You are on page 1of 70

The

New
Art

of Writing Plays

PUBLIC

AT

IONS

of

the

Dramatic

Museum

OF

COLUMBIA

UNIVERSITY

IN

THE

CITY

OF

NEW

YORK

First

Seriei

Papers
I

on

Playmaking
NEW de ART

THE

OF

WRITING

PLAYS.

By
T. and

Lope
Brewster. Notes

Vega.
With

Translated

by
Introduction

William

an

by

Brander

Matthews.

II

THE Bronson

AUTOBIOGRAPHY Howard. With Thomas.

OF

PLAY. tion Introduc-

By

an

by

Augustus

III

THE

LAW

OF

THE

DRAMA.

By

Ferdinand

Brunetiere.

Translated With Introduction


an

by

Philip by
Henry

M.

Hayden.
Arthur

Jones.

IV

ROBERT

Louis

STEVENSON

AS

DRAMATIST. duction Intro-

By

Arthur and

Wing

Pinero.

With

an

Bibliographical

Appendix

by

Clayton

Hamilton.

PAPERS

ON

PLAY-MAKING

I
The
New Art

of

Writing

Plays

BY

LOPE

DE

VEGA

TRANSLATED

BY

WILLIAM

T.

BREWSTER

WITH

AN

INTRODUCTION

BY

BRANDER

MATTHEWS

Printed

for

the

Dramatic

Museum
in

of
the

Columbia
New York

University

City of
MCMXIV

COPYRIGHT

1914

BY

DRAMATIC

MUSEUM

OF

COLUMBIA

UNIVERSITY

CONTENTS

Introduction

by

Brander

Matthews
i

The

New

Art

of

Writing

Plays

by

Lope

de

Vega.
.

23

Notes

by

B.

INTRODUCTION

BY
in

significant

coincidence of the

the drama

lous marvel-

outflowering
in

is

multaneo si-

Spanish

literature

and

English.
resources

Spain
in

almost

exhausted
out

her invincible
nerve

mense im-

fitting

the

Armada;
to

and

England
the defeat
the

strained of the of
as a

every

compass

dread

fleet.

Lope

de

Vega,

foremost sailed the that

the

Iberian
on

playwrights,
the it is fatal
voyage

actually
to

soldier

English Shakspere
the
year

channel;
also

and

dimly
on

possible
blue
water;

saw

service

of his

the

ning run-

sea

fight
which
we

is

one

of
no

those

in

biography
and

about

have has

information,
been

his
an

use

of

sea-terms

declared
accurate.

by
In

expert

to

be

scientifically
development

this
in

simultaneous

of
at

the
moment

drama

England
the
to

and

in

Spain
two

the

when
aroused of

energy

of
utmost,

the
we

peoples
a

was

the

have that

confirmation

Brunetiere's
our

theory
in

the

foundation is the
assertion

of

pleasure
the human

the will.

playhouse

of

Shakspere
drama of for had and

came

forward

after

the
a

lish Engvariety
broken

already
he found and he

developed
the
road

forms;
him

by
At however

Marlowe first far the


was

Kyd,

by
in

Lyly
their he
was

and

Greene.

followed

steps, footto

beyond Lope pioneer;


in of have his

them de he

advance other blazed

in

end.
a

Vega,
it all
was

on

the who
ceeding suc-

hand,
the

new

trails

which

the

playwrights Shakspere
seems

Spain
cared

gladly
little

trod. for

to

vention, inand

borrowing everywhere,
for the and

plots

anywhere
his

reserving
of the

imagination
first hand told

interpretation Lope,
rather
on

tales other

by

others. abounded

again,
in the

in

invention he
was

than

terpreti in-

imagination;
fecund and
even

wonderfully
in

prolific, unsurpassed by
Defoe the
were or

tivity producIt
was

Dumas. that Calderon It of


was

he all

who the

made
rest

pattern
to

ana

employ.
formula

he

who

worked

out

the
not

the
at

Spanish
all
term,

comedia,

often

comedy
of the

in

our

English
rather blooded
a

understanding play
heroes of

but hoton

intrigue,
who
wore

peopled
their

with hearts

their the

sleeves hilts of

and their

who

carried

their

hands

on

swords. de

Where

Lope
alike for

Vega they

and both

Shakspere
wrote

are

again plays

is that the these and

all

their

popular

theater,
with

apparently
a

composing performance praise


which

pieces solely caring


be

view for

to

nothing
from

any

might

derived in his
243,

tion. publicaof the

Martinenche,
'Comedia
on

study note)

Espagnole'
carelessness be
won

(p.

dwells
nown re-

Lope's
to

for the

the

literary
of his
poems

by
in his
as

printing

matic drahe have


ratives nar-

poems; took

non-dramatic

pride, just carefully


altho

Shakspere proofs
did
not

seems

to

read

the he
one

of

his

lyrical
choose And

himself

to

publish
liere, it
he of he
was

single
may

of

his

plays.
us

Mothat

be

noted,

tells

frankly
the

completely
earlier been his hand

satisfied
on

with

success

his had

pieces
content

the leave

stage,
them

and

that

to

unprinted lisher. pirate-pub-

until

was

forced

by

Shakspere
the
to art

is

abundant and

in reticent

his in In

allusions his

to

of
art

acting
of

illusions is

the

playmaking. expression
3

fact, there
of his

no

single

recorded

opinion

in

regard

to

the
and

principles
here he who

or

the

practice

of
trast con-

dramaturgy;
with doctrine
in well

is in had

marked
a

Ben about

Jonson,
the

body
set

of

drama,
and

which in his with

he

forth
as

his
as

'Discoveries'
in

prologs,
Drummond

his

conversations
In

of

Hawthornden.

general

Lope's
is the he of

attitude
same as

toward

dramaturgic
but
on

theory
one

Shakspere's;
to

occasion

was

duced inart

discuss
and
to

the

principles
his

the

he

adorned,

express

opinions
was

upon

its methods. he
upon
was

This
to

single
deliver of

occasion
a

when address in This

persuaded
the 'New Art

poetic Plays

Making

Age.'
This
este

'Arte
was

neuvo

de

hazer

comedias
in

en

tiempo'
of

originally
de
was

published
Madrid,

the
A

'Rimas'

Lope
reprint

Vega,
issued New
an

1609.
Mr.
Archer 1903.

facsimile
M.

by

Huntington
edition

in

York

in

A and in the

critical
notes

with Morel-Fatio

introduction

by

A.

appeared

Bulletin

Hispanique
and also in
a

for

October-December,

190.4
French
as

"

separate the of of
4

pamphlet.
of

The

editor

accepts the
year

year

publication
and

probably
the

delivery; Madrid,

he

believes

Academy

before

whom
one

the of

poem

was

read,

to

be

"no

doubt imitated

those

literary flourishing
at

assemblies,
in

from their

those

Italy
of
some

and

holding
cultivated

meetings

the

house

gentleman." Lope's
metrical of of It this is the
on

address Horace's countless is the


as

is

plainly epistle
critical
to

mote re-

imitation

the
.

Pisos,
cast

the

model
verse.

codes
ample ex-

into of

chief

Spanish

type, chief

Boileau's

'Art
and

Poetique' Pope's example.


imitations and
more

French the of

example
chief

'Essay

Criticism'
most

English
Horatian

While have for

these

their

main

topic
poetry, borrow

poetry
tempts at-

especially
were

dramatic
to

not

lacking

the and
in

miliar faas

form
a

for
are

non-literary
a

themes;
poems

result

there tongues

host the

of 'Art

all and

the the

modern 'Art of and late


as

on

of 'Art

War' of

Painting,'
on

on

the of of the

ing' BookbindEven
tury censo

the first

'Art half

Cookery.'
the

the

nineteenth

Samson condensed his


on

(of

Comedie-Fran^aise)
advice into

histrionic 'Art of

riming

couplets
Most

the those which

Acting.'
of Horace's and dactic dithe

of
poem

imitations deal
5

with

poetry

drama

borrow method

from but also

the

Latin of

lyrist
their

not

only

their The theater

much

material.

supersubtle
were

Italian
on

theorists Horace
were
even

of

the when

relying
that these

they

supposed
and

they

interpreting
of Horace for the
all

Aristotle;
had

expounders
enactments

elaborated which desired Classicist

legislative
were

theater

readily purification
of it the
a

accepted
of for made the

by
drama.

_who
Tim
was

the

code

rules
was

playwrights
up

mainly
restrictions him

negative;
upon
to

largely
;

of

poet's things
It

freedom but

it

dered or-

do

few

it forbad the adj

him

to

do

many

things.
of

prescribed comedy,
the

I
'

total

separation nothing

tragedy

and into serious


upon

mitting
and

humorous

former from the

excluding
It of

everything severely
It of

latter.

insisted

the the

austere

dignity
to

tragedy.
all
to
scenes

told

dramatist and
narrate

avoid
him

violence;
to

it

vised adall

use

messengers
not

events

which

might
Above

be

exhibited
stress

with the
manding de-

propriety.
strict

all, it laid
of the Three

upon

observance that the


to

Unities should stage;


in
one

playwright
set
on

have that he

but should

one

story show

the action

this

single
6

place

only

and

that

this

single action,
be

shown

in

single place,
in
,

should

begun

and

completed

single day.
'New Art like of

Lope's
familiar rather is
ease

Making

Plays'
'Ars

is

not

epistle
it
a

Horace's discourse

Poetica';

familiar
an

having speech.
of It

the
sists con-

playful
of

of series

afterdinner of

paragraphs
four
verse,
two to

irregular
lines each.

length, varying
It is written that
are

from blank last

forty

in the in

hendecasyllabics,
of
every

except

lines

graph para-

rime.

These

terminal
common

couplets
in and
serve

recall

the

riming

exit-speeches

contemporary both
cases

Elizabethan

drama;
the rimes end of of

in
to

apparently
the

heighten

emphasis
At the into
"

at

the

the his

torical rhedress, adten

period. Lope
lines in that

conclusion Latin
ten

drops
tongue These
or

and of

inserts

lines
verses

fied unidentibe his

origin.
own

Latin

may

composition
some

they
poem.

may

yet
are

be

traced

to

overlooked with
device
a

They
of the the thus

brought by
the

into

harmony

the of
in

rest

work
last

ingenious
line with

riming Spanish,
learned These
7

Latin
a

line
in

making
and

couplet
half
in

half the

the

language
two

vernacular.

hybrid

lines

are

immediately couplet, Spanish


translation
so

followed that the there


ten
are

by

the

usual three Latin. Latin rime

terminal lines In
verse

only
of the

in

after

lines

the

which rendered

follows into

has Professor Professor

been

English Perry.

by

Edward Rennert of

Delavan
in

his

authoritative declares in humor


a

ography bithat

Lope
"is vein

(p.

179)

Lope's spirit,
the
take

address and
a

written

bantering pervades
did
not

of

good

whole the
on

poem.
matter

Lope
very

evidently
nor

seriously,
was

reflect
say.

deeply probably
write it took media. lacks careless
sense

what did 'New


to not

he

about him much

to

It
to

take Art of
as

longer Plays'

the him

Making
many

than
a co-

write

lines

of

The

versification,
habitual sometimes
ease

strangely
and

enough,
it is the

Lope's
and is this
not

fluency;
while

halting,
"

always
treatise

clear,
was

an

additional

sign

that

hastily
that the times

composed."
'Arte Nuevo'

Morel-Fatio
was

notes

reprinted
at

only
Madrid

three in and

during
and in
1621

Lope's
and
poem

life-time,
at

1613
he for

Hueva

in

1623;

finds

the of

itself

ample

explanation
was

its lack leader

ularity. pop-

Lope

the
8

superb

of

an

astounding
drama;
delivered and

development
he himself address he tells had

of
us

the that

Spanish
when he

this five of

already
Yet
no

written
utters
no

nearly
paean

hundred

plays.
he blows

lie

triumph;
to

bugle-blast
other himself the ards standwas

of

defiance than

the

defenders which

of he

those he fervor does

under
not

fighting;
and the

anticipate
were

ardor Victor

which
to

to

animate he
to

Hugo's
stand
to

preface
his
guns
on

'Cromwell';
and

does he

not

point
stage
as

what
own

has

accomplished
and
as

the

his

cation justifithe ing cavilto

sufficient His

answer

to

of humble of
own

criticasters.
and

attitude he of admits

seems

be

apologetic;
Classicist he code

the and the

ity validin his

the defence call


a

rules;
what and

proffers
of

only

yers law-

plea
that

confession would have

avoidance,
the he hest behad

declaring
of been

he

obeyed
if

the

learned

theorists the of

only
He

permitted
the

by

public.
all his
on

edges acknowlworks

faultiness the since

dramatic

and

throws taste,
who

blame

the

depravity

of

public
We

live

to

please,

must

please

to

live.

He

supports

his

acceptance
9

of

the

Classi-

cist
and

doctrine with

with mention

brave

show

of

erudition
Ro-

of

Cicero,

Donatus,

bortello, Athenaeus,
Pietro Fatio
no

Julius

Pollux,

Manetti,
Valerus

Plutarch, Maximus,
and
Morel-

Xenophon,
and

Crinito declares

Vitruvius;
this of

that

pedantic

parade being

has
rived de-

solid

foundation from
on

scholarship,
two

entirely
the the
commentator commentator

writers,
and
and

Donatus, Robortello,
on

Terence,
on

Aristotle

ace. Hor-

In

this

second-hand

echoing
the great

of

the

co-

difiers

of

critical reveals

theory
no

Spanish
of
pretation, inter-

playwright

independence
without

accepting
he
never

question
commentaries the for the
tors commenta-

ever whatand

has

found himself valid


so

in

the whether

asking
had
any

reason

rules
In

they
other

laid

down the

authoritatively.
Nuevo' of
acumen,

words,

'Arte

does
any
or

not

disclose

Lope's
or

possession
any

critical
even

curiosity
of
any

of

critical
in

real

interest We

the
no

discussion

of

critical that

theories. those
as

have
endowed

right
with
was,

to

expect
creative

richly
Lope

the

faculty
also

as

indisputably
share of the of the

should

have

an

equal

critical of

faculty.
their
own

The

analysis

principles
10

special

art

by

the

poets into but

and the

painters
critical

and
arena

playwrights
is

who

venture

always
and technic it

interesting
is
that

it is

rarely
And
most

philosophic
it is of his
to

generally Lope

technical. devotes the down and advice tells

discourse. of the
to
new

He

trips lightly
drama;

the then
on

history
he

Spanish

proceeds aspiring
novices it wants, methods that

stow be-

practical playwrights.
must

young

He the

these what
best

they
he' ling tickHe
in

give

public
as

and of

counsels the descends

them
taste

to

the

of minute

the

uncritical

playgoer.
details;
of in
a

to

practical
are

and,
veteran

short,
of for In the
a

his

suggestions supplying

those

craft

lessons

playwriting

correspondence-school.
so

far
at

as

Lope

lays
are

down but

any

critical tion codificaHis

principles
of address his is
on

all, these
own

the

instinctive "the

practise.
of
a

like the
"

speech
of
a

carpenter he has

standing just

peak
to

building

erected"

borrow himself and and As

Richter's succeeded his


were

sarcastic
as a

phrase. practical

Lope

had

playwright;

plays
put

had

tain cer-

characteristics in
a

together plays
do had well

certain the

fashion.

these would

pleased

public, beginners
1 1

to

consider this

these fashion.
most

characteristics He
utters

and

to

low folommendations rec-

his

shrewd with

unpretentiously,
and

no

hint of his

of

arrogance

with modest

friendly
precepts
ideal ideal is

ity genialstand
more

tone.

Behind

his which

own

plays
made

in

his

sharply
of

manifest.

Lope's

is that

all his

contemporaries,
in

including footsteps
It for is that

Calderon and the often stage for

(who
borrowed is

followed his

his

plots).

intended in

primarily
action
a

story-telling,
tale of which

presenting
excite He story the bids with
in

serial

shall

constant

interest

curiosity. together
the his dations foun-

the the the

beginner
utmost

to

put

care,

laying

first for of the

act,

contriving
second until and

unexpected concealing
very

complications
the
moment

the

solution

action
as

the the

last

possible,
may

otherwise
go out,

tors specta-

get

up

and
end. and

when

once

they
stress

can

foresee

the

He

lays

all of
as

his

upon

adroitness
and

ingenuity
remarks
seem

ing; plot-buildhe
makes

such

casual

upon

character-delineation thus the altho

perfunctory. importance
Aristotle,
of this.

In of
"

emphasizing
action he

the is

primary echoing
not
aware

Lope probably

only
was

12

And under that

the the of

practise lead their of

of

the

Spanish
was

playwrights
akin
to

Lope

closely
the

contemporaries,
the lead lead of of

English
and

playwrights
later Fletcher. Beaumont
on

under the Like and the


as

Kyd,
Beaumont in his

again
and

under

Lope,
Fletcher

Kyd
in Poets

way

and

theirs,

were

tellers storyall of
on

stage.

they they

were

them,

but
on

playwrights
and

depended
on

plot,
"

suspense

especially by

surprize
of

often character. The

achieved

only

contradiction

abiding
It the

interest resides

of

the

'Arte in the in

Nuevo'
sugges-

is two-fold. tiveness of of

partly

elementary
which the for
art

lessons here which

the

art to

playmaking,
in aid of of Gold. the

Lope
and

proffers
are

apprentices
as
an

able invaluthe the


riously cu-

proper

appreciating playwrights partly


taken

methods

Spanish
It resides

of the

Age

in

deprecating
toward his
own

attitude

by
he
was

Lope
proaching ap-

works,

altho of his

the

pinnacle
didactic

fame Is in his

when the

he great

penned

this

poem.

Spanish
before

playwright
the
code

sincere the
"

humility
Is his

of

Classicists?
or

self-abasement

genuine
13

is

it

ironic?

Morel-Fatio

follows it in
at

Menendez face
book

Pelayo
Guillaume

in

accepting
Huszar,
the

its useful

value.
on

his

Corneille when he

and

Spanish
to

theater,

thinks his
own

that

Lope
is that
not

pretends
to

disparage

plays
confess latter evidence is rather

be

taken

seriously.
to

I this

I and

should there

like is of
some

agree

with

view;
in
in

little But the

internal balance

port sup-

it. former be

favor est hon-

of

the
may

opinion.

Yet

however
to

Lope's

willingness
code which
a

do

penance
to

to

the

Classicist

he

admits

have all.

outraged,
He
as

his

is

proud
abased

humility
and have
care as

after

is
some

not

really
of his

as

tive plain-

critics
takes

asserted.
to

Modest his
own

as

he

may

be, he

make easy

position
and of his

plain.

For

all

his for

attitude

tolerant
on

geniality,
the
one

all his and his


not

lightness pedantic
fail
a

touch
on

side he of

citation
on

the

other,

does

to

ihsist

his

authorship
to

nearly
his

half

thousand he has

plays

and

remind succeeded he had


success.

auditors
in

that
N

continuously
even

pleasthe

ing the
,

public,
order
assumes

tho win
a

to

violate

rules
v

in

to

this detached

Lope
tone

attitude

and

his has

is

bantering,

as

Professor
"4

Rennert

suggested.
intense
own

He

does interest

not

here

display analysis
of

the his all

personal
work which

in the and in

glows

burns of the

thru French of

Corneille's dramatic

'Examens,'

spite

poet's
from of the the in

occasional strict letter of

confession the of law.

lapse
has
none

Lope
mous fathe

prophetic

fire

Hugo's
of

preface plays
he
was

anticipatory
to

defence
In

going deny
of that

write. this
poem

fact, it is
is
a

difficult careless

to

pretty
an

piece
evoked the

work,
a

tossed

off

in

idle it

hour,
behooved

by

special
to

occasion
assume a

when

speaker
But that

precatory self-dethe
y

attitude.

it

is

not

mentable "la-

palinode"
called termed

Menendez what Mr.

Pelayo Ormsby

it;
it

nor

is it the

exactly

(in

Quarterly
the

Review manifesto

for

uary, Janof
a

1894) triumphant
who,
while for the cared
or

"virtually
dictator,
a

dramatic the will his which

Napoleon
spect re-

professing sovereign
to

profoundest
of the

public,
for its

scarcely

hide

contempt

intelligence
he
says,

its taste, called he

foreign
or

critics,
to to

justly
fact
and

barbarous;
owed his

guise dishis its

the

that

power

knowledge
weaknesses."

adroit That

manipulation
scholars
'5
so

of

well

equipt

for and the


nert,
can

the
so

consideration well fitted character and


as

of for the
as

Spanish

literature of Ren-

interpretation Ormsby
and
y

Spanish

Morel-Fatio
take

Menendez
as

Pelayo

views

conflicting
this
"

those

severally positive
sary neces-

expressed
tl.at

by
has

them,
not

is the

proof pains

Lope
to

taken

make

his
was

position willing
code in the
as

clear.
at

While

Lope
to

least

to

render
one

lip-service
of his

the

of

the

Classicists,
Tirso of de the

followers

theater,
the author
Don

lina, Moest earliin in is iting lima

(best

known

dramatization his

of de

the

Juan

legend)

'Cigarrales
fifteen in the
years

Toledo,'
after

published
address,
any

1624,
bold

Lope's
of
or

denying
duration of
scene,

the

validity
of time

rule

forbidding
'Unites
in

change

(See
29 seq.

Breitinger's
) But
Cervantes

d' Aristote' first part four

pp.

the
in

of

'Don

Quixote,'
before the

published delivery
a

1605,
'Arte of

years

of

the lack

Nuevo,'

had for is of the

revealed the
no

plentiful

sympathy
There

so-called

Aristotelian the

rules. his

disputing
of of the
16

irony
who

in manded de-

portrait
the

Canon

Toledo "some

appointment
person
at

intelligent
to

and

sensible

capital

examine

all those that

plays

before

they
in the
to

were

acted,

not

only
all

produced
were

capital
be seal

itself, but
in

intended whose

acted and

Spain;

without
no

approval,
should

signature,
any

local acted."

magistracy

allow

play

to

be

(Ormsby's xlviii).
Earlier that he

translation,
remarks
was

ii, 387,
of the with

chapter
Canon whole foot-note calls Canon's

show Classicist
to

us

familiar

code;

indeed,
of

Ormsby
this

(in chapter)
of

his
to

translation the substantial those

attenion

identity expressed
for

the Sir In than

opinions Sidney
work in

with the

by

Philip
another
two

'Apology
fiction in
are

Poesy.'
more

of

written 'Nicholas

centuries of

later,
we

the

Nickelto
a

by'

Dickens,
whose than in of the
vext

introduced is who

Mr.

Murdle
vaguer
strenuous

knowledge
Canon's insistence but
upon

obviously
is

the his

quite
vation preser-

as

"the

unities."

Into

the of

question
and here. each

of of It

the

personal
it be is

tions relanot

Cervantes
to enter

Lope,

needful
to

would

pleasant
the

believe of
not

that the

really
but

appreciated

genius
this
not

other;

however Cervantes the

pleasant
seems

is
to

quite
have

possible.

suspected

greatness

of

his had had

own

masterpiece; special
fondness

and

it is for his
must at

plain plays,
have the
a

that which

he

not

succeeded.
of

Lope
own

been of

conscious
all

his poets he

position
he

head humble less that his

Spanish
when

might
the
but

assume

attitude five had the

was

author

of time
to

than he

hundred
more

plays
than of
a

by

the

thousand

pieces
is his
no

credit ing. becom-

garment

humility
in

longer
'Comedia Morel-Fatio

Martinenche

Espain

gnole' pointing
what
1

(pp.
out

113-4) Lope's

follows later

satisfaction
even

with
extent

he

had

accomplished,
for himself which stage. consider
as a

to

the

of
new

claiming
type the When of

the had

invention established

of

the

play

itself

on

Spanish
we

the

extraordinary
in

vogue

of of

Lope

playwright
and

the

Golden fusion difwe

Age

Spanish
of his fame

literature thruout

the

swift when

Europe,

recall

his
we

unparalleled
remember

productivity,
supreme
a

and

when

his of

importance

as

representative
modern
to

superb
we

development
fail
to

of

the

drama,
discover
been

cannot

be
tempt atto

surprised
has the

that
made
to

no

adequate
present
In him

ever

English

reading

public.
18

French

there

are

two

translations

of
and

selections
are

from also
in

his

dramatic

works;
into
or

there

varied

renderings
there

German.

But
Lord

English
in and

is little analized the


and
more

nothing.
the 'Star

Holland Seville' into and founded

1787
turned

of

striking episodes
was
on

lish; Engon

it

this Mrs. of

summary

these her

fragments
five
act

that

Kemble

'Star had the in the


in

Seville' utilized of his A and in

published Lope's
'Padre ted,' Outwit-

in

1837.

Holcroft in

Engafiado'

plot

'Father

published Lope's
had moved been F.

1805.
'Romeo

perversion Juliet'
and

of

play

on

story this

issued W. in
y

English
to

1770;

Cosens

print

(for

private
of sixth Alfred
a

distribution)
'Castelvines volume Bates and of 'Gardener's These of

1869

careful

translation In the

Montreses'.

'The

Drama,'
in
1903,

edited there

by
is

published
the 'Perro

lation trans-

del

Hortelano,'
H. and
H.

(the

Dog')

by

W.

Chambers.
parently ap-

scattered represent

versions
all

perversions Lope's
into desired issued in the dramatic
our

of

work

which It

has is

found
to

its way be be

guage. lanat

greatly might
'Star

that

least
to

one

volume the

English
'Gard-

contain

of
19

Seville,'

ener's 'Duchess

Dog,'
of of his

the Malfi'

'Romeo

and and

Juliet,'
also the

and

the

plays,
Honor,'

the

sician 'Phy-

own

and Calderon's in

'Alcalde rehand-

of

Zalamea,'
are

of

which accessible

lings
free
A

already

Fitzgerald's

rendering.
few scattered
were

passages

from

the

'Arte

Nuevo' Lord

turned
and

into

English
of in those G.

couplets
were

by
rowed bor-

Holland;

some

(without stimulating
in

credit)
of An derived of the

H.

Lewes's sued isplete incomthe

study
1846.

Spanish

Drama,
and from

inadequate mainly
Dumas-Hinard,

version,
French included Catholic is translation in

was

an

essay

on

Lope

published
1878.

in

the

World

for abstract

September,
in of Professor

There

careful

Rennert's

standard Professor attempt


to

biography
Brewster's render
to

Lope
translation

(1904).
is the the whole

But

first of of

into the

English aspiring

Lope's
his
own

advice time

playwrights

and

country.

BRANDER

MATTHEWS.

(June

1914.)

NEW THE

ART

OF

MAKING

PLAYS

AGE IN THIS

THE

NEW

ART

OF

MAKING

PLAYS

IN

THIS

AGE

Addressed

to

the

Academy
noble

at

Madrid.

1.

You

command who
"

me,

spirits,
and of of made the

er flownowned re-

of

Spain,

in will the

this
in

congress
space

academy
surpass
not

short assemblies

time

only

Italy
mous faLake in the of the of

which

Cicero,
with his

envious
own

of
name,

Greece,
hard

by
where

of

Avernus,
of

but Plato
to

also
was

Athens
seen

Lyceum

high
you
an

conclave
art

philosophers," play
the
2.

write

of
taste

which crowd.

is

today

acceptable

to

the

Easy
be

seems

this of and

subject,
you

and had knows

easy

it

would
very
out

for

anyone

who who

written
more

few the

comedies,
art

of what

writing
condemns

them

and
me

of
in

all this
art.

these
task

things;
*

for I Not thank have

.Jis that
3.

written I
even

them
was

without

because

ignorant
while
I
was

of
a

the tyro

cepts; pre-

God,
I
went

in

grammar,

through
23

the

books

which

treated
run

the
course

subject,
ten

before from

I had the

seen

the
to

sun

its

times

Ram

the

Fishe^;
4.
i

But

because,
not at

in that

fine,! time,

found
in

that
as

edies com-

were

Spain,

their

first should fellows


crowd

devisers be

in

the

world but

thought
rather
as

that
many

they!
ru

written;

managed
in

them,
crudeness such wise

who
I and

confirmed
so

the
were

its

own

they
who

introduced writes
and
among

in them

that
dies

he

now

artistically
for who lack
custom

without
can

fame
more

guerdon;
those and force. True in

do
art

light

of

than

rea-

Tn
know;
some

5.

it is that

I have the do I

sometimes
art

ten writfew from full of

accordance

with
sooner

which

but,
other
scenes

no

see

coming

source

the where who

monstrosities the crowd

painted
and the

congregates this sad ness, busi-

women

canonize
to

than habit lock Terence


may
not

return

that
to

same

barbarous
a

J and
in

when

have with from


at

write six
my

comedy
I

the and
cry

precepts Plautus
out

keys, study
truth,
aloud;
art

banish

that
even

they
in I

me;
to

for call that

dumb write

books,
in

is

wont

and

accordance

with

whicn

they

devised

who

aspired
since the

to

the crowd talk

applause
pays

of for
to

the the it
to

crowd; comedies,

for,

it is its Yet
taste.

fitting

to

foolishly

satisfy
6.

true

comedy
kind of been

has
poem
to

its
or

end

lished estabart,
ac-

like and that of


men

every

poetic
the of

has

always
and
to

imitate
customs

/tions
age.

paint
all of

the

their soever whatwhich that

Furthermore,
is

poetic
three
verse,
so

imitation

composed

things, harmony,

are

discourse,
to
to

agreeable
which

is also

say

music,

far

was

common

tragedy;
in that and whether

comedy
it
treats

being
of

different and

from

tragedy
actions,
LooTc

lowly
and

plebeian
ones.

tragedy
there

of be

royal
in
our

great

comedies

few

failings,..7.

/^tt/ojwas
imitate the

the

name

given
and
was

to

them,

for of

they
the in
to

actions de Rueda

the
an

doings

crowd.

Lope
of in he these

example today
of the his
are

Spain
be
seen

principles,
prose

and

print

comedies into love them of has old the

so

lowly
of of
*

that

introduces and whence the

doings

mechanics
a

daughter
the
entre-

smith;
of where

there the
art

remained

custom

calling
the

comedies in all its

meses,

persists

force,

there

being people

one

action for
an

and
ernes

that

between
a

beian plehas how


to

entr

with

king

never

been
art,

seen.

And lowness

thus of
and

it is shown

the held

for great
to

very

style,
the the

came

be

in

disrepute,
introduced

king

in

the

comedy
8.

be

for in his

ignorant.
al"

Aristotle

depicts
the
"

'Poetics',
of

tho the which of while


netes

obscurely,
strife of

beginning
and

comedy;
as

between them
say
was

Athens the that would

Megara
inventor;

to

first it have Elias


was

they

Megara
Athens
was

Epicarmus,
it that

Magsays

the

man.

Donatus sacrifices. of the

it had
names

its

origin
as

in

ancient author affirms

He

Thespis
Horace,

the who

tragedy,"
same,
"

following
of

as

comedies,
the

Aristophanes.
in imitation

Homer of

posed com-

'Odyssey'
was
a

comedy,
of
my

but

the in

'Iliad'

famous which added all the

example
I called the
term

edy, trag-

imitation
an

of and
manner

usalem' 'Jertragic;

epic,
same

and
term

in the the

people

commonly
and the Ali-

'Inferno,'
of the

'Purgatorio,'
poet Manetti

'Paradise'

celebrated
and

Dante

ghieri
in his
9.

comedy,

this

recognizes

prolog.
Now

everybody
26

knows

that

comedy,

as

if under

suspicion,
and that
more

was

silenced
also

for satire

tain cer-

time, born,
came

hence

was

which,
to
an

being
end,
and

cruel,
gave
were

more

quickly
the New
;

place
the

to

Comedy.
then the

The fixt

choruses number but of

first

things
was

the

characters whom in

introduced; followed,
offensive.
to

Menander,
the choruses
was more

Terence

held

despite,

as

Terence

circumspect
elevated of
as

as

the

principles;
of

since
to

he

never

the

style
which

comedy
many

the

greatness

tragedy,
vicious
was

have for in

condemned this respect

in

Plautus;
more

Terence

wary.
i

o/"

Tragedy

has

as

its argument this


reason

history,
it
was

and called the There

comedy

fiction;
of

for humble without

flat-footed,

argument, buskin the


or

since stage.

actor

performed
were

comedies with the of of

with toga, the

pallium,
atel-

mimes, lanae,
were

comedies and

fabulae
tavern,
sorts.

comedies
as

which

also,
11.

now,

various

With chided and of For

Attic vice

elegance
and
gave

the
custom

men

of their
to

Athens

evil their
to

in

comedies,
the writers

they
verse

prizes
the

both

and

devisers

of "the

action.

this

Tully
27

called

comedies

"\"
mirror of
"

custom

and

living image
in that whether ! that
you

of

the

truth,"
ran even

very

high tribute, history.


crown

comedy
it be

with of But that this


now

Look

worthy
12.

and I

glory

perceive merely

are

saying
and
up

this
you

is

translating
this been of
you
some

books mixeda son rea-

wearying
affair.

with
me

painting
there has

Believe
you

why
these
to

should for
art

be
you

reminded
see

of
me

things;
the

that

ask in

describe

of

writing plays
is in
are

Spain,
of

where
art;

whatever and
to to

is written tell how ancient is


not
on

defiance
now

they
rule
to

written
to

contrary founded
my

the
reason,

and
me

what draw
on

is

on

ask
art,

to art

experience,
which If
men

for

speaks

truth
13. you,

the

ignorant
you
to

crowd

gainsays.
art,

then,
of

desire
read you

beseech learned
in

genius,
of Udine

the

very
see

Robortello he
in
says

and

will and

what

concerning
he writes
among

Aristotle about
many

especially
as

what

comedy,
books;
state

much
thing every-

as

is scattered of
14.

for

today
If
you

is in wish

of
my

confusion.

to

have have is

opinion
upper

of

the and

comedies
to

which

now

the

hand the

know

why

it
s8

necessary

that

crowd
chimera

with of
I

its laws this


and

should
monster,
you

maintain
I will
me, to

the^vile_
tell
you

comic
do

what
must

hold,

pardon
power

since command

obey
"

whoever

has the of is
no

me,

that, gilding
to

error

of
sort

the

crowd,
have follow
two

desire

tell you there


a

what
recourse

I would but the


to

them;
art

for

observing

mean

between

tremes. ex-

15. be

"Let
"

the
may

subject
you
to

be
excuse

chosen these with

and

do

not

amused,
if
it

precepts

"

happens
matter,

deal

kings;
that and
our

tho,

for the
was

that

understand of
a

Philip
lord,
;

Prudent,
offended the the

King
at

Spain king
hostile

seeing
was

in

them
to art

either
or

because

matter

cause bebe

royal
among

authority
the

ought
and

not

to

represented
1

lowly

the back

vulgar.
to

6.

This

is

merely
we

turning
see

the troduced inresents rep-

Old

Comedy, gods,

where
as

that

Plautus he

in his God this of

'Amphitryon'
that

Jupiter.
in

knows
my

I have

ficulty difsince
not

giving

approbation,
Menander,
But

Plutarch,

speaking
Old
away

does since

highly
are so

esteem

Comedy.
art

we

far

from
29

and

in

Spain

do

it

thousand their
/

wrongs,

let

the

learned

this

once

close 17.^ Terence minotaur


grave,
causes

lips.
r

Tragedy
with of the much for

mixed tho

with it be

comedy
like

and

Seneca,

another
one

Pasiphae,

will

render

part

other

ridiculous;
Nature such

f^r

this
us

variety
good

delight. through

gives variety

example,

it is beautiful.

8.

Bear
one

in mind
action
manner

that

this

subject
to

should the
the

contain story
in

only,
be

seeing

it that
I
mean

no

episodic;
which
any

introduction the
main

of
purpose;

other
nor

things
that ruin
use

are

beside be of that
sun,

member whole

omitted
context.

which There
take

might
is
no

the in

the it

advising
of
;
one

should tho
our

place
view him

in of

the

period

this

is the

Aristotle when
we

but

we

lose

respect with

for the

mingle
mean

tragic comedy.

style
Let except which
can

humbleness
in
as

of little
is

it take when
some

place
the
years
to

time

as

possible, history
these the in he
acts,

poet have

writing
to

pass;

relegate

the

space

between
can

wherein,
go
on some

if necessary,

he
a

have that

character of-

journey;

thing

greatly

30

fends who
19.
at

whoever is offended Oh
very

perceives
go
to
see

it. them.

But

let

not

him

! how time affair tho

lost
at

in admiration

are

many
are

this

seeing
which this

that
an

years

passed
sets
a

in

an

to

artificial would

day
not

limit;
the

for

they
I

allow

mathematical the wrath when


to

day
of in
a

But,

ing consideris
not

that

seated hours from it


most

Spaniard
there is

immoderate,

two

presented
the be Last for
us

him

everything
I deem

Genesis

to

Judgment,
here
so

fitting,if
us

it

to

please

him,

for

to

adjust

everything
20.

that

it succeeds.
once

vThe
and

subject
divide
to

chosen,
into

write three in

in
acts

\\

prose,

the

matter

of
one

time,
the

seeing
space
a

it, if possible, that

each

of

the

day

be

not

broken.

tain Capcomedy

Virues,
into three
as

worthy
which

wit,
before

divided had
gone

acts,
on

on

all
were

fours,
then eleven and of

baby's
I
wrote

feet, for
them of
paper,
age,

comedies

infants.
or

myself,
of
a

when
acts

twelve sheets
act;

years

four sheet

four each

of
and

for it
was

tained con-

then

the
were

fashion made
one,,

that three and

for

the

three

intermissions but

little then

entremeses,
a

today
the

scarce

dance,

for
3"

dancing

is

so*

important
of

in

comedy
and of

that

Aristotle

proves ap-

it,
treat

Athenaeus,
it, though
this

Plato,
last

and

Xenophon
of
reason

proves disapthis he The

indecorous is vexed
to at

dancing; Callipides,
ancient
two

and

for

he

wherein

pretends
matter

ape

the into

chorus.
see

divided from

parts,

to

the

nection con-

the but do

beginning
not

until the
scene

the

action of the its it


in

runs

down;

permit
the the last end

untying
;

the

plot

until

reaching
what and

for
turn

crowd,
face has what
to

knowing
the door three

is, will
to

its shoulder face


more

what for
known.

awaited
appears

hours

to

face;
to

nothing
seldom

is the

be

2i.-\ without
becomes

Very
someone

should

stage
the

remain crowd the

speaking,
in
out

because intervals great

restless

these
at

and

story besides of

spins
its

itself
a

length;

for,

being

great
and

defect, the
artifice. with

avoidance

it increases
vO
22.
IB

grace

X''

Begin
not

then,

and,

simple
thoughts
is

guage, lanand

ilo

spend
on

sententious

witty
that is is

sayings
the

family
talk

trifles, which
two
or

all

familiar

of when

three character
or

people
who suades, dis-

representing.
introduced then

But

the

persuades,
there should
32

counsels be

gravity

and

wit;

for
a man

then

doubtless in
a

is

truth

observed,

since what
or

speaks

different he

style

from

is

common

when
or

gives

counsel,

suades, per-

argues

against
gave
us

anything.
for

Aristides,
this ; for be
pure,

the he

rhetorician,
wishes and be this the

warrant

language

of he the

comedy
adds
usage

to

clear,
should

flexible, and
taken from different the latter and
nor

also of that

that the
ple, peo-

it

being
for in

from
case

of

polite
will
not

society;
be

the

diction Do

elegant,
in

sonorous,

adorned.

drag

quotations,
of those

let your

language
for, if
it should of and

fend ofone

because is be
to

exquisite words;
who of

imitate

speak,

not

by

the

language

Panchaia,

the
cen-

Metaurus,
tai irs.
"

vpf hippogriffs, demi-gods

23.
''

|
as

If

the

king

should

speak,
of

imitate
a

as

much mi the

possible speak,

the observe

gravity
a

king;

if

sage

sententious those listens


a manner

esty; mod-

describe which
manage

lovers
move

with

passions
to

greatly

whoever in such

themjj
the

soliloquies
is

that in

recitant

quite transformed, changes


and the

and

ing chang-

himself,
ask

him listenef^tLet
to

questions
shall make

reply

himself,
observe

and the

if
re-

he

plaints,

let him
33

spect

due

to

women.

T,et if wise

not

ladies

gard disretumes, cos-

their character, and let it be


in such

they change
that
it may

be

excused;

for Let

male him

disguise usually
be
on

is very

pleasing. importance
should
not

his

guard
the

against
chiefest of truth should
the

impossible things, for


that

it is of the

only

likeness The

be

represented.
of
we
no

lackey

discourse which
and in

nor lofty affairs,

express

conceits

have wise in what

seen

in certain

foreign
tradict con-

plays;
to

let the he has

charter
said^I
one

himself
say,

mean

forget,
"

as

in

Sophocles

blames
he Let
v

Oedipus
killed
scenes

for

not

remembering
his
own

that
.,.

has
the

Laius end

with with

h;iml.

epigram,
wise the forth
not set

with

wit, and
at

with

elegant verse,
\

in such leave
act

that,

his exit,he

who
*

spouts the first


weave

audience the the


case.

disgusted.
In in

In

the such
act

y o"

second wise
one

together
the

events,

tKat until the


may

middle

of
outcome.

the

third

hardly

guess

Always
come

trick expectancy;
pass

and

hence

it may from

to

that

something quite far


may

what

is

promised

be

left

to

the
to
are

understanding.
the
ing subjectsbefor
com-

Tactfully suitxyour verse


treated.
"

Dccimas
34

good

plainings;
are

the in

sonnet

is

good

for

those of shine for of


as

who
events

waiting
for in and

expectation; though
Tercets for be

recitals

ask

romances,
octavas.

they
are

brilgrave

'

liantly
affairs

redondillas

affairs

love.
tition repe-

jlJLet

rhetorical
or

figures

brought
in the

in,

anadiplosis,
same
verses

and the

beginning
forms of
trophes, apos-

of

these

various

anaphora;
and
24.

and

also

irony,

questions,

exclamations. deceive the that has of


to

To is
a

audience seemed this do

with

the
as

truth

thing

well,

Miguel
the

Sanchez,
was

worthy
wont

memorial in all his

for
edies. com-

invention,

Equivoke
from

and have

the

uncertainty
held it thinks other
one a

arising large
that is in it

ambiguity
among

always
for the the

place
alone

the

crowd,
what
are

understands Better still part, with

ing. say-

subjects

which

honor

has

since them

they deeply
go

stir everybody; for if


so

along
virtue
an

^ifitwous deeds,
'hence
a we

is

everywhere
chance
to

loved; represent that and if he

see,

actor

traitor, he
he wishes flees

is

hateful

to not

everyone

what the is and crowd

to

buy
it
to

is

sold

him,
but invite

when lend chief

meets

him;
and

loyal, they
even

him

him,
35

the

men

honor

him,
and each
are

love acclaim
act

him,

seek

him

out,

tertain en-

him,
25. for Let

him. have but


to

four the

sheets,
time
and

twelve

well of be for him


not

suited who clear


very

the

patience
parts,
that

is
or

listening.
open,

In it

satirical is known
were
,.
1

since comedies

this law

reason

forbidden without be

by

in for

Greece

and

Italy
der slan-

wound

hate,
expect

if, perchance,

done,

not

applause,

nor

aspire

to

fame.
26.

These which the for the

things
you

you

may

regard
the

as

aphorisms
art,

get

not

from

ancient
no

which
space

present

occasion since of of

allows whatever

ther furhas

treating;
three kinds

to

do

with

stage
concerns

properties
the

which

Vitruvius

speaks
as

presario im-

just
Crinitus,
describe
trees,

Valerius
in

Maximus,

Petrus and others

Horace these

his

epistles,
with simulated Pollux
in

properties,
houses,
and

their

drops,
marbles.

cabins,
Of
were

27.
us

costume

Julius
for of
a

would

tell

if it that

necessary,

Spain
is

it is the with
neck-

case

the

comedy

today

replete
the in

barbarous
gear

things:
a

Turk and

wearing
a

of

Christian

Roman

tight

breeches. 36

28.

But

of than
to

all,

barbarous
art

nojjpdy myselfjsince
down

can

I in

call

more

defiance
and

of

I dare
to

lay

precepts,
in the

I allow
rent, cur-

myself

be

borne

along Italy
and

vulgar
call

wherefore

France

me

ignorant.
four

But hundred
one

what and which

can

I do

if I have

ten writ-

eighty-three comedies,
I

along
week? sin have

with For

have

finished

this

all of

these, except

six, gravely
what I

against

art.

Yet, in fine, I defend


and I better have for is know in had sometimes

written,
have would have
to

that, tho
another the
vogue

they

might they they

been
not

manner,

which which
reason,

had;
what
taste.

that that
very

is

contrary

just, for

pleases

the

How How How And What What Deceit How How How

Comedy
true

reflects her

this

life of
of
narrow

man,

portraiture
in
more

young

and
span,

old;

subtle
purest
grave

wit, polished speech,


and

too

you

behold; smiles,

consideration

mixed

with

seriousness, along with


of

pleasant
oft

jest;

slaves; how

woman

beguiles
breast;
run,

full of

slyness is her
swains

treacherous
to

silly, awkward
rare

sadness
seems

success,

though
37

all

well

begun,

Let
not

one

hear for such


becomes

with
in

attention,

and

dispute
will
to

of found

the of

art;

comedy
that
in

everything listening

be

sort

it

everything

evident.

(Translated

by

William

T.

Brewster.)

NOTES

NOTES

i.

The

opening
into

passage

of

Lope's
verse

poem

is

thus

rendered

English

by

Lord

Holland:"

Bright
Ere And

flow'rs shall

of that the

Spain,

whose

young

academy
outvie;
where Plato

long

by

Tully

nam'd

match'd

Athenian

porch

taught,
Whose You bid
as

sacred
me

shades tell the

such
art

throngs
of

of

sages

sought,

"

writing please,

plays
and
you

Such

the

crowd

might

might

praise,
The To For work
you
seems

easy

"

easy

it

might
but
not

be
to
me.

who should
nor

write I
art

not

much,
rules rule of should antient since all
I

how

the
nor

art

explain,
e'er rules: restrain?

I, whom
Not but God
ten

studied be

all

the

Yes,
Scarce The

praised,
old, subject

long
with
treat

in

grammar

schools,
due,

years

the

patience

books
case was

that

waded latter

through: days, plays


road

My
The So Which I The

simple,
authors

in
"

these

truant

of

our

Spanish
the the
narrow

wide

had the the

wander'd strict stage censur'd fathers with


;

from of

drama

trod, pieces
ador'd. stor'd:
"

found

barbarous the crowd of

critics
more

but

Nay
So Who Be

these
taste,

sad and rule

corrupters
so

the the himself die

stage
age,

blended writes daimn'd

debauch'd

by

must

please
and

alone,
unknown.

without

remorse,

41

Such

force

has their
it

habit
"

for

the the

untaught
antient

fools, rules,

Trusting
Yet,
The But The Who To
true

own,

despise
have

is,

too

written with and than

plays,
skill, might
nonsense,

wiser when

few,
I
see

who how
more

judge
shew

praise

draws fair's
rage

crowd's,
still
sanction
to
are

and,

all, the

applause,

forward
every
monster

with

indulgent
of the
taste

stage.
to

I, doom'd
Resume
I

write,
barbarous rule

the

public
dress

hit,
to

the
up

'twas I

vain

quit;

lock

every

before drive these


cry

write,
out

Plautus Lest And


rage

and

Terence teach

from

my

sight,
to

should dumb

injur'd
shame

wits
on

join,
like

their mine.

books

works

To

vulgar
at

standards
ease;

then

square

my

play,
pay,

Writing
'Tis And

for, since
I

the their

public
compass

just,
write

methinks,
the
nonsense

by

steer,
to

that

they

love

hear.

The he
were

two

lines Plautus

in

which
and

Lope
Terence

declares with in the six

that

locks

up

keys

quoted
of his

by

Victor

Hugo
of

mation proclaart

theories

dramatic

pre-

fixt

to

his

unactable in his

'Cromwell' edition thinks borrowed


a

(1827).
of

But
'Pre

Souriau face de

annotated

the

Cromwell'
may

it

possible
the

that

Hugo
Preuve

have from

quotation
'La the

second-hand des
over

pamphlet
put 'Cid.'

by Scudery,
forth

Passages'
Corneille's
M.

during
It is

quarrel
to note

amusing
these

that in his

Emile

Faguet,
Drame

quoting

lines

'Drame

Ancien,
4*

Moderne'

(p. 122)

inadvertently

credits

them

to

vantes. Cer-

Fitzgerald,
from the
not

in

the

preface
asserts

to

his

tions translaof
do

Calderon,
discoverable

that these
own

certain

defects represent concession


one

in

pieces
better

"Calderon's
to
so

self,
taste

but

private
for

haste
upon

or

public
some

by

who

often

relied
success

ing striknot

dramatic
accurate

crisis

with
be

very

audience."

It may
in

objected
it is based that from but

that
on

this the

plea

is

dangerous

that

unwarrantable

assumption
was

ron's Caldethat it
as

private
the be

taste

different he

of
can

public
urged
of in

to

which behalf of

appealed; Lope Lope's


what
as

potently
own

in

behalf he
must

Calderon. the

plea
is

that
more

give
put

public

it in

wants

effectively
the offend

by
Paris,

Moliere,
;

the

preface
ly needlessit of

to

'Precieuses all
a

Ridicules' if of
I

"I

should

accused

having public
sort,

applauded
is the it would

piece

stupidity;
of
works in
worst
me

as

the this

absolute
be
even

judge
if I had

of
to

impertinent
the 'Precieuses'
now

contradict

it; and
of
I

possible
the that it has

ion opin-

my

before believe
persons

ance, performsome

ought
since well
so

to

value,

many

together

have

spoken
6.

of

it."

Morel-Fatio is

points
a

out

that

this

graph para-

practically

literal

translation in libram

from Horatii

Robortello's

'Paraphrases
43

De that

Comedia.'

It is derives
all

mainly
his

from of

Robortello erudition.
forms in-

Lope
In
us,

parade
as

8.

this

paragraph,
is

Morel-Fatio
on

Lope
on

again
of

relying
this

Robortello

and 9.

also At

Donatus.

the

end

paragraph
attributes
to

Lope,
to

following
the

Donatus

blindly,
of

rence Te-

loftiness

style
As

which

Plautus

occasionally
noted of
in

attained. French the

Damas-Hinard of poet had both


a

his

translation

certain is here

Lope's

plays,
of the

Spanish
since he of

sinning

against light,

first-hand the

knowledge
dramatists.
15.
out

comedies

.Latin

Professor this is

Rennert

(p.

180)

points
and

that

distinction and that down It of the


to
was

between

tragedy
thruout of the

comedy
it
was

arbitrary
one

un-Aristotelian,
obtained the
end

altho
the

"the

Renascence of

and

period
of

Classicism." and
was

the

doctrine theorists

Robortello that this


a

later of the

Italian

it

"the which

rank

characters,
a

and from which

only,

distinguished
This is the maintains

tragedy

comedy." Philip Poesy.'


Here is Lord

distinction
in

Sir of

Sidney

his

'Defence

Holland's lines of

metrical this
the passage

version
:

of
Once

the

concluding
to

behold

monarch
our

on

stage,
rage;

England,
Or that

'tis said, he deem'd

prudent

Philip's
unfit

such

characters
44

For

lively sallies
crowns

and
if

for

comic
were

wit;
allow'd
a

Or To

debas'd,
the
state

actors

bring
In

of

kings

before

low-born

crowd.

his

'Hamburg English
translates

Dramaturgy,'
version
a score

(p.

394-5

of

the

in of that

Bohn's these
nature

series)
ing lines, endhas ludicrous "Is it
true set

Lessing
with
us

Lope's example
serious;
sets
us

assertion of

the

commingling
and
an

the
asks
:

with that and the

the
nature

then

he

example
farcical sad? has It done

of and
seems

the the

common

the
merry

sublime,
and

the the

serious,
so.

But he the that be


But
to
a

if this

is true,
he

Lope
has stage,
not

more

than
over

intended;
faults these fault Mezieres French criticism the of
are

only
has for

glossed nothing
of nature." he

his
no

he

really proved
can

faults,
an

that

is
in

imitation introduction of
a

the

prefixt
Diderot

the

translation quotes
of

Lessing's
from
and

dramatic
on

passage

danger

uniting tragedy
is
never

burlesque
than
a

"Tragicomedy species, disparate


much
advance

be it
are

more

bad
two

because

in

confounded

species, separated
Here

by

natural derived
as

rier." barso

Lessing,
Diderot,
firmer

who reveals

had

from and

himself than
to

in

on

ground
It is

his
note

French that of of

contemporary.

amusing
as a

Diderot,
the
so

so

often

hailed is here
as

forerunner echo

Romanticists,
strict
a

belated

classicist
45

Sir

Philip

Sidney

who

asserted

that
were

the

plays

he

saw

on

the

English
nor

stage

"neither

right tragedies, Kings


so

right
not

comedies,
because
in

mingling
the
matter

and

Clowns,
but
to

carrieth

it,

thrust

Clowns
in
nor

by

head

and

shoulders,
with neither
nor

play

part

magestical
discretion:

matters, So
as

neither the

decency

admiration

and

commiseration,
is

the gicomedy Tra-

right

sportfulness
attained."

by

their

mongrel
this

6.

Morel-Fatio derived These

notes

that from Holland

passage

also 17.

is

directly
lines Lord

Robortello.
turns

into

English
The Grave

couplets:
with the
with I

tragic

comic

muse

combin'd,
Terence
monstrous
one our

Seneca
seem,
one

sprightly
Pasiphae's
our

join'd,
birth,
mirth.

May
Where But

grant,
moves

half

sorrow,

sweet

variety rules,
works

must

still

delight,
says

And,
Thru' And

spite of
all from her

dame she

Nature this

we're

right,

example
derives.

gives,

variety
this the

her

charms

With

statement

of
set to

Lope's
forth

may

be

compared

theory

by

Victor

Hugo
19.

in

the Here

preface
once

'Cromwell.'
as

more,

Morel-Fatio
upon

has

shown,
Three Holland

Lope
and
a

is half

leaning
lines of

Robortello.
passage

this in

Lord

translates

freely
to

this

triplet:

Who

seated

once,

disdain

go

away,

46

Unless

in

two

short from

hours Genesis

they
to

see

the

play
day.

Brought
This without from the

down

judgment
the whole is the
a

popular
selection middle

liking
or

for

story survival

omission when
and

ages

mystery
if
not

play
with of the

began

with

Genesis

ended,
the To

judgment
wicked this
most

day,
into

at

least

with

casting
the
was

Hell-Mouth.
of

Classicists

prolongation
offensive. the the four
custom

the

action

always
into nounces de-

Lord lines
:

Holland in which

turned Boileau

English

The In In
one

Spanish
short rude the

bard,

who includes the

no

nice
a

censure

fears,
years.

day
acts

lapse
fives

of
so

those in

hero

fast,
the last.

Child

first, he's

greybeard

in

And

Sir his

Philip disgust

Sidney
for this for

had

earlier

pressed ex-

license,
their

blaming
lowance altwo verses, tra-

the

English
of

playwrights
time,
"for fall is got in love. with

liberal

ordinary

it is that
many

young

Princes she

After

child, delivered
up
a

of

fair
in and

boy;
love,
all

he and

is lost, groweth is in

man,

falls

ready
two

to

get

another which
may

child;
how

this

hours'
even

space:
sense

absurd and Art

it is in hath

sense

imagine,
ples exam-

taught,
With
in
47

and this his

all
may

ancient be

justified."
Corneille's

compared
on

opinions

'Discourse

the

Three
own

Unities' 'Melite.'

and

in

his

discussion

of

his

Lope's
"two and that the hours after the

limitation is

of

the

duration
to

of

formance per-

exactly equivalent
traffic of the

Shakspere's
But

stage."
adduce the
two

Shack,
evidence in
a

him

Morel-Fatio,
stay
was

customary theaters

of

spectators hours and

Spanish

/half.
20.

Lope's
written
Menendez

advice,
in prose
y
to

that
be

play

should into
rowed borpoem

first be
verse,

turned

later
to

Pelayo
in
a

believes Vida's

be

from
on

passage

Latin

the

poetic
in

art,

"

passage

thus

rendered

in

English
At And A And

Pitt's

translation:
the least
poem
to

first without mold full and


the

restraint

compose prose,

future

with

proper

series

maintain in
to
a

draw stated

the

just

connection
progress

chain.

By
To

bounds the parts

your

control,
whole.

join

and

regulate
this
very

the

Morel-Fatio

thinks familiar with

likely,
work.

since

Lope

was

Vida's

Oddly
down since
seems

enough,
was

the

principle
with the he

Lope
his
own

here

lays

not state

in accord of that
on

practise,
in

the
to

existing
composed
he drew

manuscripts originally
up
a

show

verse,

altho scenario method

occasion
in
prose.

preliminary
that
was

It may

be

noted

the that

here

recommended

by Lope
Moliere,
48 who

actually

adopted

by

(in

his

haste
to

to
on

meet

the

wishes
to

of

Louis
more

XIV)
than

had half
structed con-

call the

Corneille which

versify
he had which into the

of

'Psyche'
in
prose
to

completely
he
verse

and
turn

had

not

been the

able limits Lord of

wholly
of time

within

set

by

king.
renders certain lines

Holland

thus into

this
of

paragraph
three
acts
we

English
to

couplets:
pen,

Plays
Which An The Such Four

owe

Virues'
on

ne'er action

had

crawled
to

but

all
age,

fours

till then;

suited of
not to

that
the

helpless
childhood
years

infancy plays
sheets

wit,
twelve
every

of did
on

the I

stage.

old
an

complete,
sheet.

play,
also

act

every

And for
The Cast

Ticknor his

employs
of
famous
a

the

rimed
passage

let coup:

translation Verues,
in three
upon

longer
wit,

Captain
dramas till his

acts,

by

happy

hit;
crept, stept.
years

For,
Like Such Four Filled Three

time,
babes
wrote,

all
never

fours yet and


to
a

they
had

helpless

that

plays
acts out
"

eleven measured

twelve
sheet's

old;
fold
"

each four

just

sheets;
short

while filled

still, between,
up

entremeses

the

scene.

But in the

Camille

de of

Senne their
p.

and

Guillot of the

de

Saxe of that in

preface
(Paris,

study
44,

'Star

Seville' the the


to

1913,

note)

assert

three-act

form theater And

had half

established
a

itself anterior

Spanish
Verues.

century
in

Lessing 4th,
49

his

'Hamburg
had

Dramaturgy'

(Dec.

1767)

pointed

out

the

discrepancy
of this

between

Lope's
to

assigning
and Caldies), come-

the

credit

change
the the

Verues
to

deron's

claim,
that he

(in
was

preface
first
to

his

make

this

duction. re-

If he

Lope
the

had have

been

familiar the

with three-act

Aristotle form
as

might

justified
out

simply
with As

carrying
that
a

the

Greek have
an

critic's action

principle
a

play
a

must

beginning,
Attic

middle
were

and
acted
a

an

end.
any

tragedies they
a

without

intermission
act,
"

had

only
was

single prolonged
a

altho
acts.

trilogy
Yet the and

story

shown form

in

three of is the

traditional

five-act

seventeenth derived the time

eighteenth
from the of limited in
were

centuries Athenian choral


to

indirectly
wherein
came

drama,

number
to

sages pas-

in five

be

four,
which stood

separating
when forth the
as

passages

dialog,
omitted, Horace,
of the

lyric
five

interludes separate the

acts.

ably probdrian AlexanWeil's

following
'Etudes The MSS. into Terence's noted that

precepts five

critics, prescribes
sur

acts

(see
p.
no

le of
acts

Drame Latin

Antique,' comedy
show

325).
sion diviof be
was

(see

Fairclough's
pp.
as

edition It may form the

'Andria,'
as soon

lii, liii,).
the five-act of
to

disestablished modern

the

tendency
has been Most
5"

leading
the
so-

dramatists three-act form.

adopt
Ibsen's

logical

of

cial
are.

dramas

are

in

three

acts,

just

as

Lope's

Commenting
of the number

on

Lope's
of
pages

strange
a

tion prescripshould tells the


was

comedy

have,
us

Professor "this which followed

Rennert

(p. 163,
to

note)
of

that

rule,

as

the

length lays
down,

comedia,

Lope by
and
"

here all the

carefully
of
rare.

other from leaves


to
a

ists dramatit for


are

the Four

time,
sheets

deviations sixteen leaves

each

act,

that

is

forty-eight
of

comedia.

An shows Where due


"

examination how

Lope's
he adhered
are

autograph
to

plays
rule.
are

strictly

this

slight
to

variations in

found size of

they
the of the

the

difference

the

leaves about other


a

the three

comedia thousand the

always
lines.
.

consisting
On
. .

hand,

comedies of lines." like his fellow

of

Miguel
contain

Sanchez,
about four

predecessor
thousand

Lope,

Lope,
and

dramatists Voltaire of
was

Calderon and Goland


dent stu-

Corneille,
had been
a

Moliere,

doni,
was

pupil
he school with

the
a

Jesuits; youthful

it

doubtless of the

when

Jesuit

in the

Madrid critical of Horace

that theories

he

became of the

acquainted
Italian

commentators

and

Aristotle.
21.
ever

The
to to

rule the

forbidding
stage in empty Donatus

the

dramatist

leave
a

Morel-Fatio

traces

passage

dealing

with

the

omission of

of the

the

chorus

from Altho

the

New

Comedy
does
not

Greeks. discuss this

Corneille

expressly
it
was

rule, he

obeyed
all

it; and
French

generally
who

obeyed accepted
the

by
the

the

dramatists

cist Classiof

theory,
the stage of Theatre fall stage then
are

possibly
became of the
end

because the
act.

leaving

empty

conventional

nal sigat not

the

Even curtain of for the the


a

today
does
an

the ways althe

Frangais,
on

the

the

termination

act;

is the

left three

unoccupied
raps

moment

and hammer
enter

of

wooden characters
On
never

heard,
are

whereupon
begin
the this
next

who

to

act.

the

English-

speaking
itself; and

stage
our

rule

has

established have
now

dramatic
an

poets of

and

again leaving

achieved

effect bare is
and
next

expectancy

by
tators spec-

the wonder

stage who part of

letting
to

the

appear.

23.

this

paragraph by
Lord

is

turned

into
In
ten

English
line
sonnet

couplets
should
a man

Holland:

staves

wailing
who in

grief

be

shown;

The
Let

suits narration
much
a

speaks
ballad

alone; lines;

plain

flow tale in

Though
Grand But

copious
the

octaves

shines;
should
contain

weighty
redondillas

thoughts
suit

triplet
strain.

the

lover's

In

the

introduction
Norman of

to

his

'Select

Plays
a

of
planation ex-

Calderon'

Maccoll various here:


"

gives
sorts

clear

the

of

verse

that "octo-

Lope

mentions

Romances
52

are

syllabic
the these sometimes

trochaics
"

the ballads.
are

customary As sometimes Redondillas in

measure

of

Spanish
trochaics

the

ballads,
and
are ranged ar-

rimed

assonant.

in

strophes
weak fourth

of

four

lines
are

each.

Strong
and plest simuse.

endings
The
so

and and

endings
lines third.
measures
are

both

employed.
is the

first do the of

rime

together,
This in
common

second the

and

riming
each. is that

Quintillas
of
in
occur

arranged only
same

in rule

strophes
observed
must
not

five the

lines

The the
two

riming
in
more

rime successive

than
Decima

lines. of lines.
:

The
two

is
one

combination of
as

quintillas
arrangement
are

in

strophe
rimes
. .

ten

The

of

is
.

follows
a, c,

the
a,

first five
and

disposed
five
are

b, b,
c,

a,

the
.

second Three

arranged
forms of

d, d, jel
verse

other from the the


and

iambic the the

are

borrowed
terza ottava

Italians,

Terceto Octava Maccoll lines

(the
(or
in

rima

of

Italians),
the Sonnet." of

rima}
renders rimes:
finds

his

turn

several

Lope's

into

English
In The decimas

voice
for

the

mourner's action's

wail stay; tale.


convey;

sonnet's
serve

fitted
to
can

the the

Romances Yet While And


octaves

tell

player's
news

well of

stirring import
the
in

deed

high
are

terzas

shines,

redondillas

lover's

lines.

The

incessant

employment
53

of

these

var-

ious

lyric
of

measures

is

evidence,

were

any of

needed,
the
and noted

the of the

prevailing Spanish
its
a

lyrical quality
drama chiefs. when It
in
may

dialog
Calderon that

Lope
be

were

in

'Prunella,

Fantasy
and

Three

Acts,'

by

Lawrence the in authors their


at
rococo

Hausman

Granville the

Barker,
element

emphasize
story

lyrical
thruout

by

scattering

riming
the

stanzas

irregular

intervals

dialog.
That
the
sonnet

with

its artificial interlaced dramatic


a

and

trary arbirimes

scheme should
may
seem

of

intricately
into
readers
was

be

intercalated
to

dialog
gestion. sugmending recom-

modern

strange

Yet
a

Lope

here

only
from fixt

practise

inherited

the

dieval me-

mysteries
of
verse
were

wherein

various

forms Their deviser the

frequently
did
not

employed.
prevent from
even

stanzaic of
a

rigidity
the
and

the

French

passion-play
ballade,
and

utilizing
the
and

triolet,

tained long-susthe
not

stately chant-royal;
himself of emotion the their of
and

wright playonly
in

availed in
passages

aid

lyrical
take

but intenser This

also

the

swift
moments

give

of

dramatic of the the


in

of

the

action.
was

tradition
over

the

religious
of

pieces
the secular

taken drama in

by
of
as

founders
modern French

most
as

languages,
and
was

in
"

English

well first
to

in

Spanish.
composed
54

Corneille's

play
in

'Melite'

especially

bring

sonnet;
cast

and his he and

even

as

late

as

the

'Cid'

Cor-

neille for d'

lyrical monologs
was

into

stanzas,

which

censured

by
and

the

Abbe

Aubignac
his

by Voltaire;
edition likens
end tenor,

Brunetiere
more

(in
of

annotated

of the of

Corneille's

important Rodrigue
bravura

plays)
at

lyrical soliloquy
first
art to to

the
a

the

the the

solo with

of

coming
on

down heart

footlights
Shakspere
for

his the

hand

his

(p. 69).
net son-

used the

looser
to

Elizabethan
and

prolog
for

'Romeo

Juliet' employs

spoken
it for

by
the

Chorus;

and

Ben Court

Jonson
of of the his

Prolog
The

the

'Staple
form

of

News.'

incongruity
when itself
to

fixt

is least outside

obvious the the

the
and

sonnet

is thus

kept

play
address

when audience

it is utilized before did


not

only
action

in

the

the tate hesi-

begins.
to

But this

Shakspere
fixt form Lost' that

employ
Labor's 'All's he

inside

the

play; 2)
and

in 'Love's also
scene

(act iii,scene
ends

in

Well
casts
a

Well' fourteen and


a

(act

iii,

4)
three

letter

into

lines,
terminal

with

riming
And
and

quatrains
in

couplet.
where
at

again
heroine the

'Romeo
meet

and and

Juliet'
in

hero

fall

love this of first third tween beor

first

sight,
is

lyrical significance by
the

of

meeting
the

suggested
Romeo

employment
the the shared
a

fourteener,

speaking
second,
while
are

quatrain,
quatrain

Juliet
and the each

the

final

couplet
in

them,

taking
55

turn

line

two. act

M. of his

Rostand

prefixes

sonnet

to

every for
sets
a

'Chantecler,'
of

utilizing
the

them

poetical
which

description
the action
take

successive

in
posed sup-

of

his

lyrical play
found the in

is

to

place.
is
to

The

ballade century

be

two

teenth nine-

French
de

plays,

'Gringoire'
the

of

Theodore

Banville,
Rostand;

and but
as

'Cyrano
these it is,
"

de

Bergerac'
it is

of

in

both

pieces
a

frankly

presented
in the

what

poem

composed

fixt form suggests

by
that

the

hero

of
were

the

play.
introduced

Maccoll

sonnets

by
more

the

Spanish
that

playwright
part "from of
the

"to

please

the
and

cultivated
remarks be
or

audience";
nature not
more

he could
two
a

their
"

[they]
than put

employed
three He 'Gustos
as

sparingly
sonnets notes
were

usually
one

into

play." pieces,
is in her doubt

that
y

in

oif Calderon's
a

Disgusdiate imme-

tos'

duenna

who

to

her

duty,
that she
must
a

begins
either
sonnet. to

speech
in
a

"by
the

saying
or

indulge
She

soliloquy

pronounce

elects
in turned

former,

and
28.

proceeds
Lord

soliloquize
has

redondillas."

Holland

these

lines

into
None Who
Dare When

English
than

couplets:
more

myself by

barbarous

or

more

wrong,

hurried

the

vulgar
in

taste

along,
of

give

my

precepts and I
to

despite
pronounce
now

rule.
me

France what
am

Italy
do? who

fool.

But

of

plays,

56

With Four And

one

complete

within

these
in

seven

days,
writ,
wit.

hundred

eighty-three
six, against
to

all

have of

all, It

save

the

rules

needs

be

recorded
been

that put
dozen
to

Lope's
to

mentators com-

have endeavor
to

sadly
the half

it in of

their

identify
he here of been

Lope's
accord

plays
with

which the

claims the

be

in

theories has attitude Webster

Classicists. also
to

Attention of
taken

called

the and his

larity simithat

between
in

Lope preface only

here
to

by

the

'White
years

Devil,'
after
"If
"

published
the it be

in
poem

1612,
had this

three

Spanish

been is
no

delivered:
true

objected
I shall
dicere

that

matic Dra-

Poem,
poles
quam
in

easily
plura
and
not

confess
meas

it;

non

nugas

Ipse

ego

dixl;
kind
to

willingly,
I

ignorantly,
should the
was a man

in

this

have such

faulted;
an

for

present

Auditory
that
ever

most

tentious con-

Tragedy
all and

written,

serving ob-

the of

critical
person,

laws,
enrich
as

as

height
it with life

of the
'n

style
tentious sen-

gravity

chorus,
in the

and,
and

it were,

Death yet
mess*

passionate
all this divine

weighty
rapture, that
comes

Nuntius,
O
dura

after
orum

ilia, the

breath is let this


hodie

from

the

incapable
ere

multitude

able

to

poison
resolve

it; and
to

it be
every

acted,
scene

the of

author

fix

to

Horace,
comedenda

Haec

Porcis

relinques."
B.

M.

or

THIS

BOOK

THREE

HUNDRED

AND

THIRTY-THREE

COPIES

WERE

PRINTED

FROM

TYPE

.BY

CORU1S,

MACY

AND

COMPANY

IN

NOVEMBER

MCMXIV

You might also like