Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I want know why I think and believe the way I do. I not only think it's worthy of
my time to find answers to questions that plague me, it's also my own, personal
responsibility.
You don't want to blindly accept a second hand account of what somebody else
interprets to be truth, do you? Neither do I.
The other day, I learned that I have, for years, held an incomplete understanding
of the definition of the word "apocalypse". I always thought it meant something
along the lines of World War 3, etc...
a�poc�a�lypse
n.
1. revelation
2. any of a class of Jewish or Christian writings that appeared from about 200
b.c. to a.d. 350 and were assumed to make revelations of the ultimate divine
purpose.
3. a prophetic revelation, esp. concerning a cataclysm in which the forces of
good permanently triumph over the forces of evil.
4. any revelation or prophecy.
5. any universal or widespread destruction or disaster: the apocalypse of
nuclear war.
The third and fourth definitions surprised me. I asked around and found that
others had also carried a partial understanding of the word all their lives. Many
of us generally have images of destruction and colossal warfare upon hearing the
word.
I found this significant and interesting, because I spend a lot of time thinking
about how people interpret words.
I have watched, time and time again, as people argued and fought over their
interpretations of scriptural passages. I know for a fact, that I held steadfast
for years to passages and ideas handed down to me as a child, without ever taking
time to investigate the context and meanings for myself. I suspect that happens to
a lot of people.
To go even deeper, there are a lot of words in my vocabulary, which I have used
all my life, that I have always assumed I understood the definitions of. I have
also assumed that my interpretations of particular words were just the same as
other peoples'. To my surprise, almost nothing could be further fro the truth.
To me, the word love, at it's highest form, is demonstrated by a total condition
of selflessness. To act on behalf, and for, the well-being and happiness of
another, gladly, and without expectation of recompense.
Do we say "I love you" when we really mean "I want you" or "I desire you"?
Do we tell somebody we love them, and then turn around and speak poorly of them
behind their back?"
One time I had a job that required me to drive a lot. One morning while working, I
was listening to a Christian radio station, as I often did. The station played a
recording of a group of children singing, and the chorus of the song went "In all
I do, I honor you." I began thinking about the sentiment, which was directed
towards God, and thought that this was a pretty bold statement.
I'm not sure the children possessed enough life-experience or insight to ponder
the weight of the lyrics, and I'm sure it was intended to be an inspirational song
of worship, indeed, a cute one sung gleefully by youngsters, and maybe I take
things a little to seriously, but I think it's dangerous to make a claim as proud
as that.
For one thing, I couldn't bring myself to sing along, even in my head, for the
simple reason that I know everything I do does not bring honor to god. To make
such a claim would suggest that I am a saint, and anybody who knows me, can surely
attest otherwise.
So, when I tell someone I love them, do I really? Do I put their happiness and
well-being ahead of my own, at least part of the time? If the answer is no, then I
am, at best, merely repeating a shallow sentiment that might provide another with
an ephemeral and superficial feeling of being loved...and at worst, I am a liar.