Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Nuclear Transparency Watch (NTW) - Complaint EC Nuclear Export HU

    Uploaded by

    Michèle Rivasi
    270 views2 pages
    Nuclear Transparency Watch (NTW*) initiated in European Parliament on November 7th, 2013. 'Prevent and anticipate through transparency and participation' A European-wide network of civil society bodies has been created to ensure greater vigilance and public involvement in relation to all activities in the nuclear sector. The principal focus is on transparency as a means to guarantee safety and the protection of human health and the environment. The initiative has the support of MEPs across the political spectrum and is chaired by Michelle Rivasi, MEP. The countries participating in NTW through civil society organisations and elected representatives, including MEPs, are: Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Ukraine, Sweden and Slovenia. NTW has emerged from a five year process entitled 'ACN' (Aarhus Convention and Nuclear) initiated by ANCCLI*, the French federation of Local Commissions of Information. A series of national and European round tables was convened to examine and promote greater civil society participation in all aspects of nuclear power. The process was supported by DG Ener-EC**, the EESC*** and ENEF**** and took place in the context of the Aarhus Convention which is ratified by all participating countries and the EU. The Convention, hosted by the UNECE*****, guarantees the public's rights to information, participation and justice in environmental matters. The potential risks associated with nuclear accidents have transboundary implications so all countries have legitimate concerns whether they operate nuclear plants or not. The Fukushima accident has heightened the urgent need to ensure greater public scrutiny of all aspects of the nuclear life-cycle. Nuclear safety depends on many factors - political, economic and social. The degree to which the public participates in the monitoring of nuclear activities varies significantly across countries and in many instances is at a very restricted level. The objective of NTW is to enhance the levels of civil society vigilance and public participation in nuclear-related decision-making processes such as siting and extension decisions, waste management and emergency preparedness and response (EP&R). As a first step a working group has been established to address EP&R. Its task is to carry out an evaluation of the existing European and national EP&R provisions and to produce a report by mid-2014. This topic was not adequately addressed in the post-Fukushima stress tests. European convergence on the highest standards of nuclear safety is the goal that NTW has set for itself. List of acronyms: (* ) ANCCLI: French Federation of Local Commission of Information (**) DG Ener-EC: Directorate-General for Energy- European Commission (***) EESC: European Economic and Social Committee (****) ENEF: European Nuclear Energy Forum (*****) UNECE: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Nuclear Transparency Watch (NTW*) initiated in European Parliament on November 7th, 2013. 'Prevent and anticipate through transparency and participation' A European-wide network of civil society bodies has been created to ensure greater vigilance and public involvement in relation to all activities in the nuclear sector. The principal focus is on transparency as a means to guarantee safety and the protection of human health and the environment. The initiative has the support of MEPs across the political spectrum and is chaired by Michelle Rivasi, MEP. The countries participating in NTW through civil society organisations and elected representatives, including MEPs, are: Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Ukraine, Sweden and Slovenia. NTW has emerged from a five year process entitled 'ACN' (Aarhus Convention and Nuclear) initiated by ANCCLI*, the French federation of Local Commissions of Information. A series of national and European round tables was convened to examine and promote greater civil society participation in all aspects of nuclear power. The process was supported by DG Ener-EC**, the EESC*** and ENEF**** and took place in the context of the Aarhus Convention which is ratified by all participating countries and the EU. The Convention, hosted by the UNECE*****, guarantees the public's rights to information, participation and justice in environmental matters. The potential risks associated with nuclear accidents have transboundary implications so all countries have legitimate concerns whether they operate nuclear plants or not. The Fukushima accident has heightened the urgent need to ensure greater public scrutiny of all aspects of the nuclear life-cycle. Nuclear safety depends on many factors - political, economic and social. The degree to which the public participates in the monitoring of nuclear activities varies significantly across countries and in many instances is at a very restricted level. The objective of NTW is to enhance the levels of civil society vigilance and public participation in nuclear-related decision-making processes such as siting and extension decisions, waste management and emergency preparedness and response (EP&R). As a first step a working group has been established to address EP&R. Its task is to carry out an evaluation of the existing European and national EP&R provisions and to produce a report by mid-2014. This topic was not adequately addressed in the post-Fukushima stress tests. European convergence on the highest standards of nuclear safety is the goal that NTW has set for itself. List of acronyms: (* ) ANCCLI: French Federation of Local Commission of Information (**) DG Ener-EC: Directorate-General for Energy- European Commission (***) EESC: European Economic and Social Committee (****) ENEF: European Nuclear Energy Forum (*****) UNECE: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    270 views2 pages

    Nuclear Transparency Watch (NTW) - Complaint EC Nuclear Export HU

    Uploaded by

    Michèle Rivasi
    Nuclear Transparency Watch (NTW*) initiated in European Parliament on November 7th, 2013. 'Prevent and anticipate through transparency and participation' A European-wide network of civil society bodies has been created to ensure greater vigilance and public involvement in relation to all activities in the nuclear sector. The principal focus is on transparency as a means to guarantee safety and the protection of human health and the environment. The initiative has the support of MEPs across the political spectrum and is chaired by Michelle Rivasi, MEP. The countries participating in NTW through civil society organisations and elected representatives, including MEPs, are: Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg, Ukraine, Sweden and Slovenia. NTW has emerged from a five year process entitled 'ACN' (Aarhus Convention and Nuclear) initiated by ANCCLI*, the French federation of Local Commissions of Information. A series of national and European round tables was convened to examine and promote greater civil society participation in all aspects of nuclear power. The process was supported by DG Ener-EC**, the EESC*** and ENEF**** and took place in the context of the Aarhus Convention which is ratified by all participating countries and the EU. The Convention, hosted by the UNECE*****, guarantees the public's rights to information, participation and justice in environmental matters. The potential risks associated with nuclear accidents have transboundary implications so all countries have legitimate concerns whether they operate nuclear plants or not. The Fukushima accident has heightened the urgent need to ensure greater public scrutiny of all aspects of the nuclear life-cycle. Nuclear safety depends on many factors - political, economic and social. The degree to which the public participates in the monitoring of nuclear activities varies significantly across countries and in many instances is at a very restricted level. The objective of NTW is to enhance the levels of civil society vigilance and public participation in nuclear-related decision-making processes such as siting and extension decisions, waste management and emergency preparedness and response (EP&R). As a first step a working group has been established to address EP&R. Its task is to carry out an evaluation of the existing European and national EP&R provisions and to produce a report by mid-2014. This topic was not adequately addressed in the post-Fukushima stress tests. European convergence on the highest standards of nuclear safety is the goal that NTW has set for itself. List of acronyms: (* ) ANCCLI: French Federation of Local Commission of Information (**) DG Ener-EC: Directorate-General for Energy- European Commission (***) EESC: European Economic and Social Committee (****) ENEF: European Nuclear Energy Forum (*****) UNECE: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    NUCLEAR TRANSPARENCY WATCH (NTW) Nuclear Transparency Watch (NTW) Mrs.

    Michle Rivasi, Chair 38 rue Saint-Sabin 75011 Paris e:mail: rivasi.michele@wanadoo.fr To: The European Commissioner for Energy Mr. Gnther Oettinger c/o Mr. Mark van Stiphout e-mail: mark.van-stiphout@ec.europa.eu DG Energy Nuclear Safety and Fuel Cycle Mr. Massimo Garribba e-mail: massimo.garribba@ec.europa.eu Conc.: Radioactive waste export from Hungary to Russia Brussels, 26 November 2013

    Dear Mr. Oettinger, Nuclear Transparency Watch has been informed that the Hungarian nuclear energy operator MVM is currently preparing the export of high-level nuclear waste from the INES 3 incident in 2003 in the Paks 2 unit to Mayak in Russia. We have been informed that the contracts for this export foresee transfer of ownership of this waste to Rosatom / TVEL or another institution in Russia, and do not foresee any return of the waste for final disposal in Hungary or another EU country. The 2011/70/EURATOM Directive of 19 July 2011 states the following: Art. 4(1): Member States shall establish and maintain national policies on spent fuel and radioactive waste management. Without prejudice to Article 2(3), each Member State shall have ultimate responsibility for management of the spent fuel and radioactive waste generated in it. Art. 4(2): Where radioactive waste or spent fuel is shipped for processing or reprocessing to a Member State or a third country, the ultimate responsibility for the safe and responsible disposal of those materials, including any waste as a byproduct, shall remain with the Member State or third country from which the radioactive material was shipped. Art. 4(4): Radioactive waste shall be disposed of in the Member State in which it was generated, unless at the time of shipment an agreement, taking into account the criteria established by the Commission in accordance with Article 16(2) of Directive 2006/117/Euratom, has entered into force between the Member State concerned and another Member State or a third country to use a disposal facility in one of them. Nuclear Transparency Watch has been informed that the shipment of this high-level waste to Mayak will not be for the purpose of reprocessing with consecutive return of the reprocessing products and waste by-products to Hungary, but for a transfer of the waste, including transfer of ownership of the waste, to Rosatom / TVEL or another institution in Russia. Nuclear Transparency Watch has been informed that even in case the new owner would decide to reprocess the waste, waste produced as by-product as well as retrieved products for which no further use can be found will remain in Russia and under ownership of the new owner, i.e. out of the ultimate responsibility of MVM. Nuclear Transparency Watch 38 rue Saint Sabin 75011 Paris RNA: nW751222083

    NUCLEAR TRANSPARENCY WATCH (NTW)

    Nuclear Transparency Watch is aware of the fact that neither Rosatom / TVEL nor any other Russian institution, nor Russia as state has a licensed and operating final disposal facility for high-level waste. The agreement(s) made between MVM and Rosatom / TVEL or another Russian institution therefore cannot provide any insurance concerning final disposal of this waste or products and by-products of reprocessing in case the new owner would use that option. The operations of Rosatom / TVEL in Mayak include temporary storage of high-level wastes, but no operational final disposal that would fulfil EU quality standards. As far as we have been informed, the agreement between MVM and Rosatom / TVEL or another institution does not foresee repatriation of the waste to Hungary in case Rosatom / TVEL or any other institution in Russia fails to provide such a final disposal. Nuclear Transparency Watch is furthermore aware of the dismal track record of Rosatom / TVEL's Mayak operations and the historical and current exposure of the surrounding population to unacceptable levels of radioactivity and lack of sufficient care and compensation for the effects of historical exposures. Given that track record, Nuclear Transparency Watch has severe concerns about whether even temporary storage or processing and consecutive storage of the waste would fulfil EU standards. Nuclear Transparency Watch is not convinced that MVM or Hungary will be able to execute its ultimate responsibility for care of this waste in case the new owners or Russia fail to fulfil EU quality standards, nor is Nuclear Transparency Watch convinced that MVM or even the Hungarian Armed Forces would be able to repatriate the waste in case EU quality levels would be flouted by the new owners or Russia. With that, Nuclear Transparency Watch is convinced that MVM and Hungary under this plan are giving up their ultimate responsibility for this waste.

    Nuclear Transparency Watch hereby asks the European Commission the following: 1. 2. 3. Is the European Commission informed as prescribed in art. 4.4 of the Directive of this planned export of high level radioactive waste? Given the above, what is the opinion of the European Commission concerning the legality of this export? Given the fact that this export means a de facto transfer of ultimate responsibility of high-level radioactive waste from an EU Member State to a third state, which steps will the European Commission take to prevent this waste export?

    With regards, Mrs. Michele Rivasi, Chair Nuclear Transparency Watch (NTW)

    Nuclear Transparency Watch 38 rue Saint Sabin 75011 Paris RNA: nW751222083

    You might also like