You are on page 1of 23

Chapter 16 Test Bank

DISSOLUTION AND LIQUIDATION OF A PARTNERSHIP


Multiple Choice Questions

LO1
1.

Which statement is correct in describing the rank order of


payments as specified by the Uniform Partnership Act?
a. Payments to partners with loans to the partnership are
ranked equally with payments to other creditors.
b. Payments to partners with loans to the partnership are
ranked ahead of payments to partners without loans to the
partnership.
c. Payments to other creditors are ranked ahead of payments to
partners with loans to the partnership.
d. After payments are made to other creditors and partners
with loans to the partnership, payment can be made to
partners with capital interests.

LO1
2.

Which of the following procedures is acceptable when accounting


for a deficit balance in a partners capital account during
partnership liquidation?
a. A partner with a negative capital balance must contribute
personal assets to the partnership that are sufficient to
bring the capital account to zero.
b. If a partner with a negative capital balance is personally
insolvent, the negative capital balance may be absorbed by
those partners having a positive capital balance according
to the residual profit and loss sharing ratios that apply
to all the partners.
c. If a partner with a negative capital balance is personally
insolvent, the negative capital balance may be absorbed by
those partners having a positive capital balance according
to the residual profit and loss sharing ratios that apply
to those partners having positive balances.
d. All the above procedures are acceptable.

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-1

LO1
3.

A partnership dissolution differs from a liquidation in that


a. payments are made to creditors before partners receive
value.
b. periodic payments to partners are made when cash becomes
available.
c. a partner withdraws from the business and the enterprise
continues to function.
d. full payment is made to all outside creditors before
remaining cash is distributed to partners in a final lump
sum payment.

LO1
4.

A partnership in liquidation has converted all assets into cash


and paid all liabilities. According to the Uniform Partnership
Act, the order of payment
a. will have amounts due to partners with respect to their
capital accounts take precedence over amounts owed by
partners other than for capital and profits.
b. will be according to the partners residual profit and loss
sharing ratios.
c. will have amounts owed by partners other than for capital
and profits take precedence over amounts due to partners
with respect to their capital accounts.
d. Will be by any manner that is both reasonable and rational
for the partnership.

LO1
5.

In partnership liquidation, how are partner salary allocations


treated?
a. Salary allocations take precedence over creditor payments.
b. Salary allocations take precedence over amounts due to
partners with respect to their capital interests, but not
profits.
c. Salary allocations take precedence over amounts due to
partners with respect to their capital profits, but not
capital interests.
d. Salary allocations are disregarded.

LO1
6.

A simple partnership liquidation requires


a. periodic payments to creditors and partners determined by a
safe payments schedule.
b. partnership assets to be converted into cash with full
payment made to all outside creditors before remaining cash
is distributed to partners in a lump sum payment.
c. only creditors to be paid in an orderly manner.
d. periodic payments to partners as cash becomes available.
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
16-2

LO2
7.

In a simple partnership liquidation, the last remaining cash


distribution should be made according to the ratio of
a. the individual partners profit and loss agreement.
b. the individual partner's capital accounts, increased by
partner loans to the partnership.
c. the individual partners capital accounts, increased by
partnership loans to the partners and decreased by partner
loans to the partnership.
d. the individual partners capital accounts, decreased by
partnership loans to the partners and increased by partner
loans to the partnership.

LO2
8.

If conditions produce a debit balance in a partners capital


account when liquidation losses are allocated
a. the partner receives further allocations of liquidation
losses, but not gains.
b. the partner receives no further allocation of liquidation
losses and gains.
c. the partner is no longer obligated to partnership
creditors.
d. the partner has an obligation of personal net assets to the
other partners.

Use the following information for questions 9, 10 and 11.


On June 30, 2006, the Warle, Xin, and Yates partnership had the
following fiscal year-end balance sheet:
Cash
Accounts receivable
Inventory
Plant assets-net
Loan to Warle
Total assets

4,000
6,000
14,000
12,000
6,000
42,000

Accounts payable
Loan from Xin
Warle, capital(20%)
Xin, capital(30%)
Yates, capital(50%)
Total liab./equity

7,000
5,000
14,000
10,000
6,000
42,000

The percentages shown are the residual profit and loss sharing
ratios. The partners dissolved the partnership on July 1, 2006,. and
began the liquidation process. During July the following events
occurred:
* Receivables of $3,000 were collected.
* The inventory was sold for $4,000.
* All available cash was distributed on
July 31, except for $2,000 that was
set aside for contingent expenses.
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
16-3

LO2
9.

The book value of the partnership equity (i.e., total equity of


the partners) on June 30, 2006 is
a.
b.
c.
d.

LO2
10.

The cash available for distribution to the partners on July 31,


2006 is
a.
b.
c.
d.

LO2
11.

$ 2,000.
$ 4,000.
$ 7,000.
$11,000.

How much cash would Xin receive from the cash that is available
for distribution on July 31?
a.
b.
c.
d.

LO2
12.

$60,000.
$29,000.
$30,000.
$42,000.

$
0.
$ 600.
$1,000.
$2,000.

Hara, Ives, and Jack are in the process of liquidating their


partnership. Since it may take several months to convert the
other assets into cash, the partners agree to distribute all
available cash immediately, except for $10,000 that is set
aside for contingent expenses. The balance sheet and residual
profit and loss sharing percentages are as follows:

Cash
Other assets

400,000
200,000

Accounts payable
Hara, capital (40%)
Ives, capital (30%)
Jack, capital (30%)

200,000
135,000
216,000
49,000

Total assets

600,000

Total liab./equity

600,000

How much cash should Ives receive in the first distribution?


a.
b.
c.
d.

$146,000.
$147,000.
$153,000.
$156,000
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
16-4

LO2
13.

Jade, Kahl, and Lane are in the process of liquidating their


partnership. Lane has agreed to accept the inventory, which has
a fair value of $60,000, as part of her settlement. A balance
sheet and the residual profit and loss sharing percentages are
as follows:

Cash
Inventory
Plant assets

198,000
80,000
230,000

Accounts payable
Jade, capital (40%)
Kahl, capital (40%)
Lane, capital (20%)

149,000
79,000
140,000
140,000

Total assets

508,000

Total liab./equity

508,000

If the partners then distribute the available cash, Lane will


receive
a.
b.
c.
d.
LO2
14.

$23,000.
$29,000
$30,000.
$34,000.

Under the rule of offset, what is the proper disposition of a


partnership loan that was made from a partner who has a debit
balance?
a. The loan is first paid to the debtor partner before cash
payments are made to partners.
b. The loan is written off as a partnership loss if the
partner does not have the cash to cover the debit balance.
c. The loan is charged off to the capital accounts of all the
partners in their profit and loss sharing ratios.
d. The loan is charged off to the capital account of the
debtor partner.

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-5

LO3
15.

In partnership liquidations, what are safe payments?


a. The amounts of distributions that can be made to the
partners, after all creditors have been paid in full.
b. The amounts of distributions that can be made to the
partners with assurance that such amounts will not have to
be returned to the partnership.
c. The amounts of distributions that can be made to the
partners, after all non-cash assets have been adjusted to
fair market value.
d. All the above are examples of the safe payments concept.

LO4
16.

If all partners are included in the first installment of an


installment liquidation, then in future installments
a. cash will be distributed according to the residual profit
and loss sharing ratio.
b. cash should not be distributed until all non-cash assets
are converted into cash.
c. a safe payments schedule must be prepared before each cash
distribution to avoid excessive payments to partners.
d. a cash distribution plan must be prepared so that partners
will know when they will be included in cash distributions.

LO5
17.

The year-end balance sheet and residual profit and loss sharing
percentages for the Lang, Maas, and Neal partnership on
December 31, 2005, are as follows:

Cash
Loan to Lang
Other assets

30,000
40,000
480,000

Total assets

550,000

Accounts payable
Loan from Maas
Lang, capital (25%)
Maas, capital (25%)
Neal, capital (50%)
Total liab./equity

200,000
50,000
70,000
80,000
150,000
550,000

The partners agree to liquidate the business and distribute


cash when it becomes available. A cash distribution plan for
the Lang, Maas, and Neal partnership will show that cash
available, after outside creditors are paid, will initially go
to
a.
b.
c.
d.

Lang
Maas
Maas
Neal

in
in
in
in

the
the
the
the

amount
amount
amount
amount

of
of
of
of

$20,000.
$45,000.
$55,000.
$90,000.

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-6

LO5
18.

In a schedule of assumed loss absorptions


a.
b.
c.
d.

LO5
19.

the partner with lowest loss absorption is eliminated last.


it is necessary to have a cash distribution plan first.
the least vulnerable partner is eliminated first.
the most vulnerable partner is eliminated first.

Which partner is considered the most vulnerable as a result of


a computation of vulnerability rankings?
a. The partner with the lowest vulnerability ranking, who
has the lowest loss absorption potential.
b. The partner with the lowest vulnerability ranking, who
has the highest loss absorption potential.
c. The partner with the highest vulnerability ratio, who
has the lowest loss absorption potential.
d. The partner with the highest vulnerability ranking,
also has the highest loss absorption potential.

LO6
20.

The rank order is for claims against a bankrupt partner of


I. Those owing to partners by way of contribution
II.Those owing to separate creditors
III.Those owing to partnership creditors
a.
b.
c.
d.

II first; I second and III


III first; II second and I
I first; III second and II
II first; III second and I

third.
third.
third.
third.

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-7

also
also
also
who

LO2
Exercise 1
The balance sheet of the Alba, Blick, and Calvo partnership on
January 1, 2006 (the date of partnership dissolution) was as follows:
Cash
Other assets
Loan to Calvo

2,000
13,000
1,000

Total assets

16,000

Liabilities
Loan from Alba
Alba, capital (20%)
Blick, capital(40%)
Calvo, capital(40%)
Total liab./equity

4,010
500
990
4,500
6,000
16,000

In January, other assets with a book value of $8,000 were sold for
$5,000 in cash.
Required:
Determine how
distributed.

the

available

cash

on

January

31,

2006

will

be

LO2
Exercise 2
The partnership of Dale, Edgar, and Fred was dissolved, and by July
1, 2006, all assets had been converted into cash and all partnership
liabilities were paid. The partnership balance sheet on July 1, 2006
(with partner residual profit and loss sharing percentages) was as
follows:
Cash

10,000

Fred, capital(30%)
Dale, capital(40%)
Edgar, capital(30%)

40,000
(20,000)
(10,000)

Total assets

10,000

Total equity

10,000

The value of partners' personal assets and liabilities on July 1,


2006 were as follows:

Personal assets
Personal liabilities

Dale
45,000 $
30,000

Edgar
30,000 $
20,000

Fred
25,000
10,000

Required:
Prepare the final statement of partnership liquidation.
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
16-8

LO2
Exercise 3
The balance sheet of the Omar, Paolo, and Quek partnership on
November 1, 2006 (before commencement of partnership liquidation) was
as follows:
Cash
Inventory
Loan to Omar
Loan to Quek
Plant assets-net

58,000
60,000
8,000
14,000
70,000

Total assets

210,000

Accounts payable
Notes payable
Omar, capital(40%)
Paolo, capital(25%)
Quek, capital (35%)

34,000
62,000
24,000
26,000
64,000

Total liab./equity

210,000

Liquidation events in November were as follows:


- The inventory was sold for $10,000 above book value;
- Plant assets with a book value of $60,000 were sold for $34,000.
Required:
Determine how
distributed.

the

available

cash

on

November

31,

2006

should

be

LO2
Exercise 4
A cash distribution plan for the Folger, Glover, and Hale partnership
was as follows:

First $250,000
Next $100,000
Next $150,000
Remainder

Priority
Creditors
100%

Folger

Glover

70%

30%

11/15
20%

35%

Hale

4/15
45%

Required:
If $850,000 of cash was distributed by the partnership, how much was
received respectively by the priority creditors, Folger, Glover, and
Hale?

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-9

LO2
Exercise 5
The balance sheet of the Jody, Kane, and Lark partnership on May 1,
2006 (before commencement of partnership liquidation) was as follows:
Cash
Inventory
Loan to Jody
Loan to Lark
Plant assets-net

54,000
60,000
10,000
16,000
110,000

Accounts payable
Notes payable
Jody, capital (30%)
Kane, capital (45%)
Lark, capital (25%)

28,000
60,000
32,000
90,000
40,000

Total assets

250,000

Total liab./equity

250,000

Liquidation events in May were as follows:


- The inventory was sold for $6,000 below book value;
- Plant assets with a book value of $50,000 were sold for $60,000.
Required:
Determine how the available cash on April 30, 2006 should be distributed.
LO2
Exercise 6
The balance sheet of the Nebe, Oak, and Pang partnership on October
1, 2006 (the date of partnership dissolution) was as follows:
Cash
Other assets
Loan to Oak

3,000
33,000
4,000

Total assets

40,000

Liabilities
Loan from Nebe
Nebe, capital (20%)
Oak, capital (30%)
Pang, capital (50%)
Total liab./equity

9,000
1,000
3,000
6,000
21,000
40,000

In October, other assets with a book value of $15,000 were sold for
$17,000 in cash.
Required:
Determine how
distributed.

the

available

cash

on

October

31,

2006

will

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-10

be

LO2
Exercise 7
The partnership of Hanly, Ide, and Jen was dissolved. By August 1,
2006, all assets had been converted into cash and all partnership
liabilities were paid. The partnership balance sheet on August 1,
2006 (with partner residual profit and loss sharing percentages) was
as follows:
Cash

50,000

Hanly, capital(30%)
Ide, capital(20%)
Jen, capital(50%)

4,000
(60,000)
106,000

Total assets

50,000

Total equity

50,000

The value of partners' personal assets and liabilities on August 1,


2006 were as follows:

Personal assets
Personal liabilities

Hanly
74,000 $
72,000

Ide
120,000 $
80,000

Required:
Prepare the final statement of partnership liquidation.

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-11

Jen
56,000
60,000

LO5
Exercise 8
Luis, Mac, Nel, and Oma are partners who share profits and losses
40%, 25%, 25%, and 10%, respectively. The partnership will be
liquidated gradually over several months beginning January 1, 2006.
The partnership trial balance at December 31, 2005 is as follows:
Cash
Accounts receivable
Inventory
Loan to Nel
Furniture
Equipment
Goodwill
Accounts payable
Note payable
Loan from Luis
Luis, capital (40%)
Mac, capital (25%)
Nel, capital (25%)
Oma, capital (10%)
Totals

Debits
3,000
19,000
25,000
5,000
15,000
10,000
12,000

Credits

89,000 $

14,000
30,000
5,000
15,000
9,000
12,000
4,000
89,000

Required:
Prepare a cash distribution plan for January 1, 2006, showing how
cash installments will be distributed among the partners as it
becomes available.

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-12

LO5
Exercise 9
Quan, Ray, Sen, and Tad are partners who share profits and losses 30%, 20%,
35%, and 15%, respectively. The partnership will be liquidated gradually
over several months beginning January 1, 2006. The partnership trial
balance at December 31, 2005 is as follows:
Cash
Accounts receivable
Inventory
Loan to Ray
Furniture
Equipment
Goodwill
Accounts payable
Note payable
Loan from Sen
Quan, capital (30%)
Ray, capital (20%)
Sen, capital (35%)
Tad, capital (15%)
Totals

Debits
3,000
10,000
25,000
4,000
15,000
18,000
10,000

Credits

12,000
30,000
6,000
12,000
9,000
12,000
4,000
85,000

85,000 $

Required:
Prepare a cash distribution plan for January 1, 2006, showing how
cash installments will be distributed among the partners as it
becomes available.
LO5
Exercise 10
A cash distribution plan
partnership was as follows:

First $100,000
Next $180,000
Next $270,000
Remainder

Priority
Creditors
100%

for

the

Upton,

Valenta,

and

Walker

Upton

Valenta

Walker

44%
2/9
11%

10%
1/9
44%

46%
2/3
45%

Required:
If $700,000 of cash was distributed by the partnership, how much was
received respectively by the priority creditors, Upton, Valenta, and
Walker?
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
16-13

SOLUTIONS
Multiple Choice Questions
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

($14,000 Warle capital + $10,000 Xin capital +


$6,000 Yates capital + $5,000 Loan from Xin $6,000 Loan to Warle)

10.

($4,000 beginning balance + $3,000 cash collected +


$4,000 for inventory sold - $7,000 of accounts payable
- $2,000 for expenses)

11.

Equities,Jun 30
Inventory loss
Contingency fund
Subtotals
Possible losses on
remaining assets
Subtotals

Xin
15,000
3,000 )
600 )
11,400

$
(
(

Yates
6,000
$
5,000 ) (
1,000 ) (
0

Total
29,000
10,000 )
2,000 )
17,000
15,000 )
2,000

3,000 ) (
2,600
$

4,500 ) (
6,900
$(

7,500 ) (
7,500 ) $

(
(

3,000 ) (
400 )

4,500 )
2,400

7,500
0

Eliminate Yatess
Deficit
Subtotals
Eliminate Warles
Deficit
Cash distribution

(
(

Warle
8,000
$
2,000 ) (
400 ) (
5,600

400
0

(
$

400 )
2,000

2,000

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-14

2,000

12.

b
Losses

Equities
Possible loss on
remaining assets
Contingencies
Subtotals

40%
Hara
135,000

$
200,000
10,000

(
(
$

80,000 ) (
4,000 ) (
51,000
$

60,000 ) (
3,000 ) (
153,000
$(

Eliminate Jacks
debit balance

8,000 ) (

6,000 )

Safe payments

13.

30%
Ives
216,000

43,000

147,000

30%
Jack
49,000
60,000 )
3,000 )
14,000 )
14,000

Equities
Distribute inventory to
Lane and:
recognize $20,000 loss
Possible losses on plant
Subtotal
Eliminate Jades debit
balance to Kahl & Lane
Balance

14.

15.

16.

$
(
(
$(
$

40%
Jade
79,000

$
(

20%
Lane
140,000
60,000 )

8,000 ) (
92,000 ) (
21,000 ) $

8,000 ) (
92,000 ) (
40,000
$

4,000 )
46,000 )
30,000

21,000
0

14,000 ) (
26,000
$

7,000 )
23,000

(
$

40%
Kahl
140,000

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-15

17.

Vulnerability ranks:
Lang equity ($70,000 - $40,000)/.25 = $120,000
Maas equity ($80,000 + $50,0000/.25 = $520,000
Neal equity ($150,000/.5)
= $300,000
Assumed loss absorption:
Equities
Loss to eliminate
Lang
Subtotals
Loss to eliminate
Neal
Subtotals

18.

19.

20.

$
(

25%
Lang
30,000

25%
Maas
130,000

= 1
= 3
= 2
50%
Neal
150,000

Total
310,000

30,000 ) (
0
$

30,000 ) (
100,000
$

60,000 ) (
90,000
$

120,000 )
190,000

(
$

45,000 ) (
55,000
$

90,000 ) (
0
$

135,000 )
55,000

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-16

Exercise 1
Alba, Blick, and Calvo Partnership
Partnership Liquidation Schedule
NonFirst
20%
40%
40%
Cash
Rank
Alba
Blick
Calvo
Assets
Debt
Equity
Equity
Equity
2,000 $ 13,000 $ 4,010 $
1,490 $
4,500 $ 5,000
5,000 ( 8,000)
(
600) ( 1,200) ( 1,200)
7,000 $ 5,000 $ 4,010 $
890 $ 3,300 $ 3,800

Cash
Jan 1 Balance
Sale of assets
Subtotal

$
$

Safe Payments Schedule

Partners pre-distribution balances


Possible losses on non-cash assets
Write off Alba 50-50
Cash distribution to partners

$
(
(
$

Alba
Blick
Calvo
Equity
Equity
Equity
890 $
3,300 $
3,800
1,000)(
2,000)(
2,000)
110)
1,300
1,800
110 (
55)(
55)
0 $
1,245 $ 1,745

Cash distribution plan on January 31:


First $4,010 goes to priority creditors, and then Blick receives
$1,245 and Calvo receives $1,745.

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-17

Exercise 2
Dale, Edgar, and Fred Partnership
Final Statement of Partnership Liquidation
Dale
Edgar
Fred
Cash
Capital
Capital
Capital
Total
10,000 $(
20,000) $(
10,000) $
40,000 $ 10,000

Balance, July 1 $
Dales
personal
contribution

15,000
25,000

25,000

Write-off Dale
Edgars personal
contribution
Write-off Edgar
Distribute cash

(
$

15,000
5,000) (
5,000 (
0 (

10,000
35,000

35,000

10,000)
2,500) (
12,500)

40,000
2,500)
37,500

10,000
2,500)
2,500 (
0

37,500
2,500)
35,000

35,000)
0

(
$

15,000
25,000
25,000
10,000
35,000
35,000

35,000) ( 35,000)
0 $
0

Exercise 3
Omar, Paolo, and Quek
Schedule of Partnership Liquidation
November 30, 2006
Assets
$
210,000 $
10,000
(
26,000)

Debts
96,000

194,000
22,000)
96,000) (
76,000

96,000

Balance, Nov. 1
Inventory sold
Sale of plant
Balances before
distribution
Offset loans
(
Pay creditors
(
Partner equity
$
Possible loss:
Plant assets
(
Distribution
$

10,000)
66,000

96,000)

40%
Omar
24,000 $
4,000
10,400) (

17,600
8,000)

9,600

(
$

4,000 )
5,600

25%
35%
Paolo
Quek
26,000 $ 64,000
2,500
3,500
6,500) ( 9,100)
22,000

58,400
( 14,000)

22,000

$ 44,400

(
$

2,500 )
19,500

(
3,500)
$ 40,900

(Cash Distribution: $58,000 + $70,000 + $34,000 - $96,000 = $66,000)


Nov. 1 Inventory
Plant
Creditors Nov. 30
2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
16-18

Exercise 4

First $250,000
Next $100,000
Next $150,000
Last $350,000
Total $850,000

Priority
Creditors
250,000

Folger
$

250,000 $

Glover

70,000 $
110,000
70,000
250,000 $

Hale

30,000
$
122,500
152,500 $

40,000
157,500
197,500

Exercise 5
Jody, Kane, and Lark
Schedule of Partnership Liquidation
May 30, 2006
Assets
$
250,000 $
10,000
(
6,000)

Balance, May 1
Plant sold
Inventory sold
Balances before
distribution
Offset loans
(
Pay creditors
(
Partner equity $
Possible loss:
Plant assets
(
Distribution
$

254,000
26,000)
88,000)(
140,000
60,000)
80,000

30%
Jody
32,000 $
3,000
1,800) (

45%
25%
Kane
Lark
90,000 $ 40,000
4,500
2,500
2,700) ( 1,500)

33,200
10,000)

91,800

41,000
( 16,000)

91,800

$ 25,000

Debts
88,000 $

88,000

88,000)
$
(
$

23,200

18,000) (
5,200 $

27,000) ( 15,000)
64,800 $ 10,000

(Cash Distribution: $54,000 + $54,000 + $60,000 - $88,000 = $80,000)


May 1 Inventory
Plant Creditors May 30

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-19

Exercise 6
Nebe, Oak, and Pang Partnership
Partnership Liquidation Schedule
NonFirst
30%
20%
50%
Cash
Rank
Oak
Nebe
Pang
Assets
Debt
Equity
Equity
Equity
Jan 1 Balance $ 3,000 $ 33,000 $ 9,000 $ 2,000 $ 4,000 $ 21,000
Sale of assets
17,000 ( 15,000)
600
400
1,000
Subtotal
20,000
18,000
9,000
2,600
4,400
22,000
Cash

Safe Payments Schedule

Partners pre-distribution balances


Possible losses on non-cash assets
Write off Oak 2/7 and 5/7
Cash distribution to partners

$
(
(
$

Oak
Nebe
Equity
Equity
2,600 $
4,400
5,400)(
3,600)(
2,800)
800
2,800 (
800)(
0 $
0 $

Pang
Equity
22,000
9,000)
13,000
2,000)
11,000

Cash distribution plan on October 31:


First $9,000
$11,000.

goes

to

priority

creditors,

and

then

Pang

receives

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-20

Exercise 7
Hanly, Ide, and Jen Partnership
Final Statement of Partnership Liquidation
Ide
Hanly
Jen
Cash
Capital
Capital
Capital
Total
50,000 $(
60,000) $
4,000 $ 106,000 $ 50,000

Balance, Aug. 1 $
Ides
personal
contribution

40,000
90,000

Write-off Ide
90,000
Hanlys personal
contribution

40,000
( 20,000)
20,000 (
$
0 $(

2,000

(
$

92,000

92,000

92,000)
0

106,000
12,500)
93,500

2,000

Write-off Hanly
Distribute cash

4,000
7,500)(
3,500)

40,000
90,000
90,000
2,000

1,500)
1,500 (
0
(
$

93,500
1,500)
92,000

92,000
92,000

92,000) ( 92,000)
0 $
0

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-21

Exercise 8
Loss absorption potential:

Luis
Mac
Nel
Oma

Partners
Equity
$
20,000
9,000
7,000
4,000

Profit
and Loss
Ratio
40%
25%
25%
10%

$
$
$
$

Loss
Absorption
Potential
50,000
36,000
28,000
40,000

Vulnerability
Ranking
4
2
1
3

Schedule of assumed loss absorption:


40%
Luis
Partnership
equity
Assumed loss
to absorb Nel
Assumed loss
to absorb Mac
Assumed loss
to absorb Oma

20,000

25%
Mac
$

9,000

25%
Nel
$

( 11,200 ) (
8,800

7,000 ) (
2,000

3,200 ) (
5,600

2,000 )
0

(
$

1,600 )
4,000

7,000

10%
Oma
$

7,000 ) (
0

4,000

Total
$ 40,000

2,800 ) ( 28,000 )
1,200
12,000

800 ) (
400

6,000 )
6,000

(
$

400 ) (
0
$

2,000 )
4,000

Cash distribution plan:


First $44,000 pays the priority creditors;
Next $4,000 goes to Luis;
Next $2,000 goes $1,600 to Luis, and $400 to Oma;
Next $6,000 goes $3,200 to Luis, $2,000 to Mac, and $800 to Oma;
Remainder goes 40% to Luis, 25% to Mac, 25% to Nel, and 10% to Oma.

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-22

Exercise 9
Loss absorption potential:

Quan
Ray
Sen
Tad

Partners
Equity
12,000
5,000
18,000
4,000

Profit
and Loss
Ratio
30%
20%
35%
15%

$
$
$
$

Loss
Absorption
Potential
40,000
25,000
51,429
26,667

Vulnerability
Ranking
3
1
4
2

Schedule of assumed loss absorption:


30%
Quan
Partnership
equity
Assumed loss
- absorb Ray
Assumed loss
to absorb Tad
Assumed loss
to absorb Quan

15%
Tad

12,000

20%
Ray

4,000

7,500 ) (
4,500

3,750 ) (
250
$

500 ) (
4,000
$

250 )
0

(
$

4,000 )
0

35%
Sen

5,000

$ 18,000

5,000 ) (
0

Total
$ 39,000

8,750 ) ( 25,000 )
9,250
14,000

583 ) (
8,667

1,333 )
12,667

(
$

4,667 ) (
4,000
$

8,667 )
4,000

Cash distribution plan:


First $42,000 pays the priority creditors;
Next $4,000 goes to Sen;
Next $8,667 goes $4,667 to Sen, and $4,000 to Quan;
Next $1,333 goes $583 to Sen, $500 to Quan, and $250 to Tad;
Remainder goes 35% to Sen, 30% to Quan, 20% to Ray, and 15% to Tad.
Exercise 10

First
Next
Next
Last
Total

$100,000
$180,000
$270,000
$150,000
$700,000

Priority
Creditors
100,000

Upton
$

100,000 $

79,200 $
60,000
16,500
155,700 $

Valenta
18,000 $
30,000
66,000
114,000 $

Walker
82,800
180,000
67,500
330,300

2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall


16-23

You might also like