Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Web Site: www.ijettcs.org Email: editor@ijettcs.org, editorijettcs@gmail.com Volume 2, Issue 6, November December 2013 ISSN 2278-6856
Prof. & Head, Dept. of Comp. Applns. (DoCA), J.J. College of Engg. & & Tech., Tiruchy-620009. 2 Asst. Prof., Dept. of Comp. Applns., JJCET, Trichy- 620009. 3 Head, Marssitech Pvt., Ltd., Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu- India
the patients level of risk. Grades are categorized as A, B, C, D, F, G, H, I and K is described in Table 1. Table 1: Grade point The Table describes about grade point and its expansion
Grade point Description
A-Alcohol B-Blood Pressure CCholesterol D-Diet E-Eye G-Get active H-Heart disease I-Immunity level K-Kidney F-Feet
High hemoglobin alcohol level High Blood Pressure High Blood Cholesterol Poor diet and obesity Unrecognized diabetic eye disease Lack of physical activity Unrecognized risk of heart disease Influenza vaccination, pneumococcal vaccination Unrecognized diabetic kidney disease Unrecognized diabetic foot disease
Keywords: Diabetic Mellitus, Heart Attack, Stroke Prediction, Genetic Algorithm, Risk Factors, Disease
I. INTRODUCTION
The diagnosis of diseases is a vital job in medicine. The epidemic is accelerating in the developing world like in India, with an increasing proportion of affected people in elder age groups. Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder characterized by chronic hyper glycaemia with disturbances of carbohydrate, fat and protein metabolism. Heart disease is a major cause now a days and it kills one person every 34 seconds in the United States [13]. High blood pressure, coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, stroke are the various forms of cardio vascular disease which affects the heart and blood vessels. The development of screening methods for these diseases prediction is an immediate practical interest. Screening is the process of identifying every individual who are at sufficiently high risk of a specific disorder to warrant further investigation or direct action. The purpose of screening is to benefit the individuals being screened. Soft computing method is very well suited to analyze medical data so as to find out the risks strategy. Genetic Programming (GP) is a Machine Learning (ML) technique used to obtain the optimized solution for the user specified tasks. The proposed model will focus the prediction of risks prone to either heart attack or stroke possibilities from the diabetes population data. This model focuses an early detection for the above said diseases (Heart attack and Stroke). The model also provides out of risk process and grade points according to Volume 2, Issue 6 November December 2013
Figure 1: Proposed Model of diabetic risk analysis A. Risk Factors for diabetic analysis, heart attack risk analysis and stroke risk analysis Screening of risk among diabetes patients are implemented based on the input data set constructed and are detailed in Table 2, Table 3, and Table 4. The Table 2 explains the input data related to diabetic patients. Heart attack and stroke risk factors included in the analysis these are explained in Table 3 and Table 4 respectively. Table 2: Heart attack risk analysis value and their weightage Parameters Male and Weightage Age < 30 Weightage Value 0.1 Page 61
Smoking
FBS
OGTT
0.8 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.8
Blood pressure
Blood sugar
Heart Rate
Table 3: Diabetic analysis risk factor weightage and their calculation Parameters Weightage Weightage Value Male and Female Age >25 0.1 >30 to <50 0.3 Age >40 and Age 0.7 <70 0.8 Age >70 Smoking Never 0.1 Past 0.3 Current 0.6 Obesity Yes 0.8 No 0.1 Alcohol intake Never 0.1 Past 0.3 Current 0.6 Physical Exercise Never 0.6 Regular 0.1
Table 4: Stroke analysis risk factor weightage and their calculations Parameters Weightage Weightage Value Male and Female Age < 30 <50 0.1 Age >50 0.3 Smoking Never 0.1 Past 0.3 Current 0.6 Obesity Yes 0.8 No 0.1 Total cholesterol Very High>200 0.9 High 160 to 200 0.8 Normal <160 0.1 Hypertension Normal(130/89) 0.1 Heart disease Yes 0.2 No 0.1 Diabetes Yes 0.2 No 0.1 Triglycerides Normal 0.5 (<190mg/dl) 0.8 Medium(200 0.9 400mg/dl) High(>240 mg/dl)
Page 62
LDL
Figure 2: Prediction of diabetic patients risk level (High) which prone to heart attack
Figure 7: Prediction of Heart Attack Risk level (High) Figure 3: Grade Point indicator (H Grade)
Figure 4: Prediction of diabetic patients risk level (High) which prone to Stroke Volume 2, Issue 6 November December 2013
V. CONCLUSION
In this proposed work, the soft computing based model is developed for finding the risks accumulated by the diabetic patients. The experimental results pertaining to the level of risk which prone to either heart attack or stroke. Table 5 explains the total samples used out of which 07 samples are predicted as Prone to Heart Attack, 06 samples are Prone to Stroke and remaining 07 samples are belongs to the prediction category of Out of Risk. This model would definitely assist the physician in order to diagnose the patients properly. Finally, the doctors can able to find out the sensitivity [The proportion of people with disorder to test positive on the screening test] and specificity [The proportion of people who do not have the disorder to test negative on the screening test] of the screening process. Table 5: Data Sample Total Samples Prone to Heart attack M 20 5 2 07 4 2 6 07 F Total M Prone to Stroke F Total Out Of Risk
VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I extend my sincere thanks to our college Chairman, Prof.K.Ponnusamy, J.J. Group of Institutions, Dr.S.Sathiyamoorthy, Principal, Dr.P.Shahul Hameed, Director, Environmental Research Centre, J.J. College of Engg. & Technology. Also I extend my thanks to Dr.A.Vijay Anand who offered patients data.
REFERENCES
[1] Anooj P K Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS): Risk Level prediction of heart disease using weighted fuzzy rules, Journal of King Saudi University Computer and Information Sciences, 24, 27-40, 2012. [2] Brindle P, Besmick A, Fahey T, Ebrahim S, Accuracy and impact of risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review, Heart, 2006; 92: 175. Volume 2, Issue 6 November December 2013 Page 65