You are on page 1of 104

rexresearch.

com

Joel McCLAIN & Norman WOOTAN The Magnetic Resonance Amplifier

An Introduction to the Magnetic Resonance Amplifier Joel McClain: Magnetic Resonance Amplifier !escription of Operation "angard Note J# McClain & Norman Wootan: Ne$ %&' (rea)thru Magnetic Resonance Amplifier "angard Note Tom (earden: *erroelectric Capacitors and the Magnetic Resonance Amplifier J# McClain: The Rule of Nines +al *o,: Meeting The One Watt Challenge -eel.net ((/ Messages /cott Little & +al &uthoff: '0aluation of Magnetic Resonance Amplifier 1MRA2 /# Little & +# &uthoff : 'rror Anal.sis of MRA Test Results /# Little & +# &uthoff : Clarification of MRA Test Conditions N# Wootan3 J# McClain3 & R#Ta.lor: MRA4: Magnetic Resonance Antenna5 &arts /ources for the MRA !an !a0idson: 6/ &atent 7 8389:3;;8 < Acoustic Magnetic &o$er =enerator

An Introduction to the Magnetic Resonance Amplifier


>. Joel McClain & Norman Wootan With low-level ultrasonic input signals, the Magnetic Resonance Amplifier (MRA) produces usable direct current power at levels above unity. his circuit is based upon the wor! and theories of "ohn #rnst Worrell $eely, and is offered into the public domain in his memory. Introduction < Without lengthy discussion about the aether, tetrahedral geometric aggregate resonance or the Rule of %ines, it is possible to understand this circuit as basically a tuned magnetic and &uart' amplifier. (owever, it was necessary to study those sub)ects in order to design and build the MRA, so if you want to fully reali'e how it wor!s, avail yourself of the files on $eely%et which contain all of that and much more. *n the MRA schematic below, there is a tunable low-power oscillator which supplies a signal to one side of a barium titanate transducer. he opposite side of the transducer is connected to a primary coil which is wrapped around a barium ferrite magnet core. he opposite end of the primary goes bac! to the oscillator. A secondary is wrapped around the primary and is connected to an ordinary bridge rectifier, and the output of the bridge is applied to a +, load. A filter capacitor can be used on the output of the bridge, and was used on the MRA which we built. Additionally, a load resistor across the capacitor will !eep the output +, from getting too high as the circuit is tuned. We found that a -. ohm, /. watt resistor was sufficient. 0nce this has been assembled, put a voltmeter across the output resistor to monitor the voltage rise as the circuit is tuned. Ad)ust the oscillator fre&uency to provide the highest +, output. +uring this process, be aware that the voltages across the pie'o and the coil will be very much higher than the signal level which you are applying. We have seen combined voltages of almost /,... volts A, with only -. volts A, of signal input. When the circuit is tuned, the magnet will be 1singing1 at around 2,... to //,... ('. *f the pie'o sings, you are e3ceeding its power capabilities and will need to reduce the number of turns on your primary. he fre&uency that resonates both the pie'o and the magnet at optimum resonance will be three times (three octaves above) the fre&uency at which the magnet is singing. his is the nine harmonics that are mentioned in the Rule of %ines. o test the circuit, place a precision, high wattage, low ohm resistor in series with the output from the oscillator to the pie'o, and measure the voltage drop. *t should be very small, less than ../ volt A,. 4se this value to determine current in the series circuit, and then calculate power.

%e3t, measure the +, voltage across your output load resistor, and once again calculate power. 5ou should be between three to four times above the previously calculated input power. 0nce the circuit is in operation, you will note that the voltage will vary by ../ volt +, or more, depending upon the time of day. his is due to the nature of etheric forces inherent in the #arth6s magnetic field. Watch for pea! voltage at or before sunrise. *n our circuit, we measured ...27 volt A, drop across a 8 ohm series resistor, for a total of ..92: W dissipation in the primary. With this, we attained 8.;: W of output power and used this to drive a lamp and a motor. *ncreasing the signal voltage had the effect of decreasing the primary current while boosting output power, thus improving the power gain ratio. We believe that larger power systems can be built by using larger coils, more pie'os, and a lower fre&uency, as long as the aggregate combination is within the resonant fre&uency range of the components. he MRA is essentially a means of releasing the electrical energy stored in magnets. As such, it is an A, battery with +, output. *t can be used for a portable, self-charging power supply with a solid state oscillator and rechargeable battery. <or those who want a synopsis of the technology, the following paragraphs are offered, but it is strongly suggested that you follow up this reading with a more thorough study of the $eely%et files. Matter = #nergy. o change matter, change the energy. ,reation of a magnet is achieved by a process which causes the matter to be both e3panded and compressed at the same time, with the result that a magnet is in a constant state of collapse. his is why magnets attract material with similar lattice structures, as they attempt to fill the energy void which created them. he 1domains1 of the magnet are fi3ed after the process of magneti'ation, and the only way to e3tract electrical energy is to physically spin a coil relative to a magnet. (owever, it is also possible to induce virtual rotation by applying the resonant fre&uency of the magnet, which causes the lattices and the domains to vibrate. (owever, the power re&uired to do this is greater than the energy released by the virtual rotation. herefore it is necessary to increase the vibration without using e3cessive current. he pie'o has a virtually ine3haustible supply of free electrons, and it releases them when it is stressed. 4sing the pie'o in series with the primary coil will almost eliminate primary current, because it is voltage which stresses the pie'o, not current. herefore the pie'o can be stressed with very little actual power, and provide the current to the primary coil which vibrates the domains of the magnet. he pie'o is the catalyst for the circulating current with the primary coil. he circulating current is additive, and this is the reason for the high potentials developed across both the pie'o and the primary coil. *t is at this point that resonance becomes important. 5ou must have three octaves of separation between the magnet resonant fre&uency and the signal supplied to the pie'o. he circulating current is rich in harmonics, and this is necessary for the operation of the circuit.

Although the circuit is simple, it utili'es the concepts of phi, of virtual rotation, of tetrahedral geometry, pie'o and transformer theory, and electrical !nowledge. *t is not suggested as a beginner pro)ect, because of the high voltages present. <or engineers and technicians of e3perience, it may be difficult to accept that the MRA is above unity. he ramifications are enormous. (opefully, it will help to build a better world.

The Magnetic Resonance Amplifier: !escription of Operation


>. Joel McClain he MRA is a series resonant >, circuit in which power gain is attainable as a result of the increase in effective impedance under certain operating conditions. When the series impedance increases, primary current is reduced. When the power available from the secondary coil either remains the same or increases as the primary circuit impedance increases, a power gain occurs. his is not possible with a series resonant circuit made of conventional materials. #ven unity power transfer is considered to be unattainable as a result of accumulated losses in the components, which are passive (reactive) devices. Materials and construction

methods are chosen for these components based upon the type of application and fre&uency to be applied, with the goal of minimi'ing losses. A typical capacitor with polyethylene dielectric has a dielectric constant of 8.- times that of air. Air has a constant of /.., and is the basis for comparison. itanium dio3ide, however, has a dielectric constant ma3imum of /;., and a corresponding power factor of only .....9, comparable with polyethylene, so that the dissipation of primary current in the dielectric is e3tremely low. his is where the comparison ends, because the titanium composite 1capacitor1 is also a pie'oelectric device as well as an e3cellent capacitor. (eat adversely affects the power factor of most dielectric materials. itanium 'irconate, however, contains polar molecules which rotate as thermal pressure is applied. his rotation increases the dielectric constant if the fre&uency applied is e&ual to or lower than the resonant fre&uency of the dielectric. At series resonance, the rotation of polar molecules contributes to heat? as the dielectric constant increases, a corresponding release of free electrons occurs, as a direct result of the pie'oelectric properties of the device. *n application, the MRA is tuned at resonance for ma3imum power transfer, then detuned slightly for ma3imum power gain. his relates directly to the use of thermal pressure at resonance, and the effect that this has on continued polar rotation and the release of donor electrons. he coil, or primary of the MRA is a magnetic core which, relative to the fi3ed capacitance of the pie'o, is a tuned permeability device. his is often used in R< devices to attain a stable resonant fre&uency. Magnetic materials are chosen based upon the operating characteristics of the intended application to reduce eddy currents in the operating range. *n these applications, the resonant fre&uency of the magnet itself is avoided, as this would 1beat1 with the oscillating current. (owever, in the MRA, this is the e3act effect which we want. he barium ferrite magnet resonates audibly at fre&uencies which are harmonics of the series resonant fre&uency. he effect of this in a typical audio application is called harmonic distortion, and is not desirable, but once again, in the MRA, this is what we want to occur. here is energy in the harmonics, and this energy serves to both counter eddy losses as well as to oppose primary current flow, while contributing to circulating current within the resonant circuit. he net effect of this, is that when the MRA is detuned, harmonics of the audible fre&uency 1beat1 with primary current, opposing its flow, while the increase in circulating current couples more power to the secondary, and therefore to the load. his is how the power gain is attained, basically by considering the naturally occuring harmonics as beneficial instead of as undesirable effects to be filtered out.

When the MRA is detuned, the effective impedance increases as seen by the source, while the power available to the load decreases in less proportion. his is measurable by using resistive e&uivalent circuit testing. (owever, the detuning is load dependent, and slight ad)ustments are re&uired if the load re&uirement is greater than the power band of a harmonic interaction. After retuning, the power to the load will increase in &uantum intervals as the circulating current is reinforced by the reaction of the permeable magnet core. his will be seen as slight incremental voltage increases across the load device. 0nce the magnet is 1ringing1, it6s fre&uency and therefore harmonics remain stable, as long as the series resonant range is not e3ceeded. herefore, the detuning affects the pie'o only, and the circulating current increase is a result of the phase relationship between the harmonic and the source. @oltage amplification is seen across the primary, measurably higher than the source voltage, and this is 1seen1 by the secondary. his is not the same thing as a power gain, because the power gain is a direct result of effective impedance. *t should also be noted that the term 1virtual rotation1 has been applied in describing the operation of the MRA. he comparison is made with a generator, in which relative motion occurs between a coil and magnet. Rather than use physical energy to rotate a mass, the MRA uses resonance to rotate the energy. his is seen in the polar rotation of the pie'o dielectric as well as in the molecular energy occuring in the reactive component of the magnet, ie, the ringing. he lattice structures of the pie'o and magnet are compatible for virtual rotation, and the materials complement each other electrically. *n the past, researchers have noted many effects which occur at aggregate resonance, which typically includes a range of three octaves. Anomalous energy gains were referred to as 1aetheric1. he aether was believed to e3ist outside of the three physical dimensions, and could be 1tapped1 for free energy at resonance. Aetheric energy is said to be limitless, but to vary locally with increases in earth magnetic fields at sunset and sunrise, li!e the tides of an infinite ocean. his effect is not thoroughly understood, but has been observed in the MRA, as increases in output in the early morning, and decreases in the early evening. his is still being studied. #3perimentation will determine the optimum MRA design for a specific range of applications.

"anguard Note
he use of >en' >aw (bac! #M<) is legend in free energy circuits. When the bac! #M< is reversed and phase matched to the forward #M<, you have an increase in efficiency because of the reduction of eddy current heating through the addition of the previously wasted power.

his is generally understood to apply primarily to magnetic flu3, yet because fre&uency is involved, phase con)ugate principles play a ma)or part. Ahase con)ugation applies to all fre&uencies regardless of the type of energy being used. (armony (constructive interference) and dissonance (destructive interference) are controlled using phasing and fre&uency relationships. *f the rhythmic energy flowing through the mass is made resonant to the mass aggregate resonance, you further reduce the resistance and impedance, thereby achieving unity and in some cases overunity. Most people want clean and simple circuits. hese would not entail physical motion or large inductive masses as are encountered in orthodo3 generators. he MRA circuit fits this approach very nicely because it does not involve moving mass, but rather moving energy harmoniously to produce energy. <urther information on the MRA, its operational characteristics, correlations and updates will be provided as they are documented.

Ne$ %&' (rea)thru Magnetic Resonance Amplifier


>. Joel McClain & Norman Wootan Alease %0 #B his is a preliminary report that will be followed by updates with more detail. <uture versions will include various measurements of the components used in the circuit that is currently running. <rom all appearances at this date, the circuit components will simply give varying outputs and do not appear to be all that critical. *t was felt that this information should be released to the public as rapidly as possible, rather than ris! loss of the information or the demo by 6circumstances6 beyond our control. here have been too many discoveries which have disappeared by not being openly shared. We would rather ris! being 6flamed6 by other e3perimenters who actually C4*>+ (# ,*R,4* than ta!e the chance of the information being lost by !eeping it within a select group. 0ur two primary fears are that someone will attempt to patent what is intended to be a gift to humanity, possibly with an intent to profit from others wor! or to loc! it away, the other that it might be suppressed in some other fashion. herefore, the widest possible distribution is re&uested, and duplication attempted wherever possible. At the time of this correction to the original file, we have confirmation as to the numbers and others are wor!ing on the circuit on their own. Alease ta!e this information in the spirit of how it is given, as a gift to humanity. he inventors are "oel Mc,lain and %orman Wootan. 5ou can contact them via $eely%et or directly.

he circuit is being tested at various levels and attempts at duplication are under way. At this point, there is only one circuit. We will openly post other successful duplications or failures. Alease feel free to try it yourself. he cost is minimal. 0ne other point, the crystal transducer was thought to be barium titanate and there is reason to believe it is in fact titanium 'irconate. hese are disc shaped, about -1 in diameter with a /1 diameter hole in the center. he disc is about -D21 thic! and is coated with silver on both sides. han! you for your open- mindedness. hey are advertised in the bac! of many electronics maga'ines for about E: each. We have access to a small stoc! and might offer them for e3periments should people as! for them. Food luc!, and G#*H# (# +A5I

"angard Note
his device incorporates power multiplication principles using multiple resonances as claimed by $eely and (endershot. *t also corresponds in some ways with <loyd Gweet6s @ A and "oe Aarr6s energy spheres from pyramids. "oel called Gunday night in an e3cited state. (e and %orman too! turns e3plaining what they had achieved using this circuit. he power input measurements were about 9..mWatts and yet the circuit was generating about 8.: Watts on the output. %orman hoo!ed up a +, motor and he said it was spinning li!e cra'y in addition to a light bulb glowing brightly. %orman was laughing and said they6d beat (arold Authoffs6 0ne Watt ,hallenge as issued at the /JJ7 *G%# conference in +enver. his has created &uite a bit of e3citement and Authoff now has a fa3ed copy of the circuit. %o doubt it will be everywhere in a very short time. he hope by "oel and %orman is that others will duplicate the initial effect and be able to e3pand on it to derive useful power. Gweet claimed something on the order of /B-,...,... over-unity. he input power to his device was /. @A, at 8J uamps (8J.mWatts). he output had been loaded to as high as -,... Watts. he initial MRA circuit is something on the order of /B: and is believed to be scalable. "oel says the coil he had wound around the barium ferrite magnet was not in the least precision and he is of the mind that a huge coil surrounding the magnet will produce a proportional increase in power. #arly tal!s with various $eely%etters about the Gweet circuit led many of us to believe that Carium, when e3cited, rings for a long time when the e3citer is removed. At the *G%# conference, +on Watson confirmed this with his analogy of glowing luciferase as found in fireflys or other phosphorescent materials. A wea! stimulation continues to produce light for a time after the stimulation is removed. Go, here is a wonderful opportunity to build a pioneering device. *f you have &uestions or suggestions, you may direct them to "oel Mc,lain or %orman Wootan at $eely%et.

* thin! they both need to be commended for their willingness to share what many would !eep proprietary or die with the secret.

*erroelectric Capacitors & the Magnetic Resonance Amplifier


>. Tom (earden *n a nonlinear ferroelectric capacitor there are three ma)or nonlinear processes involved, so it is possible to carefully choose and arrange conditions so that the current through the capacitor moves against the voltage across its terminals. With adroit switching and timing, and some consideration for resonance effects, it is in theory possible to use such highly nonlinear effects in a circuit to allow (/) an overpotential at the terminals of the battery as a reaction from the ferroelectric capacitor, (8) conse&uent recharging of the battery via that bac! potential on the battery side, while the load is also being powered, (-) conse&uent driving of the load on the load side of the terminals, and (7) having a bypass ferroelectric capacitor across the terminals of the battery, where the capacitor is in the 1current against the voltage1 condition. Mc>ain and Wooten patented a great little MRA (Magnetic Resonance Amplifier) system, based on that application. +r. Robert Cass, a very fine electrodynamicist of e3ceptional !nowledge, e3perience, and ability wrote the patent for them, and assisted in their wor!. <or that he was persecuted, un)ustly attac!ed, and suffered financial difficulties. he 1system1 does not forgive highly &ualified scientists who ta!e a serious interest in 1perpetual motion machines1 -- as permissible Ma3wellian open dissipative systems are erroneously and derogatorily labeled by the orthodo3 scientific community. Any scientist violating that in&uisition suffers the conse&uences. After technical discussions bac! and forth, the Aatent 0ffice even notified Wooten and Mc>ain that the patent had been accepted and the patent would be issued. Within days, to their consternation the patent was re)ected and that was the end of that. *n other words, the fi3 was in. Our O$n ',perience In ?O>taining? &roper *erroelectric Capacitors < (ere6s an interesting little tidbit, for what it6s worth. We here at , #, had included a specific use of ferroelectric capacitors (<#,s) in one of our own patent applications. We attempted to obtain an <#, on the open mar!et, one with the publici'ed nearly- s&uare G-curve of hysteresis. %o capacitor manufacturer we contacted had one for saleI * went all the way to a Gwedish company, was assured they made )ust what * needed, and purchased several from them to be shipped by airmail. *n due time they arrived. hey did not have the s&uare G-curve at all, but were carefully layered to eliminate that Gcurve, into a rather straight slanting curve. hat !ind of curve is absolutely useless for overunity applications.

%ow why would anyone wish to purchase a supposedly nonlinear capacitor for its very nonlinearity, and instead purchase one that has been altered to behave )ust as linearly as possibleK Why would a company advertise such a nonlinear capacitor, then sell you one that is highly lineari'edK And considering the rather substantial literature on nonlinear capacitors with s&uare G-curves, why do not the capacitor companies sell suchK We eventually found there is indeed a 4.G. manufacturer of ferroelectric capacitors with precisely that G-curve hysteresis loop. here was )ust one little problem. hey had an agreement with the 4.G. %avy for all their production of those capacitors, and in that agreement they were not to sell any to private persons or companies. %ow why would the 4.G. %avy wish to restrict a perfectly unclassified, open component from being sold on the open commercial mar!etK HoundsI *f one were a conspiracy buff, one might even try to connect this with the 4.G. %avy6s long suppression of the $ron negative resistor. +o you suppose there could actually be some !ind of connection between the twoK Why of course notI Aaranoia and all that, you !now. And still one wonders... he literature continues to publish tests of )ust such ferroelectric capacitors, etc. ,ontacting several of the researchers who author those papers, we found that they (at least the ones contacted) were all ma!ing their own ferroelectric capacitors if they wished one with that s&uare G-curveI %o one seemed to !now where we could )ust purchase one off the shelf. Maybe all that is )ust coincidence. And maybe not. A &ossi>le Interpretation < What the s&uare G-curve hysteresis loop means is that, in one region of operation, with only a very tiny voltage change, you can get a rather enormous current change from that capacitor. *n another region of operation, you can get a very large voltage change from the capacitor for a very small current change. *n other words, biased into one region, you have essentially a voltage device. *n the other region, you have essentially a current device. %either device will 1cost1 you very much energy to operate it in its region. (owever, if you then nonlinearly mi3 the two outputs )ust right, as we filed on methods of doing, then bingoI 5ou had a mi3er device whose output now had both large current and large power, but you 1paid for1 and input not nearly so much 1energy dissipation1 (remember, engineers calculate energy dissipation flow, never energy transport flowI) to the mi3er as what would be output by the mi3er. he whole &uestion is this. We all !now about ordinary nonlinear mi3ing and mi3ers. We !now that two signals can indeed be mi3ed nonlinearly. ,an we build a nonlinear mi3er and a dual circuit, where we feed a voltage-li!e signal in and also a current-li!e signal in to the mi3er, get the two combined into a high voltage, high current signal output, and do that without bac!-field coupling onto the two input 1signals1 to force e&ual energy dissipation in the input. >oo! at this very carefully. here is absolutely no conservation of energy law that re&uires that the energy input circuit dissipate as much energy as does the load circuit that receives the energy to power it. Go why are we taught only those mi3ing circuits

that will indeed force e&ual input dissipationK We need three things in the inputB (/) lots of voltage, (8) lots of current, and (-) small energy dissipation. hat means we need a 1voltage-li!e1 input and a 1current1 li!e input, which do not interact with each other on the input side of the mi3er. We then need a mi3er that will mi3 the two into a single signal with high voltage and high current, but will not bac!-couple its fields onto the input circuit to up the input dissipation. *s all this mystery in trying to obtain s&uare G-curve ferroelectric capacitors really due to the fact that it is possible to use them together with other circuit components to produce such an overunity mi3erK ,ould something li!e that be behind what happened to Mc>ain and Wooten, and to +r. CassK Again, at this point we wonder... Go you thin! such odd mi3ing violates the conservation of energy lawK hen thin! again. here is no valid law of physics anywhere -- in complete contradiction to the assumptions in most electrical te3ts -- that you have to conserve wor!. #nergy, yes. Wor!, no. he energy that a circuit captures can involve the voltage only. Remember, W = f&. o get lots of W ()oules) collected for use to power loads, we need lots of @ (that is, +f ) and lots of &. We then need them mi3ed (interacting together). hat6s it. Anything else is what the circuit we construct is doing to fight us bac!. Go, it would seem that we should focus on reducing the ability of that circuit to fight us bac!, while still doing the voltage-amperage mi3ing and interaction thing. #ven in the flawed old electrodynamics, one volt is one )oule collected per coulomb of charge collector. Go if you place one volt on a circuit which has few +rude electrons for collection, you get very little collected energy in that circuit (and note that the energy dissipated in that circuit can only be the energy that it first intercepts and collects). And if you then input the same voltage to a circuit with lots of +rude electrons, this second circuit will collect (and can then dissipate) lots of )oules of collected energy. When you change the voltage of a circuit, you change the potential energy available for collection and dissipation. (ow much it collects and dissipates, then depends upon how many collectors it has to do so, and the dissipaters it has to change the form of the collected energy. Go one tric! would appear to be to feed a nonlinear mi3ing unit from two circuitsB one optimi'ed for voltage and starved for current, and the second starved for voltage and optimi'ed for current. he one remaining tric! is to prevent any bac!-field coupling from the output of the mi3er bac! to the two feed circuits. *f you accomplish that, you have yourself a nice little overunity device, perfectly permissible by the laws of physics and thermodynamics, and one which does not violate conservation of energy. *t darn sure violates 1conservation of wor!1, however. <or that matter, so does a windmill or a waterwheel, or a solar cell. 5ou yourself do not have to perform wor! on something to get it to collect energy (asymmetrically regauge). *t can collect the energy freely, if you arrange it correctly. Gomething else -- such as a free flow of energy from the environment -- is perfectly capable of doing that wor! on the intercepting collector, so that collection of energy in the circuit occurs. *n my view, Mc>ain and Wooten were accomplishing something very similar to our notion of nonlinearly mi3ing a low power high voltage input and a low power high current input, but using ferroelectric nonlinear resonance as the 1magic1 mi3er to

combine cheap high voltage with cheap high current and obtain the product of the two while only paying for their 1sum1, so to spea!. hin! about it. Cut if you wish to pursue that approach to overunity, let me advise you to first do your homewor! on nonlinear resonance, as opposed to the linear resonance in almost all the normal te3tboo!s. *t6s not at all )ust a 1capacitance-inductance-resistance1 business or )ust simple >, resonance. >, resonance alone has never added a single e3cess )oule of energy to the power system.

The Rule of Nines: Resonant =eometr. and the %ero &oint


>. Joel McClain 1%est two tetrahedrons and you have the !eys to the universe.1 he word 1rule1 has several different meanings -- as a form of law, or as a form of dominion, or as a measuring standard. his te3t uses the word in all three conte3ts to define the effect of the supreme chord, the trinity of harmony, in the universe. *n the late /Jth and early 8.th centuries, independent researchers began to notice the 1anomalous1 effects of applying resonance to a controlled e3periment. hen, as now, this area of 1science1 is far from the mainstream. he results of those early e3periments, such as the lightning of esla and the motors of $eely, have been ignored both as science and as history...at least in America. #lsewhere, the wor! of esla is revered and has been 1amplified1 by paid research. With the creation of the Magnetic Resonance Amplifier, or MRA, perhaps history and science will have to ta!e a second loo!. he theories behind the MRA are the same as those of esla, $eely, Russell, Cearden, $ing and others. he application, however, in a closed-loop HA# device, ta!es a sharp turn away from effect and into application. >oo! at either a piece of &uart' or a magnet, and you are loo!ing at trapped energy. ap the &uart', and you will get a spar! as the electrical potential of the &uart' instantaneously )umps. Gpin a magnet relative to a coil of wire, and electrical current flows in the wire. (ow do we e3tract the power of these materials without the attendant physical energy re&uired to either tap or spin themK Matter = energy. o convert matter to energy, resonate the matter. o achieve energy output which is above the energy applied at resonance, use three octaves, and there will be three harmonious notes in each octave, for a total of nine resonant fre&uencies. hese notes occur naturally when the base fre&uency applied is three octaves above the magnet6s resonant fre&uency, and e&ual to the resonance of the &uart'.

*n this way, the potential applied to the &uart' 1taps1 it, without the need to use physical force. he result is electrical output. ,onnect this output to a coil around a magnet, and the domains of the magnet, which comprise a tiny portion of its weight, and which do all of the 1wor!1 in a generator, will be forced to spin. his spin is called 1virtual rotation1, because it is the spin of energy without the spin of the matter. (owever, this is only one application. (ow can we be sure that the 1rule1 applies anywhere else, much less universallyK We have to go very far bac! in history to find the answer to this &uestion. *t involves Ahi, the universal constant, and delves deeply into the construction of earth6s great tetrahedrons. %est two tetrahedrons, and put them in an orb, and you have a miniature model of the earth6s magnetic field. Where the 1bases1 of the tet6s touch the orb, you have the latitudes where all of the ancient pyramids were built. he 1top1 and 1bottom1 points are the north and south poles. his shows the naturally occuring magnetic resonance of earth as an 1orb1 in rotation. ,onnect lines between the points, and you have a map of the ley lines, which were mapped very accurately thousands of years ago. Models of the earth as described above have been found in the ruins of every civili'ation which built pyramids. #arth is, as it must be, a model of the natural harmonic relationship which e3ists at every level, from the universe itself to the subatomic. he relationships have been understood for a long, long time. his !nowledge, and the use of the energy which it can be used to provide, was believed to be the curriculum of 1mystery schools1 in #gypt and Freece. *f you loo! at the lattice geometry of silicon or germanium, you will find tetrahedrons. *n his famous 1ring1, (ans %ieper allowed the silicon of transistors to achieve selfresonance, with the result that the circuit became lower in weight. his implies that resonance may also be the !ey to countering the effects of gravity, or rather, the effect called gravity, for gravity is an effect, not a force. Fravity is 1suspended1 when you cancel the spin of the energy which comprises matter by resonating the matter. Cy virtually rotating the lattices, the subatomic particle spin virtually stops, li!e a spinning ob)ect seen with a synchroni'ed strobe light. Cecause gravity is a comple3 &uadrupole effect, when you stop the spin, you lose the effect. he matter which comprises the &uart' and the magnet of the MRA is comprised of cube lattices, each of which is a nested tetrahedron at 7: degrees relative to the polar a3is of the molecules. ogether in a circuit, there is a J.-degree phase separation, which allows the resonant energy to create the needed harmonics to fully resonate both materials. his is the application of the rule of nines. *t is a standard, the standard of the geometry of the universe? it is the ruling law of nature? and it is the measuring tool for all electrical and mechanical interaction. *f, as some have suggested, the ancient 1sacred1 !nowledge was shared by e3traterrestrials to permit the construction of the pyramids, and if, as we have seen, resonance is the !ey to anti-gravity as well as to free energy, then the tetrahedron has very far reaching implications.

Meeting The One Watt Challenge


>. +al *o, New Energy News - (9)B /J-8/, %ovember /JJ: The Magnetic Resonance Amplifier Tests: We have received copies of two official reports from independent laboratories that show power out ranging from /.9 to over 7 times the input power to a magnetic resonance amplifier. 0ne of the important factors in this device appears to be the type of magnetic material used as the core of the transformer. he transformer appears to be the most important component in this unusual energy-amplifying circuit.

-eel.net ((/ Messages


Message J2:. (/8D/-DJ7 .JB-/) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB MRA *nput <or those who plan to build their own MRA, you will have to use sine wave signal wave input. *6ve tried s&uare wave, and although the magnet will 1sing1, the output +, power will be below unity. * believe this is because the circuit can6t 1breathe1 evenly with s&uare wave input. Message J2;: (/8D/-DJ7 /JB8-) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB MRA 1 ech Culletin1 *f you build your own MRA, there are a few things that you should !now that aren6t in the file yet...they6re still being discovered. <irst of all, don6t wear your &uart' watch while you wor! on the MRA, as the &uart' will react with the circuit and run slow. Gecondly, avoid using scopes for anything e3cept occasional waveform chec!s, because there is so much flu3 in the air that it will build up on the scope and s!ew your display. hirdly, use a hand-held as opposed to a panel meter if you can because the flu3 buildup on a panel meter chassis will destroy the front end transistors...* !now, as * did it. <ourth, the constant ringing will drive you nuts and give you a headache in short order. <ifth, if you ta!e the pie'o out of the circuit after it has been on for a while, as it cools, it will !eep building up charges, and will bite you when you pic! it up.

Gi3th, if the pie'o screeches, shut the MRA down and wait for a while before you start it up again. he pie'os are bad tempered if you overdrive them, and will sul! for a while before they wor! right. his ain6t your daddy6s oldsmobile... we6re still learning to drive it so there may be more of these 1field bulletins1. L "oel Message J2;9 (/8D/-DJ7 8.B..) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA CillB Aoint well ta!en. We will prove out the circuit and you will !now by the message traffic as to our progress. We all value your input and guidance therefore )ump in and help us out as we sort this beast out. * have a very similar circuit to "oel6s and we compare notes constantly. * wound a coil on a barium ferrite magnet with my windings running parallel to the 1Cloch wall1 where "oel6s coil has the windings running perpendicular to the 1Cloch wall1. My *D0 ratio so far as * can determine is around /8B/ which is some improvement but we need testing. Cert Aool )ust left to go and build a similar circuit so the more fol!s that build, test and improve on the design the better. han!s again. L %orm Message J228 (/8D/7DJ7 .2B/;) <romB %orman Wootan oB All Gub)ectB MRA ( ech Culletin) Gince "oel and * have created a lot of interest in the MRA device we will place everything on line so that no 1stone is left unturned1. >ong ago * saw a sci-fi movie of a suitcase si'e device that you could plug any si'e A, load into it and it would power it with no problem. * dreamed of building such a device by employing a bloc! of natural &uart' with a mechanical oscillator attached to all faces ( esla oscillator) to force the &uart' to yield free electrons. * envisioned the output (high voltage) to be stored in a capacitor ban! (/ !ilo )oule) them the output going into an inverter circuit and stepdown transformer to ta!e this pie'o generated voltage down to a useful A, voltage. %ow "oel and * have combined this effect to the resonating of the lattice structure of a magnet to sum the outputs of the pie'o effect and the ferro-resonant effect to give an over-unity total at the bridge rectifier. >ast night Cert Aool came over to gather up the needed supplies to build a prototype circuit to do independent evaluation. After * had run the circuit through the paces noting the outputs and thoroughly discussing what we thought was going on here * turned off the meters, scopes and the signal generator and finally went to bed. Well * wo!e up a 8B..AM with a headache, went to get the tylenol and went into the room with the test rig on the bench. * turned on the fre&uency counter and found that the circuit was running in free oscillation with no input. Although no power was being produced the free running oscillations were filling my living space with a high fre& ultrasonic s&ueal that as "oel has warned will give you a migraine headache in short order. he free oscillation was M+M+s around 77$(H with the fre& counter ranging up and down (no loc! on). * had to ta!e the circuit apart to stop the ultrasonic ringing. As "oel has pointed out these titanium 'irconate transducers, once set into resonance will continue to ring for a long period. Gince there is possible some

conditioning ta!ing place within the crystalline structure of the material * believe that over a long conditioning period (burn in time) the whole circuit can be ma!e sensitive to a combination of two fre&uencies that are necessary. he first fre& involved is the input to drive the transducer which has to be - octaves down from the fundamental natural fre&uency of the ferro-magnetic resonant fre&uency. Although it has not been mentioned before in 1A1 public on this net, "oel and * were successful in isolating and identifying the fundamental <erromagnetic Resonant <re&uency as being around /;7.J $('. +oesn6t it sound ironic that this fre& should fall so close to what the ,orums have determined that esla designed his big coil out in ,olorado springs aroundK * have read several articles that speculated that the ferromagnetic fre& or the earth natural magnetic field resonated around /2. $('. With this /;7.J fre& in mind we have applied the "oel Mc,lain 1Rule of %ines1 to the circuit where we run the transducer at a fre& that is a multiple of the fundamental /;7.J ferro-resonant fre&. (is circuit is running at a fifth and mine is running at a third. #3ample- * input a sine wave signal at 8.82 @A, into the series resonant circuit at :J.;. (' and get a voltage developed across the transducer of 89..7 @ and a voltage across the coil of 87..8 with an output voltage from the bridge rectifier of -..8 @+,. *f every thing is running in an ideal phase relationship (transducer oscillations and ferro-coil oscillations) then the beat fre& will partially sum the two voltages since they are in a series circuit and set up a circulating current in the primary which when the primary winding and the secondary windings have the proper impedance matching will e3tract the ma3imum amount of energy from the circulating current in the transformer into a healthy output at the bridge which is far 0@#R4%* 5, high *D0 ratio. My circuit is showing a /-B/ ratio at this time and * have not even approached a good impedance match in the windings. A real sharp R< engineer could sort all the details out in short order. * don6t profess to be an R< engineer but have a good bac!ground in electronics. his is the reason for "oel and * going 1A4C>*, +0MA*%1 with the circuit so that some highly s!illed fol!s out there can ta!e this circuit and help develop it into something of practical use. We don6t want AR0<* motivated people to 1rip1 off the idea for self gain. We want any potential benefits of the circuit to remain free for the ta!ing. More notes as we learn more. As "oel says, 1we are li!e teenagers learning to drive dad6s 0lds1. A little help from interested fellow researchers is welcome. L %orm Message J22- (/8D/7DJ7 .JB/J) <romB %orman Wootan oB All Gub)ectB MRA ( ech Culletin) *n our discussion of the MRA circuit we !eep referring to the !ey part of the circuit as being a transducer. >et me clarify this a little for * !now there are a lot of fol!s out there who will be running around loo!ing for that same device that we have. <irst let6s settle the confusion about the type of material involved. "erry +ec!er and * bought some of these devices from anner #lectronics here in +allas and were told that they were CAR*4M * A%A # transducers made for the ultra-sonic heads in the ultra-sonic welders used in the plastics industry. here are numerous manufacturers of such welding devices in which they stac! these devices (each rated at :. Watts) to get the total power needed to weld plastic by !inetic contact heating. A physical description isB 8 inch outside diameter round with a :D2th inch hole through the center with a thic!ness of -D/9th inch with silver layered on each side which is convenient for soldering leads to the transducer. When employing these units they have to be suspended to that they

are free to resonate. +on6t lay them on a table or surface for this will dampen the free oscillations. We have not consulted an acoustical engineer to determine the best way to mount the units or attach the *D0 leads so as to provide the optimum free resonances. We have discussed the employment of tuned pipes of the proper wave length ratios needed to enhance the free resonant or targeted resonance that we desire. * have even thought of a mechanical type of tuning for! device that would give us the esla described 1,(*>+ 0% (# GW*%F1 type drive that would give the ma3imum output with the least possible input (wattage *D0). A good microwave engineer would possibly come up with a tuned cavity resonator which would drive the transducer at the optimum phase to e3tract the energy needed to drive the ferro-resonant coil in the primary. he magnet that "oel is using is from an *CM hard drive and is as followsB MAM+MC ; inches long N 8 inches N 8 inches with the magnetic 1Cloch wall1 across the thic!ness. <or those out there who may never heard the term 1Cloc! wall1 it means the neutral plane in a magnet. he magnetic orientation is across the thic!ness of the magnetic therefore cannot be described as a bar magnet which has it6s magnetic orientation along the long a3is. Cy using a magnet which has the flu3 across the thic!ness and the windings are wound around the center of the long a3is we have a coil which is wound with half of the winding turn in a 1%1 field and the other half of the turn in a 1G1 field. Ma!es no difference since the ob)ective here is to ring the magnet into a resonant fre& and it seems to me that it is easier to ring (mechanically) with the ends of the long a3is protruding from the coil. *n other words the 1%ode point1 is under the coil with the free ends oscillating. here are several ways to suspend a bar that is in free resonance. All you have to do is open your door chime and loo! at how the chime bar is mounted to e3tract the ma3imum acoustical energy from the hammer stri!e. he same ob)ective applies here so there is a lot of wor! to be done to ma3imi'e this device. *t is public so 504 can help sort it all out. "oel is using /:. turns in the primary and secondary of his ferromagnetic transformer. #3perimentation will provide the ideal ratios and impedance matching. Fet with the program and provide free e3change of findings so all may benefit. L %orm Message JJ-. (/8D/9DJ7 /2B.7) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB Gtarting 0ver (i %orm L *6m brea!ing in another pie'o. *t6s been on the sig gen for a few hours. * have /.--@A, at -7.8$(' from the sig gen, measuring current in line. ,urrent starts at 7ma, then slowly drops for about three minutes until it gets down to )ust /ma. Gince the /.--@A, is RMG, nput power to the MRA is /.--mw. 0utput is -./@+, across 7.;$ from the decade bo3 which calculates at 8..mw. Gince the meter is rated at 8..$(', * !now that we are well within its range. Fain at this low level of signal is /:.O. We will learn how to condition a pie'o from this, which we can pass along as another tech note. *t loo!s li!e we have to start at the lea!age threshold and wor! up in terms of power applied. *t will ta!e a >0 of tests to !eep from conditioning parts until they are )ust barely marginal under useful load. 0h well, nobody ever said it would be easy. he noise from the magnet is ama'ing, even at low power. L "oel Message JJ7J (/8D/;DJ7 .JB-J) <romB %orman Wootan

oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB MRA "oel L * have had my version of the MRA running for about /7 hours to condition the magnet and the driver pie'os so when * visit you we can do some parallel testing on the two circuits for more verification of over-unity operation. After running all night the circuit is definitely in the (P) column so we need to nail down the degree. * will bring out my scope echtronic 2. M(H with a current probe so maybe we can further brac!et that elusive input figure. #veryone agrees that when you are dealing with A, at 7.$(H with harmonic buc!ing ta!ing place it is sometimes very difficult to pin down the real input wattage. he 1e&uivalent resistance1 test that you are doing is * guess the only way, e3cept for some sophisticated e&uipment that (al and "ohn have down at the 1*nstitute for Advanced Gtudies1 in Austin. More later L %orm Message JJ:/ (/8D/;DJ7 /.B:.) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB MRA in ,onventional heory he MRA is a series resonant >, circuit in which power gain is attainable as a result of the increase in effective impedance under certain operating conditions. When the series impedance increases, primary current is reduced. When the power available from the secondary coil either remains the same or increases as the primary circuit impedance increases, a power gain occurs. his is not possible with a series resonant circuit made of conventional materials. #ven unity power transfer is considered to be unattainable as a result of accumulated losses in the components, which are passive (reactive) devices. Materials and construction methods are chosen for these components based upon the type of application and fre&uency to be applied, with the goal of minimi'ing losses. A typical capacitor with polyethylene dielectric has a dielectric constant of 8.- times air. Air has a constant of /.., and is the basis for comparison. itanium dio3ide, however, has a dielectric constant ma3imum of /;., and a corresponding power factor of only .....9, comparable with polyethylene, so that the dissipation of primary current in the dielectric is e3tremely low. his is where the comparison ends, because the titanium composite 1capacitor1 is also a pie'oelectric device as well as an e3cellent capacitor. (eat adversely affects the power factor of most dielectric materials. itanium 'irconate, however, contains polar molecules which rotate as thermal pressure is applied. his rotation increases the dielectric constant if the fre&uency applied is e&ual to or lower than the resonant fre&uency of the dielectric. At series resonance, the rotation of polar molecules contributes to heat? as the dielectric constant increases, a corresponding release of free electrons occurs, as a direct result of the pie'oelectric properties of the device. *n application, the MRA is tuned at resonance for ma3imum power transfer, then detuned slightly for ma3imum power gain. his relates directly to the use of thermal

pressure at resonance, and the effect that this has on continued polar rotation and the release of donor electrons. he coil, or primary of the MRA is a magnetic core which relative to the fi3ed capacitance of the pie'o, is a tuned permeability device. his is often used in R< devices to attain a stable resonant fre&uency. Magnetic materials are chosen based upon the operating characteristics of the intended application to reduce eddy currents in the operating range. *n these applications, the resonant fre&uency of the magnet itself is avoided, as this would 1beat1 with the oscillating current. (owever, in the MRA, this is the e3act effect which we want. he barium ferrite magnet resonates audibly at fre&uencies which are harmonics of the series resonant fre&uency. he effect of this in a typical audio application is called harmonic distortion, and is not desirable, but once again, in the MRA, this is what we want to occur. here is energy in the harmonics, and this energy serves to both counter eddy losses as well as to oppose primary current flow, while contributing to circulating current within the resonant circuit. he net effect of this, is that when the MRA is detuned, harmonics of the audible fre&uency 1beat1 with primary current, opposing its flow, while the increase in circulating current couples more power to the secondary, and therefore to the load. is how the power gain is attained, basically by considering the naturally occurring harmonics as beneficial instead of as undesirable effects to be filtered out.

his

When the MRA is detuned, the effective impedance increases as seen by the source, while the power available to the load decreases in less proportion. his is measurable by using resistive e&uivalent circuit testing. (owever, the detuning is load dependent, and slight ad)ustments are re&uired if the load re&uirement is greater than the power band of a harmonic interaction. After retuning, the power to the will increase in &uantum intervals as the circulating current is reinforced by the reaction of the permeable magnet core. his will be seen as slight incremental voltage increases across the load device. 0nce the magnet is 1ringing1, it6s fre&uency and therefore harmonics remain stable, as long as the series resonant range is not e3ceeded. herefore, the detuning affects the pie'o only, and the circulating current increase is a result of the phase relationship between the harmonic and the source. @oltage amplification is seen across the primary, measurable higher than the source voltage, and this is 1seen1 by the secondary. his is not the same thing as a power gain, because the power gain is a direct result of effective impedance. *t should also be noted that the term 1virtual rotation1 has been applied in describing the operation of the MRA. he comparison is made with a generator, in which relative motion occurs between a coil and magnet. Rather than use physical energy to rotate a mass, the MRA uses resonance to rotate the energy. his is seen in the polar rotation of the pie'o dielectric as well as in the molecular energy occurring in the reactive component of the magnet, i.e., the ringing. he lattice structures of the pie'o and magnet are compatible for virtual rotation, and the materials complement each other electrically.

*n the past, researchers have noted many effects which occur at aggregate resonance, which typically includes a range of three octaves. Anomalous energy gains were referred to as 1aetheric1. he aether was believed to e3ist outside of the three physical dimensions, and could be 1tapped1 for free energy at resonance. Aetheric energy is said to be limitless, but to vary locally with increases in earth magnetic fields at sunset and sunrise, li!e the tides of an infinite ocean. his effect is not thoroughly understood, but has been observed in the MRA, as increases in output in the early morning, and decreases in the early evening. his is still being studied. #3perimentation will determine the optimum MRA design for a specific range of applications. Message JJ97 (/8D/;DJ7 /7B-/) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA Cill L 5es "oel and * both have echtronic scopes and <lu!e 2; true RMG meters to cross chec! all measurements and so far we cannot find the 1flaw1 in the test procedure if there is one. he only real test is 1independent verification1 which will be done by (al Authoff and "ohn down in Austin. *f you saw "erry6s message to me, * will be sending Walter Rosenthal a complete running circuit for a second verification along with a complete set of all the message traffic and 1 ech Culletins1 to date. "oel and * have done all we can do as to verification due to not having some very advanced e&uipment. he ne3t step is on the wor! bench in the form of a voltage regulator stage, an oscillator stage and a M0G<# driver stage to drive the front end of the circuit so we can run it 1stand alone1. L %orm Message JJ99 (/8D/;DJ7 /:B7:) <romB Cill Ceaty oB All Gub)ectB mra pie'o sourceK he (QR catalog has >#A+ H*R,0%A # * A%A # pie'os, /.:1 by /D/.1, :.!h'. hin! it6ll wor!K Message JJ9; (/8D/;DJ7 /2B/;) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA Cill L 5es, those transducers will wor! but they are physically smaller than the ones we are using * figure when this circuit is verified that the ne3t step will be to go to a natural &uart' milled wafer of the natural fre& we desire to same as the crystals used in transmitters e3cept a lot larger. *f you have access to a homas +irectory at wor!, please loo! up Cranson who ma!es the ultrasonic welders so we can get a source manufacturer from them. Maybe someone on the *nternet will !now the manufacturers of these transducers. his circuit is a mindbender when you study its characteristics. <or e3ample * started off this morning (after * let the circuit run all night to condition the magnet and pie'o crystal) with a total over-unity power gain of /.9:B/ ratio. After playing with the circuit all day ta!ing measurements after each ad)ustment or change of operating parameters, arrived at a /:.B/ *D0 ratio. (ere are the figuresB *nput /:.-7

@A, R :7.J $(H with .:; Ma which is ....2;7 Watts which has to be ad)usted for power factor by multiplying by .;.;. he output isB /9.;: @+, R ;2.2 Ma into a pure resistive load. his figures out to be greater than a /:.B/ *D0 ratio. * guess you have figured out how e3cited everyone is over this 1Fadget1. %ow unless 0(MG law has been nullified or there is some 1spoo!1 phenomenon that "oel and * cannot find then we have the / watt challenge in the bag by a wide margin. More as we learn more. L %orm Message JJ28 (/8D/2DJ7 /.B/-) <romB %orman Wootan oB All Gub)ectB MRA ( ech Culletin) * !now that there are &uit a few fol!s out there running around digging up parts to build a MRA device to do independent testing. >et me share with you some findings that will assist all in this approach. <irst disregard the measurements that * gave Cill Ceaty yesterday in a message about power gain. * li!e "oel find myself bac! at 1s&uare one1. *t happens li!e this, when you have this circuit up on the 1ragged edge1 where the first harmonic seems to be phase 1beating1 or attenuating the input current and providing potential only to drive the first stage resonance in the transducer, you disconnect the load to do the only accurate total power consumption test which is 1e&uivalent resistance1 measurements so we can nail down the elusive power figure according to 0(MG >AW. Well when you unload the circuit under the optimum operating conditions the transducers will immediately trip into a very powerful mechanical oscillations around 8$(' and self destruct in short order and at the same time put out a violent voltage that can soar above /... @A, which in turn will literally wipe out your driving amplifier and your fre&uency counter. <ortunately the scope is better protected on the front end. Go what * am saying is that you begin all over conditioning a new set of driver transducers which even fresh out of the bo3 will display over-unity output in the circuit. he people over at the manufacturing firm that ma!es these transducers are 1smiling1 and calling their stoc! bro!er to e3ercise some stoc! options in their product for * see a lot of you destroying a bunch of transducers in the process of testing and improving the circuit. >et me share with you some ideas. When * go bac! and read 0M C#AR+#%G wor!s about potentiali'ing a circuit without the attendant circuit that is normally involved we will have achieved the over-unity that we are see!ing. After careful study of the MRA * can see how this device can be separated into two separate devices. <irst the pie'o is a source of high fre& potential which at - octaves above drive the ferro-resonant primary coil at the natural resonant fre& of the magnetic material. %ow * believe * have figured out the secret behind the Gwiss M-> ,onverter !nown as the #G A@*G A *$A or #G A *$A for short. his device was developed in the group called M# (#R%# A by Aaul Caumann and it has been seen by our friend Gtephan Marinov. his HA# tapping can be accomplished through potential being derived from any source such as the electrostatic charge developed in the Wimhurst type generator. he secret is in the MAF%# *, R#G0%A%,# AMA>*<*#R. $en Ghoulders and R.A. <ord demonstrated that what we term as harmless energy (electrostatic charge) when stored in a large capacitor is real charge separation and can do some interesting things such as e3ploding water, wire and other interesting research pro)ects. *f we ta!e advantage of the mechanical oscillations of the transducer and operate it at a level of mechanical resonance (in free oscillation) that will optimi'e the voltage output (lets say 7.. volts) which in turn we use to drive the ferro-resonant barium ferrite core coil then we can e3tract some serious power from the coil providing

that we have done our homewor! and provided the optimum impedance matching and tuning of the circuit to ma3imi'e the final product. We are a long ways from our final goal of having a unit that we can flip a switch and the thing will run 1stand alone1. "oel and * have ta!en the first step by sharing with you our findings so let6s wor! this thing out together as a 1)oint pro)ect1. We will share all findings in these ech Culletins so everyone is on the same sheet of music. %ow for some 1spoo!1 type anomalies that occur around this circuit when it is running in the HA# tapping mode which is where we purposely de-tune the circuit upward in fre& so that we get the 1beating1 effect from the first harmonic. When you see this on the scope it will appear as the sine wave pattern of the input being bro!en into little line segments by an invisible or transparent oscillation at a much higher fre& than the primary driving signal which in the case of my circuit is around :9.2 $('. #ven when * have ,h 8 turned on with no signal (base line only) it also is bro!en into short line segments as if the electron beam is driven into cut off by this invisible signal. Any R< engineers out there seen thisK Alease e3plain same. * believe that all the phenomenon that is being observed by people such as Gweet, Aspden, Adams, >ambertson, Gearl and om Cearden are all connected by a common thread. >et6s 1unravel it1. L %orm Message JJ2- (/8D/2DJ7 //B.-) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) Gub)ectB Aie'os are fragile (i "erry L he pie'os, for all of their :. watt capability, are fragile, especially along the edges. * had mine soldered at the edges, and when it bumped into the magnet while in transport, it crac!ed. he pie'o has to be free to vibrate... if you touch it while the MRA is running, you can watch your output drop off, so it6s a &uestion of finding a way to mount them 1loose1, yet protected. (owever, whoever accidently pic!ed up my stapled pac! of tech notes might let me !now so * can pic! them up... has all of the test data and correspondence with (al, and was on the corner of the table. (A%$GII L "oel Message JJ27 (/8D/2DJ7 //B/-) <romB %orman Wootan oB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) Gub)ectB MRA (eyII "erry, +on Gmith is right all the way. >et me e3plain --- he has basically the same circuit that we ("oel and *). *n his circuit he is using a esla coil as the driver and trying to e3tract power in his secondary from the 1feeble1 bac!ground earth magnetic field. *f +on had been privy to what "oel and * !now (now everyone) then he could have incorporated into his circuit a powerful barium ferrite magnet which he could drive at its resonant fre& and effectively do the same thing we are doing. *n fact the esla coil instead of the transducer is a much better driving potential. *t is inherently much more stable with much higher potentials being able to be achieved and the fact remains that the HA# tapping occurs in the domains of the magnet in 1@irtual Rotation1. houghts "erry and "oelK L %orm Message JJ2: (/8D/2DJ7 //B::) <romB "oel Mc,lain

oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB iger by the tail (i %orm L Gorry to hear that you also blew up your input amplifier. We6ve got a very powerful tiger by a very short tail with the MRA. *t6s purpose is to give power gain by buc!ing input current while using circulating current to drive the load, and this is done in a tuned, balanced state. As we6ve seen, unbalancing the MRA by removing the load can cause the 1buc!ing1 current to run open and blow up 7. to :. watt amplifiers...with no other power applied. #ven the flu3 from it blew up my panel mount +@M. Well, the good news is that we are over unity... the bad news is that we will have to cage the beast somehow. L "oel Message /..-- (/8D/JDJ7 /.B79) <romB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB (R) MRA (i %ormD"oel, et. al L "ust got a call from om Cearden... (e6s e3cited and even though * sent the MRA to him last wee!, he wants it today...so * am fa3ing it...along with the MRA/ and the 4" 0G, (Woody6s 4" oscillator file) because he can use all of it. As to the fracturing, he says this is due to pumping the potential field and went into a long e3planation that * don6t remember half of....he says his paper on stepped charging of the capacitors warns of this and they still haven6t figured out how to get around it... (e says they have transients e3ceeding -... volts and have smo!ed several test instruments on their end also... (e says to be sure and warn Rosenthal of this before he trashes some of that very e3pensive stuff he will use... om says because the anomalies in such circuits are so radically different from normal electromagnetics, to prevent or at the very least A #MA to minimi'e damage to their test devices and circuits.. hey have adopted the approach of discrete charging only up to fi3ed levels... *t is everyone6s desire to get the ma3 power out, but not at the e3pense of blown e&uipment, ruptured parts or circuits that burn out, so he thin!s once the grad students and others start getting into it, they will wor! convergently (as everyone here does) to come up with the bottom line details of what wor!s, what doesn6t and what will produce anomalous effects... Go, * have to get those fa3es to him now, again, he said he is G0 @#R5 A>#AG#+ that everyone is wor!ing so well together and that the information is being so freely shared... L "erry Message /..7/ (/8D/JDJ7 /8B/.) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cert Aool Gub)ectB MRA at preamp signal input (i Cert L At the meeting, you were tal!ing about energi'ing an MRA with low level signal input, so * gave it a try with a wea! stereo preamp. he input to the MRA was ..:98@A, and /./ma for 9.8mw of input power. he output power is only 8.8mw. After an hour, the input power power dropped off to 7.8mw as the circuit e&uivalent resistance increased from :/. ohms to /..$ ohms, and the output power stayed the same at 8.8mw, but this is still only half of unity. #ven given more hours of test, * don6t thin! it will ma!e unity. *t6s possible that the wea! potential and resulting current are not enough to create the flu3 density and pie'o effect that we need. L "oel

Message /..:7 (/8D/JDJ7 8/B/7) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB (R) MRA ------- /.J.vac R -7.//$(' (i %orm, S sig S-----------S S S 4sing this circuit in the MRA S gen S S *6ve been able to measure the -------------primary current without the S ref A MT pie'o effects of the voltage multiS -------plication or the inductance of S S ref C wire wound resistors. S S S U 2 ohm comp. With the 2 ohm resistor wired S D resistor between the pie'o and primary S U and measuring from the return S D side at ref A to ref C and to S S ref , ref ,, and subtracting them, S S you have the voltage drop for S . calculating series current. S . primary S . winding * have //./:vac at ref C and S . //./.vac at ref , for ..:. S S drop, D2 = ...98: amps, times ---------------/.J.vac for //.Jmw. 0n the output (not shown) is :.2.vac across 9.. ohm resistive load for current of J.;ma and power of :9mw. Fain is :9D//.J = 7.99 times unity. Alease try this and let me !now what you get. L "oel Message /..:J (/8D8.DJ7 .;B::) <rom B %orman Wootan oB "ames (artmann Gub)ectB MRA D Fravity "ames L We have your spea!er levitation e3periment on the net as a file. A couple of days ago someone mentioned the harmonic rich wave form of the MRA as being the same as your output from the 1distortion amp1 when you were getting the levitation effect with the correct fundamental fre& applied. All goes bac! to $eely with the multiple fre& discord causing anomolous gravity effects. Gure wish you luc! in the pursuit of follow-up info on the #nglish report. With the %eiper Ring pro)ect we will need as much info as possible to achieve full anti-grav effects. L %orm Message /..;/ (/8D8.DJ7 /7B.7) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB #->ine ests

(i %orm L * li!e the idea of using the solid state amps to measure current differentials. *6ve tried to measure the difference in A, current to the sig gen by measuring the voltage drop across a 8 ohm resistor in series with line to the sig gen. #ven with a Gola, there is more line variation than the ..../@A, difference in drop that would e&ual the entire output power of the MRA. (.../D8 N //J.8@A, = 9.mw). Go, measuring input power in this way is out of the &uestion. L "oel Message /..J. (/8D8/DJ7 .7B/2) <romB Cill Ceaty oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB fractured traces 0n your strange oscilloscope resultsB * see this often, when the chopping fre&uency gets close to the fre&uency being triggered upon. *f you are seeing these segmented traces when the scope is in A> #R%A # triggering (or on a single channel scope) then it is real. Cut the chopper on a dual trace scope can easily create moving line segments of various !inds without anything weird going on. (0h, * meant that * see it often at wor!, when doing fre&uency sweeps on circuitry) . Message /..J7 (/8D8/DJ7 .;B-J) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB (R) MRA Another interesting thing that we verified tonight was that the natural ferro-magnetic fre&uency is appro3imately /;7.J $('. his is a shot in the dar! from my failing memoryB * remember reading in my collection of one device that wor!ed at /7.; $('. * don6t remember then name of it for sure, but it was the one made with the large bas!et weave coils ((endershot maybeK), you6ve probably seen the thing it is one of the common lead gen devices in this field./;7.J $(' D /8 = /7.:;: $('. /7:;: D /J77 = ;.7J (' puts it down around the Gchuman range. A harmonic interaction with the #arth fieldK his could account for the time of day effects. +o you note significant changes at Gun Get and Gun RiseK Maybe this is significant, maybe it is notK Message /..J9 (/8D8/DJ7 .2B//) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cob Aaddoc! Gub)ectB MRA Cob L 5es, as "oel has mentioned several times in the message base, we do get variations in the output of the MRA at morning and evening testing. (ighest output is early morning as the sun is coming up. * agree with your magnetic fre&s for * have read many different theories each with a different fre& associated. "oel and * feel that we have it narrowed down through better evidence than previous researchers. We will soon !now for sure with a few more test that we have in mind. Will !eep you posted. 5es, Alease send the 1(arris ,atalog1, %orman Wootan, A.0. Co3 /7/.7J, +allas N ;:8/7. *6ll see that Cert has access to it for he is the circuit 1Furu1. >oves to play on the soldering bench. * would li!e to get your comments on the /8@+, powered audio amp test we did where the total current draw went down from an idle draw reading to a reading with the MRA in the circuit. +o you have reasonable e3planation for this. "oel

says that this little Radio Ghac! Gtereo booster 7.W amp is 1class ,1 therefore can only go up on current draw when a load is applied. *f idle +, current draw is -77 Ma and goes down to /J8 Ma when the MRA is attached then what are we seeing. Ghould we attach a thermocouple to the output transistors to see if they are ma!ing 1ice1K hat is the only phenomenon that we have not found that is usually associated with HA# type devices. <or those that are new to the HA# or 1Gpace @acuum tapping1 scene there have been numerous reports of over-unity type devices that usually have one or more of the following phenomenon associated with their operation. (/) 0ver-unity output of energy of some sort whether it be heat, electrical, mechanical or light. (8) Weight loss, antigravity tendencies. (-) ,ooling in the immediate area or in the device itself. "oel and * would appreciate any and all comments. L %orm Message /..JJ (/8D8/DJ7 //B77) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB MRA Anomalies #ight days ago, the MRA was invented. Almost immediately, it began to e3hibit overunity characteristics. (owever, there have also been a lot of 1&uir!y1 effects...each ta!en separately might have been test e&uipment error or technician error. (owever, these effects are forming familiar patterns now...familiar but not always predictable. he toll in dead and damaged test e&uipment so far is one panel mount +@M, one fre&uency counter, two audio amplifiers, and numerous 9.watt light bulbs. Gometimes, when supplying the MRA from a /8@+, powered audio amp, the battery current will decrease compared to the battery current to the amp with no load at all, and at the same time, amp output voltage will increase...ta!en together, this indicates that the MRA is feeding energy bac! into the amp. >ater, with no changes to the circuit, the MRA will behave li!e a normal load, and cause a small increase in battery current with a small decrease in amp output voltage. he voltage and current waveforms loo! li!e dotted lines, where each dot and space segment is e&ual to /;:$(', which %orm and * believe is the free running resonant fre&uency of ferrmagnetism. We have never seen this before, and for that matter, neither has anyone else that we6ve tal!ed to about it. #ven with nothing on ,hannel C of the 6scope, the display will e3hibit the dotted line effect whenever the MRA is running and connected to ,hannel A. Anything and everything in the field of the MRA is affected. Ghould the MRA6s output load become accidentally disconnected while the MRA is at resonance, an instantaneous and very powerful destructive surge will occur. * (*%$ that the MRA, by resonating a magnet at mass aggregate fre&uency, is magnetically 1lin!ing1 with everything in its field, and behaving li!e an 1energy pump1. We see this when we wal! up to it and the output from the MRA goes up, even though the MRA is hoo!ed up to a resistive load which is causing it to provide current. his also changes based upon the time of day relative to sunrise and set. o test anything, you first must isolate it... Cy virtue of the design of the MRA, it cannot be isolated. *t intrinsically lin!s itself to everything with a coil or magnetic field,

even to a &uart' wristwatch if it is in the same room. As such, we get varying power gains, and the variations seem more to be a &uestion of which test e&uipment is on the table at the time of the test. Alease bear in mind that this is a brand new circuit...as far as that goes, it6s a whole new technology. 0nce the magnet has been resonated, and then disconnected from the rest of the circuit, it will continue to provide up to 8:@A, at 9.(' using a human 1antenna1 to capture ambient energy in the room. >ast night, %orm and * were measuring over-unity gains of 8N--N, but we don6t really !now for sure if we were 1pumping1 the energy electromagnetically out of the test e&uipment, house wiring, earth6s magnetic field, the ether, or some combination of the above. We need some independent testing by individuals with awareness of the anomalies mentioned in this message. here is obviously a lot of power 1in flu31 which collapses into the MRA if the load is removed, so there will probably be more e&uipment lost. here is also a whole area of gravitic anomalies to investigate, because the pie'o will weigh measurably less when it is in the MRA circuit, and regain the weight when it is disconnected. he original MRA is being sent out for engineering review, from which we hope to learn more, but the more voices that are heard from, the better our chances of finding out what is really happening. L "oel Message /./.- (/8D8/DJ7 /8B8J) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB Addendum to MRA Anomalies *f the MRA6s gain is caused by 1pumping1 energy from the test e&uipment, house wiring and earth6s magnetic field due to electromagnetic lin!age, would that be the same as 1wireless electricity1K esla used the same fre&uency which is affecting our oscilloscope trace. Gince the MRA is sensitive to sunsetDsunrise, is it then going to e3hibit higher gains at ley lines and grid intersectionsK With more power applied, will the MRA achieve 'ero gravityK Why do we only see the #<<#, of /;:$(' on the scope, and not the waveformK *s it scalar energy being translated by the scopeK *f the MRA is lin!ing with earth6s magnetic field, how can we isolate test e&uipment, or for that matter, anything else on earth from itK Gend all answers and any light bulbs you can spare to "oel Q %orm. Message /./.7 (/8D8/DJ7 /7B//) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB (R) MRA Cert wants more info on the 1indestructible1 transistors you mentioned. ,all up Ape3 Microtechnology and as! them for a data boo!B 2..-:79-AA#N. hey ma!e driver *,D0A amps that will run on PD- 9..@+, (/8..@+, total swing) at .:A, and other power parts. hey also have some parts that are speced to /:,...@DuG +vD+t. +vD+t maybe what is burning up things rather than the absolute voltage. Gome parts might be able to handle /,...@+, but 0%>5 if rises slow enough, to fast a rise and you6ve got

toasted parts. ,hec! out the app notes in the bac! of the boo! on such things. he bad news are these things cost VC*FV buc!s (E-.-E:..), but can still be a bargain when you considered the system e&uivalents that they replace. <irst this bad news the following part does %0 appear in the /JJ7 data boo! (bad sign)B <rom the 4nitrode /JJ. data boo!B 1 he 4nitrode 4,/J:D4,-J: family of devices are ultra reliable, fast, monolithic power transistors with complete overload protection. he devices act as high gain power transistor and have on chip, current limiting, power limiting, and thermal overload protection, ma!ing them virtually impossible to destroy1. +oesn6t loo! li!e that will help much since we can6t get them. *6m still trac!ing down the %.G. part, they sold off their transistor division. And * have the indestructible audio amp data sheets on order. Another company in the power area is Guperte3 *nc? 7.2-;77-./... *6ll !eep loo!ing for 1indestructible1 parts.... Message /.//8 (/8D8/DJ7 /2B-.) <romB %orman Wootan oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB MRA "oel L he MRA is as we spea! on a <#+-#N flight to ,alifornia going to Walter Rosenthal for the independent testing. Maybe you could write up some input and set up guidelines for Walter so as to assist his testing effort. After all this is your hand built version. *f you would, run a few test runs on my 1monster1 MRA and we will send it to (al down in Austin or we could simply )ust wind another e3actly your original so they both would be testing identical units. What do you thin!K L %orm AGB *6M waiting for an e3planation as to why the overall current draw went down on my MRA when we tried the /8@+, amp test. he :.Ma rise was on your version. Remember we bro!e off the test when we got 1negative1 numbers. 1*nfinity Fain1 L %orm Message /.//- (/8D8/DJ7 /JB8-) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB +aniel (ill Gub)ectB (R) MRA (i +aniel L *f we need RMG power for comparison with, for e3ample, changes in the input power, yes we use the constant multiplier of ..;.;, which is in the file info that we provided. Whether this is the e3act phase angle for this circuit, without vector analysis, we don6t !now. he reason why we can6t be sure is that we are vectoring harmonics for the e3press purpose of altering the effective impedance of the circuit. his is %0 what they teach at +e@ry, but it is how it wor!s. (owever, the world accepts the cosine of theta at ..;.; as the normal A, circuit power factor multiplier, so we use it. o the e3tent that the calculated output power performs the correct amount of wor!, such as driving a motor, it is as close as we can determine to be accurate. L "oel Message /.//9 (/8D8/DJ7 88B.2) <romB %orman Wootan oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB MRA

"oel L Fremlins are bac! at wor!. * started to ta!e the power amp bac! to Radio Ghac! today but decided to do a test on it first. Flad * did for it healed itself. Remember what * said about my circuit shutting down and would do nothingK Well * thin! this MRA builds a field up around it and blan!s out some e&uipment. he amp is 0$ now and operating )ust fine. onight * was running a new MRA li!e your original and suddenly it shut down and * could not get any output from the secondary no matter how much * increased the input to the pie'o. he only way * solved the problem was to swap sides on the circuit, in other words swap the output leads over to the input and vice versa then it too! off running again. Flad this is a /B/ turn ratio winding. his a really weird device that will ta!e some getting use to. L %orm Message /./-/ (/8D88DJ7 /7B89) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB est of the 1monster1 MRA (i %orm L ested the 1monster1 MRA with two magnets, large coils and four pie'os. <irst tested it with low power from the sig gen only, then with the amplifier. Gince the pie'os were in parallel, * tested both parallel and series connections. Also tested )ust the transformer, with no pie'os. he transformer alone is )ust under unity (half of one percent difference in power) at /77.:$('. With all of the pie'os in the circuit, the power out ratio dropped off. <ound that the best gain was with only one pie'o, which added /.8O over unity with the sig gen alone, and //.2O with the amplifier. * used a regulated /8@+, /.A power supply to power the amplifier, so that there would be no chance of current dropping off as load was added, and found that the additional drain to the supply with the MRA connected was 7.ma. *t too! /2. ohms of e&uivalent load on the output of the amp to produce the same 7.ma increase, so the MRA 1loo!s li!e1 /2. ohms to the output of the amp. hat is the effective impedance of the MRA, which we can use to determine current and power into the MRA. With J.;-@A, output from the amp at /2. ohms, and /2.2@A, from the MRA at 9.. ohms, we have -;8mw RMG into the MRA and 7/9mw RMG out, which is /./8 times unity. * thin! that the reason why the gain isn6t higher is that the difference between ma3 power out of the MRA and ma3 power gain of the MRA is too wide of a spread in fre&uency. We used 2:O as a 1rule of thumb1 with the first MRA, but this one re&uires ;.O change, which puts us on the edges of the resonant range, and we lose much of the power of the harmonics. *6m not sure whether this is a result of using two magnets or more wire or a combination of the two, but the best power gains seem to occur where the fre& spread between ma3 power and ma3 gain is less. We6ll have to e3periment with number of turns on a single magnet to find the 1sweet spot1... no pun intended. L "oel Message /./-8 (/8D88DJ7 /:B-/) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Answering as many &uestions as possible in one message.

Cob - 5our guru is right. he current drop was seen on a +@M, and is li!ely caused by a meter error as a result of the surge at power-on. Also, a drop in input voltage would naturally cause a corresponding drop in input current, so we are using a ten amp regulated supply to avoid that pitfall. he current increases by 7.ma after the initial surge, as measured on an analog meter. Michael - he aggregate resonant fre&uency is between -7$(' and -:$(', although we found the resonant fre&uency of the magnet to be around 2$(' to //$('. he /;7.J$(' is what we believe to be the resonant fre&uency of ferromagnetism, based upon esla6s e3periments and some of our own. We don6t see this in the circuit on an oscilloscope, but we see wave chopping at this rate. Cill - he signals which we are inputting and e3tracting are all sinusoidal. We6re using battery power as much as possible, although the sig gen is A, powered, and we6ve had to use a /8@+, supply to avoid battery drops during measurements. *6m not sure what the retrace or refresh rates are for this scope, but it should be higher than /;:$(' on a 2.M(' scope, * would guess. 5es, * !now how the 1observer effect1 is interpreted in mainstream science, e3cept for the fol!s who wor! at particle accelerators who have both seen and documented it. here is an 1interconnectedness of all things1, but once it6s measurable, mainstream science )umps all over it. Fod bless them, every one. Gince the 1original recipe1 MRA has been sent out for engineering analysis, we6ll have to wait until its return before we can use it for more tests. L "oel Message /./-7 (/8D88DJ7 /;B/.) <romB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB (R) Addendum to MRA Anomalies (i Cill L hat6s some real food for thought that has applications with a gravity wave detector circuit....it too could be driven over an area and the field mapped to produce a topology... ownsend Crown did this bac! in the 7.6s * thin! on a %avy submarine... "ames (artman sent me a copy of the boo! with the details...nothing spectacular but it definitely showed gravitic anomalies, way before the 6mascons6 discovered on the lunar surface... e3cellent idea CillI L "erry Message /./-2 (/8D88DJ7 /;B7J) <romB %orman Wootan oB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) Gub)ectB ,apacitor ,harging in MRA <ield "erry L * have been thin!ing about the thread that you and * had going bac! in the summer about how capacitors could be charged by dropping them or spinning them. Well, "oel and * are going to do some cap charging test via the MRA fields. *f we are getting this anomalous energy fields that will show up to 8;@A, on a meter with everything turned off it is possible to use the device as a passive tuned energy collector. Gort of li!e esla6s ,osmic Ray ,onverter in which he charged capacitors and drove simple motor devices. Worth a few hours of test setup. L %orm

Message /./7/ (/8D88DJ7 8/B.J) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) Gub)ectB (R) Addendum to MRA Anomalies (i "erry L han! you... * didn6t pic! up on the implications, so glad you did. 5ou !now, the first g-wave detector that * built went nuts when that last big earth&ua!e hit "apan. *t was the electrolytic capacitor with a ;7; and a small pie'o spea!er. Maybe the MRA could be monitored by someone in ,A ne3t to a seismograph to see if it can correlate tectonic activity with gravity fluctuations...maybe even help give some warning in advance. *t would be worth it )ust for that alone. *ncreases in solar wind as a result of solar flares might also be detected in time to shift power lines to avoid power failures. Actually, if the MRA is made directional, it could detect any large energy shift from any source, because they are all reflected on the earth grid at near light speed. (ere in e3as, we could 1see1 tornadoes forming. Might )ust be the early warning system for all natural (and unnatural) occasions. Message /./;8 (/8D8-DJ7 8.B:/) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB he -.. turn secondary and 9.W bulbs here was an error in message W /./72...the MRA tested today was made by %orm for test, and has a two to one step up ratio, i.e., /:. turns on the primary, -.. turns on the secondary. <rom what * can measure, this is superior to the original one-to-one ratio of the first MRA, which * wound to test theory. Ma!es sense though, because as the magnet inhales energy, the more secondary you have, the more energy will be collected for the load. Also, have noticed that when light bulbs (ordinary 9.W bulbs) blow, they do so with great vigor and a brighter than normal flash. he filament is e3ploded off of its posts, and flies around the inside of the bulb with enough force to leave striations on the glass. *n the past, * have associated this with an accumulation of virtual particles on the neutral lines of the house (from other e3periments). his accumulation causes the lines to superconduct when a light switch is turned on, because the neutral is no longer neutral but at an elevated virtual potential. he effect is the same. L "oel Message /./;: (/8D8-DJ7 88B.2) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA Cill L Gince you have been such a valuable asset to us in getting out the word to the *nternet and ,ompuserve * am going to send to you an 1original1 pie'o and magnet of the type that we are using in our MRA devices. As you have seen by "oel6s message prior to this one he has run test on one of my 8B/ ratio MRA units. * have built 9 MRA6s to date and all have displayed over-unity to differing degrees. * have been playing with

different configurations of magnets and winding ratios while "oel is doing the 1hard core1 testing. (ec! most of my e&uipment is out at his house. "ust !idding fro we have duplicate of all test e&uipment and so does Cert Aool in our group. his way we all three can build independent of one another and compare results. "oel is sending the 8B/ ratio MRA that * built to (arold Authoff down in Austin for additional testing while Walter Rosenthal is testing the original MRA out in ,alifornia. * will get your care pac!age off to you uesday along with a document that * want you to post to *nternet. L %orm Message /./;9 (/8D8-DJ7 8-B:9) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty (i Cill L * don6t thin! that all combinations of pie'o and magnet types will wor!. he evolution in the original design was first, the resonating of a magnet, and determining the resonant range of the magnet, and second, adding a pie'o which would resonate three octaves above the magnet. he magnets which we are using will 1sing1 a pure tone at )ust over 2$(', and double that is /9$(', and double that is -8$('. he fre&s that we are applying to our MRAs is beween -7 and -:$('. his is also )ust below the pea! resonant range of the pie'os which we are using, and which were originally designed for ultrasonic welding. he lattice structure of the pie'o and magnet should also be compatible in order to get the harmonics... cube lattices, which are nested tetrahedrons. <irst wind a primary and secondary around your magnet, and apply a variable fre&uency to the primary while watching the secondary on a scope or high fre& meter. Where the secondary output pea!s, you have the resonant fre& for the magnet. 4se that to find a pie'o which has a resonant range three octaves higher. he easiest thing would be for you to use the same parts that we are using...they have already been found to be harmonious. *f you want to e3periment with what you have available, that6s fine too, and may yield more and better results, or at least useful data on which combinations don6t wor! until you find one that does. 5ou will have to !eep your mass aggregate fre& well below /..$(', or you will be above the alpha cutoff fre& of audio 3istors and diodes...you won6t be able to get +, out, in other words. >et us !now what you want to do. L "oel Message /./22 (/8D87DJ7 //B8.) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA as a 1solar1 device (i Cill L As Aaul (arvey would say, now here6s the 1rest of the story1 on the MRA as an energy pump. he energy source is the earth magnetic field, which gets its power from the combination of rotation and solar wind from the sun, so the MRA is technically a solar power device. As the MRA 1warms up1, it is e3tending its vorte3 upward and 1lin!ing1 with layered fields of the atmosphere. At each lin! point, you will see the MRA output increase by a specific &uantum interval. he MRA is attracting the electromagnetic energies, and funneling them bac! to the magnet, through the coils, which couple a portion of the energy to the load. 0ther

conductors which are in the path of the vorte3 also collect energy, specifically the neutral wires. 5ou can reduuce the output of the MRA by detuning it, and within a few hours, the output will be bac! up as a result of the &uantum lin!ed increases, and regardless of the energy applied to drive the MRA6s oscillations. C W, the MRA does have ma3 output when the coils are aligned with magnetic north and south...and drops off when the coils are aligned toward east and west. 5ou are going to have a >0 of fun with thisI L "oel Message /./J/ (/8D87DJ7 /8B/2) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB MRA has a 6magic s&uare6 (i %orm L * (*%$ that we have a 6magic s&uare6 relationship with the magnet, because when it was resonated in the 6monster6 test, it was almost at unity (with no pie'o) at /77.:$('. *f we divide /77.: by /;.:, we get 2.8:$(', and three octaves up is the mass aggregate fre&uency of the MRA. Why divide by /;.:K Cecause it is the $h' multiple of /;:$(', the ferroresonant fre&uency. Another piece of the pu''le is now in place. L "oel Message /./J8 (/8D87DJ7 /8B-7) <romB %orman Wootan oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB MRA "oelB * built a second 8B/ ratio MRA and began testing this morning after conditioning the magnet and pie'o through the night. Well here are the numbers that by the way have all been verified via scope measurements in addition to meter readingsB *nput? R -7-97 (H, /.-2: @A, R ..../9;A for an output of 7.2J@+, into /.,... 0(M load R ....7--A on which * have applied no A< correction on the input which according to my calculations yields a J./2B/ power gain. ,hec! the figures and comments are welcome. here seems to be a big debate going on in various minds as to the application of the .;.; A< correction when we are not sure of the e3act nature of this circuit, i.e., do we have a capacitive leading current circuit or is it an inductive, current lagging circuitK he way * understand A< correction is that you have to !now the degree of leadDlag relationship between the voltage trace and the current trace. Am * correct or not in this statementK L %orm Message /./J7 (/8D87DJ7 /7B:.) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB he Rule of %ines...revisited (i %orm L ,onnect two MRAs together, with the output of the second connected across the primary of the first. Fet them in resonance, and then turn off the sig gen. hey will become self-resonant e3actly three octaves above the fre& that you were applying (Rule of %ines again), and the output power will go up 8..--..O. hen turn the sig gen bac! on, and see how long it ta!es to get the circuit bac! 1under control1 of the sig gen.

Cecause we are resonating each MRA at the third octave of the magnet, that means that we are at the first octave of a greater aggregate, which occurs as the free running fre&uency. hree octaves above --.;:$(' is /-:$(', the free running fre&, which is e&ual to the ferromagnetic /;:$(' minus the magnet res fre& and the pie'o res fre&. Fiven enough drive, this bird will fly. L "oel Message /.8.. (/8D8:DJ7 /-B-.) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB ,reactive #ffect he purpose of this message is to introduce a new term to describe the type of components which are used in tuned resonant devices. *n the past, 1active1 has been used to describe switching parts, such as vacuum tubes and transistors. 1Aassive1 is used to describe components such as carbon resistors, and 1reactive1 to describe coils and capacitors, which react to changes in fre&uency by altering their impedance to the flow of current. All of these devices consume power in application. %one of these apply very well to components that consume power but which also use resonance to tap the ether for e&ual or greater power than that which they consume. herefore, to fill the void in usable vocabulary, * suggest the term 1creactive1. he term implies that something is created, which is %0 the case...energy cannot be created...however, the #<<#, of actively resonating material for the RA%G>A *%F of energies gives the appearance of creating energy. he components are not creactive unless and until they are in the process of creating the effect. his should not be too confusing, as the same relationship e3ists with other components. A coil, for e3ample, has no impedance...only resistance...to +, current. *t is passive to +,, and reactive to A,. *f anyone has a better terms to suggest, or sees any technical problem with 1creactive1, please let me !now. han!sI Message /.8.J (/8D89DJ7 /.B.;) <romB "ames "ohnson oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB ,hopped Gine Wave %orm, last month * was plotting sine waves using Mathcad trying to determine what $eely was doing with his destructive use of harmonics. *t appeared to me that he was subtracting out the -rd, Jth, 8;th, 2/st, 87-rd Q etc. harmonics from the /st harmonic. he 9th harmonic may have been added to create a shrin!ing effect on a molecule howeverK (e !ept saying that large impulses were being created when he was pluc!ing his strings. he fre&uencies that were creating these impulses seemed to be in the terahert' range which he deduced from his vibrating hydrogen bubbles and the refracted and reflected light waves. Anyway, while plotting numerous combinations of harmonics a pattern started to emerge that blew my mind. here appeared to be the formation of a normal low fre&uency sine wave that was being chopped into regular occurring parts. hese parts were created when large spi!es of higher fre&uencies with fast rise times would shoot up and down from the ends of each part. As each succeeding harmonic was subtracted, the amplitude of the impulses became greater. * was not able to go beyond the 87-rd harmonic because of Mathcad6s limitations in

plotting points. $eely was dealing with very high fre&uencies, even though each individual harmonic at these fre&uencies was not very powerful by itself the combined harmonics * feel produce tremendous pulses that could rip apart most any substance. here appeared also a pattern of smoothing the chopped sine wave as the higher harmonics were being subtracted. 5ou might be seeing these effects on your scope when testing the MRA circuit. he dual trace feature on the scope could be also causing trouble as already suggested. *f it is, throw the dammed thing out and use a pendulum or a pair of divining rodsI 0ne thing that !eeps popping up in Mrs. Moore6s boo! on $eely is that $eely seemed to be using segmented silver, gold and platinum wires as well as some bar stoc! attached to his devices as band pass filters. his appeared to allow him to pass selected fre&uencies to various parts of his apparatus in the proper se&uence. he idea that he produced all fre&uencies at the same time does not seem to be true. here appears to be a very definite se&uence of fre&uencies applied that created the re&uired harmonics. hose using sound boards in their computers should be aware by now that digital producing sine waves are really chun!y when dealing with high fre&uencies. he Mathcad simulation that * use really brings this home when using less points. Freat numbers of points are needed to produce the finer details that are re&uired to observe some of the above sine wave chopping. Message /./78 (/8D88DJ7 8/B82) <romB Cill Ceaty oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB MRA * wonder if your output rectifiers are a necessary part of the deviceK (ave you tried running it with an A, output and using scope measurementsK Might it still wor!K Message /./77 (/8D88DJ7 88B..) <romB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB (R) ,apacitor ,harging in MRA <ield (i %orm L Gounds li!e a great e3periment if there is truly a field present...it might even have time distortion effects as with the +eAalma claims... since the %ieper and some of ownsend Crown6s e3periments also seemed to 6dilate6 time...* never understood if it was R4>5 a time dilation or simply an impeding effect on the mechanical cloc! mechanism and that might apply to digital also via electron flow &uenching.... perhaps "oel6s %#0%+# circuit, using the neon to detect scalar type changes might be useful to 6scan6 the area around the device while in operation...and that in turn leads to the gamma emission detector used by "oe Aarr in his rotating pyramid e3periments where the energy bubble 6grew6 from the center of the $ing6s chamber... lots of permutations.... it would ma!e the most sense to stic! with the normal measurements first, then go to the spoo! field theories... a capacitor, being a stressed dielectric might be an ideal collector of such aether interferences.... * really li!e Cills idea of scanning ley lines and generating some !ind of map... * was )ust tal!ing with #ric +uchaine from ,anada and he mentioned that a geologist friend of his told him the ley lines of the planet are shifting from their position due to large crystal and other mining processes... We also discussed whether these were a MA% MA+# FR*+ that was being disrupted by a lac! of understanding or whether it was a natural grid based on the earths own geometry.... and what would be the effects once it reached a certain point of anomaly... #ric is a

storehouse of interesting information and a practicing acupuncturist who runs his own CCG...he is very with us in the same !inds of studies with an emphasis on Reich6s 0rgone... he is going to call Ronnie McWilliams about his radioactive elementDorgone stimulation e3periments... L "erry Message /./7; (/8D8-DJ7 ./B/9) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB /:. turn MRA test (i %orm L * tested the MRA which you made per the schematic with /:. turns on primary and secondary, on a single magnet. *t chec!s out at 7.9- time unity. Also, * have observed the analog current meter reading lower with the MRA in the circuit than when it is out. (ere6s the dataB (RMG) Gecondary output = /7.-@A, R 9.. ohms = 87/mw for a net change in +, current to the amp of 'ero ma. Resistive e&uivalent on the output for 'ero ma change is /-.. ohms R J.;:@A, output, so power = :8mw to the MRA. 87/mw D :8mw = 7.9- gain. When the fre& was ad)usted so that the output of the MRA was /8@A, R 9.. ohms, the input current to the amp decreased by /.ma. *t is not possible to calculate gain because this is an effective output impedance greater than infinity. Gupply voltage to the amp was //.2J volts +, from a ten amp regulated supply and did not vary at all. Gomehow, the MRA is increasing the impedance of the amp to the +, supply, possibly reducing the conduction of transistors. L "oel Message /./7J (/8D8-DJ7 ./B/2) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB +iodes (i Cill L We used a bridge rect. but that was so we could get useful wor! out of the MRA, i.e., driving a motor, a fluorescent camping lantern, etc., but for measurement purposes, A, RMG is fine...it6s sinusoidal output. L "oel Message /./:. (/8D8-DJ7 ./B7.) <romB Cill Ceaty oB All Gub)ectB internet MRA Gir L *s there a #mail address to get to one of the original people who are wor!ing this device. here are a couple of concerns * feel that need to be addressed..... /. MRA should be %MRA as what you maybe dealing with is %uclear Magnetic Resonance Amplifier. As you are flipping the Magnetic fields in the magnetic core you are producing #nergy? the &uestion is at what cost. he following simple and ine3pensive procedures may answer a few &uestions and raise many more. . *< possible introduce a low level radio active material close to you device. he radium dial on a watch or any ob)ect that glows in the dar! when e3posed to sunlight or better

yet a small amount of a radio active element... record radiation levels before and after a 87 hr e3posure to device. *n case of a glow in the dar! element determine how long it will glow before e3posure to device and than after e3posure to device. %e3t ta!e 8 e&ual amounts of water...using one as a control e3pose the other to deviceX (ave water chec!ed by a chemist for changes...(e3tra elections or ions) or lac! of also see if water is being bro!en down by electrochemical reaction with device.... . *t is my belief your device may have some rather interesting effects at low power levels and some very dangerous effects as si'e and power are increased... *t is possible to upset the balance of matter only so far before things start to happenX Materials may start changing or in some cases start coming apart in unusual ways... his device may have applications in areas other than free energy which need to be e3plored and may hold even greater promise...,onsider the possibility of reducing or using spent nuclear material or waste as a source of direct energy. #3tracting the deadly radiation and turning it into electrical energy. his may also apply to comple3 chemical chains with high atomic numbers. . As has been observed and noted by a number of people who have written about there e3perience with this device on the internet... hey feel that there is a field of influence around this ob)ect (flu3 fields, draws power from surrounding areas). Message /./:/ (/8D8-DJ7 ./B78) <romB Cill Ceaty oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB MRA testing (ere6s a couple of suggestions off the internetB +o you have measurements on the load and the current-sampling resistor valuesK +amn shame if they were mismar!ed and never chec!ed. he circuit may be altered by connecting meters to it and throwing off the resonance pea!. Go, connect everything once and ma!e simultaneous measurements. . *f you have not done so, you could put the current-sample resistor in series with the oscillator output terminal that6s grounded. hen you can ground the scope to the same terminal, use one channel to loo! at the other end of the resistor, and the other to loo! at the oscillator voltage. A separate instrument would still be needed to loo! at output voltage. . Go, any luc! with the duplicate versionsK Message /./:- (/8D8-DJ7 ./B72) <romB Cill Ceaty oB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) Gub)ectB internet arguments Go far it loo!s li!e arguing on the internet *G worthwhile. As soon as s!eptics hear that actual oscilloscopes are being used, and that the output really is +,, they start as!ing

where to get pie'osI Also, the same people who are nasty on the public newsgroups come around later via private mail wanting more info on parts. *nteresting... Message /./:9 (/8D8-DJ7 .2B:9) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA Cill L Alease relay to "ohn Croc! on *nternet the fact that since * am also e3perimenting with 1,old <usion1 and have been doing so since bac! in /J2; (before Aons Q <leischman), that * have already seen the corelationship with the 1transmutation1 that is occurring in the cold fusion cells that "ohn Coc!ris down at AQM is most e3cited about. * have a Mills %ic!el Q Aotassium ,arbonate cell running that gets cooler as it runs instead of emitting heat as normal. *f the cell is absorbing energy in an endothermic reaction then the only conclusion is that some sort of 1transmutation is ta!ing place. *t is my intent to couple the MRA effect to the 1cold <usion1 effect to determine e3actly what you are implying about 1sub atomic activity1 that we cannot at this time understand much less detect. here is so much to be learned here that it e3actly why "oel and * elected to go 1*nternet Aublic +omain1 so that researchers all over the world could apply what we have only 1s!immed the surface1 on. he implications are more far reaching that any one person can conceive of. L %orm Message /./9. (/8D8-DJ7 //B/9) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB 0(MG versus M(0G >ast night * left a message for %orm describing a decrease in current to an amplifier as having theoretical greater than infinity impedance for purposes of calculating power gain. hat has been bugging me ever since, so * went bac! to the drawing board. *n MRA theory, the phase relationship of harmonics is used to reduce the current flow from the input source. his results in a nonlinear power in S power out relationship, or ratio. his is mentioned in the file MRA/.AG, here on $eely%et. his is actually done by tuning the input fre&uency to the MRA for ma3imum A, output on its output terminals, then +#tuning the MRA for the most favorable power gain. +etuning causes powerful harmonics to oppose the flow of input current, while continuing to contribute to the circulating current in the primary coil. his alters the #<<#, *@# impedance, and gives the MRA its gain. Go far, so good. Cut what do we ma!e of it when this effective impedance causes the input power of the amp to declineK he lowest level of input, in theory, is in 1standby1 mode, with no load attached, so that in measurement terms, the amp 1sees1 a resistor of infinite ohms on its output. 4p until now, the signal input from the signal generator to the amp has not been given serious consideration because of its e3tremely low power, ../mw at the input of the amp. (owever, this signal biases the transistors in the amp. As the MRA6s output power increases, the signal at the output of the sig gen also increases, indicating that the amp6s input impedance increases directly with its input and output power. +etuning the MRA causes an e3act reversal of this process. *t was found that at -.-@A, R 9.. ohms

output from the MRA, the transistors are at only ::O conduction. Go, it is not the power from the signal source that +*R#, >5 affects output power, but the A(AG# of the input relative to the reflected phase of the harmonics from the MRA that cause the reduction in input current to the amp. * !now that this is hard to visuali'e without the e&uipment sitting in front of you, but for those who will eventually build an MRA, this information may be useful. %ow, how do we calculate gain when the input current to the amp decreases under the 1load1 of the MRAK We have to see the MRA as producing M(0G, the opposite of 0(MG (yes, M(0G e3ist in theory... *6m not ma!ing this up). +ue to the effects of interphase relationships, the load (MRA) crosses the line from being a load to being a source, and the e3tent to which it reduces amp power is gain *<< a corresponding output gain is seen or if the MRA output stays the same while input power decreases. he M(0G from the MRA, by forcing the transistors to conduct below standby levels, are using power which is 1borrowed1 from the secondary circuit. he power at the secondary is not 1free1 )ust because the input power to the amp is less than standby. he output power of the MRA also drops, so there is no gain at this point. he reduced conduction below standby crosses a threshold where the harmonic content 1cuts off its own nose1 by reducing input power below the level where harmonics are beneficial, i.e., to the point where circulating current in the primary is reduced to a level which causes unity or less gain. Cad Mhos, bad...no dessert for youI 5our comments are welcome. L "oel Message /./98 (/8D8-DJ7 /8B:-) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB (R) internet MRA (i Cill L 5es, the MRA draws power from outside of itself. hat is because the core is a magnet, and a magnet is in a constant state of collapse which is why it tries to 1pull in1 materials with similar lattice structures... to fill the energy void which was created when it was first magneti'ed. he MRA allows the magnet to attempt to restore its matterDenergy balance, or to demagneti'e itself...slowly. We are resonating the magnet and it responds by collapsing energy into itself, via the coils which pic! up this 1surplus1 energy and deliver it to a load. he total energy drawn before the magnet is no longer a magnet will be less than the energy 1stored1 in its imbalance. *f there was a 1radioactive1 reaction, it would have been immediate and very large in the original magneti'ation process, yet magneti'ing is considered to be safe. * thin! that the MRA would hurt you if you dropped it on your foot, but *6ll let that assumption ride without empirical evidence. L "oel Message /./97 (/8D8-DJ7 /:B-.) <romB "oel Mc,lain

oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB MRA #nergy Aump est (i %orm L *6ve stated here and in the MRA files that the MRA is an energy absorber, which we have seen evidenced, but which * can now prove. Get up your MRA in 2:O mode, and let it 1warm up1. hen, reset the secondary output to half of the ma3imum output voltage by further detuning the input fre&uency. Aut an aluminum foil shield over it (*6m using an old pyramid made of !ite stic!s and foil). he output will go down as the shield !eeps energy from getting to the MRA. Remove the shield, and the output goes right bac! up. Cecause aluminum is nonferrous, the gain of the MRA can only be affected by the flow of energies e3ternal to the device. L "oel Message /./9: (/8D8-DJ7 /;B:9) <romB Cill Ceaty oB All Gub)ectB Another MRA *6ve put together an MRA circuit using a 71 spea!er magnet and a /.:1 pie'o slug. %o oDu effects apparent yet. here is so voltage multiplication when it6s run at the pie'o resonance fre&, but the throughput is only :.O at that point. *t6s worse at other fre&uencies. * find no electrical resonance of the magnetDcoil, the only resonance is of the pie'o. he pie'o resonates at :: $h' alone, 72 $h' when in the circuit. * wonder if something in particular is re&uired to ma!e this circuit go oDu. Maybe locationK * hope the device still wor!s when it6s sent elsewhere for verificationI . All the waveforms *6ve seen so far have almost no harmonics. My numbers come from @pp readings off a scope, not from any +@Ms. *6m awaiting some ceramic slab magnets from (QR, so * may still find out more. * wonder if the MRA re&uires its magnet to be free to acoustically resonateK *f the coil is wound so as to dampen the vibration and sound, and if things li!e electrical tape are used improperly, the magnet won6t vibrate. Will this mess things upK Message /./;8 (/8D8-DJ7 8.B:/) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB he -.. turn secondary and 9.W bulbs here was an error in message W /./72...the MRA tested today was made by %orm for test, and has a two to one step up ratio, i.e., /:. turns on the primary, -.. turns on the secondary. <rom what * can measure, this is superior to the original one-to-one ratio of the first MRA, which * wound to test theory. Ma!es sense though, because as the magnet inhales energy, the more secondary you have, the more energy will be collected for the load. Also, have noticed that when light bulbs (ordinary 9.W bulbs) blow, they do so with great vigor and a brighter than normal flash. he filament is e3ploded off of its posts, and flies around the inside of the bulb with enough force to leave striations on the glass.

*n the past, * have associated this with an accumulation of virtual particles on the neutral lines of the house (from other e3periments). his accumulation causes the lines to superconduct when a light switch is turned on, because the neutral is no longer neutral but at an elevated virtual potential. he effect is the same. L "oel Message /.8/- (/8D89DJ7 /JB:9) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB Retesting for Motor +rive (i %orm L Went 1bac! to basics1 today, since everything had been put away (off the !itchen table) for ,hristmas. Retested the 8B/ MRA, and ad)usted the input fre& to give an even 7.@A, across 9.. ohms, and the input from the amp was 8.@A, to the MRA primary. +isconnected the MRA from the amp and connected the amp to the decade bo3, and found that the e&uivalent resistance was 7-. ohms. Go... MRA output = 7. D 9.. = ...9;A N 7. = 8.9; N .;.; = /.2JW MRA input = 8. D 7-. = ...7;A N 8. = ..J- N .;.; = ..99W Fain = 8.29 times unity (owever, when the Aittman motor was connected, the pie'o became more conductive, and the power gain dropped to unity or less, so * tried si3 other pie'os to find one that would handle the motor load without brea!ing down...no luc!. he first pie'o had a lot of miles on it from other tests before we used it to run the motor, and these pie'os are fairly new, so it may ta!e a lot of conditioning before they can handle a motor, or maybe an o3ide coating has to build up on the surfaces. *f the load is too heavy, detuning has no effect. he pie'o that we sent to Walt wasn6t 1motor tested1, so if he loads it very much, it will probably not ma!e unity. (owever, under resistive loads such as today6s test, it is fine. L "oel Message /.8/7 (/8D89DJ7 8-B.-) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB Cac! in Cusiness... (i %orm L After trying si3 pie'os, the seventh was good. *t went through the resistive test better than the others, and on the +, motor, gave -N gain, with 2./mw in and 8.77W out. he input is A, RMG, and the output is +,. %ot sure why the difference with this pie'o, but will try to find out what is different about it. L "oel Message /.8/: (/8D8;DJ7 .;B-8) <romB %orman Wootan oB "ames "ohnson Gub)ectB MRA "ames L #3cellent report on the 1sine wave chopping1. Gee you are verifying e3actly what * have been saying all along about trying to replicate 1"ohn $eely6s1 wor! with computer generated wave forms. *t won6t wor! for you have to have the purest sine

wave that is obtainable to achieve the results we are loo!ing for. he MRA circuit is the same effect, you have to use sine wave input to set up the dual resonance re&uired in the pie'o and magnet at - octave separation or you get 1%0 ,*FAR1. han!s for the report. * am still loo!ing for the 1(ammond organ1 sine wave generator before proceeding any further on the 1water dissociation1. L %orm Message /.8/9 (/8D8;DJ7 .;B-2) <romB %orman Wootan oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB MRA (Cill Ceaty @ersion) "oel L * set up Cill6s MRA yesterday before leaving for Gan Antone to visit my son and daughter. *t burned in from 2B..AM till /B..AM this morning so it is well seasoned now for delivery to Cill. Will )ot down the parameters so he won6t have any trouble booting it off for his test. *t is a carbon copy of the /8B/ *D0 ratio for it has the 8B/ winding ratio li!e the last one * delivered to you. L %orm Message /.8/2 (/8D8;DJ7 .JB/J) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB 03ide coating and solder (i %orm L %ow that the MRA has been conditioned with the new pie'o, the effective impedance of the circuit is slightly over 8:.. ohms, and the power gain is /7.-, with the motor load. *t came up within a half hour of powering it up...output and input voltages both climbing until the +, out was /:O less than ma3, while the voltage applied climbed until there was no drop across the MRA. * used the decade bo3 across the power in, and ad)usted it until the input voltage was starting to drop, which was at 8:.. ohms. *t is now tuned and balanced at --.2-$('. he only difference with this pie'o that is visible is in the method of soldering the leads. * dripped a ball of solder on each side, and there is flu3 around its edges on the pie'o. * then tinned the leads and melted them into the solder balls. * thin! that this wor!s because it doesn6t brea! through the o3ide coating. Reminds me of Cearden6s concept, the 1old wire1 idea... only wor!s if you don6t scrape through to the copper. L "oel Message /.88. (/8D8;DJ7 /:B.7) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB 4ltimate est (i %orm L * )ust did the 1ultimate1 test of the MRA, proving that it is over unity even if you assume that the amplifier which feeds it is /..O efficient. * measured actual A, current to the amplifier, both with the MRA connected and disconnected. he difference at /8.@A, is /8ma. his means that /8ma times /8.@A, = /.77W N .;.; = /..8W into the amplifier. he MRA is, at the same time, supplying +, output power to a motor of /8@+, at /7.ma, for /.92W.

Go, even if you assume that the amplifier is /..O efficient, which it definitely is not, the MRA is still 9/O over unity. his is a bottom line number to cut through the ha'e of 1power factor1 &uestions, and end the discussion of whether it is over unity, so we can determine e3actly (0W M4,( it is over unity. * don6t thin! that anyone will suggest that the Radio Ghac! amplifier is over unity, so the gain can only be coming from one place, and since it6s +, off the bridge, it is true power. L "oel Message /.88/ (/8D8;DJ7 /;B89) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB Addendum to 4ltimate est (i %orm L Went bac! as you suggested and chec!ed the input from the sig gen to the amp. he output terminals of the sig gen have /.8;@A, across them and measuring the drop with a series resistor, there is .../-W from the sig gen. Actually, you can remove the sig gen return line and the MRA will stay in oscillation with no current from the sig gen e3cept a few microamps of lea!age current, as * found out as * was connecting the series non-inductive resistor. <or all practical purposes, there is no power being added to the circuit from the sig gen. L "oel Message /.8-: (/8D82DJ7 /8B.:) <romB Cill Ceaty oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB mra measurements his guy Cob "ewett on internet pointed out a measurement problem which * had not noticed. @oltage measurements across a resistor ,A%%0 be done as two measurements referenced to a third point if phase is variable. *n some common resonant circuits, the voltage on either end of a resistor could be way out of phase with respect to common, yet the pea! and the rms voltages on the resistor ends would be identical. Go if you measure each end separately, you see the same voltage, and assume the current is 'ero. Cut if you measure A,R0GG the resistor, you see a large (real) voltage, and discover the current is large. Go, measurements must be done with a floating meter across the resistor, or with a dualtrace scope in differential mode and the two probes placed across the resistor. 0r you can always move the position of the resistor in the circuit so that one end is the same as the common point of all the test e&uipment, then measure from the common point to the 6high6 side with less chance of mista!es caused by phase. Message /.8-; (/8D82DJ7 /-B8-) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB MRA reduces A, line current (i %orm L * left the MRA on all night and ran the *D0 test again, comparing the A, power into the amp with the +, power out of the MRA under a motor load. he audio amp now draws -ma >#GG line current from the /8.@A, input when the MRA is on the output of the amplifier. he motor is running along with /..9@+, at /7.ma of power from the MRA. he MRA is forcing the amp6s transistors out of

conduction, which is seen by the line input as a lower load re&uirement to the power supply of the amp, or basically as a higher resistance to input current. his means that the MRA is producing Mhos, which it could be using for its own circulating current, but instead is using to drive down current from the amp. * compared this with the 4niversal Resonance ,urve for series resonant circuits by first changing the input fre& until the MRA was out of resonance, then bringing it to full output, then reducing the gain by increasing the fre&uency. he MRA, out of resonance, causes a -ma increase in line current )ust by being connected to the amp. As a series resonant circuit, the MRA has theoretical 'ero impedance (limited to copper loss) at pea! resonance, which is its ma3 power output point. +#tuning the MRA by increasing the fre&uency should decrease the input current, which it does. (owever, at the 9:O point of relative resonance, which is where it is now, the resonance curve intersects with the phase angle of applied current from the amp. his is the 1!nee1 of the input current phase angle rise. he current should continue to rise, but is being forced down by the harmonic content of the MRA at resonance, as seen by the decrease in input current to the amplifier... not )ust below the non-resonant load of the MRA, but below no-load. L "oel Message /.8-2 (/8D82DJ7 /7B/8) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB (R) mra measurements (i Cill L We have tried both methods of measurement, and the problem which we have is that there is very high voltage multiplication across both elements of the series resonant circuit. We are dealing with typical Y6s of over /.., which is normal in a series resonant circuit, but which ma!e a voltage drop measurement meaningless. Go, we measure the e&uivalent load using a precision decade bo3, or as most recently we measure the delta in input power to the audio amp, which will decrease under the output load of the MRA at 9:O of the resonant pea!. Ahase isn6t )ust variable, it6s /2. degrees out relative to the individual components. %o matter where you put a resistor in the series resonant circuit, you will measure a drop which is the result of multiplied voltage. Cut you can6t fool a decade bo3. When you remove the MRA and put the decade bo3 in its place, and set the resistors to give the same delta in applied voltage, you !now #NA, >5 how much current is being drawn. *f you use a current probe, which we have also done, you also see the multiplied voltage, because the pic!up of the probe is a coil. * would thin! that, based upon his &uestion, Cob "ewett is aware of these considerations. (is assumption that you will see a high voltage drop is correct, because you are measuring the difference in multiplied voltages... now *< you want to relate this to actual *%A4 voltage, divide this drop by the multiplication factor of the circuit, and you will have the voltage which you can use for current measurement, and which agrees e3actly with the decade bo3. 5ou can prove this with any series resonant circuit, it doesn6t have to be the MRA. L "oel

Message /.878 (/8D82DJ7 /:B7:) <romB %orman Wootan oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB MRA "oel L Gure sounds li!e you have been busy nailing this beast down. * built another 8B/ for Cill and will visit later to discuss the other test. #veryone is as!ing the right &uestions for which we already have 1plowed the ground1 so have some answers. 5ou !now * 1pinch1 myself all the time and as! 1is this really happeningK1. @erification is the answer to all the &uestions. L %orm Message /.87- (/8D82DJ7 /2B/:) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB +rop current and decade current (i Cill L (ere6s some numbers ta!en from actual measurement to help define the primary current drawn by the MRA. @oltage applied from amplifier = 8-.-2@A, #&uivalent resistance measurement = :.. ohms ,urrent = # divided by R = ...792 amperes Geries drop across 8 ohm resistor = .-2.@A, @oltage multiplication = 7 times input voltage in the series circuit (%oteB ,ombined voltages across pie'o and primary = four times the voltage applied by the amplifier. *f we6re going to apply the current derived by the drop to input voltage for power, then it must be the ratio of the input voltage, not the multiplied voltage.) @oltage of .-2.@A, divided by 7 = ..J:@A, ,urrent = ..J:@A, divided by 8 ohms = ..7;: amperes Aower in either case is e&ual to 8-.-2@A, times ..7; = /..J2W RMG power = /..J2W times ..;.; = ..;;;W Measured output from the MRA is /2.7@+, times ../7. = 8.:;9W Aower gain = -.-8 times unity. * don6t !now what else to do, or what other test to perform at this point, so *6ll stop here unless someone can suggest something. *f reducing A, line current in the previous test wasn6t enough, then * guess nothing ever will be for the 1eternal s!eptics1 on the *-%et. L "oel Message /.8:- (/8D8JDJ7 .9B87) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA Cill L After successfully running the MRA on /8 +ec. "oel and * video taped the original prototype running on his table and driving two loads i.e., light bulbs and +, motors at the same time so that no one could say that this was R< as we have seen when e3perimenters run small neon tubes. he video of course has date time stamps on the

footage. his is normal and prudent procedures when establishing time and place of invention. * have had so many calls now re&uesting magnets and pie'o6s that * cannot possibly supply them. * spent about - hours on the phone yesterday tal!ing to people across this country re-MRA. he biggest problem that * have encountered is the fact that all who have called have only the original MRA.AG, file and do not have the MRA/.AG, and the most important R4>#J.AG,. Without the RuleJ.AG, they do not have the theory that ma!es the MRA possible. ,opies of the MRA.AG, are being sent all over this country to friends and other researchers without the R4>#J.AG,. Are you posting the MRA (public 1A1) messages to *nternet each day so that there is a constant up-date as to progressK L %orm Message /.8:7 (/8D8JDJ7 .9B-9) <romB %orman Wootan oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB MRA (Aower est) "oel L * have been putting a lot of thought into the high power test of the MRA device. Gince you have determined that the circuit is creating what we call Mhos and usually this phenomenon is associated with vacuum tubes in operation and going bac! to the wor! of . (enry Moray with his 1valve1 then * am setting up this 8:. watt tube power amp for the ultimate test. Gince transistors seem to not be able to ta!e the buc!ing effect of the 1first harmonic1 chec! in the input current into the circuit we should use the vacuum tube for this final stage of signal in)ection into the MRA series resonant primary. he 1finals1 tubes then are basically in the series circuit and will survive the punishment brought on by the 1hammering1 effect of the first harmonic. hese large output tubes will display more of your 1Mhos1 effect than simple transistors. * still believe, (* !eep dreaming about it) that the vacuum tube should play a part in the circuit as a 1coherer1 of the HA# into the circuit. ,ertainly worth trying for we are at the point where we need to push the pie'o6s at their design power ratings of :. watts at /:. @olts. here will be some serious voltages developed in the series resonant primary for we have already seen nearly /... @olts circulating with only 8. volts of primary input. A vacuum tube is the only animal that could survive the punishment in a high voltage circuit li!e this. Cob Aaddoc!6s indestructible transistors won6t cut it in this harsh environment. houghts and ideas. L %orm Message /.8:; (/8D8JDJ7 /.B88) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB esting, /-8-(i Cill L 5ou made a suggestion a while bac! about going into the amplifier output section and measuring current from an isolated point. hat was done this morning, measuring both voltage and current into and out of the isolation transformer. *t was easy, because the 3fmr leads are wire wrapped to pins on top of the pcb. he input to the isolation transformer is consuming 8.7 watts, and the output is measuring /.J watts, while the MRA is providing 8.- watts, which is less than the input to the isolation transformer, but more than the output. Gince the secondary of the isolation transformer is part of the 1voltage multiplied1 primary of the MRA, its power at /.J watts may be overstated... but regardless, the MRA output is above it by 89O, and

that is +,, after a bridge rectifier. MRA primary current was decreasing while the secondary output was increasing, but * too! a reading rather than wait all day to see e3actly where it would go. *ncreasing power to the MRA (went up to 8.@+, out on a /J./@+, rated motor) increased the ratio to -.O. What this is saying is that the gain of the MRA is high enough so that it doesn6t matter whether you measure primary current direct in-line across multiplied voltage... it6s still over unity. %ow * really don6t !now what to test ne3t. GuggestionsK L "oel Message /.89/ (/8D8JDJ7 /7B-.) <romB %orman Wootan oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB MRA (Aower est) "oel L +o you thin! *6m cra'yK * had no intention to )ust turn the switch on a 8:. Watt amp driving the pie'o. What * said is that we need to substitute a vacuum tube amp in the circuit instead of the puny transistors we are now using so we can proceed in the power test. * li!e you agree with caution on something we are not really sure of the true nature of the beast. +on6t worry, there is no intention of running very significant amounts of power at this time. L %orm Message /.89: (/8D8JDJ7 8.B-.) <romB Cill Ceaty oB All Gub)ectB MRA measurements %orm and "oel L About the current-sensing resistor position, * mean you should try connecting it li!e thisB coilsD magnet pie'o ZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZSMTSZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZS S S S S SMTS S Sout S S S S ZZSZZZZ S S load D , SS , S S S S res. U , SS , S @rms S S 0G, S D , SS , SZZZZZZS S S U , SS , 8..ohm S S S SZZZZZZS SZZZZZZZZDUDUDUZZZZZZZSZZZZZZZZScom S S S SZZZZZZZS S S S ZZZZZZ S SZZZZS SZZS S @rms S SZZZZZZS . #ven if the whole circuit is floating, the oscillator6s 6common6 terminal will act as a reference point, and the high voltages across the pie'o and magnet then should not mess up the input measurements. Gimply multiply the two RMG voltage readings, divide by 8.. ohms, and you6ll !now the worst case input power (as close as the RMG meter can tell you, that is.) *f you6ve already tried the above measurement, does it give overunity

numbersK *f it won6t, then there may be something screwy with the other measurements. * would trust the above setup. *f a dual-channel scope is substituted for the RMG meters (with the scope6s common lead going to the oscillator common terminal) you should be able to see the current and voltage waveforms at the same time, so phase can be observed directly, ending lots of arguments. Whaddaya thin!K L Cill Message /.89; (/8D8JDJ7 8-B..) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB W. Rosenthal called... (i %orm L Walter Rosenthal says that the effect of watches running slow in the vicinity of HA# devices is well !nown, and says that om Cearden can describe it better than anybody. * fa3ed Walt the most recent message base test data. We also tal!ed about possibly using the MRA as an earth&ua!e warning device, so he may !eep it after the tests to try it for that purpose. (e also said that the method of attaching leads to the pie'o is very important, and that attaching them closer to the hole would be better because the effect is li!e putting your hand on a bell... you muffle the sound more as you get further toward the outer edges. L "oel Message /.89J (/8D-.DJ7 .JB72) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB (R) MRA measurements (i Cill L han! you for the diagram. *6m going to tell you some things in this message which will ma!e no sense to you in terms of conventional electronics... but *6ve put in close to J. test hours with the MRA so far, and these are reproducible constants for the circuit. om Cearden has been &uoted as saying 1... thin! bac!wards1 when you are dealing with devices of this type, and in many ways this is true. he MRA primary is a esla coil which is being fed by the matching 3fmr secondary of the signal generator. As with any esla coil, there is voltage multiplication, and this appears across every element of the completed primary circuit, including the signal generator6s output 3fmr secondary. Cecause of this, you will measure a voltage across the signal generator output secondary which is higher under load than it is at no-load. *n a conventional 3fmr, this is not possible. After you turn on the MRA, and for a period of hours afterwards, you will see the +, output climb in increments while the MRA primary current drops in increments and the signal generator output secondary voltage goes above no-load. his is the opposite of a normal power supply. *f you add a resistor anywhere in the MRA primary circuit, the primary current will increase... also the opposite of a typical transformer, where resistors are used to

decrease current. While the primary current is increasing, the output +, is dropping, also the opposite of what you would e3pect. he MRA can be tuned to drive down A, line current below no-load, and still produce usable power. As far as primary current, the only way that *6ve been able to measure it is inline, with a meter that has a fre& range of 8..$(', and even the tiny voltage drop of the inline meter will increase current and lower output +,. @ery few of the 1old rules1 apply in a circuit which is adding power to the applied power at resonance. *t6s li!e having an e3ternal power source in the middle of the circuit, and in fact, that is what you have. he pie'o is adding free electrons and the magnet is acting li!e a generator, and the combination e&uals unity plus. 5ou will have to see this for yourself... * still do, every day in fact )ust to ma!e sure it6s real. *t is. (ave funI L "oel Message /.8;/ (/8D-.DJ7 /-B.9) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB ,ool ,urrent (i %orm L om Cearden and others have reported the effect of 1cold current1 in free energy devices, and so the &uestion comes up regarding the MRA, 1where6s the cold currentK1 *6ve ta!en the MRA6s temperature at all inputs and outputs, and everything is :-/. degrees warmer than ambient air, e3cept for one place. here is one place where the temp is the same as ambient, and it is a path in the series circuit which should read warmer, li!e all of the other paths... so, there is some cooling, but not a lot of it under low level input and output. hat location is the wires connecting the pie'o to the primary, which should be as warm as the other wires in the series circuit, but these wires stay at room temp. hat is the location where we should see 1blue light1 on camera film. %ow that om has seen the schematic, if we as! him where we should see it, * bet he6ll !now. L "oel Message /.8J; (/8D-/DJ7 /.B72) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA Cill L 5our complete MRA is on the way and should be there by Monday. * downloaded the *nternet traffic and saw so much 1negative energy1 being e3pended out there trying to discredit something that we offered up in the 1Aublic +omain1 for other researchers to ta!e a serious loo! at. he first counter statement that * will ma!e is that "oel and * agreed that we will not sell or accept any re-imbursement of any !ind for anything connected with the MRA device for the very reason sited in the message traffic. %o * will not sell off my small stoc! of transducers. * will give magnets and transducers only to serious researchers for the purpose of circuit 0ver-unity output verification. We are not see!ing any profit from this device thus the reason for offering it as 1public domain1. *f those out there are so narrow minded that they will not analy'e the circuit for what it does, so be it. hey are beyond help. o those who &uestion why

we have not 1self powered1 the device, we are wor!ing on the voltage regulator, oscillator and power driver circuit that will ma!e this possible. #veryone thin!s this can be done overnight --- 1wrong1 --- things don6t happen that fast. 0ur intent was to get the fundamentals out for all to see and e3periment with. he most important document in the MRA pro)ect is the R4>#J.AG, file which e3plains the fundamental theory behind the MRA principle. * will be putting out a paper shortly e3plaining what is going on in the Friggs and Aer!ins (ydrosonic Aump for it is directly tied in to the MRA in principle of operation and HA# tapping effects. More on that later. As to the critics out there saying that measurements of input power are defective. his is what we currently have at our disposal on our wor! benches between "oel and myself. 8 ea. Feneral Radio Arecision +ecade Resistor Co3es, - ea. echtronic 79: +ual race Gcopes, 8 ea. <lu!e 2; true RMG meters, / ea. A9.78 ,urrent Arobe, 8 ea A9.8/ ,urrent Arobes, / Wavete! /97 Gig Fen, / ea C$ Arecision #-/.C Gig Fen, / ea. (A 8.. ,+ Gig Fen, / (A :-2<re& ,ounter, 8 ea Gimpson <re& ,ounters, /ea. Wavete! +M 8;N; meter Q fre& counter, and a whole bunch of the old analog Gimpson and ripplet meters that have been cast aside with the coming of the digital world. * reali'e that we do not have the sophisticated e&uipment that you would find in an industrial or university lab but it gives us a good idea as to what is fact or fiction. We have the circuit out being tested by those that do have the latest state-of-the-art e&uipment so time will tell all. Ce patient is all * have to say for now. *n time the truth will be !nown to all. L %orm Message /.-./ (/8D-/DJ7 /8B//) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB (R) MRA reduces A, line current his means that the MRA is producing Mhos, which it could be using for its own circulating current, but instead is using to drive down current from the amp. * almost fell on the floor when * read 1producing Mhos1. >ecture Mode 0nB %othing 1produces1 Mhos. Mhos are now called Giemens, and given the unit G. MAersonally * li!ed the humor of Mhos (0hms bac!wards)T. Mhos are the 6reciprocal6 (mathematical opposite) of 0hms. R = /DF or F=/DR Where R = Resistance in 0hms F = ,onductance in Giemens (Mhos) ,onductance and Resistance refer to the same thing but from opposite viewpoints. While Resistance is the Resistance to current flow, ,onductance is the allowance of current flow? 'ero conductance = infinite resistance. *6m sure you6ve calculated the total resistance (Rt) of a number of resistors in parallel using this formulaB Rt = /D( /DR/ P /DR8 P /DR- .... P /DR3) What you are really doing is adding the resistors ,onductance values together as if the resisters where in series. hen converting the series ,onductance value bac! into the parallel resistance with the finial /D(). Also in this inverted world liveB Gusceptance, C, the reciprocal of (/DN) and, Admittance, 5, the reciprocal of impedance (/DH). Aeople at

wor! tell me * have a warped perspective, and tend to loo! at things bac!wards M* loo! at it as turning a negative in to a positive or a 6feature6T. Also while *6m in this lecturing mode (* don6t li!e it) is this .;.; thingB .;.; has %0 (*%F, H*A, %06+A, to do with Aower <actor, as * e3plained in one of my previous messages to %orm. .;.; has to do with converting VA4R#V sine waves in to the wor! e&uivalent of +, (RMG). 5ou !eep tal!ing about harmonics so * assume that you don6t have VA4R#V sine wavesK * don6t li!e coming across as the heavy here all of the time, but if you want to be ta!en seriously by he Rest 0f the World then we all need to be on the heir program.... #ven if hey don6t get it... >ecture Mode 0ff. Message /.-.8 (/8D-/DJ7 /8B/-) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB (R) +rop current and decade current * don6t !now what else to do, or what other test to perform at this point, so *6ll stop here unless someone can suggest something. A heat based power meter, or better yet a ,alorimeter. *f reducing A, line current in the previous test wasn6t enough, then * guess nothing ever will be for the 1eternal s!eptics1 on the *-%et. +on6t waste timeDenergy on the 6eternal s!eptics6 they6ll die off and a new breed will grow up in their place that 6Fet *t6. Message /.-.- (/8D-/DJ7 /8B/:) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB (R) MRA (Aower est) Gince you have determined that the circuit is creating what we call Mhos and usually this phenomenon is associated with vaccuum tubes in operation. 5ou are thin!ing of ransconductance (gm Msmall F with small subscript mT), also !nown as Mutual ,onductance. here are several people that ma!e ransconductance *,6s now (Ma3im and (arris for two? good into the hundreds of megahert'). *n a given tube, if #g varies by some amount the *p will vary by a certain amount. ubes having the ability of producing a relatively wide *p variation with a given #g variation have high values of transconductance. Fm = +*p D +#g (Ghould be small letters with a subscript) u = d#p D d#g gm = uDrp Where gm = transconductanc in siemens (mhos) u = amplification factor rp = ac plate impedance ransconductance (gm) also shows up in "<# s? its ability to vary the output current, *d, when an input-voltage variation is applied (some times this is called forward transadmittance, yf or gf (small yDsmall g subscript f). gm = (+#> A idD+#> A @gs) S @ds constant %o magic in the math here... A vacuum tube is the only animal that could survive the punishment in a high voltage circuit li!e this. Cob Aaddoc!6s indestructible transistors won6t cut it in this harsh environment. 5ou6re right a normal transistor would never

survive this, but chec! out the *FC 6s and M, s in that (arris boo!. /8.. volts is no problem. *nternational Rectifier also has some M0G<# s that get up in the /...P range, and Motorola6s (+ M0G are getting close. * li!e the M0G ones myself. Ma!e sure you use the ones with the $alvonic contact current sense to simplify your measurements and feedbac! control. Also you have to watch the dvDdt and diDdt not )ust the voltage. Message /.-.; (/8D-/DJ7 /7B/-) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB MRA *D0 Ratios est dateB /8--/-J7 o measure apples against apples, *6ve tested the MRA at both of the output levels which are important, Ma3imum Aower and Ma3imum Fain, using the resistive e&uivalent load method. he measurements were made to attain the same signal source voltage drop as when the MRA is in the circuit as well as to measure the current in series with the decade bo3 at those voltage drops. he applied voltage is 8-.;:@A, from a signal source. At Ma3imum Aower, this voltage dropped to 8/.J@A,. At Ma3imum gain, it dropped to 8-.8:@A,. At Ma3imum Aower, the e&uivalent resistance to obtain a signal voltage drop to 8/.J@A, is /9: ohms, and the measured current is /-8ma. At Ma3imum Fain, the e&uivalent resistance to obtain a signal voltage drop to 8-.8:@A, is :J: ohms, and the measured current is 7.ma. *nput power is calculated using the above measurements to be 8..7W RMG at Ma3imum Aower, and 9:2mw RMG at Ma3imum Fain. he output power for this test was in rectified and filtered +, voltage applied across a running motor which drew /7.ma of current. At Ma3imum Aower, the output voltage w /2.-2@+,, and power was therefore 8.:;W. his is a gain of .:-W, or /.89 times unity. At Ma3imum Fain, the output voltage was /:.:@+,, and power was therefore 8./;W. his is a gain of /.:/W, or -.-. times unity. he measurements were made in the linear output region of the signal source, where variations in the resistive values, either higher or lower, would cause corresponding changes in applied voltage and series current. he pattern of current increases and decreases is the same as is seen when 1live1 measurements are ta!en in the MRA primary circuit. (owever, the live measurements in the circuit when it is reactive and therefore has multiplied voltages present do not conform to 0hm6s >aw, and are not considered to be reliable. Any losses which occur as a result of rectifying and filtering the A, to +, are considered as a 1cost of doing business1, because +, is useful for powering a load, and -7$(' is not. herefore, these losses are not factored into the power gain measurement. L "oel

Message /.-.2 (/8D-/DJ7 /7B/7) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB ,all Q <a3 from om Cearden (i %orm L om Cearden sent a fa3 (// pages) e3plaining much of the effects of the MRA in terms of Whitta!er waves and how this is causing phase con)ugate pump waves to 1slip in1 hyper --space (aetheric) energy. Cecause of the materials in the MRA and the use of three octaves of resonance, he says that the over unity effect is unavoidable. Many other circuits can be made using the same principles, but the difference with the MRA is that the energy is ,0% R0>>#+ and producing wor!. * called him bac!... * still haven6t read all of the fa3... and we tal!ed for a while. * want him to have the MRA that *6m using for test now as his evaluation unit, and he will get it certified by 1recogni'ed1 members of the scientific community. %e3t time you come over, we6ll pac! it up and send it to him. L "oel Message /.-// (/8D-/DJ7 /7B8J) <romB Cill Ceaty oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB (R) esting, /-8-hat6s e3cellent news on the MRA gain measurements. * am very unsure about this voltage multiplying effect as applied to any series resistors or components within the oscillator. *n a series-resonant circuit, the voltage across the coil and capacitor will build up hugely because of resonant energy storage, but this will not affect the voltage across the current-sampling resistor or across the driving oscillator, or across the current probe coil (unless the probe coil has a resonant fre&uency the same as the MRA.) Cut then again, oDu physics could do all !inds of une3pected things. *t sure would be strange if oDu devices are common, but their effects ma!e measurement devices read incorrectly and underestimate actual energy 1creation.1 . he only true way to prove that the device wor!s is to ma!e it function as a self-acting blac! bo3. *f the oDu percentage is high enough, the power amp could be driven from the +, out of the MRA. 0r, as someone on the %et suggested, you could connect the MRA output to a /8.vac inverter, and feed that bac! to normal /8.v drive e&uipment. Cig losses via inverter efficiency though. *t definitely should be possible to build a custom ampDoscillator having very low supply re&uirements, so that even a low oDu percentage could be made into a self-sustaining energy source. 4ntil this is done, there is a chance that we are all fooling ourselves. he slowing wristwatches and the self-oscillation %orm observed are very good signs this is real. Message /.-/- (/8D-/DJ7 /:B-;) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cob Aaddoc! Gub)ectB 5our Messages (i Cob L *6ll try to answer all of your messages... very thoughtful stuff, and * appreciate the time you6ve put into them.

Mhos...hmmm...well, per the boo!s, it was the closest thing * could find to describe the effect... o!, *6ll call it by it6s proper nameB 1energy density and energy transport in bidirectional #M wave flu3 to create massless displacement current via hidden channel (Whitta!er <ield) phase con)ugate pumping1 ,all me old fashioned, but * really prefer the humble Mho to describe the effect... * can wrap my brain around a Mho, but it6s still stretching AW<4>>5 hard to get around that other stuff.... he sig gen is grounded, but its output is off of an isolation 3fmr, and the amp is ungrounded... btw, the fre&uency of oscillation )umps up one octave to over 99$(' when you remove the signal return lead from the sig gen and let it run open. han! you for clearing up the power factor 1cosine of theta1 stuff. *t6s good confirmation, since we are comparing the input power with output +, from a bridge rectifier... apples with apples. L "oel Message /.-7- (./D.8DJ: .2B7.) <romB Cen ,obb oB All Gub)ectB MRA 0ther waysK * came here from the *net, even though Cill is doing a good )ob of putting the information up there, he doesn6t seem to be getting the messages (the serious, constructive ones) bac! to you guys, so * have to pay for the >+ call. (ope Cill will hear this and change his ways, anyway Cill, * do en)oy your WWW page, !eep up the good wor!. Fuys, Alease, Alease... ry ta!ing one of your prototypes and put a coil around the magnet to ma!e it 1move1 li!e the pei'o does. What * mean is to hang the magnet somehow (with string, rubber bandsK) in the middle of a coil so that you can 1modulate1 it with this coil. his coil would %0 ,0% A, the magnet, as your other ones do. his may save you the problems of the Aei'o feedbac! and such... please try it and let me !now what happens. * am serious, what would it hurtK Why wouldn6t some other sort of stimulation at that fre&uency wor!K he idea is to move the magnet at that fre&uency isn6t itK Also, before you guys go for the 1big power1 driving this circuit, you better tie it to the bench... "ust a warning because this has been done before, and it damaged some e&uipment real bad.... (a big test) Message /.-79 (./D.8DJ: //B:.) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB MRA ech %ote (ere6s another tech. note which may be useful for e3perimenters who choose to build and test their own MRA. Cecause we are resonating both the pie'o and the magnet physically, it is important that the MRA is not left in a very cold environment before use. * put one out in a cold garage (well below free'ing) for two days, and found that the

magnet is slow to warm up, and as a result, the +, output voltage is under 2.O of where it was when the MRA was at room temperature. Also, it will not detune properly when it is cold. *n other words, it behaves li!e an ordinary series resonant circuit. Actually, * thin! it6s more li!e the effect a cold car battery, which loses efficiency when it is cold. *f your MRA, particularly the magnet, gets cold, let it warm up overnight before you use it. hese are big magnets, and it ta!es a long time for them to warm up. #ven when the surface temperature is warm, the magnet is cold inside, and it ta!es time for it to transfer heat. L "oel Message /.-72 (./D.8DJ: /-B//) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cen ,obb Gub)ectB MRA 0ther Ways CenB than!s for the input on suspending the magnet material inside a coil so that it is totally free to oscillate or resonate at what ever fre& that 1sha!es out1. We have had several $eely-%etters suggest the same thing but have not gotten around to that phase of testing. We have had a suggestion that there may be a 1light1 interface also that we have not investigated. o show that you input is valued, * have )ust finished winding a 71 diameter air core coil so we can suspend the magnet inside of same so as to be free to resonate. %ow the tric!, 1some e3perimenting here1 is to find the best method of suspension. * !eep thin!ing about the 1chime bar in the ordinary door chime1 method of suspension. Gupport at the 1node points1 is the terminology therefore we don6t interfere with the resonance or attenuate it. * will get bac! to you after we have done some testing on this approach. * will deliver this set up to "oel so he can run it through its paces. * want to build one that is a full-blown esla coil with a design fre& of /;7.J $(H so we can couple directly with the earth6s natural ferro-magnetic fre&uency. his approach !eeps coming bac! to 1haunt me for some reason so why not pursue it. More later. han!s again. L %orm Message /.-:. (./D.8DJ: /7B-2) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA CillB We all get criticism from all directions when we attempt to inform the world of new and e3citing energy info. We value your part in this endeavor (*nternet interface and 1#1 researcher) and loo! forward to reading all feed bac! from the 1big %et1 (,an you really tal! to F0+ on the *nternet K). * !now that there is a lot of positive support out there for * have been receiving calls from some very interesting #ngineers wor!ing behind 1high security1 doors for some top defense and industrial contractors who are really pushing the state of the art in electronics research. All have said 1congratulations for sharing what you are learning1 for this is the only way the word can get out of a very tight circle of research. he ones out there shouting the 1negatives1 are really eaten up with the idea of 1free energy1 or a new form of energy but have not been able to envision the correct approach. $eep the words flowing (both ways) so we can feel the 1pulse1 of that other world called 1A,A+#M*A1. L %orm

Message /.-:8 (./D.-DJ: .9B72) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB (R) MRA measurements he pie'o is adding free electrons and the magnet is acting li!e a generator, and the combination e&uals unity plus. his reminds me of "oe %ewman6s idea where the mass of the wire is converted to energy via # = M(,V,). (ave you ever put the MRA on a balance scale (A (oo!s >aw scale might be upset via the operation of the MRA, see the wor! of F. (odowanec, the Fravity Wave Fuy)K *s it losing mass at almost immeasurably small rate while operatingK Message /.-:7 (./D.-DJ: .9B:/) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB (R) 5our Messages Mhos...hmmm...well, per the boo!s, it was the closest thing * could find to describe the effect...o!, *6ll call it by it6s proper nameB 1energy density and energy transport in bidirectional #M wave flu3 to create massless displacement current via hidden channel (Whitta!er <ield) phase con)ugate pumping1X * thin! * get it now (K). Cy your use of the term Mhos, * thin! you are implying %egative Resistance (%egative power creation), which is entirely different than ,onductance (measured in the units Mhos). Gometimes my 1education1 gets in the way the Mhos being a case in point. ,an we come up with a term for %egative Resistance, and %egative Aower, and avoid the use of Mhos so as not to confuse othersK Also 1+isplacement ,urrent1 has a te3t boo! meaning and a 1<ree #nergy1 meaningX what do we do thereK unnel +iodes e3hibit %egative Resistance. >ambda +iodes also do too. unnel +iodes are e3pensive these days (E:.P). Cut you can ma!e a >ambda +iode out of bac! to bac! A and % "<# s, connect all li!e leads together (gate to gate, etc). Also the 1Clac! (ole Antenna1 wor! of Gutton, where he synthesi'es ->D-RD-,. he problem here is that none of these really have much to do with <ree #nergy. Go where does that leave usK *6ve read Whitta!ers papers, but the math in them is far beyond my abilities today. What * got out of them was that Whitta!er showed than any (ert'en Wave ( ransverse @ector Wave) could be bro!en down into its component Gcalar Waves. (ow does this relate to the MRAK *6ve never &uite 1Fot *t1 with the phase con)ugate pumping stuff yet, time for more study. he timeless (-t) reflection bac! to the source point always seemed li!e a fun way to Hap the Happers.... 0! *6ve went and dug up Ahysics odayDApril /J2/ 1Applications of optical phase con)ugation1 by ,oncetto R. Fuiliano M(as e3cellent references listed at the end for anyone that6s interestedT. Am * correct in assuming that the MRA is acting as the pilotDreference path, and that Aether is acting as the con)ugatorDsourceK Gtill feel *6m missing a connection here, *6ll go dig out Cearden6s boo!s.... Message /.-:J (./D.-DJ: .JB/.) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB MRA ech %ote - Wire

<rom the coils which %orm and * have wound so far, it appears that 88 gauge stranded wire is the best choice. Also, we6ve e3perimented with different turns ratios, and a step down to the secondary of two to one, with -.. turns on the primary and /:. turns on the secondary gives good gain ratios, and detunes very well. (owever, the transformer was originally wound as a step-up, so the primary is actually on the outside of the secondary, but we don6t !now yet if this is the best way to do it. ime and more e3periments will tell. We do !now that solid wire doesn6t wor!. *t will li!ely ta!e a few months before we have collected enough data to recommend an absolute best design. L "oel Message /.-9/ (./D.-DJ: /.B.-) <romB Cill Ceaty oB All Gub)ectB MRA * )ust received parts from (QR, so *6ll be able to try building a version with these other parts using %orm6s device as a guide. *f it wor!s, then we6ll have (temporarily) a parts source to recommend. he pie'os are less than /D71 thic!. he ceramic magnets are /1 thic! slabs with poles on the faces, but they have W0 poles on the faces rather than one big one. 5et another change to try. Multiple poles might ma!e the magnet vibrate harder with smaller input, but the polesDcoils pattern has to be )ust right to do this. Message /.-9- (./D.-DJ: /.B.:) <romB Cill Ceaty oB All Gub)ectB MRADGweet coil - ZZ Z ZZ G G G ZZG - -G- ZZZZZZZZZZZ - -GDU G ZZZ-----------ZZZ G S ZZ---ZZ S S S S S MAF%# S S S S S S ZZZZZZZZZZZ S UD S ZZZ------ % % ------ZZZ S SZZ-- % % % % --ZZS

DU S S S S S UD

. *f the magnet bloc! is magneti'ed as above, and vibrates in a bending mode as above, then it6s possible that the reports of Gweet6s 1scalar1 coil windings are not scalar at all. *f you want to ma!e a magnet vibrate transversly as shown, you should wind two coils, one towards each end, then connect them so the field polarity from the coils is pushing each other, so you end up with a tripole %-G-% pattern. When you power such a thing with A,, the center of the slab magnet will be pushed one way, the ends the other, and the magnet will vibrate transversely (microscopically) li!e a pluc!ed string. . ZZZZnnnnnnnZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZnnnnnnnZZZZZ S SSSSSSS % % % SSSSSSS S

S SSSSSSS MAF%# SSSSSSS S S SSSSSSS SSSSSSS S SZZZZuuuuuuuZZZZZZGZZZZZGZZZZZGZZZZuuuuuuuZZZZZS S S S S S ,oilS S ,oilS S / S S 8 S S SZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZS S S S S S o o ---------------------------------------Message /.-9: (./D.-DJ: //B.-) <rom B "oel Mc,lain oB Cob Aaddoc! Gub)ectB Mo6 on Mhos (i Cob L When the MRA was designed, the intent was to create and above unity device based upon earth itself... its magnetic fields and fre&uencies. We6ve since seen that it is directionally sensitive to earth magnetic fields, and that it 1responds1 to sunrise and sunset. <or all practical purposes, the MRA at resonance is li!e a funnel with a vacuum device attached to the narrow end, collecting energy which becomes more condensed as it travels into the funnel, where it is trapped in the windings of the transformer by the collapsing magnetic fields. his then represents an e3cess potential, which we see when the signal input voltage is higher under load of the MRA than it is under no-load conditions. We also see this when we can reduce the entire A, power to the signal source below no-load, while at the same time producing usable power from the MRA. According to scalar theory, the e3cess potential is a &uantum voltage potential which reacts according to !nown non-linear optical (%>0) laws of physics. Cecause the ,oulomb gauge transverse potential (, A) e3ists in all of space-time (also standard physics), small amounts of e3cess potential occur naturally in all semiconductors. his interferes with applied #M potential, and causes 1noise1, which is normally filtered out. hus, semiconductors are natural scalar interferometers which translate low level amounts of e3cess potential. When two or more semiconductors are connected, directly or indirectly in a conductive path, a hyperspatial lin! is formed and the translated e3cess potential will bounce bac! and forth between them within this lin!, which can produce laser beams. 0r, the energy may reach the level sufficient to destroy one or more devices, or to destroy the semiconductors in the test e&uipment attached to the circuit. his is fully documented in the >awandy e3periment at Crown 4niversity and described in the March -/, /JJ7 issue of %ature Maga'ine. A 1ping pong1 effect occurs with semiconductors which have 1self-targeted1 each other, creating spurious bursts of normal #M energy. ,redit for all of the above information to om Cearden, who !indly provided it after years of study and research.

%ow we have two 1theories1 to describe one effect (li!ely there will be many more) so we have to find one that wor!s, in terms of being consistent and reproducible. *t is, * believe, both. he 1earth1 theory is the 1outer1 or normal #M description, since we are dealing with #M to drive a motor load. he Cearden theory is the 1inner1 description, and provides mathematical e3actness to the process. We used the 1outer1 theory to find the lattice structures, resonant octave ranges and >, relationship of the MRA. hat still leaves us with the unseen mechanism by which e3cess potential is reali'ed in the circuit. hat is where Cearden6s 1inner channel1 theory fills the void in understanding with clarity and precision. *t is really neither Mhos nor negative resistance as * understand it, but the translation of low-level , A energies into usable #M. he aspect of the MRA which is uni&ue is that it traps this potential and puts it to wor! driving a load instead of building up and creating a %>0 laser effect. * believe that the energies, as soon as they are translated into #M, are 1caught1 by the magnet and pulled into the resonant circuit, where they are measured as e3cess potential. * hope that this message ends up on the *-%et, as it will provide the references within conventional, accepted physics that can be studied in order to visuali'e the functioning of the MRA. L "oel Message /.-9; (./D.-DJ: /7B78) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB MRA ech %otes (i %orm L * wound (looser than normal) another MRA using W88 stranded wire, the wire with the purple insulation. *t also has a step-down ratio, but with more turns that the first MRA. *t is only /./- N unity at ma3 power, but detunes to /8.;: N unity under a motor load. his is much better than either of the ones sent to Walter or to om. his MRA will push the input voltage up to over /.:@A, over no-load, while still powering the motor, which means that it has more e3cess potential than either of the others, and this shows up in the 8J.. ohms of effective impedance at the ma3 gain setting. Also, since some pie'os wor! well and others don6t, *6m trying to locate the variable which determines this. *n measuring the capacitance of the good pie'o in the current MRA, it shows definite variance in capacitance when you reverse the leads from the meter. *t measures :nf in one direction, and -nf when the meter leads are reversed. ,omparing this with other pie'os in the 1re)ect1 pile, most have lower capacitance and little if any difference when the leads are reversed. * thin! that this is related to the poling of the pie'os... possibly it is lost on some in the process of soldering them. L "oel Message /.-;/ (./D.-DJ: /;B//) <rom B %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA CillB When you get the MRA * sent to you, chec! the windings for solid wire. *f * wound yours with solid wire )ust strip it off and rewind with fine stranded 88 Fa. with the same W of turns or you could e3periment. L %orm

Message /.-;2 (./D.7DJ: ..B-2) <romB Cill Ceaty oB All Gub)ectB MRA ClunderKKK * )ust noticed a big 0ooopsI in the MRA files. he <lu!e 2; rue RMG meter specs in the <lu!e catalog are listed as 8.$(' ma3. * don6t !now if this means the tolerance is only good to that point, or whether that is the half-power point. * don6t have the complete spec. his implies that the meter is not good to 8..$(' as was said earlier, and its possible that all the readings ta!en with it are wrong. What say youK (ave you tried crude calibrations of this meter versus a scope, when both read the output of a good oscillator that6s fairly constant with fre&uencyK ,ould you do a cross-chec! to find out where the meter readings get R#A>>5 badK Message /.-27 (./D.7DJ: .;B7/) <romB %orman Wootan oB Ferald 06+ocharty Gub)ectB My MRA Ferald L Well, 1 race Mountain1 is going to get a care pac!age, for we can6t have esla e3perimenting with inferior parts. (aI (aI "ust !idding, will send you the 1real1 thing to e3periment with. We have been using filters on the +, bridge, mine is bigger than "oel6s cap for * have been useing /9... 4< R 9.@ while "oel is using something smaller. he only problem with a big cap is you have to be a little more patient with changing values and ad)ustments for it ta!es a little time for the cap to bleed of or build up with variations in the output but it is 1pure1 +,. All the measurements are cross chec!ed by scope and the +, out from a filtered bridge is flat line +,. 5ou are correct with the pie'o fre&s for most of these circuits settle out with a pie'o fre& around -79.. range which is a fifth (/D:) of the ferro-magnetic-resonant fre& that we derived. * wish someone else would do some testing in this area to verify our findings. When you get your 1 # 1 finished you can do the same test we did and see where and how this was done. Go far everything goes bac! to this fundamental fre& which * am still convinced that esla !new full well when he built his ,olorado Gprings coil. Gounds reasonable to me that he would use a fre& very close to the natural earth ferro magnetic resonant fre& to form a beat difference of the ;.2- (that6s close enough) which is the Gchuman cavity resonant fre&. Cac! then he had it close to 2 (' and since it has been narrowed down even better. his would have been an 1elegant1 approach to form an 2 (' standing wave between his big coil, the earth and the surrounding air. * would li!e to get the 1,orum6s1 feed bac! or comments on this idea. han!s for the interest in the MRA, good to hear from the 1attic wor!shop1. 5our friend L %orm Message /.-2: (./D.7DJ: .2B./) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA Cill L We are chec!ing the numbers from the meters with scope bac!-up so we feel comfortable so far with the measurements. "oel6s total resistive e&uivalence to the circuit places everything bac! on 10(MG >AW1 for cross chec!ing and verification. What can you do with an animal that is so non-linear that everything is inverted or does )ust the

opposite that you would normally e3pect from a circuit. Well, the proof is in the hands of Walter Rosenthal and om Cearden at this time and soon will be on (al Authoff6s wor! bench so what else can we do other than what is already reported. 5our &uestion as to telling all, that has been the policy all along for "oel and * agree that it is dumb to go 1Aublic +omain1 then hold bac! critical data that would impair duplication efforts of others. Alease share 1all1 tech notes and comments with everyone for even the smallest clue could turn on the 1light1 in someone else mind and assist to overall pro)ect. (ec!, we admit we don6t have all the answers, that is the reason for ma!ing this a )oint pro)ect with all interested in a new form of energy. L %orm Message /.-2; (./D.7DJ: //B82) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Ferald 06+ocharty Gub)ectB A>G0 0 C*>> C#A 5... (i Ferald L 5up, we6ve been using ordinary electrolytic filter caps on the output of the bridge, same as with any other power supply. We can do this because -7$(' is still well within the alpha cutoff fre& of diodes and audio transistors. Food that %orm is sending you a !it, because if your magnet is not ringing audibly, you aren6t going to get the effect of virtual rotation of the domains, and will have an ordinary series resonant circuit. <rom what we6ve seen, you have to have the magnet resonant range in the first octave of a three octave series. he magnet6s range is about 2-J$(', so one octave up is /9-/2$(' and the ne3t octave is -8--9$(', with the pie'o right in the middle of its range at about -7$(' PD- a few hundred hert'. *n answer to Cill6s &uestion, * rechec!ed the 10wner6s Manual1 for the <lu!e W2;, and it definitely says 8..$('... in fact, while you are measuring voltage with it, you can press the 1(H1 button and get an instantaneous reading of fre& and if you press it again get a reading of the duty cycle. *t6s a great piece of gear. Also, since %orm and * have both blown up test e&uipment with the MRA, it6s a lot less to ris! for routine measurements. *f you caught that last message for Cob Aaddoc!, you have a better idea of the reason for measuring primary current with a resistive e&uivalent circuit. here is a scalar to #M conversion going on which manifests itself as circulating current... Cearden calls it a 1ping pong1 effect, as the 1inner channel1 increase is bounced bac! by the resonant circuit, causing yet another increase, and so on. he components themselves and the amount of load determine amount of this current. (owever, adding a series dropping resistor effectively alters the circuit by closing the channel, which is why primary current from the signal source increases, a direct violation of 0hm6s >aw (increasing resistance should decrease current) and the result is an ordinary series resonant circuit. *6m going to try to get some of the info from om Cearden into a file because he can describe the effects with far more scientific authenticity than * have the !nowledge or e3perience to do. L "oel Message /.-J8 (./D.7DJ: /;B-/) <rom B "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB he <lu!e ain6t a flu!e...

a!en from the <lu!e W2; 0wner6s ManualB *ntroduction, Aage /B 1 he <lu!e 2; rue RMG Multimeter is a handheld, 7... count instrument that is designed for use in the field, laboratory, and at home. he meter combines the precision of a digital meter with the speed and versatility of a high resolution analog display. <re&uencies between ..: (' and 8.. !(' can be measured with up to .../ (' resolution. (ow to 4se the Meter, Aage /8B 1*n the fre&uency counter mode, the (' annunciator is displayed. he fre&uency function autoranges over five rangesB /JJ.JJ (', /JJJ.J (', /J.JJJ !(', /JJ.JJ !(', and greater than 8..!('.1 (ope this clears up the &uestion of fre& accuracy... * also ran the Gimpson W;/. fre& counter along with the <lu!e W2; and they trac! well together, and the voltages have been 6scoped for amplitude also. With the types of e&uipment that you would find in most good electronic shops, we believe that the data that we have released (which is everything we !now, as fast as we !now it) is accurate and valid. We are typically measuring voltages at fre&6s that are in the bottom one fifth of the meter6s fre& range. L "oel Message /.7.9 (./D.7DJ: /JB/;) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB * G## (# >*F( I (i %orm L o test Cearden6s %>0 theory, i.e., A-channel &uantum potentials forming at light wavelengths, * loosely wrapped a strip of aluminum foil around the windings of the MRA. his will have little or no effect on a conventional transformer, e3cept to shield it from ambient noise as in @ 4(< circuits. (owever, the MRA output dropped from /9.8:@+, at ./7A to /...@+, at ./7A... my goodness. L "oel Message /.7/; (./D.:DJ: ./B/7) <romB Cill Ceaty oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB (R) he <lu!e ain6t a flu!e... Whew, sigh of relief. * don6t have the specs, but it sounds li!e your meter is good for voltage up to 8.$(', then is not accurate at higher fre&uencies to the full number of meter digits. Go, accuracy depends on how fast the meter response tails off above 8.$('. And the <lu!e literature +0#G say 8..$(' for the fre&uency counter, but 8.$(' for the @rms part. * hate to be finding fault with your measurements, but *6m really )ust trying to get more confidence in what you are seeing (until * get a chance to try it myself.). *t still probably would be a good idea to measure voltage of a good source with both the scope and the meter, and find where the meter starts to fail. <or e3ample, when does its reading dip :O below that of a :.M(' scopeK At 8/$('K Arobably not. At/.. $('K ,ould well be. Message /.782 ./D.:DJ: /-B8/) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) Gub)ectB (owdy

(i "erry L *6ve been getting messages from you...but not returning any as of yet because *6ve been in constant 1test mode1 with the MRA. *6m sure that you have some concerns along with a very full agenda, so *6ll not as! any favors at this point. We6ve really only )ust begun with the MRA. * see now that it is possible to add additional &uantum coupled stages. Cecause the coupled potentials are instantaneous in the self-targeting mode, they can be effectively added in --space to reali'e #M power outside the A-channel. What is different in this 1mode1 is that voltages in parallel will 1add1, and voltages in series will stay the same, albeit at e3cess potential. With one output on the MRA, we are limited to one set of complete Whitta!er biwave harmonic pairs. #ach load will have slightly different characteristics...and will 1attract1 other biwave pairs in the MRA, as long as the loads are within the aggregate resonance. * believe that this is similar to the concept used by Moray, with charge coupled stages, or for that matter, with $eely in his use of se&uentially applied vibrations. #ach turn of wire around a esla coil, or each crossover of a caduceus coil is the same in effect. he materials in the MRA are all optically active, which engages them in the A-channel via the , A process. *f light is reflected away from the MRA, or if it is optically shielded, it loses all effect. <or the record, however, we have seen most, if not, all of the 1anomalous1 criteria associated with unity P devices. he pie'o will lose weight. ,loc!s and watches run slow. Gome wires in the series path stay cool. And, of course, there6s the matter of e3cess potential above no-load. And still, we6ve only begun. he design is three wee!s old. *6ve refused to download the *-%et data, because * feel very strongly about !eeping focused, and don6t need to hear all of ,#M 1rules1 repeated, as if * had never heard them before, nor the condescension of fools in their glory. >et them en)oy their moment, as <aust did his. L "oel Message /.7-9 (./D.9DJ: .8B/9) <romB "ohn Aeters oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB (R) MRA as a 1solar1 device "oel? your message (/./22) made me thin! of what is in WCGM#M0.AG,. * have been intrigued by this file, and where it spea!s of e3tracting power from the #arth6s magnetic field sounds li!e how you e3plained the MRA. he actual &uote is 1 he design has now been completed for a unit which should be self-sustaining and in addition provide a small surplus of power. Guch a unit, in addition to functioning as a 6pilot power plant6 should permit the study of the various reaction forces which are e3pected to develop.1 +o you thin! that Gmith6s device is along the same lines as the MRAK Message /.7-; (./D.9DJ: .9B:.) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB (R) MRADGweet coil

ZZZZnnnnnnnZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZnnnnnnnZZZZZ S SSSSSSS % % % SSSSSSS S S SSSSSSS MAF%# SSSSSSS S S SSSSSSS SSSSSSS S SuuuuuuuZZZZZZGZZZZZGZZZZZGZZZZuuuuuuuZZZZZS S S S S S ,oilS S ,oilS S / S S 8 S S SZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZS S S S S S o o 5ou )ust redrew ,oler6s 1Magnetstromapparat1I @ery nice art by the way... Message /.77; (./D.9DJ: .JB/:) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB MRA ech %ote >ast night %orm was over and we added another output to the MRA, so that it was driving lights (incandescent and fluorescent) in addition to the usual motor load. his re&uired retuning the MRA for ma3imum power to match the new load re&uirement. We were 1overdriving1 the output of the MRA below unity to 1ma3 out1 the power to the load. After the lights were removed so that only the motor was on the output, the MRA was retuned for the motor, but the resonant fre&uency had changed. Arior to adding the lights, the resonant fre&uency was -7.82 !('. After removing the lights, it was --.7!('. Although this is only a difference of 2:. (', it is interesting as it indicated that the MRA is alterable. his might be useful in some applications. he MRA still detunes for ma3 gain as before, and still provides surplus potential (/.:@A, above noload) when detuned, but this is the first indication that it can also be R#tuned to a new resonant center fre&uency. Apparently, the magnetic core is more 1permeable1 than we had thought. Message /.7:. (./D.9DJ: /.B-J) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB "ohn Aeters Gub)ectB mmmmm....could beI Went bac! and read the WCGM#M0.AG, file again... memory ain6t what it used to be, and never was. * hadn6t thought of the MRA within the conte3t of that file, but you are right on the mar! with your comparison. he biggest hurdle to understanding the MRA is in seeing it as a new device via e3isting technology. *t is a different technology, actually a very, very old technology using new components. (owever, because the technology isn6t in the 1boo!s1 yet, it is viewed (at best) as a 1new1 technology.

he e3isting 1rules1 don6t apply...but the old, really old rules do. <or e3ample, when (eaviside bastardi'ed Ma3well6s heories (you will %0 find the (eaviside interpretation in A%5 of Ma3well6s published wor!s), (eaviside stripped out all of the references to the ether, which he said was 1mystical and should be murdered from the theory1, and so he murdered the ether...e3cept that it )ust wouldn6t dieI Ma3well opened the door to A-channel &uantum potentials, and (eaviside slammed it shut. (eaviside wanted to provide simple 1laws1 so that the electricians of that day could vector power and measure current in wor!able systems. (eaviside never went to college, did not !now calculus, and was lost in the true implications of Ma3well6s theory. *t6s time we moved up to the reality of A>> of Ma3well6s theory, not )ust the !indergarten version. Anyway, * got side trac!ed...bac! to your &uestion. Without having seen the WCG device, it6s hard to say for sure, but the effects seem similar. he *% #% of the MRA was to design a device compatible with naturally occurring energies, specifically ferroresonance as it applies to earth6s electromagnetic fields. (owever, in +0*%F this, especially with optically sensitive materials, we enabled the MRA to re-open Ma3well6s door. What we caused was a lin! to form which translated etheric energy into ordinary #M in a closed loop resonant circuit. his lin! is referred to as the 1A-channel1, because it manifests as e3cess potential. his effect has been e3perienced in semiconductor circuits for many years, and is normally destructive to the devices, so resistive and filtering components are added to effectively 1close1 the channel. his isn6t necessarily bad, because until circuits can be designed to 4G# the e3cess potentials, we don6t want them going into resonance and burning out. As seen by the %eiperDGei!e Ring (the schematic that is on $eely%et is wrong, btw), you also e3perience gravitic effects when you allow tetrahedral lattices to self-resonate. ,onsidering that the MRA at resonance is virtually stopping the spin of particles (li!e a strobe synchroni'ed to a timing mar!), it is very li!ely that a more efficient MRA could cancel the &uadrupole effect of gravity. here are other ways of doing this, such as the Ciefield-Crown method of high potential or the Gearl method of folding energy onto itself in resonant plasma layers, and possibly the technology of anti-g (for a practical space ship) would utili'e some or all of the above. (owever, we6ll never get 1there1 from 1here1 by using the (eaviside 1laws1. ,onventional science has a 1circle the wagons1 mentality to this new (old) technology, and insists on trying to hammer the wheel bac! into a s&uare, on the assumption that it will 1wor!1 better because roads are flat. Go we clun! along and congratulate ourselves on our 1vast1 achievements. 0$, *6ll get bac! down off the soap bo3... We6ll drag them by the ear if necessary, !ic!ing and screaming all the way, and force them to re-open Ma3well6s door. L "oel Message /.7:7 (./D.9DJ: /9B-2) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB est Report

oB (al Authoff L (i (al, 5es, you are correct about the motor current. We chec!ed it with an analog meter early on in the tests, and it indicated /7. ma. his was then used as a constant. (owever, * )ust rechec!ed it with the <lu!e 2; inline to the motor, and the true +, current varies from /8. ma at ma3 power to //9 ma at ma3 gain. As for the output switching, we are trying to determine the actual primary circuit current of the MRA. 0nce we have tuned the MRA, we remove it from the output of the signal source, and connect the signal source to the decade bo3. 0nce we measure the amount of resistance re&uired to attain the same drop in amplifier output voltage as the MRA was causing, we then can divide resistance into voltage to determine the current draw of the MRA. We6ve tried other methods, such as low values of resistance in the primary of the MRA, and the results defy ohm6s law. Adding resistance actually increases primary current...which should also increase secondary output, but in fact, causes it to decrease. As you will see, the current in series with a resistor in the primary circuit is higher than the current with )ust a meter in series with the primary, which ma!es no sense in terms of classical #M theory. We believe that the resistor is closing the 1A-channel1, which removes the source of e3cess potential. #ven the slight resistance of the meter, or of a current probe which contains a coil, will have the same effect in varying degrees. Go, we use the decade bo3 as an e&uivalent load, instead. Also, %orm and * put a very heavy combination of output loads on the MRA last night to see how much power we could e3tract from it, regardless of gain. his e3periment lasted for about an hour. After we were finished, we found that the center resonant fre&uency of the MRA had changed from -7.82 to --.72 with )ust the motor on the output. Apparently, the magnetic core is more 1permeable1 than we had thought. Go, here are the new measurements, factoring in the measured motor current and the 1new1 center resonant fre&uencyB MRA W- est +ata est +ate "anuary 9, /JJ: Ma3imum Aower ModeB Resonant fre&uency = --.72 !(' *nput signal with noload (MRA not connected) = 89.J; @A, MRA output load = Aittman +, motor, /J./ @+, R /8. ma. *nput signal with MRA connected and powering motor = 8:.-J @A, *nput signal amplitude reduction as per above = /.:2 @A, Measured e&uivalent resistance to achieve /.:2 @A, drop = 8.. ohms RMG input power R 8.. ohms = 8.82 W MRA output = /2.-: @+, N /8. ma = 8.8. W Ma3imum Fain ModeB Resonant fre&uency = --.-7 !(' *nput signal with noload (MRA not connected) = 8;./- @A, MRA output load = same Aittman motor R//9 ma *nput signal with MRA connected and powering motor = 89.22 @A, *nput signal amplitude reduction as per above = ..8: @A, Measured e&uivalent resistance to achieve ..8: @A, drop = /9.. ohms RMG input power R /9.. ohms = -/J mw MRA output = /:.: @+, N //9 ma = /.2. W

%otesB his data uses inline current measurements for +, output at both the ma3imum power and ma3imum gain settings of the MRA. he center resonant fre&uency has changed from the previously measured data of "anuary -, /JJ:, and was still continuing to change (upward) even as these measurements were being ta!en. *t may eventually rise to the original measured fre&uency of -7.82 !('. he ma3imum gain measurement of primary current using a decade bo3 was ta!en in a linear area of potential which would show a voltage drop with the MRA in the circuit. <urther decreasing fre&uency will cause the voltage from the signal source to increase above the no-load voltage, in which case it is not !nown how to measure input power to the MRA. Message /.7;; (./D.;DJ: /.B.7) <rom B "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB Geeing is Celieving L *ncandescent lamp test here is a very easy method for 1seeing1 the power gain of the MRA, and it does not re&uire power amplifiers, only a sine wave generator. 5ou need two of the tiny 1grain of wheat1 lamps...if you don6t have them on hand, * will send you some. Aut one lamp is series with the input to the MRA primary, and put the other lamp in series with the MRA secondary to the bridge rectifier. *f you are not using an amplifier, put a :.-/.. ohm resistive load on the output of the bridge rectifier. *f you are using an amplifier, use more resistance to avoid burning out the lamps. 4sing only a signal generator for the MRA input, tune the MRA to pea! resonance. he lamp in the primary circuit will not illuminate, but the lamp in the secondary circuit will begin to glow. he glow is bright enough to photograph for your records of this test. *f you are using an amplifier, do not put the lamps in the circuit until you have detuned the MRA for ma3 gain. hen put them in, and you will see that the secondary lamp is much brighter than the primary lamp. 5ou can continue to detune until the primary lamp is 1out1 (at which point the input voltage from the amp is above no-load) but the secondary lamp is still glowing. * suggest that light sensitive devices could be used with the lamps to measure gains in terms the output of these devices. (owever, * still have no idea of how to measure gain once the primary lamp is 1out1 and the secondary lamp is still lit. L "oel Message /.7J8 (./D.2DJ: //B.:) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA Aarts CillB * sent a pac!age of MRA info to +on Gmith down in (ouston for he has a similar circuit to the MRA e3cept that it uses a esla coil running at high voltages to interact with the earth6s wea! ferro-magnetic field to produce over-unity operation. A lot of people have practically given up on +on6s device for he has not powered a practical load

to date that we !now of but his theory is sound as far as * can determine. An incorporation of what we have learned about ferro-magnetic resonance fre&uencies and his esla coil driven circuit could provide another effective method of HA# tapping. +on has done some research on the pie'o material and pinned down three current manufacturers of these transducers. he first is A++,(#M a spin off from the A#%WA> family. hen there is G0>@A and $#RRA. (e also went to the specialty wire manufacturers and as!ed about ma!ing a pie'o type conductor that could be incorporated directly into our circuits. he wire manufacturers were amused to say the least for their comments were 1we have been wor!ing all these years to ma!e a wire that produced no noise and you come along and as! for a degenerate conductor that will ma!e ma3imum noise1. hey are interested in the concept though and will get bac! to us with the data needed. * would not be too &uic! to )udge the MRA as a non-reproducable device for between "oel and * we have built 2 of the units and have been able to achieve the over-unity ratios that we are comfortable with. he biggest problem that * see is that no one wants to ta!e the time to do the necessary reading of the messages, tech reports and go out and find the materials. We clearly stated that we do not have all the answers and have not nailed down e3actly what will or will not wor! as to magnet type or shape. he pie'o is a big variable for we have a stac! of culls which )ust will not wor!. We e3pect that they have lost the poling that was done at time of manufacturer. * !now that there is someone out there on the *nternet who has e3perience in this area. +an +avidson told me that to the best of his !nowledge the poling is done at the 1curie point1 of the pie'o material with a capacitive discharge used to establish the re&uired 1polarity of charge1. *f anyone out there has !nowledge in this area please give us some input so we can revive some of these 1dead1 pie'o6s. *6m sure others will encounter this problem so we need more !nowledge about the pie'o element. Gince the 1"ury1 is still out as far as testing is concerned we have to wait but in the meantime "oel and * are still building more wor!ing devicesX L %orm Message /.:.2 (./D.JDJ: .2B/8) <romB %orman Wootan oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB MRA "oel L Alnico 121 8..27 #3cess R -9/.. AB 72.9. > AB 8;.;9 %> X Geems that the harder the magnet material the closer we get to the natural resonance of the transducer. he MRA cannot tell the difference between materials. Gorry, 1Mother %ature1 made all magnetic flu3 the same 1hyperspatial1 fre&uency therefore the boy scout cannot tell the scout master that the reason he got lost was because his compass was not tuned to the right fre&uency. he MRA is capable of e3tracting or pair coupling in the 1A1 channel no matter what the source of magnetic flu3 be it the earth6s natural flu3 or some 1e3otic1 mi3 of elements we call super magnets. +on Gmith is going to love this for it vindicates his valiant efforts which appeared to be dashed on the roc!s of failure. 1R#G#AR,(1 is the !ey. L %orm Message /.:/: (./D.JDJ: //B7:) <romB Flenda Gtoc!s oB All Gub)ectB ReB 4pload of M*+#@*,.H*A

Gtewart (arris created a device about /J years ago, which he believes raised a mass via magnetic power (this is as * understand it). Gtewart understand how to ma!e his device based on a dream that he had, and so, he is also interested in discovering e3actly how this information came to him. %evertheless, he has the e3perts confounded as to whyDhow his device does what it does. his file M*+#@*,.H*A contains a series of message threads about his device and a video he has that demonstrates it. * will be happy to convey to Gtewart any comments or remar!s. L Flenda Message /.:7- (./D/.DJ: /8B.2) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB MRA lamp H test his report is here is because of the problems with measuring the primary current of this beast. he MRA adds voltage to the circuit, which is nice, but it creates A>> $*%+G of current measurement problems. Go, * have appended the 1grain of wheat1 lamp test to give real numbers instead of )ust seeing the difference in light. * put one of the lamps directly on the signal generator output, and measured its impedance at the fre&uency of the MRA under test. WhyK Well, because the lamp can thus be put into the primary, and when you measure the voltage drop across it, you can divide that by the impedance and $%0W the actual primary current... no need to worry about the e3cess voltage, because if any of it 1adds1 across the lamp, primary current will appear (*F(#R, which would reduce the gain of the MRA, and help to disprove it as an overunity device. *6ll ta!e that chance, as long as * !now the e3act impedance of the lamp. Also, where there is a difference in measured versus calculated output current, *6ve ta!en the lower number, also to be ultra-conservative. Go, here goesB he 1lamp test1 of the MRA has been further used for the purpose of standard 1ohm6s law1 tests and measurements. he 1bottom line1 figures are 7;... mw input to the primary of the MRA and ;:/.. mw output from the secondary. his is a gain of /.9 times unity at the low power end of the resonant range. he measurements and calculations are given belowB A, signal in = 82.J7 @A, under load of the MRA A, signal in = 82.:7 @A, without the MRA connected A, e3cess potential provided by the MRA = ..7. @A, A, signal at secondary = 2.97 @A, Measured secondary current = /8- ma @oltage drop across lamp = 8.J8 @A, ,alculated current = 8.J8 @A, U 8..;; ohms = /7. ma with an error margin of /; ma from measured current Gecondary power = 2.97 @A, times /8- ma times .;.; = ;:/ mw Culb impedance = 8..;; ohms at the fre& input to the MRA A, voltage drop across bulb in series with primary = ..7;. @A, Arimary current = ..7;. @A, U 8..;; ohms = ..889 Amperes Arimary power = ..889 Amperes times 82.J7 @A, times .;.; = 798 mw >amp power = ..889 Amperes times ..7;. @A, times ..;.; = ;.: mw

o cross chec! these numbers, the total primary impedance was calculated, and the impedance of the lamp was subtracted from it. *f accurate, the difference in power should e&ual the power which is added to the primary when the lamp is not connectedB Arimary impedance = 82.J7 @A, divided by ..889 Amperes = /82..:- ohms Gubtracting lamp impedance of 8..;; ohms = /8:J.;9 ohms Arimary power with lamp = 798 mw Arimary power without lamp = 82.J7 @A, divided by /8:J.;9 ohms = ..88J; Amperes times 82.J7 @A, = 99: times .;.; = 7;. mw ,alculated power of lamp = ;.: mw and under cross chec! it is e&ual to 7;. mw minus 798 mw = 2 mw, with an error margin of ..: mw CecauseB A. he lamp impedance was measured out of circuit at the fre&uency used in the circuit C. he same lamp impedance is used for both primary and secondary current measurements ,. Arimary power trac!s on cross chec!. herefore, +. Arimary power = 7;. mw * (*%$ that nails it...at least as far as can be measured with a low power lamp, and assuming that the MRA should eat any differences in measurement versus calculations which would reduce its gain. All of the measurements are in series for current, as per ohm6s law, and all other calculations are ohm6s 1to the letter1. As usual, my coffee got cold, so *6ll stop here. han! you for your continued indulgence. L "oel Message /.:72 (./D/.DJ: /7B:-) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB >amp H test followup "ust an addendum to the lamp impedance test report. <ound that the circuit would not stay at unity P indefinitely at that very low level of input. After about an hour, the voltage drop across the lamp in the primary went up to over a volt, and that !noc!ed the MRA down below unity. * thin! that the low level of input wasn6t enough to sustain the harmonics that had built up as the MRA was warming up. L "oel Message /.::/ (./D/.DJ: /;B-/) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB (R) MRA (Aower est) ReB A vacuum tube is the only animal that could survive the punishment in a high voltage circuit li!e this. Cob Aaddoc!6s indestructible transistors won6t cut it in this harsh environment. houghts and ideasB *6ve come across a couple of more transistors for crummy environments. Motorola6s M0G Gmartdiscret Aroducts. <or e3ample 7..@D/.A *FC , MFCA8.%7.,>DMFC8.%7.,>, 1designed primarily as ignition coil drivers to withstand high current in a pulsed mode with out latching.1 0r more interestingly the 9.@D/A M>A/%.9,> 1device that has integrated on-chip current limit capability, drain-to-source voltage clamping and gate voltage protection.1 Also %ational

Gemiconductor 10verture1 M MT Audio Aower Amplifier Geries with GAi$e M MT Arotection. 1 he performance of the 2;9D>M-229D>M-2;:D>M-2;9, utili'ing its Gelf Aea! *nstantaneous emperature (6$e) (GAi$eM MT) Arotection ,ircuitry, puts it in a class above discrete and hybrid amplifiers by providing an inherently, dynamically protected Galve 0peration Area (G0A). Gpi$e Arotection means that these parts are completely safeguarded at the output against over voltage, under voltage, overloads, including shorts to the supplies, thermal runaway, and instantaneous temperature pea!s.1 Gpecs are 8:W to /:.W (+epending on part number) of continuous average power to 2 ohm load with ...9O ( (+P%) from 8. ('-8.$('. Message /.::- (./D/.DJ: /;B-:) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB (R) MRA ech %otes * thin! that this is related to the poling of the pie'os... possibly it is lost on some in the process of soldering them. * tal!ed with some one who was familiar with 4ltrasonic Welding. hey said that the pie'os where typical compressed with a rubber compression setup, and contact was made with brass springs. Would this wor! betterDworse than solderingK 5et another point to e3periment with... Message /.:9J (./D//DJ: .;B-:) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cob Aaddoc! Gub)ectB MRA Cob L han!s a million for the pac!age and the schematics. *6m very interested in the 1high performance1 transistors so * really appreciate your search efforts. he magnets are bonded together so don6t try to separate them for they brea! very easily. As to the transducers "oel and * have not figured out the ..; figure. *n the batch * bought they were sorted out and grouped under that number, i.e., all the ..;6s were together then there would be a group of ..J6s etc. Gome sort of matching they did at manufacturing. * guess they were installed in the welders in matched sets so as to have the highest performance. he brass strip method of providing electrical contact wor!s for * have several mounted this way in between two pressure plates so * can tor&ue them down to about /.. W pressure which +an +avidson recommended * try. he other train of thought is to ma!e the contacts in a way as to allow the pie'o to freely resonate in free air with minimum contact at any point. Goldering directly to the silver surface is detrimental to the pie'o as evidenced by our stac! of 1dead transducers1. hey are in effect almost a pure capacitive device and will give off a very loud 1s&ueal1 when they go 1sour1 and &uit wor!ing. * !now that someone who wor!s with these devices will eventually 1)ump in1 and educate us about these animals. he sooner the better. hese 10#M1 items are always li!e that for they are manufactured for use in a specific piece of e&uipment with precise specs. We come along and try to adapt this device to one of our e3periments out of convenience sine we pic!ed them up surplus. his is 0$ for e3perimentation and all out there should reali'e the facts behind what * said. When &uestions arise as to data on the transducers * would say that we really don6t !now what

we are dealing with but they wor!. When we get further along and get some 1optimum1 numbers we may be able to go to the original 10#M1 source and have some super pie'o6s designed that will target the performance curves that we develop through trial and error. *t would be nice if there was a computer program that could analy'e the MRA parameters and design the optimum pie'o characteristics we need. Right now all we can say is that in a circuit that does everything 1contrary1 to accepted electronic and physics theory we can6t get a handle on e3act and optimum design characteristics. *t will eventually ta!e a team of speciali'ed engineers to figure out how to ta!e this MRA idea and ma!e it do useful wor!. All we have done is open the 1door1 to the fact that tapping the Hero Aoint is real and can be demonstrated. Where and how this is developed remains to be seen. 0nce the fundamental theory is proven then very large sums of capital will be thrown into research and all this will become reality. All we could do was give the info to the world and let smarter fol!s run with it to it6s useful application in solving our energy problems. What more can * say. han!s again Cob and good luc! with your MRA. L %orm Message /.:J. (./D/8DJ: .JB8.) <romB Cill Ceaty oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB (R) MRA Aarts * got your pac!age Monday, and have spent a few hours messing with it. (A%$GI #3cellent pac!aging )ob, nothing damaged at all. *t seems that my signal generator can6t put out a high enough voltage to get the effect to !ic! in. %e3t *6m going to get a friend6s ,arver amp. My Wavete! at wor! puts out 8. @pp, but it gets pulled down to 2@pp at resonance, and the energy throughput is totally conventionalB e3actly /..O at resonance, and falling fast at other fre&uencies. he magnet does %0 ma!e any noise, and all the signals in the circuit are pure sine waves, without any other fre&uencies. * have brochures on the way from five separate AH manufactures, so * should get some info on 1poling.1 Gpea!ing of whichB the pie'os themselves behave very strange near resonance. All !inds of pure tones appear, and turn on and off when fre&uency or voltage is varied. he best fre& for this seems to be a bit higher than the resonance pea!. * saw signals start small and slowly grow, then vanish when the pie'o is touched, only to slowly grow again. * got the 1death1 effect, when the pie'o ma!es a screech and then the sounds vanish for about a half hour. @ery similar to that @Y opto-isolator device. Also similar to nonlinear optical crystals illuminated with laser light, where conventional phase con)ugation creates closed reflection paths, optical resonances, selforgani'ed hologram elements, etc. * wouldn6t be surprised if the innards of the pie'os were doing the acoustic version of this. * notice that when a pie'o is being silent, sometimes * can get it to sound wea!ly by applying slight pressure to the leads. *t seems that tiny bending forces have a great effect on pie'o audible 1subharmonic1 sounds. * wonder if your pie'o 1culls1 could be made to wor! by pulling or pushing )ust right on the lead wires. Also, the 1culls1 may generate a set of fre&uencies that )ust by coincidence miss the magnet resonant fre&uency, so they are too far off for the pie'o and magnet fre&uencies to grab each other and start tal!ing. he cure for this might be to grind little flat areas on the edges to retune them. * have a couple of ceramic slab magnets, so * built a ple3i form and wound a coil around it, with the magnet suspended inside. With an e3tremely tiny signal applied to the coil at

//$(' the magnet rings @#R5 loud (and annoyingI) *f * touch the corners of the magnet slab, the ringing goes way down and the tuning is much broader. *nstead of suspending the magnet, * found that soft foam rubber does not interfere much with the ringing of either the magnet or the pie'o. his ma!es sense, since foam is mostly air, so the magnet thin!s its hanging in air. More soon... Message /.:J: (./D/8DJ: /.B88) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA Aarts Cill L Flad you got everthing 1intact1 and you are progressing with your research. *f you stic! strictly to the R4>#J doc. and ma!e the magnet resonate (about 2-2.:$ audible) you will find the pie'o running at e3actly - octaves up or around -7--:$(H. 0nly under these conditions will you achieve the 1virtual rotation1 within the crystalline lattice of the magnet material. ,hec! out the 1#1 message from "oel about the phone call from the engineers at >oc!eed ,orp that verify that the MRA does achieve overunity for they are getting /7.O and congratulate us on our output figures. hey said that some Ferman and Russian engineers have achieved similar results also. >ast night * got a call from an engineer down in ,learwater <> who is getting /8:O and is not even using the 1cadillac1 pie'o6s that we are using. he iron content of the ferro magnet material seems to be the !ey to the gains. *t all goes bac! to what esla claimed when he said 1A fine grade of steel will play a very important part in tapping an infinite source of energy for iron is a uni&ue element in that it has 8 free electrons in the 1M1 shell of the atom that can be e3tracted for use only to be replenished by the ether1. About the document scan, * really appreciate your efforts with this for in the near future you will see where this is going. Cy the way, * sent Fene Mallove a set of the messages and all the info on the Aer!ins Aump and my ,old <usion test, etc. his will eventually all be tied in a nice little pac!age for it all goes bac! to "oel6s R4>#J document. Alease send down the scan so * can see it. Maybe with the ne3t *-net download would be fine. As to the *-net dialog, the worm seems to be turning. his 1Rodney1 in the Ciology Froup is simply going to G(-- when he reads the (4+G0% file from $eely%et. What about posting something for the Ciologist to chew on and &uit griping about your postings. Real soon they will wa!e up and reali'e the tie-in to their world. More later 1flac! ta!er1, (eI (eI han!s again. L %orm Message /.9-. (./D/-DJ: /2B./) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB 5our Message W /.:2J (i Cill L * almost missed the A.G. after your message W /.:2J. he source of the harmonics is the same as the source of the surplus potential. <rom $eely, we learned the importance of three octaves in order to lin! up with the ether. <rom Cearden, we learned that the harmonics are (Whitta!er) biwave pairs, and that the ether conforms to the ,oulomb ransverse Aotential. Go, when the re&uisite criteria is met, the biwave pairs vector into --space energy at the harmonic fre&uencies. hat6s it.

he rest of the MRA theory is resonance theory, as is the Rule of %ines, and e3ists to describe how to use naturally occurring lattice structures to mimic earth (and any other #M generator) in terms of the nested tetrahedral relationships. Why three octavesK Cecause we e3ist in --space, and we are creating a ;-space effect, with the fourth dimension, or p-channel, acting as a conduit into (and out of) --space. %ow, a trained observer will want to see e3actly where the harmonic biwave translation occurs, and ill go nuts loo!ing, because the wave pairs e3ist simultaneously with our space-time and translate instantaneously...no speed of light re&uired. Why nested tetrahedral relationshipsK Cecause they are the geometric relationships which embody A(*, and A(* is the pure mathematical constant to create resonance... musical, or any other type. hat is why you see the e3cess potential at the load and source simultaneously, and it is load dependent to the e3tent that the load affects harmonic interaction of the magnetic core. hat is why you have to lower gain of the MRA to close the p-channel by removing the e3cess potential first. 5ou can6t see the translation, only you can only see the effect. * loo! forward @#R5 M4,( to your tests and comments. L "oel Message /.9-7 (./D/7DJ: .2B8:) <romB %orman Wootan oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB MRA "oel L %ew winding set upB Ca<e magnet, AWM style /29. /D71 ribbon braided tinned conductor for secondary, AWF 8. Fa. stranded primary yielded, 7J.8.@ R 82.::@ sig for 8..9: e3cess potential R -9./2$(H. We will find that correct wire type and turns ratio yet. *6m using /.. on A and /.. on Gec. * have several more combo6s yet to try so will !eep you posted. L %orm Message /.97. (./D/7DJ: /.B7J) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB A(* and the MRA (i Cill L he last message wasn6t as clear as * would have li!ed with regard to A(*. * once wor!ed out the harmonic and octave relationships as A(* (and A*, since A* = A(* s&uared, times 9D:... thus A(* s&uared = A*...also, / P /DA(* = A(*, which is also !nown as the <ibonacci Geries). he file A(*QR#G.AG, has some of this information, and because the 1notes1 harmoni'e perfectly and the octaves double e3actly, this conforms to 1standard1 musical scales as are used today. 4sing the <ibonacci series as a starting place for note fre&uencies is not an arbitrary decision. oday, we see A(* as a methematical constant, ie, /.9/2, for use in plane geometry. o the ancient #gyptians, it was math but had a much deeper implicationX it was the symbol of rebirth throughout eternity )ust as the <ibonacci series 1perfects1 at higher number intervals. Also, because the use of A(* in art is very 1harmonious1 to view, A(*

coordinates (nested tets) were used by Michelangelo in the dome of the Gistine ,hapel, as well as by @eronese, Raphael, da @inci, and was even used by the architect >e ,orbusier in the design of the 4nited %ations building. *n retrospect, * thin! that this must be a perfect validation of the resonance based chart of the elements as created by Walter Russell, although he certainly doesn6t need any validation from me. he fact is, music is math and geometry, and geometry is the yardstic! for three dimensional e3istence. *t6s all one nested relationship, and the singular constant is A(*. *f you want to create resonance and balanced harmonics in octave groups, you must use A(*. Cecause we tend to separate 1music1 from 1science1, we don6t (#AR nature, and we trust our intellect to create unnatural yardstic!s. <act is, when computers were invented, and *CM needed programmers, they hired musicians to train for the positions. *n an electronic circuit, semiconductors are made of silicon or germanium, both of which are tet lattice structures, and both of which will occasionally brea! into free oscillation, rich in A(* based harmonics... that is how the %ieper ring wor!s, because once the material has three octaves of resonance, the particle spin is virtually stopped... li!e a timing mar! under a strobe...and the effect of gravity is suspended. hree octaves are necessary in --space because the each of the octaves 1fills1 one dimension. he octaves interact with each other to ma!e harmonics at J. degrees of phase separation, effectively 1filling1 a --space ob)ect. his is mass aggregate resonance, and it allows you to couple biwave vectorless energy into a circuit. *t also allows you to overcome temporal effects as well as gravitic effects. hat is why * said that when you nest two tets, you have the !eys to everything. he MRA uses materials which are cube latticed, and a cube *G a nested tet sitting on its 1flat side1. Go, when you trap the harmonics on one side of a phase reversed series resonant circuit, you develop a potential which is higher than the no-load voltage of the device which is supplying the circuit. hat6s half of HA#. he other half is having ferrite in the resonating core to provide electrons to match with the e3cess potential to create power to a load. And that6s the MRA. Aart of the resentment to this information is simply due to the fact that all of this was !nown to and possibly discovered by very ancient peoples...and we are lagging behind them today in our comprehension of science as nature, by the division of music and science, etc. Well, all * really wanted to do was to provide correlations to help tie in the octave relationships with the lattice geometry, and * hope that this information helps. 5ou can see how well it is received by most people, but you can also measure the e3cess potential on your own MRA so you6ll have to decide for yourself. Message /.999 (./D/:DJ: /-B8/) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB (R) MRA (Aower est) ReB A vacuum tube is the only animal that could survive the punishment in a high voltage circuit li!e this. Cob Aaddoc!6s indestructible transistors won6t cut it in this harsh environment. (ere6s a new one )ust out form (itachiB 1Robust :.W power

M0G<# s help reudce #M* <or safe electronic power switching for lamps, solenoids, electric heaters and motors in automobiles and industrial control systems, the (A<8../ power transistor is fully tolerant of short circuits and practically indestructible. 4nder conditions where traditional power transistor would fail and perhaps cause fires, it can turn off and remain off until reset, )ust li!e a circuit brea!er. he /.A silicon %-channel M0G<# also offers the tuning fle3ibility that is essential for reducing #M*. ailoring device6s rise time to the characteristics of a system achieves low #M* levels... (A<8../ has a /.A (*+) capability, 9@ @+GG (+rain-to-Gource brea!down voltage), P/9@D-8.2@ @FGG (Fate-to-Gource brea!down voltage) ratings, :.m0hm on-resistance, and switching times (t0%Dt0<<) as fast as 8JusD89us.1 Message /.9;2 ./D/9DJ: .8B:9) <romB "ohn Aeters oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB (R) mmmmm....could beI "oel L han!s for the insightful commentary. *6ve as!ed some math professors about Yuarterions and they haven6t heard of them. As * am now attending college fulltime, * will po!e around for some info on them. * have a couple of more things for you on the MRAB After studying the schematic for the MRA, * noticed that the 4ltrasonic transducer would have a very high electrical 1Y1. o get ma3imum power out of the circuit, * thin! the magnet and coil combination should also have as high a 1Y1 as possible. ,an a magnet have a 1Y1KK * understand that magnets seem to produce (resonate) an output near /;: $('. Would a stronger magnet put out a higher amplitude signal at /;: $('K * suspect the stronger magnet (higher gauss) would have an effectively higher 1Y1, thus possibly getting more out of the MRA. <or a given transducer, has anyone noted a leveling-off of output for increased strengths of magnets Message /.92. (./D/9DJ: .9B82) <romB %orman Wootan oB "ohn Aeters Gub)ectB MRA "ohn L Gince * have been doing the testing of different winding combo6s and magnet material while "oel is doing the performance testing * may be able to answer your &uestions as to a more powerful magnet material giving a better performance. hat ain6t the way it wor!s as far as we have been able to determine. We are dealing with a phenomenon here that is hard to grasp in that we are generating in the primary of the MRA circuit what we term as e3cess potential. his means that the voltage across the primary input to the MRA as coming from the signal source is driven up as much as /.J N. #3ampleB * have a MRA running as we spea! that has a signal source from the amp of 8..J: @A, R-9$(H no load (MRA out of the circuit). When * connect the MRA to the signal source the voltage goes up to -2.8; @A, for an e3cess potential of /;.-8 @. While stronger magnet material such as alnico 2 and neodymium increase the e3cess potential seen in the circuit we have not been able to translate it into a useable output. Gtill some matching problems that we may be able to wor! out and be able to utili'e these other magnet types. We believe the answer lies in the looseness of the domains in the magnet and their ability to oscillate so we get the 1virtual rotation1 we are loo!ing for. *6m sure that all this will be wor!ed out and it may be possible to use anything that has a magnetic field including the 1old mother earth1. he whole idea of going 1public

domain1 was to get others to e3periment with the circuit so we could sort all this out faster. *f "oel and * can find this phenomenon then others should be able to help us 1flesh it out1 into something useful. My friend Mi!e down in ,learwater <> (one of +on $elly6s group) has a MRA running at unity but he has not seen the e3cess potential that * described therefore this is an indication that his pie'o is not up to 1snuff1. We have found that the pie'o is very sensitive in that it can lose it6s poling when you solder the input leads to it. "oel and * have a stac! of pie'o6s that )ust will not show the overunity we are loo!ing for while others wor! )ust fine. <or this reason we have gone to *nternet in search for someone who has e3tensive !nowledge of pie'o6s and their applications. hus far we have had no responses. Alease e3periment and help the cause. L %orm Message /.92: (./D/9DJ: //B82) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB "ohn Aeters Gub)ectB (R) mmmmm....could beI (i "ohn, L Foing to college full time and still finding time to as! &uestions outside of your designated curriculumK *6m impressed. *6ll try to ma!e the answers worthy of the &uestions. he Y of the circuit, li!e any series resonant circuit at resonance, is very high. he MRA output follows the contours of the 4niversal Resonance ,hart for series resonant circuits, e3cept for the point of intersection with input current. he current is forced low while still in the area of its linear rise according to the chart, and is at minimum at the 9:O point where it should be at the 1!nee1 of its pea! rise. hat is manifested as a very high circuit impedance, for as you !now, a series resonant circuit is supposed to be a dead short at resonance e3cept for copper losses. Cecause there is e3cess potential, i.e., the voltage level across the output terminals of the signal source which supplies the MRA is higher when connected to the MRA than it is with nothing connected to it, the MRA is not behaving li!e a dead short or even li!e an impedance, but more li!e a voltage supply...which, as you will see, is what it is. he magnet is merely a saturable ferrite core, e3cept that it is also a magnet in resonance, and its harmonics are being reflected, or fed bac! into the primary by the pie'o. (ere is where we have to figure this out ourselves, because there is no 1prior art1 that this has ever been done before. he result is the creation of a potential which is applied to the pie'o in opposition to the supply potential, and which literally pushes bac! supply current which increases supply voltage. *n the process of doing this, this created potential is converting flu3 into electrons to !eep this 1new1 current circulating in the series resonant circuit, so that the output power from the MRA is higher than the power consumed in the primary. his is non-linear operation, which will be described further into this message. he saturation point of the magnet as a ferrite core determines the gain of the MRA. <or a given load, the MRA will saturate as seen by increases in supply potential above the saturation point which result in decreases in the MRA output. he three octave range of the MRA is related to the /;: !(' resonant fre&uency of magnet*GM, not of mag%# G. *n other words, the resonant fre&uency of flu3 particles,

which are universally constant regardless of the type of magnet, its si'e, etc., is /;7.J8: !('. (aving determined that the magnets which we use will resonate most audibly at 2-J !(', we double that for an octave separation of /9-/2 !(', and again for -8--9 !(', and apply appro3imately -7 !(' to the pie'o. After the MRA 1warms up1 for about an hour, building up its harmonics, it rings at its 2-J !(' magnet resonant fre&uency. Gome e3perimenters !eep aspirin on hand because the pure ringing sound over time will really give you a wallbanger of a headache. %ow, here6s how that relates 1upward1 to the /;: !('. 0nce again, we are in new territory here, so please feel free to disagree, offer new ideas, etc. he -7 !(' mass aggregate fre&uency will double if the MRA is allowed to run open, and that will double if two MRAs are tied together and allowed to run open. #ach doubling = one octave, so at the third octave, the fre&uency is /-9 !('. When you subtract this from /;: !(', you have -J !('. *f you subtract /-9 !(' from /;. !(', you have -7 !(', which is the MRA mass aggregate fre&uency. #ither the fre&uency of flu3 is /;. !(' instead of /;: !(', or the : !(' difference is due to component variations, which seems more li!ely. Cased upon the results which we have seen, * believe that we are using multiples of flu3 resonance in the MRA, in which case the earth, or more directly the sun, is providing energy which is sympathetically resonating and adding energy to the circuit. (owever, the wea! flu3 potentials would not provide unity, much less several times unity. <or this, we have to go bac! to Ma3well6s Yuaternions, as well as to Whitta!er /J.-, the GtoneyDWhitta!erDHiol!ows!i description of the decomposition of , A (coulomb transverse potential) into bi-directional #M wave pairs, and analy'e the nonlinear operation of the MRA using !nown, already accepted %>0 (non linear optical) functioning. According to %>0, the pie'o and primary of the MRA are connected by their , As, which causes slightly amplified A,R (phase con)ugate replica) waves between them, which s!ews the energy density of the , As. his (most importantly) alters the ordinary isotropic distribution of potential with respect to radial direction. #ach component becomes a pump for the A,R waves until the saturation point of the circuit is reached. hat6s standard te3tboo! %>0, applied to define the &uantum step potential increases which occur as a result of the principles of interferometry, as described by Whitta!er, /J.7. he MRA applies principles which were !now J. years ago, to create effects that are defined by currently accepted %>0 theory. Cecause these effects include over-unity, more than a few people are less than courteous in their assessment of the circuit and its inventors. (owever, 504R generation can use this information to ma!e real changes in this tired old world. han! you for your e3cellent &uestions. Food luc! with your studiesI Message /.9J; (./D/9DJ: /2B/;) <romB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB (R) mmmmm....could beI

(i "oel L * am told there is a prior art MRA patent by a fellow named Richardson...* will pursue the patent number and get it andDor the actual details of the patent online... it is supposed to be almost e3actly the same circuit... L "erry Message /.;-/ (./D/2DJ: .JB/J) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Ferald 06+ocharty Gub)ectB MRA est (i Ferald L *f you insert a resistor or other device in series with primary, it will interfere with the biwave translation which is occurring, and effectively shut down the p-channel. After you have tuned the MRA for ma3 output, let it coo! there for about an hour to build up harmonics. hen, reduce the fre&uency, and as you do, you will see the input voltage to the MRA increase above the no- load voltage of the signal supply. 5ou can 1stop1 anywhere in this region, and after you do, the output from the MRA as well as the input voltage will begin to step up incrementally as the harmonics once again begin to build up. *f you can measure A, current into your signal supply, you will see it decrease below the standby level. his assumes that you have an amplifier which will provide about 8: @A, to the MRA, because it sin!s voltage (the pie'o does) below a threshhold of about that level. he best way to determine primary current is to detune as above but stop before your amplifier voltage goes above no-load. While you still have a voltage drop across the MRA, remove it from the circuit and replace it with a decade bo3, and find the resistance value which will give you the same voltage drop. his is the effective impedance of the MRA, and can be used to determine source current. hen when you compare the power as determined by *# N ..;.; with the output power, either A, or +, from a bridge, you will see your power gain. *f you add a resistor to the primary, and measure current inline with it, you will find that current is greater than if you measure inline current without the resistor... which violates ohm6s law... and which demonstrates the activity of the p-channel. (ope this info helps. #n)oyI L "oel Message /.;-: (./D/2DJ: .JB:/) <romB %orman Wootan oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB MRA Cill L he dead pie'o6s ma!e a very loud 1screec!1 sound around 8$(' when they go 1sour1 and will not drive the MRA circuit. * have wound some turns ratios that produced the same effect from a very good pie'o though so it could be a condition of the pie'o not li!ing the reflected e3cess potential being shoved bac! at it. %ormally, when the pie'o goes bad it is 1clinically dead1 which is the reason for needing more info on the possible 1poling1 loss. * can6t believe that someone out on the *-%et has some valued input on this sub)ect but has not come forward to help us out in this 1vague1 area. he biggest problem is that these pie'o6s were designed for very special applications at precise specs and it is not something you go down to 1Wal-Mart1 and purchase. * had a call last night from a guy who wanted to build a MRA and was fussing about a price of

E/.. for a new pie'o of the type we are using (&uote from the manufacturer) minimum purchase E8.. for RQ+ sample. han!s for the 1scan1 )ob, will get bac! to you later. L %orm Message /.;-; (./D/2DJ: //B:;) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB erry Castian Gub)ectB <lu3 <re&uency (i erry L he fre&uency of /;7.J8: !(' was found while testing the %ieper Ring. Cecause * believe that gravity is a &uadrupole effect in which the spin of particles is reacting to #M fields, * felt that signal in)ecting the %ieper Ring would create field stability as seen in the scope display of the Ring6s harmonics at the resonant fre&uency of flu3. he center fre& of the Ring is about /.- M(', and is a comple3 waveform with a real 6soup6 of harmonics. At /;7.2 !(', the %ieper Ring waveform became synchronous. %orm tested this using a magnetDcoil combination and found that it loc!ed on at /;7.J8: !('. %orm6s test e&uipment has a higher degree of accuracy, so * believe that his measurement is closer. *f you want to try this yourself, and to verify the ability of the %ieper Ring to 6lose weight6, build a %ieper Ring. *t6s only three audio power transistors and some passives, so it6s cheap and easy to put together in one afternoon. he reason that you get /.- M(' from audio 3istors is because they are biased on with no signal input, and they brea! into self resonance as a result of their tetrahedral lattice structures. he A(* of the lattices determines the center fre&uency and harmonic relationships. Gilicon and germanium both have tet lattices. * thin! that %orm6s method is closer to the one used by esla, but * don6t have the details on it. #n)oyI L "oel Message /.;7J (./D/2DJ: /2B89) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Ferald 06+ocharty Gub)ectB Resistor is 0$... (i Ferald L 5es, you can use )ust a resistor as a load...* forgot to answer that in the previous messages. Regardless of whether you measure output power as A, across a resistor, or as rectified +, across a motor, light, resistor, etc., you first need to be in the operating range of the MRA. he first MRA that was built could provide gain with only a (A-8..cd signal generator to drive it, which we have not been able to match since, e3cept with the most recent MRA in tests with the little grain-of-wheat lamps...and that falls off after about an hour, as the harmonics die out. As you can see from the data, it ta!es a couple of watts in to prime the pump (waves), after which you can bac! off on the fre&uency and achieve nonlinear gain on the output. We use a Radio Ghac! amp to drive the MRA...)ust about any good audio amp with 8: @A, output will do.

We use +, output because we believe in demonstrating the output power in useful applications, such as driving motors and lights. *f you )ust want to measure the power *D0 ratio, rectification is not necessary. 0ur measurements 1eat1 the loss caused by the rectifying and filtering, because we want to show gain in usable power, and +, is far more usable that -7 !('. "ust give a holler if we can be of any help. L "oel Message /.;9/ (./D/2DJ: 8/B7J) <romB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) oB #d Wall Gub)ectB (R) +load and MRA (i #dI As to barium ferrite magnets, Radio Ghac! still supplies them and they can be tested with an ohmmeter... if it reads [8.Mohm, it is %0 barium, if \8.Mohm, it probably is... as to the Aie'o6s, most of us got ours from anners in ,arrollton, a suburb of +allas, anner #lectronics... * don6t !now if they have any left but they run about Eeach... they are also sold in the bac! of most electronic mags... good luc!... L "erry Message /.;9: (./D/JDJ: ./B:;) <romB Cill Ceaty oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB pie'os %orm Q "oel L * wonder if the MRA effect re&uires that the pie'o be imperfect, so multiple resonances can start out in the first place. *f so, then it might be re&uired that they have a dead spot from the heat and solder in order to wor! right. Gort of similar to the heart re&uiring a dead muscle area to start multiple waves of fibrillation, rather than one single strong beat. (ave you seen overunity in unsoldered pie'os that have terminals taped to the platingK * have a few unsoldered thin ones *6ll try. (ere6s a partial table of AH materials sold by Aie'o $inetics *nc., A0 Co3 ;:9, Cellefonte AA /928- 2/7--::-/:J-. heir brochure shows custom shapes, so they may not have standard stoc! si'es. . Material W ,urie temp (c) Ma3 <ield (@Dmm) $ A$*7.. (+river) -/. -:. /87. A$*:.. (Gensor) -:. -.. /;.. A$*::. ((i-$ Gensor) 8.. 8.. -8.. - More - M,Tontinue, MGTtop, M%TonGtopK n A$*2.. (>o-loss +river) -8. 7.. /... . hey mention that 6poling6 is done above ,urie temp with high voltage. his sounds suspiciously li!e the 6electrici'ing6 process with electret materials (as opposed to magneti'ing of magnets). *f you want to e3periment, you might try simply placing the pie'o on a metal plate on an electric stove, and applying a couple of $@ between the plate and the top terminal. *f you have bro!en ones to sacrifice, you might try heating them up to see at what temp the plating o3idi'es. *f you run them with an audible signal while slowly raising the heat control, you might be able to get a reproducable heat setting for the ,urie temp of your units (when the audible sound goes away) which is below the temp where the coating is damaged.

Message /.;;8 (./D/JDJ: /.B./) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) Gub)ectB Carium (i "erry L Ceen doing a little studying regarding barium. *t is never found in pure form due to its reactivity. *t6s usually processed out of barytine, and has to be stored under !erosene to !eep it pure after processing. *t also has a cube (body centered) lattice structure which consists of ten tetrahedrons. he reactivity of the barium atom causes the ether in the area of the nucleus to become semiconductive, so in a poled device, li!e a pie'o or a magnet, there is always a certain amount of potential 1slippage1 occurring. Carium alloys seem to be ideal for Gweet and MRA types of devices. When you combine that with titanium, which is also optically active, you can get a lot of energetic reaction. <or this reason, there is always some time distortion or p-channel activity around these pie'os and magnets, if they are poled, and regardless of whether they are energi'ed by e3ternal potentials or not. 4sing resonance )ust widens the e3isting channel and s!ews the potentials in such a way that more subharmonics can react with the ether to translate more of the biwaves, which are there anyway, into #M. A barium ferrite magnet will cause a cloc! or watch to run slow, not due to magnetic fields, but because the magnet is in a constant state of self oscillation with the ether...so will a barium pie'o, to a lesser e3tent. *f you use these features to create an open system in a closed loop, you can !eep the potentials moving faster than the load device can use the energy, and that is unity plus. * thin! maybe Gweet !new this and !new how to use it. he @ A, however, is an open system in an open loop, in that it uses the ether itself to reflect as well as to provide subharmonics, with the effect that you can6t 1load it down1. *t )ust !eeps bouncing bac! with more, because the energy is only limited to whatever is available in the entire universe. We are using the pie'o as the reflective element, which contains the potentials within the series resonant closed loop, and does not allow the MRA to 1run open1 if you load it heavily...it )ust drops below unity. Actually, the ferrite, not the barium, determines the gain by reaching the point at which it becomes a saturated core, and can6t add any more power for additional increases in e3cess potential. Carium is curious stuff. here are probably other elements which will wor! as well or better, depending on their reactivity and optical characteristics. Will !eep researching this and report bac!. L "oel Message /.;;- (./D/JDJ: //B..) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB Aie'o Aoling

(i Cill L * (*%$ that the pie'os have to be good, poled parts in order to wor! properly in the MRA. he +#FR## of poling may alter the gain, because the gain of a MRA will vary from one pie'o to another, when using the same magnet and output load. A &uic! test has been with the <lu!e 2; to measure capacitance, and the 1good1 pie'os measure about : nf, but if you reverse the leads, measure - nf. he 1bad1 pie'os have less capacitance and no difference when the meter leads are reversed. Also, even the 1good1 pie'os need to be 1conditioned1 at low signal input for a day or two before they will hold up under an amplifier and a load of any wattage. ,onditioning seems to improve the poling by increasing the dielectric strength of the pie'os. * really need some mfr6s spec6s on these parts to be any more specific about their characteristics. *t seems reasonable that poling will result in a standing potential, and this is necessary before the inner, or 1p1 channel subharmonics can translate into #M. Game effect with the magnet...the process of creating the magnet places the barium into a poled environment, and the inner channel activity will occur whether there is e3ternally applied potential or not. (ope this is helpful. L "oel Message /.;J. (./D8.DJ: /7B78) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB "erry +ec!er (Gysop) Gub)ectB he Mc$ie A0+mod...brilliantI (i "erry L "ust finished reading the Mc$ie patent, or A0+mod as it is called. As you !now, there are two parallel resonant circuits running at 8. !(', alternately powering a series resonant circuit running at 7. !('. Cecause each tan! discharges twice as fast as it charges, the power is amplified because the output current is doubled for half the charge time, with two tan! circuits, so the output is constant. he tan! circuits offer ma3imum impedance to source current while the series resonant circuit offers minimum impedance to the load. 0f course, there6s more...there is an >R circuit and an >, circuit in the load, so the >R causes voltage to lead current by J. degrees, which charges the inductor while minimi'ing current C#<0R# the >, circuit 1sees1 the potential and charges the >, circuit. Remember 1#li the ice manK1K Mc$ie is driving his load almost e3clusively on potential 0%>5. * read the comparison with the 1 esla Gwitch1 in the $eely%et file, and by golly, this is what it is happening. While the >R is discharging into the >,, the ne3t 1wave1 of potential is getting ready to switch to the >R. As soon as the >, 4G#G the power, the >R replenishes it. @irtually current free potential, made even better with the use of tunnel, or negative resistance, diodes. A0+mod is a brilliant application of theory. he patent number, as you mentioned, is W :,/79,-J: dated Gept. 2, /JJ8. We G(04>+ be buying these at WalMart by now...do you !now if they are in productionK Message /.2.8 (./D8/DJ: /-B.J) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB Woody Moffitt Gub)ectB still going...

(i Woody L he drop off in over-unity can occur at either of the 1ends1 of the operating range, and seems to define the boundaries of operation. Cy either increasing load on the secondary beyond the saturation point of the permeable core, or by decreasing fre&uency until the subharmonics ring out, you can force the MRA below unity. here is an optimum range of output load and input fre&uency, wherein the nonlinear increase in input impedance creates an effective reduction of primary current, hence input power, for a disproportionately higher amount of output power. he dimensions of this range appear constant in relative terms for differing MRA configurations, although the actual parameters of center resonant fre&uency and output power will vary with the components. Within the optimum range, the MRA hasn6t 1rang out1 through e3tended testing to date. %ow, the effects of impedances in a circuit do not relate directly to pure resistance, but the average value of each has the same effect on circuit current. his is especially true of a series resonant circuit because the reactances cancel, leaving only resistance. While this is true within the resonant range of the circuit, the individual effects of Nl and Nc become more pronounced as you move either above or below the center resonant fre&uency. We wish we had the type of e&uipment which would allow millisecond-bymillisecond analysis of the MRA with simultaneously monitored voltages and currents, so that we could then plot the coordinates as vectors... lac!ing that, we turned the MRA over to those who have !nowledge superior to ours, and the tools to test the MRA properly. 0bviously, we have a great respect for these people and we an3iously await their reviews and analyses. *f there are hidden variables which 1average value1 testing cannot see, they will be found, and the effects will be clearly defined in terms of power. 5ou !now as well as anyone that there are always hidden variables in anything, so it remains to be seen how much they will affect the power gains which we measure as average values. We can use (and accept) hevenin6s heorem, but we also !now Murphy, so reality is somewhere in between. han!s, dudeI L "oel Message /.2/2 (./D88DJ: /:B.8) <romB +avid Wyland oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB MRA #3periments GourcesB +igi-$ey (/-2..--77-7:-J) is a great electronics and semiconductor mail order catalog company. "ust call the 2.. number and they will send you a catalog every month or two. hey ta!e credit cards, and they ship in 87 hours. * have used them &uite often, and they are good. 5ou already !now about these guys, but * thought * would give them a plug anyway. %ewar! #lectronics (/-2..-8J2--/-- e3t. 72) is another good mail order catalog company. heir catalog is much bigger, more industrial and has a wide variety of parts, particularly transistors. heir catalog comes out yearly and is about 8 thic!.

#dmund Gcientific (/-9.J-:;--98:.) in Carrington, %", carries magnets and other scientific e&uipment for the e3perimenter and industrial mar!et. hey are well !nown and have been around for a while. #lectronic #ngineers Master (##M) is a four volume set of reference boo!s supplied yearly for free to engineers. he ##M publishers number in %5 is (:/9-88;-/-..). hey list the manufacturers of )ust about anything that has wires hanging out of it, including crystals and magnets. *f you want more info on these, let me !now. ##M shows Morgan Matroc as an ultrasonic crystal transducer manufacturer, pg C/J;/ of the /JJ: edition, volume C. he pictures and te3t say they ma!e these type of crystals. 5ou might want to chec! them out. heir address isB Morgan Matroc, *nc., 8-8 <orbes Road, Cedford, 0( 77/79? 8/9-8-8-29..? 8/9-8-82;-/ (fa3) McMaster-,arr Gupply ,ompany (-/.-9J8-:J//) is a big industrial supply catalog. hey sell everything for the factory including magnets. hey have a 8;..P page catalog with : pages of Alnico, ceramic and other magnets for industrial use. Alnico rectangular bar magnets go to /3/39, for e3ample. hese people do &uite big, industrial business. he problem will be to get their attention for a small order. (igh Aower +evicesB 5ou need some high power transistorsK hey are available. he *nternational Rectifier *FC (*nsulated Fate Cipolar ransistor) devices should do for most anything. he *RFA<7. is rated at /8.. volts at 8J amps for EJ... in &uantity of one from +igi-$ey. hat6s about -: $W switching in one device. Modules with these voltage ratings at currents into the hundreds of amps are also available. his is over!ill as an e3ample. A wide variety of bipolar and M0G<# devices, both %A% (%-channel) and A%A (Achannel) are available for a few dollars at voltages up to 7:. volts and several amperes. Gelf Aowered MRAB he final proof of the MRA pudding will be self sustaining operation without e3ternal power input. *f you can get a clean +, Watt out of an MRA from nowhere, you will have something tough to deny. (* !now, * have a firm grasp of the obvious.) Cy pumping out an e3cess watt = / "ouleDsecond, you will &uic!ly eliminate other e3planations of where the power comes from, such as using up the energy of magneti'ation of the magnet, for e3ample. #ach day of operation would yield about J.,... )oules. 5ou can compare this against the energy of magneti'ation of the core, or even against nitroglycerin in terms of )oulesD!ilogram. (ere are two direct ways for self powering the MRA that * can thin! ofB /) Ma!e a +, powered sine wave oscillator and amplifier combination to drive the MRA, with the +, power for the oscillatorDamplifier combination coming (eventually) from the MRA output. <irst, you power up the MRA using a battery or other e3ternal supply. When the MRA is up and running, you switch over to MRA power. L +avid ,. Wyland Message /.28. (./D88DJ: /:B:8) <romB "im 4ban

oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB MRA design ideas wDrDt @ A (i %orm L * have been avidly following the MRA updates since being alerted to it6s e3istence by Mr. +on $elly. ,ongratulations on your and "oel Mc,lain6s successI 0ver the past 8 years *6ve also been studying Mr. Gweet6s @ A system (also with the information help of +on $). he MRA is reminiscent of the @ A and * would guess probably draws from the same energy source, but using a different engineering reali'ation which is much more reproducible. (owever, Gweet was able to get out much higher over-unity gains. Aerhaps * can offer some design insights from my @ A studiesK wo main issues are apparent now. <irst is the output windings. Gweet was able to get his outputs using what6s called 6bifilar6 winding for the output coil(s). At the *%# conference last May, Gweet6s setup was replicated and verified by Mr. +on Watson. * spo!e with +on at length, and obtained his design specs (which he has freely given for public domain usage). (e also used bifilar windings on the output. Cifilar windings are basically two identical and independent windings cross-connected at the output. 0ne can ma!e elaborate windings where first one layer is wound with one wire, then another layer wound (even in the opposite turn direction) with the second wire. Cut +on W too! a simpler approach of winding from 8 solid-wire spools at the same time. his way, the same amount of identical wire is put on the coil in two independent (and insulated) strands. he outputs are cross-connected. <rom normal #-M theory, it should not be possible to get any effect in this sort of winding, since any !ind of magnetic induction effect would set up a current in each of the two output windings, which would cancel each other due to the cross-connection at the terminus of the wires. (owever, this is what Gweet and +on W used. +on says his circuit wor!ed well, similar to Gweet6s setup. *t occurred to me this could well be why you were able to get the MRA only to wor! with stranded wire. he stranded wire would be acting li!e a bifilar winding. *n that case, the fact that the wires are continually shorted must not ma!e a difference, which goes along with the hypothesis that a different energy than surface-wire electron motion is what we are dealing with here. (owever, it may be that a directly bifilar wound output coil would wor! better than the stranded wire. Go * mention it here for your consideration. he second issue is the magnet itself. he big stopping point for replicating Gweet6s setup has been that it re&uires 6conditioned6 magnets. he specs for this had not been forthcoming from Gweet in clear form. ((e apparently has given out grains of truth along with a lot of nonsense, perhaps due to legal restrictions or his own inclinations). Anyway, +on Watson has done a lot of wor! with magnets, and was able to put together an approach that seems to replicate the needed conditioning. 5our /D/9DJ: note about 1looseness of the domains in the magnet1 plays directly to this conditioning process. What +on W basically does is mostly demagneti'e the magnets using powerful capacitor-pulsed coils around the periphery of the flat slab magnets. (e alternates the magnet from top up to top down (tal!ing about the large flat side here), and also varies the tilt of the magnet up to about -. degrees on the two ma)or a3es, giving a pulse or two at each orientation. he goal (as measured with 6magnet paper6 which shows the domain boundaries) is to end up with a wea!ly magneti'ed magnet that has about /D8 to -D7 inches of one polarity (% or G pole perpendicular to the large flat surface) around the outer edge of the flat surface of the magnet, and then the inner section being the other

polarity (913713/D81 magnets). *n this way, a 6magnetic bubble6 is formed, which is &uite visible in the magnetic paper. he second step is to place this magnet between two copper hand-built capacitor plates and charge it to a few $@ for a while (* have more specific specs on all this). +on found that doing this step loosened up the magnetic bubble such that a small magnet could easily move it around, as evidenced by the magnetic paper. Go, the drive coil (wound normally) could easily wiggle the magnetic bubble (and therefore a lot of magnetic grains in the magnet) to a large degree with a minimal input. +on Watson6s wor! was only with Carium <errite magnets which he found at surplus houses. (e found that a @0M can show the difference, where touching any two points on the surface of a Ca<e has almost infinite resistance? whereas the now available Gr<e has a few megohms resistance. 0ne theory is that the low resistance wipes out eddy currents which dampen the effect. Also, Ca<e has better magneti'ation curves than Gr<e for the demagneti'ing, bubble-forming process. Gweet (and +on W) runs the system completely at 9.(H. ( he final conditioning step is to pulse the demagneti'ing coils at a 9.(H pea! a few times). (e probably needs the very loosened-up magnetic domains to get the system to wor! at that fre&uency. 5ou and "oel have hit on the idea of resonating the magnet at it6s natural fre&uency, which perhaps gets the domains sha!ing nicely without being so loosened up. (owever, applying some of these conditioning techni&ues might loosen up the magnet domains further for greater-output operation at your fre&uencies also. *6ve )ust received some of the >ead-Hirconate pie'os from (QR, and hope to proceed with e3perimentation here as well. >et me !now if you want more specifics on the WatsonDGweet conditioning process. Message /.2-/ (./D8-DJ: .-B:-) <romB Cill Ceaty oB All Gub)ectB MRA fm internet 8 ReB Actual test data *nput signal with no-load (MRA not connected) = 8;./- @A, MRA output load = same Aittman motor R//9 ma *nput signal with MRA connected and powering motor = 89.22 @A, *nput signal amplitude reduction as per above = ..8: @A, Measured e&uivalent resistance to achieve ..8: @A, drop = /9.. ohms "oel L he .8: volt difference mentioned above is only / O of the voltages that you are measuring the difference between. ,onsidering that this is in all li!elihood about the precision of the meter you are using, it could be out by as much as /..O. herefore these calculations are meaningless. <urthermore, you do not give any information about waveform, or phase. Although * appreciate that phase between input current and voltage are difficult to determine, if you can6t measure input currentI Aersonally for the sa!e of e3periment, * would ris! including a small resistor in the input circuit, even if it means reducing the gain somewhat, )ust to be sure of what is going on. hen once you are sure (i.e. you have measured wave-form, phase, etc., with over unity operation), you can

remove the resistor again, for the rest of your e3periments. As it stands, your input circuit must already have some ohmic resistance, therefore it is not a priori fatal to the operation of the circuit. A good scope should be able to measure milivolt voltage drops across a small resistor (And with much better accuracy than subtracting two almost e&ual high voltages). 0n another pointB * was wondering if you could tune the fre&uencies of your pie'os, but putting them under pressure. e.g. clamped between rubber bloc!s in a small vice. Alternatively, you might include a small ad)ustable capacitor in series in the circuit, to tune the tan! fre&uency, as is done in digital watches. * suspect that best results will be obtained, only at very precise fre&uencies. (Aerhaps improving asymptotically as (# fre&uency is approached). Another thought, if the pie'o fre&uency is a multiple of the magnet fre&uency, then you might try mechanically coupling the two, to ensure that they resonate on e3act harmonics (* suspect that this will further improve the Y factor of the primary circuit). *t occurs to me that if this is not the case, then the input impedance will not rise as high, and the gain won6t be as high as it might. %e3t pointB * got the impression that $eely was tal!ing about the third harmonic, however you seem to be operating on the second, i.e., 7 times the fre&uency, rather than 2 times. What happens if you use a magnet fre&uency of about 7 !(', 0R a pie'o fre&uency of 97 $('K L Robin van Gpaandon! [rvanspaaRo'email.com.au Message /.2-: (/D8-DJ: .;B8/) <romB Cob Aaddoc! oB "oel Mc,lain Gub)ectB (R) MRA est *f you insert a resistor or other device in series with primary, it will interfere with the biwave translation which is occurring, and effectively shut down the p-channel. 0ne of the designs *6ve been toying with uses G#%<# G (M0G<# G that have $alvonic ,urrent Mirror outputs) which should not 6interfere6 li!e a series resistor. Message /.2:2 (/D8-DJ: /8B:9) <romB "oel Mc,lain o B Cill Ceaty Gub)ectB Reply for Aeter Riet' *n answer to your &uestionsB /. We believe that barium is a singularity. *t is highly reactive, it has a cube lattice structure, and it has a weight of /-;. As such, it most easily engages the ,oulomb ransverse Aotential with the aether, resonates more easily, and can translate more biwave pairs into #M energy. 8. We haven6t found any correlation with the physical location of the pie'o relative to the magnet, in terms of performance. -. he shape of the magnet might matter. We don6t !now because we have been wor!ing with the same generally oblong rectangular shape all along. 7. he dominant fre&uency is the fre&uency applied. here are other fre&uencies apparent, similar to the 1noise1 that you see in a transistor circuit. his 1noise1 is

1riding1 on the dominant fre&uency, and becomes more apparent as the MRA 1warms up1. *n operation, the MRA is energi'ed at pea! resonance for an hour, and then detuned by appro3imately /7.-/9. (', which causes the effective impedance of the primary to increase by ten or more times, while only slightly reducing the output power. We use an audio amplifier to provide the input, with a signal generator feeding the amplifier. he amplifier has an impedance matching transformer for its output, and we use the highest impedance tap of the transformer secondary. A sine wave input is necessary, as is stranded wire. We wind the secondary first, and the primary over it. We are using step down ratios of 8B/ from primary to secondary. All of the above is not to say that there are not better ways of doing it...these are only how we are doing it, and other methods may yield better results. A friend is in the process of building a low power sine wave generator which we plan to use for a self-sustaining mode of operation. We believe that the generator should be able to provide 8.--. @A, at /:. ma ma3imum (for the warmup), and be tunable within -.7. !('. We will use rechargable batteries to start and maintain the circuit. Food luc! to you in your studies. L "oel Message /.22. (/D87DJ: /.B7.) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB All Gub)ectB MRA #valuation by *AG >ate yesterday, * received a fa3 from (al Authoff and Gcott >ittle at the *nstitute for Advanced Gtudies at Austin. (al confirmed the measurements which we had documented for both load and no-load operation of the MRA. (owever, different conclusions were reached with regard to interpretation of the measurements which do not support over-unity gain. While we are still in dialogue with (al and Gcott with regard to the interpretation of the measurements, * felt it best to share this information with all interested $eely%etters, along with a sincere 1than! you1 to (al and Gcott for their !ind and generous assistance in the test of the MRA. As is often the case, especially with HA# devices, correct data can lead to incorrect conclusions... this may be the case with the MRA as well, in terms of %orm6s and my testing. >oo!ing bac!, *6m very glad that we shared our data with everyone, as this may help others as a 1case in point1. Alternately, however, we have re&uested that (al and Gcott try testing the MRA without adding series resistors in the primary circuit. We thin! that the addition of resistors might have the effect of bloc!ing subharmonics, which would cause an increase in primary source current. When components are added, it is no longer the same circuit, i.e., it is no longer the MRA, in our opinion. We will be continuing our wor! with the MRA, as the most difficult measurement for us to verify is that of primary current. We hope to perform the HA# 1litmus test1 with an oscillator to test the ability of the MRA to self-sustain. As with all tests, we will

share the test results. My personal than!s to all of you as well, especially "erry and Cill, for helping to share this and all previous information. L "oel Message /.22: (/D87DJ: /;B.;) <rom B +avid Wyland oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB 8nd half of MRA message Gorry * got cut off half way through the last message. (ere is the rest of it, with some thoughts and data. (ere are two direct ways for self powering the MRA that * can thin! ofB /) Ma!e a +, powered sine wave oscillator and amplifier combination to drive the MRA, with the +, power for the oscillatorDamplifier combination coming (eventually) from the MRA output. <irst, you power up the MRA using a battery or other e3ternal supply. When the MRA is up and running, you switch over to MRA power. %oteB the sine wave oscillatorDamplifier output voltage must be set by some reference voltage independent of the MRA +, voltage output to prevent unwanted positive feedbac!. 8) Ma!e a +, powered A, amplifier to drive the MRA, with the +, power for the amplifier coming from the MRA, as above. (ave the amplifier input driven by the signal generator through an opto-isolator (or even a fiber optic cable, if you want to spend a few dollars more.) he opto-isolator prevents any power flow from the oscillator to the amplifier. *t consists of a >#+ and a photodiode. ,urrent in the >#+ causes current in the photodiode. hese devices cost about E/... and are available in wide variety. his method allows you to use the signal generator for control but totally eliminate it as a source of power. #ventually, you would replace it with a low power sine wave oscillator on the MRA board. he amplifier will probably need both P and - +, voltages if you want the sine wave to be symmetrical about ground. (%o +, component.) *n addition to using a full wave bridge at the MRA output for output power, use two half wave rectifiers and capacitors to generate P and - +, voltages. <or the MRA]s discussed, this means about P/8 Q -/8 out to the amplifier. A low output impedance amplifier capable of putting out -. @RMG (LJ. @ pea! to pea!) is not to tough to ma!e. 5ou need transistors rated at probably /:.P volts to be safe. he *A-/, %A% and the *A-., A%A may be good choices. #ach are rated at /7. volts @cbo at - Amps with an f of 7 M('. *f the amplifier voltage output to the MRA is to be 8 to : @RMG (L/: @ pea! to pea! =\ PD- ;.: volts pea! from the MRA power supply) when running, the MRA should be able to power it with no problem. *nstrumentation houghtsB o measure high voltages, use a /...B/ probe, such as a /. Meg and /.$ resistor pair. 0ne end of the /. meg goes to the measurement point, the other to the /.$? the other end of the /$ goes to ground. (ave the scope measure across the /$ resistor. his protects the scope, !eeps the load on the test point small (../ mA at / $@) and allows the /$@P voltage to be in range on the ^scope. 5ou might want to use a high voltage /. meg or a string of 8 or more resistors so they don]t arc over.

Another approach is to use a /. p< and a /.,... p< (../ u<) capacitor pair, since you are loo!ing at A,. his would eliminate any +, load. 4se a high voltage /. p< cap. Watch out for the current probesB they add some inductance because they act li!e a ferrite bead around the wire they measure. hey measure current by transformer effect. What you are clipping around the wire is a split ferrite core. *f you are not sure about whether the scope is chopping your signal, cut it bac! to one channel, unchopped. Cy the way, chop rates of /.. to :.. $(' are common, and so are chopped scope artifacts if your signal happens to be near some phase loc!ed harmonic of the chop rate. * hope * have pi&ued your interest and that we can wor! together. *t loo!s li!e funI L +avid ,. Wyland L Message /.J.- (/D8:DJ: /-B-8) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB More testing, *gorII (i %orm L * had a most illuminating conversation with (al today. *6ve as!ed him to !eep the MRA for as long as he feels that it has anything to offer him as a device for testing. At this point, he may be about done with it, as it appears not to be above unity. he !ey to this is not in the reduction of current, which occurs as we have seen, but in the cosine of the phase angle, which changes as the circuit is detuned. hus it is possible to have a vastly reduced current in combination with a measurable increase in terminal voltage and still have a relative increase in input power. Reactance, which alters the phase angle, becomes more prominent as the MRA is detuned. %ow, * (*%$ that this is minimal as long as we are within the bandwidth of the 4niversal Resonance ,hart, but * could be wrong. *f this is what is happening, and (al6s test provides data which indicates that this is the case, then the phase angle changes should be directly measurable. *6m not completely convinced, and won6t be until we have &uantified this. he other indications which we have seen, such as the reduction in output current from the driver 3istor of the amp, and the net reduction in A, current to the amp, and the tests with the grain-of-wheat lamps, and other tests, lead me to believe that there is something more going on here. * mentioned that we are going ahead with the plan to build an oscillator to test the MRA in self-sustaining mode, and that the oscillator must be inductively coupled to the MRA. *6ve as!ed (al to test the MRA using inductive coupling via an isolation 3fmr and to omit the series resistor. his would eliminate the local value of impedance, i.e., the resistor, which is replacing the distributed resistances in the tuned circuit. he inductive coupling will provide the same #Q* lead-lag relationships which we have in our own tests. * hope that everyone is aware that * have the utmost respect for and confidence in (al and his staff. Gometimes typed messages are sub)ect to wrong interpretation, and * really +0 %0 want that to be the case here. * genuinely respect them and the efforts which they have given in the test of the MRA. * understand the conclusions which they have

reached, and am gratified that they have verified the accuracy of our measurements. (opefully, this will put to rest all of the doubts concerning the accuracy of our measurements, fre&uency range of test e&uipment, etc. We differ only in the interpretation of those measurements as related to input power. * would hope that any inventor of a device of this type would have the advantage of a review by (al Authoff. Regardless of the outcome of the review, it is an honor. As * told (al, to paraphrase 5ogi Cerra, 1we agree differently1... and that is all. he burden of proof is, as it should be, on the inventors. Go we6ll prove it? it wor!s or it doesn6t...and we6ll &uantify it either way, and share the results. ,6ya. L "oel Message /.J-9 (./D89DJ: .JB.2) <romB %orman Wootan oB %orman ,omparini Gub)ectB MRA #G / Response %ormB *n regard to your &uestion as to our response to the MRA #G / Report * will go on record with the following comments. <irst there is a strange 1parado31 here that thus far has eluded even the best instrumentation in attempts to e3plain this circuit. >et say before going any further that * as does "oel personally appreciate the efforts of (al and Gcott in their analysis of the MRA device and loo! forward to wor!ing with them in the future in further testing when we can nail down what is really going on in the circuit. his pro)ect is not going to )ust die out. * personally have - ea. 1Guper MRA devices1 on my bench which do some rather interesting things which defy all e3planation by conventional 1#M1 theory. * will stand by my statement that there is a phenomenon here that has eluded all attempts to e3plain the circuit even with the most sophisticated 1digital e&uipment1. ,ase in pointB MRA that * call 1big coil /1? *nput is 2..8@A, R ;J2(H across a 1grain of wheat1 bulb (glows very dim) with an output of :8.;@+, into a load of 8 ea. (parallel) 72@ panel lamps drawing -.78 Watts at a current of 9/.:MA. Will some 1electronics engineer1 out there tell me how a tiny grain of wheat bulb with 2..8@A, applied across it in series with the MRA circuit pass enough current to drive the observed load of -.78 WattsK Any and all e3planations will be accepted and considered. Wouldn6t you agree that something real strange is going on hereK o show you that this 1+0F1 is not going to lay down and die is evidenced by my latest MRA that * constructed last night which does the followingB *nput, :-.:@A, R --,9..(H with an output of /8..8@+, into a resistive load of a standard light bulb rated /8.@ /-.: Watts burning very brightly. *nput currentK Well let6s put it this way, * placed a small miniature Radio Ghac! lamp rated at 9@ R ..8:A in series with the MRA input and the tiny little lamp was burning very bright while sustaining the output load. $eep in mind that we are dissipating power in the form of heat and light in the series resistive load in the input side of the circuit therefore the &uestion arises as to what is the effective voltage and current across the pie'o and primary coil of the MRA circuit. +oes conventional 1bridge1 or series resistance calculations apply. *f so then will you figure it out and get bac! to me as to your e3planation. * told you it wouldn6t be easy. L %orm Message /.J-2 (./D89DJ: .JB79) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB ,irculating ,urrents

(i %orm L hose are some very impressive figures on the Magnum. Actually, the input current *G as low as it seems...but the phase angle is altered by the reactance (capacitance) of the primary. Gince the power factor is the cosine of the phase angle, the input power may be greater than it would appear...even with the lower current. hat is the basis of (al6s conclusion, as * understand it. (owever, comma, if the phase shift is occurring and is *G0>A #+ from the source, as with the autotransformer e3ample, then the power increase as a result of phase shift is affecting the power in the MRA only. herein lies the rub. *t AAA#ARG that this is the case because of the net reduction in A, power to the amplifier (below standby), and because of the e3tremely high impedance of the primary as seen by the tiny amount of current in the grain-of-wheats, and none of that even considers the effects of mass aggregate resonance. %ow, when the auto3fmrs would short out, the effect would be the same as if either half of the auto3fmr was connected to a one ohm pure resistanceB .....________...... With 72. @A, applied, the current coil / ohm coil would be 72. amps, and the *V# is 8-.,7... (owever, the line fuses still see a net inductance. hese fuses are rated at 72. @A, and /.. amps, so their *V# is only 72,..., but they will not blow. he windings heat up and burn out. he massive current in the shorted turns is referred to as 1circulating current1, because it circulates in the windings as a result of the phase shift across a pure value of resistance. *f the line were 1seeing1 the power in the shorted windings, the fuses would blow...but the line can6t see it. here e3ists a ratio of five times the power which the line 1sees1 as opposed to the power being dissipated. *s that above unityK Well, to a fuse or a watt-hour meter it is. Cecause the MRA drives the amplifier below standby current for the same line voltage, *6d guess that the effect is related. he isolation is the !ey...with the auto3fmr, the shorted windings are isolated from the line fuses by the net inductance of the coil. With the MRA, the isolation 3fmr of the amplifier is the !ey...as long as resistances remains distributed... * thin!. esting with a self-powering MRA will prove or disprove it, one way or the other. Adding a pure resistive value in the inductive path of the MRA may represent the shorted turn in the auto3fmr...ma3imum circulating current which the source does not see, but which gives the appearance of a lot of power into the MRA from the source. (mmm again. ,ome to thin! of it, the auto3fmr e3ample sounds li!e Russell6s device, doesn6t itK And the shorted winding seems li!e a caduceus turn. Anybody can feel free to )ump in hereI *deasK L "oel Message /.J;/ (./D8;DJ: //B-.) <rom B +avid Wyland o B %orman Wootan Gub)ectB MRA esting %orm L (ere are some thoughts on MRA testing. * thin! a critical test is to measure the input current. 5ou could do this by putting a / ohm resistor in series with the return lead of the MRA and measuiring the voltage across the resistor with a scope. 5ou can ma!e the / ohm resistor out of ten /. ohm resistors in parallel, which you should get

able to get at Radio Ghac!. #ven :O carbon comps should wor! to begin with because you are loo!ing for an order of magnitude. *f you have grounding problems between the scope and the amplifier, you could a) float the scope with an isolation transformer (a very handy thing to have for this function), b) run the amplifier off a /8-volt battery if it is the Radio Ghac! AA system dual voltage amplifier. 5ou could use a lantern battery or run a length of /7 gage Malibu garden light 'ip cord to the cigarette lighter of a car, or c) ma!e a differential isolation amplifier from an op amp, four /.$ ohm resistors and a pair of J volt batteries. Almost any op amp will doB 0A-.;, 0A-8;, ><7//, >M-87, etc. ,onnect the J volt batteries to the P@ and -@ power terminals. ,onnect the output to the amplifier (-) input through a /.! resistor, and connect the amplifier (P) to battery common. ,onnect the remaining two /.$ resistors between the / ohm resistor and the amplifier (P) and (-) inputs. he scope ground goes to battery common and the amplifier output goes to the scope input. he result is a gain-of-/ differential amplifier, which will eliminate ground loops. (ReferenceB %ational >inear Applications (andboo!, etc.) When you chec! the current, also chec! the applied voltage to the MRA and try to estimate the phase angle between them. Aower = @V*Vcos angle. * got the impression that when you got the MRA in its low input power mode, you could reduce the input drive voltage from -. @RMG to --: @RMG and still maintain the output voltage. rue, or am * dreamingK Food >uc!I L +ave Wyland Message /.J;: (./D8;DJ: /-B-2) <romB Gteve hatcher oB All Gub)ectB MRA Aie'os * have been following the MRA development and was searching for sources for pie'o crystals. o those that are loo!ing for a source, you might try contacting Morgan Matroc *nc. hey are in 0hio and have been in the pie'o business for :. years according to their ads. heir phone W is (8/9)8-8-29.. and the address is 8-8 <orbes Road? Cedford, 0hio 77/79. * haven6t built the device and haven6t dug enough into yet to !now what you all are loo!ing for. *t appears that this company may have some high power-high stress capable pie'os off the shelf so to spea!. >et me !now if you find anything. L Gteve hatcher Message /.J2/ (./D8;DJ: /2B/;) <romB %orman Wootan oB +avid Wyland Gub)ectB MRA esting +avid you were correct to assume that we had thought out the testing procedure and yes (to answer your &uestion) we !new e3actly what the outcome of the test would be by adding a 1lump1 resistance to the circuit. *t !ills the over-unity effect 1dead as hell1. All three of the testing parties were told that this would happen. %ow if you would please go bac! to the starting point and read the whole thing over then you will not come bac! and suggest placing a 1lump1 resistance value anywhere in the input circuit to derive a

current value. *t )ust cannot be done this way for it completely alters the MRA into as (al stated 1an ordinary series resonant transformer circuit1. Aut you thin!ing cap on for there has to be a method of determining input current and not 1close the A channel1. What would you say if * told you that "oel and * fine tuned a MRA last night and had the voltage and current wave forms e3actly /2. degrees out of phase at the input of the MRAK Gee there is something real peculiar here for between the pie'o and the coil the phase angle was J. degrees. ,ommentsKK L %orm Message /.JJ7 (./D82DJ: ./B/:) <rom B +avid Wyland oB %orman Wootan Gub)ectB (R) MRA esting * hear you about the lumped resistance. (owever, some resistance insertion must be possibleB at least of the order of the +, resistance of the wires, perhaps .../ ohms. his can be estimated by wire tables for 8. gauge wire. With a very small resistance plus an amplifier you should still be able to get a current waveform reading. (aving the voltage and current /2. out seems strangeX ,ould be, but * would chec! by substituting a +, resistance for the MRA to chec! polarity to be sure. Gtrange things happen to phase with high Y resonant circuits near resonance. %oteB the MRA circuit must have some effective resistance in it. Real amplifiers have some +, output resistance, closed loop or no. *t sounds li!e the tric! is to measure the current without disturbing the circuit. 5ou can still try the current probe too. he ultimate test will be to measure the +, current into an efficient, low power drive amplifier. *f the current to the amplifier drops, as (and don6t forget to decouple it with a cap to ma!e sure the current you are measuring is +,) you move into the good region, then you are in good shape. he amplifier current method is the ultimate methodB the +, output current must be enough to drive the amplifier with some left over for the system to be over unity as a whole. Gay again what drive voltage, pea!-to-pea! you are usingK Food >uc! L +ave Wyland Message //.-; (./D-.DJ: ..B::) <romB "oel Mc,lain oB +avid Wyland Gub)ectB Clac! Co3 est (i +avid L he MRA starts out below unity, and builds up 1steam1 over an hour. *t ta!es time for the harmonics to reach their pea!. 5ou can watch it happen it increments. he secondary side of the input amp 3fmr 1belongs1 to the MRA, so if you need to add resistance, add it to the primary side. When you add it to the secondary side, you modify the device under test. >oo! at it this way...if your car starts rolling down a hill, you can stop it with very little resistance at first. 5ou can also stop the MRA with very little resistance at first. hat6s how transistor circuits are designed so that resonances won6t build up and croa! them... add a small resistance to stop them when they are still small, so they can6t grow. 5ou don6t have to be *% the circuit to measure the power 0 it. *f you want to 1blac! bo31 the MRA, don6t put anything e3tra in the bo3...put it outside (ahead) of the bo3.

>oo! at what is going on in your amplifier... transistors forced near cutoff, A, line current dropping below standby. hen loo! at the nice robust +, power off your bridge. hen go ahead and build the circuit to ma!e it power itself. L "oel

'0aluation of Magnetic Resonance Amplifier 1MRA2


Institute for Ad0anced /tudies @ 'arthTech International3 Inc# (7.-. Cra!er >ane, Austin N ;2;:J L :/8--79--272) +# '# &uthoff & /cott Little 8. "anuary /JJ: A>stract < An MRA device provided by "oel Mc,lain and %orman Wooten was tested for power efficiency. he MRA is essentially a power converter, driven by an audio fre&uency A, voltage and producing a +, output. 0ur tests included meter measurements, made in the manner employed by Mc,lain and Wooten, and digital oscilloscope measurements, which provided high-resolution recording of input voltage and current traces. 0ur meter measurements duplicated the results reported by Mc,lain and Wooten which would appear to indicate over-unity (\/..O efficiency) performance at certain fre&uencies, but only because the reactive behavior of the system is not properly ta!en into account by this measurement procedure. he digital oscilloscope measurements, which correctly account for the effects of circuit reactance, yielded a nearly constant :.O efficiency at all fre&uencies. Introduction < he MRA device we tested consisted of a pie'oelectric transducer connected in series with the primary of a specially constructed, hand-wound transformer. he transformer has a ferrite core and the secondary is connected to a full-wave bridge whose output is connected to a load. Mc,lain and Wooten computed A, input power by determining an e&uivalent resistance R of the MRA, and then substituting that value R, and the closed-circuit MRA input voltage @, into @_8DR to calculate an input power. hey determined this e&uivalent resistance by substituting a decade resistance bo3 in place of the MRA to find the resistance that would yield the same connected-circuit driving voltage. (Guch a procedure is appropriate for purely resistive loads.) *n their most recent tests Mc,lain and Wooten used a small +, motor as a load for the MRA. We used the motor initially to confirm proper operation of our MRA test bed, but replaced it with a /-. ohm resistor to eliminate commutation noise for the tests described below. We also attached a -.,... microfarad filter capacitor across the load resistor to smooth out the +, to ensure accurate measurement with common digital meters. We used two Micronta 88-/2:A meters, one in series with the load to measure current, and one connected across the load and the other meter to measure total voltage delivered to the load and current meter. otal output power is the product of these two &uantities.

o generate the -7 !(' signal needed to drive the MRA we used a #$ <F:.7 Gignal Fenerator amplified with a Aioneer (/.., a modern solid-state /9.-watt audio power amplifier without output transformers. o duplicate the performance of Mc,lain and Wooten6s Radio Ghac! MAA-7:, -:-watt amplifier, we had to add series > (-7 microhenries) and R (//.92 ohms) to our amplifier. Without the series R we only observed a ../. volt droop when driving the MRA at resonance (Mc,lain and Wooten6s amplifier e3hibited a /.:2 volt droop under this loading). Without the series > the anomalous effects were still present but substantially lower in magnitude than those observed by Mc,lain and Wooten. With our amplifier thus modified by the addition of these elements, we have duplicated the Mc,lain-Wooten driver amplifier setup precisely. We used a >e,roy GcopeGtation /7. /..M(' digital oscilloscope with simultaneous sampling on 8 channels to measure MRA input voltage and current. ,urrent was sensed as the voltage drop across the //.92 ohm resistor placed in series with the amplifier output. his resistor was made by placing two 88 ohm, 8 watt carbon comp resistors in parallel to provide the desired resistance with a minimal inductance. &rocedure < We conducted a series of measurements at different fre&uencies. At all times the MRA was connected to the /-. ohm load resistor. At each fre&uency we made the following measurements with the MRA connected to the A, signal sourceB f source fre&uency (measured with a <lu!e 2;) @inMRA voltage across the source terminals with the MRA connected (<lu!e 2;) @out +, voltage across the /-. ohm load resistor and current meter (Micronta) *out +, current through the /-. ohm load resistor (Micronta) @in digital recording of the input voltage trace covering about 7 cycles (>e,roy) *in digital recording of the input current trace simultaneous with @in (>e,roy) At each fre&uency we also disconnected the MRA and measuredB @open the open circuit voltage of the source (<lu!e 2;) We then connected a decade resistance bo3 across the source terminals and by trial-anderror determinedB Re&uiv the resistance re&uired to produce the same driving voltage as with the MRA connected Results < he following table shows these measured &uantities for four different fre&uencies, beginning at resonance and then decreasing. f (!(') --.27 --.:9 @inMRA @open Re&uiv @out *out 8/..9 8-.-9 /7. /2.92 ./-87 8-.27 87..7 /J.. /:..8 ./.92

--.-7 -8.7;

87.8. 87.:2

87./. 87.89

negative negative

J.;: :.82

..9J9 ..-;;

he first entry in the table is at resonance and is characteri'ed by the highest @out value. he second entry has @out at appro3imately 2:O of the ma3imum value as suggested by Mc,lain and Wooten. he digital data for @in and *in are not presented in this table in the interest of brevity. he several pages of digital data generated for each line in this table are, however, available upon re&uest. he ne3t table shows the results of the power calculations, both by the @_8DRe&uiv method used by Mc,lain and Wooten, and by the averaging of @in times *in using the digiti'ed data. Also tabulated are efficiency figures for each method (i.e., output power divided by input power). f +, output @_8DRe&uiv avg @inV*in Mc-W eff @inV*in eff 7.:99 -.89: /.79; .7./ .;2 .:7 :.-9 .7J negative .79 negative .:.

--.27 8.7;-./92 --.:9 /.9.7 .8JJ --.-7 .9;J negative -8.7; ./JJ negative

he figures in columns 8 - 7 are in watts. he last two columns contain ratios. he column labeled 1Mc-W eff1 is the power efficiency calculated by dividing the +, output by the Mc,lain-Wooten input power @_8DRe&uiv. !iscussion < he second row in the table shows the condition that Mc,lain and Wooten interpreted as over-unity performance (e.g., an efficiency of :.-9). he problem lies in the value of /J.. ohms for Re&uiv. his value was obtained because of the small voltage change between open- and closed-circuit conditions (87..7 to 8-.27) measured at that fre&uency. %ote that at even lower fre&uencies, the source voltage was observed to actually increase above the open circuit voltage when the MRA was connected... a condition that Mc,lain and Wooten also observed but did not attempt to analy'e. At first glance this could be interpreted as evidence that the MRA was now feeding power to the source. (owever, this behavior is e3actly what is predicted by classical A, circuit analysis when a load with a net capacitive reactance is driven by a source that has a net inductive reactance. Gince the MRA is essentially a series >, circuit, at fre&uencies below resonance it will e3hibit a net capacitive reactance. he audio amplifier used by Mc,lain and Wooten has an output transformer which, at the MRA operating fre&uency (substantially higher than the middle of the audio range), will e3hibit a noticeable inductive reactance in its output impedance. With such a combination of reactances one cannot, using only the magnitudes of voltage and current, determine the actual power being transferred to the MRA device. *n particular, the Re&uiv method fails as one detunes from resonance because it ignores the effect of reactance. Guch reactance creates a phase shift between voltage and current, a fact well-!nown in the electric power industry as 1power factor.1

<or e3ample, if both voltage and current are sinusoids, true power is given by @V*Vcos(A) where A is the phase angle between the voltage and current waveforms. An e&uivalent method, which is more general because it is applicable to any waveform, is to average the product of the voltage and current waveforms over an integer number of cycles. his is the method we used to obtain the values in the second table in the column 1avg @inV*in1. Conclusion < Cased on the results of our e3perimentation and analysis we find that the MRA device provided by Mc,lain and Wooten does not produce over-unity-efficiency results. he MRA circuit behaves instead as one would e3pect of a loaded transformer with a series capacitor in the primary circuit. When the MRA is detuned from resonance to fre&uencies slightly below resonance, the observed changes may give the impression that the MRA then draws unusually little power from the source while nonetheless maintaining a healthy output. his impression is false. rue power measurements show that the MRA continues to draw about twice as much power from the source as it delivers to the load.

'rror Anal.sis of MRA Test Results


Institute for Ad0anced /tudies @ 'arthTech International3 Inc# /cott Little & +# '# &uthoff / <ebruary /JJ: Introduction < his analysis refers to MRA test results we presented in a separate report dated 8. "anuary /JJ: (MRA #G /.AG, on $eely%et). hese results were based upon measured values of voltage, current, fre&uency and resistance. *n this addendum, the magnitude of e3periment error associated with these measurements is discussed and &uantified. As will become evident below, the error analysis does not detract from our original conclusion, but rather strengthens it. !ata < he tables below are reprinted from the original reportB f (!(') --.27 --.:9 --.-7 -8.7; @inMRA @open Re&uiv @out *out 8/..9 8-.-9 /7. /2.92 ./-87 8-.27 87..7 /J.. /:..8 ./.92 87.8. 87./. negative J.;: ..9J9 87.:2 87.89 negative :.82 ..-;; @8DRe&uiv -./92 .8JJ negative negative avg @inV*in Mc-W eff @inV*in eff 7.:99 .;2 .:7 -.89: :.-9 .7J /.79; negative .79 .7./ negative .:.

f +, output --.27 8.7;--.:9 /.9.7 --.-7 .9;J -8.7; ./JJ

Anal.sis < he data in the second line in these tables is of particular interest. hat is the fre&uency at which the input power determination suggested by Mc,lain and Wooten yields an efficiency of :-9O whereas our input power measurement yields an efficiency of only 7JO. >et us e3amine the individual errors that contribute to the total error in our efficiency measurement (i.e., the ..7J value that appears in the column labeled 1@inV*in eff1 in the second table). his value is the ratio of the +, output power (/.9.7 watts) to the A, input power (-.89: watts in the column labeled 1avg @inV*in1). he +, output power value was obtained by multiplying @out by *out. Coth of these measurements were ta!en with Micronta 88-/2:A digital multimeters. he @out meter was connected across both the /-. ohm load resistor and the current meter so as to include the voltage drop across the current meter so that the power dissipated in that meter would be included in the +, output power determination. *t should be noted that a small amount of power, not included in our original determination was dissipated in the @out meter itself. his meter has a /. megohm input resistance and, at the/: volts present in the 8nd observation, was dissipating 88 microwatts. his should be added to the result of @outV*out to obtain the total output power. <or the 8nd observation, this omission results in a ..../O underestimation of the output power, an error that will be seen to be insignificant when compared to the errors in @out and *out which directly affect the +, output result. he mfgr6s literature on the 88-/2:A meter indicates that our @out measurement accuracy was PD- ..2O relative and the *out measurement accuracy was PD- /.:O relative. hese errors are independent so they add in &uadrature to yield a PD- /.;O uncertainty in the computed +, output (@outV*out). he errors in the avg @inV*in values are more difficult to characteri'e. he digital scope manufacturer6s stated voltage measurement accuracy does not completely describe the errors that occur when two different waveforms are recorded by the scope and multiplied together. here is a finite amount of non-simultaneity (i.e., )itter) in the sampling of the two channels. When the two traces are multiplied together, the resulting error will be highly dependent on the actual waveforms being sampled. herefore we elected to determine the error in the avg @inV*in value empirically. en sets of current and voltage waveforms were ta!en from the MRA device after it had been operating for about an hour to ensure thermal e&uilibrium. he operating conditions were similar to those in the second line of the data tables. he results of the @inV*in averaging for the ten sets were as followsB -.89 -.87 -.8: -.8. -.8. -.8J -./9

-.87 -./2 -.8; he observed standard deviation in these values is PD-...78 watts. his is /.-O of the mean value. ,ombining (in &uadrature) this error with the /.;O error in the +, output power, we get a 8./O relative error e3pected in our 1@inV*in eff1 values. hat is, the ..7J in line 8 should be interpreted as ..7J PD- .../. herefore, there is virtually 'ero chance that the conclusions presented in the original report were wrong due to e3perimental error. 0ur measured efficiency is ..7J PD- .../. he Mc,lain-Wooten value of :.-9 is 72; standard deviations away from our value. he probability of our reading being a chance observation, assuming that such readings e3hibit a normal distribution, is astronomically small.

Clarification of MRA Test Conditions


Institute for Ad0anced /tudies @ 'arthTech International3 Inc# /cott Little & +# '# &uthoff - <ebruary /JJ: A number of persons have commented upon one particular aspect of the test conditions we employed to generate the data presented in our original report, namely the resistor we placed in series with our amplifier output. *t should be noted that this resistor is controversial because the inventors of the MRA device have repeatedly claimed that, when they add such a resistor, the over-unity performance of the MRA is significantly diminished. As we emphasi'ed in our original report, we conducted our tests with a Aioneer /9. watt power amplifier that had a much lower output impedance than the -: watt Radio Ghac! amplifier used by Mc,lain and Wooten. he resistor we added should be considered only as a modification of our power amplifier to ma!e it match Mc,lain and Wooten6s amp. Gome people have suggested that the presence of this resistor is the reason that our MRA device did not produce over-unity results. his is not the case. With the resistor present we observed the same over-unity results claimed by Mc,lain and Wooten when we used their measurement procedure. Gpecifically, at a fre&uency )ust below resonance, where the +, output is about 2:O of ma3imum, we demonstrated with our e&uipment that the Mc,lain and Wooten method of input power determination yields an efficiency of :-9O. *n other words, we reproduced the results of Mc,lain and Wooten perfectly. he MRA wor!ed )ust as they claimed it would. At the same operating fre&uency we recorded high-resolution traces of input voltage and current with our digital scope and used them to compute the true input power to the MRA. his data showed the MRA to be only about :.O efficient.

herefore it was not a matter of MRA performance but a matter of measurement techni&ue that disconfirmed the over-unity results. *n our original report we e3plained why the methods of Mc,lain and Wooten yield erroneous results. <or the basic A, circuit theory that underlies our discussion we would recommend any of a number of e3cellent te3ts on this sub)ect, for e3ample 1Arinciples of >inear %etwor!s1 by <riedland, Wing Q Ash, McFraw-(ill, /J9/

MRA4: Magnetic Resonance Antenna5


<urther research by %orman Wootan, "oel Mc,lain, Robert +. aylor and im and simplified version. 82 Aug /JJ: Tapping A Ne$ Am>ient &o$er /ource (. Resonant 'citation < *t has been discovered that an apparently hitherto un!nown or une3ploited source of ambient power e3ists everywhere on earth (e3trapolating from e3periments in Atlanta, FA and Austin, NI) and from which essentially 1<R##1 energy can be e3tracted at almost no cost, merely by using the $ey ,oncept in the WootanDMc,lain discovery, namely e3ternal armonic e3citation of a saturable core transformer, which causes it to act li!e an Antenna that e3tracts ambient energy in amounts /J times or more than the energy re&uired for the harmonic e3citation. *ndeed, the original MRA design continues to wor! and to e3ceed all original e3pectations. *n the MRA8 configuration, even when the pie'oelectric capacitor has been removed and even when the primary resonant circuit has been cut, it still continues to produce verifiable output powerI All that is re&uired is a single wire from the A, Gignal Fenerator to the saturable-core transformer of the original MRA disclosure in order to cause useful power to be generated in the secondary circuit in amounts vastly greater than the power input from the harmonic Gignal Fenerator. his appears to be an electrical analogue of the chemical phenomenon of ,atalysis, namely the periodic pulses of energy into the transformer 6cataly'e6 the transformer6s nature so that it operates in an apparently hitherto never before seen mode, namely it behaves li!e a novel 6Antenna6 which is e3tracting AMC*#% #%#RF5 from 1somewhere1I *t is not necessary to understand completely at this time what the source of Ambient #nergy may be, in order to e3ploit the phenomenon in an environmentally benign way for the benefit of man!ind. %umerous maveric! scientists and engineers have suggested that there may be hitherto un!nown aspects of electromagnetic radiation not comprehended in the standard Ma3well6s #&uations, such as the controversial 1scalar waves1 postulated by retired Air <orce ,olonel om Cearden. Retired physicist Freg (odowanec, who duplicated the MRA independently after learning about it from the %ew #nergy %ews newsletter, which reproduced the internet

announcement of Wootan and Mc,lain, suggests that the ambient energy comes from the earth6s gravitational field and is somehow being converted into electrical energy. <ormer C54 professor of Ahysics Q Astronomy, +r. Cob Cass speculates that MRA8 (as was the original MRA/) may be somehow tapping the ambient electromagnetic energy !nown to e3ist in the #arth-*onosphere ,avity in the form of Gchumann Resonances which are continually resupplied every time a lightning bolt from a cloud stri!es the earth. 1As e3plained in the Gecond #dition of "ac!son6s classical boo! on #lectromagnetism, the great genius %i!ola esla discovered the Gchumann resonances e3perimentally :. years before Gchumann predicted them theoretically,1 says Cass, who adds that he once calculated that 1every cubic meter of space near the surface of the earth contains on the order of one !ilowatt of standing waves, similar to those in a microwave oven e3cept at vastly reduced fre&uencies, which no one !nows how to e3tract efficiently.1 0r do theyK he late 4tah inventor Moray, author of a boo! entitled 1 he Gea of #nergy in Which the #arth <loats1, astounded famous scientists in the /J8.s and /J-.s with never-e3plained demonstrations of his ability to e3tract !ilowatts from 6nowhere6 at will, anywhere (even randomly selected points in the desert), using his une3plained Moray @alve. Moray submitted a Aatent Application, but withdrew it and his secret died with him. Admirers of Moray point out that his writings included the words 1Fermanium triode1 decades before the ransistor was discovered by Cell >abs scientists (who won a %obel Ari'e) and who had been directed into solid-state physics by the late (arvey <letcher, who had earlier witnessed Moray6s wor! and been shown every detail e3cept the secret of the vest-poc!et-si'ed Moray @alve. A recent controversial theory of Austin *nstitute for Advanced Gtudy physicist (al Authoff and his collaborators (aisch and Rueda appears to e3plain gravity as not an intrinsic property of matter but as an indirect conse&uence of Ma3wellian electromagnetic radiation, namely that (as earlier suggested by the late Russian dissenter Ga!harov) gravity is a 1shadow effect1 similar to the accepted ,asimir #ffect of &uantum electrodynamics. Cass points out that if the (aisch-Authoff-Rueda theory is correct then (odowanec6s idea of tapping the earth6s gravity field in some electromagnetic way not hitherto suggested is conceivable. Whatever the Ambient #nergy Reservoir into which the MRA is tapping, the novel phenomenon is real and deserving of e3haustive further investigation, according to elated inventors Wootan, Mc,lain, aylor and Mc,rac!en, who urge independent investigators to see! to replicate their discovery.

&arts /ources *or The MRA


"oel and %orm now report that stranded wire seems to be re&uired in order to see the strange effects. he transducer used in the $eelynet device was obtained from a surplus source local to e3as. We6re trying to trac! down more of them. hey apparently came from an industrial plastic welder.

A >ead Hirconate itanate pie'o transducer can be had from (QR ,orp, but its dimensions areB 81 dia 3 ../1 thic!, not the same as the original $eelynet device. *t has a 7:$(' resonance. Will it wor!K +unno. hey have several hundred in stoc!. (QR also carries numerous ceramic magnets, but it6s un!nown whether or not any are close enough to %orm6s original that they will wor!. hey offer one large ceramic magnet, 7 3 - 3 /1, and have only about :. in stoc!. his magnet has its poles on the flat magnet face, and has W0 poles on each face. At least two !inds of ceramic magnet e3istB Carium ferrite and Gtrontium ferrite. *t is not !nown whether both types wor! in this device. (QR ,o.,/2 ,anal Gt [---- his place has a FR#A surplus mail order catalogI A0 Co3 /88, Cristol, AA /J..;-./88 2..-272-2../ Your Support Maintains this Service -- and Your Survival ...
The

Rex Research Civilization Kit

... It's Your Best Bet & Investment in Sustainable Humanity on Earth ... Everything re!research.com" plus the Bonus #iles $% & '(%E( )*+E ,, -./" )ostpaid *ny0here 11

(e! (esearch" )'B .2345" 6ean" 78 925.2 :S*

You might also like