Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted by:
Md. Hasib Al Mahbub
Student Id: 0902045
Level: 3; Term: 2
Section: A2
0902042
0902043
0902044
Summary
The main objective of this experiment was to study, operate and obtain characteristics, to
perform material and energy balance and to determine steam economy which denotes the
efficiency of the whole evaporating operation of a single effect evaporator. This process
involved evaporation of only water in a still and steam at 10 psig is supplied to the still to heat
the water for evaporating. The vapor produced in the column goes to condenser and in a
condensate collected tank it was collected to find out the total amount of vapor formed with
time. Using the observed experimental data cumulative steam economy as well as overall steam
economy was calculated .The values of cumulative steam economy range was 0-0.19548 and
steam economy range for each observation was 0-0.960837 and the overall steam economy was
0.1955 .The overall heat loss was 131.902 MJ. A graph between vapor condensation rates vs.
cumulative time was plotted. The graph shows that the time required to reach steady state
condition was high. There were some discrepancies in the experiment. The possible cause of
other discrepancies discussed in discussions.
Temperature
of Still
Steam Chest
Water Level
Evaporator
Steam In
Feed In
Drain
Condensate
Drum
Stream Trap
Experimental Setup
Entrain
Separator
Condenser
Cooling
Water Temp.
Temperature
of Vapor
Steam Pressure
Evaporator
Pressure
Flow Diagram
Observed Data
Steam pressure = 10 Psig
Weight of bucket1 =0.65 Kg
Weight of bucket2 = 0.70 Kg
Time interval = 180 Sec
Condensate tank perimeter = 76 inch
Cooling water flow rate = 0.23 Kg/Sec
Cooling water inlet temperature = 74 oF
Cooling water outlet temperature = 80 oF
Table-1: Observed data for study of single effect evaporator.
Obs.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Vapor space
Still
Steam
Level of
Steam
Temperature Temperature condensate
vapor
condensate
( oF )
( oF )
Time (Sec) condensate
+
( cm)
Bucket1
(kg)
68
72
76
84
96
108
120
130
146
188
210
212
212
212
212
212
212
212
212
212
212
212
212
212
212
100
122
144
160
174
180
186
190
196
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
206
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
91.9
91.9
91.9
91.9
91.9
91.9
91.9
91.9
91.9
91.9
91.9
91.3
91.1
90.9
90.7
90.5
90.3
90.0
89.8
89.5
89.2
88.9
88.6
88.2
87.9
6.5
4.35
3.3
2.75
2.3
2.25
2.45
2.5
2.3
2.6
2.72
3.5
2.6
Steam
condensate
+
Bucket2
(kg)
5
3.95
2.8
2.5
2.5
2.55
2.4
2.6
2.3
2.6
4.15
4
-
Calculated Data
Table-2: Calculated data for study of single effect evaporator.
Obs.
No.
Time
(sec)
Cumulative
height of
vapor
condensate(m)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
180
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.006
0.008
0.010
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.019
0.021
0.024
0.027
0.030
0.033
0.037
0.040
Water
evaporated
(Kg)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.7775
0.5925
0.5925
0.5925
0.5925
0.5925
0.8887
0.5925
0.8887
0.8887
0.8887
0.8887
1.1850
0.8887
Water
condensation
rate
Kg/Sec
Steam
condensate
(Kg)
Rate of steam
condensation
(Kg / Sec )
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0098
0.0033
0.0033
0.0033
0.0033
0.0033
0.0049
0.0033
0.0049
0.0049
0.0049
0.0049
0.0065
0.0049
5.85
4.30
3.70
3.25
2.65
2.10
2.10
1.80
1.65
1.80
1.60
1.85
1.80
1.70
1.85
1.90
1.65
1.60
1.95
1.90
2.07
3.45
2.85
3.30
1.95
0.0325
0.0238
0.0205
0.0180
0.0147
0.0116
0.0116
0.0100
0.0091
0.0100
0.0088
0.0103
0.0100
0.0094
0.0103
0.0106
0.0092
0.0088
0.0108
0.0105
0.0115
0.0191
0.0158
0.0183
0.0108
Cumulative
wt. of steam
cond.(Kg)
Cumulative
Steam
economy
Steam
economy
for each
observation
Heat
recovered
by
steam(MJ)
Heat
absorbed
by
water(MJ)
Heat
loss(MJ)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
5.850
10.15
13.85
17.10
19.75
21.85
23.95
25.75
27.40
29.20
30.80
32.65
34.45
36.15
38.00
39.90
41.55
43.15
45.10
47.00
49.07
52.52
55.37
58.67
60.62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.05444
0.06879
0.08195
0.09355
0.10395
0.11408
0.13044
0.13794
0.15128
0.16301
0.16922
0.17656
0.18683
0.19548
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.960837
0.329176
0.348539
0.320279
0.311851
0.359101
0.555484
0.303854
0.467776
0.429359
0.257616
0.311851
0.359101
0.455782
15.789
27.394
37.380
46.152
53.304
58.972
64.640
69.498
73.952
78.810
83.128
88.121
92.979
97.568
102.56
107.68
112.14
116.46
121.72
126.85
132.43
141.75
149.44
158.34
163.61
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.755
6.341
7.926
9.511
11.09
12.68
15.06
16.64
19.02
21.40
23.77
26.15
29.32
31.70
15.789
27.394
37.380
46.152
53.304
58.972
64.640
69.498
73.952
78.810
83.128
83.365
86.638
89.641
93.049
96.592
99.460
101.40
105.07
107.82
111.03
117.97
123.28
129.02
131.90
Overall heat
released from
steam (MJ)
163.612
Overall heat
recovered by
water(MJ)
31.705
Sample Calculation
For Observation no. 16
Steam condensate flow rate = {(2.6 0.7) / 180} kg /sec
= 0.011 kg /sec
Overall steam economy = (Total mass of water evaporated / Total mass of steam consumed)
= (11.85 / 60.62)
= 0.1955
= 0.5925 Kg
Range of
Range of
Overall heat
Overall steam
economy for
cumulative heat
cumulative
loss(MJ)
economy
each observation
loss (MJ)
steam economy
0-0.960837
15.789-131.90
0-0.19548
131.902
0.1955
From vapor condensation rate Vs. cumulative time curve, it was observed that at beginning rate
increases with time and go through the pick point its to a steady state condition. This state arrived after
40 minutes.
In this experiment, the steam economy is very low because of single effect evaporator. Steam economy
would be greater if multiple effect evaporator was used. Heat loss is very high .The possible reasons for
this high heat loss are discussed below
In this experiment, we converted a double effect evaporator to a single effect evaporator by
closing some valves. The total unit of heat exchanger was too old to perform and lost its actual
insulation. Therefore, energy could be lost in the surroundings.
The inlet steam was collided at the steam chest and thus condensed and lost its energy.
The evaporator, condenser, other apparatus used, and the internal pipe network could absorb
some energy.
Moreover, the result could be varied due to the error reading of the mass of condensed steam
and height of condensed vapor.
10