory
1976
Ral Prebisch36
4000
Thomson
ReutersSSCI
2000~2011
Journal of Economic
Literature
15
201211
II
CEPAL REVIEW
CDRF
BMZ
GIZ
Alicia Brcena
201211
III
CEPAL REVIEW
27
80
GIZ
30
GIZ
201211
1
CEPAL REVIEW 10020104
Alicia Brcena
Alicia Brcena
alicia.barcena@cepal.org
ECLAC
2008
2090
19981999
2080
2000~2001
GDP
20706%20
802%2090
2003~2008
3%
208090
2070
Ffrench-Davis2005
Stiglitz2006
200220
80
90
2090
1989
Ocampo2005
90
2002
2070
2003~2007
2090
5%5
3%
11%7.4%
1044%34%
2009a
2090
199412
2003~2008
3.6%
2010
33%
138%
25%
11%
Rosales
2009
2009b
2009f
2002~2008
2008b
a 2009
20081.8
208090
2008
1990
48%200833%
2002
2080
8090
2002
30
2009d
20086
2002~2008
2080
-18%-10%-9%
198020084400
900
-8%
1980~2008
2002~2008
20052006
2002~2008
44%34%19.4%12.9%
5255
0.550.52
0.550.52
5~106
3%5
2009d
2008
2002~2008
BRBOHNNICOPYARPAGT
CLMXDOSVPEECCRUYVE
182002~2008
-1.8%7
1.6PinedaPrez-Caldentey
Titelman2009
2009
1982~1983-1.8%
20021983
FDI6
4.8%
2008
12009-1.5%
8.3%
2008644.13
2009530
9008
2008118
900
200992
500
2009
2009a
24%25%
2009f
2009b2009g
2009hOrozco
2009
40
78
KacefJimnez
20078.9%
2009
7.2%2009
20104.1%
2009a
SME
2009eSojo2009
2009
2010
2006
2009
a
10
1990~2009
11
2009
2004~2007
34
OECD
84
12
200910
20101
20092009
1990~20071
10
52120083.1
22009
2007~20081.25
1.
650020093500
20106700
2009
Ocampo2005
10 1950~2008
2000
13
10
2007
Prebisch1949
2007
11 1970~2006
14
2.
112080
9090
2000~2006
2003~20072
3680
203
905
CimoliPorcile2008
12
11
2080
30~50
90
75Samaniego2009
90
Fajnzylber
1990
15
12 ab1996~2006
a
b
PADIINE
DANEINEGIIBGEBEA
2009c
2020
200912
22020
2050
16
3.
Hopenhayn2001
2080
InfanteSunkel2009
2090
20
2006
1990~2008
85
15
2002~2008
2009d
1990~2008
4.
15
2002~2008
1.71990~2008
Martner2007
17
10
20062007
1
1/3
2008
20082009
-0.3-2.8
18
1998
2008
2009
20104.1
2010
18
19
21
CEPAL REVIEW
Osvaldo Rosales
FDI
Osvaldo Rosales
osvaldo.rosales@cepal.org
22
CEPAL REVIEW
2016PPP
GDP
2010
6%20114%2003~2008
30
Rosales2009
OECD
SME
CEPAL REVIEW
23
2009
2015
2010b
12001~2008
2015
1/420092/3
1/3
2010
IMF
Economic Perspectives20114
2017
10
2010
79%
30%
2.5%
2010
10.5%1.7%
2001
32000
200720272040
205084%
2008
24
CEPAL REVIEW
1 1979~2010
2 2000~2012
20114
CEPAL REVIEW
25
1/21/3
1/21/4
20081990
5%
2010
23.1%14.5%
415.4%11.4%
G7
30%
G20
20%
53%28%23%2000~2007
1980~2016
10
20114
26
CEPAL REVIEW
4 2007~2010
WTO20102011/62820114
*
CEPAL REVIEW
27
10%40%
43%
2015
20101
2010
12
ASEAN
5 20002009
28
CEPAL REVIEW
1%
1.
218%
2090
60%
17
200440%
14
2080
20%2009 13%20
2090
1716
20002009
2009(DOTS)
COMTRADE
CEPAL REVIEW
29
2000~2020a
a 16
30
CEPAL REVIEW
2000~2009
CACM
20002009
200912
200912
>10%
<10%
CEPAL REVIEW
31
90%
70%
2008
23
2008
24
710
10
3
MERCOSUR
32
CEPAL REVIEW
7 1985~2009
10
a
CEPAL REVIEW
90%
33
Rosales2010
20
2007JenkinsDussell
80%
Peters2009JenkinsDussell Peters
2001~2006
5052
200511
4%
2003
90%85%
2008
20092010
2.
34
CEPAL REVIEW
9%17%
13%8
90%
2009
17%
Sinopec71
41095%
YPF40%
CNOOC
Sinochem
2010
Chinalco
Minmetals
150
Wuhan
2008~2009
MOFCOM20104
CEPAL REVIEW
35
Huawei
32011227
ZTE
BYD
CheryGeely
8 2006~2010a
a 80%
2011415
36
CEPAL REVIEW
21
2010
2010
CEPAL REVIEW
37
2010
20101
11945
10
IIRSA
CCPIT
IDBCAF
2015
38
CEPAL REVIEW
2009
(a)
(b)
(c)
Osvaldo Rosales2009
1125www.cepal.org/comercio
CEPAL REVIEW
39
200811
2008
2007
LAPA
Rosales2010
20114
41
CEPAL REVIEW 9820098
1990~2006
Roberto lvarez E.Eugenio Figueroa B.
Mara Pa Figueroa Z.Macarena Palma E.
1990~2006
79
Roberto lvarez E.
ralvarez@bcentral.cl
Eugenio Figueroa B.
efiguero@econ.uchile.cl
Mara Pa Figueroa Z.
mfiguero@fen.uchile.cl
Macarena Palma E.
mpalma@fen.uchile.cl
42
20
15%LehmannMoreno
Jaramillo2007
Mesquita Moreira
2007Moreira
1990~200679
17
115.43158.4
9%
14.8206.1
66.3884.3
2.465.3
11.7335.2
11990~2006530
7900
41057002
41990~2006
82%1990
80.3669.6
Leamer1984
Blzquez-LidoyRodrguezSantiso2006Claro
2006DevlinEstevadeordalRodrguez-Clare2006
RosalesKuwayama2007
1990~2006
: 1990~2006
10
COMTRADE
1990~2006
10
COMTRADE
1990~2006
43
44
1990~2006
10
COMTRADE
1990~2006
45
41%200667%2006
61%
PerkinsSyrquin1989
41%
2090
Leamer1995
0.74%
0.43%0.36%0.09%0.34%
0.31%20060.53%
1990~2006
a 19902006
COMTRADE
1990~2006
COMTRADE
1990~2006
46
1990~2006
COMTRADE
1990~2006
47
1.
Tinbergen1962
BaierBergstrand
2007Rose
2004BlumGoldfarb
2006
Leamer1987
(1)
X ij ijGDP i
iDIST
BORDLANG
791343
(2)
123
1990~2006
ln (1+X)
792
2.
COMTRADE 4
SITC2
1990~2006 5
Leamer1984
15
Leamer1987
Schott2003
comtrade.un.org
19621990
1990~2006
48
Rose2004
BosworthCollins
CEPII
2003
http://www.cepii.org/anglaisgraph/bdd/bdd.htm
(3)
190%
-1.98-1.47
Rose2004
1990~2006
49
10%10%
79
(4)
PerkinsSyrquin1989
Hanson
Xiang2004
35%
1990~2006
1990~2006
50
WacziargHorn-
Welch20031990~2000
40%
73%
20%
20%
1990~2006
51
Leamer
E.E. LeamerThe Heckscher-Ohlin model in theory and practicePrinceton Studies in International Finance77
1995
1990~2006
52
http://go.worldbank.org/LGOXFTV550
1990~2006
53
1990~2006
55
CEPAL REVIEW 10320114
Rhys Jenkins
2002~2008
15
17
Rhys Jenkins
R.O.Jenkins@uea.ac.uk
56
Lehmann
2007Cesa-Bianchi2009Caldern
2002~2008
2009
2005
II20065Streifel
2006ParkZhai2006
2006CheungMorin20072008
2002~2007
2006
20
2007
comtrade
2007
2/3
Lehmann
MorenoJaramillo2007
2007
57
15 1
20022007
2007152600
2/3
1/3
2008I.8GallagherPorzecanski2009
RosalesKuwayama200785
Streifel2006
200652
GDP
20052.2
CheungMorin
2007
20092.5
40%
20082008
2002
2.1E.08.II.D.21
2002~2007
CheungMorin20074
2002~2007
1/51/3
200549~50
20042008
2002
2070
2000
2090
1SITC0-468
200545
58
CheungMorin2007
200547~492070
2004
2002~2007
1/1027
1/4
1995~20041
20064-3
2.8
2006
4-14-2
2002
21
Caldern2009
542002~2003
2005
22002~2007
2009
6163
3021
20
9021
2002
22004
3199085%
200345%200574
59
200725%
20092
20081.42002~2007
113%
SDR80%
20082.1
20065.1
20022007
2525%
12%
20092
2002
20072008
2008
2007315
52003~2007
4.6%
2007
Timmer20101
2002~2007
200715
2002~2007
4
2007
2002
5
Dollar2009Timmer
4
2010
60
BP
20022007
2008
FAO
2007
2002~2007
2007
20071715
2007
20062008
23
1.
2002~2007
32002~2007
61
2007
a 2002~20072007
2
2007
a 2002~20072007
3
62
2.
2090
Ray2008
2090
2002
2002
2002
170200670
(COCHILCO)2008
2003~2006
WilliamsHarlyn Meade2007
40%
Ostensson2005
10%~25%
180%
2002~2006
OPEC
2002
20081.18
10%
20081.5
61995~2004
200%12%~37%
2006A.6
63
2007
2002
Ray2008
15
152007
410~730560
20071521%
7%
3/4
10%
2007
1217
4.5
~12
15
16%
340~610410~730
64
152007
2007
415
6172007
15
2002
20%~50%
65
7%~20%
10%
Jenkins2008
Devlin20062Ellis20092
Gonzlez2008
340
420~750
20074102002
66
Latin America and the Caribbean, Washington, D.C., InterAmerican Development Bank.
DFID (Department for International Development) (2005), China
and Forest Trade in the Asian Pacific Region: Implications
for Forests and Livelihoods: Overview, London.
Dollar, D. (2009), Can China become the engine of world
economic growth?, East Asia & Pacific on the rise [online]
http://blogs. worldbank.org/eastpacific/print/2558
ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the
Caribbean) (2008), Economic and Trade Relations between
Latin America and Asia-Pacific: the Link with China, (LC/
L.2959), Santiago, Chile, October.
Ellis, R.E. (2009), China in Latin America: The Whats and
Wherefores, Boulder, Lynne Reiner.
FAPRI (Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute) (s/f),
Elasticities Database, University of Iowa [online] http://
www. fapri.iastate.edu/tools/elasticity.aspx
Gallagher, K. and R. Porzecanski (2009), China and the Latin
America commodities boom: a critical assessment, Working
Paper, No. 192, Amherst, Political Economy Research
Institute, University of Massachusetts.
Gonzalez, F. (2008), Latin America in the economic equation.
Winners and losers: what can losers do?, Chinas Expansion
into the Western Hemisphere: Implications for Latin
America and the United States, R. Roett and G. Paz (eds.),
Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press.
IISI (International Iron and Steel Institute) (2008), World Steel in
Figures, 2008, Brussels.
(2004), World Steel in Figures, 2004, Brussels.
IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2008), World Economic
Outlook, Washington, D.C., April.
(2006), World Economic Outlook, Washington, D.C.,
September.
Jenkins, R. (2008), Chinas global growth and Latin American
exports, wider Research Paper, No. 2008/104, Helsinki,
United Nations University/World Institute for Development
Economics Research.
Krichene, N. (2005), A simultaneous equation model for world
crude oil and natural gas markets, IMF Working Papers, No.
05/32, Washington, D.C., International Monetary Fund.
Lehmann, S., D. Moreno and P. Jaramillo (2007), China,
commodity prices and Latin American performance: a few
stylized facts, Working Paper, No. 424, Santiago, Chile,
Central Bank of Chile.
Ostensson, O. (2005), The Outlook for Iron Ore Supplies,
presentation at the OECD Special Meeting at High Level on
Steel (Paris, 12 -13 January 2005).
Park, C-Y. and F. Zhai (2006), Asias imprint on global commodity
markets, ERD Working Paper, No. 90, Manila, Asian
67
Development Bank.
Ray, D. (2008), Chinas Dramatic Growth in Soybean Imports
and Its Commodity Price Impact, Knoxville, University of
Tennessee, Agricultural Policy Analysis Center.
Rosales, O. and M. Kuwayama (2007), Latin America meets China
and India: prospects and challenges for trade and investment,
CEPAL Review, No. 93 (LC/G.2347-P), Santiago, December.
Sarmiento, C. and P.G. Allen (2003), Dynamics of beef supply in
the presence of co-integration: a new test of the backward
bending hypothesis, Review of Agricultural Economics, vol.
22, No. 2, Wisconsin, Agricultural & Applied Economics
Association.
Slade, M. (1992), Environmental costs of natural resource
commodities: magnitude and incidence, Policy Research
Working Papers, No. 991, Washington, D.C., World Bank.
Solingen, B. and R. Sedjo (1996), A comparison of timber models
for use in public policy analysis, Discussion Papers, No.
96-12, Washington, D.C., Resources for the Future.
Streifel, S. (2006), Impact of China and India on Global Commodity
Markets: Focus on Metals and Minerals and Petroleum,
Washington, D.C., World Bank.
Timmer, H. (2010), Can China become the engine for world
economic growth?, Prospects for Development [online]
http:// blogs.worldbank.org/prospects/print/562
UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development)
(2009), Trade and Development Report 2009 (UNCTAD/
TDR/2009), Geneva.
(2008), Trade and Development Report 2008 (UNCTAD/
TDR/2008), Geneva. United Nations publication, Sales No.
E.08.II.D.21.
(2005), Trade and Development Report 2005 (UNCTAD/
TDR/2005), Geneva. United Nations publication, Sales No.
E.05.II.D.13.
United States International Trade Commission (2006), The effects
of increasing Chinese demand on global commodity
markets, Staff Research Study, No. 28, Washington, D.C.
Valdez, A. and J. Zietz (1980), Agricultural Protection in OECD
Countries, Washington, D.C., International Food Policy
Research Institute.
Williams, L. (2007), Global Capital and the Zinc Market, Global
Capital Conference [online] http: //www.mineweb.com/
mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page36?oid=37500&sn=Detail
Williams, G. and R.L. Thompson (1984), Brazilian soybean
policy: the international effects of intervention, American
Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 66, No. 4, Wisconsin,
Agricultural & Applied Economics Association.
World Bank (2009), Global Economic Prospects 2009, Washington,
D.C.
69
CEPAL REVIEW 7420018
WTO
NAFTA
2000101
Eduardo Gitli
(CINPE),
egitli@racsa.co.cr
Randall Arce
(CINPE),
marce@racsa.co.cr
70
199911
GATT
194823
1949
1985~1989
1986
20%Mody Wang1997294
19873
SEZs
10
2000
1999b
13
2~23
1990~1997GDP
11%
8%19981999
0.8%1.4%1999
BosworthOfer1995
2000b199671.2%
1
1998
51.8%
42.6%LinCai Li1998
19993
422
1997
19.6%7.3%
GNP42
7.2%5.8%
70%FDI
31997
53.7%
:1997
71
22.7%20.2%18.2%
2000a
34.8%
12.8%9.8%7.4%
7.1%
2000a4
20
1997
85%5
(1999b)
62%
1999b2~14
4
5PC-TAS
30
1987
1995
2/3
GAO20009
2/3
7
1998
12
2000
72000735
199242.7%
199817%2005
72
10%
199212471998
400
150
GAO2000
73
1.
1997
1996
7.2%19935.4%
1997
21993~1997
1.9%
413
199725.9%
15.1%497.47
12
31998
29%21.4%
13.1%
10.1%
31.9%
15
26.6%11.5%
:
()
(USDC) (MAGIC)
(PC-TAS)
2.
19991115
82000
74
1998a
10
a 21
:
25%
13.3%
49%
12%~18%
30%
15%~25%5% ~ 7.5%
1997
50%
20
200812
90
314
1999
2000
1997
24.6%2005
31%20041
9.4%
14%22%
7.l%2003
17.5%
80%~100%2006
25%
9
10
2005
10
9
6090
2000a
2000c
75
19992000519
1997
2000
3.
13
2000c
Alexander Haig
Warren Christopher
11
1999
11
Bates
20009
1999
MFNPNTR
1974
Lardy2000
76
199013.9%
199811.4%
12
0.2%0.5%
1999a13
19972
1999
6.6%
42000
0.7%
2
2090
1.
6
13
12
Gitli Arce2000a
1998a
a 21
77
, 1990~1999
2000519
15018.6%10.6%
70%25%10%
5226%35%5%10%
25%35%49%
750-50
2000030
2000
1994
783.7%
NAFTA
63.9%
14
1998
43.2%
19941995
Gitli Arce2000a
14
78
16.5%
20053 15
20054
2005
16
20056
15
37%
162008
1999
: 1997
(1999b
2000
CBI
2000101
17
1999b
178
79
/:
2005
a, b
1995~1998
1998
T189
CBI
1993
12.819984.5
1999b86
Gereffi2000
64%
Ng
Yeats1999
1996
199367.5199859.6
58.5%
1999b82
19
17%
28.5%33.6%
10
199542%
Arias1999; Ziga1999Gereffi
40%7%6%
2000
55%
1999b85
183.7%2.6%
2.4%6203424015 6109100012
19
6105100010
80
19842000
ab
6115
250
200416%
T61091000T
61099010
T420200416%
621210
75%
a 1990
1990
23
2005
13.1%
2.
64
81
82
10 a
1994
19900.5%19987.7%1995
10%
21
27%
4%
54%11
a
1999b871996
1998Gitli1997
0.5%
1990~1998
0%37.1%1990~1998
14.2%35.5%
2000
199082%
199818%
34.2%
66.5%
1996~1998
60%1995~1998100
1995~199828%
6406106500
/
3. 22
6404193515
4%
1998
2.8%
199047.3%199860.5%1994
63.3%
30.3%5.5%30%
201995
0.2%
208%
21
1999c
229018908000
83
11
a
1995~1998
4. 23
19982.6%
1997
2.2%
1998
7.9%5%
2000~2005
2005
23
199412
0.2%
238473301000
84
85
CEPAL REVIEW 90200612
620
1998~20043415
Jorge Blzquez-Lidoy
blazquezlidoy@telefonica.net
Javier Rodrguez
(BBVA)
javier.rgarcia@grupobbva.com
Javier Santiso
OECD
javier.santiso@oecd.org
86
20
1
GDP
13
209.5%
2040
1%6%
2003
45
2005
2004
200410
2005
50~60
2006
Santiago SanzJuan
20
1000150
YaoLi (2003)
420032004
(Eichengreen2004 2006)
David Taguas
Spain(2004) 20
12003GDP
9.1%
11%20052003GDP
Dealogic
Alwyn Young1978~1998
1.7Young2000 2003
2003IPO
87
15
1820
GDPGDP
30%
(IMF
2004HSBC2005)
Rumbaugh
Blancher(2004)
(AhearneFernald
Rumbaugh
2003)
Blancher(2004)
(GoldsteinPinaud 2006)
(ECLAC2005Andean Development
( Eichengreen 2004)
Corporation2006)
(Lin2004LallWeiss2004)
198860%
2%2005
70%
2005
2004101
(IDB2004)
2005GDP70%
Enrique Iglesias
30%
60%~65%
Soler (2003)2003~2012
20036
(BBVA2003)
1%
2004
(BBVA2004)
6Angus Maddison
(Maddison1998)Carol ShiueWolfgang Keller
(2004a 2004b)
laeba.org/index.cfm
88
1978
(Lora,2004b)
1978~2005GDP
9.5% 20
200112
10
6.4%
11
40.6%1
2001
2090
10
(Chu Prusa2004)
112002~2004
Wei2004
20
2004
a 20051~6
b
89
1/42002
112
440
20
1980
300
0.9%2002
5%20036%2004
1990~200290%
425%
2004
304
69.2%4
UNCTAD
12
620
ECLAC
SIGCI
2004
87.4%3
199828.0%
46.6%18.6
12www.intracen.org
90
Intracen2004
Intracen2004/
91
CI
61
13
34
CS
CC
2003200280%
2001~2004
aitajttnij
200575%
ij
Aracruz
12%15
14
3415
19982004
(Paiva
de Abreu2005)
34
719982004
1320032004
1520045400
140.94
92
2002~2004a
2002~2004
2000~2002
2002~2004
93
94
1998~20012001~2004
16
2003
12.1%
Berges (2004)
17
CI
18
14
1511
200585%
16Soler(2003)
171
18www.intracen.org
95
Intracen/2004
EvansHarrigan(2003)
1994
1/4
2090
Hummels
(Deardoff2004)
2001a
HarriganVenables(2004)
(Disdier Head
Hummel (2001b)
2004)
vanWincoop (2003)
96
19
Hummels (2001b)
21
1955~1997Glaeser
Kohlhase2003
BerthelonFreund2003
20
77025%30%
22ClarkDollarMicco (2004)
CarrereSchiff
2003
1/41/4
1962~2000
12%
10%
DOT
15%
DisdierHead2004
715
55856
11
20
1/4
1/412%5000
20
ClarkDollar
Micco200430
21
1%18%
19Andersonvan Wincoop2004
20
2
22LimaoVenables200010%
20%
40%
620
15
97
CSm
1.2111
CCm
23
aittn
ajttn
92003
1998~2004CSm
24
CCm
50%
CIm8
20%2003
20031/3
1997~2004
a 2001~2004
23
a CIm
2002~2004
2000~2002
IanchovichinaWalmsley2003
242004
34.3%19977.4%2004
25.3%19975%2004
7.2%19972.3%
98
40%
66%
2004
47%40%9.3%
1983
2004
180
1002000~2004
10
LatinFocus (2004)
IanchovichinaMartin (2003)
25
(IMF2004)
( Yang2003; HSBC
2005)21
9%
20
25(IMF2004)
99
11
GDP
GDP
1952~1972
1979~1999
8.5%26 13%27
0.6%
1952~19725.8%
0.6%1979~19993.7%
Summers Heston
0.6%3
2050GDP2080
GDP1160%
15%25%28
GDPGDP
29
20056.1%
7.3%1019
26
27Summers HestonPWT 6.1Heston
Summers1997
29IanchovichinaMartin2001
28
3 GDP
Summers Heston
100
GDP321
20024.4%
209016%
7%
42000
20108%2020
18%
GDPSummers
Heston30GDP
12
GDP2002 ~2020
GDP
12312090
10.1%3.3%
3.4%20
32
30GDP
31
33
32WilsonPurushothaman
2003 GaulierLemoinenal-Kesenci,2005
2005
33(2004)
4 GDP
GDPGDP
Summers Heston
101
(Lall
Weiss2004)
2003
35 2004
2020
GDP1/4
4%
2001~2003
2090
270110
2020011502000
200420052003
52%
30%
2/3
2003550(
365 36 2004
2005600
34
10
37
(Xiao2005)
1/4
2003
35ECLAC2004a
36ECLAC2004b2003
8801999
341670
37MITHuang
2003http://www.cecc.gov/pages/
( Shixue2004)
hearings/092403/huang.php
102
2002
23%
1013
13666%
50
38
20 90
39
1991~2003
20
3502003
(McKibbin ThyeWoo
20
2003)
2004
1984~2001Garcia-Herrero
50%30%
2005
70
1995~2001
60%
16%
20042005
600
2004
80%180
40
2004
38
2004
17.5IBM50
130
(2005)
400
0.5%
2001
28
44
Chang Wong2003;
WongOpper Hu2004
39Garcia-HerreroSantabrbara2004
ChantasasawatFung2004
EichengreenTong2005a2005bMercereau2005
40UNCTAD2004
103
(BBVA)
2001
300
4002004
10
15
EMBRAER42
20
MARCOPOLO
Embraco1995
WEG
Gerday
INBEV
2500
2.5
200410
Ricardo Hausmann
Dani Rodrik
41
2006
,Rodrik2006
HausmanHwangRodrik2006
41
2004232008
10020034027%
70
(Kemmerer mission
240003000
20045040%(The
(Jeffrey Sachs
2004
IBM
Huang2005http://
web.mit.edu/yshuang/www/
42Goldstein2004
104
1.1
CIa1998~2004b
a CI
2004
1.2
Intracen /2004
105
a US$/TEU
CMPCH
LSU
ClarkDollarMicco2004
106
April, unpublished.
BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria) (2003): Mxico y China
en el comercio mundial, Latinwatch, June.
(2004): Potencial econmico de China y oportunidades
para Argentina, Latinwatch, April.
Berges, R. (2004): Implications of eventual changes to Chinas peg,
Latin America Investment Strategy Implications, New York,
Merrill Lynch.
Berthelon, M. and C. Freund (2003): On the conservation of
distance in international trade, Washington, D.C., University
of Maryland/World Bank, November, unpublished.
Brun, J.F., C. Carrre and others (2005): Has distance died?
Evidence from a gravity model, World Bank Economic
Review, vol. 19, No. 1, Washington, D.C., World Bank.
Carrre, C. and M. Schiff (2003): On the geography of trade:
distance is alive and well, Universit dAuvergne/World
Bank, December, unpublished. Available in http://team.univparis1.fr/teamperso/disdier/meta.pdf
Clark, X., D. Dollar and A. Micco (2004): Port efficiency, maritime
transport costs and bilateral trade, Journal of Development
Economics, vol. 75, No. 2, Amsterdam, Elsevier, December.
Chang, E. and S. Wong (2003): Political control and performance
in Chinas listed companies, Hong Kong, University of Hong
Kong, March, unpublished.
Chantasasawat, B., K.C. Fung and others (2004): Foreign Direct
Investment in East Asia and Latin America: Is there a
Peoples Republic of China Effect?, ADBI Discussion Paper,
No. 17, Manila, Asian Development Bank.
Chu, T. and T. Prusa (2004): The Reasons for and the Impact of
Anti-dumping Protection: The Case of Peoples Republic of
China, East-West Center Working Papers, No. 69, Honolulu,
East West Center. Available in http://www.eastwestcenter.org/
stored/pdfs/ECONwp069.pdf
De Paiva de Abreu, M. (2005): Chinas emergence in the global
economy and Brazil, textos para discusso, No. 491, Rio de
Janeiro, Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, unpublished.
Deardoff, A. (2004): Local Comparative Advantage: Trade Costs
and the Pattern of Trade, Discussion Paper, No. 500,
Michigan, University of Michigan Gerald Ford School of
Public Policy, February. Available in http://www.fordschool.
umich.edu/rsie/workingpapers/Papers476-500/r500.pdf
Deutsche Bank (2004): Chinas Financial Sector: Institutional
Framework and Main Challenges, Frankfurt, January.
Disdier, A.C. and K. Head (2004): Exaggerated Reports of the
Death of Distance: Lessons from a Meta-Analysis, Paris,
Universit de Paris I Panthon Sorbonne/University of British
Columbia, February, unpublished. Available in http://team.
univ-paris1.fr/teamperso/disdier/meta.pdf
ECLAC (Economic Comission for Latin America and the
Caribbean) (2004a): The effect of Chinas accession to the
World Trade Organization on economic relations with Latin
America and the Caribbean, Latin America and the Caribbean
in the World Economy, 2002-2003, LC/G.2221-P, Santiago,
Chile. United Nations publication, Sales No. E.04.II.G.45.
107
108
109
CEPAL REVIEW 7320014
Dani Rodrik
Dani Rodrik
dani-rodrik@harvard.edu
110
2090
46%
2%801%
901982
30%61%1
80
3/4
1461%
141999
1999
Guillermo Perry
Vladimir Kliouev
111
14a
a
1999
1601
85%93%
23
Romero1999
1/3
2080
2030
19998100
1Taylor Gooby1989
112
2090
2080
1982
1999
1981
1929~193335%1933
2040
25%11981
202090
60702
20%10%
Alan Garca
BordoBoldinWhite19986
10
12131997
2Lustig1995
113
1981
Hall199820
Jacoby1998
805
Rockoff1998
10
Rockoff1998134
203040
2080
2030
Jacoby1998
29~31
2080
Glewwe
2070
114
2080
20
90
1999
Mrquez
Pages1998
2080
FerreiraPaes de Barro1999
3ILO
10
27
208090
22%34%64%69%
198649%1995
44%50%17%
25%1989~1991
22%
54%31%
Augusto Pinochet
31998
115
10
a
19997
19971.11.219997 FerreiraPaes de Barros19991
20
1999
4, 5
AmadeoCamargo1997
1998
Pessino1997
5
AmadeoCamargo1997
116
16
MrquezPages1998
4198116
1981~19881989~19931994~1998
U
2080
90
2080
2080
(Pessino
199716
81994~19981981~1988
2090
IDB
GavinHausmann1998
G N P
y it y t t
dlnyitdlnyti
117
dlnyit = it
dlnyt = t
GlewweHall1998
(dlnyit - dlnyt) = it
2
i
2
i
= + +2cov(it, t )
GavinHausmann1996
2
cov( it,
2w = 2 + 2 +2cov(, )
t )
Lustig1999
2%
2080
209080
7Lustig1999
Lustig
118
4a
a 100
1999
26a
a
1999
119
90
5%
5%7
208090
20906070
5%10%20%
2080
20905%
8.0%6070
3.0%4.6%
6
208090
2080
4.5903.2
2
2090
80
7206070
5%
120
HausamannGavin1996
22090
2090
208090
90
M2/GDP
90%
2090
8
2090
2090
8020%
2
8EasterlyIslamcStiglitz1999
2090
121
208090a
a20802090
*=99%**=95%***=90%
Rodrik1997
pf(k, l)
122
f k > 0, f l > 0, f
kk
pp
pf(k)
k0k
k0
r = pf k(k) -
(1)
r = r* -(k0 - k)
(2)
w = pf t(k)
(3)
r*
k 1
r* -(k 0 - k)
23
w
wrk
3
k = k 00
p
p
p
1rk
p
3
w
r*
k(p,,)
k(p,)=k0
3Ar = r*
wkr
123
I = w + k
HausmannGavin1996
1999
FDI
2090
20
90
Michael Gavin
Gavin1999
Gavin
124
6
a
1988~1994
*=99%**=95%***=90%
b
2090
ep
l1
l2lnw1w2wn
a1a21
w1w2
12
(2.1)
125
(2.5)
(2.6)
(2.2)
(2.7)
(2.8)
(2.9)
wn = p
(2.10)
(2.3)
2.12.2
Y = ea1l1+ea2l2+pln
2.52.6
D(e, p, Y)
a1l1+ a2l2-D(e, p, Y) = 0 .
Cobb-Douglas
D(.) =Y/e.
2.72.8
(2.4)
l1= l 1 l 2 = l2
2.4e/pa 1
1.
a 2.
e/p2.1-
2.3
= 0
w 1 w 2 w n .453
p4
(2.11)
a 1 a 2
(2.8)
1 > > 0
(2.9)
126
2.11
= -1e
2.82.8
2.52.10
2.92.9
w 1
10
2.
10 a
20
(Rodrik1998)
45
2020
127
7080
Rodrik1999
JaggersGurr1995
Pencavel(199758)
1975~199096
MrquezPages
1998
5 1970~1990
96
Domnguez
1997
128
1990
Patricio Aylwin
(Domnguez1997109~112)
Aylwin
Domnguez
1998
Cortzar1997
Hugo Chvez
1990
1992
Pinochet
1998
10
1999Chvez
Pinochet
10
10199730083.7%
6%
65.3%
1998
129
131
CEPAL REVIEW 9720094
Manuel R. Agosin
1980~2003
Manuel R. Agosin
managosin@econ.uchile.cl
132
1980~2003
2005912
20061218
2007Agosin
133
DVD
HausmannRodrik2003
Vettas
2000
HausmannKlinger2007
HausmannRodrik2006
Gerschenkron
1962
Hausmann
Rodrik2003
Romer1993
117
2080
AgosinBravo-
TL
HO
Ortega2007
Lewis1954
134
A mm
(1)
(3)
C G
Bj
Gij
Aij = 1
Aij = 0
(4)
3
Amsden1989
Wade1990WelliszLam Shin
Saw1993JanttiSaariVartiainen2005
Agosin1999AgosinBravo-Ortega
2007/
0C0
C1
2ij
16
GijHij
2
01
(2)
6HausmannRodrik2003
4Romer1993
135
(5)
r
Aij
(6)
HausmannRodrik
2003
(8)
(7)
9l,hC
l h1
h1
82070
2080
7
136
HausmannRodrikVelasco
2005
11
12
Amsden1989
10
1980~200313
11981~2003
1991~2003
2080
111213
1990
2910
11
12
10
132004~2007
137
/1981~2003
[] http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/
1991~2003
/ARBOBRCHCO
CRDRECESGUHOME
NIPAPEPNURVEBACHI
HKININDOKOMAPHTHVI
[] http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/
138
/1980~2002
a /
UNCTAD
UNCTAD
SITC
21980
2002
1992 15
HHI 14
15
14j
xijixj
ImbsWacziarg2003
U
139
/1980~2002
a /
UNCTAD
2002
1980
1980~2002
0.530.12
1986
239
0.10
16
162080
1980~2002
140
01%
DIV = 1 HHIDIV
1980~2003
3
17
1980~2003a
a 1%1961980~20032000
2000
[] http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/
UNCTAD
17
17
141
2002DIV0.78HHI0.22
1980200310.7%
DIV
5.7%
DIVRX*DIV
5.9%2.5%
DIV
6.4%3.1%
DIVRX*DIV
1980~2003
2000KaufmanKraayMastruzzi2005
1996tIV
* 010%
** 05%
*** 01%
YPC80
TRADE80
I/Y
RL
DIV
RX*DIV
= 1980
= 1980
=
= 1996
= 1 - HHI2002
=
DIVRX*DIVI/Y
[] http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/
UNCTAD
142
KaufmannKraayMastruzzi2003
OLSIV
19
DIVRX *DIV
RL
412
DIVRX *DIV
DIVRX *DIVDIV
RX *DIV
DIV
RX *DIV
DIV3/52/3
3DIV4
RX *DIV100%
DIVRX *DIV
34
DIVRX *DIVI/YRL
6.7
18
19
19AK
AK
1815~64
143
0.7%4
680%
50%
43
1980~2003
RLDIV
2000KaufmanKraayMastruzzi2005
1996
I/Y
RL
DIV
RX*DIV
=
= 1996
= 1 - HHI2002
=
[] http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/UNCTAD
144
a III3IV4IV
45
HausmannKlinger2007
20
20
145
Agosin, M.R. (2007), Trade and growth: why Asia grows faster
than Latin America, Growth with Equity in Latin America,
R. Ffrench-Davis and J.L. Machinea (eds.), Basingstoke,
Palgrave-Macmillan.
(1999), Trade and growth in Chile, cepal Review, No. 68
(LC/G.2039-P), Santiago, Chile, August.
Agosin, M.R. and C. Bravo-Ortega (2007), The Emergence of New
Successful Export Activities in Chile, Washington, D.C., InterAmerican Development Bank.
Amsden, A. (1989), Asias Next Giant: South Korea and Late
Industrialization, New York, Oxford University Press.
Gerschenkron, A. (1962), Economic Backwardness in Historical
Perspective, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University
Press.
Hausmann, R. and D. Rodrik (2006), Doomed to Choose: Industrial
Policy as Predicament, Cambridge, Massachusetts, John F.
Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
(2003), Economic development as self-discovery,
Journal of Development Economics, vol. 72, No. 2,
Amsterdam, Elsevier.
Hausmann, R., D. Rodrik and A. Velasco (2005), Growth
Diagnostics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, John F. Kennedy
School of Government, Harvard University, unpublished.
Hausmann, R. and B. Klinger (2007), The structure of the
product space and the evolution of comparative advantage,
cid Working Paper, No. 146, Center of International
Development, Harvard University, April.
Imbs, J. and R. Wacziarg (2003), Stages of diversification,
147
CEPAL REVIEW 102201012
Ricardo Ffrench-Davis
GDP
GDP
Ricardo Ffrench-Davis
rffrench@fen.uchile.cl
148
20
GDP
GDP
GDP
GDP
1990~2008GDP
3.2%1
GDP
1990
Blanchard
DellAricciaMauro2010
1Ffrench-Davis2006
Davis20062008
199719971998
2000Williamson20032005
Rodrik2006Ocampo2008
149
GDP
GDPGDP
2090
901997
90
1997
1997Fischer1993
(BlanchardDellAricciaMauro20103)
19GDP1970~2009
61971~1980
GDP
2009
150
1990~2009
GDP
3
GDP
1/3
1
2008
1990~2008GDP
GDPG727%
3.2%
23%
34G7123
2003GDP
2004~20085GDP5.4%
GDP
702009
GFCF
2008
GDPGDP
70
1990~2008GDP
GDP
18.5%7023.3%
3
21990~20123.2%2010~2012
2010Ffrench-
GDP15%
Davis 2010b
1971~2009
GDP
20002009
GDP
151
GDPa
GDP
2000
80
620102
GDP
Ffrench-Davis2006122
GDPa
GDP*
20
90
G D P
GDPGDP*GDPGDPa
1990~1994
1996~19972004~2007
GDP
5
4GDP
Ffrench-Davis20067
19GDP1990~2009
152
Marfn2005
2009a
Kaminsky
ReinhartVegh2004Ocampo2007
201011.8
2004~20081990~1994
1996~1997
2003~2007
2009a2010
2008~2009
191990~2009
GDP
GDP
153
1977~19811991~1994
1995~19972004~2007
Krugman
2000Rodrik1988Stiglitz2000Harberger
1985Heymann2000Ocampo2007
GDP
TFP9
Reisen2003
7Fanelli2003Frenkel2003Reisen2003
8CalvoMendoza2000
9GDPGDP
154
1991~1994
1995~19972008~2009
Uthoff
Titelman1998
10
11
101
10Prasad2003Singh
2006
11ILO
Ffrench-Davis2010b
155
20105
GDP
GDP
1.
GDPGDP
GDP
91990~2009
GDPGDPGDP*
R. Ffrench-DavisReforming Latin Americas Economies after Market
FundamentalismPalgrave Macmillan2006ECLAC
Time for equality: closing gaps, opening trailsLC/G.243233/320105II.9,
A. HofmanH. Tapia1995-2000Potential output in Latin America: a
standard approach for the 1950-2000 periodEstudios estadsticos y prospectivos25LC/L.2042-P
ECLAC2003E.03.II.G.205
156
2007~20082070
2003
2008
207080
GDP15%1990
19988Ffrench-
Davis2010c
BourguignonWalton2007
2.
GDP
Ffrench-Davis2006III.1III.2De Long
Summers1991
3.
Ffrench-Davis
20063AizenmanMarion1999
Agosin2007
Easterly Servn2003
1998
157
1998Rodrik2008
SMEs
GDP
4.
4/5
Ffrench-Davis2006
1990~19971998~2003GDP
5 12
90%1.9%
GDPFfrench-Davis2006
620102
12GDP
199019986.5%Ffrench-Davis
2010cVII.6
2.7%2010II.2
GDP
GDP
GDP
13
1320102
Ffrench-Davis2008
1.
Krugman2009Griffith-Jones
158
OcampoStiglitz2009BlanchardDellAriccia
Mauro2010
3.
FfrenchDavis2010a
2009
MartnerTromben2004
2.
1/5
Williamson2000Agosin2007Rodrik
2008Eichengreen2008
GDPGDP
BlanchardDellAricciaMauro2010
Williamson2000
159
2007
2070
GDP11
2010
4.
French-Davis2006
25Ocampo2008
2090
(1)
StallingsStudart2005
(2)
160
GDP199019987.1%1999
Ocampo2008Stiglitz
20083.8%
2000Williamson2003
2090
1990GDP
GDP
2009b
30
2090
encaje
1998
MahaniShinWang
encaje
Magud
Reinhart2006EdwardsRigobon2009
GDP
7%2090
2001
Ffrench-Davis
20031999
30
161
Agosin, M. (2007), Trade and growth: why Asia grows faster than
Latin America, Economic Growth with Equity: Challenges
for Latin America, R. Ffrench-Davis and J.L. Machinea (eds.),
New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
Aizenman, J. and N. Marion (1999), Volatility and investment:
interpreting evidence from developing countries, Economica,
vol.66, No. 262, London, London School of Economics and
Political Science.
Akerlof, G. (2007), The missing motivation in macroeconomics,
American Economic Review, vol. 97, No. 1, Nashville,
Tennessee, American Economic Association, March.
Blanchard, O., G. DellAricciaand P. Mauro (2010), Rethinking
macroeconomic policy, IMF Staff Position Note, SPN/10/03,
Washington, D.C., International Monetary Fund, February.
Bourguignon, F. and M. Walton (2007), Is greater equity necessary
for higher long-term growth in Latin America?, Economic
Growth with Equity: Challenges for Latin America, R.
Ffrench-Davis and J.L. Machinea (eds.), New York, Palgrave
Macmilan.
Calvo, G. and E. Mendoza (2000), Rational contagion and the
globalization of securities markets, Journal of International
Economics, vol. 51, No. 1, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
De Long, J.B. and L. Summers (1991), Equipment investment and
economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.
106, No. 2, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.
Dodd, R. and S. Griffith-Jones (2007), Report on derivatives
markets: stabilizing or speculative impact on Chile and
a comparison with Brazil(LC/W.134), Santiago, Chile,
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean
(ECLAC).
Easterly, W. and L. Servn (2003), The Limits of Stabilization:
Infrastructure, Public Deficits and Growth in Latin America,
Stanford, California, StanfordUniversity Press.
ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean)
(2010), Time for Equality: Closing Gaps, Opening Trails
(LC/G.2432(SES.33/3)), Santiago, Chile, May.
(2009a), Economic Survey of Latin America and the
Caribbean 2008-2009 (LC/G.2410-P), Santiago, Chile, July.
United Nations publication, Sales No.E.09.II.G.2.
(2009b), Preliminary Overview of the Economies of Latin
America and the Caribbean 2009 (LC/G.2424-P),Santiago,
Chile.United Nations publication, Sales No.E.09.II.G.149.
(2000), Equity, Development and Citizenship (LC/G.2071/
162
163
CEPAL REVIEW 9720094
20089
2030
jao2128@columbia.edu
164
2030
IMF
20081112
Calvo20082008
2003~2007
2008
2007
2009
200820089
2008
20091
2008914
1020%
AIG
91718
UNDP
165
Charles Kindleberger
KindlebergerAliber2005
2060
Bordo
2001
2080
2080
198710
2030
19992004
Minsky198225
10
166
20083
2007820083
20083
200833~4
20078
20079
20089
10
a
b
AIG
H.4.12009
167
a2008915
H.151997
7000
10
AIG
107
AIG
9101112
9000
200811
20091
1.3
GDP9%
2009
8~11
70%
168
8000GDP6%
10
2102
10221
11
11
20088200918550
GDP6%
20092008
11
20
20078
5~6
2008
2009
GDP1.5%GDP
20091
0.4%2009I.1
2008
2008
2009
2009
1GDP0.6%2
2008
2009
5%~6%
1H.3200911.698
200888430
2130GDP3.8%
169
2003~2007
2009
RathaMohopatraXu2008
1.
2003~2006
9.3%GDP3.8%
2006
2009I.1
GDP
3%2008
20072008
20089
2%2009I.9
2008
13.8%5.1%
2009I.12009
32008
2.1%2009I.1
3.1
, 1945~1980 = 100
170
ECLAC
2008
200923
2008
2080
2070
21
2008
2009II.6
2/5
171
Von Braun2007
20072008
2003~2007
2008
11
2070
2001~2007
2090
15%5
11
2009I.42009
2003~2007
25
10%
231112
2007
2007
2008a
3.
40
20
7020
90
2002
2004
4Jara
5OcampaTovar2008
Tovar2008Ocampo2007
172
173
20062007
20049
20062007
11301000
200410
2/3Ocampo
2007457
2007
20053
2006
20062007
70
2004
2004
174
175
2004
20075
2007
2008
5200657
200779
200657
210
102312.35%
2007
129%~10%
10
2004
20085
2~3
910
200869
2004
67
820089
0.5
2007
200920076000
2009
2008
20043.5
20089
2009
6BustilloVelloso (2009)
176
EMBI =
a
177
2070
GDP1
GDP
GDP1
90
2008c
JimnezTromben
2006
IDB
2008IzquierdoRomero
Talvi2008
Ocampo2007
2003
2008GDP5%
62008
20
2%
2008
2007
20087
2007
7IDB20083
2008b4
2008
178
2000
2006
2006
179
2003
8GDP
76
2008
20062007
2008
2009
2009
a 2003
180
CEPAL REVIEW 9720094
2000)
GDP
181
182
2008910
183
185
CEPAL REVIEW 102201012
Ramn Lpez
20
Ramn Lpez
rlopez@arec.umd.edu
186
Krugman2006
Paul Krugman
Taylor2008
20
Farrell
10%20
Grant2005
8035%200750%
Saez2009
10%50%
1917~1928
10%1996~2007
40%49%40%50%
PickettySaez2003
20
187
JerzmanowskiNabar2008
PhilipponReshef2009
1.
30
20
1/5
Lpez
Stocking2009
320
2.
50
205040%21
20%
Ghertner Fripp
2007
188
1947~2007
a 1972~2008
a
R.C. Feenstra, J. RomalisP. SchottUnited States imports, exports and tariff data, 19892001,
93872001http://www.internationaldata.org/
189
1900~2004
Barbier2005
30
LpezStocking2009
(1)
2070/
de Janvry1975
20
NIC
SokoloffEngerman2000AcemogluJohnson
Robinson2001Khor2000
20
Krugman1994LallAlbaladejo2004
Noland1997
3.
NIC
190
PPIa1913~2007
4
207080
(2)
2080
2080
Bosworth
Collins2008P anagariya2006Lpez
2008LallAlbaladejo2004
20
22070
Lpez2008
2%
3Rodrik200720
LevinsonTaylor2008
191
1990~2008
10
5
4
20
8%3
192
213500
1/3
1.11
50%
20002000~2007
20%2080
5%
4.
2090521-
-50%
5%
2090
108%~10%
67
20
1980~2006
EIA
193
USDA
NGO
6
Da Motta20031991
Simpson
HuberRuitenbeckda Motta1998
TomanAyres2005
EngelLpez2008
194
2003~2007
200625%
20092010
20
BohringerLoschel2003
LoschelZhang2002
CO2
195
1.
2080
2.
25
CaprioDemirguc-KuntKane2008
Sloan1997910
2080
AutorKatzKearney2006
AutorKatzKearney2006AutorLevyMurnane
2003Carddi Nardo2002
GordonDew-Becker2007
KaplanRauh2009
1%
2080
196
2%
0.3%
198054%2006
5%15.5
47%20%
29
5%4%
5%
17%22.5%2007
3.
4003.5
1.5%1980~2006
55%50%
10%8%
10%20%
27%
30
2080
4.820075.211
1967~2005
10 1961~2001
WIIDUNU-WIDER
11 1967~2007
2007
197
198
BooneGirouardWanner
2001McConnellMosserPerez- Quiros
8
1999
1/8
202
208045%2004120%
2%~2.5%
Taylor2008
0.3%
4.
20
1.220800.45
20%
199
2005~2007
8%~10%
10
BosworthCollins2008
2003~2007
CPI
20041
200441.25%2007
5%12
10
12 2001~2009
200
1929
2020
20
201
35%
20506091%2009
2002080
60%
18
2080
11
11
202
203
205
CEPAL REVIEW 78200212
Gustav Ranis
Henry R. Luce
YCIAS
Frank Altschu
gustav.ranis@yale.edu
Frances Stewart
frances.stewart@queenelizabethhouse.oxford.ac.uk
206
Al
Berry
RanisStewart Ramirez
2000
Albert Berry2002419
20
Tavneet Suri
Prateek Tandon
1UNDP
UNDP19909
10
2BerryUrrutia1976Berry
ed.1988
1. A
207
a NGO:
HD
GDP
GNP
31991
208
SchultzTansel1993
BRAC
Riddell 1995
Wood1994
AinsworthBeegleNyamete1995
2. B
Psacharopoulos199248
8AB
AB
5
6Barro1991BarroLee1993ab
7Michaely1977Krueger1978Ram1985
4Schultz (1975)Welch1970Rosenzweig1995
Rana1988Edwards1993
FosterRosenzweig1994
8AlesinaRodrik1994AlesinaPerotti1994
5Behrman19931996
PerssonTabellini1994BirdsallRoss Sabot1995
3.
209
1970~1992
B
35~76
1960 ~1992A
1962~1982
A1:
A2
A3
A4
1970~1992
A
4.
1
3
1.75
B1
B2
B3
210
1960 ~ 2000
21960~2000
UNDP
HDI9
9UNDP25
85
UNDP
2001
211
2080
80
80
80
1960~20003
1960 ~ 2000
212
HDEG1960 ~ 2000
UNDP
1990
23
20
801999
1960~2000
AB
10
3/4
10
A1960~2000a,b
c1970~1980
a 1970~1980
70
10%
5%
UNDP
B1960~2000
a,b,c
a 1970~1980
70
10%
1%
213
214
4%19902%
40
1980
20
38%199019%
19303/4Thorp1998
20602070Salvador Allende
2060
Raczynski1987
20%95%6~14
19777%19845%
81%Raczynski
1987
19727.3%
1.6%
19891.7%
Augusto Pinochet
Augusto Pinochet1973
20606%20
Augusto Pinochet
8016%
20600.47
11
1990
1978~19820.51 1986
2090
4.5%208070
2.1%1.2%
2060
1990~1999
2090
1975
11Riveros1998Berryed.199816
1969~1978
195020%
215
40%Thorp19981948
2070
2080
2060
1988
70
30%
7%3%
2060~70
5%~6%
196076%198145%
0.5~0.6
6%
Maddison1992
2/320~2420%
20
2060
60
8198010
2070
13% 1999
18%5%
4.5%
2060
2060
1960~1980
3%905%
5966
2060
7.4%5.3%66%
671980731995~2000
83%106%
7660
120%23%49%
19606.8%1970
5%14%
6.2%19801.9%1999
1.2%
2080
2080
1983~19886%
5%
40%198042%
198636%80
30%Friedmann
Lustig Legovini19951983~1988
20601/3
1960~1999
2080
NAFTA
2090
19941998
6769
7577
901.25%(80
Thorp1998
)90
1970Luis Echeverra
1989~1993
216
90%79%
3.2%5.4%
2090
PRONASOL
90-0.6%
80+0.3%90
Solidaridad
9075
90
86%98%
1995
90%2%
PRONOSOL
2060
206070
90
8090
196060
9.9%1966
206070
1970~1975
6%
60%
19605.6%
40%2070
197512.2%6065%
80%
85%1558
19706886%
1975~1983
Thorp1998
70
0.7%
80
2070
80
80
3.9%28%
1980~198630%1984
19886.4%
3.7%
2090
2080
1986~1990
4.2%
2.4%
90
6470
1995
5.7%
217
3.1%1990
90
9%
198059196047
8%
94% 196066%
Anastasio Somoza2060
1984~1990
8040%
90
199070
1960
4.1%
47Thorp1998
20
60%
70
2070
6.3%1989
65%6
7.2%
22%3/4
2090
10%1965~19755
1990 ~1999
1979
0.3%
25%
198019815%
50%
23%
1960~2000
Berry1998
AB
1960
218
20
80
90
80
20
2060
1975~1990
2090
21
2080
219
221
CEPAL REVIEW 9420084
1990~2005
1990
Simone Cecchini
simone.cecchini@cepal.org
Andras.Uthoff
andras.uthoff@cepal.org
222
1990~2005
25
1990~201515
1.B
20062008
2003
Sen1985
ECLAC
200637%1.74
13%7100
32005a
199048%
1522.5%9
2007d
15
1990
1
16
KakwaniNeriSon 2006Nez
2007dbox I.1
RamrezCuesta2006
1990~2005
223
1.
80%
2007a
2007c
16%7%Weller2006
2.
2007c
GDP
Islam2004Osmani
2002
2003
20078%20060.6
2007b2007
2003~2007
1990
2007d
1700
2007b
200548.5%
2006
4
5
2006
1990~2005
224
18
2005a,b
E/WAP
Arriagada2004
2007a
200537%
2005b
20%
61%
1/5
76%
4.2~6.2
80%2
2.1~4
Sunkel2006
1990~2005
225
2 182005a
a
2008
YL/E
YNL/N
(1)
Y/N
1990~2005
226
WAPN
EAPWAP
EAPE/EAP=1-
(2)
Navarrete20058
1990~2005
(3)
UthoffVeraRuedi
2006
2006
8
9KakwaniNeriSon2006 1995~2004
1990~2005
227
11
10
209016
53
12
1990
2.
1.
1990
2005
10
11
2006
2005b
1990~2005
228
16a
1989/1995~2001/2005
1990~2005
229
* <1.02001~2005
3Y/NYL/EY/NE/N
Y/NYNL/N
VAP=[((PF-PI)/PI)*100]/AVAP
PFPIA
19891020027
1990~2005
230
16
1989/1995~2001/2005
a
19891020027
1/3
12
123
2005
70%
1990~2005
1~10,1990~2005a
a 19902005
1990~2005
231
232
11%
81%1990~2005
3.
10%54%
2007a
16a1990~2005b
19902005
1997
1990~2005
233
2010
13
2015
2020
2090
13
(Mason Lee2004)
1990~2005
234
1990~2005
235
CEPAL REVIEW 10120108
GDP
TFP
1980~2004Malmquist
Daniel Sotelsek
daniel.sotelsek@uah.es
Leopoldo Laborda
leopoldo.laborda@uah.es
236
1980~2004
DEA
1980~2004
25
1.
Solow1957
Abramovitz1986Baumol1986
Maddison1987
Solow
Barro1991BarroSala-i-Martin
1992MankiwRomerWeil1992
Quah
Romer1986
1993 1
Elas20011960
19947
UCSD
CILAS
IDBJos Luis
1tYit
Machinea
BarroSala-I-Martin1992
237
40
0.5%
1980~2000Hofman
2001
0.3%
20
0.7%
TaskimZaim199723
19751990
0.37%0.38%
40%
OECD
Hofman
DowrickNguyen1989FreGrosskopf
200112
Norris1994
1980~2000
Ching-ChenYir-Hueih1999
SolimanoSoto2005
APEC19
1980
2080
GDP
MaudosSerranoPastor
Solimano
1999 Fre
Soto200535~36
GrosskopfNorris1994
2.
Lanteri2002
1970~2001
2200817~51
238
2070
Silent
411971~1992
SpringCarlson1962
Boulding1966
Meadows1972
FreGrosskopfHernndez-Sancho2004
349
Elkins1993271
Kuznets
171990
Cole2007
2080Brundtland
CommissionWCED1987
3
WCED1987
Ball2005
2090
Denison1979
Grossman
Robinson1995
Krueger1995Shafik1994
MCP
ColeElliot
Shimamoto2005 Stern2004
FreGrosskopfPasurka2007
Ball2005382~386
Kumar2006
3
Markandya
1992
4Cole2007245
239
1985~1995
Schuschny2007
CO2NOX
Fre
GrosskopfPasurka2007680
Schuschny2007
37
1.
Fre
1994
Fisher1992Caves
ChristensenDiewert1982
tst
(3)
(1)
(4)
(2)
12d0s(qt ,xt)t
s1m0
st
1
FreGrosskopfRoos1998
st
Farrell4
240
Schuschny200722~23
xtxs
FreGrosskopfRoos1994
2.
64
7
Birchenal
Murcia1997
1t
(5)
t+st
t+s
(6)
12
31
6
t
s
4tt+s
8Schuschny2007
241
1980~2004
2000
10
11
I18
2000
10
11
1980~2004
TFP
EFFCH
TECHCH
PECH
SECH
TFPCH
WDIGDF
242
1.
1981~19821982~1983
1980~2004
10%
12
1981~19821986~1987
7%
121
20
1980~2004
TFP
EFFCH
TECHCH
PECH
SECH
TFPCH
243
901996~1997
1998~1999
0.9720.993
2.
2.3%
19891994
1994
1995
2.8%
2002
0.7%
2090
2080
1.015
1.0061.023
244
1983~19871989~1992
19871992
1994~1998
19985
1980~2004
1980~2004
1980~2004
a 95%
245
246
13
1992~2004
Quah19931997
LucyAykroyd
Pollard2002
1980~19921992~20041980~2004
1992~2004
3.
tt+s
18
IIIII
t+s
1980~200425
14
t+s=1
Wilcoxon15
13Quah1997
14BirchenalMurcia1997
t-t+s45
45
15nxi , yi
WW
H0
247
P rietoZof o
1996
1980~2004
EESI
(7)
EA
GNP
EN
IV
1982198420022
1980~2004
248
CEPAL REVIEW 10120108
1980~2004
II
249
III 1980~2004
250
CEPAL REVIEW 10120108
1980~2004
IV
251
252
Kim, J.I. and L.J. Lau (1996), The sources of Asian Pacific
economic growth, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 29,
Quebec, Canadian Economics Association.
Krugman, P. (1994), The myth of Asias miracle, Foreign Affairs,
vol. 73, No. 6, New York, Council on Foreign Relations.
Kumar, S. (2006), Environmentally sensitive productivity growth:
a global analysis using Malmquist-Luenberger index,
Ecological Economics, vol. 56, No. 2, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
Lanteri, L.N. (2002), Productividad, desarrollo tecnolgico y
eficiencia. La propuesta de los ndices Malmquist, Anales de
la Asociacin Argentina de Economa Poltica, XXXVII Annual
Meeting, Tucumn, Argentina [online] www.aaep.org.ar
Lucy, D., R.G. Aykroyd and A.M. Pollard (2002), Nonparametric
calibration for age estimation, Applied Statistics, vol. 51,
No. 2, London, Royal Statistical Society.
Maddison, A. (1987), Growth and slowdown in advanced capitalist
economies: techniques of quantitative assessment, Journal
of Economic Literature, vol. 25, No. 2, Nashville, Tennessee,
American Economic Association.
Mankiw, N.G., D. Romer and D. Weil (1992), A contribution to the
empirics of economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics,
vol. 107, No. 2, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.
Markandya, A. (1992), Sustainable development: from concept to
action: the international economic framework, Cambridge,
Massachusetts, Harvard Institute for International
Development, unpublished.
Maudos, J., L. Serrano and J. Pastor (1999), Total factor
productivity measurement and human capital in OECD,
Economics Letters, vol. 63, No. 1, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
Meadows, D.H. and others (1972), The Limits to Growth, London,
Universe Books.
Prieto, A.M. and J.L. Zofo (1996), Modelizacin de los efectos
de la regulacin ambiental con fronteras tecnolgicas DEA,
Revista espaola de economa agraria, No. 175, Madrid,
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
Quah, D. (1997), Empirics for growth and distribution:
stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs, Journal
of Economic Growth, vol. 2, No. 1, New York, Springer.
(1996), Empirics for economic growth and convergence,
European Economic Review, vol. 40, No. 6, Amsterdam,
Elsevier.
(1993), Galtons fallacy and tests of the convergence
hypothesis, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 95,
253
255
CEPAL REVIEW
CEPAL Review1976
Ral Prebisch1001000
(ECLAC)
Andr Hofman
andre.hofman@cepal.org
Miguel Torres
miguel.torres@cepal.org
256
CEPAL REVIEW
60
the Caribbean
Economic Survey of
Caribbean
64 19481949
36
1948
1949Prebisch
Social
96
HofmanTorres2008
2008a5
21949
1951
3
12
Caribbean
Miguel Torres
CEPAL REVIEW
257
Prebisch-Gurrieri1976~1986
1976
4
1976 1956
2070
5
Peripheral Capitalism
6
Ral Prebisch197619864
Prebisch
Bielschowsky1998
2070
20
70
2080
Bielschowsky199823
2080
2070
Devlin1979
60
Devlin
2080
Ral Prebisch
Adolfo
Iglesias1983Massad1983
GurrieriRal Prebisch
Iglesias
Prebisch1984Five Stages
1982
in My Thinking on Development
41979
4812
6Ral Prebisch
Prebisch197619781979
1980
1974
Prebisch1981
258
CEPAL REVIEW
Massad1983Devlin1979
Torres Olivos2006
Fernando Fajnzylber
Fajnzylber
15
Fajnzylber1981
curtailed industrializationempty
boxFajnzylber19831990
Celso Furtado
1978
30
Furtado
Cardoso
1977
Furtado
CardosoPrebisch
Cardoso1977
11Prebisch-
Furtado1978
Criatividade
20
6Furtado1978
Cardoso19777
Cardoso
Rodrguez2006
Prebisch
Cardoso
Medina Echavarra
CEPAL REVIEW
259
Echavarra
Graciarena
1976Wolfe1976
Medina Echavarra1976
Medina Echavarra1977
Wolfe
America
--
2070
Pinto
1976Pinto
Osvaldo Sunkel
Sunkel1980
Pinto
structural heterogeneityPinto1970
Sunkel
Sunkel198017
Pinto-Lahera1987~1995
19871233
Anbal Pinto
Pensamiento
Bielschowsky1998
Iberoamericano112080
2090
71986428PrebischGurrieri
29~33
260
CEPAL REVIEW
Rosenthal
Fajnzylber19831990
Rosenthal1988
2080
2090
Fajnzylber1988
Lahera1988Willmore1989
Gonzlez
HofmanBuitelaar1994
1988
Eyzaguirre1989
Kuwayama1989
Peres19931994Rosales1994
Mortimore1989
Devlin1989
Fuentes1994
Rosenthal1993
IMF
20
Meller1989
Ramos
1989
Fajnzylber1991
Lahera1990
Enzo Faletto
Faletto19881989
Graciarena1988
Wolfe 19902090
8Lpez Cordovez1987Harker1987Ortega
1988Schejtman1988Dirven1993
209021Caldern
CEPAL REVIEW
261
HopenhaynOttone1994
Jovel1989
BustamanteTorres1990
2090
Gligo1990Durn de la Fuente
1991Valenzuela
(Pigovian taxes)Tomic1992
Dourojeanni1994
Snchez Albavera19931995
2090
20
208090
Fernando Fajnzylber
Altimir19901994FeresLen1990
Wolfe1991
Durston1988
20
Franco1989Sojo1990Rodrguez Noboa
1991CohenFranco1992Hopenhayn
1992
Krawczyk 19901993LpezPollack
1989Arriagada19901994Almeras
1994Durston19921993
Ffrench-Davis1988
Tokman1988Guerguil1988Infante
Klein1991Caldern1993Rosenbluth
Sunkel1989
1994
Sunkel
Uthoff1995
Zuleta1990
2090
Uthoff
Anbal Pinto
20Sunkel
1989
1991
262
CEPAL REVIEW
19959Pinto
Pinto
Pinto
Pinto
Altimir-Bajraj1996~20088
Pinto
Gert Rosenthal1996458
Eugenio Lahera
19981050
Oscar Altimir
75Ral Prebisch2002
20088
Ral Prebisch
20051995~2004
2003
Reynaldo BajrajAltimir
199850
Altimir Bajraj
1030
Bielschowsky1998
Katz1998
200712
Thomson ISI
SSCI
BouzasFfrench-Davis1998
9Oscar Altimir20
2090
60
Assael1998
1976~1983/
1984~1988
1989~19931994~1996
Sunkel1998
Reynaldo Bajraj1976
ILPES
Urquidi1998
1987
BajrajCELADE
1997~2003
2050
2001
CEPAL REVIEW
263
Ral Prebisch
100Ral Prebisch
75100
Ral Prebisch
Revista de la CEPAL
PollockKernerLove2001
10
PrebischOcampo2001
Prebisch
Rodrguez
Kervran2005
2001OConnell2001Gurrieri2001
PrebischCorts
Deluchey2005
Conde2001Prebisch
10
Dosman2001 Gonzlez2001
Prebisch
Prebisch
Ocampo 1999
Alexander HamiltonFrederick
Ocampo
Prebisch
20018Prebisch
Celso Furtado
Klein Tokman2000
2002
Joseph Stiglitz
Stiglitz2003
Escaith2001
Cardoso2004
Ricpero 2004Prebisch
Katz2000
Rodrik2005
1970~1996
Iglesias2006
Prez2001
Halperin2008
2007Ral
Prebisch
2005
Stallings
1995~2004
Weller2001
2090
264
CEPAL REVIEW
Fernando Fajnzylber
Paunovic2005
Jimnez
Tromben20062003~2007
10
TedescoLpez2002
Ocampo2007
AldunateMartner
2006
Hopenhayn2001
Sojo2001
OcampoParra
SchkolnikChackiel2004
2003
Sarav20042001
Prebisch Singer
2050Prebisch
Dirven2004
2090rnfe
OcampoParra24
19201980
Rodrguez2005
1%
Villatoro2005
Heymann2000
Martner
2000Morley2000
2090
Moguillansky20022090
Vergara2005
Ibarra
2004
gmm
Machinea Titelman2007
Carlson2002
CEPAL REVIEW
265
12
JimnezCuadros2003
Uthoff2002
2006
2002
2006
TitelmanUthoff2003
Weller2007
Titelman1999
Mesa-Lago19962004
20
90
2009~2012
20087Alicia Brcena Ibarra
10
2008
Osvaldo Sunkel
2009
Andr Hofman
20
Miguel Torres
30
11
10
11www.cepal.org/revista/default.asp?idioma=IN
266
CEPAL REVIEW
Snchez2009
Daz de Sarralde2010
Boamah2011
Bolaky2011
MounseyPolius2011
20094
972007
Ocampo2009
Ffrench-Davis2009
Machinea
Brcena2010
2009
Rosenthal2010
21
2008Kacef
Lpez-Monti201021
2008
Galindo
Samaniego2010
Agosin2009
Sotelsek
Rosales2009
Laborda2010
InfanteSunkel
Lpez2010
2009
Altomonte
2011
lvarez2009
Jenkins2011
Corts
Sinisterra2009
AltimirBajraj
Alarco2011
Ral PrebischFerrer
Tello2012
2010Ocampo2011
GDP
Prebisch
Monterroso-Rivas2009
Daz2009
CEPAL REVIEW
267
20052010
4100
2005~2009
122005
2010a
50
2010bAlicia Brcena
2005~200914
268
CEPAL REVIEW
CEPAL REVIEW
269
270
CEPAL REVIEW
CEPAL REVIEW
271
272
CEPAL REVIEW
CEPAL REVIEW
201211
273